You are on page 1of 3

THE CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW 2016 PRESIDENTIAL

CAMPAIGN
CODY ROBERT JUDY U.S. PRESIDENT 2016
February 16th, 2016
Cody Robert Judy
30131 Ogden Avenue,
Suite 2,
Ogden, UT 84403
801-497-6655
-

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


OFFICE OF THE CLERK
1ST Street N.E.
WASHINGTON DC 20543-0001
RE: Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro
Dear Mr. Scott S. Harris Clerk by and through Ms. Michelle Marshall (202)
479-3038:
Your letter dated February 11, 2016 is the subject of a Criminal
Complaint to the U.S. Attorney Generals Office under 18 U.S.C. 1001 (a), which
states:
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter
within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or [judicial branch] of
Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully
(1)Falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or
device [,]a material fact;
(2)Makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent
statement or representation;
(3)Makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the
same to contain any materially false fictitious, or
fraudulent statement or entry
shall be fined under this title imprisoned not more than 5 years or
Even constitutionally explicit Fifth Amendment rights do not exonerate
affirmative false statements. As the Court in Brogan v. United States
COUNT 1.

The February 11, 2016 Letter is an entry in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 not made
available for the Public on the Docket Report and representing false, fictitious, or
fraudulent statement or representation especially in the considerations of the case
stating:
The petition for a writ of certiorari was denied October 5 th, 2015,
The Docket report made available to the Public and also represented on the SCOTUS
RECORD states: http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?
filename=/docketfiles/14-9396.htm

Oct Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma


5
pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
201
5
The difference between a Motion for Forma Pauperis and a Writ of Certiorari is
an application easily differentiated by even freshman paralegals and there is
no excuse for a misrepresentation in the U.S. Supreme Court on such a simple
differentiation.
The motive clearly to [obfuscate Justice] in the considerations of the
[mistake] made by the Court, and a refusal to file on the Docket Report of 149396 the [Motion to Reopen and Reconsider the Motion for Forma Pauperis]
with new evidence submitted for the Court, there is a clear breach of the
citation of law made in the February 11, 2016 Letter to the Petitioner, with the
false representation of the Court Clerk in the confirming and adjudicated
statement:
and the time for filing a petition for rehearing has expired. This case is
considered closed in this Court, and no further consideration by this Court is
possible. See Rule 44 of the rules of this Court. The application allowing the
procedure of a Motion to ReOpen and Reconsider the forma pauperis being
[unless the Court or a Justice shortens or extends the time.]

COUNT II
Having failed to file the MOTION TO REOPEN AND RECONSIDER THE FORMA
PAUPERIS, with new evidence is a blatant and arbitrary action of malfeasance
by a public official as the Court Clerk is considered to the Justices of the U.S.
Supreme Court.
In effect, the Court Clerk as superseded the Justice of the Court by
1- Failing to Report to the Court Justices and Public, accountable by the
Docket Report, the new evidence for the Justices to consider.
2- Superseding the very application of Justice the Court is responsible to
the public for.
3- Purposefully and arbitrarily conducting a [war on the poor] in
2

preventing [access to justice] by misbehavior, and bad behavior.


4- Has caused an ill affect with damages to the Petitioner both in a false
and unnecessary delay of timing and adjudication of Justice in the Case
14-9396, monetary damages in time, mailing, research, and legal work
with an absence of courtesy and in the spirit of discrimination and
meanness towards Justice and access to the Court wholly contemptible.
The MOTION IS HEREWITH resubmitted unchanged for Docketing AND this
Criminal Complaint filed to the United States Justice Department Loretta
Lynch.
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy / Petitioner /s/___________________________