11 views

Uploaded by bm.over2933

Santilli, Ruggero Maria.
Elementary introduction to Isonumbers ( generalization of the unit 1 ) 5pages Conference paper

save

- visit 1 lesson plan 11 2f5
- Introducing Numbers
- vanspronsen projectthreemi unitplan
- Mf 2010 Student Awards
- standard 2 3
- lesson plan
- HowtoTeach7X856SoAllStudentsCanSucceed
- Multiplication Five Minute Frenzy Left4 0212 All
- class3mathematicsreview1[1]
- Simplifying Algebraic Expressions
- New Microsoft Word Document
- elem_3_math
- investigation 1
- UKCHAP10
- Experiment 1a
- emt_standards_ed_hw.pdf
- Group 8
- brendaadams differentiated scenario assignment
- analysis1_07_syllabus
- Functions
- Excel_imp
- Copy of Excel_tutor
- em
- curriculum chart
- brendaadams differentiated scenario assignment
- welcome ppt grade 2
- Maths quest 8.pdf
- 52_PharoByExample
- newsletter raab
- Statport Format-
- Bertoni. Poggi.teobaldo. Quince Premisas
- Unidad 1 Presentar
- World
- How to lie with Statistics- Darrel Huff.pdf
- Medicina Indu
- 01-final-silabus-ekonomi-x-update-10052013.docx
- Kurs Rysowania Postaci z Kreskówek - Christopher Hart
- IEC 62560 2011 2011_07_04.pdf
- Petitorio de choferes autoconvocados de Ersa en Corrientes
- Submódulo 2.2
- Modernisasi Pembangunan Adalah Pembangunan Yg Menyatakan Bahwa Pembangunan Dapat Dicapai Melalui Mengikuti Proses Pengembangan Yang Digunakan Oleh Negara
- 1822- Laurentino Gomes
- Prácticas-Desafíos y Oportunidades de Primaria Digital
- EJEMPLOS DE ARTÍCULOS CIENTÍFICOS DEL VOLCÁN COTOPAXI
- Fichas Taller Orientacion Vocacional
- WHO_HSE_EPR_2008_2BahasaI.pdf
- cv maru
- R-063-2011-OS-CD.pdf
- La-implementación-de-la-Agenda-2030-se-ha-organizado-en-tres-niveles.docx
- Khazina e Ruhaniyaat (July'2018)
- Agen Poker Online Terbaru 2018
- regulamento circuito regional trail 2018 d
- Modelos de Solicitud
- format pengkajian anak.docx
- 2018 9 Ottobre Ordinan2018 9 OTTOBRE ORDINANZA REQUISIZIONE LOCULO A BRUNO GIOVANNI LOTTO 28 A DELIBERA 156 1975 CONTR 219 1986 GAMBINO IOLANDA MORTA PALERMO14 09 18 za Requisizione Loculo a Bruno Giovanni Lotto 28 a Delibera 156 1975 Contr 219 1986 Gambino Iolanda Morta Palermo14 09 18 Pag 10
- Mayora Indah Tbk Audited Financial Statements 2017
- lumi
- Analisis DP Soal UAS
- Kanker Radio 2015.docx
- 2018 Bar Examinations
- Mechanics 1887 Isaac Todhunter
- Pure Mathematics (Sixth Form) Vol.2
- Deborin-Secrets-of-the-Second-World-War-Progress-1971.pdf
- Abraham Adrian Albert by Nathan Jacobson
- Pure Mathematics for Sixth Forms Vol.1
- Hydrostatics by T. v. Venkatachari
- Hobson's Trigonometry 4th.ed b w
- English to Hindi Dictionary
- Higher Euclidean Geometry J.(ohn) W.(ellesley) Russell Rev. Ed 1905
- angelomingarelli.pdf
- Intermediate Statics Das & Mukherjee 8th.ed (1958)
- Statics Isaac Todhunter 1887
- Higher Euclidean Geometry Lachlan 1893
- Deborin-Secrets-of-the-Second-World-War-Progress-1971.pdf
- NumberTheory History Vol.1 Leonard E. Dickson 1919
- Ceva and Menelaus Theorem
- Indian Christians of St. Thomas 1908
- Egyptians Used to Get High as Part of Rituals
- A Treatise on the Geometry of the Circle 1891
- Physics B.D. Chhabra 2nd.ed 1932 (Lahore,India)
- Psychic Powers of Ants & Other Insects 1904
- History of Physics Max Von Laue 1950
- Algebra for Highschools Colleges Amanda E Hayes 1897
- 150 Nice Geometry Problems
- Superluminal Special Relativity
- THeory-of-Fubctions-of a Cmplex Variable E. T. Copson 1935
- An Algebraic Treatise on Max. &Min 1850 Calcutta
- Elementary Analytical Statics 6th.ed S.R. Gupta (New Delhi,India)1960
- Aug-Sep1992.pdf

You are on page 1of 5

net/publication/260186033

**Is a new arithmetic growing?
**

CONFERENCE PAPER · JANUARY 2007

READS

11

2 AUTHORS:

Raúl M. Falcón

Juan Núñez Valdés

Universidad de Sevilla

Universidad de Sevilla

101 PUBLICATIONS 112 CITATIONS

142 PUBLICATIONS 247 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

**All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate,
**

letting you access and read them immediately.

SEE PROFILE

**Available from: Raúl M. Falcón
**

Retrieved on: 01 January 2016

the main goal of this paper is to show that these roles last fact could be discussed by redefining the usual mathematical laws. named numbers are related between themselves by different laws. that is: a × 1 = 1 × a = a. One of the main reasons for these elements to be fundamental is their roles of uniqueness within any mathematical structure. and so on. Secondly. These two unit elements and such a property allow to form in our mind the idea of a mathematical structure. later R and C. and we are also taught that + and × are related between themselves by the distributive property. we are taught to multiply and. 2. All these sets have something in common: elements 0 and 1 are the unit elements in all of them. we are told that the symbol × represents the multiplication or product and that the unit element of this law is 1. . In the first place. Aptdo 1160. NU ´ NEZ ˜ R. we have been aware of the existence of unit elements. in the way that each type of them extends the previous one. children included.. At the same time. So. we do not pretend to discuss the importance of such unit elements. which do the same with respect to the inverse of a Z-number. quite more in agreement with some aspects of the reality. which means that: a + 0 = 0 + a = a. Introduction Since our more youthful years. we are been taught to count one-to-one: 1.Is a new arithmetic growing? ´ and J. However. 4. . in a similar way as before. whichever the number a is. Faculty of Mathematics. Later. that is to say. we are told that these elements. we learn to add. firstly from one to one: 1 + 1 = 2. Q-numbers..es jnvaldes@us. 2 + 1 = 3.. University of Seville. FALCON Department of Geometry and Topology. M. Teachers tell us that the symbol + represents the addition and that such a law has an unit element: the zero (0). but. rafalgan@us. Here.es Abstract It is not exaggerated to say that all of the people. we easily understand that several types of numbers have to be consecutively appearing: Z-numbers. with respect to the two laws previously indicated. 42-46 . 41080-Seville (Spain). which get round the problem of computing the opposite of a N-number.. we do not try to put in doubt the transcendence or their uniqueness. why have these 1 International Conference on Dynamical systems ICDS 2007. 3. know the important role played by the elements 0 and 1 in Mathematics.

