You are on page 1of 28

1

DOCUMENT TYPE
SDA
MT 25 m

TBG

Rev.00
2015

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN REPORT
(ROOFTOP MINI TOWER 25 M)

FOR

SITE NAME : PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG
SITE ID

Status

: KRB 067

:

Accepted
Diterima
Rejected
Ditolak

On Hold
Ditunda
Technical Problems
Permasalahan Teknis

Comments:
Komentar

Approved by
Disetujui oleh

Signature/Date:
Tanda tangan

Signature/Date:
Tanda tangan

………………………

………………………

PT. REKAYASA
UTAMA

PT.TOWER BERSAMA
GROUP

1.

TEKNIK

Consultant Name
Nama Konsultan

: PT. Tower Bersama Group
: PT. Rekayasa Teknik Utama

DESIGN CRITERIA....................................................................................................................................... 3

PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG

Checked by :
Budimir Chaniago

Approved by PT. RTU :
Arif

DOCUMENT TYPE
SDA
MT 25 m

TBG

2.

2
Rev.00
2015

1.1

Standard Design.................................................................................................................................... 3

1.2

Software used for the analysis............................................................................................................... 3

1.3

Steel and bolts Material.......................................................................................................................... 3

1.4

Quality of other materials....................................................................................................................... 4

PARAMETER DESIGN ANALYSIS............................................................................................................... 4
2.1

Dead load............................................................................................................................................... 4

2.2

Loading of tower/pole............................................................................................................................. 4

3.

TOWER SUPPORT REACTIONS................................................................................................................. 4

4.

BASE FRAME ANALYSIS............................................................................................................................. 5

5.

6.

4.1

General.................................................................................................................................................. 5

4.2

Design Loads and Load Combinations.................................................................................................. 6

4.3

Modeling................................................................................................................................................ 6

4.4

Forces diagram...................................................................................................................................... 8

4.5

Displacement Base Frame..................................................................................................................... 8

4.6

Stress Ratio Base Frame..................................................................................................................... 10

4.7

Base Frame Support Reactions........................................................................................................... 11

4.8

Manual Checking of Sections Capacity & joint bolt..............................................................................11

BUILDING ANALYSIS STRUCTURE.......................................................................................................... 15
5.1

Sections Dimension:............................................................................................................................ 15

5.2

Loading of Structure:............................................................................................................................ 15

5.3

Load combination................................................................................................................................. 15

5.4

Modeling Building Structure................................................................................................................. 16

5.5

Frame Forces Output of Building......................................................................................................... 18

5.6

Sections Capacity................................................................................................................................ 19

5.7

Building analysis summary................................................................................................................... 22

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 23

PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG

Checked by :
Budimir Chaniago

Approved by PT. RTU :
Arif

The loading analyse for support reaction of tower applied is EIA Standard EIA-222-F 1. a) Structural Steel & Plate Structural steel & plate material shall be in accordance with ASTM A36 (fy = 245 N/mm 2) b) Structural Pipe Structural steel & plate material shall be in accordance with ASTM A53 (fy = 235 N/mm 2) c) Anchor Bolts Anchor material shall be in accordance with ASTM A307 (fy = 240 N/mm 2) d) Welding All of the process welding must use electrode D1.0 for steel base frame analysis PCACOL for column design and analysis 1.2 Loading Building : Peraturan Pembebanan Indonesia Untuk Gedung (PPUG 1983) Concrete Structure : Indonesian Standard SNI 2002 Steel Structure : Indonesian Standard SNI 2002 Software used for the analysis Pole structure : Ms.3 Steel and bolts Material Steel materials for the towers and appurtenances are confirmed to the relevant Indonesian standars and/or Japanese Industrial Standard.1 Standard Design Tower/pole structure : American Standard TIA/EIA-222-F 1. Used support reactions of tower 25 m TBG. The analyse of concrete beam only at rooftop and column applied to maximum forces at 3. RTU : Arif . “Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Tower and Antenna Supporting Structure. structure (under tower) with assumption of minimum reinforcement for calculate the section capacity. Tower V6 for tower analysis Building structure : SAP 200 V.12.00 2015 DESIGN CRITERIA 1. 1.1 E 60XX e) Galvanized Galvanising of all material shall be in accordance with ASTM A123 PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT. The analyse of building structure (rooftop) will be modeled and analysed by using the 3D 2. The selfsupporting tower has pole sections. frame linear elastic.DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 3 Rev.

