Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A novel design approach for small scale low enthalpy binary geothermal
power plants
Roberto Gabbrielli
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dellEnergia e dei Sistemi, Facolt di Ingegneria, Universit di Pisa, Largo L. Lazzarino, 56126 Pisa, Italy
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 1 February 2012
Received in revised form 25 April 2012
Accepted 27 April 2012
Available online 26 September 2012
Keywords:
Off-design modelling
Binary geothermal power plants
Organic Rankine Cycle
Design optimization
a b s t r a c t
In this paper a novel design approach for small scale low enthalpy binary geothermal power plants is proposed. After the suction, the hot water (brine) superheats an organic uid (R134a) in a Rankine cycle and,
then, is injected back underground. This fact causes the well-known thermal degradation of the geothermal resource during the years. Hence, the binary geothermal power plants have to operate with conditions that largely vary during their life and, consequently, the most part of their functioning is
executed in off-design conditions.
So, as the novel approach here proposed, the design temperature of the geothermal resource is selected
between its highest and lowest values, that correspond to the beginning and the end of the operative life
of the geothermal power plant, respectively. Hence, using a detailed off-design performance model, the
optimal design point of the geothermal power plant is evaluated maximizing the total actualized cash
ow from the incentives for renewable power generation. Under different renewable energy incentive
scenarios, the power plant that is designed using the lowest temperature of the geothermal resource
always results the best option.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The exploitation of geothermal energy that is considered a
renewable power source is limited in very narrow zones, where
it is possible to nd geothermal sources with high temperature
at low depth that can be used economically. During last years, in
order to enlarge the use of renewable power sources, some geothermal wells characterized by low temperature liquid-dominated
sources that in the past were not considered suitable for power
generation, have been planned to be valorised from the energy
point of view. For this kind of geothermal sources, where watersteam cycle cannot be practically adopted, the application of closed
binary Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) is considered technically and
economically feasible. The hot brine is sucked from the well, it is
cooled during the heating of a suitable organic uid and, nally,
it is injected back underground.
As well known, the injection of the cold brine causes the temperature reduction of the geothermal resource through the years.
This phenomenon can become particularly critical during long
operative life of low enthalpy binary ORCs. Indeed, in this kind of
power plants also temperature decreases of few degrees can imply
both severe operative problems to the most important equipment
and a strong degradation of their thermodynamic performances,
because they have to operate largely in off-design conditions.
Tel.: +39 050 2217138; fax: +39 050 2217150.
E-mail address: r.gabbrielli@ing.unipi.it
0196-8904/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.04.017
264
Nomenclature
B
EOS
ORC
_
m
P
T
Yd
Greek symbols
g
efciency
q
mass density (kg/m3)
p
/
mass ow coefcient, temperature form (m s K)
Subscripts
air
ambient air
b
brine
d
design point
geo
geothermal uid
in
inlet
n
net
off
off-design
R134a
relative to the uid R134a
All these kinds of design approach do not take into account the
effects of the resource degradation on the plant performance and,
consequently, the optimal designed geothermal power plant could
not actually result the best solution using a larger perspective over
their whole life.
