You are on page 1of 1

RUBRIC FOR ASSESSING LABORATORY

CC505 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 1 (LABORATORY WORK)


(LAB REPORT ASSESSMENT)
Note: Attach this sheet in each lab report and place it after the front page.
Experimental procedure

4
Excellent
Well-written in paragraph
format, all experimental
details are covered.

Results:
Data, figures, graphs,
tables,etc

All figures, graphs, tables


are correctly drawn, are
numbered and contain
titles/captions.

Observations and
calculations

Excellent evidence of indepth observations and all


calculations are accurate.
All important trends and
data comparisons have been
interpreted correctly and
discussed;good
understanding of results is
conveyed. All questions
have been answered
correctly.
All important conclusions
have been clearly made,
student shows good
undertanding

Discussion

Conclusions ( based on the


experimentals objectives )

Contribution to grouping
Appearance and formatting

Most contributed
All sections in order, wellformatted

3
Good
Written in paragraph
format, important
experimental details are
covered, some minor details
are missing.
All figures, graphs, tables
are correctly drawn, but
some have minor problems
or could still be improved.

2
Fair
Written in paragraph
format, still missing some
important experimental
details

1
Unsatisfactory
Missing several important
experimental details or not
written in paragraph format.

Most figures, graphs, tables


OK,some still missing some
important or required
features

/4

Good evidence of
observations and most
calculations are accurate
Almost all the results and
questions( if appropriate)
have been correctly
interpreted and
discussed;only minor
improvement are needed.

Some evidence of
observations and partly
accurate calculations
Some of the results and
questions ( if appropriate
)have been correctly
interpreted and discussed;
partial but incomplete
understanding of results is
still evident

Figures, graphs, tables


contain errors or are poorly
constructed, have missing
titles, captionnor numbers,
units missing or incorrect,
etc
Little evidence of
observatios and inaccurate
calculations.
Very incomplete or
incorrect interpretation of
trends and comparison of
data indicating a lack of
understanding of result

All imprtant conclusions


have been drawn, could be
better stated

Conclusions regarding
major points are drawn, but
many are misstated,
indicating a lack of
understanding
Less contribution
Section in order, formatting
is rough but readable

Conclusions missing or
missing the important
points

/4

Little contribution
Sections out of orders

/4
/4

More contributed
All section in order,
formatting generally good
but could still be improved.
Total Score
TOTAL MARKS = total score / 28 x 100%

Score
/4

/4

/4

/28
/100