This is a statistical analysis on the Everett Fire Department response times the entire data set and partitions of the data during the year 2006. Statistics was provided in order to help the department understand if more fire personnel are needed within the city.

© All Rights Reserved

777 views

This is a statistical analysis on the Everett Fire Department response times the entire data set and partitions of the data during the year 2006. Statistics was provided in order to help the department understand if more fire personnel are needed within the city.

© All Rights Reserved

- Smoking Report_E109_UCI
- TESDA TM Pre test
- The Perception of Customer Satisfaction in Textile Industry According to Genders in Turkey
- Sharma, Singh (2007) a Correlation Between P-wave Velocity, Impact Strength Index, Slake Durability Index and Uniaxial Compressive Strength
- Consumer Perception towards Domestic Flight in Bangladesh
- 7651-Article Text-16966-1-10-20180929
- 10-2-1
- Statistics for Biology
- 45 63 3(1)2010 Syed Mohammad Naqi Abbas
- Saad MIP Output 1
- SPSS2 Guide Basic Non-parametrics
- Statistics & Molecular MRCP1
- 99-03
- Brand Personality in Rural Area - A case study of FMCG in Vidisha District of Madhya Pradesh
- genu valgum 2
- Findings Results
- skittles project part 3
- The influence of quality .pdf
- ttest.pdf
- Family vs Non-family Business

You are on page 1of 11

(2006)

Phil Engel / Ben DuSchene

Math 370: Statistics for Engineers

October 16th, 2015

Min. Response Time

Max. Response Time

Mean (Average) Response Time

Median

Standard Deviation

Variance

0 secs

29 mins 46 seconds

4 mins 52 seconds

4 mins 32 seconds

3 mins 34 seconds (00:03:34)

12 minutes and 45 seconds

Page |2

Table of Contents

Graphical Analysis of Response Times for Global Data ................................................................................... 3

One-Sample Z: Total Response Time in Minutes ......................................................................................... 4

Fire Zone Response Times ............................................................................................................................... 4

Two sample T-test:........................................................................................................................................... 6

Two-Sample T-Test and CI: BA245, BA400: ................................................................................................. 6

Two-Sample T-Test and CI: Medx, Medic: ................................................................................................... 7

Shortest Response Time: ................................................................................................................................. 7

Calls in the 900s resulting in patient transport:.............................................................................................. 8

Extra Statistical Information: ........................................................................................................................... 8

Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................ 8

Appendix A ....................................................................................................................................................... 9

Appendix B ..................................................................................................................................................... 10

Works Cited .................................................................................................................................................... 11

Page |3

Graph 1

Above is a graph showing the statistical data of the global response times plotted on a probability plot.

This plot graphs the response times vs. the percent probability of that plot roughly 10% of the recorded

response times for incidents are between 0 and 1 seconds. Response times from 10% to 90% (Or a net of

80% of the global population data) fall between 0 minutes and 9 minutes. Response times from 90% to

99.99% (Or a net of 9.99% or ~10%) fall anywhere between 10 minutes and 30 minutes.

The Logistic Cumulative Distribution graph was utilized because when comparing it to other graphs, the

logistic plot had the lowest AD value and the highest P-value. These values tell us this graph was the best

fit to model characteristics of a normally distributed set of data. Our sample size of the global population

data we analyzed was N=5,332 samples. Other graphs that were considered fell outside of the parameters

of consideration for normalcy and are shown in Appendix B.

By performing a Z-test, we can test a random sample of the response time data and compare it to Everett

Fire Departments 2006 response time average that was calculated.

Z-test:

0 = = 0

1 = > 0

Page |4

Test of = 4.8674 vs < 4.8674

The standard deviation = 3.5606

Variable

Total Response Time in minutes

N

Mean StDev SE Mean

5293 4.9033 3.5606 0.0489

4.9838

Z P

0.73 0.768

This data indicates that there is a 76.8% chance that the response time of any call will not be greater than

4.87 minutes.

