This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
repeated this in all the Apparitions as if forewarning us that in these times o f diabolical disorientation, we must not let ourselves be deceived by false doct rines that diminish the elevation of our soul to God by means of prayer. …the diabolical disorientation …is invading the world and deceiving souls! It is necessary to confront it … It is painful to see such a great disorientation, and in so many persons who occ upy places of responsibility! … the devil has succeeded in infiltrating evil und er the guise of good, and they act as the blind leading the blind, as Our Lord t ells us in His gospel; and souls are letting themselves be deceived. Voluntarily I sacrifice myself and offer my life to God, for peace in His Church , for priests and for all consecrated souls, above all for those who carry on so erroneously and so deceived!” Sister Lucy of Fatima WHAT IS DIABOLICAL DISORIENTATION? According to the Oxford Advanced Learner’s dictionary, “diabolical” means “evil and wicked; like a devil.” While to “disorientate” or “disorient” is “to make so mebody unable to recognize where they are or where they should go; to make someb ody feel confused.” Putting these two words together, diabolical disorientation could be defined as a devilish or an evil and wicked confusion. Simply put, it i s a confusion that is masterminded by the devil. Take for example a situation wh ere a power failure suddenly occurs in the night and you find it impossible to k now the direction to move for the next few seconds or longer. Another example is the kind of experience one undergoes at times when one wakes up and then there is a momentary loss of knowledge of where the door is or what one is sleeping on or in what part of the world that one is or even what day it is. These are kind s of disorientation but there is a fundamental difference between them and the t opic of this article apart from the latter being from lucifer and other reasons. This difference is that in many cases the victim has no idea of being disorient ed and this makes diabolical disorientation the more diabolical. The question th at now arises is, “How can one know that one is diabolically disoriented?” The a im of this article is to point out certain instances of diabolical disorientatio n in our time and the ultimate solution to it for the edification of readers and for the greater glory of GOD. Pope Saint Gregory the Great said that it is bett er that scandals arise than that the truth be suppressed; hence no matter whose ox is gored, this article will tell the truth, “And you shall know the truth: an d the truth shall make you free.” (John VIII: 32, Douay-Rheims) INSTANCES OF DIABOLICAL DISORIENTATION IMMODEST DRESSING Immodesty in dress is a typical instance of diabolical disorientation in our tim e. Before 1917, modesty in fashion was second nature to Catholic women. It was v irtually inconceivable to anyone then (except the agents of satan of course) tha t a time like ours will ever come when public nudity will be considered a “virtu e”. According to the book, Immodest Dress: The Mind of the Church: With regard to the Church s Standards, bear in mind that as recently as the 19th century and early 20th century, women were wearing their dresses near or down t o their ankles, and their sleeves were generally 3/4 length or down to their wri sts: During the 1860 s women wore full length hoop skirts. By 1870 skirts were s till full length but had narrowed. The dress of the 1880 s had a bustle that mad e the full length skirts full in back. Around 1910 women wore "hobble skirts"--full length skirts that were narrow at the ankles. In the 1920 s came the "flapp er style." These were straight line short dresses, usually sleeveless, that ende
d at, or above, the knee. That was the beginning of the present trend! From that time on women s fashions have come to reveal more and more of the body.1 Our Lady of Fatima being the solicitous and decent Mother that She is, gave us t he privilege of a warning through Blessed Jacinta Marto before the fashion world went haywire that “certain fashions will be introduced which will offend our di vine LORD very much” but Her warning went unheeded. Today, the diabolical disori entation of lucifer as regards fashion just as in other instances has succeeded largely not because he is so formidable but because among other reasons, we are not fighting back. But what makes a dress modest or immodest, decent or indecent ? This question is a sine qua non for determining if one is diabolically disorie nted about fashion and to what extent. In the first place, decency begins from t he inside and not from the outside because it is “Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man: but what cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man” (Ma tthew XV: 11, Douay-Rheims). One has to have a certain mindset interiorly before proceeding to the exterior. This interior mindset is that of the purest of all creatures, Blessed Virgin Mary, Immaculate Conception, Queen of queens and Mothe r of GOD. This is because a good tree does not bear bad fruit and She bore the b est fruit of all time, the MAN-GOD, JESUS CHRIST of Nazareth and She still bears that fruit in the hearts of all who open to Her. Having laid this foundation wh ich cannot be shaken by any natural or supernatural disaster, one can now proceed to the exterior part of mo desty. After 1917 with the program of corruption of fashion in full swing, the C hurch found it imperative to formally