You are on page 1of 3

42694 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

144 / Thursday, July 27, 2006 / Notices

is based on (and virtually identical to) C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s public in accordance with the
CBOE Rule 6.48(b)(ii), which permits Statement on Comments on the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
cancellation of the options leg of a Proposed Rule Change Received From available for inspection and copying in
stock-option order.5 Members, Participants, or Others the Commission’s Public Reference
It is important to note that the No written comments were either Room. Copies of such filing also will be
proposed rule change would require solicited or received. available for inspection and copying at
that the CHX floor participant maintain the principal office of the Exchange. All
records ‘‘sufficient to establish that III. Date of Effectiveness of the comments received will be posted
market conditions in a non-Exchange Proposed Rule Change and Timing for without change; the Commission does
market prevented the execution of the Commission Action not edit personal identifying
option leg(s).’’ The CHX believes this Within 35 days of the date of information from submissions. You
requirement would give the CHX publication of this notice in the Federal should submit only information that
Department of Market Regulation the Register or within such longer period (i) you wish to make publicly available. All
ability to oversee the cancellation of as the Commission may designate up to submissions should refer to File
stock leg orders, to ensure against 90 days of such date if it finds such Number SR–CHX–2005–34 and should
abusive trade reporting practices.6 longer period to be appropriate and be submitted on or before August 17,
publishes its reasons for so finding, or 2006.
2. Statutory Basis
(ii) as to which the CHX consents, the For the Commission, by the Division of
The Exchange believes that its Commission will: Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
A. By order approve such proposed authority.9
proposal, as amended, is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act 7 in general, and rule change, as amended; or Jill M. Peterson,
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) B. Institute proceedings to determine Assistant Secretary.
of the Act 8 in particular, in that it is whether the proposed rule change [FR Doc. E6–11980 Filed 7–26–06; 8:45 am]
designed to promote just and equitable should be disapproved. BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
principles of trade, to remove IV. Solicitation of Comments
impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market Interested persons are invited to SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
and a national market system, and, in submit written data, views, and COMMISSION
general, to protect investors and the arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule [Release No. 34–54159; File No. SR–NASD–
public interest by promoting 2006–058]
consistency between the Exchange and change is consistent with the Act.
options markets relating to cancellation Comments may be submitted by any of Self-Regulatory Organizations;
of the components of stock-option the following methods: National Association of Securities
orders. Electronic Comments Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Order Granting Accelerated Approval
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s • Use the Commission’s Internet of a Proposed Rule Change and
Statement on Burden on Competition comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Amendment No. 1 Thereto Regarding
rules/sro.shtml); or Pricing for Non-Members Using the
The Exchange does not believe that • Send an e-mail to rule-
the proposed rule change, as amended, Nasdaq Market Center and Nasdaq’s
comments@sec.gov. Please include File Brut and INET Facilities
would impose any burden on Number SR–CHX–2005–34 on the
competition. subject line. July 17, 2006.
Paper Comments Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
execution of the options leg at the agreed upon
price.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
5 According to CHX, the stock leg of a stock-
• Send paper comments in triplicate (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
option order is always presented to the CHX with to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, notice is hereby given that on May 1,
an identified buyer and seller who have agreed to Securities and Exchange Commission, 2006, the National Association of
the terms of the trade. Both buyer and seller are Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’),
aware of the possibility that the stock leg of a stock- Washington, DC 20549–1090.
option order may be cancelled on the CHX if the through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq
corresponding options leg is cancelled on an All submissions should refer to File Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’), filed
options market. The CHX states that, because both Number SR–CHX–2005–34. This file with the Securities and Exchange
the buyer and seller would be identified when the number should be included on the Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
stock leg is presented to the CHX, there would be
no possibility that another CHX member’s order subject line if e-mail is used. To help the proposed rule change as described in
could be matched against a stock-option order. Commission process and review your Items I and II below, which Items have
Accordingly, the CHX believes that there would be comments more efficiently, please use been prepared by Nasdaq. On June 12,
no risk that an investor’s order could be only one method. The Commission will 2006, Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 1 to
involuntarily cancelled without notice to the
investor; the CHX thus believes that this pattern post all comments on the Commission’s the proposed rule change.3 The
and practice amply satisfies the requirements of Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
proposed Interpretation and Policy .01(d). rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
6 The recordkeeping requirement would permit 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
submission, all subsequent
the CHX Department of Market Regulation to 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
monitor patterns that may develop, as well as the
amendments, all written statements 3 In Amendment No. 1, Nasdaq amended the
overall quantity of trade cancellations, to help deter with respect to the proposed rule description of the proposed rule change to indicate
members from simply canceling orders for the sake change that are filed with the
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

