0 Up votes0 Down votes

54 views14 pagesTransient Stability Notes of Kundur

Mar 06, 2016

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Transient Stability Notes of Kundur

© All Rights Reserved

54 views

Transient Stability Notes of Kundur

© All Rights Reserved

- Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster
- The Field Updated Ed: The Quest for the Secret Force of the Universe
- The Final Day: A John Matherson Novel
- Bloody Sunday: A Thriller
- WomanCode: Perfect Your Cycle, Amplify Your Fertility, Supercharge Your Sex Drive, and Become a Power Source
- The Hormone Reset Diet: The 21-day Diet That Resets Your Metabolism
- The Making of the Atomic Bomb
- Blackfish City: A Novel
- Blackfish City: A Novel
- Wheels of Life: A User's Guide to the Chakra System
- Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich
- Chernobyl 01:23:40: The Incredible True Story of the World's Worst Nuclear Disaster
- The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power
- Multipliers, Revised and Updated: How the Best Leaders Make Everyone Smarter
- Zero Hour
- The Energy Bus: 10 Rules to Fuel Your Life, Work, and Team With Positive Energy
- The Keto Reset Diet: Reboot Your Metabolism in 21 Days and Burn Fat Forever
- The Power of Full Engagement: Managing Energy, Not Time, is the Key to High Performance and Personal Renewal
- Midnight in Chernobyl: The Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster
- Positive Energy: 10 Extraordinary Prescriptions for Transforming Fatigue, Stress, and Fear into Vibrance, Strength, and Love

You are on page 1of 14

Introduction

Transient stability is the ability of the power system to maintain synchronism when

subjected to a severe transient disturbance.

It is primarily associated with parallel operation of the machines in the system, and in particular

the synchronous generators. A synchronous generator loses stability when it falls out of step,

or slips, with respect to the rest of the ac network; what happens in such a case is that the

rotor of the synchronous generator advances beyond a certain critical angle at which the

magnetic coupling between the rotor (and hence the turbine / prime mover) and the stator

fails. The rotor, no longer held in synchronism with the rotating field created by the stator

currents, rotates relative to this field and pole slipping occurs. Each time the poles traverse

the angular region where stability obtains, synchronising forces attempt to pull the rotor back

into step.

Large synchronous machines falling out of step in this manner cause violent fluctuations in the

neighbouring system voltages as well as violent groaning in the boilers feeding their turbines. A

machine or group of machines that has fallen out of step must quickly be brought back into

step or disconnected from the system.

From the theory of the synchronous machine we have already seen that under steady state

conditions the synchronising power between the rotor and stator reaches zero when the rotor

angle reaches 90 degrees (ie. the steady-state stability limit). However, as we shall see,

under transient conditions this angle may temporarily exceed 90 degrees without loss of

stability (synchronism). This is an important difference between steady state stability and

transient stability of synchronous machines (and power systems).

The transient stability limit refers to the maximum possible flow of power past a point that

will allow stability to be maintained following a sudden (generally large) disturbance. As we

shall see, the transient stability limit is lower than the steady state stability limit and is therefore

more important.

Another extremely important aspect of transient stability is that it involves large excursions in

the system variables and hence the non-linearities of the system have a considerable influence.

The characteristics of a non-linear system are different at each different operating point and for

each different disturbance and so transient stability by its very nature is analysed on a

contingency basis. For example, even for a given steady state operating point, the transient

stability limit varies with the type, duration and location of disturbances occuring in the

transmission system. Since it is impossible to examine (and make a stability judgement on)

every possible contingency, a good knowledge of the system is vital to ensure stability is

assessed for all credible contingencies.

With the advent of modern computers and powerful simulation programs it is now possible to

simulate the behaviour of power systems using fairly detailed mathematical models that include

the large-signal nonlinearities of the synchronous generators, excitation systems etc, all of

which have a significant bearing on transient stability. This then is generally the manner in

which transient stability is evaluated nowadays. However a great deal of conceptual insight

into the fundamental nature of the transient stability problem, and the factors that influence it,

can be obtained using the very simple models and graphical techniques that were employed

prior to the advent of computers.

