2 views

Uploaded by Mohinuddin Ahmed

ScenarioKoreanNuclearPlants

- CLAIT Certificate, Tutor marking templates
- Seismic Aspects of Underground Structures of Hydropower Plants
- Fault and Seismic Hazard Investigation_VVI
- A_Time_Dependent_Probabilistic_Seismic_H (3).pdf
- 20091006-SS-Pp46-50-Applying Integrated Ecological Planning and ALIT
- Deterministic Response Spectrum V2!02!21-12
- (Paper) Design of Tunnel Under Seismic Condition
- V 2154 101 a 217 B_Mechanical Calculation (T 1301)
- lecture16-PSHA-part1
- BSSA_Design_Earthquakes.pdf
- Earthquake
- Nepal Earthquake
- JOU_EQ Analysis of structure by Base Isolation technique in SAP.pdf
- Indian Tsunami Warning system latest
- 1963 Skopje
- Bankers Adda_ Quiz_ Reading Comprehension May 5
- lec15.pdf
- omn-seismic.pdf
- Earthquake Plate 4
- Gomez 2014

You are on page 1of 8

Prague, Czech Republic, August 17 22, 2003

Paper # K03-2

Scenario Earthquakes for Korean Nuclear Power Plant Site Considering Active

Faults

In-Kil Choi1), Young-Sun Choun1) , Jeong-Moon Seo1)

1)

ABSTRACT

Scenario earthquakes have been used for the design and safety assessment of nuclear power plant structures and

equipments. Scenario earthquakes can be obtained from the deaggregation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

(PSHA) results. In this study, the probability based scenario earthquakes were developed for the Korean nuclear

power plant site using the PSHA data. The magnitude and distance bins of the scenario earthquakes for the example

Korean nuclear power plant site were M6.4, 9km and M6.2, 13km. The ground response spectra for the scenario

earthquakes were developed using the attenuation equations adopted in PSHA (Probabilistic Seismic Hazard

Analysis). To incorporate the near-fault earthquake effects, the ground response spectra were modified by the

correction factor.

KEY WORDS : scenario earthquakes, probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, hazard de-aggregation, control

earthquakes, near-fault, ground response spectrum

INTRODUCTION

The seismic analysis and design have been performed based on a design basis earthquake. The design basis

earthquake ground motion is generally specified as the design response spectrum. However the seismic safety of a

nuclear power plant can not be secured by considering only the design basis earthquake, since the seismological

situation of the nuclear power plant site is changed during the development of geosciences.

A survey on some of the Quaternary fault segments near the Korean nuclear power plants is ongoing [1]. It is

likely that these faults would be identified as active ones. If the faults are confirmed as active ones, it will be

necessary to reevaluate the seismic safety of nuclear power plants located near the fault.

This study is to develop the scenario earthquakes for the reevaluation of seismic safety of the nuclear power plant

near the active fault. The probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for most of the Korean NPP sites have been completed.

The hazard consistent earthquake scenario is developed as the probability based earthquake scenario using the

existing results of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis.

The scenario earthquake is specified in terms of the earthquake magnitude, M, and its distance, R, from the site

under consideration. The probability based scenario earthquake is developed by the de-aggregation of the probabilistic

seismic hazard analysis results according to the procedures of the US NRC R.G. 1.165 [2]. The spectral shape for the

scenario earthquake is developed using the attenuation equations adopted in PSHA. The near-fault ground motion

effect is incorporated into the response spectra, since the potential active fault is located near the nuclear power plant

site. Near-fault ground motions have caused much damage in the vicinity of seismic sources during recent

earthquakes. This is due to the pulse-type ground motion, which has a large amount of input energy. Finally, this

study proposes the scenario earthquake for the nuclear power plant site and corresponding response spectra

considering the potential active fault effect.

SCENARIO EARTHQUAKE DEVELOPMENT METHODS

Scenario Earthquakes

Tow typical method, probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and deterministic seismic hazard analysis, are

generally used to define the scenario earthquakes. The purpose of the seismic hazard analysis is to evaluate the annual

probability of exceedance of various earthquake sizes at a given site, and to develop the spectral shapes of the motion

from these earthquakes. This is called a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis to emphasize that its results are

intrinsically probabilistic in nature. The seismic hazard of a nuclear power plant site is generally described by a series

of seismic hazard curves, that is, a plot of the probability of exceedance vs. the ground motion intensity, such as peak

ground acceleration, velocity or spectral acceleration. PSHA is very useful to define the scenario earthquakes, since it

can determine the annual probability of exceedance for a ground motion intensity parameter [3].

