You are on page 1of 4

egregious accusations are tossed at board members by shareholders, legally

defamatory or not,

Support Us!
Search all of LII.

About LII

Get the law

Lawyer directory

Legal encyclopedia

Help out


all pages



Inbox Project




or some harm caused to the person or entity who is the subject of the statement. a plaintiff must show four things: 1) a false statement purporting to be fact. pictures. contempt or ridicule. A private person suing about a matter of private concern need only show negligence. In addition. However. a parent's statement to her or his children warning them not to associate with certain kids is likely protected by a qualified privilege. Under the traditional rules of libel. and 4) damages.S. effigies.S. For instance. preponderance of the evidence. statements made by witnesses during a judicial proceedings are subject to absolute privilege. public officials and public figures (people who are famous) must show that statements were made with actual malice to recover in an action for defamation. Defamation claims are also subject to a number of privileges. Supreme Court has held . An absolute privilege is a complete defense to a defamation claim. meaning that the defendant knew the statement was false. a plaintiff must show actual malice by "clear and convincing" evidence rather than the usual burden of proof in a civil case. Statements may also be protected by a qualified privilege. Supreme Court's 1964 decision in New York Times v. Libel Definition Libel is a method of defamation expressed by print. Actual malice means that a statement was made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether or not it was false. defamation claims have been limited by First Amendment concerns. 2) publication or communication of that statement to a third person. signs. Overview Libel is a tort governed by State law. State courts generally follow the common law of libel. or any communication embodied in physical form that is injurious to a person's reputation. The tort of defamation includes both libel (written statements) and slander (spoken statements). The types and limits of these privileges will vary from state to state. Statements made during legislative debates are also protected by an absolute privilege. or injures a person in his/her business or profession. injury is presumed from the fact of publication. writing. Thus. the U. Sullivan. Since the U. The reason is that those statements are subject to sanctions. or would have known if she or he had exercised reasonable care. which allows recovery of damages without proof of actual harm. For instance. 3) fault. exposes a person to public hatred. for instance. To win a defamation case.Defamation is a statement that injures a third party's reputation.

323 (1974). the Court refused to extend the New York Times standard to actions for libel involving private individuals even where the matter is of public concern. v. Greenmoss Builders. the Court held that in actions for libel involving private individuals and matters of purely private concern. that is. the Court held that proof of actual malice is required for an award of damages in an action for libel involving public figures or matters of public concern.. Alliance Resources. In Gertz. e. Inc. TXO Production Corp. The Gertz Court held that in a case involving a matter of public concern. Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary Calumny (cal-um-nee) Maliciously misrepresenting another's words or acts.. 443 (1993).that freedom of expression secured by the First Amendment limits a State's power to award damages in actions for libel. See Dun & Bradstreet. recovery of presumed or punitive damages is not permitted without a showing of malice. See. See New York Times Co. Greenmoss Builders. Inc.S.. the Court determined that the First Amendment was not violated by permitting recovery of presumed and punitive damages absent a showing of malice when the defamatory statements do not involve issues of public concern. and outweighs the State's interest in compensating individuals for damage to their reputations. unless liability is based on a showing of knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.S.g. which defames another person. In Gertz v. 472 U. Robert Welch. Unlike libel. causing injury to that person's reputation. The Court reasoned that speech related to matters of public concern is at the heart of the protections guaranteed by the First Amendment. 418 U. Sullivan. LIFE EVENTS accidents & injuries (tort law) . or falsely charging another with a crime. but cautioned that this interest extends no further than comensation for actual injury. usually made orally. v. In Dun & Bradstreet. presumed and punitive damages may be awarded on a lesser showing than actual malice. v. Inc. v.S. In New York Times Co..S. Robert Welch. the Court recognized a strong and legitimate state interest in compensating private individuals for injury to reputation. 254 (1964). In Dun & Bradstreet. Inc. Slander A false statement. v. Inc. 749 (1985). Inc. damages from slander are not presumed and must be proven by the party suing. 376 U. Sullivan. 509 U. See Gertz v.

standards of tort liability tort damages THE LEGAL PROCESS civil procedure criminal law criminal procedure evidence wex definitions .