For such conceptual analysis, the mathematical model employed is the swing-equation model,

in which the synchronous generator is represented by its rms equivalent circuit model with

constant field current (and hence constant field flux linkages). In addition, stator & transmission

line resistance and mechanical friction in the turbine are neglected such that there are no

sources of damping in the model. The only dynamics represented are those of the mechanical

system (turbine and rotor inertia). The governor dynamics are neglected and the per unit

torque and per unit power are considered equal and are used interchangeably [see Kundur pg

829]. The system model then appears as below.

E =

Angular momentum

ie

E =

1

2

M 0

1

2

J 0

Joules

Joules seconds / radian

J 0

It has been found that energy E is proportional to the machine rating G by a certain factor

known as the inertia constant H . By definition, for a machine of rating G MVA, the stored

kinetic energy

E = GH

hence

1

M0

2

1

M0

2

MW sec

MVA

rated power

The actual rotor speed

= 0 + p

Rotor acceleration

p 2

p 2

(1)

(2)

[ where p =

d

]

dt

Assuming the machine is generating (ie. is positive) with an input mechanical torque (power)

Tm and an opposing electrical torque Te . The equation of motion is then

J ( p 2 ) = Tm Te

= T

= Ta

(3)

ie a positive accelerating torque Ta causes an increase in the rotor angle as one would expect.

p 2

and since E =

T

J

(T 0 ) 0

2

J0

2

P 0

2E

M0

2

p 2

Then

Also,

Pe

EV

sin

XT

P

M

(4)

= Pmax sin

so

M p 2

= P = Pm Pmax sin

(5)

J p 2

= T

= Tm Tmax sin

The swing equation relates the difference between mechanical input power and electrical

output power, with any imbalance resulting in acceleration and (hopefully) subsequent

deceleration; ie. the system is an electro-mechanical oscillator.

Transient stability is concerned with whether or not there is sufficient restorative power

(synchronising power) to overcome an initial acceleration / deceleration following a disturbance.

If the system is transiently stable, small signal stability is thereafter concerned with whether the

electromechanical oscillations decrease in amplitude and eventually cease (positively damped)

or persist (insufficient damping) or even increase (negative damping).

Before looking at how the swing equation can be used, we need to convince ourselves of a few

inherent background characteristics associated with the machines rotor variables under

dynamic conditions.

At steady state:

= 0

For to change from one operating point to another requires temporary non-zero to

enable rotor to change position relative to stator mmf moving at 0 .

The rate at which changes is determined by the size of the speed deviation

ie.

d

( ) =

dt

= 0

ie. we need to recognise that speed deviation is proportional to the rate of change of load

angle, as well as an important consequence speed deviation and angle deviation can never be

zero simultaneously during the oscillation (90 degrees out of phase). Hence, during the electromechanical oscillations that follow a disturbance, speed deviation is at its largest when the

angle is at its equilibrium point; conversely, the angle deviation is at its largest when is

zero (ie. when = 0 ).

Now consider some examples

Generator experiences a sudden increase in shaft input power from Pm 0 to Pm1

According to steady-state theory the machine moves from operating point ( Pm0 , 0 ) to ( Pm1 , 1 )

But how does the change occur and is the system transiently stable for this change in operating

point (disturbance)?

We can deduce the answers from the swing equation and graphical techniques:

Swing eqn (eqn 3) tells us that immediately following disturbance

(input Pm > output Pe ) and rotor angle increases.

+ve acceleration

ie. until reaches 1 when Pe once again matches Pm1 .

At point b: Although Pe = Pm1 , (ie. no accel power) the rotor arrives at this point with nonzero speed, continues to increase [upwards past b towards c]

Beyond b: Pe now > Pm1 and rotor decelerates; this continues till excess speed

decreases to zero (ie. rotor returns to synch. speed) at some (as yet undetermined) angle m .

At point c: Now, although is instantaneously zero, Pe still > Pm1 so decel. continues

and becomes negative and (as decel. goes on) becomes more and more ve. Note: as

goes from +ve to ve rotor has changed direction, ie. rotor angle stops increasing and

starts decreasing at whatever angle m the speed decreases to zero.

