32 views

Uploaded by Marco Jones

Many textbooks dealing with general relativity do not demonstrate the
derivation of forces in enough detail. The analyses presented herein demonstrate
straightforward methods for computing forces by way of general relativity. Covariant
divergence of the stress-energy-momentum tensor is used to derive a general expression
of the force experienced by an observer in general coordinates. The general force is then
applied to the local co-moving coordinate system of a uniformly accelerating observer,
leading to an expression of the inertial force experienced by the observer. Next,
applying the general force in Schwarzschild coordinates is shown to lead to familiar
expressions of the gravitational force. As a more complex demonstration, the general
force is applied to an observer in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates near a rotating, Kerr
black hole. It is then shown that when the angular momentum of the black hole goes
to zero, the force on the observer reduces to the force on an observer held stationary in
Schwarzschild coordinates. As a nal consideration, the force on an observer moving
in rotating coordinates is derived. Expressing the force in terms of Christoel symbols
in rotating coordinates leads to familiar expressions of the centrifugal and Coriolis
forces on the observer. It is envisioned that the techniques presented herein will be
most useful to graduate level students, as well as those undergraduate students having
experience with general relativity and tensor analysis.

save

You are on page 1of 14

Charles T. Ridgely

Thienes Engineering, Inc., La Mirada, CA 90638

E-mail: charles@ridgely.ws

Abstract. Many textbooks dealing with general relativity do not demonstrate the

derivation of forces in enough detail. The analyses presented herein demonstrate

straightforward methods for computing forces by way of general relativity. Covariant

divergence of the stress-energy-momentum tensor is used to derive a general expression

of the force experienced by an observer in general coordinates. The general force is then

applied to the local co-moving coordinate system of a uniformly accelerating observer,

leading to an expression of the inertial force experienced by the observer. Next,

applying the general force in Schwarzschild coordinates is shown to lead to familiar

expressions of the gravitational force. As a more complex demonstration, the general

force is applied to an observer in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates near a rotating, Kerr

black hole. It is then shown that when the angular momentum of the black hole goes

to zero, the force on the observer reduces to the force on an observer held stationary in

Schwarzschild coordinates. As a final consideration, the force on an observer moving

in rotating coordinates is derived. Expressing the force in terms of Christoffel symbols

in rotating coordinates leads to familiar expressions of the centrifugal and Coriolis

forces on the observer. It is envisioned that the techniques presented herein will be

most useful to graduate level students, as well as those undergraduate students having

experience with general relativity and tensor analysis.

PACS numbers: 04.20.Cv, 04.20.Gz, 02.40.-k, 03.30.+p

**Keywords: General relativity, force, inertia, energy, acceleration, gravitation, rotation,
**

Schwarzschild, Newton, lapse function, conservation, stress-energy, energy-momentum,

general coordinates, Boyer-Lindquist, Kerr, centrifugal force, Coriolis force

While many texts touch on the subject of forces to varying degrees [1][3]. as well as providing students with some of the tools necessary for computing forces on their own. The general force is applied to the Boyer-Lindquist coordinate system for an observer stationed outside a rotating. gravitational forces are treated as manifestations of space-time geometry [1]-[9]. The familiar Newtonian expression of the force is retrieved upon specializing to the case of a weakly gravitating source. it is envisioned that the analyses presented in the following sections will be useful in the teaching of general relativity. what is often times lacking is a clear demonstration of how geometric objects such as the metric tensor and Christoffel symbols can be used to derive inertial and gravitational vector forces. In the next section. The coordinate systems discussed in section 3 are simple. Covariant divergence of the stress-energy-momentum tensor is used to derive a general expression of the force experienced by the observer.Forces in General Relativity 2 1. Once all the components of the force are obtained. The analyses presented herein demonstrate straightforward methods for computing forces by way of general relativity. or due to the observer being stationed near a large gravitational source. An alternative form of the general force is then derived by incorporating a lapse function. and the derivation is limited to key results. which is well known to express the quantity of proper time that elapses per unit of coordinate time [10]. It is pointed out that the coordinate system may be due to the observer’s own acceleration. Considering that this subject is covered only lightly in many textbooks. an observer residing in arbitrary coordinates is used to demonstrate the relationship between forces and space-time geometry. Kerr black hole. Introduction Essentially all textbooks dealing with general relativity provide students with a thorough understanding of the geometric aspects of the theory. In section 4. as well as general tensor analysis techniques. Next. Specializing to the case of weak acceleration produces an expression of the force equivalent to that obtainable by way of Newton’s second law of motion. it is demonstrated that the general force is not limited solely to simple coordinate systems. Section 3 demonstrates the use of the general force and lapse function in familiar coordinate systems. the force . and consequently the derivations of the force are straightforward. Since Boyer-Lindquist coordinates are so algebraically involved. Using the general force and the components of the metric tensor in the accelerating system leads quite simply to an expression of the inertial force experienced by the accelerating observer. An expression of the lapse function for an observer held stationary near a large gravitational source is derived. the general force is tackled one component at a time. Using the Schwarzschild lapse function with the general force of section 2 leads to a general relativistic expression of the gravitational force [10]. The section begins with a discussion of the local co-moving coordinate system of a uniformly accelerating observer. Schwarzschild coordinates are considered. An important point to recognize is that according to general relativity. and thereby help them gain a deeper understanding of general relativity.