The concept of the probability based scenario earthquake originates from McGuire studies [4]. The probability

based scenario earthquakes can be obtained from the de-aggregation of the PSHA results. It is intended to obtain

particular sets of earthquake source magnitude and distance for the specified probability level. Two typical methods

for defining the probability based scenario earthquakes are generally used. The first one is the method developed by

U.S. NRC. PSHA can provide important information to define the safe shutdown earthquakes (SSE) in the recent

revision of U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.165 [2]. The scenario earthquakes are called controlling earthquakes in the

Regulatory Guide. The second one was developed by Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute [5,6] base on the

Ishikawa and Kameda study [7].

The two procedures mentioned above were adopted to define the scenario earthquakes for the example site by

Takada et al. [8]. This study shows that both methods generate the similar results. But the authors point out the

methodological difference between them. The U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.165 procedure can not identify the

earthquake source location of the scenario earthquakes. And this procedure uses coarser bins for the earthquake

magnitude and distances, and all results including earthquake source regions and faults are mixed up in the bins. The

Ishikawas procedure [7] has the advantage that it produces the source contribution factors that is an effective

indicator for identifying which earthquake sources and/or which fault(s) are most influential, and one or more

scenario earthquakes can be determined. Finally, it is concluded that the U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.165 procedure

gives a global view of the scenario earthquakes, while the Ishikawas procedure provides a more precise view of the

scenario earthquakes.

US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.165 Procedure

This procedure is originally an approach for determining the controlling earthquakes. In this study, the scenario

earthquakes for a Korean nuclear power plant site were developed using this procedure. This procedure is based on a

de-aggregation of the probabilistic seismic hazard in terms of earthquake magnitudes and distances. This section gives

a simple description of the procedure [2].

Step 1 : Perform a site-specific PSHA. The hazard assessment (mean, median, 85th percentile, and 15th percentile)

should be performed at 1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 25Hz, and the peak ground acceleration. A lower bound

magnitude of 5.0 is recommended.

Step 2 : Using the reference probability, determine the ground motion levels for the spectral accelerations at 1, 2.5,

5, and 10Hz from the total median hazard obtained in Step 1. Calculate the average of the ground motion

level for the 1 and 2.5 Hz and the 5 and 10 Hz spectral acceleration pairs.

Step 3 : Perform a complete probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for each of the magnitude-distance bins.

Step 4 : From the de-aggregated results of Step 3, the median annual probability of exceeding the ground motion

levels of Step 2 are determined for each magnitude-distance bin. Using the median annual probability,

the fractional contribution of each magnitude and distance bin to the total hazard for the average of 1 and

2.5Hz, and 5 and 10Hz, respectively.

Step 5 : Review the magnitude-distance distribution for the average of 1 and 2.5 Hz to determine whether the

contribution to the hazard for distances of 100 km or greater is substantial. If the contribution to the

hazard for distances of 100 km or greater exceeds 5%, additional calculations are needed to determine

the controlling earthquakes using the magnitude-distance distribution for distances greater than 100 km.

Step 6 : Calculate the mean magnitude and distance of the controlling earthquake associated with the ground

motions determined in Step 2 for the average of 5 and 10 Hz.

Step 7 : If the contribution to the hazard calculated in Step 5for distances of 100 km or greater exceeds 5% for the

average of 1 and 2.5 Hz, calculate the mean magnitude and distance of the controlling earthquakes

associated with the ground motions determined in Step 2 for the average of 1 and 2.5 Hz.

Step 8 : Determine the SSE response spectrum.

In this study, the probability based scenario earthquakes for a Korean NPP site were developed using the method

proposed by the U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.165[2]. The example NPP site is located in the southeastern part of

Korean peninsular.

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

The probabilistic seismic hazard analysis was performed for the NPP site. The team approach developed by EPRI

(Electric Power Research Institute) was adopted for the hazard analysis. Three seismicity expert teams and one

attenuation team were composed to obtain the PSHA input parameters. At least one non-seismologist was included in

each seismicity team. However, in the attenuation team, only one expert recommended several different attenuation

equations with weight [9].