From c to b: Rotor continues to decel. while Pe > Pm1 , so traces trajectory from m back

towards 1 at which point Pe = Pm1 and acc. power = 0. But, rotor arrives back at 1 below

synch. speed; continues to fall behind [downwards from b to a].

From b to a: At the instant the rotor falls behind correct angle 1 , Pm1 > Pe and rotor

begins to re-accelerate to get speed back up to synch.; in the finite time this takes, rotor angle

decreases back to 0 when = 0 (ie. = 0 ) but Pm still > Pe and rotor continues to

accel. whole procedure starts again.

Rotor angle oscillates between 0 and m around new steady-state value 1 . If no damping is

present, oscillations persist indefinitely. If damping is present angle oscillations decay to 1 .

Thus far we have assumed that at some angle m , returns to 0 (ie. that returns to

zero and the rotor turns around and comes back). How do we tell whether this will happen

(ie. whether stability is maintained) and what m will be?

Equal Area Criterion

In order to answer these questions we now consider the mathematics of the swing equation

[eqn (5)] in more detail; the equation is non-linear and so cannot be solved directly thus

either we use numerical integration (computer simulation) or graphical techniques. Multiplying

d

we get

both sides of eqn (4) by 2

dt

d

2

dt

d

2

dt

2

dt

d d

dt dt

2

M

P d

2P d

M dt

(6)

Equation (6) gives a closed-form expression for the speed deviation = d dt (all squared) of

the machine following a disturbance. As we have seen, the speed deviation is initially zero at

steady state, but then changes following a disturbance. For stable operation of the system

following a disturbance the time response of the rotor angle must be bounded, that is to

say that the rotor angle must reach some maximum value m on its first post-disturbance

swing. As we have already seen, if this is the case, the speed deviation of the machine is zero

when it reaches this maximum rotor angle m . Thus from eqn (6) as a criterion for stability we

can write

2

M

( Pm Pe ) d

= 0

(7)

where 0 is the initial rotor angle and m is the maximum rotor angle to which the machine

swings after the disturbance. In other words, eqn (7) is saying that the system will remain

stable (bounded response) provided the system can reach a post-fault situation where the

speed deviation reaches zero, and at which the rotor angle will then have stopped increasing

(and by extension will subsequently start decreasing from m ). Furthermore from (7) we see

that we can simplify the criterion further by dividing both sides by 2 M to yield

m

( Pm Pe ) d

= 0

(8)

Eqn (8) leads to an insightful graphical and physical understanding of the stability criterion.

Firstly, from mathematics we can interpret / equate the integral in eqn (8) to the area under

the graph of the function ( Pm Pe ) plotted against , which must then be zero between 0

and m if the system is to be stable. Splitting the integral in (8) into two parts we have

m

( Pm Pe ) d

( Pm Pe ) d

= 0

(9)

(Area A1 ) + (Area A2 ) = 0

(9)

In Fig. 1 this is satisfied because the positive area A1 enclosed between the Pe and Pm curves

from 0 to 1 (positive since Pm > Pe from 0 to 1 ) is equal to the negative area A2

enclosed between Pe and Pm from 1 to m (negative since Pm < Pe from 1 to m ). A

further useful insight is gained by recognising that the area A1 from 0 to 1 is equal to the

kinetic energy E1 (positive) gained by the rotor during its acceleration as changes from 0

to 1 . If the system is to have a stable (bounded) response, clearly the energy gained during

acceleration must be returned during a later deceleration and hence eqn (9) can be rewritten as

E1

E2

= 0

(10)

Equations (8) and (9) form the mathematical basis for what is known as the equal-area

criterion for assessing the stability of a synchronous machine connected to a power system.

