Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Womens and Childrens Health, Division of Reproductive and Perinatal Health, Karolinska Institutet,
Stockholm, Sweden, 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical College, Trivandrum, India, 3Institute of
Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden,
4
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Section of Psychology and Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Karolinska
Institutet, Stockholm and Sweden Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, and 5Population
Health and Research Institute, Medical College, Trivandrum, India
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate the effect of acupressure administered during the active phase of labor on nulliparous womens ratings of
labor pain. Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting. Public hospital in India. Sample. Seventy-one women randomized to
receive acupressure at acupuncture point spleen 6 (SP6) on both legs during contractions over a 30-minute period
(acupressure group), 71 women to receive light touch at SP6 on both legs during the same period of time (touch group)
and 70 women to receive standard care (standard care group). Methods. Experience of in-labor pain was assessed by visual
analog scale at baseline before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 30, 60 and 120 minutes after treatment. Main
outcome measure. Labor pain intensity at different time intervals after treatment compared with before treatment. Results. A
reduction of in-labor pain was found in the acupressure group and was most noticeable immediately after treatment
(acupressure group vs. standard care group p < 0.001; acupressure group vs. touch group p < 0.001). Conclusion. Acupressure
seems to reduce pain during the active phase of labor in nulliparous women giving birth in a context in which social support and
epidural analgesia are not available. However, the treatment effect is small which suggests that acupressure may be most
effective during the initial phase of labor.
Introduction
Complementary and alternative methods to manage
labor pain have become increasingly popular in
high-income countries and they are often used as a
supplement to rather than a replacement for pharmacological methods such as epidural analgesia (1). In
low-income countries where pharmacological pain
relief may not be available, complementary methods
may be the only option to decrease pain in labor.
Complementary and alternative methods comprise a
wide range of heterogeneous and often sparsely evaluated methods, one of which is acupressure. This
method is built on the same principles as acupuncture, but the needles are replaced by pressure, with the
advantage that no equipment is required and that the
skin is not penetrated.
To our knowledge only two studies have been
published evaluating the effect of acupressure during
labor, one conducted in South Korea and one in
Taiwan (2,3). In the Korean study, it was found
that women who received acupressure at spleen
6 (SP6) which is an acupuncture point located on
the lower leg, rated the labor pain as being less than
the rating given by the women who only received
touch at the same point (2). The results of the
Correspondence: Anna Hjelmstedt, Division of Reproductive and Perinatal Health, Department of Womens and Childrens Health, Retzius vg 13 A, Karolinska
Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: anna.hjelmstedt@ki.se.
1454
A. Hjelmstedt et al.
Statistical analyses
Power was estimated on the principal outcome, i.e.
the womens assessment of in-labor pain, and based
on the results from the acupressure study by Lee et al.
where the womens experience of pain had been
measured on a VAS (2). They compared the pain
scores of 36 women who received acupressure with
those of the 39 women who received touch at
60 minutes after the intervention and found a
1455
Results
The owchart of participants in the study is presented
in Figure 1. Out of 773 women assessed for eligibility,
227 met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen declined to
participate and those who remained were randomized
to APG (n = 71), TG (n = 71) and SCG (n = 71). One
woman in the SCG withdrew after randomization.
Table 1 shows that the women in each group had
similar sociodemographic and obstetric backgrounds.
On average, they were young and fairly well-educated.
Gestational age was, on average, 39 weeks in all three
groups. Induction rates were 32% in APG, 29% in
TG and 26% in SCG. Cervical dilatation before
randomization was around 3.5 cm in all groups. In
spite of pharmacological pain relief being an exclusion
criterion in the study, some women in each group
received either Tramadol, Fortwin/Phenergan or
Morphin/Phenergan before randomization. This
was a deviation from the trial protocol which will
be further discussed below.
The mean (SD) pain scores at baseline were:
62.6 (14.9) in APG, 57.5 (15.9) in TG and
56.7 (16.6) in SCG. Since the difference between
APG and SCG baseline scores was signicant
(p < 0.05), and the difference between APG and
TG was bordering on signicance (p = 0.05), we
chose to compare labor pain intensity at different
time intervals after treatment with the baseline assessment as previously described. Figure 2 shows changes
in pain scores expressed as the mean difference
between the baseline assessment and the followup assessments in respective groups. Some women
gave birth shortly after treatment (corresponding time
1456
A. Hjelmstedt et al.
Table 1. Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of the women in the randomized groups.
