EXHIBIT 11IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT 5 a¢ appeAt- Secon O18 DIVISION FIVE iF i i Eg D pee - 2 osepn pias BELCHER ea MELISSA BALIN, B245301 Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. 1CA16847-02) v. (Renee Kom, Judge) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent, ORDER CARMEN TRUTANICH, Real Party in interest, THE COURT: ‘The court has read and considered the petition for writ of prohibition, quo warranto, mandate or other appropriate relief filed November 26, 2012, and the ‘Supreme Court's order filed November 27, 2012 transferring the matter to this court, ‘The petition is denied for failure to provide a record sufficient for adequate appellate review. (Seo Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.486(b); Sherwood v. Superior Court (1979) 24 Cal.3d 183, 186-187; Cal. Civil Writ Practice (Cont.Bd:Bar 2011) § 20.6 et seq., pp. 566-567.) Gaui, - exhibit] -Page.20L‘To the extent there is any viable claim, jurisdiction over the matter would be vested in the appellate division of the superior court. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 10; Pen. Code, § 1466.) MOSK, Acting PJ. Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court