lab on ME

© All Rights Reserved

97 views

lab on ME

© All Rights Reserved

- 05 Engineering and Design
- Variable Frecuency Drives Fir Centrifugal Pumps
- Constant Head Permability Test Report Outline
- Vsr Blaster Air Cannon
- Branchpipe Nozzles
- Determining NPSHA 4
- Permeability and Seepaage
- W7-1 Compressible Flow
- Bernoulli Equation
- Laval Nozzle Flow Calculations
- Centrifugal Pump
- Hydraulics 2006 Exam
- FINSET3_data.xlsx
- HGL & EGL Test Comparison
- TinyPermManual.pdf
- Pumping Main Design (1)
- Energy Efficiency 3
- 03 Basics of Hydrodynamics
- chapter 2
- Resistance and Equivalent Length of Fittings

You are on page 1of 8

**************************

Air flow test rig

1. Foreword

The information is set out as follows: section 1 geves a general description of the equipment.

Sections 2 to 8 give, respectively, accounts of the following tests: flow through a parabolic nozzle; flow

throung a sudden enlargement, with pressure recovery; the velocity profile during turbulent flow through a

pipe, observed; the friction in a smooth pipe, the velocity profile, theoretical; losses in various pipe fittings;

the characteristics of the fan with various forms of impeller. In an Appendix instructions for operating the

equipment are added.

1. General

The Pipe Flow and nozzle Apparatus is designed to enable the flow of gas through nozzles,

pipes and other forms to be studied experimentally at Reynolds Numbers up to 200,000. Air is the medium

and this is drawn through the apparatus by means of a centrifugal fan, the characteristics of which may also

be studied.

The apparatus is shown in Fig.1, the principal component being the length of smooth-walled circular

brass pipe, into which air is drawn at the left and from which it is discharged by the fan at the right. At entry

the air passes through a parabolic nozzle, in which the pressures are observed by an axial probe. The

pressures at one point in the nozzle and several points in the pipe are observed by means of series of

piezometer rings in the wall. The pressures in the pipe cover three regimes: the pressure recovery after the

nozzle, a setting length, and a length in which the flow of air is turbulent but steady for observation of pipe

friction. Following this part, a perspex block is provided in which is mounted a total head tube which, with

the aid of a micromoter screw, may be traversed across the tube. Between this block and the fan it is possible

to insert for investigation venturi tubes and orifices of various forms, which their pressure tappings. The

pressure tappings are all led to an inclined water manometer.

With the parabolic nozzle, which has a throat diameter of 2 in, Reynolds Hmbers of up to 140,000

may be attained a further nozzle having a bore of 3 in is also supplied and is shown in Fig1A. This nozzle is

designed in accordance with the recommendations of British Standard 1042 Part1: 1984 and is known as an

ISA 1932 nozzle. This nozzle imposes less restriction on the flow and henco permits Reynolds Numbers of

up to 200,000.

The losses taking place in various fittings can be found by attaching them to the inlet to the pipe and

fitting the 3 in diameter nozzle to the inlet end of the component under examination. Then for a given rate of

flow as measured by the nozzle the losses are determined by observing the pressure gradient in the pipe.

The dimensions of the nozzele and the pipe, and the positions of the pressure tappings in the nozzle, the

pipe, and the fan are given in Figs.1A and 2.

In what follows the theoretical background is not given in Frank M. White: Fluid Mechanics, 5th Edition,

McGrawHill. The relevant page numbers are given in brackets.

3. VELOCITY PROFILE, OBSERVED

The velocity traverse is situated at a distance of 240.4 in., or 78 pipe diameters, downstream of the

pipe entrance, a distance sufficient the ensure fully developed flow at this point. Velocity head is measured

by means of an open ended total head tube, facing the air flow, of outer diameter 0.035 in and bore 0.020 in.

