DBDsoft

© All Rights Reserved

78 views

DBDsoft

© All Rights Reserved

- Crane Girder Camber
- Performance Based Seismic Design
- Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures
- Moment Connection
- String Book
- Properties of Plastics
- 2011AISBEGUIDELINESCorr2_4-12
- Push Over Analysis for Concrete Structures at seismic zone-3 using ETABS software.pdf
- An Investigation on the Accuracy of Pushover Analysis
- SS SimulationXpress Study 1
- Ahmed 1998
- 57.pdf
- CIV4218 - Assignment #1 - Methods of Design
- Week 9 - Linear Structural Analysis - Lecture Presentation.pdf
- otani
- Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels.pptx
- POA_Mtech proj.pdf
- 13_2076
- 2102TN42
- material testing

You are on page 1of 93

Page 1 of 93

DBDsoft

Top Next

DBDsoft

Version 2014 standard

v. 0.9.0.0 November 2014

User Manual

graphic

graphic

Introduction

Introduction

DBDsoft is a program developed to assist engineers in the application of the Direct displacement-based seismic design

(DDBD) procedure of Priestley et al. (2007). The program is not intended as an analysis tool and instead, the software

relies on the user to indicate how the design solution should be developed. To this extent, while traditional modelling

information such as section dimensions and material properties are required, the strength and stiffness of elements are

not specified since they should be an outcome of the design process.

As the necessary performance of a building can be ensured through any one of many possible distributions of strength

(and stiffness), users of DBDsoft are required to indicate the proportions of the seismic loads that will be resisted by the

different elements of the load-resisting system. This very novel feature of the software recognises that inelastic seismic

force distributions can be controlled through good design (see Design Strength Proportions for further details).

With proportions of strength decided, the software will then compute the required design base shear and the required

flexural strengths of plastic hinge zones. In this current version of DBDsoft, the engineer should then calculate the

required reinforcement (reinforced concrete sections) or verify the steel profiles' capacity (steel sections) for each plastic

hinge zone and optimise the design solution as desired. The task of capacity design also needs to be undertaken by the

engineer, who should suitably amplify the plastic-hinge design actions indicated by the software to identify capacity

design actions for all members in the structure.

Users should verify the seismic performance of the design solution by using a code-compliant analysis method such as

pushover analysis or non-linear time-history analyses (the permissible method will depend on the local building code

requirements).

We, the developers, trust that you will enjoy the benefits that this software offers. We would welcome any comments

and suggestions that could improve future versions of the software.

Information for Academics

In order to cite this software in publications please use the following citation:

Sullivan, T.J., Bono, F., Nievas, C.I., Magni, F., Calvi, G.M. (2014) DBDsoft: A program for the displacement-based seismic

design of structures, Beta Version EUCENTRE, www.eucentre.it.

See the section on Background for some notes on the theory of the Direct Displacement-Based Seismic Design

procedure and for a list of references where more information may be found.

Contacting Us

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 2 of 93

Contacting Us

If you have any suggestions for improvements, or if you would like to receive an updated version of the software, please

email us at:

DBDsoft@eucentre.it

Release Information

Release Information

This version of DBDsoft is released as a trial version in order to gain feedback on the basic functioning of the program and

get suggestions on possible improvements that can be implemented in the subsequent versions. The release message,

viewed upon opening the software, is also shown here:

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

DBDsoft is intended to assist engineers apply the Direct Displacement-Based Design (DDBD) procedure of Priestley et al.

(2007). Whilst efforts have been made to verify the accuracy and robustness of this software, no guarantees are provided

that the DDBD calculations have been implemented correctly.

Consequently, the EUCENTRE and the program developers take no responsibility for the consequences that any errors

within the software may cause program users. Furthermore, users are advised that the DDBD procedure is not currently a

code-compliant seismic design solution and therefore they should verify code-compatibility of the design solutions

derived from the software by using analysis and design methods that conform with code requirements.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 3 of 93

About EUCENTRE

About EUCENTRE

EUCENTRE is a non profit Foundation launched by the Italian Deparment of Civil Defence ( Dipartimento della Protezione

Civile), the Italian National Institute of Geophysics and Vulcanology ( Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia), the

University of Pavia ( Universit degli Studi di Pavia ) and the University Institute for Superior Studies of Pavia ( Istituto

Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia), with the aim of promoting, sustaining and overseeing training and research in

the field of the reduction of seismic risk, through the following actions:

Development of applied research in the field of seismic engineering, oriented towards reaching concrete goals

of evaluation and reduction of vulnerability and risk;

Development of activities useful for the definition of specific lines of public action, guidelines and regulator

documents, bearing in mind the state of the art in the international scene as well;

Training personnel with strong scientific and professional capabilities in the field of seismic engineering, in

particular, in the field of seismology, geology, geotechnics, behaviour of materials and structures, design of

new structures, evaluation and retrofit of existing structures, even in emergency situations;

Carrying out scientific and technical consultancy at a national and international level, in the field of seismic

engineering.

Background

Background

Seismic design in current codes is based on force (and hence acceleration) rather than displacement, essentially as a

consequence of the historical developments of an understanding of structural dynamics and, more specifically, of the

response of structures to seismic actions and the progressive modifications and improvement of seismic codes worldwide.

In the first decades of the last century, after several major earthquakes, such as Messina (Italy, 1908), Kanto (Japan,

1925), Napier (New Zealand, 1932), and Long Beach (USA, 1933) the first design codes started being developed. These

codes were essentially prescribing specific detailing and construction rules and in cases the application of some lateral

inertia forces. Typically, and possibly in analogy with some kind of wind design, a value of about 10% of the building

weight applied as a vertically distributed lateral force was required, regardless of building period.

This initial force-based approach has been essentially retained with the progressive increasing of understanding of the

significance of structural dynamic characteristics, that lead to period-dependent design lateral force levels in most seismic

design codes, and even when it became clear that many structures had survived earthquakes capable of inducing inertia

forces many times larger than those corresponding to their structural strength, if a linear response was assumed.

This apparent inconsistency was explained after the first simple inelastic time-history analyses had been performed, and

the concept of ductility introduced, to reconcile the anomaly of survival with inadequate strength. In the seventys,

relationships between ductility and force-reduction factor were developed, introducing the well known concepts of

equal displacement, equal energy and equal force approximations, that appeared to be appropriate to estimate the

real structural response as a function of linear response and period of vibration of the structures.

Since then, ductility has been considered the fundamental parameter to estimate appropriate force reduction factors,

to be used to determine the design lateral force levels. Much research effort was therefore directed to determining the

available ductility capacity of different structural systems, performing extensive experimental and analytical studies to

determine their safe displacement capacity. It is now clear that this approach is implicitly assuming displacement

capacity, and not force capacity, as the basis for design. However, the design process is still carried out in terms of

required strength in essentially all codes of practice around the world and displacement capacity, if directly checked at all,

is only a final product of the design procedure.

This brief summary of the history of seismic design indicates that initially design was purely based on strength, or force

considerations. However, as demonstrated by Priestley (1993) and Priestley et al. (2007) there are several conceptual

drawbacks associated with the use of force-based methods in seismic design. With reference to the design of a RC

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 4 of 93

building possessing three walls A, B and C, illustrated in Figure 1, a brief review of some of the problems with force-based

design can be made.

Figure 1. Response of a RC structure possessing walls of different length used to highlight issues associated with

force-based design.

The main issues associated with current force-based design methods, identified and discussed in Priestley et al. (2007) in

detail, can be shown to involve:

The use of ductility capacity dependent force-reduction factors.

In order to obtain design force levels, code methods divide elastic forces by a force-reduction factor which is set in

proportion to the ductility capacity of the structure. However, the actual ductility demand for a structural system

will typically be smaller than the ductility capacity of the structure. The right side of Figure 1 presents the forcedisplacement behaviour for the three walls (A, B and C) and the total system as it is displaced to a deformation

limit required to control damage to non-structural elements. It is clear that in controlling non-structural

deformations the system ductility is less than the ductility capacity of the long stiff Wall B and considerably less

than the shorter flexible Walls A & C. Furthermore, as Walls A & C have considerably larger yield displacements

than Wall B, it is evident that the ductility capacity could not be developed in all the walls simultaneously. This

point suggests that the use of force-reduction factors that are based on ductility capacity is inappropriate.

The force distributions predicted through the use of the elastic stiffness for analysis.

As mentioned above, the force-based approach makes a prediction of the elastic forces of the structure and

uniformly reduces these by a behaviour factor to obtain inelastic design forces. However, because elements within

the structure do not all yield at the same level of deformation, the elastic force distribution can be very different

to the inelastic force distribution. This can be seen in Figure 1 by considering the elastic shear proportions that

have developed when Wall B first yields. It is clear that the shear in Walls A & C is only one-quarter that for Wall B

in the elastic state. However, at the design displacement of the system, it is clear that the proportion of shear in

Walls A & C has now doubled to be 50% of that in Wall B. This point demonstrates that elastic analyses using the

initial stiffness are inappropriate for predictions of inelastic force distributions.

The difficulty in defining the system ductility for mixed structural systems.

Current codes typically require that the behaviour factor for mixed structural systems be set equal to the lower of

the two systems. However, this does not consider how the ductility demands and forces will develop for the

combined structural system. For example, suppose that Wall B shown in Figure 1 only had a ductility capacity of

three, such that at the design displacement, its ductility capacity had been reached. The system ductility at this

displacement is obtained by dividing the design displacement by the yield displacement of the system, whereby

the yield displacement of the system would typically be obtained through a bi-linear representation of the system

response. Interestingly, it is evident that the system ductility demand is actually lower than the ductility capacity

of the critical element. The amount by which it is lower depends on the mixed system considered and larger

differences could be expected for different mixed systems, such as frame-wall structures. This point demonstrates

that force reduction factors cannot be easily set for mixed structural systems.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 5 of 93

The inter-dependency of strength and stiffness for certain structural types (such as RC structures).

It has been shown by Priestley (1998), Priestley and Kowalsky (1998) and Paulay (2002) that the yield curvature of

RC sections is principally a function of the section geometry and yield strain of longitudinal reinforcement.

Consequently, given that the cracked section stiffness is best defined using the secant stiffness to first yield as

EI=Mn/?y, (where E is the section modulus, I is the second moment of inertia, Mn is the section flexural strength

and ?y is the yield curvature) it is clear that the stiffness of a RC element will depend on the strength it is assigned.

In other words, the initial stiffness of Wall B in Figure 1 for example, could be doubled by simply doubling the

amount of longitudinal reinforcement in the section. As such, the stiffness is not purely a function of the section

geometry and therefore in order to know the cracked elastic period of vibration of an RC structure, the flexural

strength is required. As the force-based design procedure relies on the period of vibration in order to determine

the required strength, this point shows that the design procedure cannot be easily implemented for RC

structures.

The force-based design approach estimates the inelastic displacement response based on the elastic displacement

response. The relationship illustrated for the wall system within Figure 1 uses the equal-displacement rule,

whereby the inelastic displacement is assumed equal to the elastic displacement. This is the approximation

adopted in Eurocode 8. In the United States, however, different relationships are used whereby the inelastic

displacement is often approximated as being less than the elastic displacement, whereas in Japan the opposite

occurs and an equal energy approach is used such that the inelastic displacement is estimated to be larger than

the elastic displacement. In reality, the relationship between elastic and inelastic displacements should depend on

the hysteretic properties of the structure being considered, since these affect the energy dissipation

characteristics of the structure.

As these problems with force-based design have emerged and the importance of displacement has come to be better

appreciated, attempts to modify and improve existing force-based approaches have been made. In the 1990s and early

this century, however, several researchers started pointing out the inconsistency associated with the use of force for

design, proposing displacement-based approaches for earthquake engineering evaluation and design, with the aim of

providing improved reliability in the engineering process by more directly relating computed response and expected

structural performance. A review and comparison of different displacement-based design methodologies has been

provided by Calvi (2003) and Sullivan et al. (2004). The most developed DBD method currently available is the Direct DBD

approach, described in a text by Priestley et al. (2007) and also released in model code format (Calvi and Sullivan 2008).

While the guidelines in the model code have been relatively well tested for RC structures (see Pettinga et al. 2005, Sullivan

et al. 2006 and Beyer et al. 2008), further verification and development is required for other structural systems and for

complex response due to torsion and higher modes. As such, this version of DBDsoft has been developed for regular RC

buildings.

The main steps in the Direct DBD procedure are illustrated in Figure 2. The first task of the procedure, shown as Figure 2

(a), is to develop an equivalent SDOF representation of the MDOF structure being designed. This is achieved through

knowledge of the mass distribution and the displacement profile at maximum response. For some forms of MDOF

structure, such as the approach for RC walls, the displacement profile is obtained using first principles, whereas for other

MDOF structures, such as RC frames, empirical shape functions which have been calibrated to fit results of multiple nonlinear time-history analyses are used.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 6 of 93

Figure 2. Overview of the main phases within the Direct DBD approach (adapted from Priestley et al. 2007).

The displacement shape at maximum response signals an important difference between Direct DBD and force-based

design, which is highlighted in the second step of the procedure, shown as Figure 2(b). Direct DBD characterises the

structure to be designed using the effective or secant-stiffness to peak displacement response, whereas force-based

design uses the initial stiffness characteristics. The use of the secant-stiffness is based on the Substitute Structure

approach developed by Gulkan and Sozen (1974) and Shibata and Sozen (1976). The bilinear envelope of the lateral forcedisplacement response of the SDOF representation (shown in Figure 2(b)) illustrates the secant stiffness Ke at the

maximum displacement ?d.

This maximum or design displacement value is set by the designer to ensure acceptable levels of deformation for a given

risk event. When the displaced shape of the structure at maximum response is known, then the design displacement, d,

can be obtained using:

(1)

where n is the total number of storeys, and mi are the masses and i the displacements (or displacement shape) at level i.

With reference to Figure 2(a), this design displacement corresponds to the displacement at the effective height, he, of the

structure. The effective height is also a function of the displaced shape of the masses at maximum response, in addition to

the storey height, hi, as shown in Eq. (2). The effective height is useful for the estimation of the yield displacement and

(2)

Since the actual structural behaviour is non-linear, the effective stiffness is used together with an equivalent viscous

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 7 of 93

damping term, , representative of the combined elastic damping and hysteretic energy absorbed during seismic

response. To illustrate how this approach would account for different hysteretic characteristics, consider the curves

shown in Figure 2(c). For a given level of ductility demand, it can be seen that a structural steel frame building with

compact members is assigned a higher level of equivalent viscous damping than a reinforced concrete frame building

designed for the same level of ductility demand, as a consequence of larger amounts of hysteretic energy dissipated

during the inelastic cyclic response of steel sections.

With the design displacement of the substitute structure at maximum response established, and the corresponding

damping estimated from the expected ductility demands, the effective period, Te, at maximum displacement response

can be read from a set of displacement spectra for different levels of damping, as illustrated in Figure 2(d).

To continue with design, it is then necessary to consider how the period, T, of a SDOF oscillator can be related to its

stiffness, K, and mass, M, as is shown in Eq. (3).

(3)

The effective stiffness, Ke, of the equivalent SDOF system at maximum displacement can be found by inverting this

equation to arrive at Eq. (4).

(4)

Within Eq. (4), me is the effective mass of the structure participating in the fundamental mode of vibration at maximum

response. This is also established using the design displacement profile in accordance with Eq. (5).

(5)

From Figure 2(b), the design lateral force, Fd, which is equivalent to the design base shear force, Vb, is consequently given

by Eq. (6).

(6)

In order to obtain design strengths for individual members of the MDOF system, the design base shear from Eq.(6) is then

applied as a set of equivalent lateral forces up the height of the building. The lateral forces are set to be proportional to

the displacements of the seismic masses, as shown in Eq.(7):

Floors 1 to n-1:

(7a)

(7b)

Where, for building structures in which the main lateral resisting system forms plastic hinges over the full height of the

structure (e.g. frame structures), the value of k to be used in Eq.(7) is k = 0.9 and for building structures in which the

plastic hinges offering the main lateral resistance form at the base of the building (e.g. RC wall structures), k = 1.0. For

frame-wall systems, a value of k = 1.0 is adopted due to the fact that higher mode effects are not expected to be

significant for this kind of structures.

