You are on page 1of 15

Page 1 of 15

THE IDEA THAT NICOLE VAISEY IS SOME KIND OF


VICTIM DESERVING OF LENIENCY IS ABHORRENT.
THE IDEA ADVANCED BY HER FRIENDS AND
FAMILY IN THEIR LETTERS TO THE COURT THAT
SHE IS SOME KIND OF HEROINE, THAT SHE RESCUED
THE AMISH GIRLS FROM SURE DEATH AT THE HANDS
OF STEPHEN HOWELLS, IS NOTHING SHORT OF A LIE.
A LIE MANUFACTURED SOMEWHERE BY SOMEONE TO
PAINT NICOLE VAISEY IN A BETTER LIGHT THAN THE
ONE THE TRUTH EXPOSES.

IT IS A FICTION THE

PEOPLE CLOSE TO HER HAVE GRABBED ONTO


BECAUSE THE TRUTH IS SIMPLY TOO PAINFUL.
NICOLE

VAISEY

HERSELF

HAS

NEVER

MAINTAINED THAT HOWELLS WAS PLANNING TO


KILL ANYONE, NOR THAT SHE THWARTED ANY SUCH

Page 2 of 15

SCHEME. IN FACT, WHAT SHE SAYS IS THAT WHEN


SHE AND HOWELLS REALIZED THEY COULD NOT
KEEP THE AMISH GIRLS -- BECAUSE THE CELL THEY
HAD BUILT WAS NOT SOUNDPROOF -- HOWELLS
ASKED HER WHAT THEY SHOULD DO, AND SHE CAME
UP WITH THE IDEA TO DRIVE THEM SOMEWHERE AND
DROP THEM OFF.
SHE IS NO HEROINE.
WHAT SHE IS IS JUST AS CULPABLE, JUST AS VILE,
JUST AS DANGEROUS AS STEPHEN HOWELLS.
AND SHE IS LIKEWISE NO VICTIM.
THE ONLY THING NICOLE VAISEY WAS EVER
AFRAID OF DURING HER ENTIRE RELATIONSHIP WITH
STEPHEN HOWELLS IS THAT HE WOULD BREAK UP

Page 3 of 15

WITH HER.

THAT WAS THE FATE OF HIS OTHER

RELATIONSHIPS, INCLUDING HIS TWO EX-WIVES.


THEIR MARRIAGES FELL APART WHEN HOWELLS
SEXUAL PROCLIVITIES BECAME TOO MUCH FOR
THEM.
NICOLE WAS GOING TO KEEP HER MAN.
MATTER WHAT.
ANYTHING

NOT

NO

AND SHE WOULD WILLINGLY DO


TO

LOSE

HIM.

INCLUDING

PARTICIPATING IN THE RAPE AND SODOMY OF


CHILDREN.
BUT THE ABUSE OF THE VULNERABLE WAS NOT
SOMETHING NICOLE VAISEY HAD TO BE DRAGGED
INTO.

SHE DID THAT ON HER OWN AT A

RESIDENTIAL FACILITY WHERE SHE WAS ENTRUSTED


TO CARE FOR THE DISABLED.

Page 4 of 15

THERE SHE FILMED RESIDENTS WHILE THEY


WERE NAKED AND BATHING.

SHE SEXUALLY

ABUSED A SEVERELY MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY


DISABLED RESIDENT WHO WAS INCAPABLE OF
SPEECH INCAPABLE OF REPORTING THE ABUSE.
AND SHE FILMED IT WITH HER CELL PHONE.
THAT IS THE NICOLE VAISEY WHO WENT
WILLINGLY WITH THE MAN SHE WANTED TO BE WITH
INTO THE ABUSE OF CHILDREN.
SHE DEVISED THE PLAN TO GAIN OVERNIGHT
ACCESS TO 7 YEAR OLD V-3.

SHE ABUSED HER

RELATIONSHIPS TO USE THE CHILD 9 SEPARATE


TIMES AS AN OBJECT SHE AND HOWELLS COULD
ABUSE AS THEY PLEASED.

Page 5 of 15

WHEN SHE TEXTED HOWELLS THAT SHE HAD


BEEN THINKING ABOUT HER PLAN HE ASKED: PLAN
OR FANTASY? VAISEYS RESPONSE WAS: PLAN.
AND SHE EXPLAINED HOW IT WOULD WORK - HOW
SHE WOULD GAIN ACCESS TO V-3 FOR A SLEEPOVER,
AND HOW TO DRUG HER.
HOURS LATER, VAISEY INFORMED HOWELLS
THAT SHE HAD PUT THE PLAN INTO ACTION, THAT V3S MOTHER HAD AGREED TO THE SLEEPOVER. AND 5
DAYS LATER THEY SHOT THEIR FIRST SET OF VIDEOS
DEPICTING THEIR SEXUAL ABUSE OF THE CHILD.
DIABOLICAL.
VAISEY REPEATED THIS PLAN 8 MORE TIMES.
SHE WAS THE ONE WITH ACCESS TO V-3, SHE WAS

Page 6 of 15

THE ONE WHO WAS TRUSTED BY THE CHILDS


MOTHER, SHE WAS THE ONE WHO MADE THE
ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE SLEEPOVERS.

