Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Process Systems Engineering Centre (PROSPECT), Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Baru, Johor, Malaysia
}
Centre for Process Integration and Intensication e CPI2, Research Institute of Chemical and Process Engineering e MUKKI,
Faculty of Information
_
Technology, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10, H-8200 Veszprem,
Hungary
b
h i g h l i g h t s
g r a p h i c a l a b s t r a c t
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 26 December 2012
Accepted 8 March 2013
Available online 21 March 2013
Heat Integration has been a well-established energy conservation strategy in the industry. Total Site Heat
Integration (TSHI) has received growing interest since its inception in the 90s. The methodology has been
used with certain simplications to solve TSHI problems. This paper investigates the main issues that can
inuence the practical implementation of TSHI in the industry. The main aim is to provide an assessment
and possible guidance for future development and extension of the TSHI methodology from the industrial perspective. Several key issues have been identied as being of vital importance for the industries: design, operation, reliability/availability/maintenance, regulatory/policy and economics. Design
issues to consider include plant layout, pressure drop, etc. For operation, issues such as startup and
shutdown need to be considered. Reliability, availability and maintenance (RAM) are important as they
directly affect the production. Relevant government policy and incentives are also important when
considering the options for TSHI. Finally, a TSHI system needs to be economically viable. This paper
highlights the key issues to be considered for a successful implementation of TSHI. The impacts of these
issues on TS integration are summarised in a matrix, which forms a basis for an improved and closer-toreal-life implementation of the TSHI methodology.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Total Site Heat Integration
Key issues
Industrial implementation
Minimum energy targets
Design
1. Introduction
Rising fuel cost, depletion of fossil fuel reserves and threat of
global warming have encouraged industries to maximise heat recovery via Heat Integration as one of the effective strategies to
18
cooperate with each other. A recent study [5] proposed the integration of processes below ambient temperature. However, due to
the condentiality issues, only a limited number of implementations have been released for publication. TSHI is a tool used to set
targets for heat recovery on a Total Site. The Total Site Proles (TSP)
is constructed from the Grand Composite Curves (GCC) of individual processes [1]. Heat recovery can either be direct between processes or indirect via an intermediate medium such as steam. Direct
heat transfer is not always acceptable due to distances between
processes and operational issue. Indirect heat recovery offers
operational exibility but there is a penalty due to reduced temperature driving forces. With indirect heat recovery, the number of
utility temperature levels set the utility targets. More utility levels
result in higher heat recovery however the heat recovered has to be
weighed against the required capital cost [6]. The utility targets
obtained can be used as the basis for the Central Utilities System
(CUS) in a grassroots design or to identify energy saving opportunities in a retrot project. Those heating and cooling duties that are
excluded from TSHI for e.g. due to process reasons, are serviced by
local utilities at individual processes.
The TS methodology, like many engineering approaches, has
been solving models with certain simplications. Only stream
temperatures and average heat capacities have been taken into
account while other issues have yet to be considered in detail. In
real life, these simplications may steer the TSHI project towards
sub-optimal and even non-realistic solutions that can be difcult to
rectify at the later stage of the project implementation. The drivers
for TSHI projects are energy saving and reduced emissions. The
investment required has its associated risks e whether the capital
cost sanctioned will deliver the project and if the expected savings
can be achieved. An adequate TSHI design denition will reduce the
uncertainty in cost estimate, potential for cost overrun due to
design change and improve condence in the expected saving.
Therefore issues other than temperature and heat capacities that
have impact on the TSHI solution should be considered as far as
possible, during the early stages of the process development. This
work aims to investigate the main issues that can support the
practical implementation of TSHI in real-life projects. The main
target is to provide a direction for future extension of TSHI methodology from the industrial perspective.
