You are on page 1of 20

The Kinsey Institute Sexualizes Children—Yet Again!

Domestic Terrorism by “Academe”
.by
Judith Reisman (2002)
Author, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences
















The Kinsey Institute Normalizes Child Molestation.................................................................... 1
All Kinsey Institute Directors Must Cover Up Kinsey’s Child Rape Protocol.............................. 2
The Scope Of The Child Exploitation Pandemic ........................................................................ 3
Public Libraries Cultivate Child Sexual Abuse........................................................................... 3
Paroled Pedophiles Lusting At Your Local Library .................................................................... 4
Marauding, Molesting Teachers and School Superintendents ................................................... 5
Survivors Of Educator Abuse Emerge (Sesame) ........................................................................ 7
15% Of Students Say Sexually Abused By Faculty Or Staff ....................................................... 7
The ALA, ACLU and Kinsey Institute Are Pornography Grantees ............................................. 8
Briefly: Pornography’s Effect On The Developing Brain........................................................... 9
The Kaiser Family Foundation Survey .................................................................................... 10
Primitive, Potent Passions Bypass Thought and Speech........................................................... 11
4,200-19,000 Rapes/Sex Assaults “In Schools;” 60% Colleges Have Stalking.......................... 11
To Circumvent The Backlash Against Sex “Educators”........................................................... 14
Funding The Kinsey Institute “Sexual Development Conference” ........................................... 15
Conclusion: From a Child Centered to a Child Abuse Culture................................................. 16
Endnotes .................................................................................................................................. 16

The Kinsey Institute Normalizes Child Molestation
In the 1950s the United States was known as a “child centered culture.” Now we
are known as a “child abuse culture.” 1 What happened between 1950 and today?
[Reached via a Yahoo sadist-child abuse chat line] a 13-year-old girl from
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania was found chained to a bed in [a n adult sadist’s]
townhouse....The FBI had to use bolt cutters to free the girl, who
authorities believe had been in an online relationship with [the man]. 2
The battle lines are being drawn between the American public that seeks to
protect our vulnerable youth and that of corporate pornography terrorists who are waging
war everywhere for our children’s minds and bodies. What role does the Kinsey Institute
at Indiana University play in this battle? For, the Kinsey Institute has just announced that
they intend to “fill in the gaps” of “children’s sexuality.” 3
Toxic Kinseyan sexologists apparently believe they have not yet sufficiently
ripped opened the floodgates to the normalization of child sexual abuse in our nation. 4
Based on its history and its current cover-up and promotion of the Kinsey
Institute’s criminal child sexual abuse protocols (Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,
1948 and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, 1953), the Kinsey Institute leaders and

their allies now believe the time is ripe to fulfill Dr. Kinsey’s documented goal. On the
evidence, further provided here, the Kinsey goal was to eliminate (Judeo) Christianity, to
abolish all sex crime penalties and to fully legitimize adult homosexual and heterosexual
sexual access to infants and children. 5
The Kinsey Institute Directors Cover Up Institute’s Child Rape Protocol
The need to hide the Institute’s criminal secrets required that those chosen to
direct the Kinsey Institute after his untimely death (Drs. Paul Gebhard, June Reinisch and
John Bancroft) must willingly follow Kinsey’s footsteps by deliberately misleading the
nation with fraudulent information regarding the Institute’s research data and illegal
methodology. 6
In May, marketed by IU as a bastion of conservative but candid sexual research,
Dr. John Bancroft (with English accent) gathered together a like-minded gang he called
“level-headed” who plann to tell the world what “children's sexual development …the
important and little understood--aspect of human sexuality” is all about.7
Bancroft still illegally hides the Kinsey files that document 317 to 2,035 of
Kinsey’s little “pre-pubertal” victims, obstructing any justice or aid for these traumatized
child sex guinea pigs. Instead, showing no shame, Bancroft asks his conference elites,
“what methods are appropriate for studying sexual development of children and
adolescents?” “Is it possible to come to a consensus on what constitutes “normal” sexual
development?” A consensus from this group? The fox would always seek to guard the
chickens!
“Children are sexual beings in various ways,” intones Bancroft. He says it is tragic
that “we don't know very much about that.” Let me save everyone some time. What the
covert child molester-biased Kinsey Institute group will “scientifically” find will rescue
the sex industry (sex “education,” Planned Parenthood, pornographers, etc.) from future
public exposure and class action lawsuits.
Like Kinsey’s 1948 and 1953 research, these phony data will be broadcast worldwide
by an “unplanned” publicity blitz and marketed as though these were meticulously
assembled facts about child sex (always with parents present of course) just as Kinsey
fallaciously claimed. The results will be cited in academic journals of every discipline.
The popular press will quote the Kinsey Institute committee gurus, citing the team’s
“surprise” discovery (as did Kinsey) that children are allegedly libidinous in the womb
where they allegedly masturbate (based on phony sonograms) and that loving
homosexual or heterosexual promiscuous sex is rewarding and life saving for many
children whose loneliness is thus alleviated by an adult who cares and who looks after
them, etc.
The sexperts will “find” that the only real harm from pornography and adults
having sex with children (as Kinsey said) are the result of uptight, repressive views of
parents and religious, conservative, fearful, repressed, narrow minded, jealous, right wing