The criterion can be used to determine the maximum permissible (step) increase in the

mechanical power P = Pm1 Pm0 in the previous example: in this case the system will remain

stable provided an area A2 above the new value of Pm can be found to match the area A1

below the new value of Pm . As already seen in Fig. 1, in finding this area A2 we

simultaneously find the value of the maximum rotor angle m that occurs in the ensuing

transient response (why?). However, what of our earlier question how big can m be before

stability is lost?

bigger disturbance, in this case a bigger increase in Pm (why?). As the new value of Pm

increases, the maximum possible positive value of A2 (area above Pm and below Pe ) becomes

smaller and the area A1 becomes bigger. Physically this means that as the step increase in Pm

gets bigger more energy is being accumulated by the rotor during its initial acceleration but,

paradoxically, there is less possibility of returning this excess energy to the transmission system

during the subsequent deceleration. This is illustrated in Fig. 2 for three values of P , each

progressively larger than the small value of P illustrated in Fig. 1.

The diagram in Fig. 2 (a) shows the situation for a moderate increase in Pm . The diagram in

Fig. 2 (a) illustrates firstly that because of the larger step increase in input power, the new

equilibrium value of load angle (at which Pm is matched by Pe ) is, as expected, larger than that

of Fig. 1 in which the step increase in Pm was small.

The diagram also illustrates that, because of this larger increase in Pm the positive area

enclosed below the new Pm curve and above the P curve is now larger since a greater

kinetic energy is imparted to, and stored in, the rotor by the time it has accelerated from 0 to

its new equilibrium angle 1 . However the diagram shows that despite the increase in area A1 ,

a matching negative area A2 can still be found above the Pm curve and below the P curve.

However, graphically, since the matching area A2 must now be larger, consequently the rotor

has to swing to a greater value of m in order for the increased energy stored in the rotor

during acceleration to be returned to the transmission system during subsequent deceleration

(physically speaking, the rotor has to decelerate for longer to return all its excess energy, and

in doing so its rotor angle opens out to a larger value of m ).

Finally, Fig. 2 (a) shows that for this moderate step increase in Pm there is reserve (unused

but available) decelerating energy corresponding to area A3 : that is the rotor could, if

required, open out to a larger angle to continue the deceleration of the rotor and hence there

is a stability margin in the system for this magnitude of step increase in Pm .

The diagram in Fig. 2 (b) shows the situation for a large increase in Pm . The diagram

illustrates that, even for this large step increase Pm , an area above the Pm and below the

P curve (negative accelerating energy) can still be found to match the large area A1 below

the Pm curve (positive acc. energy). Again, as expected, this even larger increase in Pm

requires an even larger new equilibrium value of load angle 1 and hence a larger value of

maximum rotor angle m as the rotor decelerates for even longer to transfer its excess kinetic

energy out into the transmission system.

However, in Fig. 2 (b) there is now no unused area A3 above the Pm curve and below the

P curve: for this particular disturbance the rotor has transferred as much absorbed kinetic

energy to the transmission system as it is able to do, since any further opening out of the rotor

angle past m = L would result in a positive area between the Pm and P curves. Thus

there is no unused capacity to decelerate the rotor in the case of this disturbance and the

system is at the limit of transient (first-swing) stability.

Finally, the diagram of Fig. 2 (c) shows the situation for an excessive increase in Pm . The

diagram illustrates that for this step increase Pm the area A1 below Pm and above the P

curve (positive Pm Pe integral wrt ) cannot be matched by an equal area A2 above Pm

and below the P curve (negative Pm Pe integral wrt ). That the system is unstable

following this increase Pm can be seen both from the graphical and physical interpretations

of the diagram in Fig. 2 (c).

Graphically, any area enclosed by Pm and the P curve to the right of the limiting value of

load angle L is by definition positive and therefore adds to the positive area A1 . Hence if the

negative area A2 enclosed by the Pm and P curves between 1 and L is not equal to or

greater than the positive area A1 , the criterion in eqn (9) can never be satisfied even if

continues to open out to m and beyond (which it will !) and the system is thus unstable

(for this disturbance).

Physically, the generator rotor accelerates from its initial steady angle 0 to the new angle 1

required for the machines electrical power conversion Pe to match the new mechanical input

power Pm1 , and gains excessive positive kinetic energy E1 = (area A1 ) in doing so. As in all

previous cases, the rotor angle continues to open out past the required equilibrium value of 1

since it arrives at this value of 1 with non-zero speed deviation + (excess kinetic energy).