Here we pulled data from discovering the fire zones with the longest response time and shortest response

time. We decided to do a Z-Test and and a T-Test on a random sample of those fire zones to compare the

two test and show that they are similar in the values that they produce. Then a comparison was made

from the sample mean to the population mean to see if the response times generally take that long to get

to that specific fire zone.

QUESTION: What fire zone is the maximum response time from? The longest response time with a

recorded fire zone was Fire Zone BA342 with a response time of 26 minutes and 11 seconds. We decided

to do a Z-test and T-test to test the probability of a sample mean of the BA342 fire zone being higher than

the population mean. In other words, does the highest recorded response time happen all the time in this

fire zone, and what is the probability of a trip to Fire Zone BA342 taking this amount of time compared to

your yearly average response times?

Z-test and T-test calculations:

0 = = 0

1 = > 0

=

Page |5

0 =

=

>

(

(

(

7.63 4.867

= 2.45

3.561/10

.05 = 1.645

7.63 4.867

) = 2.45

3.561

10

= 0.992857

))

Population mean: 0 = 4:52 minutes

Sample mean: = 7:37 minutes

Standard deviation: = 3:34 minutes

We fail to reject the hypothesis that the sample mean is greater than the hypothesized mean.

This means 99.3% of the samples are within the mean where the mean is 4.867 minutes. This

calculation was done within a confidence interval of 95%.

0 =

7.63 4.87

= 1.26

6.92/10

,1 = .05,9 = 1.833

,1 Value from Table II in Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. Montgomery, 5th

Edition

Because 0 < ,1, we fail to reject the null hypothesis that the sample mean is greater than the

population mean.

The probability of the BA342 sample mean being the same as the global population mean is 88.1%

measured by the P-Value of the data, calculated from the t-value and an alpha of .05.

P(t = 1.833 > t0 = 1.26)

This P-value states that 11.9% of the time, the response time for fire zone BA342 will be greater

than the population mean (4:52 seconds).

Page |6

Sample values used were:

Population mean: 0 = 4:52 minutes

Sample mean: = 7:37 minutes

Sample standard deviation: = 5:55 minutes

The conclusion of these two tests was that they produce similar results and can be relied on to produce

probabilities within a certain measure of error.

A two sample T-test was performed on the response times for Station BA245 against BA400 and again on

Calls with a Medx vs Medic designation to test if these fire zone means were replicable to one another

(they have around the same mean value, and how often does happen). The results are shown below and

discussed. Using the formula below two separate tests were conducted.

0 =

1

2 0

2 2

1+ 2

1 2

Two-sample T for BA245 vs BA400

Sample values were: All BA245 and BA400 samples available

Population mean: 1 , 2 = 4:52 minutes

Sample mean: = 7:49 minutes

Sample standard deviation: = 5:49 minutes

Fire Zone

BA245

BA400

N

11

9

Mean

3.31

11.44

StDev

1.40

4.29

SE Mean

0.42

1.4

Table of Fire zone Values

Page |7

Estimate for difference: -8.13

95% CI for difference: (-11.51, -4.76)

T-Test of difference = 0 (vs ): T-Value = -5.45 P-Value = 0.000 DF = 9

Conclusion for BA245 and BA400:

This means the response times from different stations randomly chosen are not comparable. With a 95%

CI with upper bounds of -4.76 the T-value is too close to that value and has a high probability of falling

outside of that confidence level.

Two-sample T for Medx vs Medic

Mean StDev SE Mean

Fire Zone

N

Medx

25

Medic

25

Mean

5.77

17.30

StDev

2.08

4.55

SE Mean

0.42

0.91

Table of Medic vs Medx Values

Estimate for difference: -11.54

95% CI for difference: (-13.57, -9.50)

T-Test of difference = 0 (vs ): T-Value = -11.53 P-Value = 0.000 DF = 33

In the test for the medx vs medic there was a very large probability that the times would be

different.

