You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Notices 14545

have not satisfied the domestic industry Taiwan; TEAC Corp. of Tokyo, Japan; or February 17, 2006, under section 337 of
requirement with respect to those Ultima Electronics Corp. of Taipei the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
patents. He also found that the asserted Hsien, Taiwan (collectively, with U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Linear
claims of the ‘440 and ‘736 patents are MediaTek, Inc. ‘‘respondents’’). Id. The Technology Corporation of Milpitas,
not invalid and that those patents are Commission also determined to issue California. Letters supplementing the
not unenforceable. cease and desist orders directed to complaint were filed on March 13 and
On May 27, 2005, complainants and Artronix Technology, Inc.; ASUSTek 14, 2006. The complaint, as
nineteen respondents each petitioned Computer, Inc.; ASUS Computer supplemented, alleges violations of
for review of portions of the final ID. On International; MSI Computer section 337 in the importation into the
July 19, 2005, the Commission Corporation; TEAC America Inc.; EPO United States, the sale for importation,
determined to review the ID in part. 70 Science and Technology, Inc.; and and the sale within the United States
FR 42589–91. Specifically, the LITE–ON Information Technology Corp. after importation of certain voltage
Commission determined to review the Id. regulators, components thereof and
ID’s findings of fact and conclusions of On February 10, 2006, complainants products containing same by reason of
law with respect to the ‘527 and ‘440 Zoran and Oak and respondent infringement of claims 1–14 and 23–35
patents. Id. The Commission MediaTek filed, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. of U.S. Patent No. 6,411,531 and claims
determined not to review the ID’s 1337(k) and Commission rule 210.76(a) 1–19, 31, 34, and 35 of U.S. Patent No.
findings of fact and conclusions of law (19 CFR 210.76(a)), a joint petition for 6,580,258. The complaint further alleges
with respect to the ‘736 patent, thereby rescission of the limited exclusion order that an industry in the United States
adopting them. Id. Accordingly, the and the cease and desist orders issued exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of
Commission found no violation of in the investigation based on a section 337.
section 337 with respect to the ‘736 settlement agreement that resolves the The complainant requests that the
patent. Id. The Commission also underlying dispute between all of the Commission institute an investigation
determined to review and modify the ID parties, including all of the other and, after the investigation, issue a
to clarify that respondents accused of respondents. On February 22, 2006, the permanent exclusion order and a cease
infringing only the asserted claims of Commission investigative attorney filed and desist order.
the ‘736 patent (viz., respondents a response supporting the joint petition. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
Audiovox Corporation; Initial Having reviewed the parties’ any confidential information contained
Technology, Inc.; Mintek Digital, Inc.; submissions, the Commission has therein, is available for inspection
Shinco International AV Co., Ltd.; determined that the settlement during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
Changzhou Shinco Digital Technology agreement satisfies the requirement of to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Shinco Electronic Commission rule 210.76(a)(1), 19 CFR Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Group Co., Ltd.; Terapin Technology 210.76(a)(1), for changed conditions of Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
Pte., Ltd. [formerly known as Teraoptix fact or law. The Commission therefore 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
d/b/a Terapin Technology] of Singapore; has issued an order rescinding the 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
and Terapin Technology U.S. [formerly remedial orders previously issued in individuals are advised that information
also known as Teraoptix]) are not in this investigation. on this matter can be obtained by
violation of section 337. Id. This action is taken under the contacting the Commission’s TDD
On review, the Commission authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
determined that there was a violation of of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) and with mobility impairments who will
section 337 as to claim 3 of the ‘527 § 210.76(a)(1) of the Commission’s Rules need special assistance in gaining access
patent, but no violation of the statute as of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR to the Commission should contact the
to the remaining claims in issue of the 210.76(a)(1)). Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
‘527 patent (viz., claims 1 and 2) and no General information concerning the
violation as to the claims in issue of the By order of the Commission.
Commission may also be obtained by
‘440 patent (viz., claims 1, 5, 7, 8, 10, Issued: March 17, 2006.
accessing its Internet server at http://
13, 14, 19, and 21). 70 FR 57620. On Marilyn R. Abbott, www.usitc.gov. The public record for
September 28, 2005, the Commission Secretary to the Commission. this investigation may be viewed on the
determined that the appropriate form of [FR Doc. E6–4154 Filed 3–21–06; 8:45 am] Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
relief is a limited exclusion order BILLING CODE 7020–02–P at http://edis.usitc.gov.
prohibiting the unlicensed entry of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
chips or chipsets covered by claim 3 of
David Hollander, Esq., Office of Unfair
the ‘527 patent manufactured abroad or INTERNATIONAL TRADE
imported by or on behalf of MediaTek, Import Investigations, U.S. International
COMMISSION Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–
Inc. of Hsin-Chu City, Taiwan, and
optical storage devices containing such [Inv. No. 337–TA–564] 2746.
covered chips or chipsets that are Authority: The authority for institution of
In the Matter of Certain Voltage this investigation is contained in section 337
manufactured abroad or imported by or
Regulators, Components Thereof and of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
on behalf of Artronix Technology, Inc.
Products Containing Same; Notice of in § 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of
of Brea, California; ASUSTek Computer, Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
Investigation
Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; ASUS Computer (2005).
International of Fremont, California; AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
MSI Computer Corporation of City of Scope of Investigation: Having
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Commission.
Industry, California; TEAC America Inc. ACTION: Institution of investigation considered the complaint, the U.S.
of Montebello, California; EPO Science pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. International Trade Commission, on
and Technology, Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; March 16, 2006, ordered that—
LITE-ON Information Technology Corp. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
of Taipei, Taiwan; Micro-Star complaint was filed with the U.S. section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
International Co., Ltd. of Taipei Hsien, International Trade Commission on amended, an investigation be instituted