2. Issues to be considered for Total Site Heat Integration
To arrive at an optimal design, Heat Integration (HI) opportunities are evaluated in the context of wider issues in addition to
stream temperatures and heat capacities. These issues often cannot
be easily quantied like temperatures and heat capacities, but
nevertheless their impacts on TSHI solution in terms of safety,
operability, economics and environment cannot be ignored. It has
always been a question during which phase should these issues be
considered. When too many of these factors are considered upfront,
it could make the TSHI problem too complicated to study and
evaluate. On the other hand, leaving out these issues, at best, may
result in less than cost-effective, and at worst, infeasible design for
implementation. Several key issues have been identied as
important for the industries: design, operations, reliability, availability and maintenance (RAM), regulatory/policy and economic
issues.
2.1. Design
Beyond the heat capacity and temperature, various design issues
can strongly inuence the individual plant design. Interactions
between processes add further complexities to the TSHI analysis.
The main issues to be considered are as follows:
19
2.2. Operations
Operability is a crucial aspect of Heat Integration. Though this is
well recognised, it remains an area of research on how to effectively
address operability issue in the TSHI.
(a) Different operating scenarios e HI has to be exible enough to
allow for the different operating scenarios, e.g. different feed
stock compositions, anticipated. The capacities of the heat recovery equipment and utility systems have to cater for the
worst case scenarios. The impacts of the variations of individual units have to be considered for Total Site and not just the
units alone.
(b) Startup and shutdown e HI has to cater for startup and shutdown of a process or several processes. A contribution on how
to deal with these issues in TSHI has been developed e see e.g.
work presented by Liew et al. [21]. Startup heaters and coolers
have to be provided in parallel to the heat exchangers to allow
for startup and shutdown of processes. The cost of these exchangers has to be added to economic considerations. The
utilities required for startup and shutdown have also to be
included in the balance.
(c) Variation in operating conditions e Long term variations in
operating conditions are such as those due to fouling heat
exchanger (HE) surfaces or exhausted catalysts. A reactor using
catalyst may operate at different conditions with a fresh catalyst
compared to when the catalyst is near to exhaustion. In fouling
services such as renery crude preheating, stream temperature
will vary as the heat exchanger performance declines due to
fouling. These heat exchangers have to be routinely cleaned to
remove the fouling. The cleaning cycle depends on the operating conditions (temperature, pressure, ow speed), uid
characteristics, the HE type and construction. These factors can
be inuenced by TSHI and for this reason the impacts should be
considered when suggestions for modications are made. Short
term uctuations due to process upset are not crucial as the
control system when properly designed can cope with it and
return the process to normal operations quick enough.
(d) Turndown requirements e Some processes may at times operate
at turndown conditions, for e.g. due to reduced demand for its
products. To cater for the varying ow rates, parallel units, e.g.
2 50% or 3 33.3% conguration for heat exchangers may be
used to cater for the design ow ranges. This especially so with
viscous uids in order to maintain the minimum velocity
needed for effective heat transfer and at times to reduce fouling
potential.
(e) Controllability e The impact of heat integration on process
controllability has to be considered. For example, typical renery crude preheating involved an equal 50% stream split. A
simple way of control is to use manual valves and symmetrical
piping for ow splitting as shown in Fig. 1(a). A more sophisticated way is to use ow cascaded with temperature control
loops, see Fig. 1(b). The downside of the sophisticated method
is the increased pressure losses across the control valves. The
sophisticated control loops along with its hardware have
considerable cost implications. If risk of production loss is high,
decision may be taken to exclude a stream from HI even though
TSHI has identied the opportunity. For e.g. in a distillation
column where the product purity is very sensitive to the column bottom temperature, a heating medium is preferred over
a hot process stream for the reboiler. If a process stream is used
instead, there is a chance for column upset as any upset in the
process stream would affect the column operations. Process
upsets translate directly to production losses as it takes time for
the production to recover from upsets to normal.
20
(f) Operational hazards e Any hazards arising from the Heat Integration have to be identied via a hazard and operability study,
HAZOP. Necessary mitigation and control measures have to be
put in place as required where these have safety implications.