such as an elevator car or telephone booth. a form of the general force expressed in terms of Christoffel symbols is used for an observer moving in rotating coordinates. Further simplification of the force leads to familiar expressions of the centrifugal and Coriolis forces on the observer. . Expressing the Christoffel symbols in rotating coordinates leads to an expression of the force in terms of the total energy and momentum associated with the observer. let us consider the force on the observer due to general coordinates in the frame of the observer. the vessel may be accelerating uniformly in Minkowski space-time under the action of an external force. 3).Forces in General Relativity 3 on the observer is stated in totality. and the semi-colon (. Greek indices are carried over the values (0. Let us derive the force by way of (1) with the understanding that T µν includes all forms of energy and momentum. In the appendix. the local reference frame of the observer will appear to be characterized by the effects of acceleration. particles such as the above-mentioned observer move along geodesics. associated with the observer. which are the straightest possible paths in space-time. The appendix closes with a simple derivation of the gradient operator in Schwarzschild coordinates.) denotes covariant differentiation. With this model in mind. 2. An expression of the gradient operator is then derived for the special case in which the metric tensor is diagonal. the force on the observer in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates reduces to the expression of the force on an observer held stationary in Schwarzschild coordinates. the observer might conclude that the force is due to acceleration of the vessel or to gravitation. the gradient operator is expressed in general coordinates. In section 5. The force is such that the observer possesses weight and can stand at one end of the vessel. familiar to essentially all relativity textbooks.ν = 0 (1) where T µν is the stress-energy-momentum tensor of the observer. According to general relativity. in the absence of any external forces. the gradient operator is shown to assume a form familiar to most students by way of vector analysis. On the other hand. On one hand. and assuming the vessel is relatively small. Section 4 closes with a demonstration that when the angular momentum of the source is put equal to zero. In either case. Another way in which the force can be derived is by use of the divergence of the stress-energy-momentum tensor. 1. expressed in covariant form as T µν. Force in general coordinates Let us consider an observer experiencing a force within an enclosed vessel. as well as any internal stress. Ignoring tidal effects. One approach to deriving the force on the observer is to consider the motion of the observer by use of the geodesic equation. 2. the vessel may be suspended from a tether near a gravitational source. Upon introducing the Lam´e coefficients.

3). Upon substituting (8) into (7). 2 Equation (2) can be simplified by expressing the Christoffel symbol in the second term in the form √ ∂α ( −g) ν Γαν = √ (4) ( −g) where g is the determinant of the metric tensor. Equation (6) can be further simplified by converting the second term into a surface integral by way of Gauss’ law. gives √ ∂ν ( −gT µν ) √ + Γµαν T αν = 0.α − gαν. Substituting (4) into the second term in (2). (5) ( −g) Summing over ν in the left-most term. as well. the stress-energy-momentum tensor of the vessel must be taken into account.ν + gγν. Carrying this out puts (6) in the form I Z 1 d Z µ0 3 T d x + T µi dSi + Γµαν T αν d3 x = 0 (7) c dτ where dSi is an element of the proper. gµν . it will be recognized that since the observer is standing on the floor of the vessel. and thus the vessel exerts a force on the observer. For T(m) the second integral is zero because the observer does not convey energy or momentum across the boundary surface of the observer. Let us express the stress-energy-momentum tensor of the observer-vessel system as µν µν T µν = T(m) + T(v) (8) µν µν where T(m) and T(v) are the stress-energy-momentum tensors of the observer and vessel. Upon applying (7) to the observer. and rearranging a bit. 2.Forces in General Relativity 4 Expanding the covariant derivative in (1) gives ∂ν T µν + Γναν T µα + Γµαν T αν = 0 (2) in which ∂ν denotes partial differentiation with respect to xν . µν respectively. It should also be noted that the Christoffel symbol has been moved outside the right-most integral on the assumption that the gradient of the gravitational potential is roughly uniform across the volume of the observer. boundary surface surrounding the observer. and the Christoffel symbol Γµαν is defined in terms of the metric tensor as 1 (3) Γµαν = g µγ (gαγ. Under these conditions. and Latin indices are taken over the values (1. (7) assumes the form Z I 1 d Z µ0 3 µi αν 3 T(m) d x + T(v) dSi + Γµαν T(m) d x=0 (9) c dτ .γ ) . and then integrating over the proper volume of the observer leads to √ Z Z Z ∂i ( −gT µi ) 3 1 dT µ0 3 √ d x+ d x + Γµαν T αν d3 x = 0 (6) c dτ ( −g) in which τ is proper time. it is straightforward to see that for T(v) the first and third integrals are zero because the vessel is outside the boundary surface µν of the observer. and the time derivative has been moved outside the left-most integral because the volume of the observer is independent of time.

