You are on page 1of 4

IJSTE - International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering | Volume 2 | Issue 07 | January 2016

ISSN (online): 2349-784X

Comparative Study on Strengthening of RC Beam
in Flexure using CFRP & GFRP: A Review
By Anurag K. Jain
M. Tech. Student
Department of Civil Engineering
GHRCE Nagpur

D. S. Padole
Assistant Professor
Department of Civil Engineering
GHRCE Nagpur

Abstract
The paper and its study deals with the comparison in flexural strength of RC beams laminated with Carbon fibre reinforced
polymer (CFRP) and/or Glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP). The main aim of this study to provide alternatives for CFRP as
it is very costly material and made from non-renewable sources which are available in very few quantity. Various existing
structures need changes in it due either end of its load bearing capacity or effects of corrosive chemicals, seepage, and other
various defects in structure. Seismic retrofitting of constructions vulnerable to earthquakes is a current problem of great political
and social relevance. The study is based on the behaviour and comparison of RC structures which were laminated and
strengthened with CFRP and GFRP.
Keywords: Flexural Strength, CFRP, GFRP, Comparison, Seismic Retrofitting
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I. INTRODUCTION
Civil Engineering structures are an important part of infrastructures and provide good service to the user; they experience
distresses on account of reason and need of strengthening and retrofitting to bring them back to their originally intended service
condition. A large numbers of structures constructed in the olden days using old design codes in different parts of world are
structurally unsafe compared to today’s codes. As replacement of total structure or part of the structure is uneconomical, time
consuming therefore strengthening has become possible way of improving the load carrying capacity and extending life of
structure. If the effective method is used for strengthening and retrofitting it is possible to bring structures back to their originally
intended service usage, many modern techniques are involved to proper effective strengthening and retrofitting methods. [2]
Strengthening of RC beams is necessary to obtain the expected lifespan of structures. Life span of RC beam may reduce
because of improper beam design, ingression of chemical agents etc. Strengthening of RC beams using steel plates and FRP
composites are most common globally. In order to minimize the disadvantages of steel such as corrosion, high unit weight,
connection difficulties; many researchers have tried various FRP composites such as Aramid, Glass and Carbon. In future, Fibre
Reinforced Polymer (FRP) materials could play an important role for the construction industry. Nowadays, retrofitting work for
RC structural members, GFRP composites are commonly used because of its excellent properties such as high strength, less
weight to strength ratio, non-corrosive nature and easy handling. [1]
Commercial material commonly has glass or carbon fibres in matrices based on thermosetting polymers, such as epoxy or
polyester resins. Sometimes, thermoplastic polymers may be preferred, since they are mouldable after initial production.
Externally bonding fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) sheets with an epoxy resin is an effective technique for strengthening and
repairing the reinforced concrete (RC) beams under flexural loads.
Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP), also Fibre-reinforced plastic, is a composite material made of a polymer matrix reinforced
with fibres. The fibres are usually glass, carbon, or aramid, although other fibres such as paper or wood or asbestos have been
sometimes used. The polymer is usually an epoxy, vinylester or polyester thermosetting plastic, and phenol formaldehyde resins
are still in use. FRPs are commonly used in the aerospace, automotive, marine, and construction industries, chemical processing
equipment and civil infrastructure such as bridges and buildings.
Fiberglass refers to a group of products made from individual glass fibers combined into a variety of forms. Glass fibers can
be divided into two major groups according to their geometry: continuous fibers used in yarns and textiles, and the discontinuous
(short) fibers used as batts, blankets, or boards for insulation and filtration. Fiberglass textiles are commonly used as a
reinforcement material for moulded and laminated plastics.
In addition carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer or carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP or CRP or often simply carbon fiber), is
a very strong and light fiber-reinforced polymer which contains carbon fibers. Carbon fibres are created when polyacrylonitrile
fibres (PAN), Pitch resins, or Rayon are carbonized (through oxidation and thermal pyrolysis) at high temperatures. Carbon
fibres are manufactured in diameters analogous to glass fibres with diameters ranging from 9 to 17 μm. [3]