Priestley et al. (2007) explain that there are two options for identifying the design strengths of plastic hinge zones from

the equivalent lateral forces of Eq.(7). The first is to develop a structural model in which the effective stiffness of

yielding elements is specified rather than initial stiffness values. The second approach is to apply an equilibrium approach,

ensuring that the lateral resistance provided at each level matches the seismic demand (obtained as a storey shear force

by summing the equivalent lateral forces above the storey in question). For, say, a RC frame structure with multiple bays,

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 8 of 93

it is clear that different relative beam strengths could provide the same total storey shear resistance. As such (allowing

redistribution of initial elastic force proportions) the equilibrium approach gives the designer greatest flexibility in

optimising the seismic design solution. See Priestley et al. (2007) for more discussion of the equilibrium approach. See

Sullivan and Lago (2012) for details of the equilibrium approach applied for RC frames within DBDsoft.

The design concepts are thus relatively simple. Such complexity that exists relates to determination of the substitute

structure characteristics, the determination of the design displacement, and application of the equilibrium approach to

arrive at the final design strengths. All these aspects are undertaken by DBDsoft, with the user assisting in the equilibrium

analyses by specifying the desired strength proportions of plastic hinges.

Previous Top Next

Overview

Overview

The program is organised into three distinct phases: (i) the Pre-Processor Phase, (ii) the Processor Phase, and (iii) the PostProcessor Phase. An overview of each phase is provided below.

The Pre-Processor Phase is where the general information about the structure, necessary for design, is provided. The PreProcessor Phase requires completion of the following modules:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Materials

Sections

Element Classes

Nodes

Elements Connectivity

Restraint/Releases

Loads

Performance Criteria

The purpose of the Processor Phase is to identify the lateral load resisting system and run the design calculations. The

Processor Phase requires the user to indicate the load combination that should be considered. In addition, the user should

tell the program to identify the lateral stability systems, after which point the user should verify that the lateral stability

systems correspond to those envisaged for the structure. Once the lateral load resisting systems have been identified,

must indicate the proportions of overturning that they wish the different lateral load resisting systems to resist. This last

phase is an important design decision that the user should make as it will influence the distribution and magnitude of the

required strengths throughout the structure.

The Post-Processor Phase is where the results of the design solution can be obtained. The main results of interest will be

the required nominal flexural strengths (Mn) of plastic hinge regions.

For a detailed description of the information required in each phase see the relevant sections of this user manual.

For information on how the program works see the background section of this user manual and the references listed

there.

Getting Started

Getting Started

To develop a design solution, basic information on the structural geometry and material properties must first be defined

following the order (from left to right) of the tabs within the Pre-Processing unit.

To move between modules you can either directly click on the module heading or use the drop-down menu by clicking:

or

Modules>Previous Properties Module

Example Building

Example Buildings

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 9 of 93

Four case study models have already been developed within the program and by opening and reviewing them, users can

quickly see how a model should be defined. To access these examples you can select the models from the drop down

menu clicking:

File>Test Cases>TestB1

This case study structure represents an 8-storey RC wall building in which the lateral load resisting system is

formed of three cantilever walls.

File>Test Cases>TestB2

This case study structure represents a 6-storey RC frame building in which the lateral load resisting system is

formed of three separate frame systems.

File>Test Cases>TestB3

This case study structure represents a 6-storey RC frame-wall building in which the lateral load resisting system is

formed of one frame, two cantilever walls and one frame-wall system with link beams.

File>Test Cases>TestB4

This case study structure represents an 8-storey steel frame building in which the lateral load resisting system is

formed of one frame in the X direction.

Step-by-step computation of base shear demand and overturning moment at the base are provided for all examples here.

Note that information within the tables of the program can be copy-pasted (CTRL+C) into excel spreadsheets. This can be

useful for development of larger structures and for exchanging common input information with other programs (such as

Seismostruct; see www.seismosoft.com).

Pre-Processor

Pre-processor

The Pre-Processor Phase is where the general information about the structure, necessary for design, is provided. The PreProcessor Phase requires completion of the modules listed below, that are explained in the sub-sections that follow:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Materials

Sections

Element Classes

Nodes

Elements Connectivity

Restraint/Releases

Loads

Performance Criteria

Materials

Materials

To add a new material, first ensure that you have selected the Materials module (see Getting Started).

Then either click on the blue plus symbol (see Figure) or double click on the grid of the table. The form Add New Material

will then open. After providing the requested information (described in detail below) click on the Add and Close button to

confirm the addition of the new material.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 10 of 93

To add a new material enter the materials name, choose the material type (concrete and Reinforcing_ Steel, for

reinforced concrete structures, or Structural_Steel, for steel structures) and fill in the requested fields with the material

characteristics, in line with the recommendations in the next pages. Please note that in the current version of DBDsoft it is

not possible to combine reinforced concrete and steel sections.

Add new material>type>Concrete:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 11 of 93

The expected concrete compressive strength refers to concrete strength expected at the time of an

earthquake. Note that it is likely to be significantly greater than the concrete compressive strength at

28days due to the tendency for concrete to gain strength with time and the construction practice of

specifying characteristic rather than mean or median strength values. In lieu of more refined information,

Priestley et al. (2007) and Sullivan et al. (2012) recommend that fce = 1.3fc where fc is the 28 day

cylinder concrete compressive strength.

Strain at peak stress, ec or eo :

The strain at peak stress refers to the strain at which the concrete will be expected to have developed its

expected compressive strength. The provision of transverse confining reinforcement will tend to

increase the strain at peak stress such that values of 0.004 might be specified for unconfined concrete

compared to values of 0.010 for confined concrete. Currently, this version of DBDsoft does not use this

information in the calculations and therefore users can leave the default value of 0.003.

Ultimate compressive strain, eu :

The ultimate compressive strain refers to the strain at which the concrete will be expected to crush, even

if well confined. The value of ultimate strain will depend on the quantity, spacing and effectiveness of

transverse reinforcement. Currently, this version of DBDsoft does not use this information in the

calculations and therefore users can leave the default value of 0.01.

Specific weight:

The specific weight of concrete should be specified in units of kN/m3 with account for the weight of

reinforcement (i.e. it should correspond to the weight of reinforced concrete). The default value is

24.5kN/m3. Currently, this version of DBDsoft does not use this information in the calculations and

therefore users can leave the default value of 24.5kN/m3. To account for the weight of reinforced

concrete members, users should specify suitable seismic masses within the Loads module.

Once the material information has been specified, click on Add + Close.

The materials that have been added will then be listed in the grid. Repeat the operation for as many different material

properties as desired.

Aff Reinforcing Steel Material

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 12 of 93

The expected yield strength refers to the yield strength expected of longitudinal reinforcing bars at the

time of an earthquake. Note that it is likely to be greater than the characteristic yield strength which is

typically based on 5 th percentile values of strength. In lieu of more refined information, Priestley et al.

(2007) recommend that Fy = 1.1Fy,c where Fy,c is the characteristic yield strength of the reinforcing bars.

Ultimate strength, Fu :

The ultimate strength refers to the ultimate strength expected of longitudinal reinforcing bars at the time

of an earthquake, and will tend to be greater than the expected yield strength due to strain hardening.

Note that it is typically used in DBD to account for strain-hardening effects on the plastic hinge lengths of

walls and the like. In lieu of more refined information, one could specify Fu= 1.1Fu,c where Fy,c is the

characteristic ultimate strength of the reinforcing bars.

Elastic Modulus, E:

The elastic modulus of reinforcing steel should be specified with unit of MPa. Typical values for the elastic

modulus of reinforcing steel are between 200000MPa and 210000MPa.

Once the material information has been specified, click on Add + Close.

The materials that have been added will then be listed in the grid. Repeat the operation for as many different material

properties as desired.

Add Structural Steel Material

Add new material>type>Structural_Steel:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 13 of 93

The expected yield strength refers to the yield strength expected of the structural steel at the time of an

earthquake. Note that it is likely to be greater than the characteristic yield strength which is typically

based on 5 th percentile values of strength. In lieu of more refined information, Priestley et al. (2007)

recommend that Fy = 1.1Fy,c for S355 and S450, F y = 1.15Fy,c for S275, and F y = 1.2Fy,c for S235, where Fy,c

is the characteristic yield strength of the reinforcing bars.

Ultimate strength, Fu :

The ultimate strength refers to the ultimate strength expected of the structural steel at the time of an

earthquake, and will tend to be greater than the expected yield strength due to strain hardening. Note

that it is typically used in DBD to account for strain-hardening effects on the plastic hinge lengths of walls

and the like. In lieu of more refined information, one could specify Fu = 1.1Fu,c for S355 and S450, F u =

1.15Fu,c for S275, and F u = 1.2Fu,c for S235,where Fu,c is the characteristic ultimate strength of the

reinforcing bars.

Elastic Modulus, E:

The elastic modulus of reinforcing steel should be specified with unit of MPa. Typical values for the elastic

modulus of reinforcing steel are between 200000MPa and 210000MPa.

Once the material information has been specified, click on Add + Close.

The materials that have been added will then be listed in the grid. Repeat the operation for as many different material

properties as desired.

Sections

Sections

After defining the material characteristics, the geometry of the structural cross sections must be defined. To add a new

section, first ensure that you have selected the Sections module (see Getting Started).

Then either click on the blue plus symbol (see Figure) or double click on the grid of the table. The form Add New Section

will then open. After providing the requested information (described in detail below) click on the Add and Close button to

confirm the addition of the new section.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 14 of 93

The current version of DBDsoft has been developed for rectangular, circular and T-shaped RC sections, as well as IPE and

HE steel profiles. Please note that, in the current version of DBDsoft, T-shaped RC sections can only be used as beams, and

circular RC sections can only be used as columns. Future versions will include other section shapes, such as C- and Lshaped sections, and they will extend the possibility of use of currently existing sections.

After assigning a name (e.g. S1) for the section and selecting the section type, a series of parameters must be defined, as

described below. Please note the orientation of the sections local axes with respect to the definition of sections

parameters such as width and depth, for some features of the software assume a standardised engineering approach is to

be followed by the user. For example, Section Curvature performance criteria assume that wall and beam sections are

defined so that they bend around local axis 2.

Rectangular Sections

Rectangular Sections

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 15 of 93

Name:

Define a non-existing name for the new section.

Section Width:

The section width should be input (typically in units of metres). For a rectangular wall section, the section

width typically refers to the wall thickness. Note, that orientation of the section (i.e. whether the section

bends about its strong or weak axis for a given loading direction) will be controlled by defining the

direction of axis-3 using a non-structural node (see the Section on Nodes).

Section Depth:

The section width should be input (typically in units of metres). For a rectangular wall section, the section

depth typically refers to the wall length.

Material:

By clicking on the drop-down box a list of the materials that have been defined will appear. Select the

appropriate type of concrete for the section.

Rebars Material:

By clicking on the drop-down box a list of the materials that have been defined will appear. Select the

appropriate type of reinforcing steel for the section.

Fill in the section properties and click on the Add and Close button. The new section is listed in the Sections grid. Repeat

the procedure for as many other sections as required.

Circular Sections

Circular Sections

Note: in the current version of DBDsoft, circular sections can only be used for the definition of columns.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 16 of 93

Name:

Define a non-existing name for the new section.

Section Diameter:

Specify the sections diameter (typically in units of metres).

Material:

By clicking on the drop-down box a list of the materials that have been defined will appear. Select the

appropriate type of concrete for the section.

Rebars Material:

By clicking on the drop-down box a list of the materials that have been defined will appear. Select the

appropriate type of reinforcing steel for the section.

Fill in the section properties and click on the Add and Close button. The new section is listed in the Sections grid. Repeat

the procedure for as many other sections as required.

T-Shape Sections

T-Shape Sections

Note: in the current version of DBDsoft, T-shaped sections can only be used for the definition of beams.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 17 of 93

Name:

Define a non-existing name for the new section.

Section Width:

Specify the sections width (typically in units of metres), i.e. the beams horizontal dimension.

Section Depth:

Specify the sections depth (typically in units of metres), i.e. the distance from the bottom of the beam to

the top of the slab.

Slab Width:

Specify the width (typically in units of metres) of slab that will contribute with the beam to resist the

seismic actions.

Slab Thickness:

Specify the slabs thickness (typically in units of metres).

Material:

By clicking on the drop-down box a list of the materials that have been defined will appear. Select the

appropriate type of concrete for the section.

Rebars Material:

By clicking on the drop-down box a list of the materials that have been defined will appear. Select the

appropriate type of reinforcing steel for the section.

Fill in the section properties and click on the Add and Close button. The new section is listed in the Sections grid. Repeat

the procedure for as many other sections as required.

IPE Steel Section

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 18 of 93

Name:

Define a non-existing name for the new section.

Section Type:

Select the type of IPE profile from the drop-down menu.

Material:

By clicking on the drop-down box a list of the materials that have been defined will appear. Select the

appropriate type of structural steel for the section.

Fill in the section properties and click on the Add and Close button. The new section is listed in the Sections grid. Repeat

the procedure for as many other sections as required.

HE Steel Section

HE Steel Section

Name:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 19 of 93

Define a non-existing name for the new section.

Section Type:

Select the type of HE profile from the drop-down menu.

Material:

By clicking on the drop-down box a list of the materials that have been defined will appear. Select the

appropriate type of structural steel for the section.

Fill in the section properties and click on the Add and Close button. The new section is listed in the Sections grid. Repeat

the procedure for as many other sections as required.

Previous Top Next

Element Classes

Element Classes

After defining the material characteristics and section properties, a set of element classes must be defined. The purpose

of this module is to tell the program whether the sections defined should be considered as beam elements, column

elements or wall elements. This will be important for the plastic mechanism and deformed shape that the program will

assume during the design process. Note that floor diaphragm elements do not need to be specified and DBDsoft

automatically assumes rigid in-plane behaviour of floor diaphragms by constraining all nodes at the same level to move

horizontally together.

To add a new element class, first ensure that you have selected the Element Classes module (see Getting Started). Then

either click on the blue plus symbol or double click on the grid of the table (as for the Materials and Sections modules).

The form Add new element class will then open, shown below.

Select the section Type from the drop-down list, and then

Select the type of section that is being given this element classification.

Please note that for a wall element class, only rectangular sections will be listed, while for a beam class, all sections except

circular ones and, for columns, all sections except T-shape ones will be available. Future versions of DBDsoft will support

the use of T-shape as well as other sections for columns and walls as well.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 20 of 93

After providing the requested information click on the Add and Close button to confirm the addition of the new element

class.

Nodes

Nodes

Every structural element will be defined by a pair of nodes that set the ends of the element and a non-structural node

that is used to define the orientation (rotation) of the section (see the figures below).

To add a node, first ensure that you have selected the Nodes module (see Getting Started). Then either click on the blue

plus symbol or double click on the grid of the table (as for the Materials and Sections modules).

The form Add new node will then open, shown below.

Select the node Type from the drop-down list (either structural or non-structural), and then

Enter the X, Y and Z coordinates of the nodes. Note that non-structural nodes can be provided

anywhere on the plane of the local z-axis (see Figures above).

After providing the requested information click on the Add and Close button to confirm the addition of the new node.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 21 of 93

In order to speed up the process of node generation, it is possible to use the Automatic Incrementation tool, available

when clicking on the button labelled Inc.. When doing so, a window pops up asking the user to specify the increment to

be used for the new nodes names, the increments in each coordinate, and the number of new nodes to generate, as

shown in the figure below.

Additionally, with the aim of automatically generating more complex series of nodes, it is possible to paste tables

generated with external spreadsheet applications. Given the fact that the nodes coordinates are given all together in the

same column, separated from one another by three spaces, it is recommended to use functions to concatenate the X, Y

and Z coordinates in the spreadsheet.

Note that in the current version of DBDsoft, beams and columns are defined by nodes lying at their centrelines, and no

corrections are made to account for the fact that the bending moments at the faces of the elements are different than

those at their centrelines. In the case of frame-wall systems with link beams, however, this effect is considered, given its

importance in the determination of the walls contraflexure height and, hence, the design displaced shape.