define, though it always was in her consci ousness and understanding from time immemorial that: In order that uniformity of understanding prevail… we recall that a dress cannot be called decent which is cut deeper than two fingers breadth under the pit of the throat, which does not cover the arms at least to the elbows and scarcely r eaches a bit beyond the knees. Furthermore, dresses of transparent materials are improper2 This has always been the truth and the position of the Church from the time of J ESUS CHRIST and it has neither changed nor will it ever change, irrespective of what anyone might think, say or do. It is just as the union of Marriage was alwa ys meant for one man and one woman in spite of the polygamous nature of the marr iages of some of the patriarchs. Similarly, the Assumption of Mary, body and sou l into Heaven is a historical event that actually took place in time and it has always been true and has never changed even though it was only dogmatically proc laimed by Pius XII more than a millennium and a half later.3 Ultimately, a decen t or modest dress covers the shoulders, cleavage, breasts, armpits, elbows, back , belly and knees completely at all times and in all the postures of the female body without accentuating the figure especially the curves; and it is neither ti ght nor transparent as to reveal the skin in these aforementioned areas of the b ody or the undergarments. Needless to say, it is an abomination for a woman to w ear trousers, no matter what popular opinion may be. So then, now that it is kno wn what a decent dress is, how many women’s dresses seen these days meet the req uired standards? They are very few, if any. Even the habits of many female relig ious are not decent. As a matter of fact, things are so bad that it will not be surprising to see them in trousers! So there we have it, the diabolical disorie ntation in dress. Many of us do not even know because we are diabolically disori ented, that there is an unchangeable dress code for Catholic women and that this code ought to be abided by. But do we really think that Mary would wear trouser s or sleeveless or any indecent attire or condescend to the “shameless parade of the flesh” in any way if She was born in let us say 1990? It seems we have no i dea who She is. CATHOLIC AND NON-CATHOLIC PRACTICES Another instance of diabolical disorientation is in our practices. Catholicism i s not a trend but an immutable way of life with a solid and authentic theologica
l bearing. It is not some vogue that comes and goes, becomes old fashioned, gets updated, and so on. However, the diabolical disorientation created by satan has reversed this notion for many of us. Even though the heresies and errors partic ularly modernism, indifferentism, liberalism, “ecumenism” and all the other isms against the Catholic Faith have been around for quite some time, they were offi cially institutionalized on the heels of the Second Vatican Council. Vatican II unlike previous councils which had the purging effect of exorcisms has left the Church badly in need of an exorcism! This Council has been termed the Third Wor ld War by the Athanasius of the twentieth century, the Bishop Sarto and beacon o f Catholicism in the post-conciliar era, the indefatigable founder of the Priest ly Fraternity of Saint Pius X (SSPX), Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre of blessed memo ry, Marcel the Great. This Council, which will be eventually annulled like the Second Council of Ephesus was annulled by Pope Saint Leo the Great, actually sta rted out as a council but degenerated into a revolution. This is obvious if one considers that in spite of the fact that the preparation for the Council was one of the most meticulous in the Church’s history as it “was carried out very cons cientiously and with a concern for perfection” by the Council’s Central Preparat ory Commission of which Marcel the Great himself was an active member, all the C ommission’s impeccable seventy-two schemata were “condemned to the wastepaper ba sket” only a fortnight after the opening of the Council4. This Council took only three years (October 11, 1962-December 8, 1965) but the documents allegedly pro mulgating it are the most voluminous of those of the twenty-one ecumenical Counc ils in the Church’s history, much more than those of the Council of Trent (15451583), which is the longest in the history of the Church. Incredibly, unlike tho se of the previous twenty ecumenical Councils, they neither condemned any heresy , refuted any error, excommunicated any heretic nor anathemized any propagator o f error in spite of the fact that eleven years before the Council started, Pope Pius XII lamented in his encyclical Evangelii Praecones (June 2, 1951) that the world was in a worse state than it was before the Deluge; not to mention that Sa int Pius X, the only twentieth century Pope to be canonized in the twentieth cen tury, in his first encyclical E Supremi barely three months after ascending to t he papacy as far back as in 1903 thought that the anti-christ may have already c ome. Moreover, the mass murderers Stalin and Lenin in the name of Communism had killed more people than the First and Second World Wars combined; Mao Tse-tung i n the name of the same pandemic had launched a cruel persecution of the Chinese people and of the Catholic Church that has continued till date and which has inc luded various killing sprees (like the 1989 Tiananmen square massacre in which a t least 10,000 unarmed peaceful protesters were brutally machine gunned down in cold