that when a market participant enters an order into


of convenience. The Exchange believes that the Commission, and all written Nasdaq’s Brut or INET systems that is sent to a
recordkeeping requirement would help ensure that Nasdaq Market Center market participant that
the volume of transactions reported is accurate and
communications relating to the
charges an access fee to Brut or INET, the market
complete and not overstated. proposed rule change between the participant entering the order shall be charged (i)
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). Commission and any person, other than the applicable execution fee of the Nasdaq
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). those that may be withheld from the Facilities, or (ii) in the case of executions against

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:46 Jul 26, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM 27JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 144 / Thursday, July 27, 2006 / Notices 42695

Commission is publishing this notice to II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s schedule to orders that are entered into
solicit comments on the proposed rule Statement of the Purpose of, and Brut or Inet, routed to the Nasdaq
change, as amended, from interested Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Market Center for execution, and then
persons, and at the same time is Change delivered for execution to an ECN that
granting accelerated approval of the In its filing with the Commission, receives orders through the order
proposed rule change, as amended. Nasdaq included statements concerning delivery functionality of the Nasdaq
the purpose of and basis for the Market Center. Because the current fee
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s schedule is ambiguous as to the
proposed rule change, as amended, and
Statement of the Terms of Substance of discussed any comments it received on treatment of such orders, Nasdaq
the Proposed Rule Change the proposed rule change. The text of believes that the rule text should be
these statements may be examined at clarified to reflect Nasdaq’s
This filing relates to the pricing for interpretation of the fee schedule.
non-members using the Nasdaq Market the places specified in Item III below.
Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set Because the orders are transmitted using
Center and Nasdaq’s Brut and INET Brut/Inet routing technology and then
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
Facilities. The filing will apply to these transmitted again for execution through
the most significant aspects of such
non-members the same rule change that statements. the systems of a third party, Nasdaq
Nasdaq is instituting for members.4 believes that it is most appropriate to
Nasdaq seeks approval to implement the A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s categorize these orders as routed orders.
proposed rule change retroactively as of Statement of the Purpose of, and Accordingly, routing fees, which range
May 1, 2006. The text of the proposed Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule from $0.001 to $0.004 per share
rule change is below. Proposed new Change executed, apply rather than order
language is in italics.5 1. Purpose execution or delivery fees.
SR–NASD–2006–057 6 applied these
7010. System Services Nasdaq is reducing its fees for market
changes to NASD members on an
participants routing orders from its
(a)–(h) No change. three trading platforms—the Nasdaq immediately effective basis. Nasdaq is
Market Center, Brut, and Inet—to the submitting this filing to apply these
(i) Nasdaq Market Center and Brut changes to non-members, who Nasdaq
Facility Order Execution. American Stock Exchange (‘‘Amex’’).
Specifically, whereas Nasdaq previously anticipates will be allowed to continue
(1)–(7) No change. charged $0.01 per share executed for to use the Brut and Inet facilities until
(8) The fees applicable to non- routing such orders, the fee is be NASDAQ LLC begins to operate as a
members using Nasdaq’s Brut and Inet reduced to $0.003 per share executed. national securities exchange.
Facilities shall be the fees established However, an additional fee of $0.01 will 2. Statutory Basis
for members under Rule 7010(i), as be charged in cases where the Amex
Nasdaq believes that the proposed
amended by SR–NASD–2005–019, SR– specialist charges a fee to execute the
rule change, as amended, is consistent
NASD–2005–035, SR–NASD–2005–048, order (which generally occurs when the
with the provisions of Section 15A of
SR–NASD–2005–071, SR–NASD–2005– order remains on the specialist book for
the Act,7 in general, and with Section
125, SR–NASD–2005–137, SR–NASD– more than a certain amount of time
15A(b)(5) of the Act,8 in particular, in
2005–154, SR–NASD–2006–013, SR– before being executed).
Nasdaq is also broadening the that it provides for the equitable
NASD–2006–023, [and] SR–NASD– allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
2006–031, and SR–NASD–2006–057, conditions under which a market
participant may qualify for a reduced other charges among members and
and as applied to non-members by SR– issuers and other persons using any
fee of $0.0028 per share executed to
NASD–2005–020, SR–NASD–2005–038, facility or system which the NASD
access liquidity and route orders in
SR–NASD–2005–049, SR–NASD–2005– operates or controls.
Nasdaq-listed securities and exchange-
072, SR–NASD–2005–126, SR–NASD– traded funds. Currently, market B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
2005–138, SR–NASD–2005–155, SR– participants qualify for the $0.0028 fee Statement on Burden on Competition
NASD–2006–014, SR–NASD–2006–024, (a reduction from the otherwise
[and ]SR–NASD–2006–032, and SR– Nasdaq does not believe that the
applicable fee of $0.003 per share proposed rule change, as amended, will
NASD–2006–058. executed) if they (i) provide an daily result in any burden on competition that
(j)–(w) No change. average of more than 30 million shares is not necessary or appropriate in
* * * * * of liquidity during a month and (ii) furtherance of the purposes of the Act,
access and/or route a daily average of as amended.
more than 50 million shares of liquidity
Quotes/Orders at less than $1.00 per share, a pass- C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
during a month. With the proposed rule
through of the access fee charged to Brut or INET.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
change, the reduced fee would also be Statement on Comments on the
54160 (July 17, 2006). Notice of filing and
available to market participants that (i) Proposed Rule Change Received From
immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change provide a daily average of more than 20 Members, Participants, or Others
regarding the pricing schedule for NASD members million shares of liquidity during a Written comments were neither
using the Nasdaq Market Center and Nasdaq’s Brut month and (ii) access and/or route a solicited nor received.
and INET Facilities. daily average of more than 60 million
5 Changes are marked to the rule text that appears
shares of liquidity during a month. III. Solicitation of Comments
in the electronic NASD Manual found at http:// Thus, the change will broaden the Interested persons are invited to
www.nasd.com, as amended by SR–NASD–2006–
availability of the reduced fee to market submit written data, views, and
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

