00 upvotes00 downvotes

99 views6 pagesThis paper presents a mathematical model of the proportional valve main stage flow characteristics. Model is
verified with static measurements. Valve spool dynamics are modelled but not verified. Model uses variable
sonic conductance and critical pressure ratio that are based on measurements. Valve control system and pilot stage are not included this model. This means that the model reacts faster than the real valve does.
Model of the valve control electronics and pilot stage will be presented in our next paper.

Dec 12, 2015

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

This paper presents a mathematical model of the proportional valve main stage flow characteristics. Model is
verified with static measurements. Valve spool dynamics are modelled but not verified. Model uses variable
sonic conductance and critical pressure ratio that are based on measurements. Valve control system and pilot stage are not included this model. This means that the model reacts faster than the real valve does.
Model of the valve control electronics and pilot stage will be presented in our next paper.

© All Rights Reserved

99 views

00 upvotes00 downvotes

This paper presents a mathematical model of the proportional valve main stage flow characteristics. Model is
verified with static measurements. Valve spool dynamics are modelled but not verified. Model uses variable
sonic conductance and critical pressure ratio that are based on measurements. Valve control system and pilot stage are not included this model. This means that the model reacts faster than the real valve does.
Model of the valve control electronics and pilot stage will be presented in our next paper.

© All Rights Reserved

You are on page 1of 6

*Zdenk VARGA, **Petri-Keski HONKOLA

*Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Applied Cybernetics

Studentsk 2, 461 17, Liberec, Czech Republic

Email: zdenek.varga@gmail.com

**Aalto University, Engineering design and Production

P.O.Box 14400, 00076 Espoo, Finland

Email: petri.keski-honkola@aalto.fi

This paper presents a mathematical model of the proportional valve main stage flow characteristics. Model is

verified with static measurements. Valve spool dynamics are modelled but not verified. Model uses variable

sonic conductance and critical pressure ratio that are based on measurements. Valve control system and

pilot stage are not included this model. This means that the model reacts faster than the real valve does.

Model of the valve control electronics and pilot stage will be presented in our next paper.

Keywords: proportional pneumatic valve; mathematic model; pressure ratio; sonic conductance

1 INTRODUCTION

The pneumatic proportional valve presented in this paper is used for fast and precise pressure control.

Schema of the proportional pressure control valve is presented in Figure 1. In our case this proportional

valve supplied pressurized air into an pneumatic muscle which was used in our earlier measuring

arrangement [1].

The position of pneumatic muscle can be controlled with air pressure if the load is known [2]. For controlling

a pneumatic muscle movement, it is necessary to know the mathematic model of both the muscle and the

valve. This paper is about the main stage part of the Festo VPPM-6L-L-1-G18-0L6H valve model (part 5 in

Figure 1). Previous research [3, 4] of the authors was used in building this model. In earlier research sonic

conductance C and the critical pressure ratio b were measured as the functions of the valve poppet position.

Integral part of our previous research was to validate the model with static measurements. This was done by

pressurizing a relatively large constant volume through the valve [3].For model presented here, the

mechanism of the valve main stage is measured and modelled. However this part of the model cant be

verified by the earlier measurement because it is too slow to show any dynamic behaviour. No dynamic

model verification has been done because control system and pilot stage of the valve havent been modelled

yet and they have a major effect to valve response time.

2 - pilot stage control processor, 3 -pilot valves, 4 - pilot stage

surface, 5 main stage spool, 6 pilot pressure sensor, 7 output

pressure sensor.

Vol. 1, No. 1/2012, ISSN 1802-9388

Creating mathematic model of pneumatic proportional split in two parts. First of them describes the air flow

which goes through the valve. The second involves equations of motion for the poppet of the valve.

Equations are different for filling and emptying the air through valve output port. Poppet mechanism is shown

in Figure 2.

2.1 Description of air flow through the valve

Air flow was described by using ISO 6358 standard [5]. Sonic conductance C and the critical pressure ratio b

were measured as functions of valve poppet position and then included in modified flow equations (1) and

(2)

q *m ( x ) = C ( x) p1 0

T0

T1

q m ( x) = C ( x) p1 0

where

0

p1

p2

T0

T1

C(x)

b(x)

T0

T1

for

p2

b

p1

p2

b( x )

1 1

1 b( x )

(1)

checked flow ,

for

p2

>b

p1

subsonic flow ,

(2)

- means density,

- means upstream pressure,

- means downstream pressure,

- means upstream temperature,

- means downstream temperature,

- means sonic conductance in dependence on the stroke of poppet,

- means critical pressure ratio in dependence on the stroke of poppet.