2

fanatics so we should lower or eliminate age of consent (as Kinsey said) we should sign
the United Nations declaration on the “rights of the child” which would free children
from parental domination and allow them (at any age) to choose sex, pornography, drugs
--should they so desire.
Fortunes are made by those who would sexualize our children. And, as child
molesters increase exponentially, their perverse number spirals ever upward among
covert state and national leaders everywhere—legislators, judges, teachers and scientists
included. As child pornography and prostitution emerge as a major national growth
industry, the carefully selected Kinsey Institute committee investigating “child sexuality”
will reap their desired privileges and rewards.
The Scope Of The Child Exploitation Pandemic
After decades of marketing child “sexuality” and promiscuity as harmless, school
sex educators helped make child sex Big Business. There are hundreds of thousands of
child sex abuse “consumers,” with more being spawned daily by the Internet, as the
industry grows exponentially to supply their demands and to increase the child abuse
consumer population. Only our waning child protective laws and our allegedly prudish
American public is containing this latest class of venture capitalists.
In 1972 Senator Birch Bayh, (D-IN), liberal former Chairman of the US Senate
Subcommittee to Investigate Juvenile Delinquency, confirmed that investigators put boy
prostitution at roughly 500,000 victims. 8 Lower yet still shocking figures, funded in part
by the U.S. Department of Justice, estimates 300,000-400,000 American children are
yearly exploited by adults in various forms of sex commerce. 9 Although homosexuals are
only 1 to 2% of the male population, at least fifty percent of the child victims are boys
abused by men. 10
This…is the first truly comprehensive look at child sexual exploitation in
the United States. Within the last five years, with the explosion of Internet
use, there has been a remarkable increase in sex crimes against juveniles.
The Internet has increased sex offenders' demand for new faces and
younger children. Many law enforcement officials were not aware of the
explosive growth in the last five years in this crime…Boys are victims just
as brutally and frequently as girls -- they just don't get as much attention. 11
Despite parents careful watch over their children, scores of little boys and girls are
annually kidnapped, commonly raped and some killed. Now the FBI reports “50,000
missing children” in the USA, No such FBI data were recorded in the 1950s. 12

Public Libraries Cultivate Child Sexual Abuse
Meanwhile, thanks to the political power of the American Library Association,
your local library is home to every form of paroled and unconvicted sexual criminal.
Here, in our schools and libraries, the front lines of the battle for our children’s minds and

3

future income is being waged by Internet pornography. 13 The Library Journal, a national
library publication, reported that:14
43 percent of libraries had filtering software on their Internet-connected
computers in 2001, a jump from just 31 percent a year earlier. The
increase coincides with the passage of the Children's Internet Protection
Act (CIPA), which requires federally funded schools and libraries to begin
blocking Web material deemed inappropriate for minors or risk losing
money. 15
Now the battle is being joined between the warring camps.
[A] group of free-speech advocates, including the American Library
Association and the American Civil Liberties Union, have sued to block
the law, saying it violates free-speech rights by, among other things,
blocking content that's legally protected for adults.”
San Francisco officials would forfeit federal library funds in order to filter only
for children “under the age of 13.”16
Naturally the Kinsey Institute supports the ALA and the ACLU since all three
groups, financially indebted to “grant” money from pornography donors, promote the
pornography traffic. 17 Later we shall address pornography’s damage to children’s
developing brains. For now we ask, are the rights of adults to media-induced-sexualarousal more important than children’s rights to a reality-based and balanced brain-mind
and memory?
Either in full view or behind bogus “privacy screens,” their libidos activated by
consuming Internet child and adult pornography, predators conduct illegal sexual acts in
public, deliberately traumatizing and victimizing the class of children and women who
attempt to use our libraries for bone fide educational and recreational purposes.
Paroled Pedophiles Lusting At Your Local Library
Post the Kinsey-triggered sexual revolution 18 schools and public libraries became
a haven for pornography and eventually for the violent sexual predators who feed on this
stimuli. 19 The Miami Herald interviewed a police officer involved in the hunt for
Internet child molesters.
The Internet is a new playground for pedophiles … We’ve arresting
firemen, lawyers, judges, teachers, coaches, cops – you name it…. The task
force arrested a prominent lawyer and former judge… [arranging] a sexual
relationship with a 14-year-old boy. 20
Note a few “on-site library” child pornography parolee crime examples: One
paroled child molester, carrying a “backpack filled with pornographic magazines”

4

crawled under the library table to molest “a 6-year-old girl at Hayden library” in
Spokane, Washington, while her father was at the desk getting her first library card. 21
As in most of these cases, the predator’s lawyer argued that the molester needed
more “treatment.” However a recent study by Dr. Linda Jeffrey found a) “The
Government Accounting Office reports no effective treatment to reduce recidivism in
550 therapeutic programs spanning 50 years.” 22 Yet b) the liberal American Bar
Association found 80% of convicted child molesters are paroled and serve no prison time.
Instead, the predator receives tax paid “treatment for his sexual orientation to children.” 23
Another paroled child molester “downloaded child pornography from
computers at the [Chicago] Vernon Hills Public Library” and was arrested when he
allegedly “returned to the library in December to download” more child pornography
despite being confined to home for an earlier child pornography conviction. 24 Another
paroled child molester at the Grand Rapids Michigan Public Library was arrested after
“e-mailing nude photos of himself to a 14-year-old girl.” 25
Marauding, Molesting Teachers and School Superintendents
As inexpensive as are computers now, only the most out-of-control predators
would risk stimulating their libidos in a public library. Yet, all across the nation, friends,
neighbors and responsible, educated professionals risk their reputations, lives and
families in their lust for child pornography. Just a few recent examples:
A camp counselor was sentenced to 65 years in prison for taking partially nude
photographs of teen boys while they slept and sending them through the Internet to a
friend overseas. 26 A Frederick County drama teacher was indicted in August on federal
child pornography charges. 27
The president of the Broward Teachers Union since 1979 was charged with
mailing Internet pornography to an undercover law enforcement officer posing as a 14year-old girl. 28
A famous Norfolk County, Massachusetts doctor who “burned the midnight oil
cruising for sex on the Internet” was on trial for murdering his wife, allegedly because
she discovered his secret Internet sex life “eight hours before she was murdered.” 29
A college professor was indicted for distributing thousands of images of child
pornography on the Internet…pandering obscenity involving a minor, promoting
prostitution, unauthorized use of property, wiretapping and tampering with evidence. 30
A Waukegan Wisconsin teacher was arrested for “using the Internet to arrange a
sexual encounter with an undercover police officer posing as a 14-year-old girl… child
enticement and solicitation.” 31
A Fairhaven High School science and math teacher and divorced father,
engaged in on-line sex acts after having recruited teenage girls to watch him. 32