Along the subsequent trajectory from b to c the electrical power Pe generated by the machine

exceeds the mechanical input power Pm1 and the machine rotor decelerates, its excess kinetic

energy being transferred to electrical energy in the transmission system. However by the time

the rotor angle opens out to L at point c this deceleration process has not succeeded in

removing all excess positive kinetic energy from the rotor (because the decelerating energy

E 2 = (area A2 ) is less than the positive accelerating energy E1 = (area A1 ) ) and so the rotor

arrives at angle L still with excess positive kinetic energy (shaft speed > synch 0 ). With

this excess shaft speed the rotor angle continues to increase, but for values of > L the

diagram shows that the generated electrical power Pe is less than the input mechanical power

Pm1 , and hence the machine rotor is once again subjected to a net positive accelerating power

Pa = Pm Pe .

Thus as soon as the angle opens out past L the machine is past the point of no return: the

rotor speed is still larger than 0 and so the angle continues to increase, but as it does so it

suffers ever greater positive accelerating power Pa and the machine speed must continue to

increase and the rotor angle will run away until the machine starts to pole slip and stability is

lost.

Note also and very importantly that the system in Fig. 2 (c) is steady state stable at the

new value of mechanical input power Pm1 : there is a value of load angle 1 on the upward

slope of the P curve at which the machine is able to match the input mechanical power Pm1

with generated electrical power Pe1 and hence remain at synchronous speed. However the

system is not able to move to this stable steady state operating point ( Pe1 , 1 ) from the initial

steady state operating point ( Pe0 , 0 ) via a step change in the input power Pm . The system

may however be able to survive a more gradual increase in Pm to take it to point ( Pe1 , 1 ).

The other interesting counter point [cf. Fig 2 (b)] is that under transient conditions the machine

can swing past the steady state stability limit ( = 90 $ ) and still remain stable. This illustrates

two important points. Firstly, there is a difference between steady-state and transient

stability; the fact that the system is steady state stable at a post-disturbance operating point

does not necessarily imply that it can stably arrive at that operating point following that

disturbance. Secondly, transient stability is highly dependent on the nature of the disturbance

in this case a less severe way of changing the system input from its pre- to post-disturbance

values could allow stability to be maintained. As a result, describing a system as transiently

stable can strictly only be done with reference to a particular disturbance or contingency (or set

of contingencies) and this is where realistic scenario planning and knowledge of the

system is important.

Examples of such contingencies follow. [ see also: Kundur pp 829 (loss of line) and 833 (short

circuit fault) ]

Generator inertia

Generator loading

Generator output (power transfer) during fault depends on fault location and fault type

Generator reactance

Generator internal voltage magnitude this depends on field excitation, ie. the power factor

of the power sent out at the generator terminals

What do we know about transient stability?

Equal area criterion approach to analysis has shown that we need to consider stability on a

contingency basis, in each case determining whether the system has sufficient capacity to

decelerate (or accelerate) the generator rotor after a fault is cleared.

Equal area criterion approach has also shown that the key to ensuring transient stability is

maintained is the ability to transfer rapidly any excess energy (either +ve or ve) out of

the rotor and into the transmission system, both during (if possible) and after the fault.

(a) An important problem associated with severe faults: the voltage at the terminals of the

generator can drop significantly. (Why?)

(b) That the consequence of this temporary drop in terminal voltage is a reduction in the

all-important ability to transfer synchronising power out of the generator.

(b) That the solution is to get the terminal voltage back up as soon as possible.

The generators automatic voltage regulator (AVR) works through the excitation system to

maintain (within reason) constant generator terminal voltage. Thus the AVR plays a crucial role

with respect to transient stability, by attempting to maintain terminal volts under fault

conditions and ensuring a fast terminal voltage recovery profile after the fault is cleared.

Under transient conditions, to get the best (fastest) possible terminal voltage recovery profile,

the attributes of an excitation system that are beneficial are high speed and high ceiling

voltage so as to overcome the inherent delay of the field circuit.

