Buzz: Can anyone challenge the tour's top seeds in 2016?

Because you were exceptionally good over the thrilling 2015 tennis season, we have a reward for
you:
The 2016 season, which has just begun in Brisbane, Australia.
By Monday, there will be no fewer than six ATP World Tour and WTA tournaments underway in five
different countries -- New Zealand, China, India, Qatar and Australia, where the season's first major,
the Australian Open, begins in only two weeks.
And this isn't merely a soft open -- there are six top-10 men in action and seven on the women's side.
No. 1-ranked Novak Djokovic and No. 5 Rafael Nadal (Doha) and No. 3 Roger Federer (Brisbane)
headline the action. Nos. 2, 3, and 4 -- Simona Halep, Garbine Muguruza and Maria Sharapova -- are
also playing in Brisbane.
No. 4 Stan Wawrinka is in Chennai, while No. 5 Agnieszka Radwanska, No. 6 Petra Kvitova and
Eugenie Bouchard are all scheduled for the Shenzhen Open.
You're welcome.
To commemorate the occasion, our resident tennis aficionados, Peter Bodo and Greg Garber, throw
out some Opening Day thoughts regarding things we might see in 2016.
Peter Bodo: Greg, Happy New Year. However, when it comes to 2016 and Serena Williams, I fully
expect to see more of the same-old, same-old -- if that's any way to describe Serena's exploits. I
believe that in 2016, she'll focus on two related goals: a calendar-year Grand Slam (to make up for
the one that got away in 2015) and surpassing Steffi Graf as the Open era's all-time Grand Slam
singles champ. (With 21 titles, Williams trails Graf by just one.) What? Another Grand Slam run?
Sure, why not?
Granted, Williams' age of 34 is an inescapable reality. But she's a superior, once-in-a-lifetime
specimen, different from but comparable to Federer. She's been off and (presumably) resting and
taking care of herself since last September. She's demonstrated she doesn't need to play week-in,
week-out to be sharp. She can cherry-pick her events and take care of her body. There's no reason
why, with her resources and team, she can't get another great year out of that magnificent power
plant. Besides, who's going to stop her?
If 2015 was Serena's year of high drama, 2016 could be the year when she makes an emphatic, calm
career-closing statement.
Greg Garber: Mr. Bodo, as much as I enjoyed Serena's run through the women's field a year ago, I
am sensing it's time for a shift in the dynamic at the top. Yes, Serena won all but one of her Grand
Slam matches, but that one was telling. Feeling the weight of a potential calendar-year Grand Slam,
she fell to Roberta Vinci in the semifinals of the US Open. At her age, you can't help but wonder if,
going forward, nerves will be a permanent part of her game. It's time for Victoria Azarenka, Halep,
Kvitova and, yes, even Bouchard to assert some authority.
Peter Bodo: Williams' challenge isn't finding a new goal, but finding motivation to achieve it. But

that's fairly common for hall-of-fame grade players.

Novak Djokovic has what might be called a "Serena problem." Put most simply, it is: "What do I do
for an encore?"
But I'm not worried about Djokovic in that regard. He seems utterly dedicated to the game, and
more than comfortable in his new role as the alpha dog of men's tennis. In fact, he seems to enjoy
that role far more than most of us had anticipated back when he seemed more than happy clowning
around, the third-wheel on all those Roger Federer-Rafael Nadal dates.
The real issue for the ATP men in 2016 is, "Can anyone stop this guy?" Andy Murray is coming off a
dream year and up to a career-high No. 2, but Djokovic crushes him routinely (21-9, including 10 of
their last 11 meetings). No. 3 Federer has been a thorn in Djokovic's side, but in five-set matches the
result is never more than a flesh wound.
Wawrinka upset Djokovic in the French Open final last year and probably will spend the rest of his
career paying for the impertinence. (Djokovic already leads their non-rivalry 19-4.) And Nadal
presently has hands full with the likes of Fabio Fognini -- never mind Djokovic.
This may be the year that Djokovic, who at age 28 has 10 Grand Slam titles, sets himself up to make
a run at Federer's record 17 majors. It's hard to envision him not winning at least two.
Greg Garber: I have no doubt Djokovic will contend for each of the four majors, beginning in
Melbourne, where he has won five times in the past eight years. And at this point, it's probably safe
to assume the 34-year-old Federer will be a regular at Grand Slam semifinals -- that is with the
exception of the French Open, where he won't have played any tune-ups heading into the year's lone
clay major.
No, my eyes are on Nadal. He turns 30 years old at the French Open (an old 30), and I'm wondering
if he can pull together another major run, most likely in Paris. Can he win his 15th major and
distance himself from the great Pete Sampras and edge closer to Federer's total of 17?
Peter Bodo:Nadal ended the year playing with some of the aplomb that we've come to see for years.
But he showed vulnerability all year -- and not just physical. He was candid about his mental
weaknesses all year. He's going to need a quick start in 2016 to regain his once unshakable
confidence.
But the ATP is richer in superstars, even if Nadal fails to regain his mojo. My question: Who on the
WTA will step up and show she can not only play with Williams, but perhaps be a successor? Maybe
not a 21-Slam, two-wins-from-a-calendar-year Grand Slam successor, but a reliable, dedicated,
focused, professional who loves what she does and has the ability to dominate most of her peers
most of the time.
It's fairly amazing that the WTA has produced no such player -- not even one operating in the
shadow of Williams.
Perhaps Sharapova might still become that sure-handed player, but her inconsistency and those
recurring injury problems will be a lot to overcome. Simona Halep, loved as she is, shrinks into her
already-small self in big matches. Kvitova has been an enigma rigged to explode unexpectedly. I
could go on, but you get the point.

