You are on page 1of 11

Johns Hopkins University

School of Education
Explorations in Mind, Brain, and Teaching
ED.887.615
Homewood Campus
Instructor:

Dr. Mariale Hardiman


410-516-8225
mmhardiman@jhu.edu

Asst. Instructors:
Luke Rinne
410-516-8225
lrinne@jhu.edu
Emma Gregory
410-516-8225
Credit Hours:

30

Class Time:
Course Description: During the past decade the cognitive and neurological
sciences have produced a vast frontier of knowledge on how the brain
processes, stores, and retrieves information. Educators have increasingly
recognized a role as consumers of this emerging knowledge. Participants in
the course will review this research, examining how it intersects with the
correlates of research-based effective teaching and the teaching of the arts
across content areas. Topics of study will include the brains memory
systems, the impact of emotions on learning, the processes involved in
higher order thinking and learning, and issues related to child development.
Participants will apply course studies to the creation of learning units that
emphasize application of knowledge and the integration of the arts.

Course Objectives:
Students will demonstrate their understanding for each the following topics:
1. The ABCs of Brain Anatomy/ How the Human Brain Processes
Information
Identify brain organization and structure

Describe how learning occurs at the cellular level


Describe how information proceeds from perception to attention and
from attention to memory
Describe how research in the cognitive and neurological sciences
intersects with effective teaching strategies
Describe the components of the Brain-Targeted Teaching Model
Explore how arts integration transforms schools and classrooms

2. Setting the Emotional Climate for LearningBrain-Target One


Define structures and functions of the brains emotional center
Identify factors that cause stress for students in school
Design general strategies, including artful strategies such as
movement and theater, for reducing stress and promoting a positive
emotional climate in the classroom
Design evaluation tool for a teacher/administrator to assess
classroom climate
Design specific strategies to connect emotions to learning in a BTT
learning unit
3. Designing the Physical Learning EnvironmentBrain-Target Two
Describe how order, organization, attractive displays, and novelty in
the learning environment can enhance learning
Identify ways to change the environment and use art to add depth
to content displays with each learning unit
Design a checklist for optimal school and classroom learning
environments
Design specific strategies to provide optimal learning environment
in a BTT learning unit
4. Designing the Learning ExperienceBrain-Target Three
Describe how prior knowledge of content, concepts, and skills can
be incorporated into daily instruction
Use Maryland State Content Standards, Maryland Arts Standards,
and Core Learning Goals to design global instructional goals

Design concept maps to provide students with an overall picture


of instructional goals

Use instructional goals to design objectives that state what


students will know and be able to do as a result of instruction

Design specific instructional objectives based on global goals and


content standards in a BTT learning unit
5. Teaching for MasteryBrain-Target Four

Describe the brains memory systems--procedural, declarative,


episodic, semantic
Explain the distinctions between how the brain processes working
and long-term memories
Identify artful strategies to present information to allow for repeated
rehearsals and in-depth understanding of concepts and content
Design instructional activities that integrate multiple modalities and
multi-disciplines into the learning experience
Design instructional activities that integrate the visual arts, music,
drama, and movement into the learning experience
Design specific instructional activities to teach for mastery
declarative and procedural knowledge in a BTT learning unit

6. Teaching for the Extension and Application of LearningBrain-Target


Five
Describe how the brains modular learning system suggests the use
of active, experiential learning activities to extend and refine
students learning
Design general instructional strategies that extend and refine
students learning through real-world problem-solving tasks
Design specific instructional strategies to extend and apply acquired
knowledge in a BTT learning unit
Describe the distinction between divergent thinking and convergent
thinking
Describe the cognitive and neural processes associated with
creativity
7. Evaluating LearningBrain-Target Six
Design multiple evaluation systems such as the use of oral and
written probes, rubrics, student portfolios, student-generated
products, and performance-based assessments
Design specific evaluation instruments to correspond with the
components of the BTT learning unit that they designed throughout
the professional development session
Course Standards
Maryland Voluntary State Curriculum Content Standards, Maryland Arts
Standards, and Core Learning Goals apply to this course. Please review them
through the MSDE website: www.mdk12.org.