The excitation control solution (for transient stability) is a high-gain, fast-response exciter with

high ceiling voltage and an AVR.

We will see, however, that this approach is detrimental to the damping of the generator rotor

oscillations, but that the problem can be fixed.

The AVR works by forcing the field voltage in such a way as to maintain the flux levels in the

synchronous machine under fault conditions in opposition to the tendency of the flux to be

diminished by the effects of armature reaction. This in turn maintains the terminal voltage and

hence the ability of the generator to continue to transfer power onto the busbars.

Note: the effects of armature reaction on flux levels are particularly pronounced during faults

because the fault currents are large and predominantly (lagging) reactive in nature (ie. the

reactive output power of the generator is large under fault conditions).

The longer the fault duration and the closer the fault is to the generator terminals, the worse

this effect gets...

consequently, the more difficult it becomes for the AVR to maintain constant flux linkages.

Modern trends have contributed to lower stability margins:

Increased generator ratings, lower inertias and higher reactances

Increasing interconnection and reliance on the transmission system to carry generator

loading

This has led to increased reliance on excitation control.

The use of fast exciters allows operation with higher system series reactances, but there is a

view that these gains cannot go on forever. Indeed, modern exciters are now virtually

instantaneous, so any further increases in system performance in this regard will require

alternative methods of compensation.

METHODS OF IMPROVING TRANSIENT STABILITY

These can broadly be categorised as

(a) Reduction of the disturbance (fault severity and duration)

(b) Increase restorative synchronising forces

(c) Reduce accelerating power (torque) mechanically or by artificial load

High-speed fault clearing

Reduction of transmission system reactance

Dynamic (FACTS)

Dynamic braking

Single pole switching

Fast valving

Generator tripping

High-speed excitation systems

Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS)

- Kalmar Cargotec RTG E One Generator and AVRUploaded byMao LiuGong
- power generation using speed breakerUploaded byChetan Tiwary
- Project report- THDCILUploaded byMukesh Verma
- DATASHEET ALTERNADOR HCI544E1.pdfUploaded byDilham Berrio
- A Noobs Guide to UfopoliticsUploaded byPraveen240679
- Load Commutated InverterUploaded byKVV
- Dse7110 Mkii Dse7120 Mkii Data SheetUploaded bymnvijaybabu
- Stability ObservationUploaded byZahra Gh
- AC motor-(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_motor)Uploaded byLila Carey
- y 04404152158Uploaded byAnonymous 7VPPkWS8O
- Basic Motors LectureUploaded bybrianeugenek-general1841
- IS -ISO - 10816(2) - 2001Uploaded bysangitaghaisas
- Optimization and Control of a Variable Speed Wind Turbine with a Permanent Magnet Synchronous GeneratorUploaded byseventhsensegroup
- 2332x_07Uploaded bydeepcservihoo
- JP200(1506)Uploaded byMohamed Osman
- Acm Webinar FinalUploaded byamericana91
- Acm Webinar FinalUploaded bymatheus735
- Magnetism.pptxUploaded byJonathan David
- Electrical Engineering (EE)_06.03.18Uploaded byDeep Shree
- L9407Uploaded byGilvan Melo
- Eaton's 70kw Owner's Manual With Nexus 77PUploaded byNeil Love
- s-1634Uploaded byJess Templario Bonilla
- Natural Gas Generator Set QSK60 Series EngineUploaded byricva_rj
- 880 DFHD.pdfUploaded bycoke31
- final.pdfUploaded byAnonymous se0erqbj
- QSK60 Spec SheetUploaded bybacuoc.nguyen356
- EE_POWER-SYSTEMS.pdfUploaded byJagan Rampalli
- 03~model solutions 3 (2)Uploaded byChaitanya Bhargav Kotike
- Machines 2 Tutorial 2 2015Uploaded byashauni
- GPU.pdfUploaded byShikhaNeeraj Aggarwal

- Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Disc Machines - A ReviewUploaded byMostafa Ahmadi
- Bosch20182019 Catalog - Routerssandersplaners-specialtyUploaded byrasim_m1146
- Bosch20182019 Catalog - Woodmetalcutting-2Uploaded byrasim_m1146
- Bosch20182019 Catalog - Taps and DiesUploaded byrasim_m1146
- 000301_RET54_RNENa_755546Uploaded byrasim_m1146
- Rems Katalog 2015 GbropUploaded byrasim_m1146
- Click and CleanUploaded byrasim_m1146
- 2_Transient Stability ImprovementUploaded byrasim_m1146
- Self-healing Control With Multifunctional Gate Drive Circuits ForUploaded byrasim_m1146
- Permanent Magnet Motor Drives With Switched Stator WindingsUploaded byrasim_m1146
- 21128 Robin Shortform Catalogue 2014 v7Uploaded byrasim_m1146
- 20750Uploaded byrasim_m1146
- 13562-engUploaded byrasim_m1146
- 1758-in001_-en-pUploaded byrasim_m1146
- 001_018Uploaded byOgar Ojugbo
- Power Electronics and Power SystemsUploaded byrasim_m1146
- Electrical Machines and DrivesUploaded byanon-427532
- Electric Vehicles Modelling and SimulationsUploaded byrasim_m1146
- Low Voltage Ride-Through Capability for Wind Turbines Based on Current Source Inverter TopologiesUploaded byMostafa8425
- 10_STATORUploaded byrasim_m1146
- k 0726880Uploaded byrasim_m1146
- IJETAE_1013_117Uploaded byrasim_m1146
- 2372531Uploaded byrasim_m1146
- 19582Uploaded byrasim_m1146
- 00005177_74179Uploaded byrasim_m1146
- 2007-02-28：【技術專題】From Motor Design to Motor ControlUploaded byni60
- An Alternative for All-Electric Ships ApplicationsUploaded byrasim_m1146
- Advanced Electric Machine TheoryUploaded byAzemi Yakub

- 3G Cluster Pre-OptimizationUploaded byAditya Nama
- Man Dds HardUploaded byAl Zanoaga
- HSPICE TutorialUploaded bySreyas Mohan
- emUploaded byandhracolleges
- Parametric ResonatorsUploaded byWellu Jutila
- Modular Alarm Platform 5000 OverviewUploaded byMounir
- InsulGard ManualUploaded byPriti Kumari
- sboa017Uploaded byapi-3725139
- Neyveli Lignite dtl.pdfUploaded byPapun Scribd
- Analytical Determination of Electrical Machine Winding LayoutUploaded byAJER JOURNAL
- Automation_of_Real_Time_Monitoring_and_C.pdfUploaded bysyahyandini angga
- Instructions for Dish Network Dish Pro Plus InstallationUploaded byJake Masters
- Nokia_5G_mmWave_Revolution_White_Paper_EN.pdfUploaded byGek Cagatan
- A New Stochastic Model of Electric Arc Furnace Based on Hidden Markov Model - A Study of Its Effects on the Power System - IEEE Tr.pd - 2012Uploaded byM8ow6f
- Physical DesignUploaded bySureshbabu Kadavakollu
- BK Precision 2709Uploaded byflorinssl
- Actron Gm Code Scanner Cp9001Uploaded byLuisa Rondón
- Guidelines for Sizing of Power CablesUploaded byelectrical_1012000
- Wheatstone BridgeUploaded bySilvio Madety
- Introduction to Computer SystemUploaded byIrfan Fazail
- Cargador de Baterias Deif 12 y 24 VdcUploaded byPBernal J Arthur
- Automation syllabusUploaded byIndrajit Sodha
- DEN-1BUploaded bytapion0007
- Interference Automation Jan28Uploaded byNachiket Jog
- 7SR224 - Argus Complete Technical ManualUploaded byWilliam Mendieta
- AhmedA.the (Final Comments1)Uploaded byeng_celiofilho
- Aljabar BoleanUploaded byEko Yang Tak Seberapa
- Special Topics 2 - Review [04feb'12]Uploaded byJerina Jeneth Cruz Francisco
- ATS Drawing (R0) 30-Oct-12Uploaded byShrikant Kajale
- WiFly-RN-171-DSUploaded byJorge EA

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.