You are on page 1of 21

Universidade Fernando Pessoa

Porto, Portugal

Basic Principles in Tectonics


5- Tectonic Regimes in Sedimentary Basins
Contents:
5.2- Basement not involved (cont.)
5.2.2- Shaly mobile substratum
A) Compressional structures
B) Extensional structures
B.1- Plasticity
B.2- Undercompaction
B.3- Fault displacement
B. 4- Fault associated with shale tectonics
B.5- Growth fault displacements
B. 6- Growth faults and traps

5.2- Basement not involved (cont.)


http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

5.2.2. - Shaly mobile substratum


As for deformations associated with an evaporitic mobile substratum, deformations
associated with sedimentary sequences above a shaly substratum can also be expressed in
terms of lengthening (extension) and shortening (compression).

A) Compressional Structures
Detached compressional structures, i.e. anticlines and reverses faults or thrusts above a
mobile shaly substratum, can be associated with regional or local tectonic regimes (fig. 270).

Fig. 270- Above the detachment plane (top of the mobile substratum), the
compressional structures follow the conventional tectonic rulers. When 3 is
vertical, anticlines and reverse fault strike parallel to 2. Generally, the
reverse faults are in relay forming a typical pattern as illustrated in the
sketch.

Reverse faults have been recognized in deep offshore of Nigeria and in the Mississippi
deep sea fan in association with shalokinesis, in which gravity plays an important role
(fig. 271). Similarly, they have been recognized in the trenches of convergent margins and
accretionary prism (fig. 272), Here, are also shale tectonics plays an important role in spite
of the fact that shortening is mainly created by a regional compressional tectonic regime.

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

Fig. 272- Reverse faults in association with local or regional tectonic regimes
are well know in deep offshore Nigeria and in accretionary prisms of
convergent margins as for instance in deep offshore Barbados.

Notice that generally the bottom of a mobile substratum is very difficult to recognize.
However, when it can be seen, contrariwise to the bottom of a evaporitic layer, a negative
velocity anomaly (pull-down) is present in association with the tectonic dysharmony, i.e. the
detachment or dcollement surface.

B) Extensional Structures
Lengthening can be associated with a tectonic stress positive (st >0) with shale ridges are
partially developed parallel to the regional s3 and local stresses in the apex of the ridges
create stretch faults parallel to the ridges (fig. 273).

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

Fig. 273- Besides the local en equilibrium tectonic regime, created on the top
of shale diapir, that is to say in absence of a tectonic stress, the extensional
structures associated with mobile shaly substratum are mainly composed by
normal faults (lengthening) striking parallel to 2.
http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

With a negative tectonic stress ( t < 0), the shale movements can produce: (i) shale ridges
parallel to regional 2, (ii) growth faults, (iii) rollovers, (iv) gravity slidings, etc.
With a tectonic stress nil, i.e. in absence of a major tectonic stage, shalokinese can be
very important. It usually it is synchronous of sedimentation and it can control, as the
halokinesis, the facies and the thickness of the sedimentary sequences.
As shalokinesis ( t = 0) is almost always associated with shale ridges, growth faults,
rollovers, etc., that is to say when the tectonic stress ( t) is < 0, we prefer, by commodity, to
study all the shale movements together. However, using the same criterion and singularity
of salt ridges associated with t > 0, this kind of structures will not be studied. Shale
tectonics is the deformation of shale involving no major tectonic stage. Shale tectonics is
similar to salt tectonics (fig. 274).

Fig. 274- Without regional context and in isolation, very often it is quite
difficult to decide if a detachment plane is associated with a salt or shale
interval. This is particularly true when the bottom of the mobile substratum is
not well individualized. This seismic line shows a typical association between
shale and salt movements.

In addition, these two types of tectonics are very often together (Gulf Coast Basin), and it is
not always easy to differentiate salt domes from shale domes. On seismic lines, particularly
at the bottom of mobile substratum, pull-ups and pull-downs can be difficult to recognize.
The chiefly principles of shale tectonics can be summarized as follows:

B.1- Plasticity
http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

The plasticity of shales is mainly due to "undercompaction. Undercompaction can be the


result of: (i) rate of deposition, (ii) burial, (iii) thickness, (iv) absence of evacuation drainage,
etc.

