This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: email@example.com Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
Digitally signed by Joseph H Zernik DN: cn=Joseph H Zernik, o, ou, firstname.lastname@example.org, c=US Location: La Verne, California Date: 2010.04.19 01:08:03 -07'00'
10-04-18 Human Rights Alert - Appendix to UPR Report
The appendix includes a series of records in support of the allegations, conclusions, and recommendations in the report. Links are provided to the online, digitally verified copies of records at the Human Rights Alert Scribd account. 1) April 18, 2010 Human Rights Alert – Final Submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/10-04-18-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Submission-to-theUnited-Nations-for-the-2010-Universal-Periodic-Review-of-the-US-s
2) The case of the Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) A list of reports and studies by other organizations who document the scope and nature of the case, which is claimed to be a Human Rights violation of historic proportions. The best estimate for the number of those falsely imprisoned for over a decade is from the acclaimed series by Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) LAPD Blues, and the estimates were at minimum 8,000, and possibly 16,000 or more. a) Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) – a Review – by Dr Joseph Zernik for Human Rights Alert. http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729660/09-12-17-Rampart-FIPs-Falsely-Imprisoned-Persons-Review b) 2001 Rampart False Imprisonments – by PBS Frontline Series: LAPD Blues http://www.scribd.com/doc/24901612/01-05-01-Rampart-FIPs-Rampart-First-Trial-PBS-FrontlineRampart-False-Imprisonments-s c)_ 2006 Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/06-07-15-LAPD-s-Blue-Ribbon-Review-Panel-Report-2006 d) 2001 The Justice System of Los Angeles County – by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/00-09-01-The-criminal-justice-system-of-Los-AngelesCounty-California-by-E-Chemerinsky-57-Guild-Prac-121-2000 e) 2001 Policing the Justice System – by Prof David Burcham and Prof Katherine Fisk http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/00-00-00-David-Burcham-and-Katherine-Fisk-LoyolaSymposium-The-Rampart-Scandal-Policing-the-Criminal-Justice-System-2000-s 3) Case of Richard Fine a) Richard Fine – a Review - by Dr Joseph Zernik for Human Rights Alert http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729084/09-12-17-Richard-Isaac-Fine-Review-e b) Motion for Intervention in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827), at the US Supreme Court, for a conference scheduled for April 23, 2010 – by Dr Joseph Zernik At the time of writing this appendix, such papers were served on parties, but it is not known if the court would accept the filing of such papers in a timely manner. The motion and its Appendices document the various fraudulent schemes employed against the 70 year old Richard Fine, who is held in solitary confinement for over a year, with no warrant, and no judgment, conviction, or sentencing ever entered in his case.
April 19, 2010
A series of letters by Frederick Bennett, Court Counsel, Los Angeles Superior Court, in response to letters addressed to the Clerk of the Court and Presiding Judge. Such letters document that the Los Angeles Superior Court never operated for over a quarter century with honest, published Local Rules of Court, instead, the court counsel made conflicting statements in various letters regarding the Rules of Court. Most significant was the effective admission of the Court Counsel, that for over a quarter century the Los Angeles Superior Court published false and deliberately misleading Local Rules of Court relative to true nature of Books of Judgments and Entry of Judgment in the Court. It is claimed that the ambiguity created in entry of judgment at the Los Angeles Superior Court was key in the racketeering activity of judges of the court. Following the Court Counsel’s claim that the Microfilm Judgments archive was today the court’s effective Book of Judgments, a search was conducted that showed that no judgment for contempt were ever entered in the case that was purported to be the basis for Richard Fine arrest- Marina Strand Colony II Homeowners Assn. vs County of L.A. Marina v LA County (BS109420). Likewise, evidence is presented that no judgments were entered in other cases of significance: i. Sturgeon v Los Angeles County (BC351286) – a case that was purported to review the legal foundation for the taking by ALL judges of secret payments from Los Angeles County for over a decade. ii. Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) – a case that is alleged as the prototype of real estate fraud by judges and attorneys under the guise of litigation at the court. iii. Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) – a case that was opined as real estate fraud under the guise of real estate litigation, and followed the prototype of Galdjie v Darwish. a) April 18, 2010 Amended Motion to Intervene http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-1-Amended-Motion-toIntervene-s b) April 18, 2010 Amended Request for Lenience for Pro Se Filer http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-2-Amended-Request-forLenience-by-Pro-Se-Filer-s c) April 18, 2010 Amended Request for Incorporation by Reference http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-3-Amended-Request-forCorrections-in-US-Supreme-Court-Records-s d) April 18, 2010 Amended Request for Corrections in US Supreme Court Records http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-4-Amended-Request-forIncorporation-by-Reference-s e) April 18, 2010 Amended Appendix for Motion to Intervene http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161692/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-5-Amended-Appendices-s 4) Case of Dr Joseph Zernik The Addendum to Complaint to the Inspector General of the US Department of Justice documented the disregard of senior US Officers to the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of the 10 million residents of Los Angeles County, California. The Inspector General, Glenn A Fine, so far refused to respond on the complaint. An inquiry in this regard was issued by the Hon Dianne Feinstein, Senator from California. Likewise, the complaint filed with Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) reflects refusal of senior US Officers to provide equal protection. The OCC so far refuses to answer on the complaint, and inquiry in this regard was issued by the Hon Dianne Feinstein, Senator from California. The records linked below provide evidence for involvement of the most senior US officers and US corporate management in conduct that was in disrespect of the Human, Constitutional, and Civil rights of US citizens, and demonstrated the ongoing refusal to enforce the law in Los Angeles County, California. c) January 19, 2010 Addendum to Complaint filed on November 23, 2009, and again on December 2, 2009 with Inspector General of US Department of Justice against Kenneth Kaiser – Assistant Director of FBI for Criminal Investigations, and Kenneth Melson – then Director of US Dept of Justice, Office of US Attorneys
April 19, 2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25445659/10-01-19-Addendum-to-Complaint-to-Inspector-General-USDept-of-Justice-re-refusal-to-protect-Los-Angeles-County-residents-against-racketeering-judg b) March 9, 2010 Addendum to Complaint filed on November 23, 2009, and again on December 2, 2009 with Inspector General of US Department of Justice against Kenneth Kaiser – Assistant Director of FBI for Criminal Investigations, and Kenneth Melson – then Director of US Dept of Justice, Office of US Attorneys http://www.scribd.com/doc/28125499/10-03-09-Addendum-to-Complaint-to-DOJ-IG-RegardingFraud-by-Kenneth-Kaiser-Assistant-Director-of-FBI-for-Criminal-Investigations c) March 6, 2010 Addendum to Complaint filed with OCC against Bank of America Corporation http://www.scribd.com/doc/29653627/10-03-06-Bank-of-America-Addendum-to-Appeal-1070442filed-with-Office-of-Comptroller-of-the-Currency-against-Brian-Moynihan d) February 26, 2010 Letter from the Office of the Hon Dianne Feinstein Re: Inquiry on US Dept of Justice Inspector General http://www.scribd.com/doc/29659469/10-02-26-Senator-Feinstein-s-Inquiry-on-US-Department-ofJustice-Inspector-General-Glenn-A-Fine-s e) March 11, 2010 Follow up letter from the Office of the Hon Dianne Feinstein Re: Inquiry on US OCC