blood and trampled on by armoured tanks) forcing Catholics loyal to the Chu rch and to the Pope to go underground (even to this day, although the pathetic e xcuse we have for the media will never tell you that) and brutally suppressing t he Church in favour of the treacherous Communist government–run Chinese Catholi c Patriotic Association (CCPA which also exists till date and continues to dupe unsuspecting Catholics outside China to interact with them and to give them don ations); and allegedly, a nuclear war nearly broke out between the USA and Russi a in the same month that the Council started!!! Yet, not even one condemnation c ame from Vatican II!!! (Not even against the stupendously abominable Teilhard de Chardin!!!) Indeed the Second Vatican Revolution marked the beginning of an era - an unprecedented era of institutionalized error and scandal: the era of the G reat Apostasy!!! But how long will it take and how much more havoc will be wreak ed before Vatican II will be finally annulled? Many Catholics today do not know that along with Ash Wednesday and Good Friday, every Friday of the year is a day of abstinence except holy days of obligation. What about horoscopes? They are p agan, superstitious and are forbidden by the Church and by the first Commandment but it is very common to see Catholics checking out their “star signs” to see w hat it has for them for a particular day or month or year or even for their enti re life time. Horoscopes are a complete denial of GOD and HIS providence but why do we embrace them? We are diabolically disorientated. What about contraception and birth control? Catholics are in the forefront of a worldwide adoption of co ndoms, pills, IUDs, “Natural” Family Planning (NFP) like billings, sympto-therma
l, creighton, mucus, rhythm, etc., and other obnoxious contraceptions because am ong other reasons, we are diabolically disoriented - Freemasons want to depopula te the world and control its population and Catholics are endorsing their satani c program! Accepting sufferings, illnesses, disappointments, setbacks, etc., as crosses and means of expiating our sins has become virtually extinct. Many of us have forgotten about Purgatory and indulgences! How many of us still have Masse s offered for dead relatives, friends and the souls in Purgatory? We are too bus y shedding tears and “giving them befitting burials”. Cohabitation is now popula r culture as men and women fornicate with impunity, abort at will and accept the children they want to. At their own convenience, they will request for a high s ociety “blessed marriage”. Catholics even view customary marriage as an alternat ive to the Sacrament of Matrimony. In fact, the diabolical disorientation has ma de many of us to see our Faith as compatible with pagan practices so that we can always set it aside to offer pagan sacrifices, procure charms and observe some ridiculous customary foolery or superstitious belief. We even believe in reincar nation! For goodness sake, JESUS CHRIST would have been the first to reincarnate if there was such a thing. How many Catholics know how to make the sign of the cross? How many Catholics frequently recommend themselves to their guardian ange ls and patron saints let alone emulate them? How many even know that there is su ch a thing as a patron or a guardian? Participation in non-Catholic worship is a sin against Faith and against the first Commandment, yet how many of us refrain from non-Catholic worship? How many of us know that it is wrong to turn our bac ks on the BLESSED SACRAMENT or to converse idly in church in HIS presence? Catho lics now sit down during consecration and the distribution of HOLY COMMUNION! Ho w many Catholics pray their Rosary daily? How many strive to receive COMMUNION d aily and to go to confession on a regular basis? Yet we brush our teeth, bathe o urselves and clean our environment regularly but we neglect our souls to our rui n. How many Catholics make provision for chapels and grottos when setting up the ir homes or renting accommodations? How many of us even have altars in our homes ? How many Catholics know that Santa Claus is actually Saint Nicholas of Bari? H ow many Catholics know that it is simony for a priest to accept more than one st ipend and one intention for one Mass? How many Catholics know that holy water wa shes away venial sin? How many Catholics wear sacramentals? They are now meant f or babies and toddlers who later dump them for the world and its false maxims li ke their parents as soon as they grow “wiser”. How many of us know that the wear ing of Saint Benedict’s medal protects the wearer from poisons of all kinds and demonic attacks? To cut to the chase, let us recall a very popular announcement that is usually made before COMMUNION in Masses: “HOLY COMMUNION is meant for ba ptized and practising Catholics who are in the state of grace.” So, how many of us try to be just that? That depends on how many of us who survive the diabolica l disorientation. ORIENTATION AND MENTALITY The mentality of the Church has also been diabolically disoriented. At this poin t it is difficult to know where to start from, what to mention and what to leave out. It must be pointed out still that this article will not cover all the inst ances of diabolical disorientation in our time but may the LORD use the little t hat will be written about to recover HIS lost sheep. In the past, the Church led the world but nowadays, it is the world that dictates to the Church. Thanks to the Second Vatican Revolution. It has led to all kinds of “dialogues” between th e Church and the world among other abnormalities, as against our LORD’S command to “teach” (Matthew XXVIII: 19, Douay-Rheims). Our present day secondary or high school system of education was originated by Saint John Baptist de la Salle thr ough his Brothers of the Christian School. The earliest known encyclopaedia, Ety mologiae was written by Saint Isidore of Seville! The oldest army in the world i s the papal army! The most thorough investigative process in the world is the ca nonization process!! The true shape of the world was first disclosed by Saint Vi rgilius, Archbishop of Salzburg (700-784) and not Ferdinand Magellan (1480?-1521 ) as has been erroneously taught!!! The most sublime profession in the world is the Catholic priesthood!!! Many cities and settlements in Europe were begun by C
