You are on page 1of 1

AS SIGNM ENT RUBRIC

This assignment will be marked based on your ability to:


1)
communicate
understanding
of
2)
made
connections
between
3) provide a critical analysis.

ideas
course

and
content

concepts
and

in
own

the
practice;

chapter
and

The following rubric will be used to assess your performance:

TIT LE: HBEM 4203 JAN 2015


C ATEGORY

WEIGHTAGE

Introduction

The introduction is
interesting. It previews the
structure and objectives of
the paper clearly. Important
concepts are also clearly
defined.

The introduction previews


the structure of the paper
and its objectives clearly.

The introduction does not


adequately preview the
structure of the paper but
clearly states its
objectives or vice-versa.

The introduction is brief


and not focused on the
structure and objectives of
the paper.

The introduction
is missing.

Data Collection
Method

Describes in detail the


processes and rationale on
respondents' selection, the
interviews conducted and
the documents and records
studied.

Describes in sufficient details


the processes and rationale
on respondents' selection,
the interviews conducted,
and the documents and
records studied.

Brief description on the


processes of identifying
respondents and the
conduct of interviews.

Brief mention of data


collection but without
adequate focus on of the
respondent selection,
interviews and study of
documents and records.

There is no
description on
how data is
collected.

Description on
a selected
programme

A detailed description is
provided in terms of its
objectives, rationales and at
least FOUR main features or
characteristics.

A detailed description is
provided in terms of its
objectives, rationales and at
least SIX main features or
characteristics.

A detailed description is
provided in terms of its
objectives, rationales and
at least TWO main
features or
characteristics.

A description is provided in
terms of its objectives,
rationales and at least ONE
main feature or
characteristic.

No programme
description
provided.

Reviewing
Planning
activities

Main features of planning


activities are described in
detail and reviewed.
Student's own impressions
are included.

Main features of planning


activities are described in
detail and reviewed.

Some features of planning


activities are described in
detail.

Some features of planning


activities are described in
general terms.

No reviewing of
planning
activities
provided.

Reviewing
Organising
activities

Main features of how the


programme is organised are
described in detail and
reviewed. Student's own
impressions are included.

Main features of how the


programme is organised are
described in detail and
reviewed.

Some features of how the


programme is organised
are described in detail.

Some features of how the


programme is organised
are described in general
terms.

No description or
review of
programme
organisation is
provided.

Reviewing
Directing
activities

Important actions of
management in directing or
leading the programme are
described in detail and
reviewed. Student's own
impressions are included.

Important actions of
management in directing or
leading the programme are
described in detail and
reviewed.

Important actions of
management in directing
or leading the programme
are described in detail.

Important actions of
management in directing
or leading the programme
are described in general
terms.

No description or
review of
directing or
leading activities
is provided.

Reviewing
Controlling
activities

Important actions of
management in controlling
the programme are
described in detail and
reviewed. Student's own
impressions are included.

Important actions of
management in controlling
the programme are described
in detail and reviewed.

Important actions of
management in
controlling the
programme are described
in detail.

Important actions of
management in controlling
the programme are
described in general terms.

No description or
review of
controlling
activities is
provided.

Evaluation of
programme
effectiveness

Evaluates in terms of
programme objectives and
the general impressions of
the respondents. Student's
own impressions are
included.

Evaluates in terms of
programme objectives and
the general impressions of
the respondents.

Only evaluates in terms of


EITHER programme
objectives OR the general
impressions of the
respondents.

Evaluation is made but


based on criteria which are
unclear.

No evaluation
presented.

Conclusion

The conclusion is strong. It


ties up/ brings together the
above SIX elements of the
study. Well summarised.

The conclusion ties up/


brings together the above SIX
elements of the study.

The conclusion is
recognisable, but does
not tie up the SIX
elements of the study.

There is no clear
conclusion, the papers just
ends.

No conclusion
presented.

Organisation

Details are placed in a


logical order and presented
effectively. The paper is
interesting.

Details are placed in a logical


order but presented less
effectively.

Details are not in logical


order and distracts the
reader.

Many details are not in


logical order. There is little
sense that the writing is
organised.

Not Applicable.