with the exception that (10) is expressed in terms of the stress-energy-momentum tensor T αν of the observer and includes the external force F µ . −). using (3) in (10) puts the force in the simplified form [11] Z 1 µj µ (11) F = g g00. −. puts the general force on the observer in the form 1 F = E∇ ln(g00 )− 2 . Expressing (9) in terms of forces. and thus T(m) = 0 in (9) and f µ = 0 in (10). and then performing the integration over the volume of the observer. when the metric tensor is independent of coordinate time. including those due to internal stresses and thermodynamic phenomena [12]-[14]. For the special case in which the observer remains stationary within the coordinate µ0 system. An expression equivalent to (12) can be obtained by noticing that the gradient operator can be expressed in general coordinates as [15] ∇ → −gi g ij ∂j (13) where the minus sign is included due to our choice of sign convention. and rearranging a bit. (+. leads to [1] f µ + Γµαν Z T αν d3 x = −F µ (10) αν where the subscript on T(m) has been dropped for brevity. −. Equation (10) is equivalent to the geodesic equation.Forces in General Relativity 5 The left-most term in (9) can be expressed as a force f µ on the observer due to the floor of the vessel and the coordinate system in the frame of the observer. the observer’s proper time can be related to coordinate time by [10] g00 = dτ dt !2 (15) in which dτ is an interval of proper time. (14) As a further simplification.j T 00 d3 x. Moreover. and E is the total energy of the observer. and dt is an interval of coordinate time. The function dτ /dt is known in the literature as a “lapse function. Carrying this out and expressing the force as a vector leads to 1 F = Eg ij ∂j (ln(g00 )) gi (12) 2 in which gi is a general basis vector pointing in the i−coordinate direction. The second term is an inward-directed. 2 The right-hand term can be further simplified by putting T 00 = ρ(U 0 )2 . It should be understood that the energy E encompasses all forms of energy associated with the observer. external force F µ on the boundary surface of the observer by the floor of the vessel. and rearranging a bit. using gµν U µ U ν = c2 .” or “gravitational redshift . Using (13) in (12). the momentum of the observer is zero. and the minus sign on the right-hand side is included to express the force by which the observer acts on the floor of the vessel.

the lapse function is purely relativistic in origin and is easily applicable to cases of acceleration. Moreover. The force experienced by the accelerating observer can be determined by use of either (12) or (16). (18) can be expressed equivalently as a · x −1 F = −ma 1 + 2 (19) c in which the expression E = mc2 has been used. Substituting (17a) into (12) leads to !−1 aj x j Eaj g ij F= 1 + ei (18) c2 c2 √ in which ei = gi −g ii is a basis vector of unit length pointing in the i−coordinate direction. the components of the metric tensor can be expressed as [16. dt/dτ . the best way to see the usefulness of (12) and (16) is to go ahead and consider specific coordinate systems. dτ /dt. In the co-moving frame of the accelerating observer. Referring specifically to (16).” which expresses the quantity of proper time that elapses per unit of coordinate time [10]. Using (17b). and thus we can put ai = −δ ij aj . It should be understood that (12) and (16) are equivalent. similar to the gravitational field potential. and xj is the distance in flat space-time over which the acceleration takes place.Forces in General Relativity 6 factor. the term “lapse function” is used casually in reference to dτ /dt as well as its inverse. upon noting that the acceleration vector of the observer is a = ai ei . Suppose the vessel is accelerating uniformly in Minkowski space-time due to an external force. Perhaps. For the sake of simplicity. it is interesting to note that the force is solely dependent upon the total proper energy E of the observer and the gradient of the lapse function [10]. however. it is easy to see that g ij = −δ ij . (19) reduces to F ≈ −ma (20) . as well as gravitation. The form of (16) clearly suggests that the lapse function behaves as a scalar potential. Unlike φ. Substituting (15) into (14) and simplifying leads to dτ F=E dt ! dt ∇ dτ ! . Familiar coordinate systems Let us return to the observer in the vessel mentioned in the previous section. (16) Equations (12) and (16) express the apparent weight of the observer acting on the floor of the vessel due to the general coordinate system. or equivalently by use of the lapse function. φ [10]. [12]-[14]. 17] g00 aj x j = 1+ 2 c !2 (17a) gij = −δij (17b) in which aj is the proper acceleration. and that a · x = aj xj . It is straightforward to see that when a · x << c2 . 3. Forces can be expressed in terms of g00 .