275 -0. Plate fc’ = 42. Concrete Design compressive strength of concrete (fc’) refer to hammer test report.031 3.2 Loading of tower/pole Antenna Load using standard tower 25 m TOWER SUPPORT REACTIONS 3.016 -0.998 16.059 -5.024 Moment-Z kNm 0 -0.19 MPa b.019 0.454 -16.024 Moment-Y kNm 0.408 10.00 2015 Quality of other materials Design parameters of other materials 1. Column fc’ = 35.615 -16.83 16.96 MPa c..017 -0. Reinforcement Steel U – 39 fy = 390 N/mm2.003 0 1047 -3.011 0.216 -196.1 Dead load Dead load is dead weight of tower structure including all appurtenances and other items.4 DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 1. RTU : Arif .117 Moment-X kNm 0.199 3.4 Rev.791 -198.012 0.003 Maximum Tension Node PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT..018 -0.003 1003 1007 1027 Force-X kN -17.016 -0. Maximum Compress Node 1003 1007 1027 Force-X kN -18.012 0.019 -0.901 -5.182 Force-Z kN 223.08 MPa 2.639 5.632 14.018 0.216 Force-Y kN 18.333 Force-Z kN 221. Beam fc’ = 30. 2.011 0.791 13.797 5. a.017 -0. U – 24 fy = 240 N/mm2 2.023 Moment-Z kNm 0 -0.482 12.023 Moment-Y kNm 0. PARAMETER DESIGN ANALYSIS 2.331 Moment-X kNm 0.003 0 1047 -3.102 -0.376 Force-Y kN 18.

DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 4. RTU : Arif .1 General 5 Rev. BASE FRAME ANALYSIS 4. Model Tower Base Frame ( 3D ) Picture 2.00 2015 Baseframe analysed here in is a beam for roof top foundation structure and it supports for tower as shown on Figures below. Picture 1. Frame Section Tower Base Frame PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.

3 WL tension 2 8. 1.2 DL + 1.2 DL + 1.4 DL 2.3 WL compres 1 3. 1.DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 4.2 DL + 1. 1. 1.3 WL tension 3 9.2 DL + 1.00 2015 Design Loads and Load Combinations Design load to be considered are dead load and live load. There are four cases wind loading analysis for tower base frame.2 DL + 1. PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.3 WL compres 3 5.3 WL tension 1 7.2 DL + 1. 1.2 DL + 1.2 6 Rev. 1. 1.0 x self weight of base frame b) Wind load (WL) : maximum reaction from tower (4 case rotation) 2) Load combination 1.3 WL compres 2 4. RTU : Arif . 1. 1.2 DL + 1.3 WL compres 4 6.3 Modeling The Load Factor Resistance Design (LRFD) will be applied for the design of structure of baseframe. The whole structure will be modeled and analysed by using the 3D frame linear elastic element with the support of base frame on top of column.3 WL tension 4 4. Loading Combination to be considered for tower base frame are : 1) Design load a) Dead load (DL) : 1.

DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 7 Rev.00 2015 Picture 3. RTU : Arif . Wind Load base frame (max. compress tower reaction) (kN) PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.

DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 8 Rev. tension tower reaction) (kN) 4.4 Forces diagram Picture 6. Wind Load base frame (max. Axial & shear forces (kN) PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT. RTU : Arif .00 2015 Picture 4.

000389 0.000238 -0.00039 0.000095 -0.000096 0.000305 0.001503 -0.003116 0 0 -0.000238 -0.000324 0.003101 -0.001618 -0.00039 0.5 Displacement Base Frame TABLE: Joint Displacements Joi OutputC nt ase Tex t Text 15 COMB1 15 COMB2 15 COMB3 15 COMB4 15 COMB5 15 COMB6 15 COMB7 15 COMB8 15 COMB9 15 COMB10 16 COMB1 16 COMB2 16 COMB3 PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG CaseType U1 U2 U3 Text Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n m m m 0 0 -0.003218 -0.001515 -0.00 2015 Picture 7.000094 0.m) 4. Momen force (kN.000277 0 0 -0.000096 0.000098 -0.003206 -0.001603 -0.000389 0.000303 0.000098 -0.000095 -0.9 DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG Rev.000325 0. RTU : Arif .000094 0.000095 -0.003206 Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.000277 0 0 -0.000325 0.