Required Text and Other Materials


Hardiman, M. (2003). Connecting brain research with effective teaching: The
Brain-Targeted Teaching Model. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Posner, M. I. & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Educating the human brain.
Washington, D.C.:
American Psychological Association.
Copies of any additional required readings will be handed out in class or on
the ELC.
Assignments
Five teams of students (3-4 students per team) will be formed; these teams
will collaborate on certain course assignments.
Online Discussion of Posner & Rothbart Chapters (Due daily, 7/8-7/15)
Each team will start an online discussion in the Electronic Learning
Community (ELC) for one chapter in the Posner & Rothbart book. Prior to the
class when the reading is due, each member of the group will start a
separate discussion thread with a short paragraph that expresses a
comment, question, idea, etc. (something broad and insightful enough to
elicit thoughtful responses). Team members should consult with one another
to make sure that the groups thread starters differ in scope and
complement one another.
All students in the class should reply to two different thread starters
before the following days class. In addition, students should post at least
one follow-up to another students response in the other thread(s).
Students are encouraged to post additional follow-ups in any thread. When
considering which posts to reply to or follow-up on, look for those that dont
already have responses. The instructors will start the online discussion for
the first chapter in order to provide an idea of what is expected. The
instructors will also monitor/participate in online discussions throughout the
course.
Research Connection Project (Due 7/30)
Students will focus on one component of the Brain-Targeted Teaching Model
and connect it to a relevant area of research and/or current educational
initiative. For example, Brain-Target Three, Designing the Learning
Experience connects with Understanding by Design (Wigging & McTighe,
1998). Students will prepare a 7-10 page paper that analyzes the relationship

between the Brain-Target and the research/initiative, noting similarities and


differences as well as implications for classroom practice.
Learning Unit Design (Due 7/16)
Teams will use the Maryland Voluntary State Curriculum Content Standards,
Maryland Art Standards and/or Core Learning Goals to design an artsintegrated learning unit that incorporates the components of the BrainTargeted Teaching Model. Participants can choose the grade level and
content focus. The learning unit will be prepared in written format using the
BTT template. In order to share the learning unit with colleagues, the team
will prepare a 15 minute PowerPoint presentation on the learning unit and
present it to the class. Each member of the team will receive the same
grade. Equal participation is expected.

Evaluation and Grading


Attendance/Participation/Class Projects (15 points)
Online Discussion of Posner & Rothbart (25 points)
Emergent Proficien
t
Thread starter
1-3
4-7
Thread replies
1-3
4-7
Follow-ups
1
2-3
Research Connection Project (30 points)
Emergent Proficien
t
Analysis of Research
1-3
4-7
Analysis of Connection
1-3
4-7
to Brain-Target
Application to
1-3
4-7
Classroom Practice
Learning Unit Design (30 points)
Emergent
Lesson thoroughly
describes all six BTT
components
PPT demonstrates each
Brain-Target
Presentation is
engaging and succinct

Superior
8-10
8-10
4-5
Superior
8-10
8-10
8-10

Superior

1-5

Proficien
t
6-10

1-3

4-7

8-10

2-3

4-5

11-15

Late Assignments:
It is expected that assignments will be turned in on the due dates. Late
assignments will be subject to grade reductions. Extenuating circumstances
should be discussed with the instructor.
Resubmitted Assignments:
Students may resubmit assignments with a grade of B or lower.
Resubmissions may earn up to half the point differential between the original
grade and the value of the assignment, and should be turned in within one
week after the graded assignment is received by the student.
Grading Scale
A
= 94% and above
A= 90-93%
B+ = 87-89%
B
= 84-86%
B= 80-83%
C+ = 77-79%
C
= 74-76%
C= 70-73%
F
= below 70%
The grades of D+, D, and D- are not awarded at the graduate level.
Attendance Policy: Students are expected to attend all classes punctually
and participate fully in all in-class group activities and assignments.
Contact the instructor about emergency situations or other attendance
related issues as soon as they arise, before scheduled class sessions.
Unexplained lateness/absence may lead to penalties in the final course
grade.

Course Outline
Date

Topic

Introductio
n to Mind,
Brain, and
Teaching

7/6

Activities
1. Introduction dyads
2. Review of course syllabus
3. Building a Circuit-Diagram for the Brain: Video clip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kRrarRR2kk
4. Power Point Presentation Part 1: Introduction to the BrainTargeted Teaching Model
5. Introduction to Electronic Learning Community (ELC)
6. Formation of teams and assignment of Posner & Rothbart
chapters

Due Dates

Introductio
n to BrainTargeted
Teaching

1.
2.
3.
4.