As shown in the appendix. (13) can be used to express the gradient operator in Schwarzschild coordinates. expressing (13) in Schwarzschild coordinates puts the gradient operator in the form 2φ ∇→ 1+ 2 c !1/2 er ∂ eθ ∂ eϕ ∂ + + . ∂r r ∂θ r sin θ ∂ϕ (24) Using (24) in (23).Forces in General Relativity 7 which is equivalent to the force obtainable by way of Newton’s second law of motion. The line element in Schwarzschild coordinates can be expressed as ! 2 ds = c 2 2φ 2φ 1 + 2 dt2 − 1 + 2 c c !−1 dr2 − r2 dθ2 − r2 sin2 θdϕ2 (21) in which φ is the field potential due to the gravitational source. giving the observer a sense of possessing weight. (25) r cr Equation (25) is the weight of the observer acting on the floor of the vessel. and using (15). Equation (20) is the force by which the observer acts on the floor of the vessel. it is straightforward to see that the lapse function in Schwarzschild coordinates is dτ 2φ = 1+ 2 dt c !1 2 . The observer has weight and can stand at the end of the vessel nearest the source. By inspection of (21). and noting that outside the source the field potential is φ = −GM/r. including sources of energy due to internal stresses and any thermodynamic phenomena that may be present [12]-[14]. It should be noted that the inertial mass m appearing in (19) and (20) is proportional to the total energy E associated with the observer. leads to [10] 1 GM m 2GM − 2 F=− 2 1− 2 er . Let us use (16) to determine the force on the observer. (23) As a further simplification. limiting (23) and (25) to first order in φ puts the observer’s weight in the more familiar form GM m F ≈ −m∇φ = − 2 er . . (22) Substituting (22) into (16) and using E = mc2 to relate the gravitational mass of the observer to the total energy E associated with the observer leads to 2φ F = −m 1 + 2 c !−1 ∇φ. When the source is weakly gravitating. Suppose the vessel containing the observer is suspended from a tether near a large. the gravitational mass m in (26) is proportional to the total energy E of the observer. spherically symmetric gravitational source of mass M . (26) r As mentioned above. Another interesting case is the Schwarzschild coordinate system. despite the presence of the force on the accelerating observer. An interesting aspect of the examples above is that the uniformly accelerating coordinate system is flat.

. there is essentially no difference between gravitational and inertial forces. the force on the orbiting observer can indeed be determined by way of either (12) or (16). and the computation of the forces straightforward. whereas in the case of uniform acceleration. In the Schwarzschild geometry. applicable to the geometry near a rotating. both ultimately hinge on g00 . What the accelerating and Schwarzschild coordinate systems have in common is that in each case g00 is differentiable. Thus. For the interested reader. a detailed treatment of rotating black holes is given by K. Now. but is dragged along in the ϕ−direction. we simply point out that the orbiting observer remains at rest relative to 3-dimensional space so long as the observer maintains fixed r and θ. et al [10]. and Σ2 are respectively given as ∆ = r2 + a2 − 2M r (28a) ρ2 = r2 + a2 cos2 θ (28b) Σ2 = r2 + a2 2 − a2 ∆ sin2 θ (28c) in which a = J/M is the angular momentum per unit mass. the observer remains at rest relative to 3-dimensional space. An interesting feature of the Kerr black hole is that all nearby objects are dragged into rotation in the ϕ−direction with an angular velocity dϕ/dt = 2aM r/Σ2 due to the black hole’s rotation. An important point to notice is that we may view 3-dimensional space as being dragged along with the observer by the black hole. Thorne. however. and the angular velocity is precisely dϕ/dt = 2aM r/Σ2 . 4. ρ2 . g00 is differentiable due to space-time curvature. Thus. stationary observers to be orbiting the Kerr black hole. though a particularly useful form for our purposes here is [10] 2 ρ2 Σ2 2aM r ρ2 dt ds = 2 ∆dt2 − dr2 − ρ2 dθ2 − 2 sin2 θ dϕ − Σ ∆ ρ Σ2 2 (27) where the functions ∆. let us consider a more complex coordinate system. The line element in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates can be arranged into many seemingly different forms. For our purposes. even though the observer appears to distant. One may question how (12) and (16) can be used to determine the force on an orbiting observer. Let us consider the force experienced by an observer that maintains fixed r and θ outside the Kerr hole. Boyer-Lindquist coordinates The coordinate systems in the previous section are simple. An interesting coordinate system is Boyer-Lindquist coordinates. Thus. Kerr black hole. it is the motion of the observer that gives rise to a differentiable g00 . and we have temporarily put GM/c2 → M for the sake of simplicity. the Schwarzschild space-time is indeed curved.Forces in General Relativity 8 Unlike the accelerating coordinate system.