The sonic conductance C and critical pressure ratio b is determined as a function of poppet position in our

previous research. Parameters C and b are determined by filling and emptying a constant volume tank with

different openings of the poppet [6]. Obtained values of sonic conductance and critical pressure ratio were

th

th

fitted by using polynomial functions of 7 and 4 degree, equations (3) and (4).

Note that the variable x is the stroke of poppet and has a range of

experimentally determined by dimension analysis on the actual valve.

b( x) = p1 x 4 + p2 x 3 + p3 x 2 + p 4 x + p5

7

C ( x) = k1 x + k 2 x + k 3 x + k 4 x + k 5 x + k 6 x + k 7 x + k8

where p1,..,pn

k1,..,kn

x

C(x)

b(x)

(3)

,

,

- means constant coefficients for sonic conductance polynomial approximation,

- means stroke of poppet where

[mm],

- means sonic conductance dependence on poppet position

- means critical pressure ratio dependence on poppet position

(4)

Vol. 1, No. 1/2012, ISSN 1802-9388

This section describes the kinematic equations of the valve main stage mechanism. Valve construction

determined that different equations of motion had to be used for pressurizing and depressurizing the output

port. Equation (5) describes the parts of the valve that move during the filling, when the pressurized air goes

from pressure port 1 to output port 2.Equation (7) describes the case of emptying, when the air goes from

output port 2 to the exhauster port 3. Equations (6) and (8) describe the force generated by the pilot stage of

the valve. Pilot stage is separated from the main stage with a metal disc and rubber membrane.

Output port 2

Pressure port 1

Exhauster port 3

Figure 2: Schema of the valve for the case of filling on the left and for the emptying of working space on the right

Integral part of creating mathematical model of proportional pneumatic valve was measuring the stiffness of

the spring, properties of membrane and the weight of all parts.

Equation of motion for filling the working space:

where mp

b

x

k1

k2

h1

h2

pp

S

(5)

F p (t ) = S p p (t ) ,

(6)

- means damping constant,

- means stroke of poppet where

[mm],

- means upper spring constant,

- means bottom spring constant

- means upper spring displacement in rest position,

- means bottom spring displacement in rest position,

- means controlling pressure for filling working place,

- means area of metal plate.

Vol. 1, No. 1/2012, ISSN 1802-9388

The value of damping constant has been solved by measuring mechanical properties of membrane. The

measured hysteresis data has been linearized and membrane stiffness is derived from this.

Equation of motion for emptying the working space:

where mp

po

b

x

k1

h1

S

(7)

Fo (t ) = S p o (t ) ,

(8)

- means controlling pressure for emptying working place,

- means damping constant,

- means stroke of poppet where

[mm],

- means upper spring constant,

- means upper spring displacement in rest position,

- means area of metal plate.

3 RESULTS

In the subsection 2.1 we discussed about the process of determining sonic conductance C(x) and critical

pressure ratio b(x) as functions of poppet position. For the case where pressurized air is directed to output

port, we were able to make an approximation from measured data by using polynomial functions. This was

done in previous research done by the authors [3]. The graphs with measured data and our approximations

are shown in figs.3 and 4.

2

x 10

-8

1.8

)]

a

P

*

s(

/

1.6

1.4

m

[

C

e 1.2

c

n

at

c

1

u

d

n

o

c

ci 0.8

n

o

S

0.6

0.4

0

Data approximation by polynomial 7th degree

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Stroke of poppet x [x10 3 m]

0.7

0.8

0.9

0.75

0.7

]

-[

b

oi

t

ar

er

u

s

s

er

p

l

a

ci

ti

r

C

0.65

Data approximation by polynomial 4th degree

0.6

0.55

0.5

0.45

0.4

0.35

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Stroke of poppet x [x10 3 m]

0.7

0.8

0.9

Vol. 1, No. 1/2012, ISSN 1802-9388

From the Figures 3 and 4 we can see that the sonic conductance C(x) and critical pressure ratio b(x) arent

constant values but nonlinear functions of poppet position. Same conclusion can be found in literature with

similar research [4] [8]. When the output port is opened to exhaust channel the poppet moves to same

position every time and opens a constant size orifice. This means that the sonic conductance C and the

critical pressure ratio b are constant. These constants were measured by emptying a known amount of

pressurized air through the valve.