Note as well that at roof level all nodes should be at the same elevation or the program will classify the structure as being

vertically irregular.

The user can modify node properties at any time. However, it is important to bear in mind that if the field to modify is the

nodes name, the current version of the software does not update it within the elements that have already been defined

using the previous name, and this update should thus be done manually by the user.

Element Connectivity

Element Connectivity

Structural elements can be defined by indicating the element class, the end nodes of the element and a non-structural

node that will define the orientation (rotation) of the section.

To add an element, first ensure that you have selected the Element Connectivity module (see Getting Started). Then

either click on the blue plus symbol or double click on the grid of the table (as for the Materials and Sections modules).

The form Add new element will then open, shown below.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 22 of 93

?

Select the element Type from the drop-down list (either beam, column, wall or rigid-link). Then

Select the Element Class from the drop-down list (the list will include all element classes specified in

the Element Classes Module). Then

Select the structural nodes that define the ends of the member, Node i and Node j, and then

Select the non-structural node that defines the orientation (rotation) of the section. Local axis 3 of the

elements section will be pointing at the non structural node selected. If the geometrical definition of

the element does not allow for local axis 3 to be directly pointing at the non-structural node, the axis

will be pointing at its projection over the plane of the section at Node i, as shown in the following

example:

Top view

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 23 of 93

Perspective - Non-structural node does not lie in the X-Y plane, but section maintains its orientation with respect to its

projection over the X-Y plane

After providing the requested information click on the Add and Close button to confirm the addition of the new element.

As mentioned here, it should be noted that in the current version of DBDsoft, beams and columns are defined by nodes

lying at their centrelines, and no corrections are made to account for the fact that the bending moments at the faces of

the elements are different than those at their centrelines. In the case of frame-wall systems with link beams, however,

this effect tends to be more significant due to the larger dimensions of walls. For this reason, users should use rigid links

in order to define the connectivity between walls and beams. For further information, please refer here.

Please note as well that the current version of DBDsoft only allows for steel beams and columns to be defined with their

local axes oriented parallel and perpendicular to the global axes. Defining steel beams and columns with other angles will

lead to the bending strength capacity of the sections to be estimated as zero. Future versions of the software will allow

for steel sections to be defined with any desired orientation.

In order to speed up the definition of structural members, it is possible to paste tables generated with external

spreadsheet applications. Given the fact that the elements properties are given all together in the same column,

separated from one another by three spaces, it is recommended to use functions to concatenate the element class, initial

node, final node and non-structural node that define the element within the spreadsheet.

Restraints/Releases

Restraints/Releases

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 24 of 93

Nodal restraints should be defined at the base of the building. Nodal releases can be defined to indicate pin releases

within members.

To add a restraint or release, first ensure that you have selected the Restraints/Releases module (see Getting Started).

Then either click on the blue plus symbol or double click on the grid of the table (as for the Materials and Sections

modules). The form Add new restraints/releases will then open, shown below.

To define a restraint or release you should then:

Give a name to the restraint or release that you are creating. Then

Indicate whether you would like to specify a restraint or release by using the drop-down menu. Then

Select, from the drop-down list, the number of the node to be restrained and then

Indicate, for each degree of freedom (DOF), whether the DOF is retrained (yes) or not (no).

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 25 of 93

Select, from the drop-down list, the number of the element in which to insert the release and then

For releases about the section axis 2 or 3, select the release situation that is desired using the options

provided in the drop down list (no release, released at both ends or released at one end only. Then

For releases in the axis 1 direction (i.e. for axial releases) only a yes/no selection is required. However,

note that the current version of DBDsoft does not take account of axial releases and therefore they should

not yet be used.

After providing the requested information, click on the Add and Close button to confirm the addition of the new restraint

or release.

Loads

Loads

Three different sub-modules must be completed within the Loads module;

(i) Load Cases,

(ii) Applied Loading,

(iii) Load Combinations.

The Load Cases sub-module is used to specify different load case scenarios that could be considered. For each Load Case a

series of applied loads (masses or earthquakes) can be defined (within the Applied Loading sub-module) and then in the

Load Combinations sub-module, one or more Load Cases can be combined by specifying different load combination

factors.

The inputs required for each sub-module are described in the following pages.

Load Cases

Load Cases

To add a new load case, first ensure that you have selected the Loads module (see Getting Started) and the Load

Cases sub-module. Then either click on the blue plus symbol or double click on the grid of the table (as for the

Materials and Sections modules). The form Add new load case will then open, shown below.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 26 of 93

Give a name to the load case that you are creating. Then

Select the Type of loadcase from the drop-down list. Note that in the current version only earthquake

load cases can be defined.

After providing the requested information, click on the Add and Close button to confirm the addition of the load

case.

Applied Loads

Applied Loads

To add a new applied load, first ensure that you have selected the Applied Loads sub-module. Then either click on

the blue plus symbol or double click on the grid of the table (as for the Materials and Sections modules). The form

Add new applied loading will then open, as shown below.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 27 of 93

Select the applied loading Type from the drop-down list (either lumped mass or seismic action in this

version of DBDsoft). Then

Select, from the drop-down list, the load case for which the lumped mass will be considered. Then

Select, from the drop-down list, the number of the node at which the lumped mass is to be located. Then

Select, from the drop-down list, the load case in which the seismic action will be considered.

Select, from the drop-down list, whether the design response spectrum should be considered dominated

by far-field events or near-field events. Note that the current version of DBDsoft does not yet modify the

design procedure for near-field events and therefore the (more common) far-field option should be

selected.

Insert the value of the corner period, corresponding to the value of period at which spectral displacement

demands stop increasing (shown as T D in the Figure below). According to EC8 the value of TD is typically

2s for the type 1 spectrum, but values should be obtained in line with national seismicity information.

Insert the value of the corner displacement. This value should correspond to the elastic spectral

displacement demand (shown as D.5% in the Figure below) associated with the period TD. For EC8 users,

this value should already include the effect of the soil factor S, given that the software does not allow for a

separate specification of this parameter. Please note that the current version of DBDsoft assumes that the

input spectrum will correspond to 5% and 3% elastic damping for reinforced concrete and steel structures,

respectively.

Insert the value of the peak ground acceleration (in units of m/s2 or similar). For EC8 users, this value

should correspond to PGA = S.ag, (i.e. it should already be amplified to account for local soil conditions).

The peak ground acceleration value is used in the short period range to ensure that the simplified shape

adopted for the design displacement spectrum is not overly conservative.

Indicate the direction of the earthquake loading (either X or Y direction). Note that only one seismic input

can be introduced for each direction per each Load Case, but more than one Load Case can be selected to

run simultaneously under the same Load Combination. For this reason, users must ensure that they only

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 28 of 93

specify realistic loading scenarios, in which no more than one earthquake at a time is considered for each

response direction.

After providing the requested information click on the Add and Close button to confirm the addition of the new applied

loading.

Load Combinations

Load Combinations

To add a new load combination, first ensure that you have selected the Load Combinations sub-module. Then

either click on the blue plus symbol or double click on the grid of the table (as for the Materials and Sections

modules). The form Add new load combination will then open, shown below.

Click within the table alongside each loadcase name (that you specified in the Load Cases sub-module)

and type the factor to be used to combine the different load cases. Note, in the current version of DBDsoft

users should only specify one load case and subsequently only one load combination, in which a 1.0 is

placed beside the load combination name.

After providing the requested information, click on the Add and Close button to confirm the addition of the new

load combination.

Performance Criteria

Performance Criteria

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 29 of 93

Performance Criteria should be specified for the limit state under consideration. The program will then establish the

design strengths required to satisfy the performance criteria. Three different types of performance criteria can be

specified in DBDsoft: (i) storey drift, (ii) section curvature, and (iii) chord rotation limits. However, note that the current

version of DBDsoft only permits the specification of storey drift limits. Note that at least one of the above performance

criteria must be specified in order for the program to run.

To specify a performance criterion, first ensure that you have selected the Performance Criteria module (see Getting

Started). Then either click on the blue plus symbol or double click on the grid of the table (as for the Materials and

Sections modules). The form Add new performance criteria will then open, shown below.

Give a name to the performance criterion that you are creating. Then

Select, from the drop-down menu, the type of performance criterion: maximum storey drift limit, storey

drift limit, section curvature limit, or chord rotation limit.

Maximum-Storey-Drift Limit

Maximum-Storey-Drift Limit

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 30 of 93

Enter the value of the storey drift limit. This limit should be expressed as a percentage of the storey height (i.e. the

distance between adjacent levels). Note that the program will check this storey drift limit in both the X and Y directions, at

all levels. After providing the requested information, click on the Add and Close button to confirm the addition of the

new performance criterion.

Enter the value of the storey drift limit, for each storey. This limit should be expressed as a percentage of the storey

height (i.e. the distance between adjacent levels). Note that the program will check this storey drift limit in both the X and

Y directions. Note as well that, if this option is used, values need to be introduced at all levels. If the user only intends to

introduce a certain limit at a specific level, then he/she should fill in the values corresponding to all the other storeys with

a hyphen (-).After providing the requested information, click on the Add and Close button to confirm the addition of the

new performance criterion.

Section Curvature Limit

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 31 of 93

Choose the element class type for which the criterion will apply, and enter a value for the section curvature limit. The

software gives the possibility of either applying the criterion to all elements that are defined using that class type, or to a

specific element, which must be selected from the corresponding drop-down menu. In order to transform plastic

curvature demands into equivalent plastic hinge rotations, it is also possible for the user to specify a plastic hinge length,

or to allow the software to compute it automatically based on empirical formulas, for which an estimated reinforcement

bar diameter needs to be provided. Finally, specify whether the criterion should be applied for bending about local axis 2

or local axis 3, or both. For the definition of the orientation of the local axes, please refer here. Currently, for beams and

walls it is only possible to specify curvature limits for bending about axis 2, given the fact that the software assumes that

the definition of the sections dimensions will be carried out so that the section works in bending around this axis. After

providing the requested information, click on the Add and Close button to confirm the addition of the new performance

criterion.

DBDsoft verifies the section curvature limits by calculating equivalent interstorey drift limits that correspond to the

attainment of the specified curvature for the element/s under consideration. This is done in a very similar fashion for all

element class types, but each of them presents its own peculiarities, as described in the following sections.

If the criterion is to be applied to several elements, the software calculates the equivalent interstorey drift limit

corresponding to each element and applies it to the storey in which the element is located. If more than one element

generates different equivalent interstorey drift limits at the same storey, the smaller is used for that specific storey.

Whether the specified limit state curvature is greater or smaller than the elements yield curvature is an important factor

for all element class types. In order to determine this parameter, DBDsoft makes use of the approximate formulas derived

by several authors and compiled as Annex 1 of the DBD12 Model Code shown here.

Given that no guidance can be found in literature regarding how to estimate the yield curvature of RC sections for axes

other than the principal ones, the following approximation is assumed (illustrated for the case of a wall):

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 32 of 93

For bending around local axis 3, the yield curvature is:

For bending around global axis Y (seismic excitation in direction X):

For bending around global axis X (seismic excitation in direction Y):

If the user specifies the use of an automatically computed plastic hinge length, the penetration length is calculated using

the expression of Priestley et al (2007), based on the estimated reinforcement bar diameter specified by the user when

determining the parameters for the performance criterion:

Specification of Several Section Curvature Criteria for the Same Element Class

If more than one section curvature criterion is specified for the same element class or particular element, the software

will verify each criterion separately. However, users must be aware that the plastic hinge length and estimated

reinforcement bar diameter of the last specified criterion will be used for all criteria related to that element / element

class.

The equivalent interstorey drift limits are first calculated for bending around the elements local axes (2, 3) and then

projected onto the global axes (X, Y). For the case of walls, it is assumed that no curvature limit is applied for bending

around local axis 3, and thus the out-of-plane deformation is ignored and assumed admissible. In order to complete the

design process, the user needs to verify the deformation capacity of the elements in all directions. The situation is

illustrated in the figure below:

For the case of columns, if curvature limits are specified for bending around only one of the local axes, then curvatures

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 33 of 93

around the other axis are also assumed admissible and need to be verified by the user. If, instead, the user specifies

curvature limits for bending around both local axes, the software will use the smallest resulting projection of the

equivalent interstorey drift, as shown in the following figure:

If the specified limit curvature (

) is greater than the yield curvature (

), the interstorey drift limit (in the direction

of the wall) at a level having a height equal to or greater than the contraflexure height (

) is determined as:

is the plastic hinge length which, as said before, can be directly defined by the user while

setting up the section curvatures performance criteria, or can be automatically computed by the software as:

where

, and

) to yield (

) is smaller than the yield curvature (

), the interstorey drift limit at a level

having a height equal to or greater than the contraflexure height (

) is determined as:

If the specified limit curvature (

) is greater than the yield curvature (

the beam) at the beams level is calculated as:

where

is the storey drift at frame yield, and is calculated as explained here, and

which, as said before, can be directly defined by the user while setting up the section curvatures performance criteria, or

can be automatically computed by the software as:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

where

Page 34 of 93

beams level is calculated as:

The software treats section curvature limits differently for columns located at the ground floor or in the upper storeys,

given that the latter should be protected from yielding through capacity design principles. In this way, if the column is not

located in the ground floor, and the specified limit curvature (

) is greater than 75% of the yield curvature (

software assumes that this performance criterion will not be critical. If, instead, the specified limit curvature (

smaller than 75% of the yield curvature (

specified) for that storey is calculated as:

where

), the

) is

), the equivalent interstorey drift limit (in the direction of local axis 2 or 3, as

If the column is located in the ground floor and the specified limit curvature (

), the interstorey drift limit at the level of the column is determined as:

if

if

where

is the columns contraflexure height, is the columns height, and

is the plastic hinge length for the

column which, as said before, can be directly defined by the user while setting up the section curvatures performance

criteria, or can be automatically computed by the software as:

If the column is located in the ground floor but the specified limit curvature (

), the interstorey drift limit at the level of the column is determined as:

if

if

Enter the value of the chord rotation limit. This limit should be expressed as a rotation value with units of radians. Select,

from the drop-down list, the element for which the chord rotation limit will be applied. Note that for bi-directional

elements, such as columns, the user is further prompted to indicate whether the curvature limit acts about the sections

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 35 of 93

strong or weak axis. After providing the requested information, click on the Add and Close button to confirm the addition

of the new performance criterion.

Please note that this option is not yet available in the current version of DBDsoft.

Processor

Processor

The purpose of the Processor Phase is to identify the lateral load resisting system and run the design calculations. The

Processor Phase requires the user to indicate the load combination that should be considered. In addition, the user should

tell the program to identify the lateral stability systems, after which point the user should verify that the lateral stability

systems correspond to those envisaged for the structure.

Once the lateral load resisting systems have been identified, the user must indicate the proportions of overturning

moment that they wish the different lateral load resisting systems to resist. This phase is an important design decision

that the user should make as it will influence the distribution and magnitude of the required strengths throughout the

structure.

Finally, the user is also required to specify an overstrength factor to be used to estimate the capacity design forces that

should be withstood by members that need to remain elastic during seismic action.

Design Case

Design Case

The Design Case module within the Processor Phase is used to select the load combination that will be considered in the

design and to identify the relevant performance criteria for the selected load combination.

To specify this information, first ensure that you have selected the Design Case module (see Getting Started) within the

Processor phase of the program. To provide the necessary information simply do the following:

Click on the first drop-down list and select the load combination that should be considered. The list of loadcombinations will include all those specified in the Pre-Processor phase.

Then click on the second drop-down list and select the performance criterion that should be considered for the

design.

Finally, specify a value for the overstrength factor to be used to estimate the capacity design forces that should be

withstood by members that need to remain elastic during seismic action. As described here, this overstrength factor

should normally be established based on a moment-curvature analysis of members. The default value is 1.30.