Let: D = pipe diameter, ft

V = flow velocity, ft/sec

3

2 = density of air at plane of traverse, lb/ft

B = Atmospheric pressure, in of Hg

H = static depression at traverse, in of water

h2 = total head reading at traverse, in of water

p3 = static pressure at plane of traverse, lb/ft2

R = Gas constant, 96 ft-lb/(lb OK)

Then neglecting compressibility (p.37)

V

2 g ( H h2 ) 5.20

(1)

Assuming isothermal expansion from atmospheric pressure to the conditions obtaining at the traverse

plane:

2

p3

R TA

70.72 B 5.2 H

96 T A

..(2)

T A ( H h2 )

21.32

67.3 ft / sec

B 0.0735H

Velocity is plotted against radius in Fig.7 and against (radius) 2 in Fig.8. The mean ordinate of the

latter curve, 89.1 ft/sec, gives the mean velocity at this cross section.

Q

29.6

4.56

ft 3 / sec

This agrees well with the calculated flow volume for the nozzle, 4.47 ft3/sec, and suggests that, for

the latter, a coefficient of discharge of substantially 1.00 is applicable instead of the assumed value of 0.985.

Let: V = velocity at radius r ft, in ft/sec

R = radius of pipe, ft

2

o = shear stress at the pipe surface, lb/ft

r = any radius, ft

The semi-theoretical equation for velocity profile (p.359) is:

V

0g

2

and

o g

5.6161 log

0.129 r 5.0

p R2

l 2R

p R

l 2

.. (3)

(4)

p

l

0.50 lb / ft 3 ,

R 0.129 ft,

0.0739 lb / ft 3

V = 21.6 log (23,900 (0.129 - r)) + 18.745

This equation is plotted in Fig.7, and shows good agreement of the observed velocity profile with the

theoretical one.

and

5. LOSSES IN FITTINGS

The fittings investigated by the method mentioned earlier, and shown diagrammatically in Fig.9,

were :

(a) Bend, (b) Plain Elbow, (c) Cascaded Elbow, (d) 10 ft length of sound absorbing pipe followed

by bend.

The rate of flow was kept constant throughout these tests by adjusting the diaphragm value on the fan

outlet.

head 1.13 in of water, giving :

TA 292 K , B 29.60

72

in of mercury,

velocity

ft / sec

In Fig.10 static depression is plotted against distance from pipe inlet for the five combinations given.

It will be observed that, particularly after the elbows, irregularities occur in the pressure gradient in the earlier

part of the pipe. By the time pressure tapping No.8 is reached, however, the pressure gradient is substantially

uniform, and losses in the various combinations are compared on the basis of readings taken at this point,

with other results given in the first two columns of the table. The values for head loss, expressed as a

proportion of mean velocity head, are given in the third column.

Proportion of mean velocity head

Considerations

Head Loss in of Water

(Loss coefficient K)

(a) bend

0.06

0.053

(b) plain elbow

0.49

0.43

(c) cascaded elbow

0.31

0.27

(d) bend + sound absorbing pipe

0.81

0.717

These results indicate that the losses in a cascaded elbow with while losses in bend are much lower.

The pressure gradient in the brass pipe for fully developed flow at this velocity is: 0.081 in of water

per foot. For the sound absorbing pipe the loss is 0.8110 0.06 = 0.075 in of water per foot. Losses in the

sound absorbing pipe are, therefore, slightly less than in the brass pipe.

It is convenient to express the losses due to each fitting as loss coefficient K, (p.385).

traverse plane perspective block Red 105

2. Fittings losses Fittings 3 (a) Bend (b) Plain Elbow (c)

Cascaded Elbow ( 9) ,

Fitting 1 Fitting nozzle head

2. (3)

