You are on page 1of 2

Leader’sEdge

Communicate better. Get results.


Tips for becoming a “results-based communicator” and cutting through the mental clutter

By Brian Kush, CPA, CISA, CITP

“I wish I could have said that another Take ownership


way.” Communication breakdowns often
“I wish I could take back what I occur in the fourth part of the process —
said. That wasn’t what I meant!” the recipient did not interpret the message
“I did not catch a word you just the way it was intended. (“You never told
said!” me THAT!”)
If you’ve ever been on the giving or A common response is to blame the
If you want others to receiving end of one of these responses, recipient, but if you want to be a results-
you’ve just uncovered the biggest prob- based communicator, and if you care
correctly interpret lem with communication. It involves two more about the execution of effective
(or more) people! communication than the blame of inef-
your message, you There is also a four-step process that’s fective communication, you must take
essential to communication. Any effec- ownership for ALL FOUR PARTS of the
must think and tively delivered and understood message process.
must be: That’s right! You must ensure the
communicate like a 1. Constructed in the brain of the other person interprets your message cor-
non-accountant! initiator.
2. Formulated and delivered in a
rectly. This is not easy because, well, you
have no control over their brain.
fashion so that the original infor- This may be very difficult. It may take
mation makes it from thought to patience. It may take a lot of resolve.
physical message. What it really takes is a leader. Leaders
3. Heard by the recipient. communicate messages that get results!
4. Interpreted so that the intended Leaders realize that without step Nos. 3
message can be processed, and if and 4 in the communication process, the
necessary, acted upon. first two steps mean nothing.

During this four-step process Be wary of accounting lingo


there are lots of things that can go Accountants have an additional
wrong. The communicator might challenge. We are part of a “technical”
not say what was intended. profession. We are tasked with interpret-
(“Gee, that didn’t sound the ing and communicating the language of
way I wanted.”) The recipi- business. We deal with a lot of numbers,
ent might tune out. (“Sorry, but we also deal with theories, principles,
I wasn’t listening — I was methods and “gray areas.” We use a lot
checking my e-mail.”) of acronyms, abbreviations and technical
Here are some easy ways jargon. We communicate with other ac-
to communicate better — countants, but we also communicate with
and get the results you want! non-accountants — lawyers, executives
and other professionals who may not be
versed in our lingo.
Many times, if you want others to
“Leader’s Edge” is a six-part Disclosures column by Brian Kush, CPA, correctly interpret your message, you
CISA, CITP, focusing on management, leadership and interpersonal must think and communicate like a non-
skills essential for CPAs. Brian is a featured VSCPA speaker who travels accountant!
the state offering in-house CPE courses. Want to learn more or book
Brian for your firm or company? Contact VSCPA Customized Education Set your intentions
Manager Lydia Sartori at lsartori@vscpa.com or (804) 612-9425. You must become more intentional
about planning your important messages.

8 Leader ’s Edge • Disclosures • March/April


What is the best medium to use? E-mail,
text message, voicemail, a live phone call
SELVES a question ahead of time:
How will this person best receive my Remember this!
or a face-to-face meeting? message?
Some messages may lend themselves If there is one more thing you
better to certain media. If you are firing •• They use tools such as metaphors and take away from this article, it’s
someone, e-mail may not be the best way analogies (if needed). Does the recipi- this: Effective communicators
to do it. If you are relaying to someone ent like sports? If so, maybe a sports thrive on soliciting feedback.
a long list of instructions they’ll need to analogy will be useful in a certain They use feedback to strengthen
complete a task, a voicemail is probably an conversation. Was the recipient on an-
how they deliver important
inefficient way to do that. other project where something similar
But the most important consideration occurred? If so, maybe referring back messages so the results they
when deciding what medium to use in to that situation will help that light bulb want occur more often!
crafting and delivering your message is go off in understanding the current
simple: Consider the recipient! What situation and message. You aren’t telling them how they
is the best medium to use so the RE- SHOULD listen to you. You are showing
CIPIENT has the best chance to hear and them that you want to hear how you can
interpret your message? It’s all about the
receiver!
Remember this! best COMMUNICATE with them based
on their input. How motivating would it
There was an old “Seinfeld” episode be if all of the colleagues we work with
If there is one thing you take
in which Jerry lamented about how any the most took this approach? How much
rental car company can “take a reserva- away from this article, it’s this: more efficient would our communications
tion.” But it’s the holding of the reserva- If you want to be a better be if we invested in our relationships this
tion that really matters. communicator, focus your way?
Well, anyone can just send a message. attention on the other person Soliciting feedback can hold an ad-
It is easy to just start talking, texting or and how they, as the unique ditional benefit. It tells the other person
e-mailing. It is the delivery and correct individual(s) they are, will you care enough about your relationship
interpretation of your message that leads RECEIVE your message best. to make a personal investment in it. The
to results. Make it about them. Not you! questions above are mostly open ended,
Too many accountants get caught up If you are not sure how, shock which means you are asking for their input
in their message, their interpretation of them! Awe them! Surprise and their answers.
an issue or their desire to demonstrate them! How do you do that?
These types of questions don’t assume.
mastery of an accounting issue — and They don’t pre-judge. They don’t dictate
Make a small investment in your
therefore we talk too much like “techies.” “how it should be.”
We throw out the latest accounting jargon relationship. Take the time to They do invite. They do seek to un-
and make the assumption that those listen- ask them a few questions about cover. They do demonstrate a desire for
ing understand it just as we do. effective communication. teamwork.
This problem is easy to fix. We need to They communicate an important mes-
talk like the specific audience “hears.” It is sage: The way we interact is important.
not about “dumbing” down your message. Results-based communicators in- They may communicate an additional,
It is quite the opposite. It is about making tentionally “design” their important powerful message: YOU ARE IMPOR-
it more effective! Many times, that means relationships by getting feedback on TANT. Better results will follow! 
simplifying your message. And all the time their communication effectiveness:
it means holding an active conversation in
which you confirm their understanding! •• Tell me about our communication
You have probably worked with some levels. How are we doing? Brian Kush, CPA,
effective communicators. Do they thrive CISA, CITP,
in using technical jargon? No, they thrive •• Have I been too direct and short in is a leadership coach
in simplifying their message just enough my instructions? Too elaborate and and president at
so that you and others understand it. They detailed? How? Moxie Partners, and
thrive based on simplicity and clarity. author of “Auditing
•• Are there certain media you prefer? If Leadership”
Results-based communicators take the matter is urgent, what should we (Wiley, July 2009). Contact him
extra time to ensure recipients un- do? at brian@moxiepartners.com or
derstand their messages: (571) 313-1735.
•• Do you have any ideas on how we can
•• They ask questions to ensure under- ensure we are communicating effec-
standing such as: Did that make sense? tively so we both clearly understand
Did I say that clearly? They ask THEM- our responsibilities?

Leader ’s Edge • Disclosures • March/April 9

You might also like