All rights reserved by www.ijste.org

129

and in general engineering and transportation. Newer applications are also being developed for protective clothing (used in various chemical industries for work in extremely hostile environments). However. however these loads are very frequent in bridges and cause combine twisting. and shear under eccentric load on beam has hardly been cited experimentally in literature. 1: Comparison between experimental and predicted total applied load. and shearing forces within the beam. which includes engineering components such as bearings. general aviation interiors. Similarly. Carbon fibers are very brittle. fan blades and automobile bodies. general entertainment and musical instruments and after-market transportation products. Conductivity in electronics technology provides additional new application. which includes aerospace and nuclear engineering. The layers in the fibers are formed by strong covalent bonds. PROPERTIES In general. Fig. RESEARCH SIGNIFICANCE Structural engineers typically design RC beam loaded in such a way that torsion is not a major concern and therefore. marine. With PAN based carbon fibers. STUDY OBJECTIVE The objectives of proposed study are as follows: 1) For comparative study of strengthening of RC beam using CFRP and GFRP. [4] V. the strength of a carbon fiber depends on the type of precursor. Tensile strength and modulus are significantly improved by carbonization under strain when moderate stabilization is used. the fiber fails at very low strain. the crystallites are arranged around the longitudinal axis of the fiber with layer planes highly oriented parallel to the axis. shear and torsion individually. Torsional effects are rarely occur alone. Eccentric loads are typically avoided in designing of beam. On bending. 3) To investigate the combine effects of flexural strength of RC beams by using CFRP and GFRP. therefore achievements are not significant as seem in area of bending. The modulus has been shown to increase with increasing temperature. [3] III. These carbon adsorbents can be converted into a wide variety of textile forms and nonwoven materials. effect of torsion is usually neglected in structural analysis. The sheet-like aggregations allow easy crack propagation. similar high modulus type pitch-based fibers deform by a shear mechanism with kink bands formed at 45° to the fiber axis. These torsional moments may increase stresses on the member and can change the response of entire structure. the processing conditions. Cheaper and newer versions of carbon fibers are being produced from new raw materials. the strength increases up to a maximum of 1300 ºC and then gradually decreases. gears. it is seen that the higher the tensile strength of the precursor the higher is the tenacity of the carbon fiber. PAN based fibers typically buckle on compression and form kink bands at the innermost surface of the fiber.org 130 . electromagnetic shielding and various other novel applications. Overall. flexural and shear strengthening options are required to propose. The combined effect of torsion. flexure. strengthening options are individually available for flexural shear and torsion however combine effect of torsion. Others include: decoration in automotive.Comparative Study on Strengthening of RC Beam in Flexure using CFRP & GFRP: A Review (IJSTE/ Volume 2 / Issue 07 / 030) II. The use of carbon fibers in Nonwovens is in a new possible application for high temperature fireretardant insulation. X-ray and electron diffraction studies have shown that in high modulus type fibers. cams. 2) To increase the experimental test data for strengthening of RC beam using externally bonded composites. [7] All rights reserved by www. [3] IV. heat treatment temperature and the presence of flaws and defects. 4) To design the most effective repair system using GFRP laminates to strengthen the damaged RC beams combine effects of flexure. APPLICATION The two main applications of carbon fibers are in specialized technology.ijste. Recently. some new applications of carbon fibers have been found. bending.

stiffness. and strengthening cost of H-CF/GF-RP strengthening beams were 89. Flexural performance of beams were checked and results had shown significant increase of ductility and a remarkable decrease of strengthening cost with slight varieties in load carrying capacity and stiffness of strengthened beams. They also conclude that the load carrying capacity of the Flexure strengthening beam predicted by the finite element analysis is higher than that of the control beam.Comparative Study on Strengthening of RC Beam in Flexure using CFRP & GFRP: A Review (IJSTE/ Volume 2 / Issue 07 / 030) Fig. [7-10] VI. Author also came to the conclsion that comparative result gives 20% difference for experimental and ANSYS 12. They compared both the computer modelling and experimental data and found that computer based modelling is can be an excellent alternative of destructive laboratory test with an acceptable variation of results.0 [2] Review Paper 6: Two types of strengthening system named namely hybrid carbon fiber/glass fiber-reinforced polymer (H CF/GF-RP) strengthening and CFRP strengthening and six bems were used to carry out compressive test. They found that the smaller the span/depth ratio.org 131 . LITERATURE REVIEW Some of the research work carried out on comparative study between experimental and analytical work in FRP strengthening describe below. Under similar failure loads the deflection ductility. [5] Review Paper 2: Saifullah performed destructive test on simply supported beam in laboratory and load-deflection data of that under RC beam. [11] All rights reserved by www. 10 and 38% lower than those of the CFRP. 2: Comparisons between experimental and predicted moment and load. As the depth of the beam increases in the variation in strength.ijste. the more pronounced was the deviation of strain pattern at mid-section of the beam. [7] Review Paper 4: Patil described analysis of two beams subjected to two point loading with different span to depth ratios using nonlinear FEM.7% higher. Review Paper 3: Jayajothi carried out the nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete (RC) beams strengthened in flexure and shear by Fibre Reinforced Polymer (FRP) laminates and they found that the ultimate load carrying capacity of all the strengthened beams is higher when compared to the control beams and general behaviors of the FE models show good agreement with observations and data from the experimental tests. [6] Review Paper 5: Uma performed the flexural response of Reinforced Geoploymer Concrete (RGPC) beam. Review Paper 1: Amer Ibrahim performed Numerical analysis on RC beams by ANSYS finite element program and results show that the general behaviour of the finite element models represented by the load-deflection curves at mid span show good agreement with the test data. flexural steel and deflection were found to be more experimentally than the nonlinear FEM analysis. Results were compred on both ANSYS modelling and experiment data found that the deflection obtained was low due to the meshing of element in the modelling.