A shortest response time could not be determined in a specific fire zone within the data, because multiple

fire zones had 0 second response times. Our class had an opportunity to ask questions with one of the

head firefighters, Sebastian Sittig, and determined that often fire fighters report in calls to dispatch where

they are already at the scene, and thus the response time would be zero or nearly zero seconds. From this

information it can be concluded that it is not possible to determine a specific fire zone with the shortest

response time because an instantaneous response could happen almost anywhere at any time.

Page |8

There were zero calls in our 2006 data which resulted in patient transport.

Performing a simple calculation on all of the response times, we can derive a comparison of a time of 5.75

minute with Everetts response times.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

April

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Incidents

163

165

153

148

186

222

280

259

191

190

2006

95%

81%

60%

90%

94%

92%

92%

48%

98%

90%

Nov.

Dec

Total

228

3145

5145

1.3%

100%

Chart 2

Chart 2 indicates the probability of times being less than the objective time of 5.75 minutes 90% of the

time.

Conclusion:

An experientially learned value from this report was processing data consistently is imperative to deriving

reliable data. The total response time data did not produce a reliable result that could be considered

normal. Referencing graph 1 it is seen that the times close to zero are abundant and skewed the data.

The total response times for the Everett fire station under investigation were reliably less than or equal to

the mean time of 4 minutes and 52 seconds. The Z-test and T-test produced similar results and if it were

not for defining features of sample size and known values could be used interchangeably. The Medic vs

Medx calls contained a high probability of being different. A possible conclusion drawn from this is that

the Responding entity valued one call as having a necessity to contain more urgency than the other.

The data gained from each year is the main point of interest in this report. As shown in chart 2, the

incidents dramatically increased in December 2006. It is presumed that this could either be in error or

more likely that this is the month the data is the most complete. Without further discussion from the

Everett Fire Department it is impossible to reason the nature of this anomaly. Another interesting note in

chart 2 is that in March and November calls were less likely to meet the demand times. This most likely is

due to high demand in calls and not enough personnel to cover the calls per a discussion with one of the

firefighters. The month of December has the highest probability of the calls being less than 5.75 minutes

and should be further analyzed. Further comparisons to the Seattle firefighters chart in Appendix A

indicates that the demands met are similar but there are many inconsistencies the 2006 Everett data that

are not present in the 2012 Seattle data. It is recommended that these inconsistencies be discussed with

the Everett fire department.

Page |9

Appendix A

http://www.seattle.gov/fire/deptinfo/AnnualReport/Seattle%20Fire%20Department%20Annual%20Repor

t%202012.pdf

P a g e | 10

Appendix B

P a g e | 11

Works Cited

Montgomery, Douglas C., George C. Runger, and Norma Faris Hubele. Engineering Statistics, 5th Ed.:

Student Solutions Manual. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2011. Print.

Seattle Fire Department Strategic Plan 2012-2017. Seattle?: Dept., 2012. Seattle Fire Department 2012

Emergency Response Report. 2012. Web. 16 Oct. 2015.