AND SHE

ACTIVELY PARTICIPATED IN THE ABUSE.


THE FRIENDS AND FAMILY WHO WANT TO LAUD
HER AS A HERO ARE GLARINGLY SILENT ABOUT THIS
ABUSE.
A RECENT LETTER OF SUPPORT SUGGESTS THAT
NICOLE VAISEY HAS ACCEPTED RESPONSIBILITY FOR
HER ACTIONS. NO. SHE HAS PLED GUILTY TO THEM.
SHE, HOWEVER, CONTINUES TO OFFER HOLLOW
EXCUSES.
FACTS,

EXCUSES THAT ARE REFUTED BY THE


CONTRADICTED

BY

THE

EVIDENCE,

CONTRADICTED BY HER OWN STATEMENTS, AND


CONTRADICTED BY LOGIC.

Page 7 of 15

SHE SAVED THE AMISH GIRLS FROM MURDER?


SHE WAS A MINDLESS ROBOTIC VICTIM OF STEPHEN
HOWELLS WHO ONLY DID WHAT SHE WAS TOLD?
WHAT KIND OF HEROINE, WHAT KIND OF VICTIM
WAS

SHE

WHEN

SHE

LEFT

TWO

FRIGHTENED

KIDNAPPED GIRLS HOME ALONE WITH HOWELLS SO


SHE COULD GO HAVE SNACKS WITH HER SISTER
DOWN THE STREET?

WHAT KIND OF HEROINE OR

VICTIM WAS SHE WHEN SHE WAS PLAYING TRIVIA


GAMES AND CHECKING THE WEATHER ON HER
LAPTOP WHILE HOWELLS ABUSED A 5 YEAR OLD IN
THE BED NEXT TO HER? WHAT KIND OF HEROINE OR
VICTIM WAS SHE WHEN SHE ARRANGED FOR A
SLEEPOVER TO ABUSE V-3 FOR THE FIRST TIME? OR
FOR THE SECOND? OR THE THIRD? OR THE FOURTH?

Page 8 of 15

OR THE FIFTH? OR THE SIXTH? OR THE SEVENTH? OR


THE EIGHTH? OR THE NINTH?
THE WORD IS NOT HERO. IT IS EVIL.
SHE TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR HER CRIMES.
SHE DEFLECTS IT.

SHE PLAYS THE VICTIM.

SHE

PLAYS THE GIRL CARD.


SHE SOUGHT OUT AND BRAGGED ABOUT HER
SADO-MASCHOCHISTIC
HOWELLS.

RELATIONSHIP

WITH

AND SHE WAS DEATHLY AFRAID OF

LOSING IT.
BUT WHEN HER CRIMES CAUGHT UP WITH HER,
VAISEY WAS QUICK TO STEP BACK FROM IT AND LAY
BLAME FOR HER OWN ACTIONS SQUARELY AT THE
FEET OF THE MAN SHE COULD NOT LIVE WITHOUT.

Page 9 of 15

RATHER THAN FACING HER OWN CULPABILITY,


SHE SHAMEFULLY PLAYS FALSE VICTIM.
MANY OF THE ALLEGATIONS PROFFERED IN THE
DEFENSE

SENTENCING

MEMORANDUM

ARE

UNSUPPORTED AND EVEN REFUTED BY THE RECORD.


SAYING IT DOESNT MAKE IT SO.
THE

CLAIM

THAT

HER

FETISH

LIFE

WITH

HOWELLS WAS A SECRET THAT WAS NOT DISCLOSED


TO HER FAMILY IS BELIED BY THE ACTUAL FACT
THAT A MEMBER OF HER FAMILY REPORTS NICOLE
BRAGGED

ABOUT

THE

RELATIONSHIP

AND

PROUDLY SHOWED OFF HER BRUISES AND BITE


MARKS.

Page 10 of 15

STEPHEN HOWELLS JUST STOOD BEFORE THIS


COURT

ARGUING

THAT

WELCOMED ARREST.

HE

ANTICIPATED

AND

BUT VAISEYS SENTENCING

MEMO STATES THAT HOWELLS HAD INTIMATED


SUICIDE RATHER THAN ARREST, AND THAT SHE
FEARED FOR HER LIFE.

