You are on page 1of 4

Category

1

2

3

4

Layout/Design

The pages are
unattractive. Text is
difficult to read. The
backgrounds are
distracting.

The pages appear
“busy” or “boring”. Text
may be difficult to read.
The backgrounds are
somewhat distracting.

The pages are eyecatching and attractive.
Text is easy to read. The
backgrounds are subtle
and appropriate.

The pages are well
organized with tables.
Text spacing and
alignment make reading
easy. The backgrounds
enhance the page.

Graphics

There are no photos,
icons or clip art or they
are inappropriate or of
low quality.

Photos are blurry or
fuzzy; icons and clip art
do not “fit” with the
topic. Too many pictures
make the download time
slow.

Photos, icons, and clip
art are appropriate, of
high quality, and
download fairly quickly.

Photos, icons, and clip art
are used creatively and
may follow a theme.

Information

Information is poorly
written, inaccurate, or
incomplete.

Information could be
better written and too
much information is
given in each section.

Information is well
Information is creatively
written and interesting to written and cleverly
read and is presented in presented.
short sections.

Navigation/Links

The user may become
lost or links may be
missing or not working.

The user may become
confused when
navigating between
pages. Some links may
not work.

Links are consistent and
easy to find so that the
user can easily navigate
back and forth through
pages.

Links are created with
images and icons to
enhance the text links.

Creativity

Minimal effort. Poor
layout/design. Did not
incorporate required
attributes, graphics, did
not resize pictures,
inappropriate graphics.

Was clever at times;
incorporated most of the
attributes; used a
limited variety of
appropriate graphics.

Was well done and
interesting to the
audience; added a few
original touches to
enhance the project;
used a good variety of
appropriate graphics.

Was extremely clever and
presented with originality.
Excellent layout/design
work incorporating all
required attributes, great
variety of appropriate
graphics that enhanced
the pages.

Very Satisfactory (3) The overall objectives of the student projects have been clearly stated however the students did not include quantifiable targets and anticipated outcomes. The students have presented some reasons why their project is needed yet they were not able to convince the panels of its potential impact. The students have justified and convinced the panel why their project is needed however the potential impact of the project is not enough to account for the time and effort of the student and from the panels. The students have explained that their project has the potential to make a significant impact however they were not able to indicate a target group which will benefit from the project. Lacking (1) The objective of the project is only for the sake of submission. . Impact or Benefits The students have explained that their project has the potential to make a significant impact and indicated target group which will benefit from the project. There is no justification of the impact of the submitted project.Characteristics Excellent (4) Goals and Objectives The overall objectives of the student projects have been clearly stated and the students include quantifiable targets and anticipated outcomes. Satisfactory (2) An objective about the project has been presented but is not clearly coherent to the desired output. The students have presented that their project has the potential impact but were not able to convince the panels of its justification. There is no impact or benefit that can be gain from the submitted project. Justification/Technica The students have l justified and Merit convinced the panel why their project is needed and the potential impact of the project is large enough to account for the time and effort of the student and from the panels.

The student just merely agrees with the presented idea about the application by his/her group mate.Presentation The students have presented their project in a clear way and the presentation is understandable to a non-expert audience. The students have presented their project with minor help form the instructor on clarifying some terms that are used in the presentation. Cooperation Always present during group meetings and actual development task. The students were able to answer most of the questions with clear justifications. Seldom present on actual development task and actual development task. The students have presented their project by merely reading the material that they have prepared. Characteristics Excellent (4) Very Satisfactory (3) Satisfactory (2) Lacking (1) Collaboration of Idea The student conceptualize the entire idea of the application The student contributes to some of the idea about the application. . Always present on actual development task and attends most of the time during group meetings. The students were able to answer all the questions from the panels with strong justification. Student did not contribute anything to the idea of the presented application. Harmoniously worked with others Accomplished the assigned task all the time Accomplished assigned task most of the time Seldom accomplished assigned task Did no accomplished the assigned task Proficiency The students contributed minimal answers without any justifications. The students have presented their project in a clear way however the presentation is very technical and requires expertise or knowledge of the presented topic. Always unavailable on group meetings and actual development task. The students were able to answer some of the questions with ambiguous justifications.

Participation towards the completeness of the project Student completely contributed towards the accomplishment of the project Student contributed most towards the accomplishment of the project Student shared minimal insight Student did not share any insight towards the completeness of the project .