atholics who practised charity or sought solitude in deserts, forests and away f rom society, and GOD through their sanctity attracted others there. What could t he world have done without the Church? We created the model for what NGOs are do ing today but guess who’s running the charity scene presently? We wrote and comp iled the Bible; we created the calendar; we abolished slavery; we laid the found ation for philosophy, theology, genetics, English language, education, learning, classical music, arts, poetry, literature, architecture, government, jury syste m, healthcare system, rehabilitation of character, philanthropy, civilization: w e ran the world, we run the world!!! The list goes on and on but unfortunately, the orientation is quite different these days. The Church no longer leads like b efore but now looks up to the world. This has led to negative socialization with in the Church. Commercial and social events like “Harvest” and “Thanksgiving” wh ich are not even in the New Missal have been unofficially “liturgized” throughou t the Church. We celebrate the world’s New Year with enthusiasm but neglect that of the Church in Advent. The Sacraments particularly Matrimony have been reduce d to being treated like mere social ceremonies. Nowadays, this Sacrament is “inc omplete” if the priest fails to mandate the groom to kiss the bride. The Church has been invaded by the world. Our schools now teach evolution; they have become tragic shadows of their former glorious selves: cesspools of error and impurity . These are the characteristic fruits of the opening of the Church to the world in line with the post-conciliar “renewal” of Vatican II. Traditional Catholics will help a great deal if they stopped giving credence to any of its documents b y not quoting them in their speeches and writings. But what could one have expec ted when the Council’s periti included some of the worst heretics of all time li ke Hans Küng, Dominique Chenu, Yves Congar, Karl Rhaner, Edward Schillebeeckx, E douard Dhanis, etc., who would have been probable candidates for the stake if t he Inquisition was still in effect? Imagine such diseased opinions like “the Vir gin Birth is not true”, “Catholic dogma is not immutable”, “the Church evolves”, “the Resurrection is a myth”, etc, coming from men who are supposed to be pries ts and theologians. What a diabolically disoriented scenario we are in. Christia nity has been degraded from Catholicism to a hodge podge of brand names; Sunday, from a holy day of obligation to a day of entertainment, sports and social gath erings; the Holy Land, from a pilgrimage site to a mere tourist attraction. “Chi ld Dedication” is now more prestigious than the Sacrament of Baptism!!! Catholic s now substitute prayer with noisemaking. We have copied “Praise the LORD”! “All eluia!” and other foreign practices from the Pentecostal Religion. How many of u s know that the word “pastor” really means a parish priest and not some Pentecos tal administrator. Besides, it is forbidden for a pastor or any person lower tha n the Pope to impose tithes.5 Let us turn our attention to Christmas for a while . Contrary to what the world thinks, December 25, the Feast of the Nativity of our LORD or Christmas day is the beginning and not the end of Christmas season, after due preparation in the four preceding weeks via Advent. The season of Chr istmas does not end on December 25 but on the 2nd of February with the Feast of Purification of Blessed Virgin Mary (Presentation of our LORD)! However, the for mer erroneous notion about Christmas has diffused from the world into the Church . Hence Christmas Carols and “Nine Lessons” are sung with disgusting impunity du ring Advent. Catholics wish one another “Merry Christmas” and decorate their hom es and churches during Advent instead of preparing for Christmas. This has virtu ally eliminated the season of Advent and has contributed greatly to the error of regarding the Solemnity of Nativity of our LORD as a mere materialistic jambore e. What about December 26? It is the Feast of St. Stephen, the first martyr afte r the Resurrection of CHRIST and not “Boxing day”. There is no such thing as “Bo xing day” in the Liturgical calendar. It is merely a social observance, yet many Catholics prefer this to the Feast of St. Stephen. As for the unfortunate Feast day of St. Valentine, we have not only forgotten the Saint and his legacy but h ave joined the world in turning the day into a period of celebrating error, vani ty, impurity, foolery and misdirected affections. Saint Valentine was a priest a nd a martyr but unfortunately, our commemoration of his Feast day has little or nothing to do with either the priesthood or martyrdom. What a diabolical mess we are in!