and (32c) into (31). we have ∆ ∂ρ2 ∂ 1 g00. (28b). and (28c) with respect to r gives g00. (28b). we may put dr = dθ = 0 and dϕ = (2aM r/Σ2 )dt in (27).1 = − 4 M ρ2 r4 − a4 + 2a2 r2 M ∆ sin2 θ .1 g1 + g 22 g00.Forces in General Relativity 9 Let us determine the force on the observer by using (12). and then performing a lot of algebraic manipulation eventually leads to i 2 h g00. Σ4 (35) (36a) (36b) . and (28c). (30) 2g00 Since working in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates is algebraically involved. Turning now to the second term in (30). Summing over i and j in (12) and retaining only non-zero terms then gives g00 = E 11 g g00. Using (29) and starting with the partial differentiation in the first term on the right-hand side of (30).2 = 2 + ρ2 ∆ . The resulting expression suggests that we then have ρ2 ∆. (32b).2 g2 . it will be noted that (29) is independent of ϕ. For the case of the observer moving as described above. Σ ∂θ ∂θ Σ2 Performing the partial differentiation of (28b) and (28c) with respect to θ gives ∂ρ2 = −2a2 sin θ cos θ ∂θ ∂ ∂θ 1 Σ2 = 2a2 ∆ sin θ cos θ. the r−component of the force simplifies to " Fr = −Gmer M ρ2 (r4 − a4 ) + 2a2 r2 M ∆ sin2 θ √ ρ3 Σ2 ∆ # (34) where we have put M → GM/c2 and have expressed the total gravitational mass of the observer by way of E = mc2 .1 = ∂∆ = 2 (r − M ) ∂r (32a) ∂ρ2 = 2r ∂r (32b) ∂ ∂r 1 Σ2 = i −1 h 2 2 2 2 2 2 4r(r + a ) − 2ra sin θ + 2M a sin θ . (33) Σ √ Upon substituting (33) into (30). (31) 2 2 Σ ∂r Σ ∂r ∂r Σ2 Carrying out the partial differentiation of (28a). it will be easier to work on each component of the force separately. Σ4 (32c) Substituting (32a). we may put F= ∆ ∂ρ2 ∂ 1 ρ2 ∂∆ + + ρ2 ∆ . (29) Σ2 Upon referring back to (28a). and noting that g 11 = −∆/ρ2 and g1 = er ρ/ ∆.

the total force on the observer assumes the form # " M ρ2 (r4 − a4 ) + 2a2 r2 M ∆ sin2 θ √ + . 5. is set equal to zero. As a final consideration. and simplifying a bit. F = −Gmer ρ3 Σ2 ∆ 2M ra2 2 (39) − Gmeθ 3 2 r + a2 sin θ cos θ. (37) Σ4 Then. Let us use (10) to determine the force on an observer moving with a uniform velocity in a coordinate system which rotates with a constant angular velocity ω ~ = ωez . and (28c) respectively gives ∆ → r2 − 2GM/c2 r2 .Forces in General Relativity 10 Substituting (36a) and (36b) into (35). 19] gµν = 1 − (ωr/c)2 ωy/c −ωx/c 0 ωy/c −1 0 0 −ωx/c 0 −1 0 0 0 0 −1 (41a) .. Thus. puts the θ−component of the force in the form g00. leads to 2a2 ∆ 2 2 Σ − ρ ∆ sin θ cos θ. derived directly in Schwarzschild coordinates. it is a worthwhile exercise to verify that (39) reduces to the expected Schwarzschild solution when the angular momentum. Using these limiting expressions in (39) and simplifying a bit leads directly to 1 GM m 2GM − 2 F=− 2 er . substituting (37) into (30). (39) reduces to the expected expression of the force on an observer held stationary in Schwarzschild coordinates. Upon combining (34) and (38). (40) 1− 2 r cr Equation (40) is identical to (25). however.2 = − Fθ = −Gmeθ 2M ra2 2 2 r + a sin θ cos θ ρ3 Σ2 (38) where again we have put M → GM/c2 and used E = mc2 . Putting a → 0 in (28a). a. and using g 22 = −1/ρ2 and g2 = eθ ρ. and Σ2 → r4 . ρ2 → r2 . The metric tensor and inverse metric tensor in rotating coordinates are respectively given by [18. (28b). it is also instructive to see how the force can be derived by way of (10). We are now in a position to state the entire expression of the force acting on the observer. in the limit a → 0. is in agreement with the literature [10]. Rotating coordinates The previous sections have demonstrated the use of (12) and (16) in various coordinate systems. derived on the basis of (12).. ρΣ Equation (39).