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE

ANYWHERE THAT THIS IS AT ALL TRUE. VAISEY


DID NOT TELL THAT TO THE POLICE, HOWELLS HAS
NEVER SAID IT, AND VAISEY DID NOT REPORT THAT
TO THE PROBATION OFFICER IN PREPARATION OF
THE PSR.

THIS IS YET ANOTHER TRIAL BALLOON

THROWN UP TO SEE WHAT MIGHT STICK.

WHAT

FORM OF FEIGNED VICTIMIZATION MIGHT GAIN


SOME TRACTION WITH THE COURT.

Page 11 of 15

VAISEY ARGUES FOR CONCURRENT SENTENCES


BELOW THE STATUTRORY MAXIMUM.

WITH AN

INDIVIDUAL MAXIMUM PENALTY OF 30 YEARS PER


COUNT, SUCH A SENTENCE WOULD BE LESS THAN
1/10 OF THAT RECOMMENDED BY THE GUIDELINES
OR WARRANTED BY HER CRIMES.
THERE COULD BE NO MORE UNJUST RESULT
HERE.
NICOLE VAISEY IS AS CULPABLE AS STEPHEN
HOWELLS FOR EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THE 10
COUNTS TO WHICH SHE PLED GUILTY.
10 COUNTS
WHILE NICOLE VAISEY COMMITTED HER CRIMES
WITH STEPHEN HOWELLS, HER SENTENCE CAN NOT

Page 12 of 15

BE COMPARED SOLELY TO HIS.

HER ACTIONS

CANNOT BE COMPARED SOLELY WITH HIS.


THESE ARE NOT THE FIRST TWO PEOPLE TO
SEXUALLY EXPLOIT CHILDREN IN THIS DISTRICT.
THEY

ARE

NOT

THE

ONLY

BOYFRIEND/GIRLSFRIEND OR HUSBAND/WIFE PAIR


TO DRUG AND RAPE CHILDREN IN THIS DISTRICT.
THEY ARE NOT THE ONLY TWO PEOPLE TO
EXPLOIT MULTIPLE CHILDREN, OR TO GAIN ACCESS
TO THEIR VICTIMS THROUGH A BETRAYAL OF TRUST.
AND THEY WILL NOT BE THE LAST.
WHAT THEY ARE, HOWEVER, IS THE FIRST TO ADD TO
THEIR COMPLIMENT OF VICTIMS TWO YOUNG GIRLS
THEY ABDUCTED WITH AN INTENT TO KEEP THEM

Page 13 of 15

INDEFINITELY IN A SOUNDPROOF ROOM FOR USE AS


SEX SLAVES.
LESS THAN A LIFE SENTENCE FOR NICOLE
VAISEY UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES 10 COUNTS
- OF EXPLOITING 4 CHILDREN INCLUDING THOSE
SHE KIDNAPPED WOULD SEPARATE HER FROM
THOSE WHO HAVE COME BEFORE HER BY TREATING
HER

MORE

LENIENTLY

FOR

MORE

EGREGIOUS

BEHAVIOR.
IT WOULD SEND A TERRIBLE AND FRIGHTENING
MESSAGE TO THOSE WHO WILL COME AFTER AND
THEY WILL COME -- FOR WHAT IS THE DETERRENT
WHEN LENIENCE IS GIVEN TO ONE WHO COMMITS
SUCH VILE CRIMES MULTIPLE TIMES - OVER AN 11

Page 14 of 15

MONTH PERIOD, CULMINATING WITH A VISCIOUS


KIDNAPPING.
NICOLE VAISEY IS IN NO WAY A VICTIM HERE.
SHE WROTE HER OWN STORY - EVERY DAY
EVERY DAY SHE CONSPIRED WITH STEPHEN
HOWELLS TO FEED THEIR TWISTED NEED FOR
SHOCKINGLY SADISTIC SEXUAL BEHAVIOR.
EVERY DAY SHE CALLED V-3S MOTHER FOR A
SLEEPOVER.
EVERY DAY SHE FILMED HOWELLS RAPE AND
SODOMY OF THE CHILD WHO WAS BROUGHT INTO
THEIR BED THAT NIGHT.
EVERY DAY SHE PLAYED ON HER COMPUTER OR
HER PHONE WHILE HOWELLS RAPED A CHILD IN THE
BED NEXT TO HER
EVERY DAY SHE SHOPPED FOR A KIDNAPPING
VICTIM.
EVERY DAY SHE DID NOT REPORT THAT NIGHTS
ABUSE.

Page 15 of 15

EVERY DAY NICOLE VAISEY ALLOWED AND


PARTICIPATED IN THIS SICKENING LIFESTYLE SHE
WROTE HER OWN SENTENCE.
AND IT IS 300 YEARS.