How long the equality 2 × 2 = 4? is going to be imposed to us? Naturally. such as matrices. it is sufficiently proved that (R3 . instead of 1 ? or why not to define: a × 6 √ = 6√ × a = a? Note that 7 7 7 5 √ could be in fact any real number. vector fields. for instance. ×) Universe. 2 . someone told us that 2 × 2 = 1 (mod 3). if 6 √ is even an irrational number!). although we have chosen it to do more amazing this 6 7 subject. etc. some theories. by logic (please. the laws + and × should be redefined to accept other units. To get a better understanding of these subjects. a trivial (left. and other systems. Why do we have to restrict the imagination of our students by obliging them to accept the unique possibility 2 × 2 = 4? Can it be thought that in our world this is truly so? Note that. right) unit I = +1 and on an ordinary associative product between generic quantities a. However. stars. what we call unit: 1 0 I3 = 0 1 0 0 is not a real model for understanding the 0 0 1 is not such an unit in the physical consideration of Universe. more generally. This is the case for all systems historically called interior dynamical systems. thus solely representing a finite number of isolated point-particles with action-at-a-distance forces derivable from a potential. even. b of a given set. molecules. strongly interacting particles (such as protons and neutrons). 5 by notation or.elements to be precisely the 0 and the 1 and not others different? For example. local differential (beginning from its topology). The latter systems cannot be consistently reduced to a finite number of isolated point-particles. Such a Mathematics is known to be linear. Well. nuclei. let us redefine them. but this response would not satisfy to us either. a most 7 serious response would be to say that. nonlocal (of integral and other type) and not completely representable with a Hamiltonian in the coordinates of the experimenter. Indeed. Therefore. why not 5 5 5 consider 6 √ . let us say that Mathematics generally used in quantitative sciences of the 20-th century were based on ordinary fields with characteristic zero. In fact. By contrast. and Hamiltonian. the mathematics so effective for exterior systems is only approximate at best for interior systems. 1 Do others possibilities exist? It is reasonable to think that 0 and 1 are the unit elements for different reasons: by agreement. we do not want to reduce our sets of numbers. if we think in Mathematics as a tool to understand the Universe. have already become phased out. of all the so-called exterior dynamical systems in which all constituents can be well approximated as being point-like. Such a Mathematics was proved to provide an exact and invariant representation of planetary and atomic systems as well as. like Relativity. such as the structure of: planets. In fact. +. in any case. the great majority of systems in the physical reality are nonlinear.

which. b Apart from that.. since the named genomathematics and hypermathematics are being also dealt). when a group of theoretical physicists began to construct a new mathematical foundation. Many other examples can be shown. m. where × Obviously. density. If we think in an equality already considered in this paper. To distinguish between isonumber and conventional number.. like coordinates. that the unit elements remain invariable. as it actually happens. it is immediate to note that b 1 = 1 × I = I ∈ R. although the dependence of external factors for the unit elements (named isounits) is now allowed. 5 it is sufficient for our aim to realize that the answer to the question: “can I = 6 √ be the 7 unit element of the real numbers with respect to the product?” is affirmative. b 6=6 × 6 5 √ 7 = √5 7 = (2 × 3) × 6 5 √ 7 bb =b 2× 3.For these reasons. That is. It is formed by the same set of elements as the initial one. as we have previously mentioned. Such a construction makes possible that these new mathematics put all together the usual ones. In this way. as a part of this new construction. but it depends on several external factors. it is necessary to keep in mind that the unit has not got the exclusive character from which it is always presupposed. Then. the field of the real numbers R and let us suppose that we wish to construct the set of isonumbers associated with R. as a particular case. to redefine the usual product. aceleration. even with no necessity of referring to hole black dynamic or to EinsteinPodolski-Rosen’s paradox. Let us fixe. .). is unique. but we have to consider it variable: I3 = I3 (x. speed.. which will allow us to answer the question above formulated. since they admit. the following computations are obtained: b 2=2 × 6 5 √ 7 = 3 5 √ 7 = (2 × 1) × 6 5 √ 7 bb =b 2× 1. begins with a step by step construction of new mathematical structures (named isostructures) verifying the same axioms and properties as usual ones. 3 . temperature. . However. it will be necessary Then. In any case. the unit matrix above indicated is not constant. which consists on a generalization of the current mathematics. by agreement. which constitutes a difference with the case of Z3 . known as Isomathematics [4]. any real number could have been chosen as unit. which is. This new set will be denoted by R a = a × I : a ∈ R}. the first ones will be written by using bold characters. x. This new theory. which can be made in the following way: b a× b is now named isoproduct. The question is how can we vary a mathemathical unit. under such a choice. we will show next the construction in a schematic way of the isonumbers. which is not curiously the biggest possible. for instance. which have an arbitrary real number b and it is defined: R b = {b I as isounit. a new mathematical structure has been reached. Particularly. b bb = (a × b) × I. t.. b 3=3 × 6 5 √ 7 = 2 5 √ 7 = (3 × 1) × 6 5 √ 7 bb =b 3× 1. since. A possible response to this question appeared in 1980. all these changes must be accompanied by the use of new laws [1]. ˙ x¨. at present. note that the choice of such an element I is merely anecdotal.