5

A Perry Iowa Middle School principal was charged with child pornography and
“sexual exploitation of a minor.” 33
A Hammonton New Jersey school district superintendent was arrested for
sexually explicit Internet conversations with what he thought was a 13-year-old girl. 34
A Lowpoint-Washburn Illinois school superintendent used the school district
computer to view Internet pornographic sites. 35
A Burrillville school superintendent and his alleged ex-lover, director of a day
care center, “exchanged sexually explicit pictures of children in a series of e-mails while
they were having an affair in the 1990s “when the superintendent’s lover was president of
the Parent Teacher Organization.” 36
A Pell City Board of Education chairman and Homewood, Alabama chamber
of commerce official with an office in the basement of the Homewood public library
plead guilty to Internet child pornography. 37
A Sunday school teacher in Tulsa Oklahoma got more than 24 years in prison
for Internet-associated sex crimes against minors. 38
A school bus driver is charged with Internet child pornography involving four
boys…sodomy, aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse and endangering the welfare of a
child. 39 This is a rare admission of boy victims commonly obscured as “child.”
When doctors, teachers, superintendents, principals, school or library board
members are secret sexual predators, honesty and justice are polluted, influencing votes,
jobs, medical, legal and other decisions. Note the following judge and city mayor:
“Judge Molestation” 40 “Ronald Craver Kline “An Orange County Superior
Court judge was indicted on federal charges of possessing child pornography [and] lewd
conduct with a 12-year-old boy. Kline wrote one boy that he cared about him, requesting
that the boy "please not bring pajamas” on their planned vacation. 41
Waterbury Connecticut Mayor Philip Giordano, the Republican who ran
unsuccessfully against Senator Joseph Lieberman in the fall of 2001, was arrested for
using the Internet to “lure a minor under the age of 16 into sex.” 42

6

Survivors Of Educator Abuse Emerge (Sesame)
While judges, prosecutors and doctors have been convicted of child sexual abuse,
child predators independently and organizationally, seek out jobs or volunteer where they
can have legitimate and easy access to children, in
libraries, and schools as music, team coaches, scout,
youth leaders and such. The pederast magazine Palavar
warns molesters how to avoid arrest while obtaining
children.
“If you want to spend all your time with children
you must have a legitimate reason for doing so; as a
teacher helping children learn…as a social worker
helping children in difficulties; as a play or youth
leader helping children to enjoy their leisure
time…child care, youth work, teaching… charity
and voluntary organizations catering for the needs
of children; there is the Free School movement;
children’s rights’ and various alternative life-style projects…We believe
that a paedophile relationship is no less legitimate and no more potentially
harmful to a child than a normal parental relationship.” 43 [Emphasis
added.]
“SESAME,” which calls itself “A Voice for the Prevention of Sexual
Exploitation, Abuse, and Harassment of Students by Teachers and Other School Staff,”
points to a toxic, predatory and significant subset of the teaching population. SESAME
reports that the Journal of Education Research (1991) finds in its "Survey of high school
graduates …13.5% of those surveyed said they had engaged in sexual intercourse
with a teacher.” 44
15% Of Students Say Sexually Abused By Faculty Or Staff
In yet another survey reported by SESAME, “The best estimate is that 15% of
students will be sexually abused by a member of the school staff during their school
career.” 45 46 And, “Many abusers are in positions of power or trust in relation to their
victims which makes it easier to overcome a child's resistance.” 47
Five Child molester Headmasters: With today’s opportunities to eroticize the
library and the school, responsible adults are obliged to question which of those adults
“helping” children on sexuality issues are themselves child molesters or their naïve
supporters. We now know Kinsey, for example,
was deeply influenced by five paedophile headmasters who were quite
clear they had very warm relationships with young adolescent boys of
twelve or thirteen [in one New England area]. 48

7

Particularly as pornography seduces and habituates even well educated men and
women, vulnerable boys and girls are increasingly at risk from this growing molester
constituency. 49 Just in the last few years the National Institutes of Health luminary and
Nobel Prize winner, Dr. Carleton Gadjusek, American University President Dr. Richard
Berendzen and American University psychology department head Elliot McGinnies, were
each convicted of child molestation associated felonies. 50 Degrees in higher education no
longer appear to work to restrain many child molesters.
The ALA, ACLU and Kinsey Institute Are Pornography Grantees
Since both have been funded by pornographers, on the evidence, the American
Library Association (ALA) and the Kinsey Institute are pornographically compromised.
As a member of The Media Coalition, the ALA commonly acts as a friend of
pornographers in court cases, while a law suit by the Kinsey Institute settled in 1957
broke the ban against transporting pornography through the U.S. mails based on Kinsey’s
false claim that his interest was for “scientific” and non “prurient” purposes. 51
In New York v. Ferber (458 U.S. 103, 1982) the ALA argued for Ferber, claiming
parents and guardians rights--to use, coerce or force their children of all ages--to be
filmed or photographed in “Sexual Conduct,” defined as:
[A]ctual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual
bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse or lewd exhibition of the
genitals. 52
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously
ruled against Ferber, noting this would legalize
child sexual abuse (as a for-profit family
business). In 1994 the ALA was repudiated by
the United States Court of Appeals, District of
Columbia for the ALA’s defense of child
pornographers. 53 San Francisco’s ALA gave its
library rooms to NAMBLA (the North
American Man Boy Love Association) as a
meeting place. The use of its prestige to aid
child molesters/pornographers further supports
the ALA’s financial and personal commitment
to normalizing a historically "anti-American"
cultural standard -- adult sexual assault of
children.
The pornographer-ALA control of our tax funded public libraries and librarians is
impressively demonstrated by the union’s refusal to filter criminally violent pornography
even from children, despite a mandate from elected American legislators.