In literature, the problem of the performance assessment for
ORC power plants in geothermal and waste-heat recovery applications under part load and off-design conditions has been investigated by some authors. All of them analyses the behavior of this
kind of power plants when the thermodynamic features of the heat
source and cooling sink are different from their starting values
used in the design phase. Hence, they do not discuss the problem
of the optimal design of ORC geothermal power plants when the
most part of their operative conditions is different from the design
point. In particular, in [15] once xed the design conditions, results
of performance studies for a binary pilot dual pressure cycle process with isobutane as working uid were presented. The simulations, based on a mathematical model, whose detailed
formulation is not reported by the author, were performed under
varying geouid inlet temperature and ow rate, varying ambient
conditions, varying heat exchanger fouling and varying turbine
conguration. The most meaningful result was that the decreases
in geouid temperature can be compensated for by the increase
in geouid ow. In [16], an accurate and well-described procedure
was reported to predict the ORC power plant performance under
off-design conditions when the hot brine and the cooling water
temperatures vary through the year. When the design values of
heat source and cooling water are 85 C and 25 C, respectively,
the power plant was able to maintain acceptable performances
also with temperature modications in heat source and cooling
water of about 15 C and 5 C. In [17], the impact of off-design
operation on air-cooled binary geothermal power plant, when
changes in the ambient air temperature, as well as the decline in
resource productivity over time, occur, has been examined using
Aspen Plus simulation software. The simulation results indicated
that as plant operation deviates from the design resource and
ambient scenario, its ability to convert the available energy in
the inlet brine degrades. In [18] an Aspen Plus based simulation
model of part load and off-design operation of an ORC unit for
combined heat and power in the furniture manufacturing industry
has been developed. The performances have been evaluated varying the condensation pressure and the input thermal power. Walnum et al. [19] focused on the off-design operation of ORCs for
power generation from low temperature sources and compared
the behavior of transcritical CO2 cycles and an ORC cycle with
R123 as working uid when the temperature and mass ow rate
of the heat source vary. The main result was that the ORC is very
sensitive to reduction in available heat. This required to operate
the ORC with some degrees superheat. Finally in [20] the off-design
265
266
At the design point, the main input data of the ORC used in the
simulation analyses are:
Gross power of the expander: 500 kW. This value is limited by
the characteristics of the geothermal heat source.
The inlet expander pressure is 50 bar [22,23].
The isoentropic efciency of the expander is 85% [20,22,23].
The isoentropic efciency of the pump is 80%.
The generator efciency is 98%.
The approach point in the shell and tube heat exchanger
between the brine inlet and the R134a outlet is 10 C.
The condenser pressure and temperature are 8 bar and 31 C,
respectively.
The ambient air temperature (Tair) is equal to 15 C.
4.1. Expander
The ORC expander has been supposed to operate as sliding pressure mode with xed nozzle area [20]. Therefore, the inlet pressure
depends on the ow characteristics of the machine and can be calculated using the Stodolas ellipse approach [2628]:
_ R134ainoff
/off m
From Eq. (2) it is possible to obtain the equation which has been
implemented into the simulation model:
PR134ainoff
where:
q
1 BR134aoff =PR134ainoff 2
/off
q
/d
1 BR134ad =PR134aind 2
3. Site characteristics
p
T R134ainoff =PR134ainoff
Yd
q
_ 2R134ainoff T R134ainoff Y d B2R134aoff
m
P2R134aind B2R134ad
P2R134aind /2d
The Stodolas constants for the calculation of Yd have been evaluated using the values relative to the design conditions of the
expander.
The isentropic expansion efciency has been evaluated using
the simple formula reported below [29]:
"
goff
#
_ R134ainoff qR134aind 0:1
m
gd sin 0:5p
_ R134aind qR134ainoff
m
Table 1
Frequency of the ambient air temperature and plant availability during a generic year for three different sites.
Temperature
(C)
Cold climate
Warm climate
Hot climate
Number of calendar
hours
%
Hours
Hours of
availability
Number of calendar
hours
%
Hours
Hours of
availability
Number of calendar
hours
%
Hours
Hours of
availability
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
350.4
1051.2
1927.2
1839.6
1489.2
1314
613.2
175.2
0
4
12
22
21
17
15
7
2
0
280.32
840.96
1541.76
1471.68
1191.36
1051.2
490.56
140.16
0
13
294
1271
2063
2067
1679
1064
306
3
0.15
3.36
14.51
23.55
23.60
19.17
12.15
3.49
0.03
10.4
235.2
1016.8
1650.4
1653.6
1343.2
851.2
244.8
2.4
0
87.6
876
1401.6
1752
2190
1752
438
262.8
0
1
10
16
20
25
20
5
3
0
70.08
700.8
1121.28
1401.6
1752
1401.6
350.4
210.24
267
_ bd
_ boff m
m
T bind 70 273
T binoff 70 273
where Tb-in-d and Tb-in-off are the values of the brine temperature relative to the design point and to a generic year through the plant life,
respectively.
5. Design conditions
Four design conditions for the ORC geothermal power plant
have been compared (Fig. 3) in the successive optimization
procedure. In particular, Tb-in-d assumes the following values:
160 C, 150 C, 140 C and 130 C. The rst value regards the case
when the design condition corresponds to the starting life of the
plant, the second design temperature is that after 10 years of
running, the third design temperature is that after 20 years, and,
nally, the latter design condition corresponds to the end of the
plant operative life that has been xed equal to 30 years. For this
case, it is necessary to observe that the design pressure has been
selected equal to 45 bar in order to avoid the wet outlet of the
expander (Fig. 3).