The Set Design Strength Proportions module within the Processor Phase is an important design phase. The module is used

to firstly identify and classify the lateral load resisting systems (e.g. frames or walls) and then ask the designer to indicate

what fraction of the lateral load (i.e. what strength proportions) should be carried by each sub-system. These strength

proportions will then be used by the program when evaluating the required design strength of the whole system.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 36 of 93

To complete this module, first ensure that you have selected the Set Design Strength Proportions module within the

Processor phase of the program. When selected for the first time, the following image should be visible:

As indicated in the figure above, the first task is to click on the Identify Lateral Stability Systems button. The program

then groups together all lateral load resisting elements that will be considered to work together.

The figure below shows how the program identifies three separate frame systems, each identified by a different colour,

within the frame example case study. Also note that the program indicates (in yellow here) where the plastic hinges will

be assumed to form, as well as any node restraints (in green here) or member releases (in blue here) if present.

Having told the program to identify the lateral load resisting systems, the designer should check that the systems were as

intended. Note that for frame structures the program assumes that a beam-sway mechanism will be desired and

therefore all beam ends that are connected (without a release) into a column will be assumed as potential plastic hinge

regions. In addition, all column bases will be assumed as plastic hinge locations, unless a release is provided at the column

base. Similarly, plastic hinges are assumed to develop at all wall bases. In the current version, the location of plastic hinges

cannot be shifted, and the designer should account for this if the intention is actually not to form plastic hinges in the

locations assumed by the program. End releases can be specified by the user to indicate that a certain assumed plastic

hinge is not such. For example, if a frame and a wall are connected by beam elements released on both ends, the

software will simply interpret this as rigid link connections and the beams will not be considered to be acting as link

beams.

If a column is linked to the rest of the structural system only by beams that are released on both ends, a warning message

will pop up, explaining the user that an isolated column has been found. Since the current version of the software cannot

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 37 of 93

yet treat isolated columns as if they were cantilever structures, the user needs to either eliminate the conflictive member

or re-define it as a wall member (using a Wall Element Class). It is noted that the approximate method for determining the

design profile of walls and frame-walls systems suggested in DBD12 is valid for walls with aspect ratios (i.e. ratio of total

height to length) greater than or equal to 3.0.

For the definition of the direction in which each sub-system works, the software allows for a 5 tolerance. This means

that, for example, if a frame is contained in a plane inclined at 5 or less with respect to the X global axis, the software will

assume that the frame works only in the X direction.

The next task within the Set Design Strength Proportions module is to indicate the local or global strength proportions.

Local strength proportions refer to the ratio of the bending moment of a single plastic hinge to the sum of the bending

moments of all plastic hinges in the local sub-system for a given excitation direction. In other words, they are the ratio of

the overturning moment carried by a single plastic hinge to the one carried by all plastic hinges in the local sub-system.

Local strength proportions are denoted by the xx or yy symbols for the X and Y directions respectively. They can be set

by the designer to optimise, for example, the required beam strengths within a frame structure by specifying that all

beams at the same level within a frame will be provided the same strength (and therefore same beta value). To specify

the local strength proportions, click on one of the buttons as shown in the figure below. These buttons become available

after selecting a sub-model from the sub-models list below.

As a cantilever wall should only form a single plastic hinge at the base of the wall, local strength proportions need not be

specified for walls when these are not part of frame-wall systems (the xx and yy values for walls are simply 100%). For

frame and frame-wall structures, local strength proportions are required and upon clicking the local strength proportion

buttons, the following form will open:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 38 of 93

Within the table the user should then complete the fields shown in green, by inserting the strength proportions they

desire. When link beams (i.e. beams with one or two of their ends rigidly connected to walls and transmitting bending

moments to them) are specified, an additional line is added to the grid showing the additional contribution to the general

overturning moment resistance provided by them. The user simply needs to specify the strength proportion

corresponding to the plastic hinge at the face of the wall, and the software automatically computes this additional

contribution as shown in the equation below, which automatically accounts for the possibility of having releases specified

at either end of the link beam.

When clicking on Update Values, the software will automatically check that the sum of the strength proportions adds to

100%, that the summation of strength proportions at each level is different from zero and that the summation of strength

proportions at each level is smaller than that of the levels below (except with respect to the ground floor). If the sum of

the strength proportions lies between 99% and 101%, the software presents the user the option of scaling all the values

by the ratio between 100% and the actual sum. If the structure is a frame-wall with linked beams, the strength proportion

allocated to the walls base is kept constant and all the other values are scaled. Only when the values introduced have

passed all the relevant checks, the OK button is enabled.

It is noted that users can paste values from the clipboard into the form (if they, for example, generated them using a

spreadsheet). However, if no value has been manually modified before performing this operation, it can occur that the

user needs to press ENTER in order for the Update Values button to become available.

The user should note as well that the current version of DBDsoft does not save the local strength proportion values and,

thus, if the file is closed, it will be necessary to introduce them again.

Auto-Betas Function

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 39 of 93

In order to speed up the assignment of local strength proportions in frames and frame-walls, the program offers users the

option for beta values to be computed automatically. The button for this option is located on the lower left corner of the

input form, as shown in the figure above. By clicking on it, the program automatically assigns a series of beta values

whose calculation depends on the structural type, and the user only needs to click on Update Values and OK to close

the form. Note that these values are not necessarily the optimum, but should lead to reasonable results.

When the structure in a specific direction consists only of frames, the Auto-Betas are computed based on the design shear

profile expected for a frame determined from the provisions for design displaced shape and distribution of base shear in

height specified in DBD12. The values thus obtained are distributed within each floor using the proportions of

approximate strength of the sections defined by the user in the Sections module. The general expression for the

computation of the Auto-Betas for a pure frame structure is:

If the structure in a specific direction consists, instead, of frames and walls simultaneously, the Auto-Betas are calculated

based only on the estimation of the strength of the sections specified by the users, for the wall will then be designed to

carry the design shear not carried by the frames. The use of constant beam strengths along the height comes up as an

appealing option that certainly eases the construction process. It is possible to obtain a constant shear profile in the

frames at all levels by designing all beams for equal strength except at the roof, where the beam strength should be

reduced by half, and by allocating that same strength proportion of the roof beams to the plastic hinges at the base of the

columns.

The estimation of the strength of reinforced concrete members is carried out automatically by the software, assuming a

reinforcement ratio of 3% for beams and columns and 1.2% for walls. It should be noted that these reinforcement ratios

correspond to the total reinforcement of the member (i.e. it includes reinforcement both in tension and compression).

The approximate flexural strength is estimated as:

where

is the sections gross area,

is the expected yield strength of the reinforcing steel bars,

is the concrete

expected compressive strength, and are the sections height and base, respectively, as defined by the user in the

Sections module, and is the axial load ratio. Circular columns height and base are simply taken as

times the

diameter of the section. T-shaped beams base corresponds to the beams width, and thus their resistance only differs

from that of a rectangular section in the fact that the gross area accounts for the whole real section. For the estimation of

the base columns flexural strength, the software assumes (gravity) axial load ratios of 0.25 and 0.40 for external and

internal columns, respectively, and 0.10 for shear walls. It is noted that the characterization of a column as being external

or internal is carried out based on it being the extreme of the submodel under consideration. Whether this assumption is

correct or not depends on the geometry of the building and the way it has been modelled. In cases like this, the user

needs to account for this difference and manually adjust the strength proportions, if desired.

The estimation of the strength of steel sections is carried out assuming that the sections can fully develop their plastic

moment (

) and, thus, lateral supports and section stiffeners will be designed and provided to prevent

lateral and lateral-torsional buckling problems. It is noted that the estimation of flexural strength of steel columns is

carried out accounting only for interaction with axial forces (with the same axial load ratios defined for reinforced

concrete sections), but not with shear. Interaction with axial forces is incorporated using the approach of Eurocode 8, that

is, reducing the plastic moment (

) capacity as shown in the following equation:

and is the flange thickness.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 40 of 93

Note that the flexural strengths computed as explained above are only approximations based on a series of assumptions,

and serve the sole purpose of assisting in calculating reasonable strength proportions to be assigned automatically by the

program. Actual reinforcement contents, steel profiles and final strength proportions should be computed by the

designer.

Global strength proportions refer to the ratio of the overturning resistance provided by a specific sub-model as a whole

and the total design overturning moment. They are denoted by the x or y symbols for the X and Y directions,

respectively, and can be set by the designer to reduce torsion, for example, or to ensure that walls possess similar

reinforcement ratios, even if their lengths are different (see Priestley et al. 2007 for further clarification). To specify the

global strength proportions, click on the button indicated in the figure below.

Upon clicking the global strength proportion button, a form such as that shown below will open, with the number of rows

equal to the number of sub-systems (GMs) identified by the program. Each green cell within the table indicates a field

that the user must complete. For the example shown below, the user is specifying that 75% of the total overturning

demand in the Y direction will be resisted by system GM1 (more specifically, its sub-system 1-0), and the remaining 25%

will be carried by system GM2 (sub-system 2-0) instead. In the X direction, 40% of the overturning moment will be carried

by GM0, while the remaining 60% will be equally split between systems GM1 (sub-system 1-1) and GM2 (sub-system 21) . Different proportions could be specified by the designer as desired, with the only requirement being that the sum of

the beta values adds to 100% in each direction.

The user should note as well that the current version of the software does not save the global strength proportion values

and, thus, if the file is closed, it will be necessary to introduce them again.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 41 of 93

With the strength assignments made, the designer can proceed to the Run Design module.

Final Strength Proportions

The final proportion of the total design overturning moment that each individual plastic hinge will resist is finally

calculated by the software as:

proportions.

can make reference either to the user-defined or the automatically calculated strength

With the strength assignments made, the designer can proceed to the Run Design module.

Role of Strength Proportions in Structural Response

The first of the following figures illustrates the relationship between the assigned strength proportions and the storey

shear profile for the case of a simple frame. From the point of view of the statics of the problem, it can be observed that

the overturning moment caused by seismic forces is resisted by the plastic hinges at the columns base and the couple

generated by the axial forces in the columns. The latter are the consequence of the shear forces developed in the beams,

which are directly associated to the moment capacity of the plastic hinges. Contraflexure points are assumed at the

columns mid-height for all columns, except at the ground floor, in which the contraflexure height ratio (

) is dictated

by the assumed strength distribution. If

is the summation of beta values at ground floor, is the summation at the

first level of beams, and so on, the contraflexure height of the ground columns can be determined from the following

equation:

Understanding the relationship between the assigned strength proportions and the storey shear profile is particularly

important for frame-wall systems, due to the fact that the strength proportions and distribution in height assigned to the

frames determines those of the shear walls, which define the contraflexure height and, thus, the displacement profile. As

opposed to the case of the simple frames, the distribution is not carried out assuming a specific contraflexure height but

splitting the summation of the beams moments at a certain node in equal halves, each of which is carried by the bottom

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 42 of 93

of the column above and the top of the column below the beam level. The second of the following figures illustrates this

situation. In this case, the contraflexure height ratio at the ground floor (

If the user encounters seemingly incoherent results after running an analysis for a frame-wall system, revision of the

assigned strength proportions is highly recommended.

Run Design

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 43 of 93

Run Design

The Run Design module within the Processor Phase is simply used to instruct the program to perform the Direct

displacement-based design calculations. To do this, ensure that you have completed the Design Case and set the design

strength proportions within the Processor phase of the program. Then select the Run Design module and click on the

button Run. A message box will then appear, such as that shown below, in which the design base shear obtained for the

global X and Y directions is reported.

The design base shear values may be useful for designers who wish to quickly gauge the impact of different member

dimensions, design strength proportions, or other input data on the required system strength. For more detailed design

results, users should proceed to the Post-Processor phase of the program.

Structural Solvers

Structural Solvers

The algorithms within the software follow the equations and procedures developed by numerous researchers for the

different structural types. However, the DDBD method is still under development, and thus the software relies as well on

reasonable assumptions that have not been fully tested yet. The purpose of this chapter is to present the main points the

user needs to bear in mind when interpreting the results obtained.

General

General

The current version of the software does not account for higher mode effects. It does not take into consideration either

the amplification of displacements due to three-dimensional torsion. Future versions of DBDsoft will address these issues.

Iteration Process to Satisfy Performance Criteria

The verification of performance criteria is carried out by means of an iterative process. The design drift used to start the

iteration process in each direction is defined as follows:

If only one criterion of the type Maximum-Storey-Drift is specified, the software will take the corresponding

drift limit as the design drift and no further iteration will be required.

If only one criterion of the type Storey-Drift-Limit (i.e. a storey-by-storey limit) is specified, and the structure

consists only of walls in the direction under analysis, the drift limit specified for the top floor will be considered to

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 44 of 93

be the design drift, for the critical drift of pure cantilever wall systems occurs at the top of the wall. However, it might

occur that other values of drift limit are specified at other storeys, and that these are not satisfied when using the

one specified at the top floor as the starting value and, in these cases, iteration will be necessary.

If only one criterion of the type Storey-Drift-Limit (i.e. a storey-by-storey limit) is specified, and the structure

consists only of frames in the direction under analysis, the drift limit specified for the bottom floor will be

considered to be the design drift, for the critical drift of a pure frame system occurs at its bottom. However, it

might occur that other values of drift limit are specified at other storeys, and that these are not satisfied when

using the one specified at the bottom as the starting value and, in these cases, iteration will be necessary.

If only one criterion of the type Storey-Drift-Limit (i.e. a storey-by-storey limit) is specified, and the structure

consists of a frame-wall system in the direction under analysis, the maximum drift limit at any storey will be

considered to be the design drift, given the fact that the location of the critical drift is unknown until after the

determination of the contraflexure height of the system. The maximum is chosen to guarantee that the

verification of the criteria does not yield a positive result for storey drifts much lower than those specified by the

user. Iteration will most probably be required.

If more than one criterion is specified, the software will determine a design drift from each criterion as described

before, and will then take the minimum among all criteria as the value to start the design process.

If Section Curvature performance criteria are defined, the software will need to compute the yield curvature of the

elements defined in the model. Empirical expressions developed by several authors have been compiled and presented as

Annex 1 of the DBD12 Model Code. Those currently used by DBDsoft are:

Rectangular concrete walls:

Rectangular concrete columns:

Circular concrete columns:

Rectangular concrete beams:

T-shaped concrete beams:

IPE and HE steel sections:

in which is the yield strain of the reinforcement, , and are the walls, columns and beams dimension,

perpendicular to the axis around which the yield curvature is being calculated, respectively, and is the sections

diameter.

Note that the expression used for T-shaped concrete beams assumes the occurrence of strain-hardening. Note as well

that no expression is provided in DBD12 for rectangular concrete beams, and thus the same expression provided for Tshaped concrete sections is assumed, for it will be typical that some contribution from the slab can be accounted for.

Response Spectrum Modification Factor

The response spectrum modification factor

is computed as a function of the equivalent viscous damping of the

structural system, according to the equation suggested by the DBD12 Model Code for use with the expressions for the

calculation of the equivalent viscous damping specified in the Code as well, as shown:

Note that the previous equation is applicable for sites where near-field effects are not expected. As mentioned here, the

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 45 of 93

current version of DBDsoft does not yet account for near-field effects.

DBDsoft automatically assumes that the input spectrum will correspond to a 5% elastic damping in the case of reinforced

concrete structures, and 3% elastic damping, in the case of steel frames. For this reason, the response spectrum

modification factor is modified, for the latter case, by multiplying

by a correction factor proposed by Pennucci et al.

[2011], which is a function of the elastic damping ( = 3%) and the ductility demand of the system (

):

Note that, for steel frames, the response spectrum modification factor reported in the Post-Processor module

corresponds to the final product of

and .

Determination of the Structures Effective Period and Base Shear

The structures effective period is determined from the values introduced for the corner period and the spectral

displacement at the corner period defined by the user in the Applied Loads section, as:

(1)

In the previous equation,

is the corner period,

is the spectral displacement at the corner period for the structures

level of equivalent viscous damping (i.e. the spectral displacement at the corner period for 5% damping introduced by the

user, reduced by the response spectrum modification factor), and

is the structures design characteristic displacement.

If the effective period is larger than , the software sets an upper limit to the effective stiffness, according to DBD12:

(2)

The base shear is computed as described here, simply as the product of the design displacement (

effective stiffness ( ).

