This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Can one even pose such a question? Maybe not, but after having read The History of Freemasonry, compiled and printed by Alex Lawry in 1805, a very ‘proper’ but somewhat empty explanation in relation to ‘The Second Messiah’, written by Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas in 1997 and published in 1998 by Arrow Books. Knight and Lomas are Freemasons but their research was much more extensive than that of Lawry back in 1805, both Knight and Lomas are also respected researchers, and have a healthy interest in the historical field. Lawry completely left out the period immediately before and after the life of Jesus, Knight and Lomas on the other hand mentioned quite a few shocking events which took place just before his birth, during his life, and after the crucifixion. One very disturbing inclusion is this; according to these two, Lomas had a conversation with the historian and writer Dr Tim Wallace-Murphy, who told him this story, which he claimed were told to him by a direct descendant of a Templar called Hugues de Payen; if you are not sitting down I suggest now is a good time to find a chair, this is “SHOCKING”. Before we start the story it is necessary to give you a bit more background, please stay with me. In my own research, done before I read any of the books mentioned while studying the Bible and reading up on some science, history and books written by various authors on alien existence it became clear to me that the Christian religion was not as transparent as we like to believe, or as the compilers of that religion want us to believe, many of my findings and opinions can be found in two of the three books written by me on the subject, these two books; “Jesus the Keeper of the Truth” http://www.authorhouse.com/bookstore/itemDetail.aspx? bookid=59758 , and “Unchaste Deception” http://www.lulu.com/content/2486291 , were written before I had access to the books mentioned, another book I also came across
after having written these first two books, “Slave species of god” by Michael Tellinger entails the history of man from the perspective of Zachariah Sitchen and many other researchers based on the Sumerian tablets, compiled plus minus six thousand years ago by that very interesting nations scribes. Some of the content in Slave species have very interesting connotations in relation to that which Lawry and also Lomas and Knight are writing about, and all of these books have statements and ideas which explain or confirm some of the history and incidents we find in the Bible, mostly things we, when reading the Bible cannot ‘understand’ and is told to us by the clergy as that which only God know or understand and we should just accept. As we continue I will quote and explain some of the mysteries of God. This is the story told to Lomas by Dr Tim Wallace-Murphy: Somewhere in the mid nineties this descendant of Hugues de Payen (de Payen was verified, born in 1070 and was indeed a templar) walked up to Dr Tim’s after a lecture in London, the following were told to Dr Tim; Apparently this man felt it important to relay this information to Dr Tim due to the fact that Tim was a researcher of the Knights Templar, and regarded it necessary that Tim should have some insight into the matter. According to this man at the times before Jesus was born and also in his time the priests ran two schools, one for boys and one for girls. The priests were known by titles which were the names of angels, such as Michael, Mazaldek and Gabriel, apparently this was the way in which they preserved the pure lines from Levi and David. The girls were from the line of Moses through David etc, the boys chosen to become priests were from the line of Levi. Mary were brought up in such a church as she was from the line of David, when she was of age a priest who carried the title Gabriel impregnated her and she was then married off to Joseph, a much older man, of respectable stature, but allowed to marry in order to carry on the tradition. He went on to explain how James the brother of Jesus was more important than Jesus, explaining the crucifixion which did not cause a major outcry at the time, but that James became the pillar of the church, and when he died the whole
city rose up in revolution, starting the terrible Jewish war against the Romans, also written about by Josephus in plus minus 90 AD. This war caused a group called Rex Deus to form which later became the Knights Templar, at the start of the war they fled Jerusalem and spread all over Europe, this is on pages 101 to 103 of the book ‘The Second Messiah’. Something else mentioned in another part of this book was this: From page 8 to page 10 two descriptions of how James the brother of Jesus died, apparently James was called James the ‘just’. One description is from chapter 66 to 70 of the Clementine Recognitions by Josephus; apparently James was busy with a lecture in the temple of Herod with the famous priests Gamaliel and Caiaphas asking him questions about Jesus, his answers were so pleasing to these two ‘famous’ priests that the audience applauded, then suddenly a commotion started at the end of which James were lying critically injured at the bottom of a flight of stairs, according to some historians Paul the apostle was responsible for this, he fled to Europe after this. Another version by Eusebius seems to be more acceptable to the writers Lomas and Knight, (remember they are both Freemasons) that version states the following; apparently James were asked about the meaning of the twin pillar paradigm (this paradigm is like this; the pillars are called Boaz and Jachin they used to stand at the entrance to the inner sanction of the Yahweh’s temple and were representative of the kingly and priestly Messiahs of Israel, Salvation could only be achieved if these pillars were there, and they could only be there if Israel was a free nation, at that stage they were ruled by the Romans). According to Eusebius James refused to answer the question and it was then that the commotion started which ended with James being dead at the bottom of the stairs due to a blow too the head. On page 12 of their book they mention that some scholars believe that Paul died by the hands of some ‘zealots’ due to his part in the killing of James. These two also stated that the religion as we know it was mostly compiled by Paul and done through his own distorted imagination, apparently James was not happy about the manner Paul interpreted the life of Jesus, and were planning to change it.