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:47 Mar 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1
14546 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 22, 2006 / Notices

to determine whether there is a and to enter both an initial The Department of Justice will receive
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of determination and a final determination for a period of thirty (30) days from the
section 337 in the importation into the containing such findings, and may date of this publication comments
United States, the sale for importation, result in the issuance of a permanent relating to the consent decrees.
or the sale within the United States after exclusion order or cease and desist Comments should be addressed to the
importation of certain voltage order or both directed against the Assistant Attorney General,
regulators, components thereof or respondent. Environment and Natural Resources
products containing same by reason of By order of the Commission. Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
infringement of one or more of claims Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Issued: March 17, 2006.
1–14 and 23–35 of U.S. Patent No. 20044–7611, and should refer to United
Marilyn R. Abbott,
6,411,531 and claims 1–19, 31, 34, and States v. James H. Pflueger, et al., D.J.
35 of U.S. Patent No. 6,580,258, and Secretary to the Commission. Ref. No. 90–5–1–1–07871.
whether an industry in the United [FR Doc. E6–4155 Filed 3–21–06; 8:45 am] During the public comment period,
States exists as required by subsection BILLING CODE 7020–02–P the consent decrees may be examined
(a)(2) of section 337. on the following Department of Justice
(2) For the purpose of the Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
investigation so instituted, the following DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE open.html. Copies of the consent
are hereby named as parties upon which decrees may also be obtained by mail
this notice of investigation shall be Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree from the Consent Decree Library, P.O.
served: Under the Clean Water Act and Rivers Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice,
(a) The complainant is—Linear and Harbors Act Washington, DC 20044–7611, or by
Technology Corporation, 1630 faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
McCarthy Boulevard, Milpitas, Notice is hereby given that on March
9, 2006, a consent decree in United Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
California 95035. fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone
(b) The respondent is the following States v. James H. Pflueger, et al., Civil
Action No. 06–00140 SPK BMK, was confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
entity alleged to be in violation of requesting a copy, please enclose a
section 337, and is the party upon lodged with the United States District
Court for the District of Hawaii. check in the amount of $14.75 (25 cents
which the complaint is to be served: per page reproduction cost) payable to
Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc., The complaint, filed concurrently
with lodging of the consent decree, was the U.S. Treasury, for a copy of the
830 East Arques Avenue, Sunnyvale, consent decree without attachments.
California 94085. brought on behalf of the Environmental
Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’) and the Requesters who desire copies of the
(c) David H. Hollander, Jr., Esq.,
State of Hawaii, Department of Health, attachments (which include oversize
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
under Sections 309 and 504 of the Clean and color materials) should call to make
U.S. International Trade Commission,
Water Act (‘‘CWA’’), 33 U.S.C. 1319 & separate arrangements for reproduction,
500 E Street, SW., Suite 401,
1364, Section 13 of the Rivers & Harbors which will be charged at the cost for
Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the
Act of 1899 (‘‘R&HA’’), 33 U.S.C. 407, outside commercial copying.
Commission investigative attorney,
party to this investigation; and and State law. The complaint alleges Henry Friedman,
(3) For the investigation so instituted, that defendants James H. Pflueger, Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
the Honorable Sidney Harris is Pflueger Properties, and Pilaa 400 LLC Section, Environment and Natural Resources
designated as the presiding illegally discharged storm water Division.
administrative law judge. associated with their construction [FR Doc. 06–2776 Filed 3–21–06; 8:45 am]
A response to the complaint and the activities on the Island of Kauai, Hawaii, BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
notice of investigation must be and seeks civil penalties and injunctive
submitted by the named respondent in relief. The federal claims in the
accordance with § 210.13 of the proposed complaint also include a DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Commission’s Rules of Practice and claim for injunctive relief under R&HA
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to Section 13, 33 U.S.C. 407, to address Employment and Training
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such sediment discharges from defendants’ Administration
response will be considered by the property, and claims for civil penalties
and injunctive relief for defendants’ [TA–W–54,242 and TA–W–54,242A]
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the placement of unpermitted fill in stream Badger Paper Mills, Inc., Pestigo, WI,
Commission of the complaint and the courses on their property, in violation of and Oconto Falls, WI; Amended
notice of investigation. Extensions of CWA Section 404. Finally, the Certification Regarding Eligibility to
time for submitting a response to the complaint includes state claims for Apply for Worker Adjustment
complaint and the notice of violations of state storm water and water Assistance and Alternative Trade
investigation will not be granted unless quality regulations. Adjustment Assistance
good cause therefor is shown. The consent decree requires
Failure of the respondent to file a defendants to pay a $2 million civil In accordance with section 223 of the
timely response to each allegation in the penalty and to perform a Supplemental Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
complaint and in this notice may be Environmental Project designed to section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
deemed to constitute a waiver of the reduce the inflow of pollution to U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
right to appear and contest the receiving waters and improve water Department of Labor issued a split
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

allegations of the complaint and this quality, at an estimated cost of determination regarding workers’
notice, and to authorize the $200,000. Finally, the decree requires eligibility to apply for benefits available
administrative law judge and the defendants to complete measures under the Trade Adjustment Assistance
Commission, without further notice to necessary to abate further discharges of (TAA) Program. On March 22, 2004, the
the respondent, to find the facts to be as pollution and to repair the damage done Department certified workers of Badger
alleged in the complaint and this notice to waterways on their property. Paper Mills, Inc., Peshtigo, Wisconsin as

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:47 Mar 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1