The main results for the four design solutions are reported in
Table 2. Evidently the design net efciency decreases with Tb-in-d.
It is important to stress that the comparison among the four power
plants is executed using practically a xed thermal input. Hence,
_ bd for the lowest Tb-in-d does not mean that
the higher value of m
it is possible to use this design value also for the plant with the
highest Tb-in-d. This would imply that the thermal power extracted
from the geothermal well is much larger than the design value
required for the production of the gross 500 kW and, consequently,
the thermal annual degradation through the life would be largely
higher than 1 C per year only for this designed power plant.
Fig. 3. Pressure-enthalpy diagram of the four ORC power plants at their design point.
268
Table 2
Performance of the four ORC at their design point.
Tb-in-d (C)
160
150
140
130
14.71
9.65
50
150
390
500
9.1
15.81
10.98
50
140
350
500
8.7
17.35
12.79
50
130
330
500
8.1
19.07
15.81
45
120
315
500
7.2
Fig. 4. Variation of the R134 mass ow rate during the life and the day. (a) Tb-in-d =
160 C, (b) Tb-in-d = 150 C, (c) Tb-in-d = 140 C, (d) Tb-in-d = 130 C.
269
Fig. 5. Variation of the turbine inlet pressure during the life and the day. (a) Tb-in-d =
160 C, (b) Tb-in-d = 150 C, (c) Tb-in-d = 140 C, (d) Tb-in-d = 130 C.
rst 15 years, the income derives from the feed-in tariff for renewable power generation. After the incentive period, the electricity is
sold to the national grid with a lower price. In this context, the
plant cost of each designed alternative has not been taken into account, because it is practically equal and, consequently, does not
inuence the optimal selection. Indeed, from the mechanical point
of view, each equipment has been designed obviously considering
Fig. 6. Variation of the net efciency during the life and the day. (a) Tb-in-d = 160 C,
(b) Tb-in-d = 150 C, (c) Tb-in-d = 140 C, (d) Tb-in-d = 130 C.
the most severe operating condition during the whole life. For
example, the most critical couple of values of pressure and temperature, that are located just at the inlet of the shell and tube heat exchanger, has been taken into account for the denition of the tube
thickness. The pressure, that can assume high values, is practically
270
Fig. 7. Annual plant capacity factor during the plant life for three sites (cold, warm
and hot).
Fig. 8. Annual production of electricity during the plant life for three sites (cold,
warm and hot).
thermal electricity production until the 15th year. After the 15th
year the electricity selling revenue has been considered equal to
101 /MWh [34]. In this way it is possible to evaluate the effect
of the renewable power incentive scenario on the selection of best
geothermal power plant design conguration. Due to the plant
stoppages cited above, the plant capacity factor, whose trend is reported in Fig. 7, is lower than the expected value due to the failures. The geothermal power plant designed with the lowest Tb-ind is characterized by the highest capacity factor, because it is more
suitable to face the decline of the brine temperature. The capacity
factor of the other options becomes lower than 1020% at the end
of the operative life. Hence, their operation does not result practically useful after the 2025th year.
Using the net power produced, it is possible to evaluate the annual production of electricity, as reported in Fig. 8. The capacity
factor and the net efciency decrease through the years and, consequently, the electricity production is characterized by a similar
trend. During the rst years of operation, the plant designed with
Tb-in-d equal to 130 C has a lower productivity due to its lower ef-
Total production of
electricity (GWh)
Incentive:
200 /MWh
Incentive:
250 /MWh
Cold climate
130
69.70
140
58.34
150
53.69
160
54.54
3.61
3.48
3.37
3.40
5.39
5.35
5.26
5.28
6.57
6.53
6.44
6.45
Warm climate
130
64.18
140
49.74
150
45.17
160
47.45
3.35
3.14
3.02
3.11
5.01
4.90
4.80
4.88
6.04
6.00
5.90
5.99
Hot climate
130
140
150
160
3.12
2.79
2.70
2.84
4.68
4.41
4.33
4.48
5.65
5.43
5.34
5.50
58.82
42.33
38.73
42.45
271
ervoir lifetime and the geouid behavior, the investor can actually
select or not the most protable power plant that is sized with the
end-of-life brine temperature in accordance with his risk approach.