and retaining only non-zero terms gives F = − e1 − e2 Γ100 Z Γ200 Z 00 3 T d x+ 00 3 T d x+ 2Γ120 Z 2Γ210 Z 20 3 T d x + . whereas the second and third terms are respective components of the observer’s momentum in the y− and x−coordinate directions. Using this knowledge and also noticing that ω ~ × (~ω × r) = −ω 2 rer . (46) The first term on the right-hand side of (46) clearly is the centrifugal force on the observer. (10) produces results consistent with known theory. Γ120 = −ω/c. in absence of external forces. the force on the observer can be put in the form [15] F= F=− m~ω × (~ω × r) + 2m (~ω × v) (1 − v 02 /c2 ) (45) where v is the velocity of the observer in the rotating system.Forces in General Relativity g µν = 11 1 ωy/c −ωx/c 0 2 2 ωy/c −1 + (ωy/c) −xy(ω/c) 0 2 2 −ωx/c −yx(ω/c) −1 + (ωx/c) 0 0 0 0 −1 (41b) where r2 = x2 + y 2 . The analyses presented in the . 6. and the second term is the Coriolis force. As expected. Substituting (42) into (43). Γ200 = −y(ω/c)2 . and m is the total mass of the observer in the rotating system. Minkowski space-time. Expressing (3) in terms of the components of (41a) and (41b) gives the non-zero Christoffel symbols in the rotating system as Γ100 = −x(ω/c)2 . 10 3 T dx (43) where e1 and e2 are unit basis vectors respectively pointing in the x− and y−coordinate directions. v 0 << c. and r is the radial distance from the origin of the rotating system to the observer. (42) Expressing (10) as a vector. Γ102 = −ω/c. Γ201 = ω/c. and rearranging terms.. v0 = v + ω ~ × r is the total velocity of observer relative to non-rotating.. leads to Z Z Z ω 2 ω rer T 00 d3 x + 2 e1 T 20 d3 x − e2 T 10 d3 x . (45) simplifies to F ≈ −m~ω × (~ω × r) − 2m (~ω × v) . Γ210 = ω/c. (44) c c Equation (44) can be simplified upon noticing that the integral in the first term on the right-hand side is just the total energy associated with the observer. Upon specializing to the case of non-relativistic velocities. many textbooks dealing with general relativity do not emphasize the derivation of forces in enough detail. Discussion As mentioned in the introduction.

Covariant divergence of the stress-energy-momentum tensor was used to derive a general expression of the force experienced by the observer. Kerr black hole. The lapse function was expressed in Schwarzschild coordinates and then used with the general force of section 2. Newtonian acceleration produced an expression of the force equivalent to that obtainable by using Newton’s second law of motion. The familiar Newtonian expression of the force was retrieved upon specializing to the case of a weakly gravitating source. An alternative form of the general force was then derived by using the lapse function to relate the quantity of proper time that elapses per unit of coordinate time [10]. Expressing the Christoffel symbols in rotating coordinates led to an expression of the force in terms of the total energy and momentum of the observer in the rotating system. ∂j denotes partial differentiation with respect to a general coordinate q j . As a final consideration. Next. Using the general force and the components of the metric tensor in the accelerating system led to an expression of the inertial force experienced by the accelerating observer. Appendix When working in general coordinates. gi is a general basis vector pointing in the i−coordinate direction. an observer residing in arbitrary coordinates was used to demonstrate the relationship between forces and space-time geometry [1]-[9]. the force on the observer reduces to the expression of the force on an observer held stationary in Schwarzschild coordinates. it is helpful to have the gradient operator already worked out ahead of time.1) where g ij is the inverse metric tensor. . ψ. It was then shown that when the angular momentum of the black hole is put equal to zero. Specializing to the case of weak. in section 5 a form of the general force expressed in terms of the stress-energy-momentum tensor and Christoffel symbols was used to derive the force on an observer moving in rotating coordinates. In section 2. Specializing to the case of slowly rotating coordinates led to well known expressions of the centrifugal and Coriolis forces on the observer. the general force and lapse function were used in familiar coordinate systems. an observer held stationary near a large gravitational source was considered. leading to the well known general relativistic expression of the gravitational force [10]. The general force was applied in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates for the case of an observer being dragged around the black hole. Section 4 was devoted to deriving the force on an observer near a rotating.Forces in General Relativity 12 previous sections demonstrate straightforward methods for computing forces by way of general relativity. The gradient of an arbitrary scalar function. The section began by considering the local co-moving coordinate system of a uniformly accelerating observer. In section 3. is expressed in general coordinates as [15] ∇ψ = −gi g ij ∂j ψ (A. This led to an expression of the force in agreement with the literature [10].