A questionnaire was made and distributed to the team. The contents of the questionnaire are as follows.

- Seismicity

1) Matrix of physical characteristics

2) Assessment of tectonic features according to the matrix of physical characteristics

3) Seismic source (source zone) and their inter-dependency

4) Maximum magnitude of each zone

5) Seismic parameters of each zone

6) Backup data (or interpretation) on the given figures

- Attenuation (Strong ground motion)

1) Equations and their weights

2) Background

Fig. 1 shows one of the seismic source maps which was used for the evaluation of seismicity by the expert team.

Table 1 shows the attenuation equations recommended by the expert. As shown in this table, the attenuation expert

recommended three attenuation equations for the peak ground acceleration and three attenuation equations for the

spectral acceleration with individual weight.

Using these PSHA input data proposed by the expert teams, the PSHA was performed for the site. Fig. 2 shows

the seismic hazard curves for the example NPP site.

Scenario Earthquakes

The seismic hazard was de-aggregated to determine dominant magnitudes and distances at the prescribed

exceedance level. In this study, the seismic hazard was de-aggregated at 1Hz, 5Hz, and 10Hz at the 10-5 exceedance

level according to the U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.165 [2]. According to the guide, the seismic hazard should also

be de-aggregated at 2.5Hz. But the ground motion attenuation equations proposed by the expert did not include the

equation for 2.5Hz. The fractional contribution of magnitudes and distance bin to the total hazard for 1Hz was used

for the development of a low frequency scenario earthquake. Because the contribution of the distance bins greater

than 100km contained less than 5% of the total hazard for the 1Hz, additional calculations to consider the effects of

distant and larger events were not needed.

Fig. 3 and 4 show the contribution of magnitude and distance bins for 1Hz and the average of the 5Hz and 10Hz,

respectively. The scenario earthquakes for the example site were determined based on the contribution. Table 2 shows

the magnitude and distance of scenario earthquakes for the example Korean NPP site. As shown in this table, the

magnitudes and distances of the scenario earthquakes are very similar. It may be due to the small contribution of

distant earthquakes of the 1Hz scenario earthquake.

Near-fault Ground Motion Effects

Near-fault ground motions are ground motions that occur near an earthquake fault. In general, the near-fault

ground motion records exhibit a distinctive long period pulse like time history with very high peak velocities. These

features are induced by the slip of the earthquake fault. Near-fault ground motions, which have caused much of the

damage in recent major earthquakes (Northridge 1994, Kobe 1995, Chi-Chi 1999), can be characterized by a pulselike motion that exposes the structure to high input energy at the beginning of the motion. The recorded acceleration

response spectra of recent major earthquakes are well enveloped by the design response spectra of the codes in the

medium to high frequency range, but not in the low to medium frequency range [10].

The near-fault effects such as pulse-like motions can dramatically influence spectral content in large earthquakes.

Some of these effects are most pronounced within about 10 km. The fault normal component is about 30% larger than

the fault parallel component in the frequency range 0.2 to 0.5 sec due primarily to rupture directivity. The rupture

directivity effects are strongest for strike slip motion on vertical faults but can also be significant for cases of

directivity for sites located near dipping faults. Other factors, perhaps strongest at close distances, include hanging

wall/foot wall site location as well as thrust verses strike slip or normal slip mechanisms. These additional factors can

have significant impacts on spectral composition [11].

RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR SCENARIO EARTHQUAKES

The spectral shape for the scenario earthquakes were developed using the attenuation equations proposed in the

PSHA study. The spectral shapes for the scenario earthquakes normalized to 0.2g ZPA (Zero Period Acceleration) are

shown in Fig. 5. The spectral shapes for WUS (Western US) and CEUS (Central and Eastern US) are also shown in

Fig. 5 for comparison. The seismic response spectral shapes for design and analysis for WUS and CEUS sites were

proposed by McGuire et al. [11,12]. The response spectral shapes for the WUS site were developed from empirical

attenuation equations in the WUS. For the CEUS, the WUS spectral shapes were modified with a transfer function

based on the random vibration model of strong ground motion that accounts for differences in source parameters,

crustal damping, and near-surface damping. The spectral shapes for the WUS and CEUS sites can be obtained from

the following equations, respectively.

ln[SA( f ) / PGA] =

exp(C5 f )

C1

+ C4

C3

C6

cosh(C2 f )

f

exp(C5 f ) C7 exp(C8 f )

C1

ln[SA( f ) / PGA] =

+ C4

+

C3

C6

cosh(C2 f )

f C9

f

(1)

1/ 2

(2)

where, SA( f ) and f are the spectral accelerations and frequencies, respectively. Ci is a statistical coefficient

defined as a function of magnitude and/or distance by creating a data set of response spectral shapes.