MISREPRESENTATION IN SACRED IMAGES, PICTURES AND ART A more subtle diabolical disorientation is the way in which sacred images, pictu res and works of art are represented and presented. Let us begin with the crucif ix. JESUS CHRIST died on a cross, which had an inscription, “Jesus of Nazareth K ing of the Jews” (“INRI”) on it, with HIS Head bowed to the right and HIS right Foot nailed on HIS left Foot. In addition, HE was covered with Blood and Wounds; and HIS right Side was pierced. Compare this with the crucifixes available toda y and you will find that the agonizing crucifix of the Precious Blood Devotion g iven by our LORD to Barnabas Nwoye on the fifth of January in 2000 A.D. at Olo i n Nigeria truly represents the crucified CHRIST. For the record, it was used as a reference by Mel Gibson in creating the one movie that was anywhere close to t he true nature of the Passion of our LORD, the most popular man ever, the MAN WH O is so great that dates are centred on HIM (B.C. - Before CHRIST and A.D. - Ann o DOMINI or Year of the LORD), the MAN with the longest dynasty ever: from Adam to Pope Benedict XVI and counting!!! Does its mild accuracy not explain its unpr ecedented edification of lives unlike previous versions like the Robert Powell-l ed cast where our LORD is virtually bloodless during his Passion and even carrie d no cross? Does it not also explain the antagonism it generated like The Da Vin ci Code reprisal, among others? Indeed nobody can fight against GOD. Isn’t it am azing that after years of being bombarded with the filth from Hollywood and worl d society as a whole, a film about a MAN WHOSE kingship and authority has been c ontinually denied and derided could cause such a stir? Let it be noted however t hat before, during or after the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Hollywo od, entertainment, show business, mass media and indeed all the agents of social ization will be retaken over or replaced by Traditional Catholicism - brace your selves! Back from our digression; a look at the crucifixes we have today on alta rs, chaplets, books, pictures, bibles, movies, TV and everywhere reveals cruci fixes with no inscriptions, “IKRI”, JESUS CHRIST looking upwards or to the left, his two Feet separated, no Blood, no pierced Side, no Wounds and all kinds of m isrepresentation. What about altars where the statue of Mary is placed on the le ft of the altar and of the crucifix instead of on the right? What about miraculo us medals with the Immaculate Heart on the left-hand of the SACRED HEART instead of on the right-hand? What about the true representation of the SACRED HEART an d the Immaculate Heart? The SACRED HEART of JESUS has fire on the HEART with a c ross in the midst of the fire and a crown of thorns surrounds and pierces the HE ART causing Blood to drip from the HEART. The Immaculate Heart of Mary also has fire on the Heart but the Heart is surrounded by a crown of flowers and is pierc ed through by a sword with blood dripping from the wound. These representations however are limited to when only the Immaculate Heart represents Mary and when t he SACRED HEART alone represents JESUS. Other than this, the picture is incomple te, a misrepresentation or both. What about pictures of the Stations of the Cros s with JESUS CHRIST not having a single drop of Blood? Was it not with HIS Preci ous Blood that HE purchased our salvation? So why is it being de-emphasized in t he representation of HIS Passion? Back to the real crucified CHRIST. Is it not d isturbing that after 2000 years, it is only a minority that has true crucifixes and know what they should even look like? What is more disturbing is that a Card inal like His Eminence Olubunmi Okogie of Lagos Archdiocese is not comfortable w ith the agonizing crucifix. What could his “reservations” be? Is it the bloodine ss? Whatever they are, it still does not justify how a Cardinal who has been in the priesthood for over four decades can have “reservations” about the truth. Wh at a sad story! Another instance of diabolical disorientation which is utterly d espicable and totally unacceptable is in pictures and artworks of Our Lady bare breasted, suckling the BABY JESUS!!! What is even worse is that they are found i n Catholic shops and as decorations in churches!!! The doubting Thomases should check out the entrance door facing the altar of St. Paul’s along Douglas road in Owerri Archdiocese, but “blessed are they that have not seen and have believed” . SEXUALITY