After this first design base shear has been calculated and distributed up the height of the building, a P-Delta stability

coefficient is calculated for each storey, as recommended in the DBD12 Model Code, using the following formula:

(3)

In the formula above, P j is the vertical load applied at each level, the summation of Pj from j=i to j=n implies that the total

axial load at level i is being calculated, and Vdi is the design shear force at level i. The largest storey P-Delta stability

coefficient is taken as the coefficient for the whole structure, which is confronted with pre-established limits. If the

stability coefficient is greater than 0.05 (for steel structures) or 0.10 (for concrete structures), the design base shear is

increased in a quantity given by:

(4)

In the formula above, the additional base shear is directly proportional to the summation of second-order moments

generated by the displacement of the application points of all vertical loads due to the lateral deformation of the

structure. As specified in DBD12, constant C is 0.5 for concrete structures and structures characterized by relatively

thinner hysteretic loops (e.g. Takeda, Flag-Shape, etc), and 1.0 for steel structures and structures characterized by

relatively thicker hysteretic loops (such as bi-linear, elasto-plastic, Ramber-Osgood, etc).

The final design base shear is, thus:

(5)

An upper limit of 0.30 is imposed to the P-Delta stability coefficient, with the aim of reducing the probability of dynamic

instability. When the stability coefficient is larger than 0.30, a warning message is shown to the users, and the

corresponding values of the output are highlighted:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 46 of 93

Please note that, even though a stability coefficient larger than 0.30 implies that an adjustment in design is required, the

software still computes all the design parameters as usual.

Determination of Elements Flexural and Shear Design Strength

Internal forces distribution is carried out by multiplying the strength proportion ( ) values and the overturning moment

caused by the distribution in height of the base shear force, carried out as explained in Background. Nominal strength

values are calculated taking into account each elements ductility demand, as explained in Beams Details and Columns

Details. It is noted that current version of DBD soft does not implement capacity design principles and, thus, this should be

applied separately by the designer.

Frame Systems

Frame Systems

Overview

DBDsoft carries out the design of frame systems according to DBD12, with no special considerations except those

concerning the calculation of the systems equivalent viscous damping, as described next. The design displacement profile

is assumed to follow Equation 6.2 of the code, transcribed below:

(1)

Each storeys yield drift ( ) is calculated as a weighted average of each individual beam end with respect to its relative

contribution to the overturning resistance of that storey, as shown in the following equation.

is the beta value of

plastic hinge j in storey i, and

its associated yield drift.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 47 of 93

(2)

The individual beams yield drift is estimated from the expressions developed by Priestley [1998]:

Reinforced concrete frames:

(3)

Steel frames:

(4)

Each storeys ductility demand ( ) is then calculated as the ratio of that storeys design drift ( ) and its yield drift

calculated as per Equation 2. The systems equivalent ductility demand (

) is calculated by weighting each storeys

ductility demand with respect to the design storey shear and storey drift, as:

(5)

The equivalent viscous damping of the frame system is finally calculated as:

Reinforced concrete frames:

Steel frames:

(6)

(7)

Please note that the current version of DBDsoft only allows for steel beams and columns to be defined with their local

axes oriented parallel and perpendicular to the global axes. Defining steel beams and columns with other angles will lead

to the bending strength capacity of the sections to be estimated as zero. Future versions of the software will allow for

steel sections to be defined with any desired orientation.

Wall Systems

Wall Systems

Design Displacement Profile

DBDsoft carries out the design of cantilever wall systems according to DBD12, using the approximate method of Priestley

et al (2007), in which the design displacement profile is assumed to result from the summation of an elastic deformation

profile and a rigid-body rotation about the base, due to the development of a plastic hinge. The elastic curvature profile is

assumed to vary linearly from the yield curvature at the base to zero at the roof level. It is noted that this method is valid

for walls with aspect ratios (i.e. ratio of total height to length) greater than or equal to 3.0, for it ignores the contribution

of shear deformations to the shape of the displacement profile.

(1)

(2)

(3)

is the yield curvature of the longest wall, since the strain in it will be determinant for the

whole system. For rectangular concrete walls it can be estimated, as recommended by Priestley et al (2007), from

Equation 4, as a function of the reinforcements yield strain ( ) and the walls length ( ).

(4)

is computed from Equations 5 to 7, unless a section curvature criterion has been specified for

the longest wall with a user-defined plastic hinge length. For the calculation of the penetration depth ( ), 20 mm

diameter ( ) reinforcement bars are assumed if no bar diameter has been specified as a part of a section curvature

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 48 of 93

criterion.

(5)

(6)

(7)

The yield displacement of each wall is calculated by replacing in Equation 3 with the equivalent SDOF systems

equivalent height

. Afterwards, each walls ductility demand is computed as the ratio between the systems

characteristic displacement and its yield displacement. Each walls equivalent damping is then calculated by means of

Equation 9, and the systems equivalent viscous damping is finally obtained as the weighted average of all walls acting in

the same direction with respect to their strength proportions.

(8)

(9)

The nominal moment demand at the base of the walls is calculated as a function of the design displacement ( , resulting

from the product of the total overturning moment and the strength proportion

assigned to the walls base), the

displacement ductility demand (

(for

(10)

It should be noted that a precise definition of the required nominal strength of the walls at their base should stem from

the corresponding moment-curvature analyses of the sections, and that the value calculated as per the above equation

should be considered only as indicative.

Frame-Wall Systems

Frame-Wall Systems

As opposed to the case of pure frame systems, the user has the possibility of specifying any desired strength distribution.

Given the fact that any difference between the design shear profile and the actual distribution of strength specified by the

users will be carried by the walls, the use of constant beam strengths along the height comes up as an appealing option

that certainly eases the construction process. Furthermore, it is possible to obtain a constant shear profile in the frames at

all levels by designing beams at all levels for equal strength except at roof level, where the beam strength should be

reduced by half, and by allocating that same strength proportion of the roof beams to the plastic hinges at the base of the

columns. Even though this option is recommended, the user has effective freedom to choose the desired shear profile in

the frames. For this reason, if the Auto-Betas function is used for a Frame-Wall system (either with or without link beams),

the automatic betas proposed by the software are only based on the estimation of members strength based on the

dimensions and materials of the sections defined by the user, and do not account for the expected design shear profile, as

described here.

Link Beams

Frames and walls may or may not be connected by moment-transferring beams. DBDsoft recognizes a series of ways of

connecting beams to a wall, which account for different possible geometries.

Three cases can be found when rigid links are not used to connect the beam and the wall. If the smallest angle between

them is less than 15, rigid links are needed. If the angle is between 75 and 90, the wall is considered to be

perpendicular to the beam and thus there is no frame-wall system in the direction of the beam. If the angle lies between

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 49 of 93

15 and 75, the software considers that the two elements define a frame-wall system and the beam is a link beam (unless

released at both ends). The following figures illustrate these three cases:

If the beam and the wall are connected by a rigid link, the software considers the existence of a frame-wall system only if

the smallest relative angle between them is less than 75, as shown in the figures below:

The software recognizes up to two aligned rigid links connecting a beam and a wall, as exemplified in the figure below:

When link beams are specified, the software automatically computes their additional contribution to resisting the

overturning moment, as explained here. The software allows for each end of a link beam to be connected to more than

one shear wall. The proportion of moment transmitted from the beams plastic hinge to each connected wall is

determined from the relative estimated strengths of the walls.

Strength Proportions

As described here, strength proportions play a very significant role in the displacement-based design of structures. For

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 50 of 93

this reason, it is relevant to recall the way the software handles this information and summarizes the whole distribution of

strength into fewer parameters:

: the proportion of overturning moment taken by the plastic hinges at the base of the walls, in a given

direction. The walls can be either isolated or connected by link beams to a frame:

(1)

: the proportion of overturning moment taken by the plastic hinges at the base of the columns and at the

(non-link) beams, in a given direction.

(2)

: the proportion of overturning moment taken by the plastic hinges at the link beams, in a given direction.

Note that, if link beams exist, the plastic hinge connected to a frames column counts as contributing to

the plastic hinge connected to a wall contributes to

, while

As the design displacement profile of frame-wall systems depends on the contraflexure height (Sullivan et al. 2006) and

this, in turn, depends on the profile of the storey shear to be carried by the walls and thus the systems shear profile as a

whole, an iterative approach needs to be followed. The software starts by estimating the contraflexure height (

) by

means of equation 6.8 of DBD12, transcribed below as Equations 3 and 4, which should actually be applied only for the

case of constant frame shear along the frames height, but is used for all cases as a starting point.

if

(3)

If

In the above equations,

(4)

Sullivan et al. (2006) have proposed expressions to describe the displacement profile of frame-wall systems in which the

walls carry a greater proportion of the total overturning moment than the walls. In order to be able to cover all the

possible strength proportions, Nievas and Sullivan (2014) carried out a preliminary evaluation of a proposal to combine

the displacement profiles developed earlier by Sullivan et al. (2006) with that of a pure frame. This proposal is currently

implemented in DBDsoft, even though the user is warned that it has not been sufficiently tested yet to guarantee its

performance. Structural systems in which the walls carry very little of the total overturning moment seem to deform

almost as pure frames, and thus impose very high rotational demands to the bases of the walls. It is recommended that

the designer pays special attention to this and verifies extensively the walls ductility capacity with a well-detailed

moment-curvature analysis.

Depending on the contraflexure height ratio, the design displacement profile is determined in different ways:

: the traditional profile proposed by Sullivan et al. (2006) is used. The influence of the walls is

significant and, therefore, the displacement profile is mostly determined by the walls according to article 6.4 of

DBD12, with the equations transcribed herein. All considerations regarding walls yield curvatures, the plastic

hinge length and the strain penetration length described for the case of cantilever walls systems are applicable.

(5)

(6)

for

(7)

for

(8)

: The frames are stronger than the walls. A hybrid displaced shape is used for design: for

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 51 of 93

heights below the inflexion point, the walls profile is used (Equation 7 above), while for the rest of the building the

displacements are calculated as for the case of a pure frame, starting from the inflexion point, as shown in

Equation 9. The first storey height is taken as the average storey height of the storeys above the inflexion height.

The yield profile shown in the Post-Processor module corresponds to the walls (calculated as per Equations 7 and

8 above).

(9)

It is clear that, in the extreme case in which the frames take 100% of the overturning moment and the walls take

0%, the contraflexure height is equal to zero, and the displacement profile reduces to that of a pure frame.

: The walls become less influential as the frames take a greater percentage of the

overturning moment, but still participate enough for the behaviour to be different from the case above. A

combined profile is used:

(10)

(11)

(12)

where i,ls CL and i,ls CQ are the profiles corresponding to

and

, respectively, and

The longest (assumed to be the stiffest) wall is used to determine the yield curvature at the wall base to be used for the

calculation of the displaced shape, as well as the contraflexure height. If the model contains more than one wall with the

same length in a certain direction, and these turn out to be the longest walls, the software calculates the contraflexure

height of the system as the weighted average of the contraflexure heights of these individual walls with respect to the

proportion of overturning moment each of them is expected to carry. This procedure is relevant in the case that some of

the walls are connected to link beams while others are not, a situation that leads to walls of the same length having

different contraflexure heights.

The iterative process followed is described in the following figure. The iteration process is controlled by a convergence

check based on the ratio of the contraflexure height calculated at a certain step and the contraflexure height obtained in

the previous step, as well as a limit set to the maximum number of iteration steps to be carried out. Given the fact that

small errors in the determination of the contraflexure height do not affect results significantly, the tolerance is currently

set to 0.10%. Once the convergence criterion has been met, ductility demands and equivalent viscous damping are

computed independently for frames and walls (as described earlier in the respective sections), and the final overall

viscous damping of the frame system is obtained as a weighted average (Equation 13). The software then proceeds with

the calculation of the base shear and overturning moment demands, and the calculation of the members required

strengths.

(13)

It is noted that for the case of frame-wall systems in which link beams are present, the yield drift of the end of the link

beam connected to the wall is calculated as suggested by Sullivan et al. [2006] as:

(14)

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 52 of 93

The nominal moment demand at the base of the walls is calculated as shown here.

Coupled Walls Systems

Coupled-Walls Systems

The current version of DBDsoft does not support coupled-wall systems. Corresponding solvers will be developed for

future versions.

Capacity Design

Capacity Design

In order for the plastic hinges to develop at the intended locations, appropriate capacity design principles need to be

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 53 of 93

applied in order to ensure that elements meant to remain elastic during seismic excitation are able to sustain the forces

induced in them, taking into account the possibility of increased material strength in the plastic hinges and higher mode

amplification of actions.

The DBD12 Model Code suggests that capacity design moments and shears can be obtained by means of non-linear time

history analyses, the effective modal superposition method or using a simplified approximate method. Further, several

authors have published alternative approaches in the recent years, as more is understood with respect to the effect of

higher modes on structures that behave inelastically.

Currently, DBDsoft determines the capacity design moments and shears in columns and walls following the approximate

method described in DBD12. Alternative methods will be included in upcoming versions.

Previous Top Next

General

Conceptually, capacity design moments and shears are determined by amplifying the design actions by means of an

overstrength factor and a dynamic amplification factor.

The overstrength factor takes into account the possibility that plastic hinges possess strength higher than calculated due

to many factors, such as a higher strength of the materials or strain hardening. It should normally be established based on

a moment-curvature analysis of members using their maximum feasible strength levels. Clearly, this means that different

overstrength factors could be specified for the capacity design of different members in the structure, but DBD12 suggests

that one single approximate value may be used. The current version of DBDsoft allows the user to specify this value in the

Design Case tab of the Processor area, as described here. The default value is 1.30.

The dynamic amplification factor represents the increase in the expected storey shear forces due to the effect of higher

modes. It is relevant here to recall that higher modes tend to have a bigger influence on the forces generated within a

structure than on its displacements and that, as the design actions in members are determined from a first mode

deformed shape, this increase in forces needs to be accounted for separately.

n order for the plastic hinges to develop at the intended locations, appropriate capacity design principles need to be

applied in order to ensure that elements meant to remain elastic during seismic excitation are able to sustain the forces

induced in them, taking into account the possibility of increased material strength in the plastic hinges and higher mode

amplification of actions.

Capacity Design of RC Walls

The envelope of capacity moments for walls is approximated by a bilinear curve, defined by the moment at the base (M o

base) and the

moment at mid-height (M o MH). The first is simply the product of the overstrength factor (

) defined by the

user in the Processor area and the design moment at the base of the wall (resulting from the product of the total

overturning moment and the strength proportion

assigned to the walls base). The moment at mid-height is

calculated as:

(1)

(2)

In the last equation, Ti is the initial elastic period, including the effects of cracking, and is estimated from the effective

period and displacement ductility demand of the structure (determined from the DDBD process) as:

(3)

The profile of capacity moments along the height of the wall is similar to:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 54 of 93

If the wall is part of a frame wall system in which the frames carry more than 20% of the total overturning moment, the

capacity moment at mid-height should be confronted against 1.2 times the mid-height moment due to first mode

response, and the largest of the two should be taken as the final value.

It is relevant to notice that the moment at the base (Mo base) used herein to define the envelope of capacity moments

along the height of the walls is larger than the nominal moment demand at the base calculated as described here. The

latter is the nominal yield capacity of the walls base, which can actually end up being higher during seismic excitations

that induce inelastic behaviour, due to strain hardening and other sources of overstrength. As shown by Priestley and

Amaris (2002), the maximum moments developed along the height of the walls are usually smaller than the plastic hinge

at the base, or exceptionally equal, when the walls are subject to non-linear time-history analyses for intensities up to

double of the design one. It is therefore relevant that the designer analyses the (approximate) nominal required strength

and the envelope of capacity moments critically, so as to make a conscious decision with respect to the reinforcement to

provide. The plot shown in the Walls Capacity Moments tab of the Post-Processor can be particularly useful for this

purpose.