The spectral shapes for scenario earthquakes using the WUS and CEUS spectral shapes are also shown in Fig. 5.

As shown in this figure, the spectral shapes from the proposed attenuation equations are similar to the shapes from the

CEUS 1 corner frequency model.

Mean ground response spectra obtained from 270 earthquake records with magnitudes 3 to 5 which occurred in

Korea are shown in Fig. 6 [9]. The fluctuation in the spectrum for magnitude 5 earthquakes is due to the very limited

number of data. It is noted from Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 that the spectral shapes from the proposed attenuation equations are

very similar to the mean response spectrum developed from the real earthquake data. The uniform hazard spectrum

for the Korean nuclear power plant site was also very similar to the mean response spectrum developed from the real

earthquake data [13]. This result shows that the ground motion attenuation equations used in the seismic probabilistic

hazard analysis reflected relatively well the ground motion attenuation characteristics and the site soil condition.

These features of near-fault ground motion are generally not considered in the seismic design of nuclear power

plant structures and components. Many researches have been performed to identify the characteristics of near-fault

ground motion [14,15,16]. Ohno et al. [17] showed the range that the near-fault rupture directivity effect is dominant

and proposed a method to correct the predefined response spectrum considering this effect. Fig. 7 shows the FN (Fault

Normal) to FP (Fault Parallel) response spectral ratio from 37 records of the 11 strong earthquakes. These strong

motion records were strongly affected by the near-fault directivity effect. Based on this study, Nishimura et al. [18]

propose a correction factor to modify the response spectrum. The correction factor, (Ti ) , can be obtained from the

following equations.

(Ti ) = 1

for Ti TD

(3)

(4)

where, Ti denotes the period. TD (= 0.33sec) and TH (= 5sec) are the control points of the design ground response

spectrum. These equations express that only the spectral acceleration in long period range greater than 0.33 sec is

increased due to the near-fault rupture directivity effect. And, it is assumed that the spectral acceleration amplification

due to the near-fault rupture directivity effect does not appeare in short period range shorter than 0.33 sec.

Fig. 8 shows the correction factor to incorporate the near-fault directivity effect on the response spectrum shape.

As shown in this figure, the correction factors from the equation can express the near-fault rupture directivity effect

which appeared in the strong earthquake records.

Using the proposed equation, the spectral shapes for the scenario earthquakes were modified to incorporate the

near-fault rupture directivity effect. Fig. 9 shows the modified response spectral shape for the two scenario

earthquakes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the probability based scenario earthquakes for the Korean NPP site were developed using the PSHA

results. The magnitude and distance bins of the scenario earthquakes for the example Korean nuclear power plant site

were M6.4, 9km and M6.2, 13km. The magnitude and distance of the two scenario earthquakes for 1Hz and the

average of the 5Hz and 10Hz are very similar, since the contribution of distant earthquakes to the total hazard is very

small.

The spectral shapes for the scenario earthquakes were developed using the ground motion attenuation equations

proposed by an expert in PSHA and empirical spectral shapes for WUS and CEUS sites. The spectral shapes from the

attenuation equations were very similar to the spectral shape from the CEUS 1 corner frequency model. And the

characteristics of the spectral shape from attenuation equation were similar to that of the mean response spectrum of

the real earthquake records. This means that the ground motion attenuation equations used in the seismic probabilistic

hazard analysis reflected relatively well the ground motion attenuation characteristics.

Recent strong earthquakes that occurred in near-fault regions showed unique characteristics that distinguish them

from the far-field earthquakes. The rupture directivity effect is a dominant factor that impacts on spectral shape. In

this study, using the correction factors, the response spectra for the scenario earthquakes considering the near-fault

rupture directivity effect were developed. The correction factor causes the enrichment of the spectral acceleration in

low frequency region.