00 2015 -0.000083 -0.000133 -0.001503 -0.000301 0.0000040 08 -0.001515 -0.004209 Approved by PT.00039 0.000328 -0.000302 0.000308 Checked by : Budimir Chaniago 0.000384 -0.0000011 61 -0. RTU : Arif .000128 0.001603 -0.000305 0.000044 0.000128 0.003218 -0.000098 -0.000389 0.001246 -0.000125 0.000386 -0.002834 -0.000306 -0.000323 0.00039 0.00022 0 0 0.000096 0.002915 -0.001183 -0.004122 0 0 -0.000324 0.000049 0.000022 -0.002918 -0.000303 0.00022 0 0 -0.000394 0.000107 -0.003101 -0.000094 0.000085 -0.000096 0.000321 0.003116 -0.001618 0 0 -0.000389 0.000394 0.000394 0.0000038 -0.000394 0.004206 -0.000085 -0.000098 -0.001264 -0.DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 16 COMB4 16 COMB5 16 COMB6 16 COMB7 16 COMB8 16 COMB9 16 COMB10 24 COMB1 24 COMB2 24 COMB3 24 COMB4 24 COMB5 24 COMB6 24 COMB7 24 COMB8 24 COMB9 24 COMB10 25 COMB1 25 COMB2 25 COMB3 25 COMB4 25 COMB5 25 25 COMB6 COMB7 PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n 10 Rev.000095 -0.000094 0.000189 -0.000083 -0.000189 -0.002837 -0.000132 -0.

000044 -0.000301 0.000302 0.004206 -0.002918 Approved by PT.001264 -0.001183 -0.000308 Checked by : Budimir Chaniago -0.0000014 07 -0.000107 -0.00 2015 2 Combinatio n 25 COMB8 25 COMB9 25 COMB10 26 COMB1 26 COMB2 26 COMB3 26 COMB4 26 COMB5 26 COMB6 26 COMB7 26 COMB8 26 COMB9 26 COMB10 27 COMB1 27 COMB2 27 COMB3 27 COMB4 27 COMB5 27 COMB6 27 COMB7 27 COMB8 Combinatio n Combinatio n 27 COMB9 Combinatio n PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n Combinatio n -0.000189 -0. RTU : Arif .000384 -0.000085 -0.000083 -0.000394 0.001161 -0.000083 -0.004125 0.000133 -0.000386 -0.000328 -0.001246 -0.000085 -0.0000014 07 -0.000306 -0.000394 0.000125 -0.000128 0.004125 -0.0000038 2 -0.00022 0 0 -0.000386 -0.DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 11 Rev.000044 0.004122 -0.002837 -0.000384 -0.000326 -0.002915 0 0 -0.000323 0.002834 -0.000045 0.000326 -0.000189 -0.000044 0 0 -0.0000011 61 -0.000048 0.0000040 08 -0.004209 0.000049 0.000394 0.000394 0.000384 -0.000132 -0.00022 0 0 0.000321 0.000045 -0.000128 0.000022 -0.

002918 m Allowable displacement = 4. The section ratio check for all members derived from SAP V14 by adjusting allowable stress based on LRFD 93 shown on the following figure.6 Stress Ratio Base Frame The member stress checking and connection design are presented on the following section. OK! Picture 7. Picture 8.000048 Rev. it can be concluded that section ratio check from manual calculation and soft ware output almost similar.017708 m > 0.25/240 = 0.000386 -0. RTU : Arif .TBG 27 12 DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m COMB10 Combinatio n -0.002918 m ….00 2015 -0.Summary Data AISC-LRFD99 Fra DesignT me DesignSect ype Status PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Ratio Checked by : Budimir Chaniago RatioTyp e Approved by PT.001161 Displacement max = 0. Steel interaction ratios TABLE: Steel Design 1 . Displacement (m) 4. By comparison with manual check as shown on the next calculation.