I see two possible solutions to the WTA's dilemma in the near term: Muguruza, who has an
appropriately big game and seems to have cultivated an appetite for success, and -- potentially -- a
rejuvenated Azarenka.
Greg Garber: But that's far from a guarantee. Remember three years ago around this time? Sloane
Stephens got off to a tremendous start in Brisbane, knocking off No. 15 Dominika Cibulkova in the
first around, reaching the quarters before losing to Serena. Stephens beat Williams, memorably, in
the quarterfinals of the Aussie Open before losing to Azarenka in the semifinals. That year, Stephens
went 15-4 in the Slams and, at the age of 20, looked like a force for the near future. This past year
she was 5-4 in the Slams, including two first-round losses. I'm curious to see how Stephens, who
turns 23 in March, fares.
Peter Bodo: The unknowns are vast, especially in this current era dominated by a handful of
superstars. It seems like just yesterday that Pete Sampras, just days after his 19th birthday in 1990,
won the US Open. Now, the idea of a fresh-faced, relatively unknown kid winning a Grand Slam in
2016 is downright preposterous, while the idea that a 35-year old (say, Federer) could conceivably
snatch one up is anything but far-fetched.
In other words, it isn't a great time to be 18-year old Taylor Fritz (a Pete Sampras look-alike, and the
ITF world junior champion in 2015) -- or, for that matter, under-21 ATP tour players such as Nick
Kyrgios, Borna Coric, Hyeon Chung, Alexander Zverev, Kyle Edmund, Thanasi Kokkinakis -- and
others.
Right now, it looks as if making the top 20 is about the best even the most ambitious and talented
prodigy can shoot for -- at least until the next genius-grade player comes along to break the mold.
Greg Garber: Kyrgios is all of 20 years old. As a teenager, he beat Nadal at Wimbledon and reached
the quarterfinals. But that stunning between-the-legs drop shot underlines the dazzling talent -- and
the riddle that is the sometimes perplexing Australian. He beat Federer in Madrid and finished 36-30
overall in 2015.
Kyrgios also had the misfortune to meet Murray in three of the four Grand Slam events -- and lost
them all. He's currently sitting at No. 30 in the world. Let's see if he can reign in his emotions and
make the commitment to becoming a top-10 player.
Peter Bodo: Kyrgios is a good reminder, Greg, that this season will have no shortage of storylines -whether it's Serena's drive for the Grand Slam title record, Novak's quest for that elusive French
Open title, the rehabilitation of Kyrgios or the return of Vika and/or Rafa. But perhaps the most
intriguing for me in 2016 will be the ongoing saga of Bouchard, who's embroiled in that lawsuit with
the USTA stemming from the concussion she sustained in a fall during the US Open.
At the end of 2014, the year during which Bouchard played the Wimbledon final and two other
Grand Slam semis, she seemed the second coming of Chris Evert. Now -- who knows? There was the
horrific slump of 2015. The stirrings of resurgence at the US Open -- ruined by the locker room fall
and concussion. The still unresolved lawsuit. All that missed on-court time. What a story. And it's
about to come to life again. How about you, what player(s) are you thinking about?
Greg Garber: Under coach Lindsay Davenport -- a three-time Grand Slam champion in her own right
-- Madison Keys improved from No. 31 to a year-end No. 18. But Davenport, citing family obligations,
has stepped down, and Keys will now work with former ATP player Jesse Levine.

Of all the Americans, men or women, Keys at 20 seems to have the most upside; she could be a
future No. 1. Last year she made the semifinals in Melbourne, the quarters at Wimbledon and the
fourth round at the US Open. But will she continue to improve? I'll be watching that one closely in
2016.