B.2- Undercompaction
Undercompaction produces:
a) a lowering of the density: a 30-40 % decrease compared with the density of
normally compacted shale.
b) a geostatic disequilibrium which results in a vertical and lateral movement of the
undercompacted shale.

Fig. 275- On deep water of several divergent continental margins and


Mediterranean basins shale tectonic, with its characteristics growth faults,
mounds and diapirs, are paramount.

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

Fig. 276- Two well-known areas, the Niger delta and the Gulf of Mexico, can
be considered as typical shale tectonic areas. On this line from Niger delta,
shale diapirs are more than evident.

Fig. 277- On this seismic line, it is easily to recognize that the majority of the
faults are pre-compaction. Indeed, the dip of those fault planes chances with
http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

the compactability of the intervals. i.e., plus compactable is the sedimentary


interval lower is the dip of the fault plane.

The previous seismic line (fig. 277), shot in the Gulf of Mexico, shows the relationship
between the growth faults and the shalokinesis: (i) growth faults, (ii) stretch faults, (iii)
rollovers. These structures are particularly developed in areas where deltaic sand-bodies
prograde over a mobile shale substratum as illustrated in fig 278.

Fig. 288- This cross-section (onshore of Texas) through Agua Dulce #1,
Indian Point #1, Corpus Christs ORPUS #1, Laguna Larga #1, Chevron #1,
Sprint and S. Sprint #1, Carril #1, Superior #1, and Shell wells, shows: (i) the
Anahuac transgression, (ii) the seaward displacement of the sedimentary
environments: continental, shoreline, marine, particularly that of the Frio
formation, (iii) the same upward displacement of the sedimentary
environments is visible in the wells. In the same way, the electrical log of
Indian Point field, illustrated on fig. 289, is very illustrative.

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

Fig. 289 - On this log it is easy to recognize: (i) an upward marine


environment sequence with thin turbidite reservoirs, (ii) a shallow water
environment with coastal sand reservoirs and (iii) continental environment
with fluvial reservoirs. The significant hydrocarbons occurrences are within
the environments with a sand/shale ratio ranging between 15 and 25% (that
cannot be recognized just only this electric log), also, you can believe us but
there are not hydrocarbons in the fluvial sandstones.

A geological interpretation of a seismic line seaward of the cross-section of fig. 288,


is illustrated below (fig. 290).

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

Fig. 290- On this interpretation (seismic line seaward of the cross-section illustrated on
fig. 288, onshore Texas, one can recognize: (i) the displacements of the shorelines
creating a regional regression, (ii) small transgressions intercalated during in the
regional regression, (iii) outbuilding and upbuilding of geometry of the sedimentary
intervals suggested by the different positions of the depositional coastal break (roughly
the coastline during regressive episodes).

On the other hand, fig. 290 depicts the seaward evolution of the shale structures,
i.e. (a) growth faults (without shale in the upthrown block), (b) growth faults with
residual shale in upthrown block, (c) asymmetrical shale domes with a growth fault
seaward and (d) symmetrical shale dome with stretch faults on top of the dome, but
without growth fault. Such an evolution shows shale tectonics (shalokinesis) evolves
in time and space.
The seaward progradation of sedimentary environments and development of
growth faults, associated to shale tectonics, can be translated by "Aggradate ut
progradamus" that is to say upbuilding is required to outbuilding. Let's see what
that means when a deltaic interval prograding over a mobile shaly substratum (fig.
291).

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

Fig. 291- The different steps, or stages, recognized on seismic lines when a
deltaic interval progrades over a mobil substratum are depicted in this sketch
(see text).