38 2 45.38 8 -6.7 Text Unitles s 0.263 1 M2 KN-m 10.5127 kN.m Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.286 16.4720 8 0. Mxmax PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG = 391.TBG Text Text H350x350x12 x19 H350x350x12 x19 H350x350x12 x19 H350x350x12 x19 IWF100x200x 6x8 4 5 6 7 8 4.69 43 M3 KN-m 195.3 16 V3 KN 26.8 13 DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m F1 F2 F3 KN KN KN 19.4253 13 0.628 214.0132 38 Text No Messages No Messages No Messages No Messages No Messages Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Rev.78 1 11.55 61 Steel Beam Section WF 350. RTU : Arif .350.00 2015 Text PMM Major Shear Major Shear PMM PMM Base Frame Support Reactions TABLE: Joint Reactions Joi OutputC CaseTyp nt ase e Tex t Text Text 7 COMB5 8 COMB5 13 COMB5 Combinati on Combinati on Combinati on COMB5 Combinati on 14 4.63 3 T KN-m 0.98 6 164.186 4.12.49 1 18.44 3 Manual Checking of Sections Capacity & joint bolt IWF 350X350X12X19 P KN 22.4256 86 0.19 1.68 8 9.442 22. Loading Data Maximal Moment.38 2 V2 KN 262.4720 8 0.655 -8.

RTU : Arif .081 kN Maximal Lateral. Zy = 2493182 1 /2 tf b2 + 1/4 (d .DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG Maximal Moment. Section Data Profil Used. Fu = 400 MPa Minimum Yield Point. Fp = 1200 MPa 3. tw = 12 Section are. d Widht flange.2tf) tw2 = Check compact section Flens : λ PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG 1174982 = 0 < λ < λp = b/2tf = mm3 mm3 9. WF Widht of beam.m 2. Section Capacity Moment Capacity Analysis фb Mn > Mu Where фb Mu = = 0. Vmax = 147. Mymax = 32.538 Maximal Shear.tf)2 Mn Modulus section.fr ) . Ag = 17390 14 Rev. b Height of beam.211 Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT. Zx = Modulus section. Nmax = 13. tf = = = = Widht web. Z = b tf (d . Fy = 245 MPa Tensile Strength. Fy = 634 MPa Tensile Strength.180 kN Minimum Yield Point.tf) + tw (d/2 .85 Momen ultimate = = Momen nominal fy. Fu = 827 MPa Bearing Stress.00 2015 kN. Material Data Steel Bolt 350x350x12x19 350 mm 350 mm 19 mm mm mm2 3. Z (compact section) = (fy .

871 kNm > kN Rev.205 kNm > 287.8 Ag) = 4174 kN Joint Connection Profile IWF 350x350x12x19 This connection planning is used the bolt connection. tf = 19 mm Thickness web. Fp = 1200 MPa = 245 MPa = 400 MPa Steel JISS-SS-400 Minimum Yield Point.6 fu Anv (asumtion Anv = 0.9 fy Ag 0.15 DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG λp = 170/√fy contition = = = 10. RTU : Arif . It is consist of tension slab at flange and slab connection at web where each of part is connected using bolt.55 kNm 61 10.8 Minimum Yield Point.75 fu Ae (asumtion Ae = 0.861 0 compact section фb Mn x = фb Mn y = < 9. b = 350 mm Height of beam.00 2015 < 10.382 kN OK > 22.6 fy Agv = ф b Vn = 2556 0.382 kN OK Tension Capacity Analysis фb Tn фb Tn = = = 0. Fy = 634 MPa Tensile Strength. tw = 12 mm Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.31 kN 6 OK OK Shear Capacity Analysis ф b Vn = 0. Fy Tensile Strength. Fu = 827 MPa Bearing Stress. Fu Data Planning : PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Widht of beam.861 195.8 Agv) = 3339 kN > 262.694 kNm 3 OK > 262. 1 Material HS Bolt A325/JIS B1180 Grade 8. d = 350 mm Thickness flange.31 kN 6 OK 3834 kN > 22.211 519.