A survey on some of the Quaternary fault segments near Korean nuclear power plants is ongoing. If the faults are

confirmed as active ones, it will be necessary to reevaluate the seismic safety of nuclear power plants located near the

fault. The scenario earthquakes and their response spectra can be used for reevaluation of seismic safety of the nuclear

power plants near the active faults.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This research was supported by the Mid- and Long-Term Nuclear Research & Development Program of the

Ministry of Science and Technology, Korea.

REFERENCES

[1] Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Development of Seismic Safety Evaluation Technology for NPP Sites,

KINS/GR-206, 2000.

[2] US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.165, Identification and Characterization of Seismic Sources and Determination of

Safe Shutdown Earthquake Ground Motion, 1997.

[3] Yutaka ISHIKAWA and Hiroyuki KAMEDA, Scenario Earthquakes vs. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard,

Proceedings of ICOSSAR 93, Paper No. 410/4/27, 1993.

[4] McGuire, R. K., Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and Design Earthquakes : Closing the Loop, Bulletin of

Seismological Society of America, Vol. 85, No. 5, 1995.

[5] J. Hirose, K. Muramatsu, T. Okumura, and S. Taki, A Procedure for the Determination of Scenario Earthquakes

for Seismic Design Based on Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis, JAERI-Research 2002-009, 2002.

[6] K. Muramatsu and J. Hirose, "The Use of Seismic Hazard Analysis for Determining Scenario Design Earthquakes

- An Overview of a Recently Completed Work at JAERI -," Procedings of the Seventh Korea-Japan Joint

Workshop on Probabilistic Safety Assessment, 2002.

[7] Ishikawa, Y. and H. Kameda, Scenario Earthquakes vs. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard, Proc. of Fourth

International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, 1993.

[8] T. Takada, T. Okumura, J. Hirose, K. Muramatsu, S. Taki and K. Ishii, Probabilistic Scenario Earthquakes for

Seismic Design Comparison of Two Identification Procedures, Proceedings of the OECD/NEA Workshop on

Seismic Risk, NEA/CSNI/R(99)28, 1999.

[9] Jeong-Moon Seo, Gyung-Shik Min, Young-Sun Choun, and In-Kil Choi, Reduction of Uncertainties in

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis, KAERI/CR-65/99, 1999.

[10] NEA, Lessons Learned from High Magnitude Earthquake with Respect to Nuclear Codes and Standards,

NEA/CSNI/R(2002)22, 2003.

[11] R. K. McGuire, W. J. Silva and C. J. Costantino, Technical Basis for Revision of Regulatory Guidance on Design

Ground Motions : Hazard- and Risk-consistent Ground Motion Spectra Guidelines, NUREG/CR-6728, 2001.

[12] R. K. McGuire, W. J. Silva, and C. J. Costantino, Technical Basis for Revision of Regulatory Guidance on

Design Ground Motions : Development of Hazard- and Risk-consistent Seismic Spectra for Two Sites,

NUREG/CR-6769.

[13] In-Kil Choi, Young-Sun Choun, Jeong-Moon Seo, and Kwan-Hee Yun, Reevaluation of Seismic Fragility

Parameters of Nuclear Power Plant Components Considering Uniform Hazard Spectrum, Journal of the Korean

Nuclear Society, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2002.

[14] Paul Somerville, Characterization of Near-Fault Ground Motions, Proc. of the US-Japan Workshop on the

Effects of Near-Field Earthquake Shaking, 2000.

[15] Shizuo Noda, Kazuhiko Yashiro, Katsuya Takahashi, Masayuki Takemura, Susumi Ohno, Masanobu Tohdo, and

Takahide Watanabe, Response Spectra for Design Purpose of Stiff Structures on Rock Sites, OECD/NEA

workshop on the Relations Between Seismological Data and Seismic Engineering, Istanbul, 16-18 October

2002.

[16] Wilfred D. Iwan, Near-Field Considerations in Specification of Seismic Design Motion, Proc. of 10th European

Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1995.

[17] S. Ohno, M. Takemura, and Y. Kobayashi, Effects of Rupture Directivity on Near-Source Strong Motion,

Proc. 2nd International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, 1998.

[18] Isao Nishimura, Shizuo Noda, Katsuya Takahashi, Masayuki Takemura, Susumu Ohno, Masanobu Tohdo, and

Takahide Watanabe, Response Spectra for Design Purpose of Stiff Structures on Rock Sites, Transactions of

SMiRT 16, Paper No. 1133, 2001.