1. Questions/Brief Discussion of Posner & Rothbart, Ch. 1


2. Discussion/Activities, Brain-Target 1
Video Clip: Stress and Memory (1:35)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHl7BewJ0yU
Neuroscientist Richard Davidson presents his research
on how social and emotional learning can affect the
brain.(20.06) http://www.edutopia.org/richarddavidson-sel-brain-video
Immordino-Yang & Damasio (2008). We feel therefore
we learn.
Small Group Activity: Identify factors within and outside
the classroom that cause stress for children and affect
learning. Suggest strategies to reduce the effects of
stress in the classroom.
3. Guest lecture: Linda Gorman

Hardiman, Ch. 4

7/8

BT 1:
Emotional
Climate

BT 2:

Hardiman, Ch. 5

7/9

Physical
Environme
nt

1. Questions/Brief Discussion of Posner & Rothbart, Ch. 2


2. Discussion/Activities, Brain-Target 2
Video: Professional Skills - Positive Learning
Environment Primary (30 min)
http://www.teachers.tv/video/17831
Standen, A., (2007). Space craft: Feng shui principles
transform a classroom
Nair, P. & Fielding, R., (2007). A comfortable truth.
Edutopia April/May 30-32.

7/7

Power Point Presentation Part 2: Brain-Targets 1-6


BTT teacher interviews http://www.youtube.com/BTTmodel
Demonstration of BTT learning units
Small Group Activity: Teams brainstorm ideas for learning
units

5
7/12

BT 3:
Learning
Design

Hardiman, Ch. 13
Hardiman, The
Creative-Artistic
Brain
Posner &
Rothbart, Ch. 1

Posner &
Rothbart, Ch. 2

Small Group Activity: Design a checklist for optimal


school and classroom learning environments to be
included in the schools improvement plan.

1. Questions/Brief Discussion of Posner & Rothbart, Ch. 3


2. Discussion/Activities, Brain-Target 3
Video: Synopsis of Mind Mapping (27.58)
http://www.teachers.tv/video/121
Video Clip: Inspiration Concept Map Tutorial (5:23)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=XTfo3EIZViM&feature=related
Small Group Activity: Design a concept map based on
global goals and content standards in a designated
unit of study
3. Guest Lecture: Stephen Hsaio, Plasticity
4. Guest Lecture: Susan Rome, Big Picture Thinking, The
Arts, and Children with Disabilities

Hardiman, Ch. 6
Posner &
Rothbart, Ch. 3

6
7/13

7
7/14

8
7/15

BT 4:
Teaching
for
Mastery

1. Questions/Brief Discussion of Posner & Rothbart, Ch. 4


2. Discussion/Activities, Brain-Target 4
Mapping Memory in the Brain, Eric Kandel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCkji-0aqHo
Slides: History of research on Learning and Memory
(MIT)
Memory through Arts Integration: The Dana Studies on
Arts and Cognition: Learning, Arts, and the Brain
Small Group Activity: Brainstorm multiple ways to
present a given instructional objective to increase
repetitions, provide differentiation, and engage all
students in the learning activity. Integrate visual arts,
music, drama, or movement to the chosen activities.
3. Guest Lecture: Clare Grizzard, Arts Integration and BTT

Hardiman, Ch. 7

BT 5:
Teaching
for
Application

1. Questions/Brief Discussion of Posner & Rothbart, Ch. 5


2. Discussion/Activities, Brain-Target 5
Video Clip: Music and Dance Drive Academic
Achievement (8:45) http://www.edutopia.org/artsopening-minds-integration-video
Limb Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgQkaT0SvM
Art Works: Integrating Creativity in the Curriculum
(6:19) http://www.edutopia.org/art-works
Small Group Activity: Discuss how arts integration may
help students think more critically about content in
traditional subject matter areas and encourage them
to apply what they have learned in unique and creative
ways.

Hardiman, Ch. 8

BT 6:
Evaluating
Learning

1. Questions/Brief Discussion of Posner & Rothbart, Ch. 6


2. Discussion/Activites, Brain-Target 6
Karpicke & Roediger (2008). The critical importance of
retrieval for learning.
Cepeda et al. (2008). Spacing effects in learning.

Hardiman, Ch. 9

9
7/16

Course
Conclusion

Small Group Activity: Consider how evaluation


practices might be informed by the recognition that
tests and quizzes serve not just as measurements, but
also as opportunities for students to consolidate and
reinforce their knowledge.

1. Learning unit presentations


2. Course wrap up
3. Evaluations

Posner &
Rothbart, Ch. 4

Posner &
Rothbart, Ch. 5

Posner &
Rothbart, Ch. 6
Research
Connection
Paper Due

Learning Units
Due

Classroom Accommodations for Students with Disabilities


If you are a student with a documented disability who requires an academic
adjustment, auxiliary aid or other similar accommodations, please
contact Karen Salinas in the Disability Services Office at 410-516-9823
or via email at ksalinas@jhu.edu.