8

Briefly: Pornography’s Effect On The Developing Brain
Stepping now into cellular reality; reading must be taught. Seeing is instinctive.
So, while the undeveloped child brain is often unable to process text, it is
psychopharmacologically altered by pornographic stimuli during waking and sleeping.
This invalidates free speech opinions of “informed consent” as the neurochemistry of the
child’s brain, sense of self and reality is altered, negatively “impact[ing] on the immune
system." 54
The following are short excerpts from the author’s monograph, “The
Psychopharmacology of Pictorial Pornography: Restructuring Brain, Mind & Memory,”
(originally written for the Ontario Human Rights Commission) available on request.
How does pornography affect the scientifically encoded view of the three main
functions, goals and objectives of the developing human brain? These are: 1) to be alert,
awake, aware of reality; 2) to collect and store environmental information; and 3) to
monitor and correct our conduct for health and well-being? 55 The above graphic, taken
from the National Institute of Health brochure, addresses the differences between the
adult and child brain, specifically the child’s “gut” emotional responses to fearful and/or
sexually arousing, confusing, anxiety producing stimuli.
Teens [and children] process emotions differently than adults. Viewing
emotional images…teens... activated the amygdala, a brain center that
mediates fear and other “gut” reactions, more than the frontal [rational]
lobe. 56
So, how is the developing brain restructured by the pornographic vision of
reality? Such states of sexual or fear arousal (a child’s response to a flash of
pornographic stimuli), says neuropsychologist Margaret Kemeny, trigger an “an
adrenaline rush, our pupils dilate, and our heart starts to race.”57
What happened to the brains minds and memories of the nine out of ten children
between eight and 16 years old, that the London School of Economics reported, had seen
degrading Internet pornography? About half of the children in the study were
approached by strangers in "chatrooms," some for sex. Most of the children’s initial
pornography access was unintentional. 58 What kind of fear and shame and curiosity did
the nascent 11-year-old libido experience when that child logged into a website labeled
"Adolf Hitler pictures" and instead saw "gaysexfreepics" child pornography? 59
And how did the nascent libidos of the 10 and 12 year old brothers respond to the
homosexual pornography they viewed instead of the band “Boyxone”? What of the 10
year old girl who saw topless women instead of the Spice Girls? Or how was the brainmind-memory of the 13-year-old girl researching the White House restructured when she
got a porn site, or the 15-year-old girl researching "money" when she got a prostitution
website? 60

9

The Kaiser Family Foundation Survey
And what follow-up is there for these violated children? How many, confused by
fear and premature sexual stimulation will act out what they have seen—and what is
commonly, involuntarily, replayed in their unconscious sleep--on innocent family,
friends, strangers?
The very liberal Kaiser Family Foundation admitted that in their sample of 1524 year-olds surveyed, 45% of those exposed to Internet pornography reported they were
“very” or “somewhat” upset while 55% were “not too” upset or “not at all” upset.
Kaiser does not reveal what percentage of their child subjects said they were “not
too upset” (which means they were “upset”!). Clearly a majority of the Kaiser children
said they were “upset” by online pornography exposure. In yet another violation of
common scientific protocol, Kaiser does not reveal the gender or ages of their “upset”
versus “not at all” upset children.
Moreover, Kaiser admitted that two out of three (65%) children said pornography
could have a “serious impact” on children under 18. A seriously negative impact is
implicit. While Kaiser, again, chose to avoid revealing their definition of “impact” they
do disclose 59% of the Kaiser children warning that pornography encourages children to
have sex.
Kaiser reports that among the 95% of all 15-17 year-olds who have ever gone
online 67% want laws requiring Internet filters in schools and libraries, while fully
seventy percent say they have accidentally stumbled across pornography online, 23%
“very” or somewhat” often. 61
If Libraries Encourage Readers They Encourage Pornography Consumers
What happens to these children (“seeing is believing”) as they process the
shocking exaggerated, impossible, demeaning, heartless, souless distortions of
pornographic performers? NIH neurologist Paul McLean writes:
Man relies largely on vision to relieve his uncertainty about the nature of
things…Given the seed of suspicion, the human mind is capable of
developing any kind of paranoid hybrid …[There is] an unpleasant
feeling of fear attached to something that cannot be clearly identified. 62
And, MacLean’s observations that the brain cannot distinguish real from false
images is critical for children whose “plastic” brains, in developmental formation, are
viewing the bizarre world of pornographic displays
When nature gave man the prefrontal neocortex for anticipation and
connected it with his cortical areas, she failed to provide a radar
antenna and viewing screen. 63…[The] biological evidence [is] that

10

learning involves a physical change in the circuitry of the brain…
[T]he brain processes a visual image, the signal from the screen
flashes though the eyes and rushes through the brain in 3/10ths of
a second. 64
Pornographic imagery perceived by the brain as reality, is uniquely powerful
because, its false information and associated emotions can have long-lasting effects on
the brain structure, memory, and the libido. Drs. Restak, Edward Sheradin, MacLean, 65
and other specialists, agree that the scholarly data find no apparatus to distinguish real
images from media fantasy. The brain processes as real what the eyes see.
Primitive, Potent Passions Bypass Thought and Speech
Neuropsychologist Daniel Goleman reports that strong memories commonly
overwhelm weaker memories and that sensory signals from eye or ear reach the
amygdala for response—even in adults--long before the neocortex is alerted:
[F]eelings…bypass the neocortex. Those feelings that take the direct
route through the amygdala include our most primitive and potent; this
circuit does much to explain the power of emotion to overwhelm
rationality…[LeDoux discovered]...something like a neural back alley—
[that] allows the amygdala to receive some direct inputs from the senses
and start a response before they are fully registered by the neocortex. 66
Gary Lynch of the University of California at Irvine points out that a word or
sight, libidinous or spiritual, can immediately alter brain structure:
[I]n a matter of seconds, taking an incredibly modest signal, a word....
which is in your head as an electrical signal for no more than a few
seconds, can...leave a trace that will last for years. 67
And, UCLA psychologist, Dr. Margaret Kemeny explained to television maven,
Bill Moyers:
Although it seems intangible, anytime we feel anything, anytime we think
anything, anytime we imagine anything, there is activity in the brain that is
taking place in the body at that time. That activity can then lead to a
cascade of changes in the body that have an impact on health. 68
In sum, “virtual” or real pornographic images will trigger similar, measurable
states of nascent or mature libidinous arousal registered as lust, shame, fear and the like,
capturing “large areas of uncommitted brain tissue [that] can be molded...to the demands
of a particular environment.”69 This is an environment in which children’s experiences of
“fear” and other primitive “gut” reactions to sex overwhelm cognition. 70
4,200 to 19,000 Rapes/Sex Assaults “In Schools;” 60% of Colleges Report Stalking