4) √ Using (A. one must resort to using the full expression of the gradient given by (A. (A.2).4) in (A.6) 1 2 h1 ∂q h2 ∂q h3 ∂q 3 Thus.5) or (A.2) simplifes greatly. . In Schwarzschild coordinates. e3 ) are basis vectors of unit length pointing in their respective coordinate √ directions. Summing over the indices i and j puts (A. For the special case when the metric tensor gij is diagonal.1) in the expanded form −∇ψ = g1 g 11 ∂1 ψ + g 12 ∂2 ψ + g 13 ∂3 ψ + .2) where the minus sign has been moved to the left-hand side of (A. 2. (A. spherically symmetric body of mass M .2) for the sake of simplicity.3) In addition. Upon introducing the Lam´e coefficients. With suitable expressions of the gradient operator in hand. hi = −gii . but when the coordinate system is non-orthogonal. either (A. (A. (A. g2 g 21 ∂1 ψ + g 22 ∂2 ψ + g 23 ∂3 ψ + . g3 g 31 ∂1 ψ + g 32 ∂2 ψ + g 33 ∂3 ψ (A. when gij is diagonal we can put g ii = 1 1 1 √ =√ . . The inverse metric tensor in Schwarzschild coordinates is g µν = 1+ 2φ −1 2 c 0 0 0 0 − 1+ 0 0 0 2φ c2 0 0 0 −r−2 0 −2 0 −r sin−2 θ .8) . .7) where φ is the gravitational field potential outside a large. gii −gii −gii (A. 3). let us derive the gradient operator in Schwarzschild coordinates as a simple example. .Forces in General Relativity 13 and Latin indices are taken over the values (1.3) and putting ei = gi / gii leads to e1 e2 e3 −∇ψ = √ ∂1 ψ + √ ∂2 ψ + √ ∂3 ψ −g11 −g22 −g33 (A. leaving us with −∇ψ = g1 g 11 ∂1 ψ + g2 g 22 ∂2 ψ + g3 g 33 ∂3 ψ.5) where (e1 . the metric tensor is given by gµν = 1+ 0 0 0 2φ c2 0 − 1 + 2φ c2 0 0 0 −1 0 0 0 −r2 0 2 0 −r sin2 θ (A.6) can be used when the metric tensor gij is diagonal. e2 .5) assumes the familiar form of the gradient in orthogonal coordinates: e1 ∂ψ e2 ∂ψ e3 ∂ψ −∇ψ = + + . (A.

Theor. Sci. Thorne K and Wheeler J 1973 Gravitation (New York: Freeman) p 331 [17] Desloge E 1990 Relativistic motion of a free particle in a uniform gravitational field Int. Upon substituting the components of (A. 73 248 [5] M¨ uller H. 62 923 [19] Schiff L 1939 A question in general relativity Proc. Phys. 67 [11] Ridgely C 2010 Archimedes’ principle in general coordinates Eur. Peters A and Chu S 2010 A precision measurement of the gravitational redshift by the interference of matter waves Nature 463 926 [6] Einstein A 1988 The Meaning of Relativity.Forces in General Relativity 14 Since the metric tensor gµν is diagonal. J. J. the Lorentz force. eϕ ) are respective vectors of unit length in the (r. Phys. The Principle of Relativity (New York: Dover) p 69 [13] Weyl H 1952 Space-Time-Matter 4th edn (New York: Dover) p 202 [14] Born M 1965 Einstein’s Theory of Relativity (New York: Dover) p 283. and the Maxwell equations Am. 286 [15] Jonsson R 2006 An intuitive approach to inertial forces and the centrifugal force paradox in general relativity Am.5). ϕ) directions.7) directly into (A. J. eθ . Including the Relativistic Theory of the Non-Symmetric Field 5th edn (New Jersey: Princeton University Press) p 79 [7] Born M 1965 Einstein’s Theory of Relativity (New York: Dover) p 339 [8] Schutz B 1990 A First Course in General Relativity (New York: Cambridge) p 125 [9] Ohanian H and Ruffini R 1994 Gravitation and Spacetime 2nd edn (New York: Norton) p 163 [10] Thorne K. Acad. Price R and Macdonald D 1986 Black Holes: The Membrane Paradigm (New Haven: Yale University) p 13. USA 25 391 . it is straightforward to see that the gradient operator assumes the form 2φ ∇→ 1+ 2 c !1/2 er eθ ∂ eϕ ∂ ∂ + + ∂r r ∂θ r sin θ ∂ϕ (A. 29 193 [18] Crater W 1994 General covariance. Phys. Phys. Lorentz covariance.9) where (er . the gradient operator may be derived by way of (A. J. 147 [2] Bergmann P 1976 Introduction to the Theory of Relativity (New York: Dover) p 160. Natl. 74 905 [16] Misner C. J. 31 491 [12] Einstein A 1952 Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy-content? Einstein. 198 [3] Kenyon I 1990 General Relativity (New York: Oxford) p 63 [4] Jonsson R 2005 Visualizing curved spacetime Am. References [1] Weinberg S 1972 Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (New York: Wiley) p 126. θ. Phys.5).