Inherent safety design takes away reliance on instrumentation
or operators action to arrest an unsafe situation hence is superior over any operational measures.
Consideration of operational issues is essential to arrive at a
realistic target that can be used as the basis for CUS in a grassroots
design or to identify energy saving opportunities in a retrot
project. The basis for design has to be as good as practicable to avoid
design changes (which can be costly and can cause project delay)
during the implementation stage.
21
(d) Design change e Cost of design change is signicant. It can increase up to several folds with each step of the life cycle, from
conceptual design, detailed design, construction to operation.
Therefore, there is big savings incentive to have an excellent
basic design during the conceptual stage to eliminate any
changes later [34].
(e) Uncertainties e Good cost data are not always available. For
energy, forecasted future cost is used and this always has its
associated uncertainties. The uncertainties in economic evaluated need to be addressed and sensitivity analysis carried out
(especially when future cost is involved).
(f) Policy and regulations e The economic assessment should also
consider and capitalise on the nancial incentives, any
favourable tax treatment, any penalty, subsidies and loans
made available for energy saving or energy efciency
improvement projects as these are equally applicable to Total
Site as with individual process.
A TSHI solution is optimal at the time of evaluation based on the
information available. Energy cost changes with time and often is
always on the increase. Therefore it will be prudent to revisit design
and economic analysis to explore opportunities for improving energy efciency. The cost model may be recalibrated with the actual
result after the implementation of the project.
3. Evaluation of the impacts on TSHI solutions
The main issues assessed for a successful implementation of
TSHI are summarised in a matrix presented in Fig. 2. This matrix
serves as a checklist as well as the basis for an improved, and closer
to real life TSHI methodology. The objective is to capture essential
issues in the proposed solutions for project decision e to implement or not. An expanded TSHI owchart to include consideration
of these issues is shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 2. Matrix showing the main issues on Total Site Heat Integration solution.
22
Temperature
Analysis /
Conceptual
Design
Heat
capacities
Contamination
risk
Varying
operating
conditions
Fluid
characteristics
Layout
Minimum
Energy
Target
Undesired
phase change
Turndown
Utility levels
Operating
Scenarios
Regulatory
/Policy
Controllability
Pressure
Detailed
Design
TSHI
options for
economic
evaluation
Startup &
shutdown
Usage of low
grade heat
Reliability,
Availability &
Maintenance
Cogeneration
potential
Operational
hazards
CUSa
A
B
C
D
E
F
Distance from x
Horizontal
(m)
Vertical
(m)
0
200
500
1000
150
750
2250
0
500
500
500
700
700
1000
Location
Pressureb
(barg)
x
1
2
3
4
5
6
5.25
5.05
4.75
4.25
5.10
4.50
3.00
Location
Pressureb
(barg)
a
b
c
d
e
f
4.55
4.25
3.75
4.40
3.80
2.00
Excluding
A,
A,
A,
A,
e
F
C, F
C, E, F
B,
B,
B,
B,
C, D, E, F
C, D, E
D, E
D
Header
pressurea (barg)
Steam
temperatureb ( C)
5.25
3.50
3.45
2.85
177
154
154
146
a
Pressure required at header to supply steam at a minimum pressure of 2.00 barg
to the furthest consumer.
b
Corresponding saturated steam temperature at the header pressure.
23
24
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the nancial supports
from the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Research University
Grant under Vote No. Q.J130000.2544.03H44 and the EC FP7
project ENER/FP7/296003/EFENIS Efcient Energy Integrated
Solutions for Manufacturing Industries e EFENIS. The support from
the Hungarian project Trsadalmi Megjuls Operatv Program
TMOP e 4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0072 e Design and optimisation of modernisation and efcient operation of energy supply and
utilisation systems using renewable energy sources and ICTs
signicantly contributed to the completion of this analysis.