11

The U.S. Department of Education and the Department of Justice “Indicators of School Crime
and Safety 1999” report (1996 to 1997) reported 4,200 cases of “rape or other type of sexual
battery” against students (forcible sodomy, etc). 71 as well as over a 9% increase in what are called
“nonfatal crimes” against children,” away from school.” 72

I confirmed a small New York Times mention of school sex abuse in a DOJ
report estimating “12,000 rapes and sexual assaults” 74 “inside school building/on school
property” in 1994, 75 with DOJ estimating 19,000 such school-based rapes and sex
assaults in 1999. 76 Whether these are real measures or just bizarre DOJ estimates, the
“free press” mandate is to inform the polity regarding events meaningful to our lives and
our concerns so that we may make proper decisions about these issues. Yet school
primary school sexual violence data are seldom seen as a major press headline, in say, the
newspaper of record, nor on major television news, where it belongs.
73

You may however
have read a USA Today
Colleges Reporting "Stalking" & Student Pathology
item reporting “stalking”
as a common crime in
Counseled for
U.S. and Canadian
Stalking
colleges. While campus
rape is now all too
Psycholoical
frequent—Ivy League to
hospitalization
local college--of 274
centers responding to an
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
International Association
of Counseling Services
survey of U.S. and Canadian college campuses; 89% reported students hospitalized for
psychological problems (including suicide) while an astounding 60% reported “students
counseled in stalking incidents” (no victim gender is provided) in 2000-2001. 77
One fallout from either forced or “consensual” early sexual activity tends to be
the child’s belief that s/he brought this sex crime (stalking, rape, fondling, etc.) upon
herself or himself and thus must be “bad.” It is therefore not uncommon for child sex
victims to engage in sexually promiscuous conduct after their violation, including
prostitution; being paid to perform acts they were originally tricked or forced into.
But such activity has been brazenly encouraged by school sex educrats who
seduce their young charges into hetero/homosexual promiscuity via “non-judgmental”
graphically libidinous “sex education” materials, with the premier sex education training
center, The Institute For the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality requiring that their
sexology graduates support legalization of child prostitution and child pornography. 78
Now, public librarians--controlled by the Kinseyan contaminated ALA—further
corrupt the public environment by turning this critical social resource into the equivalent
of local “bars” that fuel up predators of every deviant stripe, especially those who are
“stalkers” of their library, school or neighborhood prey.

12

Which brings us fore square back to Indiana University’s toxic Kinsey Institute.
In the recent Kinsey Today newsletter, John Bancroft released the public relations
announcement explaining the Kinsey Institute’s “Sexual Development Conference:
Mapping Uncharted Territory.” 79
Bancroft carefully selected like-minded eductrats whose “level-headed” research
on “child sexuality” will redress Kinsey’s brutal child sexuality crimes reported in his
Male and Female volumes. The Kinsey Institute republished both books in 1998--absent
disclaimers.
Just as Indiana University marketed the deviant and sadistic Kinsey as a suit-and-tie,
clean shaven neutral academic, just so does Indiana University market Kinsey’s heir, Dr.
Bancroft as a conservatively sophisticated and neutral academic. It took 50 years to
expose Kinsey and his hand-picked team as sexual predators who thrilled to the secret
child sex experiments and secret filming of their illegal sex orgies in public baths, in the
Kinsey home attic and in IU’s sound proofed campus offices.
As many now know, the Kinsey team had employed scores of child molesters
rape and sodomize 317 to 2,035 fainting, convulsing and screaming infants and children
(the youngest, said Kinsey, being 2 months old) for their child sexuality “data.” At least
one of Kinsey’s child molester coworkers was a German Nazi, Dr. Friz von Balluseck,
living in Frankfort Germany who followed Kinsey’s directions in a kind of international
how-to-rape-a-child-scientifically-correspondence course. Impossible? 80 Listen to Tim
Tate, NESCO and Amnesty International Award-winning producer/director:
In the course of producing my documentary—Kinsey’s Paedophiles—it
became clear that every substantive allegation Reisman made was not only
true but thoroughly sourced with documentary evidence—despite the
Kinsey Institute’s reluctance to open its files. 81
“Objective” Sex Scientists Defraud the Polity
Both of Kinsey’s recent admiring biographers 82 admit that the father of the sexual
revolution was a bi/homosexual, pornographically obsessed sadomasochist who only
“enjoyed” sex if he was brutally tortured, even circumcising himself with a knife sans
anesthesia. 83 Therefore it makes sense that Kinsey would tell the world that sodomized
babies who convulsed, who were “hysterically weeping” and trying to “get away” from
their rapists, really “definitely enjoyed…the experience.” 84 And it makes sense that
Kinsey’s pornography-funded followers will try to “prove” Kinsey was right all along.
In 2001 David Finkelhor, director of the “Crimes Against Children Research
Center” at the University of New Hampshire, a Kinsey Conference attendee, co-authored
a monograph for The U.S. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
(OJJDP) claiming a “Decline in Child Sexual Abuse Cases. 85 The Jones-Finkelhor
research ignored child sex abuse victims under age 12 as well as the 19,000 recorded
school sex assaults in 1999 with no mention of the 300,000 to 400,000 child victims