for each top and bottom of flange Shear force (V) PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago (2 row at web) HS Bolt A325/JIS B1180 Grade 8. quality of steel is JISS SS 400 3 6. . Fu Bearing Stress.(φy*a*fy* b*(a/2)) 339.125 Mpa Mpa OK .for each face HS Bolt A325/JIS B1180 Grade 8.96 mm fuv fuv = = Vu/(n*Ab) 84.00 12.56 213. .5*m*fu bolt 310. Xn) . Fy Tensile Strength.547 kNm > 195.79 Mpa OK Approved by PT.00 2015 The support moment of connection Used for width slab is 200 mm.m kN 558.00 mm mm Use for diameter of bolt Minimum Yield Point.56 kNm Amount of bolt = 8 bolts Amount of bolts per one row Space between two bolts Space to the edge = = = 4 100 30 bolts mm mm Use for diameter of bolt m Ab = = = 16 1 200.794 Mpa fnv = fnv = φ *0. RTU : Arif .8 ∑ Fn a * Fy * b a a = = = = 0 ni * (nj * Ab * Fy bolt) (ni*(nj*Ab*Fy bolt))/(Fy*b) 10 mm φ Mn φ Mn φ Mn = = = φ (ni*Ab*Fy bolt)*(a + X1 + X2 + .8 mm2 > 84. Fp m = = = = = 20 634 827 1200 1 mm MPa MPa MPa Ab = 314 mm2 ni 2 nj 2 .73 kN Rev.52 mm = = 19.00 kN.13 310.547 kNm 339.TBG 2 16 DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m M max V max = = T = = M/d Thickness of Slab tf1 = = T/(width*σ) Use for thickness of one slab flens Use for thickness of one slab web 195.

3 Load combination 1.00 2015 Loading of Structure: Dead Load (DL): a) Plate : self weight b) Beam : self weight c) Column : self weight d) Floor : self weight Live Load (LL): a) 100 kg/m2 live load for Roof b) 250 kg/m2 live load for Floor Wind Load (WL) a. 1.2 Beam : 25x42 cm2 Column : 25x35 cm2 17 Rev.6 WL PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.4 DL 2. 1. RTU : Arif .2 DL +1. Support reaction of tower 5. BUILDING ANALYSIS STRUCTURE 5.DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 5.1 Sections Dimension: 5.2 DL + 1.6 LL 3. 1.0 LL + 1.

00 2015 Modeling Building Structure Picture 1. Structure 3D Modeling Picture 2. RTU : Arif . Building Frame & Area Section PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 5.4 18 Rev.

00 2015 Picture 3. Live & Dead Load (kg/m2) Picture 4.TBG DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m 19 Rev. RTU : Arif . Wind load (kN) PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.

RTU : Arif .193 7 M3 KN-m 33.00 2015 Picture 5. Moment diagram 5.052 26.369 M2 KN-m 0. Axial and shear diagram Picture 6.51 5 39.964 9 1.DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 20 Rev.222 7 -0.2109 42.522 6.9453 Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.66 2 V2 KN 38.41 1 PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG V3 KN T KN-m 1.5 Frame Forces Output of Building Maximum of beam forces 25x42 P KN 6.377 4.

fc' Concrete Density. Nmax = = = = 33.p Concrete cover.5005 4. fm Shear Reduction Factor.78 8 17. fv = = 0. nb2 = = = 13 3 0 mm (deform) Moment Reduction Factor.515 26. p.DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 21 Rev. L center to center of paralel beam. dba Total Bars Line I. b Height of beam. hf Length of beam.5 5 16. fys = = = 24000 390 240 N/m3 mPa mPa Widht of beam.3846 Concrete Beam Section 250/420 1. fys Bar U-24.8 0.6 Sections Capacity 5. Mmax (-) Maximal Shear. dbv Spaces between crossbars. h Height of plate.83 5 -0. Section Data Top Bars Bottom Bars Reduction Factor PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT. s Specific crossbar = = = = = = = = = 250 420 120 3000 3000 30 10 120 Single mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm Diameter of main bars. Material Data (225 kg/cm2) 3 (deformed bar) (plain bar) 3.00 2015 Maximum of column forces 25x35 P KN V2 KN V3 KN 615. na1 Total Bars Line II.945 38.662 kN.4. RTU : Arif . Bar U-39.m kN.826 4.m kN kN Concrete Pressure Strength.75 2.034 2. Loading Data Maximal Moment.1 Beam Section T KN-m -2.19 2400 mPa kg/m Minimum Yield. γb = = 30.211 42.k.06 2 205. dbb Total Bars Line I.6818 52.9 54 26. Mmax Maximal Moment. na2 = = = 13 3 0 mm (deform) Diameter of main bars. nb1 Total Bars Line II.694 3 34. cv Diameter of Crossbar.164 9 M2 KN-m M3 KN-m 35. Vmax Maximal Compress.