Table 1. Description of Ground Motion Attenuation Models [9]

Ground

Motion

Measure

PGA

SA

(Spectral

Acceleration)

Model

#

Description

Var.

Minimum

Distance

South Korea

0.6

Weighting

References

0 km

0.5

Baag, 1998

North America

0 km

0.3

North China

0 km

0.2

North America

0 km

0.5

South Korea

0 km

0.3

Eastern North

America

0 km

0.2

Sum

=1

Toro, Abrahamson

and Schneider, 1997

Zhixin, Xiaobai

and Jingru

Sum

=1

Toro, Abrahamson

and Schneider, 1997

Baag, 1998

Atkinson and

Boore, 1995

1Hz

5-10Hz

M6.4, 9.0Km

M6.2, 13.0km

1. 00E- 02

1. 00E- 03

P(A>a)/Year

1. 00E- 04

PGA

25Hz

10Hz

5Hz

1Hz

0. 5Hz

1. 00E- 05

1. 00E- 06

1. 00E- 07

1. 00E- 08

1. 00E- 09

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Acceleration(gal)

0.350

0.250

5-5.5

5.5-6

6-6.5

6.5-7

7-7.5

0.300

0.250

0.200

0.150

0.200

0.150

0.100

0.100

0.050

>2

0

0

20

0-

15

10

0-

15

-5

-1

0

50

25

10

-2

5

1

0.1

0.1

Spectral Acceleration(g)

0.01

Attenuation eq.

EUS_1CORNER

EUS_2CORNER

WUS

0.001

7-7.5

6.5-7

6-6.5

5.5-6

5-5.5

0.000

0-

010

10

-2

5

25

-5

50 0

-1

10 00

01

15 50

020

0

>2

00

0.000

7-7.5

6.5-7

6-6.5

5.5-6

5-5.5

10

0.050

Spectral Acceleration(g)

5-5.5

5.5-6

6-6.5

6.5-7

7-7.5

0.01

Attenuation eq.

EUS_1CORNER

EUS_2CORNER

WUS

0.001

0.0001

0.0001

0.1

10

100

0.1

Frequency(Hz)

10

Frequency(Hz)

(b) 5-10Hz Scenario Earthquake

Fig. 5. Ground Response spectra for Scenario Earthquake

100

Spectral Acceleration(gal)

1E+1

1E+0

1E-1

1E-2

Magnitude

3

1E-3

4

5

1E-4

0.1

1.0

Frequency(Hz)

10.0

- CLAIT Certificate, Tutor marking templatesUploaded bympvuk
- Seismic Aspects of Underground Structures of Hydropower PlantsUploaded byyandipu
- Fault and Seismic Hazard Investigation_VVIUploaded bybinod2500
- A_Time_Dependent_Probabilistic_Seismic_H (3).pdfUploaded byRaviKanthSrivastav
- 20091006-SS-Pp46-50-Applying Integrated Ecological Planning and ALITUploaded bygunteitb
- Deterministic Response Spectrum V2!02!21-12Uploaded byKamal Gm
- (Paper) Design of Tunnel Under Seismic ConditionUploaded byRAJENDRA PRASAD
- V 2154 101 a 217 B_Mechanical Calculation (T 1301)Uploaded byEngineering Mechanics
- lecture16-PSHA-part1Uploaded byArun Goyal
- BSSA_Design_Earthquakes.pdfUploaded byJesus Chavez Solano
- EarthquakeUploaded byAvinash Pathania
- Nepal EarthquakeUploaded byDeb Banerjee
- JOU_EQ Analysis of structure by Base Isolation technique in SAP.pdfUploaded byIlham Hussein Rasyid
- Indian Tsunami Warning system latestUploaded byBabu Seeworld
- 1963 SkopjeUploaded bytransgresivac
- Bankers Adda_ Quiz_ Reading Comprehension May 5Uploaded byDhritimanChakraborty
- lec15.pdfUploaded byCarlos Arturo García
- omn-seismic.pdfUploaded byLe Doctrine
- Earthquake Plate 4Uploaded byRonaldo Manuel Francisco Baluyot
- Gomez 2014Uploaded byFrancisco Javier Acuña Olate
- Ijsrp Sept 2013 PrintUploaded byZeeshaan Bhatt
- nullUploaded byapi-27481415
- 2011 Jb 008213Uploaded bylulu bird
- agd_earthsystemUploaded bylutabuli
- Toppled Vehicles During Kumamoto EarthquUploaded byAnonymous rQKN6vV
- Disaster ManagementUploaded byதினேஷ் குமார்
- 2013internationaljournalgeosciencesapril2013finalUploaded byapi-260591323
- Gujarat ReportUploaded byAviral Joshi
- Polytene Chromosomes LabUploaded bysamy
- EQTip06.pdfUploaded byRAIZZ