http://www.scribd.com/doc/29647939/10-03-11-Bank-of-America-Senator-Dianne-Feinstein-FollowUp-with-US-Office-of-Comptroller-of-the-Currency-Re-Bank-of-America-Corporation-s 5) Case management system (CMS) of the sheriff’s Department, Los Angeles County, California Large scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, California are alleged through holding of inmates based on false records, routinely posted by the Sheriff’s Department in its online public access system “Inmate Information Center”, while denying access to the true arrest and booking records, which are public records by California Public Records Act – GOVT. CODE §§ 6250 - 6276.48 a) Data Survey http://www.scribd.com/doc/24809956/10-01-04-Los-Angeles-Sheriff-Department-Inmateinformation-Center-data-survey-Jose-Martinez-s b) Data Survey http://www.scribd.com/doc/25064776/10-01-11-Sheriff-s-Department-of-Los-Angeles-CountyInmate-Information-Center-data-survey-Jose-Rodriguez-s c) Data Survey http://www.scribd.com/doc/24816245/10-01-05-Sheriff-s-Department-of-Los-Angeles-CountyInmate-Information-Center-data-survey-John-Smith-s d) Data Survey http://www.scribd.com/doc/28350775/10-03-14-Survey-of-Los-Angeles-County-Sheriff-sDepartment-Inmate-Information-Consecutive-Numbers-s e) Data Survey http://www.scribd.com/doc/25315610/10-01-16-Los-Angeles-County-Sheriff-s-Departmentinmate-data-survey-VINE-vs-Inmate-Information-Center-re-Jose-Martinez-Jose-Rodriguez-s f) Addendum to Complaint filed with the Sheriff’s Department – alleged fraud in Booking Terminals http://www.scribd.com/doc/28322231/10-03-13-Addendum-to-Complaint-Sc2262473-Sheriff-sDepartment-re-Alleged-Fraud-in-Booking-Terminals-s 6) Case management system (CMS) of the Los Angeles County, California, Superior Court
April 19, 2010
Several records, which were written as abstracts or manuscripts, describing features of the systems, which are alleged as inherent fraud. a) Sustain – the CMS of the Civil Division of the Los Angeles Superior Court – Abstract and Figures – by Dr Joseph Zernik for Human Rights Alert http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162880/08-06-10-Beyond-Voting-Machines-Computers-the-CourtsSustain-CMS-of-the-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-Abstract-and-Figures-s b) Registers of Actions in Sustain - the CMS of the Civil Division of the Los Angeles Superior Court – Abstract and Figures – by Dr Joseph Zernik for Human Rights Alert http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162461/08-10-19-Computers-the-Courts-Sustain-CMS-of-the-LosAngeles-Superior-Court-Registers-of-Action 7) Case management system (CMS) and public access system of the US District Court, Central District of California, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit. The data is written as a solicitation for expert opinions on the validity and integrity of such system. Although the writing is based on evidence. Which originated from Los Angeles County, California, it bear much wider significance, since the same systems, PACER, and CM/ECF were installed in the past decade in the US courts throughout the US a) Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) – A Review – by Dr Joseph Zernik for Human Rights Alert http://www.scribd.com/doc/24732941/10-01-03-Notice-of-Electronic-Filing-NEF-First-AmendmentCMSs-Review b) Solicitation of Expert Opinions on PACER and CM/ECF http://www.scribd.com/doc/29525744/10-03-25-Request-for-Experts-Opinions-RE-CM-ECF-casemanagement-system-of-the-US-Dist-Court-Los-Angeles-s c) Addendum #1 to Solicitation of Expert Opinions on PACER and CM/ECF http://www.scribd.com/doc/29525890/10-03-27-Addendum-1-to-Request-for-Opinions-Re-CM-ECFcase-management-system-of-the-US-Court-of-Appeals-9th-Circuit-as-reviewed-in-orders-in-Fine d) Addendum #2 to Solicitation of Expert Opinions on PACER and CM/ECF http://www.scribd.com/doc/29527583/10-04-05-Addendum-2-to-Request-for-Experts-Opinions-RECase-management-system-NDAs-US-Court-of-Appeals-9th-Circuit-s-Us-Court-Appeals-9th-s
Dated: April 19, 2010 La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California
For Human Rights Alert
By: ______________ JOSEPH H ZERNIK PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 Phone: 323.515.4583 Fax: 323.488.9697 Email <email@example.com> Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert