Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

131 / Monday, July 10, 2006 / Notices 38901

Advisory Council, which was Superintendent concerning the matters obtained by contacting the
established to provide guidance to the to be discussed. Commission’s ADD terminal on (202)
Secretary on long-term planning for Persons wishing further information 205–1810.
Great Sand Dunes National Park and concerning this meeting may contact SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
Preserve. Catherine F. Light, Trail 13, 2005, the Commission instituted this
DATES: The meeting date is: Superintendent, Selma to Montgomery investigation, based on a complaint filed
1. July 28, 2006, 9 a.m.–12 p.m., National Historic Trail, at 334–727– by Power Integrations, Inc. (‘‘PI’’) of San
Mosca, Colorado. 6390 (phone), 334–727–4597 (fax) or Jose, California. The complaint, as
ADDRESSES: The meeting location is:
mail 1212 Old Montgomery Road, amended and supplemented, alleges
1. Mosca, Colorado—Great Sand Tuskegee Institute, Alabama 36088. violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Dunes National Park and Preserve Dated: June 21, 2006. Act of 1930 (19 U.S. 1337) in the
Visitor Center, 11999 Highway 150, Shirley T. Streeter, importation into the United States, the
Mosca, CO 81146. Administrative Officer, Selma to Montgomery sale for importation, and the sale within
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: NHT. the United States after importation of
Steve Chaney, 719–378–6312. [FR Doc. 06–6075 Filed 7–7–06; 8:45 am] certain power supply controllers and
products containing the same by reason
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the July BILLING CODE 4310–04–M
of infringement of claims 1–3, 6, 9, and
28 meeting, the National Park Service
17–19 of United States Patent No.
will share a summary and discuss the
6,212,079; claims 1–3, 5, 6, 24, 28, and
comments received during the review INTERNATIONAL TRADE
29 of United States Patent No. 6,351,398
period for the draft General COMMISSION
(‘‘the ‘398 patent’’; claims 8 and 12 of
Management Plan, Wilderness Study
In the Matter of Certain Power Supply United States Patent No. 6,366,481; and
and EIS. A public comment period will
Controllers and Products Containing claims 1, 4, 9–11, 12, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23,
be held from 11:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Same; Notice of Commission 26, 27, 30, 31, and 34 of United States
Michael D. Snyder, Determination Not To Review a Final Patent No. 6,538,908 (‘‘the ‘908 patent’’).
Regional Director. Initial Determination of Violation of During the investigation, the
[FR Doc. 06–6076 Filed 7–7–06; 8:45 am] Section 337; Schedule for Filing Commission allowed PI to terminate the
BILLING CODE 4312–CL–M Written Submissions on Remedy, the investigation with regard to several
Public Interest, and Bonding claims, leaving only claims 1, 3, 5, and
6 of the ‘398 patent and claims 26 and
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 27 of the ‘908 patent in this
Commission investigation. The complaint named a
National Park Service ACTION: Notice. single respondent, System General
Corporation (‘‘SG’’).
Selma to Montgomery National Historic SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that On May 15, 2006, the ALJ issued a
Trail Advisory Council Notice of the U.S. International Trade final ID, including his recommended
Meeting Commission has determined not to determination on remedy and bonding.
review the Administrative Law Judge’s In his ID, the ALJ found that SG’s
Notice is hereby given in accordance
(‘‘ALJ’’) final Initial Determination accused products infringe claims 1, 3, 5,
with the Federal Advisory Committee
(‘‘ID’’) finding a violation of section 337. and 6 of the ‘398 patent and claims 26
Act, Public Law 92–463, that a meeting
Notice is further given that the and 27 of the ‘908 patent. Moreover, he
of the Selma to Montgomery National
Commission is requesting briefing on concluded that these claims are not
Historic Trail Advisory Council will be
remedy, public interest, and bonding invalid for anticipation under 35 U.S.C.
held Tuesday, July 18, 2006 at 9 a.m.
with respect to the respondent found in 102 and that the ‘398 patent and the
until 3:30 p.m., at the Lowndes County
violation. ‘908 patent are not unenforceable due to
Interpretive Center located at 7001
Highway 80 West, Hayneville, Alabama. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: inequitable conduct. Finally, the ALJ
The Selma to Montgomery National Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the concluded that PI proved that there is a
Historic Trail Advisory Council was General Counsel, U.S. International domestic industry in the United States
established pursuant to Public Law 100– Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., with respect to both patents. As a result,
192 establishing the Selma to Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) the ALJ recommended issuing a limited
Montgomery National Historic Trail. 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential exclusion order directed to infringing
This Council was established to advise documents filed in connection with this power supply controllers produced by
the National Park Service on such issues investigation are or will be available for SG, as well as certain downstream
as preservation of trail routes and inspection during official business products containing these controllers.
features, public use, standards for hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the On May 26, 2006, respondent SG filed
posting and maintaining trail markers, Office of the Secretary, U.S. a petition for review, challenging
and administrative matters. International Trade Commission, 500 E various aspects of the ALL’s final ID. On
The matters to be discussed include: Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, June 5, 2006, PI and the Commission
(A) Welcome New Members. telephone (202) 205–2000. General investigative attorney separately filed
(B) Update on Lowndes County IC. information concerning the Commission responses to SG’s petition for review,
(C) Update on other Interpretive Sites. may also be obtained by accessing its asserting that the ALJ properly
The meeting will be open to the Internet server at [Link] determined that there was a violation of
public. However, facilities and space The public record for this investigation section 337 with regard to the asserted
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

accommodating members of the public may be viewed on Commission’s claims.