The evolution in time and space can be summarized as follows:


(i) During the stage A, in which the thickness of deltaic platform is between
20-150 m, the shoreline (depositional coastal break) progrades over the
shale substratum, the the slope (continental or deltaic) is stable.
(ii) The shoreline and continental sands prograde seaward, at the same time
that proximal turbidites and slope shales are deposited.
(iii) This mechanism creates a sedimentary depocenter which increases
locally the vertical stress l (lithostatic pressure minus pore pressure).
(iv) As 3 is horizontal and perpendicular to the shoreline ( 2), the mobile
substratum starts to flow seaward and upward developing a mound and
creating a compensatory subsidence in the onshore.
(v) The first consequence of the mound developing is the increasing of the
slope angle, which becomes unstable to a certain depth water deposition,
critical depth (HC).
http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

(vi) At that time, the sediments can not prograde because the slope is
unstable, that is, it does not allow deposition.
(vii) Thus, more the substratum flows upward, more thick is the onshore
depocenter and, as the slope is unstable, the sediments arriving to the
shoreline are transported basinward by turbiditic currents, being deposited
when the currents decelerate.
(viii) The result is a turbiditic upbuilding package deposited under a great
water depth water. During this time (stage B), the shoreline (2) does not
change.
(ix) The turbiditic upbuilding package, deposited in the bottom of the slope
induces a new shale flowing which decreases the slope angle. Actually, at
this stage of the tectonic evolution, the main event is the reduction of the
angle of slope which becomes stable.
(x) When the slope angle is stable, the progradation of shoreline and
deposition of continental sands and slope shales is possible (stage C):
"Aggradate ut Progradamus".
(xi) The consequence of this seaward progradation is the displacement of
the shoreline from 2 to 3, and thickening of the onshore (stage D).
(xii) As the evolution continues at a certain time, two big sedimentary
depocenters will be developed landward and seaward of the shale dome.
(xiii) The pressure against the shale dome increases more and more, and the
flanks of the shale dome become steeper.
(xiv) The seaward flank of the dome (due to the orientation of the tectonic
stress 3) becomes unstable and a fault zone starts to develop close to the
top of the dome but in seaward flank (stage E).
(xv) The exaggeration of this instability creates a typical gliding plane
along the flank of the shale dome and a growth fault is developed with a
thickening of the sediments against the fault plane and a slight transgression
displaces the shoreline landward (5). It is the stage F.
Three remarks must be made:
- A shale mobile substratum implies a high pore pressure. The water
pressure reduces the effect of the normal stress on the gliding plane and so
reduces the frictional resistance gliding.
- This mechanism requires a strong terrigeneous influx, and it is the reason
why this kind of structures are frequently associated with river dominated
deltas.
http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

- Proximal turbidites (fig. 292) are developed by the same mechanism, just
the scale and the upbuilding change.

Fig. 293- When the deltaic slope is higher than 3 (the stability of a slope
depends of the water depth), the delta front sandstones can glide seaward
deposition in the toe of the deltaic slope (which in particular cases can
correspond to the continental slope) what petroleum geologist (particular
Shell's geologist) call proximal turbidites. Admittedly, such a deposition
decreases the angle of slope what eventually can allow again s seaward
progradation of the delta.

B.3- Fault displacement


Very often geologist need to assess the fault displacement of the normal faults associate or
not with shale tectonics. Such a displacement can be evaluated by different ways as depicted
in fig. 293.

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

Fig. 293- Different ways geologists have to evaluated normal fault displacement.

We must add the stratigraphic throw, that is to say, the total thickness of missing section
and the "cut-out", i.e. the missing section in an electrical log. When a well is vertical and
the beds horizontal, then olne can say the throw = stratigraphic throw = "cut-out".

B. 4- Fault associated with shale tectonics


There are main to classes:
(a) stretch faults and
(b) growth faults.
The stretch faults, as in salt tectonics, are normally associated to the apex of the shale
domes. The growth faults are associated to the flanks of the domes more than to the top
of the domes. Growth faults are distinguished from other normal faults by comparingthe
thickness of stratigraphic units in the upthrown and downthrown blocks and the fact that
there can be no growth fault outside of an area of sedimentation. Thus, in a genetic, rather
than a descriptive definition, a growth fault is simply a fault that offsets an active surface of
deposition.