- Smoking Report_E109_UCIUploaded byAnthony Khong
- TESDA TM Pre testUploaded byjohnlycas
- The Perception of Customer Satisfaction in Textile Industry According to Genders in TurkeyUploaded byMeeraSuhaini
- Sharma, Singh (2007) a Correlation Between P-wave Velocity, Impact Strength Index, Slake Durability Index and Uniaxial Compressive StrengthUploaded byErwing Thomas
- Consumer Perception towards Domestic Flight in BangladeshUploaded bysourav
- 10-2-1Uploaded byDamjan Jaksic
- Statistics for BiologyUploaded byidawayu
- Saad MIP Output 1Uploaded bySaad_Waheed_4533
- 7651-Article Text-16966-1-10-20180929Uploaded byWardah
- 45 63 3(1)2010 Syed Mohammad Naqi AbbasUploaded byBilalTariq
- SPSS2 Guide Basic Non-parametricsUploaded byrich_s_moore
- Statistics & Molecular MRCP1Uploaded byRaouf Ra'fat Soliman
- 99-03Uploaded byhallowerdy
- Brand Personality in Rural Area - A case study of FMCG in Vidisha District of Madhya PradeshUploaded byIjmasBhopal
- genu valgum 2Uploaded byWilly Dwi Febrian
- Findings ResultsUploaded bybyrdbr08
- skittles project part 3Uploaded byapi-259576001
- The influence of quality .pdfUploaded byRajiv Kharbanda
- ttest.pdfUploaded bySezan Tanvir
- Family vs Non-family BusinessUploaded byRody El Khalil
- 6 1 practiceUploaded byapi-343368893
- Technology-Use-By-Faculty.pdfUploaded bydr arif
- HypoytentingUploaded byjonnydeep1970virgilio.it
- Assignment 9Uploaded byahmed
- 1-s2.0-S1877042814053956-mainUploaded byFadhia Adliah
- Teaching Statistics With GeogebraUploaded byAnonymous 5Qtn0QVDuO
- Book1Uploaded byMuhammad Ali Meer
- Pre-test & Post Test Analysis Sample ComputationsUploaded byMeydem Eelied
- APA 6 Methods Section GuideUploaded byJaredMark
- Corrected Art 4th ChapterUploaded bywali ahmed

- Thermodynamic Analysis of a Steam TurbineUploaded byPhil Engel
- Thermo ConversionsUploaded byPhil Engel
- Final Thermo ProjectUploaded byPhil Engel
- The Difference Between Being Smart, Educated, and Intelligent by Gian Fiero.pdfUploaded byPhil Engel
- Everett Fire Department Data Analysis 2009 & 2012Uploaded byPhil Engel

- Monte Carlo Simulation (Random Number Generation)Uploaded byAnonymous FZNn6rB
- ptsp_prsolutions08Uploaded byBaji
- Chapter 18Uploaded byCassie Desilva
- eco chpt 2Uploaded byIrfan izham
- SYSC 4405 - Quiz4 SolutionUploaded byAleksandra Diotte
- Chapter 0 SlidesUploaded bySriram
- VAISHHNAVI RECORD 1.docxUploaded byMonica Purushothaman
- 1Uploaded byShrey Mangal
- Lecture+14 SAS bootstrap and jackknifeUploaded byJoanne Wong
- 601 Class 05Uploaded byKarissa
- Probability Questions With SolutionsUploaded bykrackyournut
- Probability and SamplingUploaded byTsitsi Abigail
- Case Processing SummaryUploaded byve_atmadja
- Stat Test 1Uploaded byardyanovich
- Confidence IntervalUploaded bymeetwithsanjay
- Latin Hypercube Sampling for uncertainty analysisUploaded byIis Yulia
- Biostatistics NotesUploaded byWin Khaing
- Comparing Two Population MeansUploaded bySergio
- Lesson_7.pptUploaded byRengeline Lucas
- Estimation TheoryUploaded byTejaswi Joshyula Challa
- Practice Test Test 4_Bus2023_spring09_solutions.docUploaded byjon
- الاحصاء الوصفيUploaded by5224659
- The Tukey-Kramer ProcedureUploaded bymspandey2000
- Statistics_research08072018.pptUploaded bypradeep
- Statistical Basics for Micro Array StudiesUploaded bypateldhaval.in
- Reliability TestUploaded byEmmanuel Jimenez-Bacud, CSE-Professional,BA-MA Pol Sci
- Simple linear regression analysisUploaded byEngr.bilal
- Tutorial Sheet 4Uploaded byknegi123
- Quiz QuestionsUploaded byThenmozhi Ravichandran
- SummaryUploaded bySusnigdhamay Ray

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.