You are on page 1of 4


1. Speroff.L;






Endocrinology & Infertility,Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 7th Edition,
2. Collins JA, Evidance based infertility : Evaluation of the female








Proceeding of the 28th wold congress of fertility and sterlity, Canada,
3. Anwar INC, Seleksi Pasien Menuju Fertilisasi In Vitro. Fertilisasi In
Vitro Dalam Praktek Klinik. Cetakan I, 2006, Jakarta. hal.1-38
4. Bayer SR, Alper MM, Penzias AS. The Boston IVF. Handbook og
infertility the Parthenon publishing group. Boca Racon, Washington
5. Larson,U. Research on infertility: Which defenition should we use.
Fertile. Steril. 2005;83:846-52
6. Gazuani MR, Ozturk O, Templeton A. Care of the infertile couple in:
Reproductive medicine in the twenty first century proceeding of the
17th world congress on fertility and sterility,Melbourne,Australia, The
Parthenon publising group. Boca Raton, Washington DC,2002:107.
7. Olmedo, SB. Defenition and causes of infertility. Reproductive bio
medicine online. 2000; 2:41-53
8. Edward RC, Boody SA. Principle and practice of assisted human
reproduction. WB Sanders company. Philadelphia-Tokyo.1995
9. Van Der Spuy ZM, Albert PJ. Ovarian Reserve: Reproductive
medicine in the Twenty First Century, Proceeding of the 17th world
Universitas Sumatera Utara

Washington 10. 1998 : 69:505-10. Age Related Changes Of The Population Of Human Ovarian Follicles: Increase in The Disappearerence Rate non Glowing And Early Growing Follicles in Aging Woman. Frattarelli J. Velde ER. Fertility and Sterility.congress of Fertility and Sterility.50: 653-63 12. Pretreatment transvaginal ultrasound examination predicts ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophins in in-vitro fertilization. Tomas C. 1994. Infertility: Etiology And Evaluation. Mellows HJ. hal. 2002. et al. Hargreave TB. Bearson. Martikarinen H. Huttunen S. Boca Raton. L.Human Reproduction. Comliare FH. Rowe PJ. Jakarta. Halim B. The Variability Of Female Reproductive Ageing Hum Reprod Update. PL. Adnin I. Kovacs GT. et al: Use of antral follicle count to predicts the outcome of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Prognostic use of mean ovarian volume in invitro fertilization cycles: a prospective assement. 14. 84-77. Ecuchard R. Mc Lanchland R. Cambridge University Press. 1993 13. 8:141-54 11. Gourgeon A. Jacksonville Medicine. Rodrigue Armas O. 2006. Anwar INC. leds Healy DL. WHO Manual for the Standart Investigation and Diagnosis of the Infertile Couple. Cetakan I. Bio Reprod. 15. Thalabard JC. 1997: 12:220-3 16. Chang M. 2000:1-10 17.F. Penilaian Fungsi Ovarium. Fertility and 56    Universitas Sumatera Utara .Y. The Parthenon Publishing Group. Lisa A. Fertilisasi Invitro dalam Praktek Klinik.

Chicago. 2004:81:1478-85 22.V. 83:291301 57    Universitas Sumatera Utara . Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian respons and pregnancy after IVF: A meta analysis and comparison with basal FSH level. Early Ovarian Aging: a hypothesis. Frattarelli J. 2005:83:811-4 20. et al.USA. Ovarian Volume and Ovarian Reserve. Seifer D. Sharara F.sterility . USA. Nicolau D. et al. Antral follicular count as a predictor of ovarian response in induction of ovulation in patients with anovulatory infertility. oktober 2004:82:811-5 18. The antral follicle count is a better marker than basal follicle-stimulating hormone for the selection of older patients with acceptable pregnancy prospects after in vitro fertilization. Scott R.I. Reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Fertility and Sterility. 1998:804-12 21. Available at: Http:www// advancedfertility. September 2000:3:512-7 19.Thornton K. Hum reprod 2003: 18: 1137-9 25. detection and clinical relevance.E and Mouselhy M.Resting follicles. Ilse A. Klinkert.B The detection of diminished ovarian reserve in infertile woman.Fertility and Sterility.L. 2003:6:35-40 23. High follicle-stimulating hormone levels should not necessarily lead to the exclusion of subfertile patients from treatment. Metawie M. Fertility and Sterility. Hendrics DJ . Wald T.Med. USA. Fertility and sterility. Templeton A.T. et al. Basal antral follicle number and mean ovarian diameter predict cycle cancellation and ovarian responsiveness in assisted reproductive technology cycles.A. 2007:16:178-88 24. Landes bioscience. Assisted Reproductive Technology. AJOG Reviews. Advanced Fertility Center Of Chicago. Antral Follicle 26. 2005. J.Journal.Suez Canal Univ. et al. USA.

2000. et al. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. USA September 2003:80:577-83 32.J. et al.M.J. Van Rooij I. Wahyuni AS. 390-405 29. 2007.A. In proceeding 4th world congress on ovulation induction 2004: from an ovulation to assisted reproduction hds. 79: 482-8 28. Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. RCOG Press. Clinical Guideline (ED Moody J). 624-7 35.L. A new marker of the ovarian and follicular status. et al. Franchin R. Gynaecology Illustrated. National collaborating centere of womens and childrens healthy. Italy. 440-58 31. 2003:79:1091-100 34. Obstet Gyneco. Hansen K. Edmonds D. Statistika kedokteran. Woman olders than 40 years of age and those with elevated FSH levels ffer poor response rate and embryo quality in IVF. Fertility and Sterility.. 33.R. Antimullerian hormon (AMH). Bamboedoea communication. Age and the ovarian follicle pool assessed with transvaginal ultrasonography. Fertility and sterility. Reproductive aging and variability in the ovarian antral follicle count: application in the clinical setting.F.Infertility. Norman Jane. Jakarta 30.M.Keith. Reuss M. Ama J. Fertility assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems.1996: 174.5th Edition. et al.L. 2004.27. Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 7th Edition: Infertility. Fertility and Sterility. Churchill Livingstone. 58    Universitas Sumatera Utara . Bancsi. 2003. Fichori M Bologna.