423. Falc´on and J. Isorings and related isostructures. M. N´ un ˜ez. the prediction of the existence of the antimatter and. Hadronic Journal 1 (1978). J. M. without working in Z3 . a possible generalization of Einstein’s Relativity Theory. Jiang. AmericaEurope-Asia. B. M. N´ un ˜ez. among many other subjects. it is not hazardous to affirm that we are dived in the beginnings of a new arithmetic which could supply non imaginable facts in a non distant future. International Academic Press. Isominkowskian geometry for the gravitational treatment of matter and its isodual for antimatter. La isoteor´ıa de Santilli. for instance. Santilli. [4] R. 351 . [5] R. named hadronic energy. R. On a posible Lieadmisible covering of the Galilei Relativity in Newtonian Mechanics for nonconservative and Galilei noninvariant systems. 437 . we would have now. 223 . in Florida. Fermats Theorem and Goldbachs Conjecture. Modern Phys. M. as a consequence. The main driving of this project is R.X. for instance). of the antigravity. Santilli. Intern. References [1] R. [2] R. ISBN 1-57485-055-5 (2001). ISBN 1-58485-056-3 (2002). have involved. International Academic Press. according with the previous exposition. [3] C. For a more complete information about all of the subjects here comented the reader can consult both the text and the references of [3. under the new conditions. Bollettino dell’ Unione Matematica Italiana 8-B (2005).bb √ . Nowadays. Moreover.407. due to the use of prime numbers. It requires a first step by step construction of each usual mathematical structures (see [2]. America-Europe-Asia. We think that this impression should be transmitted to young students to extend their minds and to allow them to elaborate their own conjectures about this new situation. 4 . the appearance of a new cleaning energy. 4 2 Final conclusions We would like to conclude the paper by commenting that the changes previously described.M. Foundations of Santillis Isonumber Theory With Applications to New Crytograms. So. Santilli. that b 2× 2 = 310 7 bb not difficult to prove that b 2× 2 = 1 when I = 1 is the isounit. at present President of the I. which can seem very simple and non transcendent. it is 2 × 2 = 4. D:17 (1998). the modification of the Einstein-Podolski-Rosen’s Theory and the generation of new codification theories. Falc´on and J. mathematicians and physicist throughout the world are trying to endow this new theory with a right mathematical foundation which makes it serious and consistent.452. 5].