1968688 mm2 2 Total.226 mm mm Nmm kNm mm2 > (ρv = 42.069 d .25 * π * dbv^2 ) z Momen capacity.0006286 kN. Tsb = = = As * fy = 0. a = = = = = (As*fy)/(0. As' = = = = 0. Vs Shear Capacity of Beam. m OK ) kN kN kN > Checked by : Budimir Chaniago 38.297 2309519.85*f'c*bf) 8.143 = = = = = = 1/6 * (f'c)^0.901 = 2 * ( 0.7788 155. d' Area of Top Bars. Vr PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG (ρa = (ρb = (ρt= 0. Vc Support Capacity of Crossbar. Moment Capacity Calculation Constanta b1 Depth of Top Bars. Mr 5.465 ф Mn = = = ф(As*fy*z) 45901438.863 ( Av * fy * d ) / s 102.3937377 mm Width effective of flens.5 * b * d 74.5 46.(a/2) 369.945 0. Cc = = 155296. At = 796.85 * f'c * bf * hf Pressure Force of Concrete. Shear Capacity Calculation Area of Bar per-meter.1968688 mm mm mm2 Area of Bottom Bars.k.00 2015 4.7 2309. Av Shear Capacity of Concrete.0042645 ) 0.0075847 ) (1/4 * L) (b + (8 * hf)) (1/2 * p.97 45.5197 Conditions = (Tsb < Cc) Height of Pressure Concrete Block.0042645 ) 0. As = 398.p) N kN (assumed flens section full compress) N kN (Balok T Persegi) = 157. RTU : Arif .22 DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG Rev.771 133. bf (minimum of) = = = 750 1210 1500 mm mm mm Force of Bottom Steel.5 398.8484816 46. d'' Depth of Bottom Bars.515 kN OK Approved by PT.

RTU : Arif .4.DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 5.00 2015 Column Section Column (250x350) analysis used PCACOL program PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.2 23 Rev.

00 2015 Approved by PT. RTU : Arif .TBG PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m Checked by : Budimir Chaniago 24 Rev.

Jakarta. RTU : Arif .945 kN. Mult = 33. Concrete beam does not need strengthening.7 25 Rev. 2. Pmax = 1827 kN Axial Actual. Mult = 42. Vmax = 133. Type of concrete column 25x35 has more enough capacity to support the proposed loading.211 kN.m Moment Actual. Mmax Moment Actual. Pult < Maximal Moment.3846 kN.55 kN Axial Capacity.m Moment Capacity. Rekayasa Teknik Utama. (from PCACOL program) Axial Capacity.00 2015 Building analysis summary From analysis result above. Pult = 615.m < Moment Capacity. Pmax (Ok) (from PCACOL program) Moment Capacity.901 kN.DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 4. Vult = 38. Vmax Maximal Axial. Vult < Shear Capacity. Mult (-) < Moment Capacity. Mmax (-) Maximal Shear. Mei 2015 Approved : PT. Mmax (+) Maximal Moment. Mult (+) = 45. Concrete column does not need strengthening. Mmax = 59 kN.m Moment Capacity.515 kN Shear Capacity.m Moment Actual. Beam 25/42 Section Maximal Moment. Mmax (Ok) STRUCTURE ANALYSIS SUMMARY 1. Mmax = 45. Mult < (Ok) (Ok) (Ok) Column 25x35 Section 6. PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT. Type of concrete beam 25x42 has more enough capacity to support the proposed loading.901 kN.226 kN Shear Actual. Mult = 52.m Moment Capacity.

RTU : Arif .00 2015 Arif Noviardiansyah Design Consultant Appendix A SITE NAME : PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG SITE ID : KRB 067 Analysis Structure Print Out (Base frame & Building) PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG Dipargo Engineer 26 Rev.

RTU : Arif .DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 27 Rev.00 2015 Appendix B SITE NAME : PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG SITE ID : KRB 067 Structural Drawing PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.

00 2015 Appendix C SITE NAME : PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG SITE ID : KRB 067 Hammer Test PASAR KOTA KUALA SIMPANG Checked by : Budimir Chaniago Approved by PT.DOCUMENT TYPE SDA MT 25 m TBG 28 Rev. RTU : Arif .