The capacity design shear strength of the wall shall conform to the following envelope:

The required shear strength at the base (Vo base) is calculated as:

(4)

If the seismic resistant system in the direction under study only consists on walls, or if the wall is part of a frame-wall

system in which the frames carry less than 20% of the total overturning moment, the dynamic amplification factor for

shear forces at the base is calculated as:

(5)

(6)

If the wall is part of a frame-wall system in which the frames carry more than 20% of the total overturning moment, the

dynamic amplification factor for shear forces at the base is calculated as:

(7)

(8)

If the seismic resistant system in the direction under study only consists on walls, or if the wall is part of a frame-wall

system in which the frames carry less than 20% of the total overturning moment, the required shear strength at the top of

the wall is calculated as:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 55 of 93

(9)

If the wall is part of a frame-wall system in which the frames carry more than 20% of the total overturning moment, the

required shear strength at the top of the wall is calculated as:

(10)

Capacity Design of Columns

The capacity moments of columns (

) as:

(1)

If the columns are part of a frame-wall system in which the frames carry less than 60% of the total overturning moment,

the dynamic amplification factor ( ) is simply taken as 1.30. If the columns are part of a pure frame system, or part of a

frame-wall system in which the frames carry more than 60% of the total overturning moment, the dynamic amplification

factor (

(2)

The required dependable shear strength of columns is determined as:

(3)

where

st

element, is the seismic design shear force associated with 1 mode response,

is the seismic design shear force

at the base of the columns (ground/foundation level) associated with 1 st mode response, and

and

are the

design moment at the top and bottom of the column, respectively, associated with the overstrength of adjoining beams

(i.e. moments determined as per equation (1)).

It should be noted that the current version of DBDsoft does not carry out the verification/design of the sections proposed

by the users. This is particularly relevant for the capacity design of columns if the provided sectional strength is actually

larger than the required one, as this should be taken into account in the definition of the dependable required strength.

The user should take this into consideration when defining the overstrength factor (see here).

The strength provided at the base of the columns should be such that the plastic hinges form at the intended moment

demand (i.e. moment strength at the base of the columns should not be increased as for the rest of the columns height).

The nominal moment demand at the base of the columns is approximately calculated as a function of the design moment

( , resulting from the product of the total overturning moment and the corresponding strength proportion

), the displacement ductility demand (

assumed). In order to determine the displacement ductility demand, the storey drift that causes the columns to yield is

estimated as:

(4)

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

where

Page 56 of 93

is the columns yield curvature (around the relevant axis) and

(5)

where

The nominal moment demand at the base of the columns is estimated as:

(for

(6)

It should be noted that a precise definition of the required nominal strength of the columns at their base should stem

from the corresponding moment-curvature analyses of the sections, and that the value calculated as per the above

equation should be considered only as indicative.

The DBD12 Model Code provides some guidance with respect to the capacity design of columns whose response is biaxial.

However, the current version of DBDsoft treats design in the two perpendicular directions X and Y independently, and

combination of actions in these two directions shall be carried out by the designer.

Capacity Design of Beams

Currently, DBDsoft does not yet provide capacity design shear actions for beams, but future versions will.

Post-Processor

Post_Processor

The Post-Processor phase includes options to view results graphically or in table format, just by selecting the

corresponding option, as shown in the figure below. To view results graphically select the option named 3D View. To

view the tabulated results and graphs, select the option Sheets and Graphs.

Selecting the 3D View, the user can observe the structure in its deformed shape at development of the critical

performance criterion, as well as bending moments and shear plots for all the structural members.

While viewing the results through the Sheets and Graphs option, the user can manually select parts of the output tables

and copy (Ctrl + C) and paste (Ctrl + V) them in any external application. It is also possible to use the Copy Sheet To

Clipboard button, which copies the whole active tab. Note that the Save To Excel option is not yet available in the

current version of the software.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 57 of 93

The following table shows all the different kinds of output that are shown in the different tabs of the Post-Processor

module when the Sheets and Graphs option is selected. Some of them are available only for certain structural types, as

specified:

The results within each of this output forms is described in the sub-sections that follow. It is noted that the output of a

certain design run are not saved by the software, and are thus lost upon closing of the file.

Displacements

Displacements

The Displacements tab shows the design displacements

that controls the design.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 58 of 93

The format of the plots shown in the Storey Shear tab varies depending on the type of structure in each direction.

When the system consists of only frames or only walls, the plot shows the storey shear carried by each vertical system

(column or wall). The labels contain the user-defined name of the base element of the vertical system, as shown on the

plot on the left of the following example. It is noted that if two vertical systems are carrying exactly the same proportion

of the total storey shear in each storey, the lines corresponding to both systems will overlap and the user will only be able

to see one of them.

When the structure is a frame-wall system, the plot shows the storey shear carried by the frames (i.e. the columns that

make up the frames) and that carried by the walls, as shown on the plot on the right of the following example.

In both cases, the global storey shear is shown as well.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 59 of 93

Just as for the case of the Storey Shear Graph, the format of the plots shown in the Storey Moments tab varies depending

on the type of structure in each direction.

When the system consists of only frames or only walls, the plot simply shows the global moment.

When the structure is a frame-wall system, besides showing the global moment, the plot illustrates the moment carried

by each wall and by the frames (as a whole). It is noted that if two different walls are carrying exactly the same proportion

of the total storey shear in each storey, the lines corresponding to both systems will overlap and the user will only be able

to see one of them.

These plots show the capacity moments profiles (calculated as indicated here) and the nominal base moment (calculated

as indicated here) for each wall in the structure. Each wall is identified by the user-defined name of its base element.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 60 of 93

These plots show the capacity shear profiles (calculated as indicated here) for each wall in the structure. Each wall is

identified by the user-defined name of its base element.

These plots show the sum of the capacity moments profiles of all the columns (calculated as indicated here) along the

height of the structure, in each direction.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Results Tab

Page 61 of 93

Results Tab

The Results module within the Post-Processor Phase presents the results of the DDBD calculations made by the program.

A screenshot of a typical results table is annotated below:

By scrolling down the table using the arrows on the right, one can see the total system design base shear and overturning

moment (see figure below). Note that these values already include the additional base shear due to P-Delta

considerations.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 62 of 93

If the maximum P-Delta stability coefficient is larger than 0.30, a warning message appears, as shown below. However,

the total design base shear and overturning moment are still calculated.

Results for the perpendicular (Y) design direction are shown further down the table as well.

If the structural system in a certain direction is made only of frames, the Results module shows each storeys

displacement ductility demand as well.

Beams Details

Beams Details

This table contains the design ( , ) and nominal (

direction (X and Y) are shown in independent tabs.

) moments and shear forces for the beams. Results for each

is the moment required for the system to be in equilibrium when subjected to its design

deformation limit state. The nominal moment

results from combining the design moment with the effects of the

displacement ductility demand ( ) and post-yield stiffness ratio (r factor), and it is the value with which sizing of the

longitudinal reinforcement needs to be carried out, in order to provide the storey shear stiffness required by design. It is

calculated as:

for

for

Clearly, the displacement ductility demand ( ) is calculated as the ratio between the design storey drift (shown in the

column in the table) and the yield storey drift corresponding to each beam.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Columns Details

Page 63 of 93

Columns Details

This table contains the columns design moments that equilibrate the design moments (

corresponding design shear ( ) and seismic axial force demands. It also contains the columns nominal and capacity

moments ( ) and shear ( ), calculated as described here.

The table also shows the ratio of the contraflexure height with respect to the total height of the column, for each column.

Results for each direction (X and Y) are shown in independent tabs.

It is noted that the current version of the software does not calculate the demands in columns working out of the plane of

the frame, as shown in the figure below:

Walls Details

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 64 of 93

Walls Results

This table contains the walls moments ( ) at the design deformation limit state, as well as their corresponding design

shear demands. It also shows the nominal moment demand ( ) at the base, and the capacity moments and shear forces

along the height, calculated as described here. For the case of frame-wall systems in which the walls are connected to the

frames by means of link beams, the table shows the axial force demands in the walls as well.

The table also shows the ratio of the contraflexure height with respect to the total height of the wall, for each element

that makes up the wall. Note that structural systems made up only of cantilever walls do not present a contraflexure

point, while walls that are part of frame-wall systems present one contraflexure point along their height. In the example

below, the contraflexure point is located at 0.86 times the height of elements W4/W14.

Results for each direction (X and Y) are shown in independent tabs.

It is noted that the current version of the software does not calculate the demands in walls working out of plane, as

shown in the figure below:

This tab shows a summary of the required moments and main properties of all the walls present in the model. Each wall is

identified by the user-defined name of its base element. Final strength proportions (

) are shown for each direction (

and

and

). Yield curvatures (calculated as indicated here) and displacement ductility demands in both directions (

) are shown as well.

The required strengths shown are simply the product of the final strength proportion and the total overturning moment

in each direction. The nominal strengths are calculated as indicated here.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 65 of 93

Final Betas

Final Betas

This tab shows a summary of the local (

) and final (

Design Process

Design Process

These tabs show how the iteration process to satisfy performance criteria has been carried out. The table shows the

criteria defined by the user, as well as the values obtained by the software at each iteration step. Values marked in red do

not satisfy the specified criterion. For details regarding the iteration process, please refer to Iteration Process to Satisfy

Performance Criteria.

Results for each direction (X and Y) are shown in independent tabs.

It is noted that the maximum drifts obtained by the software might, in some cases, be smaller than the limits specified by

the user. One reason for this is the fact that interstorey drifts are a discrete and not a continuous function of the

buildings height, so their values represent the secant slope of the displaced shape instead of the tangent slope. Another

possible reason is the dominance of the walls material strain limits over user-specified drift limits (please refer here and

here for details on the calculation of the design plastic rotation ( ) for wall and frame-wall systems, respectively). The

user can check if this is the case by taking a look at the tab Other, as shown here.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Other Results

Page 66 of 93

Other Results

The tab Other shows other various results of interest, and summarize some information regarding the design of the

structure in both directions, as shown in the figure below.

For the case of cantilever walls or frame-wall systems, the table presents the design plastic rotation ( ), and states

whether this value is governed by the walls material strain limits or the user-defined maximum interstorey drift

(indicated as Code Drift in the table).

The software has been developed with a number of 3D plotting options. To view these options, click on any one of the

three square buttons located on the right of the screen (see below). Note that the 3D plotting options can also be

accessed from the main drop-down menu of the program.

The plot menus that are revealed (see figure below) include options that permit the user to change the view, select

between solid, wireframe or shaded elements, show node or element names, change the colour scheme, show the base

grid, and scale the deformed shape, among others.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 67 of 93

The user can also select to plot the bending moment or shear diagrams over the structure, and for them to be shown for

all elements or only for beams, columns or walls, in X, Y or both directions simultaneously. The scale of the bending

moment and shear diagrams can be changed with the corresponding control as well.

Note that the perspective view of the structural model can be changed with a left-click drag of the mouse. The view can

also be moved in a translation motion with a right-click drag.

Examples

Examples

As mentioned here, four example files are provided. This chapter provides step-by-step hand calculations for those

example buildings that the user can easily compare to the results obtained with the software. The example files can be

opened by clicking on File --> Test Cases and selecting the corresponding example file, as shown below:

Test B1

Example Test B1

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 68 of 93

Description

Value

Units

600

ton/storey

Number of storeys

[-]

Interstorey height

3.0

[m]

f'ce

30

[Mpa]

fye

500

[Mpa]

fue

600

[Mpa]

Es

205000

[Mpa]

Limit Drift

2.0

[%]

Parameter

Value

Units

Corner Displacement

1.03

Corner Period

6.0

sec

Elastic Damping

5.0

PGA

0.4

Step-by-step calculations

For the case of Wall 3, the projected length along each global axis (X and Y) is used:

Element

Yield Curvature

Limit Curvature

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 69 of 93

X

Ltot

Lx

Ly

Wall 1

0.00061

0.00900

Wall 2

0.00122

0.01800

Wall 3

0.00143

0.00113

0.02118

0.01674

3.4

4.3

Hence, the final design plastic rotation is controlled by the maximum code drift of 2% in both directions:

In X:

H + Lsp

Mass

(m)

(T)

24

24.22

21

18

y,i (m)

d,i (m)

mi.i

mii2

mi ihi

600

0.119

0.414

248.3

102.7

5958.9

21.22

600

0.097

0.354

212.4

75.2

4459.4

18.22

600

0.076

0.295

176.8

52.1

3182.9

15

15.22

600

0.056

0.237

142.1

33.7

2131.8

12

12.22

600

0.038

0.181

108.6

19.7

1303.6

9.22

600

0.023

0.128

76.8

9.8

691.0

6.22

600

0.011

0.078

47.0

3.7

281.8

3.22

600

0.003

0.033

19.6

0.6

58.8

0.22

0.000

0.000

0.0

0.0

0.0

1031.6

297.5

18068.3

Storey

hi (m)

Total

4800

In Y:

H + Lsp

Mass

(m)

(T)

24

24.22

21

18

5

4

y,i (m)

d,i (m)

mi.i

mii2

miihi

600

0.222

0.369

221.4

81.7

5313.3

21.22

600

0.181

0.309

185.5

57.4

3895.8

18.22

600

0.141

0.251

150.4

37.7

2707.2

15

15.22

600

0.104

0.195

116.8

22.7

1752.0

12

12.22

600

0.070

0.142

85.5

12.2

1025.8

Storey

hi (m)

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 70 of 93

3

9.22

600

0.042

0.095

57.2

5.5

514.8

6.22

600

0.020

0.055

32.7

1.8

196.2

3.22

600

0.006

0.021

12.8

0.3

38.3

0.22

0.000

0.000

Total

4800

0.0

0.0

0.0

862.3

219.2

15443.4

Characteristic displacement:

Effective height:

Effective mass:

Each wall's yield displacement is calculated as:

Wall 1 (X):

Wall 2 (Y):

Wall 3 (X):

Wall 3 (Y):

Each wall's ductility demand:

Wall 1 (X):

Wall 2 (Y):

Wall 3 (X):

Wall 3 (Y):

Each wall's equivalent viscous damping:

Wall 1 (X):

Wall 2 (Y):

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 71 of 93

Wall 3 (X):

Wall 3 (Y):

We make the decision of distributing the base shear (and overturning moment) in each direction in the following way:

Direction X: 75% for Wall 1, 25% for Wall 3

Direction Y: 50% for Wall 2, 50% for Wall 3

In this way, we calculate the equivalent viscous damping of the system as:

In X:

In Y:

The design spectrum reduction factors are calculated as

In X:

In Y:

Effective period:

In X:

In Y:

Required effective stiffness:

In X:

In Y:

Design base shear (no P-Delta amplification verified or accounted for yet):

In X:

In Y:

Calculation of the P-Delta stability coefficient for each storey:

The vertical load at each storey is the product of the cumulative mass and the acceleration of gravity. The design storey

shear is equal to the proportion of storey shear with respect to the base shear (Vi/Vb) and the base shear calculated

above.

In Y, the maximum P-Delta stability coefficient (0.064) is smaller than the 0.10 limit for concrete structures, and thus the

final design base shear is the same as calculated before.

In X, the maximum P-Delta stability coefficient (0.104) exceeds the 0.10 limit for concrete structures, and thus the design

base shear is increased by the following quantity:

For concrete, C = 0.50. The additional base shear in direction X is 289 kN, as shown in the table below.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 72 of 93

Direction X:

Level

hi (m)

d,i

Mass

(t)

24

0.414

0.020

21

0.354

0.020

18

0.295

15

0.237

12

3

2

1

Vi,x/Vb

Vdi

P-

VP-,i

600

600

0.241

1474

0.080

70

600

1200

0.447

2735

0.085

59

0.019

600

1800

0.618

3785

0.090

50

0.019

600

2400

0.756

4629

0.095

40

0.181

0.018

600

3000

0.861

5274

0.099

30

0.128

0.017

600

3600

0.935

5730

0.102

22

0.078

0.015

600

4200

0.981

6009

0.104

13

0.033

0.011

600

4800

1.000

6125

0.084

VP- -->

289

Direction Y:

Level

hi (m)

d,i

Mass

(t)

24

0.369

0.020

21

0.309

0.020

18

0.251

15

0.195

12

3

2

1

Vi,x/Vb

Vdi

P-

600

600

0.257

2106

0.056

600

1200

0.472

3872

0.059

0.019

600

1800

0.646

5303

0.062

0.017

600

2400

0.782

6414

0.064

0.142

0.016

600

3000

0.881

7227

0.064

0.095

0.014

600

3600

0.947

7771

0.062

0.055

0.011

600

4200

0.985

8083

0.056

0.021

0.007

600

4800

1.000

8204

0.041

In X:

In Y (as before):

Overturning moment at the base:

In X:

In Y:

For each wall:

Element's

Name

Wall 1

Wall 2

Wall 3

y Mwall X EQ (kNm)

0.75 0

0 0.5

0.25 0.5

84262

0

28087

Mwall Y EQ (kNm)

0

73470

73470

NOTE: The result of each step of the procedure has been presented in a rounded format, but all decimal places have

been carried throughout the calculations. This explains small differences that the user can obtain when following the

numbers by hand, if not all decimal places are used (with the aid of a spreadsheet, for example).