Future analyses could concern the possibility to integrate other
renewable power sources, such as biomass and solar thermal
power, in order to improve the thermodynamic performance of
the plants, for example increasing the brine temperature to more
acceptable values. In this way, the capacity factor of the power
plants could largely improve. This integration, in particular with
solar thermal power, could be particularly useful when the
ambient air temperature assumes the highest values (i.e. the highest irradiation periods), causing the most severe operating conditions. Further, the effect of different control rules on the plant
performances could be assessed. For example, it would be interesting to evaluate the operating behavior of the geothermal power
plants when the brine mass ow rate is kept constant through
the life of the plants. In this way the thermal input of ORC is
decreasing and, consequently, the geothermal source degradation
is lower. Finally, it will be interesting to analyze the effect of the
wet air during the rainy days on the off-design behavior of the
condenser. This aspect, that has not been taken into account in this
paper, might be advantageous to raise the cooling effect.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank Irene Fastelli (Enel Engineering
and Innovation, Technical Research Area, Pisa, Italy) for her support
provided during the research, a part of which has been described in
this paper. Moreover the author wants to thank the reviewers for
their useful contributions to improving this paper.
References
[1] DiPippo R. Ideal thermal efciency for geothermal binary plants. Geothermics
2007;36:27685.
[2] Desideri U, Bidini G. Study of possible optimization criteria for geothermal
power plants. Energy Convers Manage 1997;38:168191.
[3] Hettiarachchi HDM, Golubovic M, Worek WM, Ikegami Y. Optimum design
criteria for an organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat
source. Energy 2007;32:1698706.
[4] Wei D, Lu X, Lu Z, Gu J. Performance analysis and optimization of organic
Rankine cycle (ORC) for waste heat recovery. Energy Convers Manage
2007;48:11139.
[5] Gu Z, Sato H. Optimization of cyclic parameters of a supercritical cycle for
geothermal power generation. Energy Convers Manage 2001;42:140916.
[6] Gu Z, Sato H. Performance of supercritical cycles for geothermal binary design.
Energy Convers Manage 2002;43:96171.
[7] Arslan O, Yetik O. ANN based optimization of supercritical ORC-binary
geothermal power plant: simav case study. Appl Therm Eng 2011;31:39228.
[8] Kanoglu M, Bolatturk A. Performance and parametric investigation of a binary
geothermal power plant by exergy. Renew Energy 2008;33:236674.
[9] Dai Y, Wang J, Gao L. Parametric optimization and comparative study of
organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low grade waste heat recovery. Energy
Convers Manage 2009;50:57682.
[10] Roy JP, Mishra MK, Misra A. Parametric optimization and performance analysis
of a waste heat recovery system using organic Rankine cycle. Energy
2010;35:504962.
[11] Roy JP, Mishra MK, Misra A. Performance analysis of an organic Rankine cycle
with superheating under different heat source temperature conditions. Appl
Energy 2011;88:29953004.
[12] Shengjun Z, Huaixin W, Tao G. Performance comparison and parametric
optimization of subcritical organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and transcritical
power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation. Appl
Energy 2011;88:274054.
[13] Quoilin S, Declaye S, Tchanche BF, Lemort V. Thermo-economic optimization of
waste heat recovery organic Rankine cycles. Appl Therm Eng
2011;31:288593.
[14] Sun J, Li W. Operation optimization of an organic rankine cycle (ORC) heat
recovery power plant. Appl Therm Eng 2011;31:203241.
[15] Bliem Jr. Design and off-design operation of a dual-boiling binary geothermal
power plant. AIChE Symp Ser 1980;76:16372.
[16] Gurgenci H. Performance of power plants with organic Rankine cycles under
part-load and off-design conditions. Sol Energy 1986;36:4551.
[17] Mines GL. Evaluation of the impact of off-design operation on an air-cooled
binary power plant. Trans Geotherm Res Coun 2002:7015.
272
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]