3. ()2 excel

Vi dAi

1

V

V dA

A

A

Vi 2ri ri

i 1

R 2

V 2r r

i

i 1

R2

2

R2

V r r

i i

i 1

4. 3

5. ISA-1932 Nozzle.

V Nozzle 6.497

h

(t 273)

m / s 21.32 Nozzle air

ft / s

B 0.0735hStatic

B 0.0735hStatic

Q R 2V Nozzle

1.5 HP MOTOR

PROBE SUPPORT

SUDDEN

ENLARGEMENT

DIFFUSER

PARABOLIC NOZZLE

PRESSURE TAPPINGS, PRESSURE

RECOVERY REGION

IN PERSPEX BLOCK

PRESSURE GRADIENT

PRESSURE TRAVERSE

PIPE BORE 3.1 IN. (78.8 MM)

FIG 1 APPARATUS

CONTROL

VELOCITY PROFILE

100

MEAN VELOCITY =

88.7 ft/sec

80

VELOCITY, ft/sec

60

EQUAL AREA

40

20

0

1.0

2.0

2.4

(RADIUS)2 in2

FIG 8 VELOCITY VS (RADIUS)2

BEND

CASCADED ELBOW

PLAIN ELBOW

R 0.600

2.50

R 1.00

2.25

3.000.001

Unit: inch

Nozzle and Pitot tube

Nozzle

Flow

hNozzle

Inclined Manometer

Pitot tube

Flow

hTotal

2

hStatic

Pitot tube

VPitot

2 water ghvel

air

2 water ghvel

Pair

RTair

2 (1 gm / cm 3 ) g (hvel mm)

( Hg gB water ghstatic )

(0.287kJ / kgK ) (tair 273) K

2 (1 gm / cm 3 ) (hvel mm)

(13.6 gm / cm 3 ) ( B mm) (1 gm / cm 3 ) (hstatic mm)

(287 J / kg ) (tair 273)

2 (1 ) (hvel )

Nm / kg

(13.6 ) ( B) hstatic

(287) (tair 273)

6.497

m /s

13.6 ( B 0.0735hstatic )

hvel (tair 273)

m / s 21.32

ft / s

B 0.0735hstatic

B 0.0735hstatic

Nozzle

VNozzle 6.497

hNozzle(tair 273)

h

(t 273)

m / s 21.32 Nozzle air

ft / s

B 0.0735hStatic

B 0.0735hStatic

- 05 Engineering and DesignUploaded byKarthy Ganesan
- Variable Frecuency Drives Fir Centrifugal PumpsUploaded byLeon Sanchez
- Constant Head Permability Test Report OutlineUploaded byMary Manaoag Brutas
- Vsr Blaster Air CannonUploaded bykING
- Branchpipe NozzlesUploaded bychinitn
- Determining NPSHA 4Uploaded bydk4monjure
- Permeability and SeepaageUploaded byCésar Torres Paitan
- W7-1 Compressible FlowUploaded byHariss Hafiz
- Bernoulli EquationUploaded byNiroex
- Laval Nozzle Flow CalculationsUploaded byMatiasGuerrero
- Centrifugal PumpUploaded bySouvik Singharoy
- Hydraulics 2006 ExamUploaded byMohafisto Sofisto
- FINSET3_data.xlsxUploaded byAnkur Bhatnagar
- HGL & EGL Test ComparisonUploaded byGiovanni Castelblanco
- TinyPermManual.pdfUploaded bydertek
- Pumping Main Design (1)Uploaded byKishore Ainavilli
- Energy Efficiency 3Uploaded byUallace Reis
- 03 Basics of HydrodynamicsUploaded byloveah
- chapter 2Uploaded byAzreenoor Atieqah
- Resistance and Equivalent Length of FittingsUploaded byyarzar17
- FM4Uploaded byWen Hong
- Culvert USGSUploaded byGneis Setia Graha
- CE SET_1_GATE_2015Uploaded byJaved Iqbal
- f 7721 NozzleUploaded byMichael Thomas
- Open Channel NotesUploaded bymanneli talpagiri
- FM All Question PapersUploaded byMallikarjunGBhure
- FM-II Week11 NormalShock.pdfUploaded byBilal Ghani
- Take Home Quiz Rev.1 (1)Uploaded byGenrei Lintao
- Fluid Mechanics Formula Book-watermark (1).pdf-97.pdfUploaded byAnshul Badoni
- n5375e8cdc19f7.pdfUploaded bySumit Kumar Pandey