13

reported in the Estes data cited earlier. Jones-Finkelhor apparently labeled commercial
child exploitation a “consensual” activity.
Another Kinsey Institute discussant, Anke Ehrhardt was Dr. John Money’s longtime co-author. Money was the discredited scientist responsible for training doctors
worldwide in “gender reassignments,” (carving girls out of baby boys) when doctors
decided the phallus was inadequate, etc. Ehrhardt never disclosed Money’s scientific
frauds and crimes against children, including his 1991 interview in Paidika, The Journal
of Paedophilia, when he advocated sex with children and legalizing sexual murder,
should the boy in a pedophile “sex ritual” allegedly “consent” to die. 86
Said Money’s sexpert colleague Ehrhardt, 87 "Sexuality isn't something that just
suddenly starts in adolescence. We need to take a long-term look at sexual development."
The attendees eagerly nod. They will “educate” us about “real” child sexuality.
Bancroft, Ehrhardt, et al., would dispose of the hormonal changes of puberty as the
physiological beginning of children’s sexual stirrings. Instead, this multidisciplinary
sexpert gang would legalize Kinsey’s infant and child “sexuality” norm. Said another
conference attendee:
It's very important to bring together people with different backgrounds
to focus on children's sexuality, because this area is typically looked at
only through the lens of abuse. Normal developmental issues have been
almost entirely neglected and ignored. 88
To Circumvent The Backlash Against Sex “Educators”
The mounting American anger, fear and outrage at child sex abuse requires a
major preemptive strike by child sex traffickers. Ergo, the Kinsey child sex conference
that they said, “comes at a critical historical moment.” For this the Kinsey Institute
launched ‘Totalitarian Propaganda 101.’ They brought “psychologists, psychiatrists,
clinicians, historians, anthropologists, sociologists, social workers, and other
professionals to the table.” These men and women will serve the interests of the Kinsey
Institute, the ALA and pornographers.
The two recent “developmental issues” which must be vigorously countered by
Kinseyans appeared in Psychoneuroendocrinology and in Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
Both studies revealed that early sexual exposure involving sexual activity has lasting,
detrimental effects on children. 89 Moreover, the findings fully support the information on
brain-mind and memory discussed earlier in this paper.
The first study used magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the brains of
32 adults, 18 to 22, half of whom had been sexually abused. The latter “had changes in
the blood flow and function of a brain region called the cerebellar vermis,” which
changes when people abuse drugs.

14

This part of the brain has been recently implicated in the coordination of
emotional behavior, is strongly affected by alcohol, cocaine, and other
drugs of abuse, and may help regulate dopamine, a neurotransmitter
critically involved in addiction. 90
The cerebellar vermis develops slowly and can be affected easily by stress
hormones, producing brain damage. Another study just released by a University of
Buffalo, New York team, found post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can also increase
the craving for drugs in abuse victims 91 said psychiatry professor Scott Coffey:
From our research with trauma victims, we know that intrusive trauma
memories are very upsetting to patients, and now we have shown that
these trauma memory-induced negative emotions increase craving in
substance abusers with PTSD.
Neither William Friedrich (the Mayo Psychiatry and Psychology Treatment
Center), Ehrhardt, Finklehor or any other conference attendees challenged the Kinsey
Institute as an international pornography advocate and trafficker—as producing perhaps
thousands of child trauma victims—and as crafting the child sex fraud that launched the
current child sex abuse epidemic in the first place.
Funding The Kinsey Institute “Sexual Development Conference”
Funded by the W. T. Grant Foundation, The Kinsey Institute has also received
direct and indirect funds from federal and state largess, Ford, Rockefeller and other
“philanthropists.” The group “consensus statement on normal childhood sexual
development” is planned:
[T]he Sexual Development Conference…brought the right people together
to address the topic in an authoritative, serious, open way. We wanted to
try to carefully map out what is known and what is not known, and start
filling in the gaps. This conference was an essential first step in that
direction. 92
The upcoming Kinsey Institute committee report on child sexuality will, as
discussed earlier, provide cover to the failed sex education programs of Planned
Parenthood, SIECUS, and their satellites, giving these organizations ammunition to
justify their history of a) pandering pornography to children and b) encouraging any form
of normal or deviant sex, including sex with adults. The PP “manifesto” released in April
proclaimed that children of all ages should have the right to express sexuality “in the way
they choose…[and] must be supported by laws that will allow them to act freely in the
way they choose to live their lives.” 93 Indeed, when trusted adults convince children they
are “sexual beings” who can live their lives as sexual adventurers, then child sexuality
becomes Biggg Business.

15

The Kinsey Institute conference is designed to help undermine recent studies
proving (gosh) child sexual abuse is harmful! The Kinsey Institute used their fraudulent
"scientific" findings from child sex offenders to spawn the field of human sexuality and
to “prove” that not only are children sexual from birth but that forced sex at any age is
pleasurable and beneficial for the abused children. The theories, beliefs and practices of
Planned Parenthood, SIECUS, et al., that underpin all comprehensive or “accredited” sex
education are based on these fraudulent and criminally violent acts committed by the
Kinsey Institute against children.
Conclusion: From a Child Centered to a Child Abuse Culture
We asked at the outset why, in the 1950s the United States was known as a “child
centered culture” and why now we are known as a “child abuse culture?” What went
wrong between 1950 and today?
We discovered that for over 50 years our moral culture--especially the idea that
caring for and protecting children was of a significantly higher value than permitting
open access for adult sexual pleasure--has sustained an unrelenting bombardment by
“civil libertarians” falsely wrapped in the flag of “Free Speech” rights. The result is our
current child abuse culture, festering and breeding widespread brutality and a return to
the darkest abyss of primitive barbarism.
Unless our polity decides to do battle for our children—as in a real war—the
Kinsey Institute, its new committee examining “child sexuality” and pornography’s other
fellow travelers will finally realize the ambition of its sexual psychopathic founder, Dr.
Alfred Kinsey. If they have their way, be assured, no child will be safe in a library, a
school, a church, or in ones own upscale, suburban back yard, even if dad and mom do
stand but a few feet away. 94
Endnotes
1

Report of the Illinois Commission on Sex Offenders, March 15, 1953, at 9. The report identifies Alfred
C. Kinsey and W. B. Pomeroy as members of the workgroup addressing “Framework for Sex
Offender Laws.” The Introduction to the “Illinois Commission on Sex Offenders” in 1953 states,
“The Kinsey findings… permeate all present thinking on this subject.” Kinsey advised the
commission, which concluded that women and children were too protected in the law saying a
“cultural tendency to overprotect women and children” is more “detrimental” to victims than are
sex crimes.
2
The Culture and Family Institute January 16, 2002 citing to The Washington Post, “Bond Denied in Teen
Girl's Abduction,” January 9, 2002; Page A06.
3
Kinsey Today, “Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction,” Vol. 5, No. 2,
Fall/Winter, 2001, pg. 1.
4
Id., Kinsey Today.
5
See Judith Reisman, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, Institute for Media Education, Crestwood, KY,
1998, pp. 134-180.
6
Id., Reisman, 49-129.
7
Kinsey Today, The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction, Fall/Winter 2001,
Volume 5, Number 2, p. 1.