Sociodemographic data
Age, years, mean (SD)
Education, years, mean (SD)
Obstetric data
Induction, n
Prostaglandin
Oxytocin
Gestational age, weeks, mean (SD)
Cervical dilatation before randomization, cm, mean (SD)
Pharmacological pain relief before randomizationa, n
APG (n = 71)
TG (n = 71)
SCG (n = 70)
22.4 (2.7)
12.4 (2.4)
22.7 (2.9)
12.0 (2.6)
22.9 (3.4)
11.6 (2.8)
32
31
1
38.7 (1.3)
3.6 (0.9)
9
29
28
1
38.7 (0.8)
3.5 (1.0)
8
26
26
0
38.6 (0.8)
3.4 (0.7)
11
Enrollment
Allocation
Allocated to APG (n = 71)
Received APG (n = 71)
Allocated to TG (n = 71)
Received TG (n = 71)
Follow-Up
Lost to follow-up (n = 0)
Lost to follow-up (n = 0)
Lost to follow-up (n = 0)
Analysis
Analyzed (n = 71)
Analyzed (n = 71)
Analyzed (n = 70)
TG
1457
SCG
16
14
12
VAS score difference, mean (SD)
13.4 (14.7)
n = 40
11.9 (11.5)
n = 50
9.4 (13.1)
n = 39
8.6 (11.6)
n = 55
8.3 (9.6)
n = 60
10
8
4.7 (10.8)
n = 69
6
4
2
4.0 (10.8)
n = 62
2.0 (8.5)
n = 68
1.1 (14.0)
n = 52
0
0.2 (15.4)
n = 39
2
4
6
4.4 (8.1)
n = 69
Immediately
2.8 (11.6)
n = 56
30 minutes
60 minutes
120 minutes
APG (n = 71)
TG (n = 71)
SCG (n = 70)
38
35
55
7
1
8
63
2,981.1 (340.0)
50.1 (0.4)
9.6 (0.6)
37
34
43
17
3
8
53
2,931.8 (379.9)
50.2 (0.7)
9.6 (0.5)
38
40
47
12
4
7
59
2,941.5 (387.8)
50.2 (0.6)
9.7 (0.5)
1458
A. Hjelmstedt et al.
Table 3. Postnatal assessments of labor pain, ability to cope with labor pain and overall experience expressed as mean values on visual analog
scale (VAS).
TG
(n = 71)
APG
(n = 71)
Mean (SD)
SCG
(n = 70)
Mean (SD)
pa
APG vs. TG
pb
TG vs. SCG
pb
Labor pain
Coping with labor pain
Experience of childbirth
74.0 (18.2)
90.1 (15.9)
85.0 (25.0)
78.9 (19.9)
82.3 (19.7)
84.3 (22.8)
84.3 (15.8)
79.2 (20.2)
76.2 (25.2)
0.004
0.002
0.06
0.003
0.002
0.1
0.34
0.04
1.0
0.23
1.0
0.15
Labor pain: 0, no pain at all; 100, much more pain than I could think of. Ability to cope with labor pain: 0, not at all; 100, very well. Experience
of labor: 0, very poor; 100, very good.
a
ANOVA.
b
Bonferroni test.
Note: APG, acupressure group; TG, touch group; SCG, standard care group.
Discussion
We found that acupressure on acupoint SP6 during
contractions reduced the experience of pain intensity
in nulliparous women during the active phase of
labor, whereas pain intensity increased in women
who received light touch or standard care. The effect
of acupressure was most apparent immediately after
treatment but the difference in pain scores compared
with the group receiving only touch and the group
receiving no form of treatment lasted for at least
2 hours. At this point in time the womens pain scores
reached about the same level as before treatment, in
spite of the progression of labor over a period of
2.5 hours. Considering that there was an imbalance
in pain intensity pain scores at baseline between the
groups we chose to calculate mean differences in labor
pain intensity between the baseline assessment and
the follow-up assessments. Despite this initial difference, signicantly higher mean pain ratings were
observed in the SCG in comparison to the APG at
all follow-up assessments except immediately after
the treatment. Similarly, the TG showed numerically
higher pain ratings as compared to the APG at followup assessments, but these differences were not statistically different. Thus, a positive treatment effect of
acupressure in the active phase of labor in nulliparous
women was indicated. Furthermore, this study indicates that acupressure may affect womens retrospective assessment of labor pain, since the women in the
APG remembered having had less pain than the
women in the SCG, and were better able to cope
with the pain than the women in the SCG and the TG,
when asked after the birth. Since the proportions of
women who had received pharmacological pain relief
during labor were equally distributed between the
groups it is not probable that this could have affected
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Manju Chandrika Soman for
acupressure and touch treatments, Aseena
1459
Naseemabeevi and Vrinda Menon for data collection and K.T. Shenoy for advice on study design
and analysis of data. The study was funded by the
Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Karolinska
Institutet and the Center for Health Care Science,
Karolinska Institutet.
Declaration of interest: The authors report no
conicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible
for the content and writing of the paper.
References
1. Waldenstrm U, Irestedt L. Obstetric pain relief and its association with remembrance of labor pain at two months and one
year after birth. J Psychosom Obstet Obstet. 2006;27:14756.
2. Lee MK, Chang SB, Kang DH. Effects of SP6 acupressure on
labor pain and length of delivery time in women during labor.
J Altern Compliment Med. 2004;10:95965.
3. Chung U-L, Hung C-L, Kuo S-C, Huang C-L. Effects of
LI4 and BL67 acupressure on labor pain and uterine contractions in the rst stage of labor. J Nurs Res. 2003;11:25160.
4. Smith CA, Collins CT, Cyna AM, Crowther CA. Complimentary and alternative therapies for pain management in labor.
Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2006;18:CD003521.
5. Bonica J. The Management of Pain. 2nd edn. Lea & Febiger,
Philadelphia, London, 1990. pp. 2107.
6. Melzack R, Wall P. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science.
1965;150:9719.
7. Morgan MM, Whitney PK. Behavioral analysis of diffuse
noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC): antinociception and
escape reactions. Pain. 1996;66:30712.
8. Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous
support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev. 2007;18:CD003766.