You are on page 1of 10

Chapter Nine: CONDEMNED


I have never in my life seen a more farcical writing as the

short work entitled (exactly as is appears on the book),

Some Thought
Comments On The
Subject Of
In The Life Of The

And, this vomit on paper, bound into pages is available from:

The Maranatha Bible Society

P.O. Box 466
Litchfield, MI 49252

First, the pious sounding opening statement; this is more

than a quote; it’s an exact copy from page 2 of the above
mentioned work.


“…for revival in our time. It is as though those past

experiences and what I have learned since the first
publication of this booklet that I wish to once again issue
this effort.

At this stage of my life I am now not quite sure that what

they experienced was true revival, and yet something
happened that cannot be explained by mere observation.
I have therefore drawn some conclusions that may be of
help to the individual believer, if they are open to
suggestions that can change their lives for the better. I
don’t believe God works in any place where doctrine
that is contrary to sound Bible belief is present. I also
don’t believe that God works in a purely emotional state,
for emotion may play a part in revival, it is not the main
result. Unless men and women are drawn to Christ in a
supernatural way, and unless Christ gets all the glory, it
is doubtful that revival is present.

The word revival is not a Biblical term. The words

revive, revived and reviving are all Old Testament terms,
with the exception of two places in the New Testament.
In Romans 7:9 it is said that “sin revived,” and Romans
14:9 where it is written “For to this end Christ both
died, and rose, and revived, that he might be Lord of
both the dead and living.

In light of the forgoing, what do we mean by the term

revival? I would to prefer to call phenomena “spiritual
awakening,” which is what takes place when believers
are convicted by the Holy Spirit and become disturbed
about their own state of being. It is a time when God
works in them a burning desire to conform to what the
Bible teaches about living the Christian life.”

There is one sentence above that is such a colossal farce it

falls off the page:

“I don’t believe God works in any place where

doctrine that is contrary to sound Bible belief is


There are four terms that will be used in my expose’ of this

abomination. The context in which they will be used, just to
make misunderstanding impossible, I will define. They are:

• Corruption
• Perversion
• Twisting
• Denial

Corrupt: Of the six Greek words translated to this English

word I will site only one: #2585, as used by Paul in 2 Cor

Pervert: New Testament word # 1294, used seven times; to


Twist: New Testament word # 4761, used only once by

Peter in 2 Peter 3:16, to wrench- torture

Deny: New Testament word # 720, to contradict, disavow.

My computer bible has 31 matches for this word, the two
most pertinent scriptures are Titus 1:16 and 2 Peter 2:1

Of these four words the one that I want to make the biggest
point about is “Twist”, so, the other three I will simply
reference what I have already written, and all this just
because of the one highlighted sentence from the previous
page. If, what was written on this page lined up with the
antics of the writer AND with the antics of the rest of the
Farceanatha bible Cult I would shout Glory Halleluiah…but
since it DOES NOT, and both the writer and his cult KNOW
that it doesn’t, it’s the biggest FARCE in the world!
Oh…”the writer”…so as to make perfectly clear to whom
this alludes…his most eminent eminence the late Rev. Holy
Farce, a.k.a. Dusty Rhoads.
So without any more of my frothing at the mouth, I present a
question: From the last sentence on page 82, Q: is there a
“place” where “doctrine” contrary to sound biblical
principles is present? To answer this question I suppose I
need to specify BOTH the “doctrine” AND the “sound
biblical principles”.

First word: corrupt. The associated sound biblical principles,

just one verse, Psalms 12:6. For a more detailed list see my
“Clarification”. Now for the “doctrine” held by this ever so
pure cult…This has only been explicitly stated in words by
Henry Dziczkowski, however what this person has so stated
(see “The Incident”) is replete in ALL the written material of
this cult. Namely the corruption of capitalization.

Second word: Pervert. The associated sound biblical

principles; see the list of five verbatim quotes in my Isaiah
1:18 letter, than see the first book written by his holiness,
Progressive Revelation, pages 53 and 306.

Fourth word: Deny. (I’m going to come back to the third

word) See the sixth and seventh chapters of the Book of
Genesis, than see “Revelation Studies~Genesis” pages 88
and 204.

My comments on the above three words are by no means

complete. They are however sufficient to illustrate what a
TOTAL FARCE the writer of this so holy-holy book on
revival is.

Now for “Twisting”

It wouldn’t hurt to quote the only verse wherein this word is

used, it’s 2 Peter 3:16. “…things hard to be understood,
which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest…” I submit

that in ALL of The Word of God, the one singular truth, if

twisted, is the worst sin…i.e. Blasphemy of the Holy
Ghost…is…”THE GOSPEL”. That is of course, “The
Gospel According to the Scriptures”. Ohhhh…his extra holy
Farceness would never-never-never do that…would he!!

A categorical statement “Paul calls his gospel the gospel of

peace”, one of several places this profound utterance is made
is in “Revelation Studies~Ephesians” page 269 line 15.
Excuse me, excuse me…what is said in the paragraph that
precedes this “truth”?