Test B2

Example Test B2

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 73 of 93

Description

Value

Units

600

ton/storey

Number of storeys

[-]

Interstorey height

3.0

[m]

f'ce

30

[Mpa]

fye

500

[Mpa]

fue

600

[Mpa]

Es

205000

[Mpa]

Drift Limite

2.0

[%]

Parameter

Value

Units

Corner Displacement

1.03

Corner Period

6.0

sec

Elastic Damping

5.0

PGA

0.4

Step-by-step calculations

The displacement profile is identical in both directions, and is determined from:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 74 of 93

Fi,x

Vi,x

(7)

(8)

3043

0.335

Hi (m)

d,i

Massa

mi.i

mi.i2

mi.i.hi

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

18

0.282

600

169

48

Fi,y

Vi,y

(9)

(10)

(11)

0.262

15

0.248

600

149

37

2230

0.207

0.335

0.230

0.262

12

0.209

600

125

26

1503

0.174

0.542

0.194

0.492

0.164

600

99

16

887

0.137

0.717

0.153

0.685

0.115

600

69

413

0.096

0.854

0.107

0.838

0.060

600

36

108

0.050

0.950

0.056

0.944

0.000

0.000

1.000

0.000

1.000

Tot.

646

137

8185

Effective height:

Effective mass:

For each frame, in each direction:

Frame GM0

Frame GM1

Frame GM2

Lb (m)

2.00

4.00

4.00

1.50

2.00

hb (m)

0.50

0.60

0.50

0.50

0.50

ey

0.00244

0.00244

0.00244

0.00244

0.00244

Qy (rad)

0.00488

0.00813

0.00976

0.00366

0.00488

The dimensions of beams are the same within each frame, and thus the storey yield drift of each frame directly coincides

with the storey yield drift of its beams. Yield drift values for different frames are combined taking into account the

proportion of overturning moment that each frame is designed to carry. In this example, we assume that frames GM1

and GM2 carry 70% and 30% respectively of the overturning moment in direction X, and that frames GM0, GM1, and

GM2 carry 40%, 20% and 40% respectively of the overturning moment in direction Y. As all beams are defined with the

same height, the yield drift of all storeys is the same in each direction, and it can be calculated as:

Direction X:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 75 of 93

Direction Y:

The ductility demand of the whole system, in each direction, is computed as:

Direction X:

Direction Y:

Direction X:

(rad) Vi,y / Vb

Frame GM1

Frame GM2

(rad)

Vi,y / Vb Vi,y / Vb

(rad)

(rad)

0.011

0.335

0.00813

0.7

0.00366

0.3

0.00679

1.665

0.0063

0.0038

0.013

0.542

0.00813

0.7

0.00366

0.3

0.00679

1.921

0.0136

0.0071

0.015

0.717

0.00813

0.7

0.00366

0.3

0.00679

2.178

0.0231

0.0106

0.017

0.854

0.00813

0.7

0.00366

0.3

0.00679

2.434

0.0343

0.0141

0.018

0.950

0.00813

0.7

0.00366

0.3

0.00679

2.690

0.0467

0.0173

0.020

1.000

0.00813

0.7

0.00366

0.3

0.00679

2.946

0.0589

0.0200

0.1829

0.0729

Total

Direction Y:

i

(rad) Vi,y / Vb

Frame GM0

(rad)

Frame GM1

Frame GM2

(rad)

(rad)

(rad)

Vi,y / Vb Vi,y / Vb

0.011

0.335

0.00488

0.4

0.00976

0.2

0.00488

0.4

0.00585

1.93 0.00731

0.00379

0.013

0.542

0.00488

0.4

0.00976

0.2

0.00488

0.4

0.00585

2.23 0.01575

0.00707

0.015

0.717

0.00488

0.4

0.00976

0.2

0.00488

0.4

0.00585

2.53 0.02677

0.01060

0.017

0.854

0.00488

0.4

0.00976

0.2

0.00488

0.4

0.00585

2.82 0.03982

0.01411

0.018

0.950

0.00488

0.4

0.00976

0.2

0.00488

0.4

0.00585

3.12 0.05412

0.01735

0.020

1.000

0.00488

0.4

0.00976

0.2

0.00488

0.4

0.00585

3.42 0.06833

0.02000

0.2121

0.0729

Total

In X:

In Y:

In X:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 76 of 93

In Y:

Effective period:

In X:

In Y:

In X:

In Y:

In X:

In Y:

Calculation of the P-Delta stability coefficient for each storey:

The vertical load at each storey is the product of the cumulative mass and the acceleration of gravity. The design storey

shear is equal to the proportion of storey shear with respect to the base shear (Vi/Vb) and the base shear calculated

above.

In both directions, the maximum P-Delta stability coefficient exceeds the 0.10 limit for concrete structures, and thus the

design base shear is increased by the following quantity:

The following tables contain the corresponding calculations.

Direction X:

Level

hi (m)

d,i

Mass

(t)

Vi,x/Vb

Vdi

P-

VP-,i

18

0.282

0.011

600

600

0.335

2208

0.030

65

15

0.248

0.013

600

1200

0.542

3572

0.043

58

12

0.209

0.015

600

1800

0.717

4726

0.055

49

0.164

0.017

600

2400

0.854

5629

0.069

38

0.115

0.018

600

3000

0.950

6261

0.086

27

0.060

0.020

600

3600

1.000

6591

0.107

14

VP- -->

250.436

Direction Y:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 77 of 93

Level

hi (m)

d,i

Mass

(t)

Vi,x/Vb

Vdi

P-

VP-,i

18

0.282

0.011

600

600

0.335

2092

0.032

65

15

0.248

0.013

600

1200

0.542

3385

0.045

58

12

0.209

0.015

600

1800

0.717

4477

0.058

49

0.164

0.017

600

2400

0.854

5333

0.073

38

0.115

0.018

600

3000

0.950

5932

0.091

27

0.060

0.020

600

3600

1.000

6245

0.113

14

VP- -->

250.436

In X:

In Y:

Overturning moment at the base:

In X:

In Y:

NOTE: Small numerical differences with respect to the output of the software are due to rounding of decimal places

along calculations carried out by hand.

Test B3

Example Test B3

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 78 of 93

Description

Value

Units

300

ton/storey

Number of storeys

[-]

Interstorey height

3.5

[m]

f'ce

30

[Mpa]

fye

500

[Mpa]

fue

600

[Mpa]

Es

205000

[Mpa]

Limit Drift

2.0

[%]

Parameter

Value

Units

Corner Displacement

1.03

Corner Period

6.0

sec

Elastic Damping

5.0

PGA

0.4

;

As

and

):

depend on the contraflexure height, they will vary at each iteration step.

Iteration process:

To start, the contraflexure height is estimated from:

if

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 79 of 93

if

As

for

for

At each iteration step, the contraflexure height ratio is confronted to the pre-established limits, and the corresponding

equations for the displacement profile are updated.

The following table shows the values for some of the parameters obtained at each iteration step, together with the ratio

of the newly calculated contraflexure height.

Step

Lp (m)

Ratio

H /H

H (m)

Q (rad)

CF

CF

0.5392

11.3232

1.115

0.01434

1.1877

0.6404

13.4490

1.178

0.01331

1.0048

0.6435

13.5140

1.180

0.01327

1.0001

0.6436

13.5160

1.180

0.01327

1.0000

At each iteration step, the following process is followed (shown here for the last iteration step):

1.

Computation of the yield displacement and the total design displacement as a function of the contraflexure

height obtained in the previous iteration step (13.516 m in this case), and the auxiliary columns that allow for the

final computation of:

i hi (m)

hi+Lsp (m)

mi (tn)

Dyi (m)

Ddi (m)

Qi (rad)

mi*Di

mi*Di^2

mi*Di*hi

21.00

21.275

150.00

0.112

0.387

0.02000

58.01

22.44

1218.23

17.50

17.775

150.00

0.089

0.317

0.02000

47.51

15.05

831.44

14.00

14.275

150.00

0.065

0.247

0.01991

37.01

9.13

518.15

10.50

10.775

150.00

0.042

0.177

0.01916

26.56

4.70

278.88

7.00

7.275

150.00

0.021

0.110

0.01755

16.50

1.82

115.50

3.50

3.775

150.00

0.006

0.049

0.01388

7.29

0.35

25.51

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

0

Page 80 of 93

0.00

0.275

0.96

0.000

0.000

0.00

0.00

0.00

192.88

53.49

2987.72

later comparing the results with those of DBD soft, the strength proportions used here are those resulting from the

Auto Betas function of the program, based on an approximate estimation of the elements capacity.

, for a global base shear equal to unity (

),

for which

is the corresponding moment profile. Note that the frames moment at the base is equal to

.

At roof level:

Intermediate levels:

Ground level:

4.

Computation of the systems distribution of base shear in height, based on the displaced shape and the mass

distribution:

, and their corresponding moment profile

, from which the contraflexure height can be determined. As this is the last step of the iteration process,

the contraflexure height determined from the walls moment profile matches the value used for starting this

iteration step.

bloc i

bglob i

Vbfr i (kN)

Mbfr i (kN)

Fi sys (kN)

Vi sys (kN)

Vw i (kN)

Mw i (kNm)

6 21.00 0.0717

0.0502

0.4443

0.000

0.3008

0.3008

-0.1435

0.000

5 17.50 0.1434

0.1004

0.4443

1.555

0.2463

0.5471

0.1028

-0.502

4 14.00 0.1434

0.1004

0.4443

3.110

0.1919

0.7390

0.2947

-0.142

3 10.50 0.1434

0.1004

0.4443

4.665

0.1377

0.8767

0.4324

0.889

7.00

0.1434

0.1004

0.4443

6.220

0.0855

0.9622

0.5179

2.402

3.50

0.1434

0.1004

0.8766

7.775

0.0378

1.0000

0.1234

4.215

0.00

0.2113

0.1479

10.843

0.0000

1.000

0.7000

i hi (m)

4.647

6. Computation of the frames storey yield drift. As all beams height and length is the same, this value is constant

for all beams and all storeys:

rad

7. Computation of the frames ductility demand and equivalent viscous damping. For each storey,

. The

whole frames ductility demand and equivalent viscous damping are computed as:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 81 of 93

8. Computation of each walls yield displacement, ductility demand and equivalent viscous damping.

Hcf

(for

9. Computation of the systems equivalent viscous damping for excitation in the X direction:

10. Determination of the systems spectral reduction factor and the reduced spectral corner displacement:

11. Determination of the systems effective period, effective stiffness and base shear:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 82 of 93

Calculation of the P-Delta stability coefficient for each storey:

The vertical load at each storey is the product of the cumulative mass and the acceleration of gravity. The design

storey shear is equal to the proportion of storey shear with respect to the base shear (Vi/Vb) and the base shear

calculated above. The following table contains the corresponding calculations:

As it can be observed, the maximum P-Delta stability coefficient is smaller than the 0.10 limit for concrete

structures and, therefore, no increase in the design base shear is necessary (i.e. the design base shear calculated

in the previous step is the final design base shear).

13. Determination of design overturning moment:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 83 of 93

;

Wall 3:

As

and

depend on the contraflexure height, they will vary at each iteration step.

Iteration process:

To start, the contraflexure height is estimated from:

if

if

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 84 of 93

As

for

for

At each iteration step, the contraflexure height ratio is confronted to the pre-established limits, and the corresponding

equations for the displacement profile are updated.

The following table shows the values for some of the parameters obtained at each iteration step, together with the ratio

of the newly calculated contraflexure height.

Step

HCF / Hn

HCF (m)

Lp (m)

Qp (rad)

Ratio

0.7597

15.9537

1.054

0.00681

0.8344

0.6339

13.3110

0.974

0.00895

0.9905

0.6278

13.1840

0.971

0.00906

0.9996

0.6276

13.1790

0.970

0.00906

0.9999

At each iteration step, the following process is followed (shown here for the last iteration step):

1.

Computation of the yield displacement and the total design displacement as a function of the contraflexure

height obtained in the previous iteration step (13.179 in this case), and the auxiliary columns that allow for the

final computation of:

i hi (m)

hi+Lsp (m)

mi (tn)

Dyi (m)

Ddi (m)

Qi (rad)

mi*Di

mi*Di^2

mi*Di*hi

6 21.00

21.275

150.00

0.184

0.372

0.02000

55.81

20.76

1171.95

5 17.50

17.775

150.00

0.145

0.302

0.02000

45.31

13.69

792.88

4 14.00

14.275

150.00

0.107

0.232

0.01989

34.81

8.08

487.30

3 10.50

10.775

150.00

0.069

0.162

0.01875

24.37

3.96

255.84

7.00

7.275

150.00

0.035

0.097

0.01614

14.52

1.41

101.64

3.50

3.775

150.00

0.011

0.040

0.01152

6.05

0.24

21.16

0.00

0.275

0.96

0.000

0.000

0.00

0.00

0.00

180.85

48.13

2830.78

2.

Computation of the strength distribution of the frame in height, without counting the ends of the link beams

connected to the wall (

) and, separately, the contribution of the link beams (

). In this example, local

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 85 of 93

strength distributions are global distributions as well, since the frame-wall is the only subsystem working in the Y

direction. With the aim of later comparing the results with those of DBD soft, the strength proportions used here

are those resulting from the Auto Betas function of the program, based on an approximate estimation of the

elements capacity. As both ends of the link beams are assigned the same capacity, the contribution from their

connected end at any intermediate storey is computed as:

, for a global base shear equal to unity (

),

for which

is the corresponding moment profile. Note that the frames moment at the base is equal to

.

At roof level:

Intermediate levels:

Ground level:

4.

as the cumulative product of the link beams

strength proportion and the overturning moment corresponding to a unitary base shear.

5.

Computation of the systems distribution of base shear in height, based on the displaced shape and the mass

distribution:

i hi (m) bfr i bLB i Vbfr i (kN) Mbfr i (kN) MLB i (kNm) Fi sys (kN) Vi sys (kN) Vw i (kN) Mw i (kNm)

6 21.00 0.0383 0.0125

0.3423

0.000

0.19545

0.3086

0.3086

-0.0337

0.000

0.3423

1.198

0.58635

0.2505

0.5591

0.2168

-0.118

0.3423

2.396

0.97726

0.1925

0.7516

0.4093

0.641

0.3423

3.594

1.36816

0.1347

0.8863

0.5440

2.073

0.3423

4.792

1.75906

0.0803

0.9666

0.6243

3.978

0.6411

5.990

2.14997

0.0334

1.0000

0.3589

6.163

8.233

2.14997

0.0000

0 0.00 0.1051

S

7.419

0.5260 0.1374

, and their corresponding moment profile

. This moment profile needs to be adjusted due to the effect of the link beams over the walls

moments, and so the final moment profile of the wall is calculated as

. It is noted

that the link beams introduce jumps in the walls moment profile, and thus it is necessary to compute the final

moment just above and just below each beam level, as shown below. From the final moment profile of the wall,

the contraflexure height can be determined. As this is the last step of the iteration process, the contraflexure

height determined from the walls moment profile matches the value used for starting this iteration step.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

7.