are limited and persons will be electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// Having examined the record of this
accommodated for first come, first serve [Link]/secretary/[Link]. investigation, including the ALL’s final
basis. Anyone may file a written Hearing-impaired persons are advised ID, the petitions for review, and the
statement with Catherine F. Light, Trail that information on this matter can be responses thereto, the Commission has

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:10 Jul 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\[Link] 10JYN1
 38902 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 131 / Monday, July 10, 2006 / Notices

determined not to review the ALL’s ID. interested in receiving submissions INTERNATIONAL TRADE
To the extent SG attempts to challenge concerning the amount of the bond that COMMISSION
PI’s satisfaction of the importation should be imposed if a remedy is
[USITC SE–06–045]
requirement of 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(l)(B) in ordered.
its petition for review, we decline to Written Submissions: The parties to Government in the Sunshine Act
reconsider the issue. SG failed to file a the investigation are requested to file Meeting Notice
petition for review challenging the written submissions on the issues
ALL’s December 12, 2005 ID granting identified in this notice. Parties to the AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United
PI’s motion for summary determination investigation, interested government States International Trade Commission.
that it satisfied the importation agencies, and any other interested TIME AND DATE: July 18, 2006 at 11 a.m.
requirement, and therefore, SG waived PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW.,
parties are encouraged to file written
the issue. 19 CFR 210.43(b)(2). Washington, DC 20436, Telephone:
submissions on the issues of remedy,
In connection with the final
the public interest, and bonding. Such (202) 205–2000.
disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that submissions should address the STATUS: Open to the public.
could result in the exclusion of the recommended determination by the ALJ MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
subject articles from entry into the on remedy and bonding. Complainant 1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
United States, and/or (2) issue one or and the Commission investigative 2. Minutes.
more cease and desist orders that could attorney are also requested to submit 3. Ratification List.
result in the respondent being required proposed remedial orders for the 4. Inv. No. 731–TA–539–C (Second
to cease and desist from engaging in Commission’s consideration. Review) (Uranium from Russia)—
unfair acts in the importation and sale Complainant is also requested to state briefing and vote. (The Commission is
of such articles. Accordingly, the the dates that the patents expire and the currently scheduled to transmit its
Commission is interested in receiving HTSUS numbers under which the determination and Commissioners’
written submissions that address the accused products are imported. The opinions to the Secretary of Commerce
form of remedy, if any, that should be written submissions and proposed on or before August 1, 2006.)
ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an remedial orders must be filed no later 5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
article from entry into the United States than close of business on July 10, 2006. In accordance with Commission
for purposes other than entry for Reply submissions must be filed no later policy, subject matter listed above, not
consumption, the party should so than the close of business on July 17, disposed of at the scheduled meeting,
indicate and provide information 2006. No further submission on these may be carried over to the agenda of the
establishing that activities involving issues will be permitted unless following meeting.
other types of entry either are adversely otherwise ordered by the Commission. Issued: July 6, 2006.
affecting it or likely to do so. For Persons filing written submission By order of the Commission.
background, see Certain Devices for must file the original document and 12 Marilyn R. Abbott,
Connecting Computers via Telephone true copies thereof on or before the Secretary to the Commission.
Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC deadlines stated above with the Office [FR Doc. 06–6124 Filed 7–6–06; 12:54 pm]
Pub; No. 2843 (December 1994) of the Secretary. Any person desiring to
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
(Commission Opinion). submit a document to the Commission
If the Commission contemplates some in confidence must request confidential
form of remedy, it must consider the treatment unless the information has
effects of that remedy upon the public already been granted such treatment DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
interest. The factors the Commission during the proceedings. All such
will consider include the effect that an Mine Safety and Health Administration
requests should be directed to the
exclusion order and/or cease and desist Secretary of the Commission and must Section 110(c) of the Federal Mine
orders would have on (1) the public include a full statement of the reasons Safety and Health Act of 1977;
health and welfare, (2) competitive why the Commission should grant such Interpretation
conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. treatment. See 19 CFR 210.6. Documents
production of articles that are like or for which confidential treatment by the AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health
directly competitive with those that are Commission is sought will be treated Administration (MSHA), Department of
subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. accordingly. All nonconfidential written Labor.
consumers. The Commission is submissions will be available for public ACTION: Interpretive rule.
therefore interested in receiving written inspection at the Office of the Secretary.
submissions that address the SUMMARY: The Interpretive Bulletin
aforementioned public interest factors The authority for the Commission’s reproduced below sets forth a statement
in the context of this investigation. determination is contained in section of the Secretary of Labor’s interpretation
If the Commission orders some form 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as of Section 110(c) of the Federal Mine
of remedy, the U.S. Trade amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Representative, as delegated by the sections 210.42–46 and 210.50 of the Act), 30 U.S.C. 820(c), as it relates to
President, has 60 days to approve or Commission’s Rules of Practice and agents of Limited Liability Companies
disapprove the Commission’s action. Procedure (19 CFR 210.42–46 and (LLCs). The Interpretive Bulletin is
See Presidential Memorandum of July 210.50). considered an interpretive rule and
21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 2, 2005). Issued: June 30, 2006. provides an explanation of the
During this period, the subject articles Secretary’s interpretation of Section
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

By order of the Commission.

would be entitled to enter the United 110(c) and the rationale supporting that
Marilyn R. Abbott,
States under bond, in an amount interpretation. For the reasons set forth
determined by the Commission and Secretary to the Commission. below, the Secretary’s interpretation is
prescribed by the Secretary of the [FR Doc. 06–6081 Filed 7–7–06; 8:45 am] that Section 110(c) of the Mine Act is
Treasury. The Commission is therefore BILLING CODE 7020–02–M applicable to agents of LLCs.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:10 Jul 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\[Link] 10JYN1