1. The writer quotes Romans 10:15, this to bring

attention to “beautiful feet”

2. The writer than explains the GREEK word # 5611

I suppose I’m not supposed to notice that in Paul’s letter to

the Romans in the #1 reference above that Paul states “As it
is written…” referring to the book of Isaiah, chapter 52,
verse 7. The HEBREW word translated as beautiful is O.T.
#4998, which has no relation whatever to this skolar’s
explanation of the Greek word #5611.

Let me approach this from another vantage point. I will make

a categorical statement: “Dusty Rhoads does not know what
the gospel of peace is” I find somewhat amusing that the
Spring 1995 conference from which the whole section of this
book (Revelation Studies~Ephesians) was taken (starting at
page 242, and ending at page 295), DOES NOT ADDRESS
the “feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace). In
fact Rev. Holy Farce so states ON TAPE, that this item of
armor was skipped!!

Before I proceed any farther, I issue a challenge…GET THE

TAPES AND PROVE ME WRONG! Furthermore, this tape
I am alluding to is not the only place that I have heard this.
A very short digression, in my above references of pages
242~295 something fell off the page…page 287, line 8. In
my other letters I have pointed out the “Farceness” of what
this sack of skin filled with shit calls scholarship…now, not
only that, but he can’t even make a correct reference!

Back to “twisting”…so, he doesn’t know what “the gospel of

peace is”, to explain it away, how convenient to twist it to
mean the “gospel of the grace of God” (By the way, I do
know what the gospel of peace is…I will NOT tell you…you
see that would violate Mathew 7:6)

The conclusion of my expose’ of the above four words:

Dusty Rhoads takes the most precious gift given to man, The
Word of God…he corrupts it, he perverts it, he denies it and
he twists it. And ALL of you lovey-dovey chunks of the
carcass of kryist never noticed… BURN IN HELL!!

Below is copied from page 14

“False and misleading statements, misquoted Scripture,

passages taken out of context and any outer means
employed by man that is not Biblical will not be honored
by our God. Plain Biblical truths can never be replaced
as God’s main in bringing about and maintaining
revival. There is so little honesty in pulpits today that we
need not look far and wide for the cause of spiritual
declension. Illustrations and stories that are designed to
bring emotional upheaval will never bring heartfelt and
lasting conviction.”

I’m not done, this paper is a condemnation of the short book

on Revival


The forgoing was just from one farcical sentence from page
two of this abomination, the below is copied from page 28.

“In January 1990, I was facing my first year alone after

having shared a life with a human companion. I knew I
had to find some ground upon which I could build my
life, so I sat down and wrote out a list of things that
would be a part of my life from that point on. Some I had
already used, but this was an entirely different story. So,
in additions to the guidelines used in “Rivers of Living
Water” I included these thoughts that came to me in the
first month of 1990.”

Now see my letter “Isaiah 1:18 continuation” (the portion

specifically addressed to Jim Motylinski), the section of that
letter that exposes a peculiar anatomical anomaly of the late
Rev. Holy Farce, namely the location of his brain… Now
read this…it’s a copy from page 29:

“I determined that I would never get involved with

anything of anybody until I evaluated it thoroughly and
could see where it was leading. I had observed this in my
life before, I would have avoided many pitfalls and

Never mind that he re-marries, never mind that the woman to

whom me marries is twenty-three years his junior…WHAT
HAPPENS?? She leaves him!! WHY!? Pray tell?

It couldn’t have a thing to do with the time wherein this

occurred being when VIAGRA was not yet invented…Could
it !!

This little book transcends both the connotation and the

denotation of the word FARCE! One last thing, below is
copied from page 23:

“Elijah brought down the wrath of Jezebel by his
preaching. John the Baptist lost his head because he
named the sin of Herod. Paul died after a long prison
term because he refused to soften his message. It has
always been so, and today is no different.”

I wonder if all of you farces put together will have one peep
to rebut me!


Richard E. Rhoades touted himself about his sound doctrine.

He touted himself on study-study-study, he very often told us
how he would study all night, implying that anyone whishing
to be as brilliant, as he liked to come across, should do
likewise. He touted himself about his “sound mind”…yes-
sir-ee, you can’t have a sound mind unless you are a member
of the Maranatha Bible Society, and therefore have the mind
of Christ (I Corinthians 2:16).

The relation of this short essay to the forgoing is just one

more facet, as ascribed to R.E.R., of the word Farce.

The Age of Accountability

I heard this with my own two ears. What follows may seem
piddlingly insignificant, but when it is taken within a
framework of a fellowship that touts themselves on studying,
on sound doctrine, on rightly dividing the word of truth, it
illustrates how well this congregation of farces actually
accomplishes what they say.

During one of what these people call their mini conferences,

a question arose:

What happens to babies when they die?


This question was because of the difference in theology

between Calvinism and Arminianism. I will accept the
answer given by Richard A. Rhoades; which was:

If they are elect to babies they go to heaven, and if they are

not elect babies, they go to Hell.

Dusty Rhoades went on to further elaborate on what is

termed the age of accountability. It was his contention that
the Arminian answer to the above question would be; that if
a person has not yet reached the age of accountability, and
they die, they go to heaven.

The point of this whole mindset is that Dusty Rhoades

professed that the age of accountability does not exist, he
further went on to elaborate, that nowhere in the Bible is
there anything referencing an age of accountability...this also
is on tape.

An example of how well this fellowship studies; explain

Deuteronomy 1:13