Another interesting statement are the names of God, they mention Yahweh, Amon-Re and then Marduk, and Allah, the name the Muslim community use. The name Marduk however also appear in the Sumerian Tablets and in the book ‘Slave species of god’ and in some of the books written by Zachariah Sitchen. According to the Sumerian tablets Marduk was the son of Enki one of the two sons of Anu, king of the planet Nibiru. Enki had a brother Enlil who according to that history was the main politician and strategist here on earth also known as Yahweh the supreme god. Apparently we are the brainchildren of Enki a scientist, presumably he cloned Homo sapiens from Homo erectus, and themselves, but that is for another day. Marduk, the son of Enki, had the same ambition his uncle Enlil had, and plus minus 15 thousand years ago he started planning to take over from Enlil alias Yahweh. In the books of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers we find that Yahweh wanted the people to sacrifice animals on the altars he told them to build. Then suddenly in the book of Isaiah, plus minus 4 thousand years later, and plus minus eight hundred BC, he suddenly asks in Isaiah chapter 1 verse 12, who told the people to offer the animals, he loathed the smell of the blood. The freemasons want us to believe that all the names attributed to God means one supreme God, the Sumerian tablets state that Marduk indeed did take over from Enlil alias Yahweh and in Isaiah we find some proof that he probably did, the bible wants us to believe the same as the freemasons, but the one man who stand between that ‘truth’ and another ‘truth’ was Jesus. Why was he killed, why was Caiaphas, the man who planned his demise in John chapter 11 verses 45 to 53 so taken in by James the ‘just’, why did Paul apparently organized or kill James himself, why was Paul killed by ’zealots’ for his part in the death of James? The reason for that can be found in John chapter 8 to chapter 10, this man Jesus were probably brought up to become the next “high priest of Rex Deus who it seems are today called the Freemasons, what really happened on the mountain when Jesus was told by the
“Devil/Satan” to kneel before him, and if he did the whole world would be his, was it the Devil, or was it Marduk, we might never know, but we can ask questions and form our own opinions. In the book of John Jesus stated that we, this world have been worshipping a devil since the beginning, he also emphasized it in chapter 10 when he gave the parable of the good shepherd, when he referred to those who came before him in this manner; ‘all who came before me, were thieves, liars and murderers, all who came into this world in another way than he did, meaning he was born here, the same as we all. All others were false, how did “God, or Yahweh or Amon-Re, or Marduk got here, we read that a chariot of fire picked up Elijah, we read that God landed in a thing which made a lot of noise and spoke to Ezekiel from a dome on top of this contraption. We read that Jesus said we killed the prophets he sent here in the past like Zechariah, killed on command of the Lord, God, Yahweh, or Marduk, call them what you like. In the book of Acts chapter 7 we read how Stephan accused the people of worshipping the star God Rephan, and carried the tent of the God Molech before they took over the holy land. In Revelations we read about the 144000 thousand chosen priests who will assist in the running of the new kingdom in ‘The Second Messiah by Lomas and Knight we read about the knights templar wearing white, we also read that the masons rituals is in white, the same as the priests in Revelations. Jesus stated that he will only send his angels to collect those who understood his word. The bible and the church try to imply that Jesus was wrong, but a ‘vision’ by a man called John who wrote Revelations is right! We cannot see spirit or the “heaven” Jesus spoke about, but perhaps he was sent by a spiritual leader or creator to come and help us open our eyes and ears, to investigate all things and keep that which is good, in our own time, without interference from God or any religion for that matter, my last book; FSH www.lulu.com/product/paperback/fsh/10919014 together with the previous two is an effort to give a perspective you are entitled to see, use and alter as you please, not two of us see this world through the same eyes, but we do have the freedom to chose what to believe. Happy reading.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.