The constant coefficient for polynomial function C(x) and b(x) for the case filling of working space are

presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Constant coefficients for polynomial functions C(x) and b(x) for the case of filling the working space

p1 = 3,16180

k1 = -1.1858e-6

p2 = -8,31770

k2 = 4.5064e-6

p3 = 7,68470

k3 = -6.9209e-6

p4 = -2,73840

k4 = 5.4385e-6

p5 = 0,71748

k5 = -2.2269e-6

k6 = 3.7653e-7

k7 = 2.1902e-8

k8 = 5.0034e-9

Based on the knowledge gained from our previous research, it was possible to measure mechanical

properties of the valve and to create the motion equations (5) to (8). Using these equations it was possible to

construct a simulation model of the system in Simulink. Model for filling the working space is shown in Figure

5. It consists of valve main spool model (left side of the model) and model of the tank (right side of the

3

model). Tank model is isentropic because during the filling gas temperature inside the 0.2 m tank rises

approximately 18 C.

S

-CT1

Step

-C-C-

k

-C-

k2

-Ch2

-C-

kapa R0

-K-

T0

P(u)

O(P) = 7

C(x)

q

-Ck1

-Ch1

-C-

sqrt

-CV2

-Kro

-Cmass

1/s

1/s

x1

x2

-Kro 1

1/s

p1

-C-

x stroke

of poppet P1

P(u)

O(P) = 4

b(x)

P2 - pressure

inside the tank

p20

MATLAB

Function

measured_data

k2*(h2-x)

Figure 5: Mathematical model of the proportional valve joined with mathematical model of tank

Vol. 1, No. 1/2012, ISSN 1802-9388

5

5.5

x 10

5

4.5

4

]

a

P[

er

u

s

s

er

P

3.5

3

2.5

2

Required value

Mathematical model

Measured data

1.5

1

0.5

0

20

40

60

Time [s]

80

100

120

Figure 6: Dependence internal pressure on time combination mathematical model of valve join with mathematical

model tank

5 CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of simulation and measurement shows us that the model works well in slow processes.

Measured data does not reach the same pressure as fast as model presumes. Main reason for this is

probably the fact that the tank model was isentropic and in reality heat is transferred out of the gas to the

steel tank. This also drops the pressure inside the tank. More precise model of the tank would be polytrophic.

Using non constant sonic conductance and critical pressure ratio makes the model much more precise when

the valve operates with different pilot pressures. This part of the model will be of its full use only after the rest

of the valve model is implemented.

In future, valve pilot stage will also be measured and modelled and control parameters evaluated. This full

model of the valve will be used together with the model of the muscle to simulate muscle position system.

Full valve model will also give us information about dynamic limitations of different components of the VMMP

valve. This information is important if the valve or parts of the valve are used for very fast pressure control,

for example in an active vibration damping systems.

REFERENCES

[1] VARGA, Z. - MOUKA, M.: Mechanic of Pneumatic Artificial Muscle.Journal of Applied Science in the

Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics.January 2009, vol. 3, No 2/2009, pp. 16, ISSN 1802-9388.

[2] DAERDEN, F. - LEFEBER, D.: Pneumatic Artificial Muscles: actuators forrobotics and automation.

European Journal of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering.Citeseer, 2002,issue 1,vol. 47,pp. 11

21, ISSN 00353612.

[3] VARGA, Z. - KESKI-HONKOLA, P.: Determination of Flow Rate Characteristic for Pneumatic

Valves.Experimental fluid mechanics 2011.Jin (Czech Republic), 22nd - 25th November 2011, vol. 1,

Conference proceedings are listed in ISI-Web of Knowledge,ISBN 978-80-7372-784-0.

[4] BEATER, P.: Pneumatic Drivers: System Design, Modelling and Control. Springer, Berlin, Germany,

2006.ISBN-10 3-540-69470-6.

[5] ISO 6358: Pneumatic fluid power Components using compressible fluids Determination of flow-rate

characteristics, 1989.

[6] GIORGI, d. R. - KOBBI, N. - SESMAT, S., Bideauxthermal, E.: Model of a Tank for Simulation and Mass

Flow Rate Characterization Purposes Toyama.Proceedings of the 7th JFPS International Symposium on

Fluid Power.September 15-18, 2008, pp.225-230.

[7] PRABEL, R. - SCHINDELE, D. - ASCHEMANN, H.: Nonlinear Control of an Electro-Pneumatic Clutch for

Truck Applications using Extended Linearisation Techniques.The Twelfth Scandinavian International

Conference on Fluid Power. Tampere, Finlad, May 18 20, 2011, vol. 1, pp. 125-136 , ISBN 978-952-152518-6.

[8] NEVRL, J.: Introduction to the modelling pneumatic systems (Original Czech title - vod do modelovn

pneumatickch systm). esk strojnick spolenost, stedn odborn sekce Hydraulika a

pneumatika. Praha, 2003,1. Vydn nklad 40 vtisk, pp. 79, ISBN 80-02-01549-5.

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.