B.5- Growth fault displacements


http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

A basic principle of faulting and particularly growth faulting is that the amount of
displacement measured along the fault plane decreases from a maximum to zero in all
directions. In other words, a fault lose displacement. The upper part of a growth fault
system with bed thickening is the part usually considered as growth fault. The lower part of
a growth fault system may show some of the accepted characteristics of growth faults, such
as dip of the beds in the downthrown block back into the fault, but all movement is postdepositional or late in respect to the faulted beds.
The displacement of any expanded stratigraphic unit is the sum of
(1) contemporaneous displacement, and
(2) late displacement,
as illustrated in figs. 294 and 295.

Fig. 294- Here, it is quite evident that the total displacement corresponds to
the contemporaneous displacement, i.e. the expanded stratigraphic section.

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

Fig. 295- Here the total displacement is the sum of the


contemporaneous displacement (difference between A and A') plus
the late displacement (in relation to A-A' movement), i.e. the
thickness different between B an B".

In a growth fault, two sections can be recognized:


a) The pre-growth and pre-kinematic section. The offsetting began after the deposition of the
lowermost bed.
b) The growth section exhibits both contemporaneous movement and post-depositional
movement on all beds but the upper one.

The displacement of a growth fault expands a stratigraphic unit, so the hangingwall is


thicker than the footwall. The movement of the fault creates more "room" (accommodation
or space available for sedimentation) for deposition in downthrown side, as illustrated in
fig. 296.

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

Fig. 296- When a fault is active during deposition, it means that the
downthrown block, rotates, and the fault plane becomes less and less steep
with depth, due to a volume problem.

B. 6- Growth faults and traps


The best single reason for the importance of growth fault structures in petroleum geology
is the contemporaneous deposition and faulting. Indeed, the continuation of the system
forms a structural trap almost immediately (fig. 297). Regardless of when the oil forms or
migrates, an early formed trap is there to catch it. Growth faults also may increase and even
improve reservoirs in downthrown block, particularly limestone reservoirs.

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

Fig. 297- In a growth fault there are two different closures: (i) parallel to the
fault strike (Axis A) and (ii) perpendicular to the fault strike (Axis B).

(i) Closure parallel to the strike of the fault


The strike closure can be induced by:
1) The inital curved (concave upward) fault plane. Indeed, the
vertical displacement changes laterally, being maximal, generally,
in the central part of the fault.
2) Posterior deformation of the initial fault plane.
The word plane in fault plane conveys the idea that a plane exists. In
reality the plane is the "nothing" between two surfaces formed at the
time of dislocation. Seismically speaking, generally a fault plane is not
emphasized by a reflector. It is characterized by a seismic surface defined
by reflections terminations, as illustrated in fig. 296. Growth faults are
particularly susceptible to two post faulting deformation: (a) compaction
(fig. 297) and (b) late deformation, which implies a rotation of one of the
blocks (fig. 298)

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

Fig. 297- The dip of a pre-compaction fault changes with the lithology. Higher
is the dip of the fault less compactable is the juxtaposed sedimentary interval
on the footwall (upthrown block).

Fig. 298- On this line, the fault in red is precompaction as suggested by the
changes in the dip of the fault with the lithology. On contrary, the faults in
blue are posterior. They do not correspond to really normal extensional faults,
http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

but to plane discontinuities between rotated blocks (splintering or "horsetail"


of the fault).

(ii) Closure perpendicular to the fault strike.


The continuous and post-depositional movement along a fault plane
produces a "rollover" closure due to the "potential void ". All planes
of growth faults have less dip at depth than at the surface. Therefore, a
concave-upward geometry is developed and the its mapping of shows a
spoon geometry rather than a rectilinear geometry. Another particularity of
growth faults, as well as of all normal faults, is the impossibity of determine
the tectonic "cut-out" in wells by lack of reference (fig. 299).

Fig. 299- As depicted, it is impossible with the well results to determine the
cut-out. However, a combination of seismic and subsurface data can correctly
approach the intercal not recognized in the normal faults.
press here

next

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement

Send E-mail to ccramez@compuserve.com or cramez@ufp.pt with questions and comments about these notes.
Copyright 2001 CCramez
Last update: March, 2006

http://homepage.ufp.pt/biblioteca/WebBasPrinTectonics/BasPrincTectonics/Page9.htm#FaultDisplacement