16

8

Robin Lloyd, FOR MONEY OR LOVE, BOY PROSTITUTION IN AMERICA, Introduction by Senator Birch Bayh, (D-IN),
Ballantine Books, New York, 1976 at book jacket cover.
9
CNN Law.com, “Child sex abuse reaches 'epidemic' levels in U.S., study says” September 10, 2001.
10

Id., CNN Law.com.
Interview with the Principal Investigator, Richard Estes. University of Pennsylvania professor.
12
ABC’s 20/20 Downtown, “A Missing Girls Mystery,” January 16, 2002.
13
David Burt, Dangerous Access: The Epidemic of Pornography in America’s Public Libraries and the
Threat to Children, Filtering Facts, 1999, online at: http://www.frc.org/get/bl063.cfm.
14
Lisa M. Bowman, ZDNet News, January 10, 2002.
15
Id., ZDNet News.
16
Id., ZDNet News
17
Cliff Kinkaid, The Playboy Foundation: A Mirror of the Culture? Capital Research Center, 1992, pp. 7376.
18
Id., 6., Reisman, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, see especially Chapters 2 and 8.
19
Id., “Reported and Unreported Teacher-Student Sexual Harassment” Journal of Ed Research, Vol 3,
1991, pp. 164, 69.
20
Andrea Elliot, The Miami Herald, April 2, 2000, “Police hunt pedophiles on Web.”
21
Id, 2., Gaddy, Spokane Spokesman-Review..
22
Sex Offender Treatment: Research Results Inconclusive About What Works to Reduce Recidivism, June
21, 1996. GAO/GGD-96-137.
23
“The Probation Response to Child Sexual Abuse Offenders: How Is It Working?” American Bar
Association, State Justice Institute, Grant, SJI-88-11J-E-015, 1990, at 7.
24
The Chicago Tribune. January 11, 2002, Metro, p. 4.
25
Grand Rapids Press, Grand Rapids, Michigan, July 27, 2001.
26
The Associated Press, Andrea Elliot, “Internet Child Porn Round Up Vol. 1, No. 2. Week of August 11,
2001, davidburt@christianemail.com.
27
The Baltimore Sun, “Internet Child Porn Round Up.” August 10, 2001.
28
Sun-Sentinel, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, , Broward Metro Edition, July 28, 2001 p. 3B.
29
The Boston Globe, Mac Daniel, June 14, 2001.
30
The Plain Dealer, Cleveland Ohio, October 27, 2001 Metro, pg. B7
31
Chicago Daily Herald, November 16, 2001, pg. 5.
32
The Boston Globe, Megan Tench, August 18, 2001.
33
The Associated Press October 24, 2001.
34
The Associated Press October 26, 2001.
35
Copley News Service, Illinois, also see the Peoria Journal Star, May 31, 2001.
36
The Associated Press, October 23, 2001.
37
The Associated Press October 23, 2001.
38
The Tulsa World October 16, 2001.
39
The Associated Press November 13, 2001.
40
The City News Service, Irvine California, January 10, 2000.
41
Los Angeles Times November 29, 2001, Orange County Edition, Part 2; Page 3.
42
Boston Globe, “Arrest of mayor stuns Conn. City,” July 27, 2001.
43
Palaver 6, for “Paedophile Awareness & Liberation,” Rising Free, London, October 1976, pp. 2,3, 4.
44
SESAME brochure, 1996, Shakeshaft, Ph.D., Hofstra University Testimony, The New York State
Commission on Children and Families, February 2, 1998 at 1.
45
Id. SESAME.
46
Id., SESAME, The Kingston Whig-Standard, Ontario, September 13, 1997, at. 1.
47
Supra., see David Finkelhor, “Child Sexual Abuse: New Theory and Research,” 1984, at 1.
48
England’s Yorkshire television, “SECRETS: Kinsey’s Paedophiles,” Tim Tate producer, director,
interview with Jonathan Gathorne-Hardy, Kinsey biographer, in the author’s archive, June 17,
1998, Tape #SP 27 & 28, at. 46.
49
Judith Reisman, Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler, Prepared
under Grant No. 84-JN-AX-K007, U.S. Department of Justice, Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention Division, (1984). Kinseyan sex science leader, John Money of Johns Hopkins was
exposed February 11, 2000, “Dateline” as well as on “Oprah” and the “Today Show” as a sadistic,
11