Shaishav R. Maghsoudi. Grace. Awati.A. After cracking. 3) Reduction in stiffness of strengthened beams after yielding the tensile steel was observed by increasing the number of CFRP layers. Mohite. Xiong. J. 2004.8 kN was applied. Amiya K.ijetae. Volume 4. Six were non-strengthened and eight were strengthened. [13] VII. Vora. REFERENCE [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] N. Aravind. Fourteen beams were tested under cycling load at different load ranges. 96. Mahmood. CONCLUSION 1) There is a need to switch over from the utilization of artificial fibres. each beam was strengthened with a FRP material. J. “A Review of RC Beams Strengthened for Flexure. Five FRP strengthening systems were used in this research project. The only noticeable difference between them is that shear cracks were also noticed in all the strengthened beams.net/publication/275652863. and Garrity SW. M.” J. Constr. Compos. Yang. 2015.09. Christos G. N. Martin Alberto Masuelli.Comparative Study on Strengthening of RC Beam in Flexure using CFRP & GFRP: A Review (IJSTE/ Volume 2 / Issue 07 / 030) Review Paper 7: Author carried out experimental work which consisted of testing 14 simply supported beams. Michael F. and Tarak P. 5. Properties and Processes.doi.” IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. S. August 2014. Grace NF.org/10. “Fatigue Behavior of RC Beams Strengthened with GFRP Sheets. and Garrity SW. I. Ashour AF. R. 5) Increasing the number of CFRP layers reduced loss in stiffness of strengthened beams after yielding the tensile steel.” European Journal of Scientific Research ISSN 1450-216X Vol.526-541 © Euro Journals Publishing. Ji. Petrou. “Flexural strengthening of Reinforced Concrete (RC) Beams Retrofitted with Corrugated Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Laminates. Dilip Kr. 2:244–253. Beams with Side Bonded GFRP Laminates. J2004.1016/j. “Comparative study of experimental and analytical results of FRP strengthened beams in flexure.5772/54629. 101(2):237–44. A. N. Akbarzadeh. and Mohammed Sh. and R. El-Refaie SA. “Strengthening of cantilever and continuous beams using new triaxially braided ductile fabric.” http://dx. Issue 8. Dr M. No. and Joseph V. The stiffness of the beam strengthened with GFRP is less than the beams strengthened with CFRP after yielding the tensile steel. Sayed.” Cem Concr Compos 2004. Ibrahim. All rights reserved by www.” www. in addition to the longitudinal layers. G. H. and T. 2) Carbon fibre is available in very small quantity and too much costly and GFRP is available in low cost and has shown good characteristics strength so could be good alternative for CFRP. S.” Curved and Layer. Thanikal. Samanta. “Introduction of Fibre-Reinforced Polymers – Polymers and Composites: Concepts.041. and Kent A. Imran. Compos. and K. doi:10. Struct. “Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with Externally Bonded Hybrid Carbon Fiber–Glass Fiber Sheets. Constr. yielding of the steel reinforcement due to fatigue. September-October 1999. Ragheb WF. The stiffness of the beam strengthened with GFRP is less than the beams strengthened with CFRP after yielding the tensile steel. El-Refaie SA. 5(4): 246-253. usually very close to failure. “Finite Element Modelling of Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with FRP Laminates.” J. Abdel-Sayed G. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd.4 (2009). and CFRP plates (System V). Shafiq.8:275-278. Viradiya. Amer M. K. Experiments were conducted on beams with and without GFRP composite sheets on their tensile surfaces. “Flexural Behaviour of R.2009. Soliman. V.” ACI Structural Journal.2009. M. pp. B. to environmental beneficial materials like glass fibres. Shear and Torsion loading” http://www. It was concluded that.com. 555-561. “Sagging and hogging strengthening of continuous reinforced concrete beams using carbon fiber-reinforced polymer sheets. ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal. Beams had the same dimensions and flexural and shear reinforcements.researchgate.30 No. two types of GFRP sheets (Systems III and IV). and Z. “Experimental and analytical investigation of reinforced high strength concrete continuous beams strengthened with fiber reinforced polymer.ijste. ISSN 22502459. F. Saleh. and A.” ACI Struct J 2003. Akbar. 26:765– 75. Ayub. 100(4):446–53..” Materials and Design 31 (2010) 1130–1147. Ashour AF. The stiffness of the beam strengthened with GFRP is less than the beams strengthened with CFRP after yielding the tensile steel. Papakonstantinou. Both strengthened and non-strengthened beams exhibited the same primary mode of failure.C. Z. A. “Strengthening Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Laminates.org 132 .matdes. These systems consisted of two types of CFRP sheets (Systems I and II). Volume: 03 Issue: 04 Apr-2014. Harries.” ACI Struct. Singha Roy.Inc. Patil. 2001. Mid-span load of 44. G. the fibers oriented in the vertical direction forming a U-shape around the beam cross section significantly reduce beam deflections and increase beam load carrying capacity. “Flexural strengthening of RC continuous beams using CFRP laminates. [12] Review Paper 8: The main objective of the presented article on this paper was to examine the effects of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite rehabilitation systems on the fatigue performance of reinforced concrete beams. 4) Increasing the number of CFRP layers reduced loss in stiffness of strengthened beams after yielding the tensile steel. which are non-renewable and fossil fuel products. A.