You are on page 1of 10

1

1. Uji Validitas & Reliability


Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N

Valid
Cases
Excludeda
Total
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

30
0
30

Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Scale Variance if
Item Deleted
Item Deleted
PEKERJAAN BW PULANG
TG JWB PD KERJAAN
ULET MEMBERI PLYNAN PD PASIEN
BERANI MENGAMBIL INISIATIF
SESUAI DGN STANDAR PLYN KES
TD MENJLNKAN TGS DGN BAIK
MELATIH KEMAMPUAN PROF
BRKOMUNIKASI DGN BAIK
TAAT PERATURAN
MNJLNKN TGS SESUAI DGN KEMAMPUAN
DOKUMENTASI
TERAMPIL MENGGUNAKAN ICT

9,97
10,21
9,82
10,18
10,21
10,24
10,00
10,15
9,85
9,64
10,24
10,15

30,530
31,485
28,966
31,216
30,110
32,002
31,625
30,508
32,508
34,051
31,252
31,695

2. Uji Validitas
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N
Alpha
,726

Scale Mean if
Item Deleted

10

Item-Total Statistics
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if
Item Deleted

PIH1

23,80

7,407

,169

,707

PIH2

23,80

7,338

,522

,703

PIH3

23,77

7,082

,582

,693

PIH4

23,73

6,961

,570

,690

PIH5

23,77

7,357

,404

,709

TMK1

20,77

7,220

,492

,701

TMK2

21,00

6,483

,034

,681

TMK3

20,37

3,964

,471

,811

TMK4

21,00

6,621

,475

,691

TMK5

21,80

7,338

,522

,703

Uji Normalitas
N=67
Descriptives
Statistic

Std. Error

Corrected
Item-Total
Correlation
,318
,494
,477
,708
,857
,685
,609
,170
,362
,279
,673
,601

100,0
,0
100,0

Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
,867
,840
,848
,828
,819
,831
,833
,823
,849
,852
,829
,834

Mean
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
TOT_PIH

5,00

Upper Bound

5,93
5,26

Median

5,00

Variance

1,568

Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean

2,847
7,375
19,40

5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Skewness
Kurtosis

TOT_PIH
TOT_TMK

Lower Bound

5% Trimmed Mean

95% Confidence Interval for


Mean
TOT_TMK

5,47

Lower Bound

18,58

Upper Bound

20,22

,427
,833
,400

19,63
20,00
-2,259
4,871

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic
Df
Sig.
Statistic
df
,479
30
,000
,434
30
,475
30
,059
,574
30

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

,229

,427
,833

Sig.
,000
,000

T_tbl df9 dgn alfa 0,05 = 2,26

Uji T-Test (dependent): or (indenpendent)


PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN KOMPUTER TERHADAP EFEKTIFNYA KERJA DALAM
SEMINGGU
DI STIKBA JAMBI
Paired Samples Statistics

Test
Pair 1

Mean
34.00
10.00

SBLM
SSDH

Mean

N
10
10

Std. Deviation
11.499
3.916

Std. Error Mean


3.636
1.238

Paired Samples Test


Paired Differences
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
Std. Error
Std. Deviation
Mean
Lower
Upper

Pair 1

SBLM SSDH

Pair 1

Paired Samples Test


Paired Differences
T
Df
Sig. (2-tailed)
SBLM - SSDH
8.557
9 .000

24.000

8.869

2.805

17.655

30.345

T.Test Indenpendent
PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN KOMPUTER TERHADAP EFEKTIFNYA KERJA DALAM
SEMINGGU
DI STIKBA JAMBI

NILAI BELAJAR

KELOMPOK
Kelas Kontrol
Kelas Eksprimen

Group Statistics
N
Mean
59
73,34
59
76,10

Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean


6,498
,846
4,244
,553

Independent Samples Test


NILAI BELAJAR
Equal variances Equal variances
assumed
not assumed
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of


Means

21,878

Sig.
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
Std. Error Difference

,000
-2,734
116
,007
-2,763
1,010
-4,764
-,761

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Lower
Upper

-2,734
99,874
,007
-2,763
1,010
-4,767
-,758

Uji Wilcoxon
PENGARUH TRAINING KESEHATAN DLM PERSALINAN TERHADAP KELANCARAN DALAM
PERSALINAN
Ranks
N
Negative Ranks
NILAI SETELAH TRAINING

Positive Ranks

- NILAI SEBELUM
TRAINING

Mean Rank
0a

,00

,00

5,50

55,00

10

Ties

0c

Total

10

a. NILAI SETELAH TRAINING < NILAI SEBELUM TRAINING


b. NILAI SETELAH TRAINING > NILAI SEBELUM TRAINING
c. NILAI SETELAH TRAINING = NILAI SEBELUM TRAINING

Test Statisticsa
NILAI
SETELAH
TRAINING NILAI
SEBELUM
TRAINING
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
b. Based on negative ranks.

-2,805b
,005

Sum of Ranks

Uji Mann Whitney U_Test


PENGARUH ASUPAN SUPLEMENT TERHADAP DAYA TAHAN TUBUH ATRLIT SPEDA
Ranks
KELOMPOK

JARAK TEMPUH

Mean Rank

Sum of Ranks

Klp Kontrol

18

9,81

176,50

Klp Eksprimen

18

27,19

489,50

Total

36

Test Statisticsa
JARAK
TEMPUH
Mann-Whitney U
Wilcoxon W
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]
a. Grouping Variable: KELOMPOK
b. Not corrected for ties.