Page 86 of 93

Computation of the frames storey yield drifts, as the weighted average of the yield drift corresponding to each

plastic hinge with respect to their strength proportions:

Standard beam ends:

rad

Link-beam unconnected ends:

rad

Link-beam connected ends:

rad

8. Computation of the frames ductility demand and equivalent viscous damping. For each storey,

. The

whole frames ductility demand and equivalent viscous damping are computed as:

It is noted that the ductility demand and equivalent viscous damping of the frame includes the contribution of the

ends of the link beams that are connected to the wall and, thus, the storey shear to be used to compute the

ductility demand of the system is that resulting not only from

but also from

, as shown below:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 87 of 93

9. Computation of the walls yield displacement, ductility demand and equivalent viscous damping.

(for

10. Computation of the systems equivalent viscous damping for excitation in the Y direction:

11. Determination of the systems spectral reduction factor and the reduced spectral corner displacement:

12. Determination of the systems effective period, effective stiffness and base shear:

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 88 of 93

Calculation of the P-Delta stability coefficient for each storey:

The vertical load at each storey is the product of the cumulative mass and the acceleration of gravity. The design

storey shear is equal to the proportion of storey shear with respect to the base shear (Vi/Vb) and the base shear

calculated above. The following table contains the corresponding calculations:

As it can be observed, the maximum P-Delta stability coefficient is smaller than the 0.10 limit for concrete

structures and, therefore, no increase in the design base shear is necessary (i.e. the design base shear calculated

in the previous step is the final design base shear).

15. Determination of design overturning moment:

NOTE: The result of each step of the procedure has been presented in a rounded format, but all decimal places have been

carried throughout the calculations. This explains small differences that the user can obtain when following the numbers

by hand, if not all decimal places are used (with the aid of a spreadsheet, for example).

Test B4

Example Test B4

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 89 of 93

Description

Value

Units

Number of storeys

Interstorey height

3.5

Building height

31.5

External columns

HE300M

Internal columns

HE320M

IPE550

IPE500

IPE450

Beams Storey 8

IPE 400

Beams Storey 9

IPE330

Number of Bays

Bay length

6.0

Description

Value

Units

736

ton/storey

Elastic Damping

3.0

[%]

f'ce

30

[Mpa]

fye

484

[Mpa]

fue

581

[Mpa]

Es

210000

[Mpa]

eye

0.002305

[-]

0.9552.5=2.38

[%]

Parameter

Value

Units

Corner Displacement

0.889

Corner Period

8.0

sec

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 90 of 93

Elastic Damping

3.0

PGA

0.4

Step-by-step calculations

The displacement profile of a steel frame is calculated from:

Code drift limit

= 2.5%.

The resulting displacement profile and the auxiliary calculations needed to compute the equivalent SDOF substitute

structure are shown in the following table.

Storey

Hi (m)

Mass

d,i

mi.i

mi.i2

mi.i.hi

Fi

Vi/Vb

31.5

736

0.580

427

248

13450

0.264

0.264

28.0

736

0.535

394

211

11021

0.151

0.415

24.5

736

0.485

357

173

8739

0.137

0.552

21.0

736

0.430

316

136

6642

0.121

0.673

17.5

736

0.370

272

101

4766

0.104

0.778

14.0

736

0.306

225

69

3149

0.086

0.864

10.5

736

0.236

174

41

1827

0.067

0.931

7.0

736

0.162

119

19

836

0.046

0.976

3.5

736

0.084

62

215

0.024

1.000

0.0

0.000

0.000

2345.86

1002.23

50646.90

Total

m

tn

m

The proportion of base shear that is applied at each storey as an equivalent force is calculated as shown below. Results

are shown in the table above. The design storey shear (Vi/Vb) is computed by simply summing the equivalent lateral

forces down the building height.

Floors 1 to n-1:

Roof (floor n):

Yield drift:

IPE550:

rad

IPE500:

rad

IPE450:

rad

IPE400:

rad

IPE330:

rad

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 91 of 93

For each storey, the design drift and ductility demand are computed, as shown in the following table. The whole

frames ductility demand is computed as a weighted average of each storeys ductility demand. Note that the upper

storeys are not expected to yield and, thus, the ratio of the storeys design drift to its yield drift is less than unity. In

these cases, a value of 1.0 is assigned to the ductility demand, as the purpose of this calculation is the determination of

the equivalent viscous damping of the system, which is equal to the elastic damping for all values of ductility demand

equal to or smaller than 1.0.

Vi/Vb

Vy,i/Vb

0.00342

0.264

0.554

0.00594

0.00594

0.415

0.651

0.785

0.00866

0.00866

0.552

0.702

0.0200

0.854

0.01148

0.01148

0.673

0.788

0.0184

0.0180

1.025

0.01467

0.01432

0.778

0.777

14.0

0.0198

0.0180

1.100

0.01880

0.01709

0.864

0.860

10.5

0.0211

0.0180

1.176

0.02315

0.01968

0.931

0.922

7.0

0.0225

0.0163

1.377

0.03027

0.02198

0.976

0.958

3.5

0.0239

0.0163

1.461

0.03488

0.02388

1.000

0.977

0.0

0.15127

0.12644

Storey

Hi (m)

Vi/Vb

31.5

0.0130

0.0272

0.476

0.00342

28.0

0.0143

0.0225

0.637

24.5

0.0157

0.0200

21.0

0.0171

17.5

Total

Vi/Vb

For a steel frame, it is appropriate to assume a 3% elastic damping. In this way, the response spectrum modification

factor is computed in two steps, as the product of factor

and (Pennucci et al. [2011]):

Modification factor for 5% elastic damping:

Elastic damping correction factor:

Modification factor for 5% elastic damping:

Reduced spectral corner displacement:

Systems required effective stiffness:

kN/m

kN

Base shear (no P-Delta amplification accounted for yet):

kN

Calculation of the P-Delta stability coefficient for each storey:

The vertical load at each storey is the product of the cumulative mass and the acceleration of gravity. The design storey

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 92 of 93

shear is equal to the proportion of storey shear with respect to the base shear (Vi/Vb) and the base shear calculated

above. The following table contains the corresponding calculations:

Level hi (m) d,i

Mass

(t)

Vi,x/Vb Vdi

P-

VP-,i

31.5

0.580 0.013

736

736

0.264

1097

0.085

194

28

0.535 0.014

736

1472

0.415

1725

0.120

179

24.5

0.485 0.016

736

2208

0.552

2294

0.148

162

21

0.430 0.017

736

2944

0.673

2798

0.176

144

17.5

0.370 0.018

736

3680

0.778

3233

0.206

124

14

0.306 0.020

736

4416

0.864

3591

0.239

102

10.5

0.236 0.021

736

5152

0.931

3869

0.276

79

0.162 0.023

736

5888

0.976

4060

0.320

54

3.5

0.084 0.024

736

6624

1.000

4158

0.373

28

VP- -->

1065.911

As it can be observed, the maximum P-Delta stability coefficient exceeds the 0.30 limit and, therefore, the structure

might be at risk of suffering dynamic instability. It is recommended that the design maximum drift be reduced so that the

maximum P-Delta stability coefficient does not exceed the 0.30 limit. However, the software is set up to carry out the

subsequent calculations anyway (and the process to obtain the additional base shear due to P-Delta considerations is

actually the same). The design base shear is increased by the following quantity:

For steel, C = 1.00. From the table, the additional base shear is 1066 kN.

The final design base shear is:

kN

kNm

NOTE: The result of each step of the procedure has been presented in a rounded format, but all decimal places have

been carried throughout the calculations. This explains small differences that the user can obtain when following the

numbers by hand, if not all decimal places are used (with the aid of a spreadsheet, for example).

References

Previous Top

References

Beyer K., Dazio A., Priestley, M.J.N., (2008) Seismic Design of Torsionally Eccentric Buildings with RC U-shaped walls,

Research Report No. ROSE 2008/03, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

Calvi G.M. editor (2003) Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings fib Bulletin No. 25, fib,

Lausanne, 192pp.

Calvi G.M. and Sullivan. T.J. Editors (2009) A model code for the Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, DBD09

Draft Issued for Public Enquiry, IUSS Press, 80pages.

Gulkan, P., and Sozen, M. (1974) Inelastic Response of Reinforced Concrete Structures to Earthquake Motions ACI

Journal, 71(12), 604-610.

Magni, F., Sullivan, T.J., Pinho R., Calvi G.M., (2011) Development of computer software for Direct Displacement Based

Design Proceedings of Structural Engineering World Conference 2011, Como, Italy, paper No.73.

Nievas, C.I. and Sullivan, T.J. (2014) Developing the Direct Displacement-Based Design Method for RC Strong Frame

Weak Wall Structures, Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul Aug. 25 th-29th

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

DBDsoft

Page 93 of 93

2014.

Paulay, T., (2002), The Displacement Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Coupled Walls, Engineering Structures, Vol.24,

pp1165-1171.

Pennucci, D., Sullivan, T.J., Calvi, G.M. [2011] Displacement reduction factors for the design of medium and long-period

structures, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 15, Supplement 1, pp. 1-29

Pettinga, J.D. and Priestley, M.J.N. (2005) Dynamic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames Designed with Direct

Displacement-Based Design Report No. ROSE 2005/02, IUSS press: www.iusspress.it, 154 pages.

Priestley, M.J.N. (1993), Myths and Fallacies in Earthquake Engineering Conflicts Between Design and Reality Bulletin

NZ National Society for Earthquake Engineering,. Vol. 26., n.3, 328-341.

Priestley M.J.N., (1998). "Brief Comments on Elastic Flexibility of Reinforced Concrete Frames, and Significance to Seismic

Design Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand National Society for

Earthquake Engineering, Silverstream. Vol. 31, No.4.

Priestley M.J.N., Amaris A.D. (2002) Dynamic Amplification of Seismic Moments and Shear Forces in Cantilever Walls,

ROSE Research Report 2002/01, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy, 95 pages.

Priestley M.J.N., Kowalsky M.J. (1998). "Aspects of Drift and Ductility Capacity of Cantilever Structural Walls. Bulletin of

the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering,

Silverstream. Vol. 31, No.2.

Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G.M., Kowalsky, M. J. (2007) Direct Displacement-Based Seismic Design IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy,

720pages.

Shibata, A. and Sozen, M. (1976) Substitute Structure Method for Seismic Design in Reinforced Concrete Journal

Structural Division, ASCE, 102(12), 3548-3566.

Sullivan, T.J. and Lago, A. (2012) Towards a simplified Direct DBD procedure for the seismic design of moment resisting

frames with viscous dampers Engineering Structures, Vol. 35 pp. 140-148.

Sullivan, T.J., Priestley, M.J.N. and Calvi, G.M., (2006) Seismic design of frame-wall structures Research Report

ROSE2006/02, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy, 333pp

Sullivan, T.J., Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M., Editors (2012) A model code for the Displacement-Based Seismic Design of

Structures, DBD12, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy, 105 pages.

file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/~hh512C.htm

11/12/2015

- Crane Girder CamberUploaded byGary J. Davis, P. E.
- Performance Based Seismic DesignUploaded byIp Siu Hei
- Displacement-Based Seismic Design of StructuresUploaded bymgrubisic
- Moment ConnectionUploaded bypandyatushar
- String BookUploaded byreliantaustralia
- Properties of PlasticsUploaded byS.k. Bhatt
- 2011AISBEGUIDELINESCorr2_4-12Uploaded byCaroline Villiard
- Push Over Analysis for Concrete Structures at seismic zone-3 using ETABS software.pdfUploaded bymahmood hunar
- An Investigation on the Accuracy of Pushover AnalysisUploaded byRonald Torres
- SS SimulationXpress Study 1Uploaded byAri Wibowo Nugroho
- Ahmed 1998Uploaded byLeonardoMadeira11
- 57.pdfUploaded bySudan Shrestha
- CIV4218 - Assignment #1 - Methods of DesignUploaded byJonathan
- Week 9 - Linear Structural Analysis - Lecture Presentation.pdfUploaded byAngelo Giovanni Oñate Soto
- otaniUploaded byAnup Kumar Halder
- Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels.pptxUploaded byAdonis C. Bibat
- POA_Mtech proj.pdfUploaded byAjay Kumar Sreerama
- 13_2076Uploaded byDip Roshan Chaudhary
- 2102TN42Uploaded bymohamad mostafavi
- material testingUploaded byapi-348195110
- CCE2010 I.olteanu M.anechitei I.O.toma M.budescu.docUploaded byOlteanu Ioana
- 01 - Steel Characteristics.pdfUploaded byMushthofa Malik
- A 49 - 01.pdfUploaded byfekihassan
- Presentation 1Uploaded bySaad Ullah
- L3x3-vbUploaded byAnonymous xcFcOgMi
- 2917_HxGN-LIVE-2917_Delaforce.pdfUploaded byAnonymous fj9ypF83
- 10.5923.c.jce.201402.33Uploaded bySaurabh Pednekar
- Mechanical Report Square SectionUploaded bydrajkumarce
- Mechanical Report Tor CirUploaded bydrajkumarce
- 20160309Uploaded byRakesh Yadav

- FEMA P695 - Quantification of Building Seismic Performance FactorsUploaded byGiapVap
- WCEE2012_4135 DBDSOFTUploaded bypouyamh
- Development of a Model Code for Direct Displacement Based Seismic Design Calvi 2009Uploaded bypouyamh
- EC8 Seismic Design of Buildings - Worked examplesUploaded byMarco Fasan
- DBDsoft_supplementpplementUploaded bypouyamh
- An Equivalent Accidental Eccentricity to Account for the Effects of Torsional Ground Motion on Structures-Basu-2014-IsIUploaded bypouyamh
- ChopraUploaded byBrankica Zivkovic
- Guidlines for Displacement-Based Design of Buildings and BridgesUploaded bypouyamh
- Technical Comittee on Performance-based Design and Utilization of Precast Concrete Products-Hisada-2011Uploaded bypouyamh
- Development of Computer Software for Direct Displacement Based Design-Fabitzio Magni-2011Uploaded bypouyamh
- Direct Displacement-Based Design of Frame-Wall Structures-Sullivan,Priestley,Calvi-2006Uploaded bypouyamh
- Development of a Model Code for Direct Displacement Based Seismic Design-calvi-2009Uploaded bypouyamh
- A Direct Displacement Based Seismic Design Procedure of Inelastic Structures 2001Uploaded bydragos_vm8526
- A Displacement-Based Seismic Design for Reinforced Concrete Structures-Boulaouad-2011-IsIUploaded bypouyamh

- Commas Application AppUploaded bykirubaakaranJ
- SonicOS 5.9.0.3 Rev B Release NotesUploaded byHai Vu
- Pellet Market Overview ReportUploaded byParjea Marius
- Literature ReviewUploaded byPrashant Mathur
- Camioneta HiluxUploaded byLuz Apaza
- Servo ValvesUploaded byRam Esh
- Starting Python - Python _ DaniWebUploaded byParvez Mohammed
- Store ManagementUploaded byJames Jamsmith
- Reverse Engineering Smac-tutUploaded bySagar Rastogi
- DR160 Manual EmailUploaded bymarkhmcb
- Fatemi 1998Uploaded byRushabh Patel
- iCHIROPRO 智慧型數位植牙機Uploaded bymonitex_tw
- Value Map 09Uploaded bysampath_gsk
- ACE Exam Guide FlashCS5Uploaded byFarrukh Usman
- A 875 – a 875m – 02 _qtg3ns9bodc1ts1sruqUploaded byHani Yilmaz
- scr_infoUploaded byjohan.duraan9540
- 2016-elevator-pressurization-in-tall-buildings.pdfUploaded byadca
- Final Acoutic LouvreUploaded byDucViking
- Indg225 - Preventing Slips and Trips at WorkUploaded byAli Mohd
- DriverUploaded byJuse Man
- 3HT-00Uploaded bySavio Sun
- delam.pdfUploaded bybnidhal
- KROHNE IFC 010Uploaded bycvw001ar
- AbsoluteEncoders OCD IndustrialEthernet TCP IP Manual DataContentUploaded byVoicu Stanese
- 1728 1738 ProgrammingUploaded bysasa68
- Rocket Propulsion and Spaceflight DynamicsUploaded byUday Reddy
- 1 09 BukowskiUploaded bymy_khan20027195
- GF4EALUploaded byluis
- 19 Chapter CopyUploaded byAnonymous 9uu04el
- Cigre PaperUploaded byMarco Bautista