Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brandon Soderquist
Scott Siegel
Section 1
December 6, 2014
Tanner Phillips
Brandon Soderquist
Scott Siegel
Section 1
December 6, 2014
Before experimentation began both the ice cubes and water needed to be
prepared. Because water does not hold solutes well at a cool temperature, 48 hours
prior to testing the water for the sugar ice cubs was heated and salt was added at a
proportion of 1 cup per liter, and all ice cubes were measure at 1 tablespoon and
frozen. 24 hours prior to test, both salt and sugar water were warmed and solutes
were added at a rate of 1 cup per liter. All water was left over night to cool to room
temperature.
Prior to the experiment we randomly assigned each of the tubs one of the
three water types using R in case of a systematic bias such as the temperature of
the room decreasing over the course of the experiment, or the ice cubes warming
from being removed from the freezer multiple times. For each tub we randomly
selected a treatment for each ice cube using R (Left=1, Center=2, Right=3).
This was to block for potential bias caused by one side of a tub having a
different effect. We took out the ice cubes being used and each of us placed
one ice cube on the left, center, or right of the tub, ice cubes were then returned
to the freezer. Using timers, we patiently watched the ice melt until there was
nothing to be seen. One experimenter was chosen as the recorder so that there
was a consistency in deciding when an ice cube was gone. We recorded the
time and waited for all of the ice in that tub to be melted. When the tub was
cleared we rinsed the tub and then filled it with the next solute as previously
determined. We ran two tubs at a time, and placed a light over them in order to
make the ice cubes easier to see. The experiment was repeated until all ice
cubes were gone.
Data Analysis
Source
DF
SS
Mean
Water
Tub
Ice Cube
Water*Ice
cube
Interaction
Residuals
26,575,74
3.36
2,092,900.
056
468,434.9
17
844,112.8
89
54,314.94
4
Total
36
18
330,088.8
33
30,365,59
5
Corrected
SS
26,575,74
3.36
1,046,450.
028
52,048.32
4
422,056.4
4
13,578.73
6
18,338.26
9
F Value
P-Value
20.11
0.0005
2.84
0.0285
23.02
<0.0001
0.74
0.5767
Tanner Phillips
Brandon Soderquist
Scott Siegel
Section 1
December 6, 2014
Tanner Phillips
Brandon Soderquist
Scott Siegel
Section 1
December 6, 2014
Plot
Water
Spot
Ice cube
Time in
Seconds
normal
sugar
387
normal
vinigar
485
normal
water
685
sugar
sugar
730
sugar
vinigar
630
sugar
water
normal
vinigar
595
normal
sugar
325
normal
water
774
sugar
sugar
795
sugar
vinigar
1095
sugar
water
1235
salt
water
675
salt
sugar
850
salt
vinigar
790
salt
water
salt
vinigar
1245
1470
985
Tanner Phillips
Brandon Soderquist
Scott Siegel
Section 1
salt
sugar
salt
vinigar
salt
water
salt
sugar
water
water
water
sugar
sugar
sugar
December 6, 2014
1085
10
water
vinigar
430
960
10
water
water
625
1290
10
water
sugar
410
655
11
sugar
water
1345
vinigar
390
11
sugar
sugar
sugar
405
11
sugar
vinigar
1130
water
725
12
salt
sugar
1030
water
1470
12
salt
vinigar
sugar
960
12
salt
water
vinigar
1175
865
940
1290