Nomenclature
Capex
CUS
ETS
EU
GHG
HAZOP
HE
HI
HP
HT
HTE
LP
MP
Opex
RAM
TS
TSHI
Capital expenditure
Central Utilities System
Greenhouse gas emissions cap-and-trade schemes
European Union
Greenhouse gases
Hazards & operability study
Heat exchanger
Heat Integration
High pressure, barg
Heat transfer
Heat transfer enhancements
Low pressure, barg
Medium pressure, barg
Operating expenditure
Reliability, availability and maintenance
Total Site
Total Site Heat Integration
References
[1] J. Klemes, V.R. Dhole, K. Raissi, S.J. Perry, L. Puigjaner, Targeting and design
methodology for reduction of fuel, power and CO2 on total sites, Applied
Thermal Engineering 17 (8e10) (1997) 993e1003.
[2] K. Matsuda, Y. Hirochi, H. Tatsumi, T. Shire, Applying heat integration total
site based pinch technology to a large industrial area in Japan to further
improve performance of highly efcient process plant, Energy 34 (2009)
1687e1692.
[3] K. Matsuda, S. Tanaka, M. Endou, T. IIyoshi, Energy saving study on a large
steel plant by total site based pinch technology, Applied Thermal Engineering
43 (2012) 14e19.
[4] R. Hackl, A. Andersson, S. Harvey, Targeting for energy efciency and
improved energy collaboration between different companies using total site
analysis (TSA), Energy 36 (8) (2012) 4609e4615.
[5] R. Hackl, S. Harvey, Total site analysis (TSA) and exergy analysis for shaft work
and associated steam and electricity savings in low temperature processes in
industrial clusters, Chemical Engineering Transactions 29 (2012) 73e78.
[6] J. Klemes, F. Friedler, I. Bulatov, P. Varbanov, Sustainability in the Process
Industry e Integration and Optimization, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 2010.
[7] R.K. Sinnot, Chemical Engineering Design, in: Coulson & Richardsons Chemical Engineering, fourth ed., vol. 6, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford,
UK, 2005. pp. 892e906.
[8] J.J. Klemes, P.S. Varbanov, Implementation and pitfalls of process integration,
Chemical Engineering Transactions 21 (2010) 1369e1374.
[9] X.X. Zhu, M. Zanr, J.J. Klemes, Heat transfer enhancement for heat exchanger
network retrot, Heat Transfer Engineering 21 (2000) 7e18.
25
[10] A. Piacentino, Thermal analysis and new insights to support decision making
in retrot and relaxation of heat exchanger networks, Applied Thermal Engineering 31 (16) (2011) 3479e3499.
[11] X. Feng, J. Pu, J. Yang, K.H. Chu, Energy recovery in petrochemical
complexes through heat integration retrot analysis, Applied Energy 88 (5)
(2011) 1965e1982.
[12] M.J. Atkins, M.R.W. Walmsley, J.R. Neale, Application of heat recovery loops
for improved process integration between individual plants at a large diary
factory, Chemical Engineering Transaction 25 (2011) 183e188.
[13] S.G. Hall, S. Ahmad, R. Smith, Capital cost targets for heat exchanger networks
comprising mixed materials of construction, pressure ratings and exchanger
types, Computers and Chemical Engineering. 14 (3) (1990) 319e335.
[14] S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Varghese, V. Bansal, Targeting for cogeneration potential
through total site integration, Applied Thermal Engineering 30 (1) (2010) 6e14.
[15] W.F. Kenny, Energy Conservation in Process Industries, Academic Press,
Orlando, USA, 1984.
[16] V.R. Dhole, B. Linnhoff, Total site targets for fuel, co-generation, emissions, and
cooling, Computers and Chemical Engineering 17 (Suppl. 1) (1993) S101eS109.