Statement of Diversity and Inclusion


Johns Hopkins University is a community committed to sharing values of
diversity and inclusion in order to achieve and sustain excellence. We
believe excellence is best promoted by being a diverse group of students,
faculty, and staff who are committed to creating a climate of mutual respect
that is supportive of one anothers success. Through its curricula and clinical
experiences, the Department of Interdisciplinary Studies/Division of
Education purposefully supports the Universitys goal of diversity, and, in
particular, works toward an ultimate outcome of best serving the needs of all
students in K-12 schools and/or the community. Faculty and candidates are
expected to demonstrate a commitment to diversity as it relates to planning,
instruction, management, and assessment.
IDEA Course Evaluation
Please remember to complete the IDEA course evaluation for this course.
These evaluations are an important tool in the School of Educations ongoing
efforts to improve instructional quality and strengthen its programs. The
results of the IDEA course evaluations are kept anonymousyour instructor
will only receive aggregated data and comments for the entire class.
Typically, an email with a link to the online course evaluation form will be
sent to your JHU email address approximately 85% of the way through the
course. Thereafter, you will be sent periodic email reminders until you
complete the evaluation. The deadline for completing the evaluation is
normally one week after the last meeting of class. Please remember to
activate your JHU email account and to check it regularly. (Please note that it
is the School of Educations policy to send all faculty, staff, and student email
communications to a JHU email address, rather than to personal or
alternative work email addresses.) If you are unsure how to activate your JHU
email account, if youre having difficulty accessing the course evaluations or
you havent received an email reminder by the day of the last class, or if you
have any questions in general about the IDEA course evaluation process,
please contact Rhodri Evans (410-516-0741; idea@jhu.edu).

Bibliography
Barber, J., Barrett, K., Beals, K., Bergman, L., & Diamond, M. (1996). Learning
about learning. Berkeley: LHS GEMS.
Caine, G. & Caine, R. (2001). The brain, education, and the competitive
edge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education

Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain.
New York: Harcourt.
Diamond, M. & Hopson, J. (1999). Magic trees of the mind. New York: Penguin
Group.
Feinstein, S. (ed). (2006). The Praeger handbook of learning and the brain.
Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group
Gazzaniga, M. (2005). The ethical brain. New York: Dana Press.
Goleman, D. (1997). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ.
New York: Bantam Books.
Hibbard, K. M. (1996). Performance-based learning and assessment.
Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Howard, P.J. (2000). The owners manual for the brain. Atlanta: Bard Press.
Jensen, E. (2000). Brain-based learning. San Diego: The Brain Store.
Jensen, E. (2000). Different brains, different learners: How to reach the hard
to reach. San Diego: The Brain Store.
Kandel, E. (2006). In search of memory: The emergence of a new science of
mind. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Kaufeldt, M. (1999). Begin with the brain: Orchestrating the leaner-centered
classroom. Chicago: Zephyr Press.
Marzano, R. J. (1992). A different kind of classroom: Teaching with
Dimensions of Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D.J., Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that
works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement.
Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Ratey, J.J. (2002). A users guide to the brain: Perception, attention, and the
four theaters of the brain. New York: Vintage Books.
Ratey, J.J. (2008). Spark: The revolutionary new science of exercise and the
brain. New York: Little, Brown & Co.
Rose, S. (2005). The future of the brain: The promise and perils of
tomorrows neuroscience. Oxford: University Press.

Shonkoff, J.P. & Philips, D. A.,eds. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods:


The science of early childhood development. Washington, D.C.: National
Academy of Sciences
Silver, H. F., Strong, R.W., & Perini, M. J. (2000). So each may learn:
Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences. Alexandria, VA:
ASCD.
Sprenger, M. (1999). Learning & memory: The brain in action. Alexandria, VA:
ASCD.
Stevenson, L.M. & Deasy, R.J. (2005). Third space: When learning matters.
Arts Education Partnership, Washington, D.C.
Tate, M. L. (2003). Worksheets dont grow dendrites. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Corwin Press, Inc.
Tomlinson, A. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction
and understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. Alexandria,
VA: ASCD.
Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (1998) Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA:
ASCD
Willingham, D.T. (2009). Why dont students like school? San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Wolfe, P. (2001). Brain matters: Translating research into classroom practice.
Alexandria, VA: ASCD.