- AP Physics B Formula Study SheetUploaded bynanio_7
- static lab 1.docxUploaded byhaziqsyah
- Fp_b.1_abb_ Dynamic Design Tools for Improved Short Circuit Design of Power TransformersUploaded byBash Mat
- mechanicsUploaded bychandan_j4u
- Clashed in Qm TheoryUploaded byNur Izzati
- Bmat Physics Formula SheetUploaded byDrAIyer
- MotionsUploaded byDonald Bose Mandac
- Chapter 7Uploaded bySanthiya Madhavan
- Suggested Soln to Physics N2005 P1Uploaded byJun Yang
- Physics Form 4. Chapter 2. 2.5 ForceUploaded byNuridahBintiZaimi
- Relativity Gravity Probe Press KitUploaded byBob Andrepont
- FORCE AND MOTION.pptxUploaded byMaturan Peach
- www myjntuk com civil r13 syllabus123Uploaded byapi-342168781
- 10841 Physics (Pink) P1Uploaded bygrace_lo_1
- Science 6th paperUploaded byNarendra Jadhav
- phy u1Uploaded byKrystin Lim
- Physics Syllabus for Year 12 2015 PDFUploaded byMatt Champion
- D51 1485--G_EN - Peeling 90 AdhesiveUploaded byTeoTyJay
- MLecturasae1Uploaded byPrincess Dainne Fontanilla Dahilig
- MEG373.CHP05.Forces.problemsUploaded byDavorinBazijanac
- AIEEE 2010Uploaded byAshish Kumar
- Physics DefinitionsUploaded byMarcus Chua
- Classical Mechanics and its application to aerospace systemsUploaded byValentin
- 9702_y12_syUploaded bySalman Rahman Sunny
- Numerical Methods for EngineersUploaded byNawar Cullen
- Quantum Gravity as derived from PiUploaded bySpacedustSC
- 9702 y13 Sy RevisedUploaded byAshter Hussain
- Heaviside_1893_paper.pdfUploaded byscribdfabs
- Binder 1Uploaded byNudrat Nida
- Kinematics, Forces and Torque.docxUploaded byCai Peng Fei

- El crit de la llenguaUploaded byMarco Jones
- El occitanoUploaded byMarco Jones
- Back-reaction of the Hawking radiation ux on a gravitationally collapsing star II: Fireworks instead of rewallsUploaded byMarco Jones
- REAL ACADEMIA DE HISTORIA - Razón del nombre de Principado de CataluñaUploaded byMarco Jones
- Teoría Perturbaciones Muchos Cuerpos - p8_mpnUploaded byMarco Jones
- Tesis Que Demuestra Que Los Valencianos No Descendemos de Los Catalanes (Ver Tabla7 Pág. 89)Uploaded byMarco Jones
- Introducción Al Modelo Estándar en El Background Field Method ElectrodébilUploaded byMarco Jones
- Revisi´on de la teor´ıa de perturbaciones en Relatividad GeneralUploaded byMarco Jones
- Entanglement Between Photons that have Never CoexistedUploaded byMarco Jones
- SOBRE EL PRINCIPIO DE EQUIVALENCIA DE LA RELATIVIDAD GENERALUploaded byMarco Jones
- Algunos Problemas en La Enseñanza de La r.e. 02124521v21n1p135Uploaded byMarco Jones
- Electrodinámica Cuántica Bidimensional. RenormalizaciónUploaded byMarco Jones