The diabolical disorientation has pervaded all aspects of our lives including se xuality and especially sexuality. Our Lady made it known that the sins that lead most souls to Hell are the sins of the flesh and this was in 1917, before the a dvent of mainstream pornography and the Free “Love” Revolution. Nowadays, homose xuality is considered a natural attribute of humans like race and blood group. P eople now castigate the Pope with impunity if he dares to admonish sodomites and lesbians in public. Even the scandalous and shameless Carrie Prejean, 2009 Cali fornia Public Nudity Queen, was nearly dethroned for saying that marriage should be between a man and a woman. The same sin that compelled GOD to destroy Sodom and Gomorrha has been institutionalized in our time. It might as well be conside red natural for one to be a cannibal, terrorist, suicide bomber, abortionist or a serial killer. After all, homosexuality and murder are among the four sins cry ing to GOD for vengeance, together with oppression of the poor and defrauding wo rkers of their wages. Even animals do not condescend to homosexuality and yet, w e are supposed to have dominion over them! What an irony. Also, these days the l ast thing on our minds when we say “love” is GOD; first thing, lust; others, inf atuation, obsession, sexual attraction, crush, titillation, anything in that lin e but certainly not GOD. No, that is so way back: outdated, obsolete, Dark Ages. Adultery has been “baptized” and is now “having an affair”. It is no longer a m ortal sin but a mere societal peccadillo! What about fornication? Ah! The infamo us fornication! It is now mistaken for sex and has become the definitive basis o f relationships between men and women, men and men, women and women. Children ar e being corrupted and diabolically disoriented right in the womb, through the ve ry blood that flows in the veins of their parents. Prospective couples do not co urt anymore. Impurity especially fornication has overrun the relationship landsc ape with all sorts of nicknames like dating, going out, fling, one-night stand, ménage à trios, player, kuger, pimping, falling in and out of love, etc. The wor ds “fiancée” and “fiancé” are fast becoming vanishing dots in the distant horizo n of history. The byword these days is fornicating-partners aka boyfriend-and-gi rlfriend. “Husband and Wife” has given way to “Baby-mama” and “Baby-father”. Par ents are very proud to point out their daughters’ boyfriends and their sons’ gir lfriends. What a shameless explosion of abominations! Basically, sexuality tod ay has been erroneously pigeonholed into heterosexuality, homosexuality and bise xuality. In other words, if you are male/female, you must have another male/fema le or more that you fornicate with; otherwise you are impotent, uncivilized, rel igious, abnormal, “born-again”, a priest, a bishop, a religious or a hopeless mi sfit. Where do all these leave us? In a vicious quagmire: an unprecedented crisi s of morality and virtues. A crisis that is worse than the recent global meltdow n and all the economic crises before 2009 put together. This crisis ensures that the prince of the world is dragging more and more souls to Hell in staggering f igures. Not even the AIDS pandemic has deterred us from the obstinate worship of impurity. Unfortunately, in the midst of all these catastrophes, some of us are still more interested in global warming and endangered species than in the salv ation of their souls! Who can guess the number of souls that go to Hell every ye ar? During the Fatima Apparitions, Mary was so sad that She never smiled to the children in spite of their tender ages (Lucy was ten at the time, Blessed Franci sco was nine and Blessed Jacinta, seven). According to Her, many souls were goin g to Hell because they had no one to pray and to make sacrifices for them. Yet, this was in 1917 when it was still Tridentine everywhere and decades before the Free “Love” Revolution, MTV, “Sex” Education in Catholic Schools, public nudity gatherings (beach gatherings, pool parties, pool gatherings, etc.), disguised pr ostitution or Miss I hate JESUS and Mary (Miss World, Miss Universe, Miss Fitnes s, Face of Africa and other public nudity pageantries); before the satanic rule of Communism in China forced parents to have only one child even if they had to abort the rest; and decades before the number of abortions committed annually wo rld wide exceeded fifty million in the 1980s!!! If the souls that went to Hell w ere so much then that Our Lady could not manage even a smile to mere children, h ow much more in our so-called jet or silicon or cyber or whatever age. An age th at is darker than the Dark Ages in spite of our technological advancement and al l that. An age where a psycho like Josef (what an insult to Saint Joseph) Fritzl