17

pedophilic-oriented psychopath. See As Nature Made Him by John Colapinto, Harper-Collins,
New York, 2000, for the story behind Money’s sex change operations at Johns Hopkins.
50
See Accuracy in Academia, “Cover-Up at American University?” November, 1991, Volume VI, Number
11, at 1, 5. as well as articles on President Richard Barendzen (“Obscene Phone Calls Are Traced
to AU President,” The Washington Post, April 25, 1990, A24. “Educator accused of sex abuse”
noted AU psychology head, Dr. McGinnies’ confession to the crime, The [Baltimore] Evening
Sun, June 19, 1986, D-16 (the story never appeared in the Washington, DC papers), and “Nobel
Winner Guilty of Abusing Boy,” The Washington Post, February 9, 1997, at A-1.
51
Id., Reisman, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, p. 239.
52
The New York Times, May 13, 1981, see also the Editorial in the NYT supporting the ALA position.
53
American Library Association v. Reno, No. 92-5271, slip op. at 28, 1994.
54
Margaret Kemeny, in Bill Moyers’ BBC program on Richard Restak, The Brain Learning & Memory,,
The Annenberg/ CPB Collection, WNET/New York., eight one-hour brain-mind-memory and
behavior programs, 1984.
55
A.R. Luria in Daniel Goleman and Richard Davidson, Eds., Consciousness, Brain, States of Awareness,
and Mysticism. Harper & Row, New York, 1979, at 10.
56
Image and brochure text taken from the National Institute of Mental Health No, 01-4929, on display at
the exhibit on the brain at the Smithsonian, December 29, 2001, co-sponsored by NIMH and the
Smithsonian.
57
Bill Moyers, Healing and the Mind, Doubleday, New York, 1993, at 199.
58
The News Telegraph.com, United Kingdom, The London School of Economics study reported on
25/11/2001
59
Supra,The News Telegraph.com.
60
Supra, The News Telegraph.
61
“Generation RX,” 2002, kff.org/content/2001/20011211a/GenerationRx.pdf , Kaiser Family Foundation.
62
Paul McLean in Goleman, Consciousness, at 24-25
63
Supra, MacLean.
64
Id, Moyers, The Brain, Learning and Memory.
65
Personal conversations, consultations, circa February 1993, Washington, DC.
66
A.R. Luria in Goleman, Consciousness, at 18.
67
Id, Richard Restak in Moyers’, The Brain ."Learning & Memory."
68
Id, Restak/Moyers, The Brain.
69
Jane Healy, Endangered Minds, Simon and Schuster, New York. 1990. See "Minds at Risk," The
Washington Post, July 29, 1991, C5.
70
Id., NIMH and the Smithsonian.
71
Id., Indicators. p. 63.
72
US Dpt. of Education and US Dpt of Justice, Indicators of School Crime and Safety, 1999 September
1999, p. 47.
73
Judith Reisman, “The FBI Uniform Crime Report Minimizes Child Sexual Abuse The Kinsey Effect,”
The Institute for Media Education, Crestwood, KY, 2001, p. 6.
74
NYT, June 3, 2001. Note the July 9, 1999 Heights Hackensack University Medical Center News, (New
Jersey) reported “Sate Lawmakers urge redefining of sex crime,” due to the “narrow definition of
rape created by the FBI and followed by New Jersey State Police.” Assemblywoman Rose Marie
Heck stated “If we don’t see the crimes in print, then we’re going to think they’re not happening
anymore.” See www.bergen.com/news/scrimerg19990787.htm.
75
Dear Dr. Reisman: According to our data, there were approximately 12,000 rapes in or around schools in
1994. In 1999 (the most recent data that we have), there were over 19,000 rapes that occurred in
or around schools. This information came from the National Criminal Victimization Survey. You
can access the 1994 data in the report "Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1994,"
http://www.ojp.usDOJ.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvius94.pdf. The data can be found in Table 63 (which is
located on page 61). For the 1999 data, you can take a look at "Criminal Victimization in the
United States, 1999 Statistical Tables." National Crime Victimization Survey, January 2001.
[383,170,000 rapes and sexual assaults, 8.9% “inside school building or on school property”
compared to 1.8% taking place “on public transport or inside station”] at
http://www.ojp.usDOJ.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus99.pdf. This data was also on Table 63. These are all

18

age 12 and over only data. You also may want to take a look at some of the reports that we have
available on crime that is committed in schools. “1999 Annual Report on School Safety” ages 12
through 18 although they too clearly had data on “elementary school” age children. Out of 72
pages, 25 cites were to “hate crimes” and 2 cites to rape with no specific data broken out regarding
the numbers of rapes in schools each year. Rape is lumped together with assaults and robbery and
such. So while there were 46 killings in schools 1997-8 compared to roughly 16,000 reported
rapes, there is no call from schools or the justice system demanding accountability for the sexual
violence visited against mostly, young girls.] You can access them from our Web site at
http://virlib.ncjrs.org/juv.asp?category=47&subcategory=185. If you have any further questions,
please feel free to write back and thanks for using AskNCJRS. Ken M, Information Specialist,
NCJRS. Email received 7/23/2001.
76
DOJ Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1994, and same document, 1999, Table 63 via “Percent
of Incidents” in a series of locations. DOJ buries the school abuse data in % of incidents, in two
columns, “strangers, non strangers” requiring extrapolation from number of incidents, etc., by
noting only the percent of each group that experienced “rape/sexual assaults” with 12 choices for
crime location. These data do not appear to have been designed for easy public access.
77
USA Today, Rochelle Sharpe, January 25, 2002, pp. 1, 4A; fully 30% of these colleges reported at least
one student who committed suicide while 10% did so while in counseling.
78
Id., Reisman, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, p. 81, chapter 4.
79
Id., Kinsey Today.
80
Id; Reisman, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, p. 137 and chapter 10.
81
See Tim Tate’s statement, back cover of Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, addressed elsewhere.
82
James Jones and Johathan Gathorne-Hardy, both interviewed in the Yorkshire television documentary,
“Kinsey’s Paedophiles” August 10, 1998.
83
See James H. Jones, Kinsey: A Private/Public Life, W.W. Norton, New York, 1997, pp. 604-607.
84
Id, Reisman, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, Chapter 7.
85
Lisa Jones and David Finkelhor, The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP),
“The Decline in Child Sexual Abuse Cases,” January 2001.
86
John Money, Paidika, The Journal of Paedophilia, Volume 2, No. 3, Issue 7, Summer 1991, pp. 7-8.
87
Anke Ehrhardt is HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute
director.
88
Id, Kinsey Today, p. 1.
89
For more information on Kinsey’s fraud read Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences.
90
Carl Anderson, et al., Psychoneuroendocrinology, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, January
2002.
91

CNN.com, Scott Coffey et.al., Medical University of South Carolina; University of Buffalo, May 2002.

92

Id, Kinsey Today, p. 1.
Tom Hess, in Family Resources Center News, “Planned Parenthood Declares Teenage Sex and
Inalienable Right,” January February 2002, page 13.
94
Id., Gaddy, Spokane Spokesman.
93

ADDENDUM
In 2000, a group of Minnesota Public Librarians became so fearful for
their own personal safety and the safety of children that they filed an Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit against the Minneapolis
Library System--charging that the sexually explicit materials they were forced to
see created a hostile work environment. In May, 2001, the EEOC ruled in their
favor. Judith Krug, Director of the far left ACLU/Media Coalition funded group the

Office For Intellectual Freedom American Library Association, reported that “the

19

Minneapolis Public Library was told they should pay money damages of $75,000 to
each” complaining librarian.
The EEOC ruling means that libraries without filtering systems on their
computers are forcing their employees to work in unsafe and sexually hostile
working environments. These employees can legally sue their employers for
damages!
Cites: http://www.mediainstitute.org/ONLINE/FAM2002/Online_C.html and Traditional Values
Coalition, conservativepetitions.com.

20