5,500
176,500
-4,964
,000
,000b

1. Uji_Chi Square
HUBUNGAN KUALITAS PEALAYANAN KEPERAWATAN DENGAN
TINGKAT KEPUASAN PASIEN
KUALITAS PELAYANAN KEPERAWATAN * TINGKAT KEPUASAN PASIEN Crosstabulation
TINGKAT KEPUASAN PASIEN
PUAS
KURANG PUAS
KUALITAS
BAIK
Count
34
0
PELAYANAN
Expected Count
22.8
11.2
KEPERAWATAN
% within KUALITAS PELAYANAN
100.0% .0%
KEPERAWATAN
KURANG BAIK
Count
11
22
Expected Count
22.2
10.8
% within KUALITAS PELAYANAN
33.3%
66.7%
KEPERAWATAN
Total
Count
45
22
Expected Count
45.0
22.0
% within KUALITAS PELAYANAN
67.2%
32.8%
KEPERAWATAN
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Df
sided)

Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

Likelihood Ratio

33.748a

.000

30.793

.000

42.813

.000

Fisher's Exact Test


Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Exact Sig. (2sided)

.000
33.244

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.000

.000

67

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.84.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

For cohort TINGKAT


KEPUASAN PASIEN =

3.000

PUAS
N of Valid Cases

67

1.852

4.860

Lower

Upper

2. Uji Chi Square:


HUBUNGAN PENGETAHUAN IBU HAMIL DENGAN
TERTIB MEMERIKSAKAN KEHAMILAN

PENG IBU HAMIL

PENG IBU HAMIL * TERTIB MEMERIKSAKAN KEHAMILAN Crosstabulation


TERTIB MEMERIKSAKAN
KEHAMILAN
IDAK RUTIN
RUTIN
Count
5
0
LUAS
Expected Count
4,3
,7
% within PENG IBU HAMIL
100,0%
0,0%
Count
21
4
SEMPIT Expected Count
21,7
3,3
% within PENG IBU HAMIL
84,0%
16,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

Likelihood Ratio

,923a

,337

,058

,810

1,577

,209

Fisher's Exact Test

Exact Sig. (2sided)

1,000

Linear-by-Linear Association

,892

N of Valid Cases

,345

30

a. 3 cells (75,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value

95% Confidence Interval


Lower

Upper

For cohort TERTIB


MEMERIKSAKAN

1,190

KEHAMILAN = IDAK RUTIN


N of Valid Cases

30

1,003

1,413

Exact Sig. (1sided)

,462

Total
5
5,0
100,0%
25
25,0
100,0%

One Way ANOVA


Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Kemampuan Problem Solving
Levene Statistic

df1

,716

df2
2

Sig.
27

,498

ANOVA
Kemampuan Problem Solving
Sum of Squares
Between Groups

Df

Mean Square

65,000

32,500

Within Groups

191,300

27

7,085

Total

256,300

29

Sig.

4,587

,019

Post Hoc Tests


Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Kemampuan Problem Solving
(I) Kelompok Eksprimen

(J) Kelompok Eksprimen

Mean Difference

Std. Error

(I-J)
Training Videotape

Tukey HSD

Diskusi Film

Kontrol

Training Videotape

LSD

Diskusi Film

Kontrol

Diskusi Film

3,500*

1,190

Kontrol

2,500

1,190

Training Videotape

-3,500*

1,190

Kontrol

-1,000

1,190

Training Videotape

-2,500

1,190

Diskusi Film

1,000

1,190

Diskusi Film

3,500

1,190

Kontrol

2,500*

1,190

Training Videotape

-3,500*

1,190

Kontrol

-1,000

1,190

Training Videotape

-2,500*

1,190

1,000

1,190

Diskusi Film

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Kemampuan Problem Solving
(I) Kelompok Eksprimen

(J) Kelompok Eksprimen

Sig.

95% Confidence
Interval
Lower Bound

Training Videotape

Tukey HSD

Diskusi Film

Kontrol

Training Videotape

LSD

Diskusi Film

Kontrol

Diskusi Film

,018

,55

Kontrol

,109

-,45

Training Videotape

,018

-6,45

Kontrol

,682

-3,95

Training Videotape

,109

-5,45

Diskusi Film

,682

-1,95

Diskusi Film

1,06

Kontrol

,045

,06

Training Videotape

,007*

-5,94

Kontrol

,408

-3,44

Training Videotape

,045*

-4,94

Diskusi Film

,408

-1,44

,007

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Kemampuan Problem Solving
(I) Kelompok Eksprimen

(J) Kelompok Eksprimen

95% Confidence
Interval
Upper Bound

Training Videotape

Tukey HSD

Diskusi Film

Kontrol

Training Videotape

LSD

Diskusi Film

Kontrol

Diskusi Film

6,45*

Kontrol

5,45

Training Videotape

-,55*

Kontrol

1,95

Training Videotape

,45

Diskusi Film

3,95

Diskusi Film

5,94*

Kontrol

4,94*

Training Videotape

-1,06*

Kontrol

1,44

Training Videotape

-,06*

Diskusi Film

3,44

10

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Homogeneous Subsets
Kemampuan Problem Solving
Kelompok Eksprimen

Subset for alpha = 0.05


1

Tukey HSDa

Diskusi Film

10

11,20

Kontrol

10

12,20

Training Videotape

10

Sig.
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 10,000.

12,20
14,70

,682

,109