will hold his daughter captive for decades, torture and rape and impregnate her several times. An age that is so depraved that when Our Lady of Quito showed a vision of it to Mother Mariana de JESUS Torres (1563-1635) in 1582, she fell dea d and had to be resurrected two days later!!! Among the horrors that this privil eged soul was shown was the scarcity of virgin souls that will plague our times. There is currently an unprecedented scarcity of virgin souls as virginity has b een reduced to mere anatomical abstinence from sexual intercourse. Christians ha ve forgotten that all true virgins are modelled after the Holy Family of Virgins , where the father, Joseph; Wife and Mother, Mary; and SON, JESUS were all Virgi ns. Mary is the Queen of Virgins, JESUS is VIRGINITY personified and Joseph is a paragon of chastity but we seem to have forgotten all that. We have forgotten t hat an ex-prostitute like Saint Mary Magdalen is ranked among the virgins in Hea ven because virginity is not just about physically abstaining from sexual interc ourse alone, but also keeping the soul pure. Nowadays virgins are just males and females waiting for the opportunity to fornicate physically; meanwhile they lus t, watch and read pornography, engage in indecency, and indulge in all manner of impure acts and conversations. They are not virgins. They are just anatomically unpenetrated and diabolically disoriented: “…like to whited sepulchres, which o utwardly appear to men beautiful but within are full of dead men’s bones and of all filthiness.” (Matthew XXIII: 27, Douay-Rheims) Their version of virginity is straight out of the pit of Hell, designed, tested and approved by satan and his demons. MULTIPLICITY OF THE BIBLE The diabolical disorientation is also evident in the multiplicity of the most po pular and best selling book ever, the Bible. This is evidenced by the many outra geous “Catholic Bibles” now available like Good News and Jerusalem. The only Bib le solemnly canonized by the Church is Douay-Rheims. This Bible uses the Vulgate , which was produced by Saint Jerome and it is the one approved by the 19th ecum enical council of the Catholic Church, the Council of Trent (1545-1563) to be “h eld as authentic; and that no one is to dare, or presume to reject it under any pretext whatever”6; therefore any other Bible using this Vulgate is also accurat e. All other non-Catholic Bibles that do not even contain the seven other books (Tobias, Judith, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Sirach, 1 and 2 Machabees) which have b een erroneously referred to as “deuterocanonical” (apocryphal) in the post-conci liar Church are eliminated as a matter of course. But what about other “Catholic Bibles”, specifically those printed after the Second Vatican Revolution? What c ould be possibly wrong with them? Well then, let us compare the Douay-Rheims to the very popular Good News. First of all, the misleading Good News unlike Douay -Rheims falsely separates the seven books mentioned above from the other thirtynine books under the erroneous category of “deuterocanonical” or apocrypha, impl ying that they are “worthy of at least private reading, though they are not rega rded as a basis for doctrine”. The entire forty-six books were all officially ap proved by the Synod of Rome (382); the Councils of Hippo (393) and Carthage (397 ) and Pope Saint Boniface I. They were all also canonized by the Council of Tren t without any distinction between apocryphal or non-apocryphal but Good News see ms to know better than all these Synods, Councils and Saint Boniface I thereby s upporting the arch-heretic Martin Luther who made the apocryphal discrimination. Also, some of the names of the books, people and places in Douay-Rheims are dif ferent from those of the same reference in Good News. Hence, 1 Samuel is actuall y 1 Kings, 2 Samuel is 2 Kings while 1 and 2 Kings are 3 and 4 Kings respectivel y. Chronicles is actually Paralipomenon, Joshua is really Josue, Hosea is actual ly Osee, Sirach is really Ecclesiasticus, Haggai is Aggeus actually, Zephaniah i s really Sophonias, Elijah is Elias, Elisha is really Eliseus, Ahab is Achab, Je remiah is really Jeremias, Isaiah is actually Isaias, Jonah is Jonas, Sheba is r eally Saba, Bathsheba is actually Bethsabee, Rehoboam is Roboam, Manasseh is Man asses, Shechem is Sichem, Zebulun is Zabulon, Canaan is Chanaan, etc. Moreover, most of the verses in Douay-Rheims begin with paragraphs and the verses are orde red but in Good News the verses are badly arranged.