013 (January 30, 2006). The NASDAQ Stock Market


LLC (‘‘NASDAQ LLC’’) will not file conforming
participants that provide comparatively arguments concerning the foregoing,
changes to its rules with regard to order execution less liquidity but access and/or route
and routing by non-members, since persons that are comparatively more liquidity. 6 See supra note 4.
not members of NASDAQ LLC will not be permitted Nasdaq is also adding rule text to 7 15 U.S.C. 78o–3.
to use its order execution and routing systems. clarify the application of its current fee 8 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(5).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:46 Jul 26, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM 27JYN1
42696 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 144 / Thursday, July 27, 2006 / Notices

including whether the proposed rule organization.9 Specifically, the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
change, as amended, is consistent with Commission believes that the proposed COMMISSION
the Act. Comments may be submitted by rule change, as amended, is consistent [Release No. 34–54160; File No. SR–NASD–
any of the following methods: with Section 15A(b)(5) of the Act,10 2006–057]
Electronic Comments which requires that the rules of the self-
regulatory organization provide for the Self-Regulatory Organizations;
• Use the Commission’s Internet equitable allocation of reasonable dues, National Association of Securities
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ fees, and other charges among members Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
rules/sro.shtml); or and issuers and other persons using any Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
facilities or system which it operates or Rule Change and Amendment No. 1
• Send an e-mail to rule-
controls. Thereto Regarding the Pricing
comments@sec.gov. Please include File
Schedule for NASD Members Using the
Number SR–NASD–2006–058 on the The Commission notes that this Nasdaq Market Center and Nasdaq’s
subject line. proposal would retroactively modify Brut and INET Facilities
pricing for non-NASD members using
Paper Comments July 17, 2006.
the Nasdaq Market Center and Nasdaq’s
• Send paper comments in triplicate Brut and INET Facilities that would Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, permit the schedule for non-NASD Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Securities and Exchange Commission, members to mirror the schedule (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC applicable to NASD members that notice is hereby given that on May 1,
20549–1090. became effective May 1, 2006, pursuant 2006, the National Association of
to SR–NASD–2006–057. Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’),
All submissions should refer to File through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq
Number SR–NASD–2006–058. This file The Commission finds good cause for Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’), filed
number should be included on the approving the proposed rule change, as with the Securities and Exchange
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the amended, prior to the 30th day of the Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
Commission process and review your date of publication of the notice thereof proposed rule change as described in
comments more efficiently, please use in the Federal Register. The Items I, II, and III below, which Items
only one method. The Commission will Commission notes that the proposed have been prepared by Nasdaq. On June
post all comments on the Commission’s fees for non-NASD members are 12, 2006, Nasdaq filed Amendment No.
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ identical to those in SR–NASD–2006– 1 to the proposed rule change.3
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 057, which implemented those fees for Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the
submission, all subsequent NASD members and which became Act 4 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,5
amendments, all written statements effective as of May 1, 2006. The Nasdaq has designated this proposal as
with respect to the proposed rule Commission notes that this change will establishing or changing a due, fee, or
change that are filed with the promote consistency in Nasdaq’s fee other charge, which renders the
Commission, and all written schedule by applying the same pricing proposed rule change effective
communications relating to the immediately upon filing. The
schedule with the same date of
proposed rule change between the Commission is publishing this notice, as
effectiveness for both NASD members
Commission and any person, other than and non-NASD members. Therefore, the amended, to solicit comments on the
those that may be withheld from the proposed rule change from interested
Commission finds that there is good persons.
public in accordance with the cause, consistent with Section 19(b)(2)
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
of the Act,11 to approve the proposed
available for inspection and copying in Statement of the Terms of Substance of
rule change, as amended, on an
the Commission’s Public Reference the Proposed Rule Change
accelerated basis.
Section, 100 F Street, NE, Washington,
Nasdaq proposes to modify the
DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will V. Conclusion
pricing for NASD members using the
be available for inspection and copying
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Nasdaq Market Center and Nasdaq’s
at the principal office of the NASD. All
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,12 that the Brut and INET Facilities (the ‘‘Nasdaq
comments received will be posted
proposed rule change, as amended, (File Facilities’’). Nasdaq implemented the
without change; the Commission does
proposed rule change on May 1, 2006.
not edit personal identifying No. SR–NASD–2006–058) is approved The text of the proposed rule change,
information from submissions. You on an accelerated basis. as amended, is available on the NASD’s
should submit only information that For the Commission, by the Division of
you wish to make available publicly. All Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
submissions should refer to File authority.13 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
Number SR–NASD–2006–058 and 3 In Amendment No. 1, Nasdaq amended
Jill M. Peterson,
should be submitted on or before proposed Rule 7010(i)(7) to indicate that when a
August 17, 2006. Assistant Secretary. market participant enters an order into Nasdaq’s
[FR Doc. E6–11981 Filed 7–26–06; 8:45 am] Brut or INET systems that is sent to a Nasdaq
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order Market Center market participant that charges an
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P access fee to Brut or INET, the market participant
Granting Accelerated Approval of entering the order shall be charged (i) the applicable
Proposed Rule Change 9 The Commission has considered the proposed execution fee of the Nasdaq Facilities, or (ii) in the
case of executions against Quotes/Orders at less
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

rule’s impact on efficiency, competition and capital


The Commission finds that the than $1.00 per share, a pass-through of the access
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). fee charged to Brut or INET. Nasdaq also made
proposed rule change is consistent with 10 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(5).
conforming changes to the description of the
the requirements of the Act and the 11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
proposed rule change.
rules and regulations thereunder 12 Id. 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
applicable to a self-regulatory 13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:46 Jul 26, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM 27JYN1

You might also like