- Modeling Overhead Gantry CraneUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Mechanized Tunneling in Soft Soils Choice of Excavation Mode AndApplication of Soil-ConditioningUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- ASCE_JUNE2012_679-687Uploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- CONSTRUCTION_OF_TUNNELS_BY_NEW_AUSTRIAN.pdfUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- MC2_AGANUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- State of the ArtDesignGuidelinesforUnlinedPressureTunnels PanthiandBasnet ARMS10Uploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Adapting The Modified Cam Clay Constitutive Model To The Computat.pdfUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Material_Modelling.pdfUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- ICOVP Hussein 2013Uploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- mUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Instruction to Link Abaqus With vs and IFCUploaded bykhayat
- Burland-RankineLectureUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Consolidation 1Uploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Sesam-Bladed-flier_tcm8-77530.pdfUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Sesam [IMT Software Wiki]Uploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Linear Structural Analysis - Sestra - DNV GLUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Hydrostatic and Hydrodynamic Analysis - Wajac - DNV GLUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Fatigue Analysis of Frame Models - Framework - DNV GLUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- PUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- fatigue.pdfUploaded byiaft
- 24P1-6Uploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Niiranen Etal MMS 2017 REVISEDUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Probab i List c Failure AnalysisUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- Chapter_9 - Fatigue From Variable Amplitude LoadingUploaded byOdjak Maryono
- solthe95Uploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- SMiRT-23_Paper_326Uploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- 14787126Uploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- 1991useofstraightbeam28asce290733-9445281991291173A728196329Uploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed
- 3340-Lectures-7-to-12-S1-2015Uploaded byUtsav Koshti
- 42 Spec.fat.AndStressBasedRel.assessmentofOffshoreSteelStrucUploaded byMohinuddin Ahmed

- jessica tunny evaluationUploaded byapi-322512904
- Victorian LiteratureUploaded byHanaVrbanić
- VarUploaded byLoveofyouth Reddy
- VP Facilities Operations Real Estate in Atlanta GA Resume Sandra WatsonUploaded bySandraWatson2
- RigelUploaded byIntergalactic Shamanic Mystic Angel
- Fiber Optics LectureUploaded byShinoj
- 9A23602 Biochemical Reaction Engineering-IIUploaded bysivabharathamurthy
- pgiUploaded byratnav_ratan
- BeamUploaded byكرم عمرو
- Seven-Segment and Sixteen-Segment Controls for WPF - CodeProjectUploaded bygfgomes
- Desiring God's Will By David G. Benner - EXCERPTUploaded byInterVarsity Press Samples
- 1. Antimikroba-1Uploaded byRichard Morales
- SocializationUploaded byMalloni Gniwap
- The Kingdom of ChildhoodUploaded byckom26
- Bizhub Press c7000 Series BrochureUploaded byjennabush
- History of VSLUploaded byDrPadipat Chaemmangkang
- LCM & HCFUploaded byArockia Raj
- 01 Intact CaseinUploaded byPat Ferrer
- ob rohitUploaded bynikita sharma
- Mat Rempit EditedUploaded byadle_2
- Branding From the Inside OutUploaded bytausif_7827
- UW Biomass Full ReportUploaded byjperraton
- philips_pet1030_1035Uploaded byHito de Merlo
- MEGABRAS _ MTD-20KWe _ Earth Resistance and Resistivity Meter_ CharaUploaded byMarlon Aliaga
- In a Quality Control TestUploaded byHarry Frianota ID
- Secularization Versus the Weight of Catholic Tradition among Spanish WomenUploaded byInstitute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture
- 1006 iGCSE Grade BoundariesUploaded byRivant De Moff
- CES Manual and Getting StartedUploaded byMohamed Samy
- A Brief Guide to RomanticismUploaded byAmira Azmal
- Quotte Bluegreen Boutique Office Pcm ProjectUploaded byMarhadi Leonchi