- Steam Pipe CalculationUploaded byherberthhp
- Evap DaigamUploaded byตุ๊กตุ้ย ตัวกลมกลม
- 7. CogenerationUploaded byaasim007
- Stor ColdstorescasestudyUploaded byตุ๊กตุ้ย ตัวกลมกลม
- Particitpants InformationUploaded byตุ๊กตุ้ย ตัวกลมกลม
- Economizer.docxUploaded byตุ๊กตุ้ย ตัวกลมกลม
- Economize rUploaded byตุ๊กตุ้ย ตัวกลมกลม
- air_propUploaded byWrya Saeed
- converted-090520162205773Uploaded byตุ๊กตุ้ย ตัวกลมกลม
- Manual onUploaded byamol76
- Giz2016 en Energy Cogeneration Trigeneration GuideUploaded byตุ๊กตุ้ย ตัวกลมกลม
- Chapter 7 WebUploaded byตุ๊กตุ้ย ตัวกลมกลม
- IP-29 - CHP CalculationsUploaded byตุ๊กตุ้ย ตัวกลมกลม
- Co Generation Feasibility GuideUploaded byTofanB
- Educogen Cogen GuideUploaded byMag Racing
- 1966_Jachens_Steam Turbines Their ConstructionUploaded byVikash Pattanaik
- Piping Support and FlexibilityUploaded byAmr Metwally Anwar
- Ba 2512341250Uploaded bymutashima
- Cold storage_08Uploaded byavinram
- Pipeline EngineeringUploaded byHenry Qin
- energycenter-130515101953Uploaded byตุ๊กตุ้ย ตัวกลมกลม
- hahaUploaded byตุ๊กตุ้ย ตัวกลมกลม
- Zbr-mdhht_how to SizeUploaded byfarhadmrt6923

- ASTM D4439-02Uploaded byanon_128393458
- Fmhm Two Marks Questions MaterialUploaded byravikumar
- Lecture12 dewatering.pdfUploaded byparamarthasom1974
- All Chilll Water Products Manual 2008Uploaded byPatricia D Garcia
- Bernoulli EqnUploaded bylitrakhan
- Rain Loads 1611 From IBCUploaded byJim Gregson
- CHE241 - Lab Report Flowmeter MeasuremenUploaded byAnonymous dHADQR
- How to Calculate the NPSH of Pump in HYSYSUploaded byAnonymous jqevOeP7
- Chapter 5Uploaded byjonaspd
- ABS CatalogUploaded byGianKarloSicat
- spreadsheet use for pipe frictionUploaded byRohan Arora
- Siphonic Roof Drainage (m256content)Uploaded byCzarSAS
- notes_answers.pdfUploaded bykbkwebs
- Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data.pdfUploaded byAnonymous hE0IDl7
- Pressure Drop Evaluation Along PipelinesUploaded byaqhammam
- Seepage and Pore Pressure Around PileUploaded bytamlb0507
- y1 pumpsUploaded byDeepak Rana
- GA PPTUploaded byMani Gandan
- 2134Uploaded byKS Chong
- Fuel Oil SystemUploaded byprasetyo
- Fluid MechanicsUploaded byjhc1123
- Pipe friction loss in smooth bore pipeUploaded byAdnAnKhan
- Unit 1 Variable Head Type FlowmetersUploaded byShivam Vishvakarma
- Drip Irrigation 2014Uploaded bymosne1
- ME 2204 Fluid Mechanics NotesUploaded byPraveen Raj
- Fluid Mechanic ExperimentUploaded byndoan_44
- 13Jun_Sanfirorenzo_CIVINS.pdfUploaded byeragorn
- Correction FactorUploaded byAdwaith Gupta
- Pipe Flow-Friction Factor Calculations With ExcelUploaded bymichael_mic99
- All System Pump Head LoosUploaded byEngFaisal Alrai

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.