[17] A. Ghannadzadeh, S. Perry, R. Smith, Cogeneration targeting for site utility
systems, Applied Thermal Engineering 43 (0) (2012) 60e66.
[18] M.H. Khoshgoftar Manesh, S.K. Abadi, M. Amidpour, M.H. Hamedi, A new
targeting method for estimation of cogeneration potential and total annualized cost in process industries, Chemical Engineering Research and Design
(2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2012.12.002.
[19] Wien Energie Group e Fernwrme Wien, District Heating & Cooling in
Vienna e The Vienna Model (2009). <www.copenhagenenergysummit.
org/applications/Vienna,%20Austria-District%20Energy%20Climate%20Award.
pdf> (accessed 14.12.12).
[20] K. Matsuda, D. Kurosaki, D. Hayashi, K. Aoyama, Industrial heat pump study
using pinch technology for large scale petrochemical site, Chemical Engineering Transactions 29 (2012) 67e72.
[21] P.Y. Liew, S.R. Wan Alwi, P.S. Varbanov, Z.A. Manan, J.J. Klemes, A numerical
technique for total site sensitivity analysis, Applied Thermal Engineering. 40
(2012) 397e408.
[22] K.Y. Cheung, C.W. Hui, Total-site scheduling for better energy utilization,
Journal of Cleaner Production 12 (2) (2004) 171e184.
[23] K. Hirata, H. Sakamoto, L. OYoung, K.Y. Cheung, C.W. Hui, Multi-site utility
integrationdan industrial case study, Computers and Chemical Engineering
28 (1e2) (2004) 139e148.
[24] American Petroleum Institute, Recommended Practice for Analysis, Design,
Installation, and Testing of Basic Surface Safety Systems for Offshore Production Platforms API RP 14C, seventh ed., API Publishing Services, Washington, USA, 2001.
[25] O. Aguilar, J.K. Kim, S. Perry, R. Smith, Availability and reliability considerations in the design and optimisation of exible utility systems, Chemical
Engineering Science 63 (14) (2008) 3569e3584.
[26] R. Smith, Q. Yin, Z. Lin, X. Zheng, Reliability issues in the design and operation of
process utility systems, Chemical Engineering Transactions 22 (2011) 75e80.
[27] European Union, Council Directive 92/42/EEC e efciency requirements for
new hot-water boilers red with liquid or gaseous fuels. <eur-lex.europa.eu/
LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uriCELEX:31992L0042:en:NOT> (accessed on 2102-2013)
[28] European Union, Directive 2010/31/EU e energy performance of buildings.
<eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uriOJ:L:2010:153:0013:
0035:EN:PDF> (accessed 21.02.13)
[29] European Union, Directory of European Union Legislation in Force e energy.
<eur-lex.europa.eu/en/legis/latest/index.htm> (accessed 15.02.13).
[30] K. Tanaka, Review of policies and measures for energy efciency in industry
sector, Energy Policy 39 (10) (2011) 6532e6550.
[31] Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water, Malaysia, National Energy
Policy. <www.kettha.gov.my/en> (accessed 04.10.12).
[32] GreenTech Malaysia, National Energy Policy, Incentives and Regulations.
<www.greentechmalaysia.my/> (accessed 04.10.12).
[33] A. Nemet, J.J. Klemes, Z. Kravanja, Minimisation of a heat exchanger networks
cost over its lifetime, Energy 45 (1) (2012) 264e276.
[34] E.P. DeGarmo, W.G. Sullivan, J.A. Bontadell, E.M. Wicks, Engineering Economy,
tenth ed., Prentice-Hall International Inc., New Jersey, USA, 1997. pp. 21e62.
[35] R. Smith, Chemical Process Design and Integration, John Wiley & Son,
Chichester, UK, 2005.
[36] S. Perry, J. Klemes, I. Bulatov, Integrating waste and renewable energy to
reduce the carbon footprint of locally integrated energy sectors, Energy 33
(10) (2008) 1489e1497.