- visit 1 lesson plan 11 2f5Uploaded byapi-403436342
- Introducing NumbersUploaded byMahobe
- vanspronsen projectthreemi unitplanUploaded byapi-239505795
- Mf 2010 Student AwardsUploaded byPreetham Madapura
- standard 2 3Uploaded byapi-318707664
- lesson planUploaded byapi-251757504
- HowtoTeach7X856SoAllStudentsCanSucceedUploaded bycarlaclark
- Multiplication Five Minute Frenzy Left4 0212 AllUploaded byvicnesh834457
- class3mathematicsreview1[1]Uploaded byGuruprasad Acharya
- Simplifying Algebraic ExpressionsUploaded byprashant
- New Microsoft Word DocumentUploaded byFarjad Saeed
- elem_3_mathUploaded byChew Peng Teoh
- investigation 1Uploaded byapi-320878080
- UKCHAP10Uploaded byChaitu Samudrala
- Experiment 1aUploaded bymallikharjunag
- emt_standards_ed_hw.pdfUploaded bymaleckisale
- Group 8Uploaded byTrang Pham
- brendaadams differentiated scenario assignmentUploaded byapi-416163731
- analysis1_07_syllabusUploaded byMihai Rapcea
- FunctionsUploaded byAnsar Ali
- Excel_impUploaded bysanyu1208
- Copy of Excel_tutorUploaded bymugilanit
- emUploaded byMSUIIT
- curriculum chartUploaded byapi-295546924
- brendaadams differentiated scenario assignmentUploaded byapi-416163731
- welcome ppt grade 2Uploaded byapi-233685556
- Maths quest 8.pdfUploaded byH
- 52_PharoByExampleUploaded bylop1234
- newsletter raabUploaded byapi-352652014
- Statport Format-Uploaded byJoshua

- Mechanics 1887 Isaac TodhunterUploaded bybm.over2933
- Pure Mathematics (Sixth Form) Vol.2Uploaded bybm.over2933
- Deborin-Secrets-of-the-Second-World-War-Progress-1971.pdfUploaded bybm.over2933
- Abraham Adrian Albert by Nathan JacobsonUploaded bybm.over2933
- Pure Mathematics for Sixth Forms Vol.1Uploaded bybm.over2933
- Hydrostatics by T. v. VenkatachariUploaded bybm.over2933
- Hobson's Trigonometry 4th.ed b wUploaded bybm.over2933
- English to Hindi DictionaryUploaded bybm.over2933
- Higher Euclidean Geometry J.(ohn) W.(ellesley) Russell Rev. Ed 1905Uploaded bybm.over2933
- angelomingarelli.pdfUploaded bybm.over2933
- Intermediate Statics Das & Mukherjee 8th.ed (1958)Uploaded bybm.over2933
- Statics Isaac Todhunter 1887Uploaded bybm.over2933
- Higher Euclidean Geometry Lachlan 1893Uploaded bybm.over2933
- Deborin-Secrets-of-the-Second-World-War-Progress-1971.pdfUploaded bybm.over2933
- NumberTheory History Vol.1 Leonard E. Dickson 1919Uploaded bybm.over2933
- Ceva and Menelaus TheoremUploaded bybm.over2933
- Indian Christians of St. Thomas 1908Uploaded bybm.over2933
- Egyptians Used to Get High as Part of RitualsUploaded bybm.over2933
- A Treatise on the Geometry of the Circle 1891Uploaded bybm.over2933
- Physics B.D. Chhabra 2nd.ed 1932 (Lahore,India)Uploaded bybm.over2933
- Psychic Powers of Ants & Other Insects 1904Uploaded bybm.over2933
- History of Physics Max Von Laue 1950Uploaded bybm.over2933
- Algebra for Highschools Colleges Amanda E Hayes 1897Uploaded bybm.over2933
- 150 Nice Geometry ProblemsUploaded bybm.over2933
- Superluminal Special RelativityUploaded bybm.over2933
- THeory-of-Fubctions-of a Cmplex Variable E. T. Copson 1935Uploaded bybm.over2933
- An Algebraic Treatise on Max. &Min 1850 CalcuttaUploaded bybm.over2933
- Elementary Analytical Statics 6th.ed S.R. Gupta (New Delhi,India)1960Uploaded bybm.over2933
- Aug-Sep1992.pdfUploaded bybm.over2933