You are on page 1of 1

2566 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2006 / Notices

infringement of one or more of claims 3, Commission, without further notice to DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
4, 6, 8–12, and 36 of U.S. Patent No. the respondents, to find the facts to be
5,021,945, claims 18–20, 23, and 25–27 as alleged in the complaint and this Employment and Training
of U.S. Patent No. 5,517,628, and claims notice and to enter a final determination Administration
3–11, 13, 14, 19, and 21–25 of U.S. containing such findings, and may
Patent No. 6,253,313, and whether an result in the issuance of a limited [TA–W–58,037]
industry in the United States exists as exclusion order or cease and desist
required by subsection (a)(2) of section Cabot Corporation, Supermetals
order or both directed against the
337. Division, Boyertown, PA; Dismissal of
respondent.
(2) For the purpose of the Application for Reconsideration
investigation so instituted, the following By order of the Commission.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
are hereby named as parties upon which Issued: January 9, 2006.
application for administrative
this notice of investigation shall be Marilyn R. Abbott, reconsideration was filed with the
served: Secretary to the Commission. Director of the Division of Trade
(a) The complainant is—
BIAX Corporation, 1942 Broadway, [FR Doc. E6–370 Filed 1–13–06; 8:45 am] Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Suite 404, Boulder, Colorado 80302. BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Cabot Corporation, Supermetals
(b) The respondents are the following Division, Boyertown, Pennsylvania. The
entities alleged to be in violation of application did not contain new
section 337, and are the parties upon INTERNATIONAL TRADE information supporting a conclusion
which the complaint is to be served: COMMISSION that the determination was erroneous,
Philips Semiconductors B.V., Bldg. and also did not provide a justification
BE P, PO Box 218, 5600 Eindhoven, [USITC SE–06–006] for reconsideration of the determination
Netherlands. that was based on either mistaken facts
Philips Consumer Electronics Government in the Sunshine Act or a misinterpretation of facts or of the
Services B.V., Boschdjik 525, Postbus Meeting Notice law. Therefore, dismissal of the
90050, 5600 PB Eindhoven, application was issued.
Netherlands. AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United TA–W–58,037; Cabot Corporation
Philips Consumer Electronics North States International Trade Commission. Supermetals Division Boyertown,
America Corp., 64 Perimeter Center Pennsylvania (January 5, 2006)
East, Atlanta, GA 30346. TIME AND DATE: January 18, 2006 at 11
Signed at Washington, DC this 6th day of
2Wire, Inc., 1704 Automation a.m. January 2006.
Parkway, San Jose, CA 95131. PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Erica R. Cantor,
(c) Benjamin D.M. Wood, Esq., Office
Washington, DC 20436. Telephone: Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. Assistance.
International Trade Commission, 500 E (202) 205–2000.
[FR Doc. E6–384 Filed 1–13–06; 8:45 am]
Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC STATUS: Open to the public.
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
20436, who shall be the Commission
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
investigative attorney, party to this
investigation; and 1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
(3) For the investigation so instituted, 2. Minutes.
the Honorable Sidney Harris is Employment and Training
designated as the presiding 3. Ratification List.
Administration
administrative law judge. 4. Inv. Nos. 731–TA–457–A–D
Responses to the amended complaint (Second Review) (Heavy Forged Hand [TA–W–57,867]
and the notice of investigation must be Tools from China)—briefing and vote.
submitted by the named respondents in (The Commission is currently scheduled Capital City Press, Inc., Publication
accordance with section 210.13 of the to transmit its determination and Services Division, Barre, VT; Dismissal
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Commissioners’ opinions to the of Application for Reconsideration
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to Secretary of Commerce on or before
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
January 31, 2006.)
responses will be considered by the application for administrative
Commission if received not later than 20 5. Outstanding action jackets: None. reconsideration was filed with the
days after the date of service by the In accordance with Commission Director of the Division of Trade
Commission of the amended complaint policy, subject matter listed above, not Adjustment Assistance for workers at
and the notice of investigation. disposed of at the scheduled meeting, Capital City Press, Inc., Publication
Extensions of time for submitting may be carried over to the agenda of the Services Division, Barre, Vermont. The
responses to the amended complaint following meeting. application did not contain new
and the notice of investigation will not information supporting a conclusion
Issued: January 11, 2006. that the determination was erroneous,
be granted unless good cause therefor is
shown. By order of the Commission. and also did not provide a justification
Failure of a respondent to file a timely Marilyn R. Abbott, for reconsideration of the determination
response to each allegation in the Secretary to the Commission. that was based on either mistaken facts
amended complaint and in this notice or a misinterpretation of facts or of the
sroberts on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES

[FR Doc. 06–445 Filed 1–12–06; 1:36 pm]


may be deemed to constitute a waiver of law. Therefore, dismissal of the
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
the right to appear and contest the application was issued.
allegations of the complaint and this TA–W–57,867; Capital City Press,
notice, and to authorize the Publication Services Division, Barre,
administrative law judge and the Vermont (January 10, 2006)

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:57 Jan 13, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM 17JAN1