Genesis 3:15 in the Douay-Rheims reads: I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her see d: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel. Genesis 3:15 in the Good News however reads: I will make you and the woman hate each other; her offspring and yours will alwa ys be enemies. Her offspring will crush your head, and you will bite their heel. ” The woman being referred to is Mary. She is the point of reference in the above quotation as is rightly shown by Douay-Rheims and not “her offspring” as is erro neously presented by Good News. She was preserved by GOD from all stain of origi nal sin and She lived and died without committing even the slightest actual sin. That was how She crushed the serpent’s head. The worst humiliation anyone can g ive satan is not to commit sin and Mary gave the devil more humiliation than any one can ever imagine. That is why he always inspires many unfortunate Catholics and non-Catholics alike with a hatred for Mary. Those who antagonize Mary in any way should know that each and every bit of their antagonism is inspired by Her worst enemy, “that old serpent, who is called the devil and satan, who seduceth the whole world.” Why then will a “Catholic Bible” downplay the prominence of Ma ry in Christianity by shifting GOD’S emphasis on Her away from Her under the pre tense of concentrating it on “her offspring”? Still on Mary, it is critically im portant to know that GOD so highly esteems Her that a hatred for the Hail Mary p rayer alone (not Mary Herself) is “a probable and proximate sign” that the hater is absolutely bound for Hell! 7 Those who think the world of their mothers shou ld imagine how GOD regards HIS OWN Mother Whom HE made the Mother of humanity. Exodus 32: 28 in the Douay-Rheims reads: And the sons of Levi did according to the words of Moses: and there were slain t hat day about three and twenty thousand (23,000) men. Exodus 32:28 in the Good News however reads: The Levites obeyed, and killed about three thousand (3,000) men that day. Numbers 16: 31-33 in the Douay-Rheims reads: And immediately as he had made an end of speaking, the earth broke asunder under their feet And, opening her mouth, devoured them with their tents and all their substance. And they went down alive into hell, the ground closing upon them: and they peris hed from among the people. Numbers 16:31-33 in the Good News reads: As soon as he had finished speaking, the ground under Dathan and Abiram split open and swallowed them and their families, together with all of Korah’s f ollowers and their possessions. So they went down alive to the world of the dead , with their possessions. The earth closed over them, and they vanished. In this context, the Good News’ “world of the dead” is not specific and it is de finitely not Hell. In Matthew X: 28, JESUS CHRIST confirmed that HE can destroy both body and soul in Hell, just as HE did to Core (not “Korah” as the Good News calls him) and his fellow schismatics. The souls of the damned are condemned to Hell after death and their bodies and souls will be reunited for the last judge ment before being finally cast into Hell forever (Apocalypse XX: 11-15) ! This reality is however too Catholic for the Good News! In the Douay-Rheims, the sixth chapter of the book of Tobias has 22 verses, whil e in the Good News, they are 17. Tobias 6:16-17 in the Douay-Rheims reads: Then the angel Raphael said to him: Hear me, and I will shew thee who they are, over whom the devil can prevail. For they who in such manner receive matrimony, as to shut out God from themselve s, and from their mind, and to give themselves to their lust, as the horse and m ule, which have not understanding: over them the devil hath power.
In the Good News, “Tobit” 6:16-17 reads: When you go into the bedroom, take the fish’s heart and liver with you and place them on the burning incense, so that the odour will spread throughout the room. When the demon smells it, he will leave and never come near Sarah again. But be fore you consummate the marriage, both of you must get up and pray for the Lord in heaven to be merciful to you and to protect you. Don’t be afraid. Sarah was m eant to be yours from the beginning of creation. You will rescue her from the de mon, and she will go with you to your home. You and Sarah will have many childre n, whom you will love very much. So don’t worry!” Tobias listened very carefully to what Raphael had to say. He knew that Sarah wa s a relative on his father’s side of the family. He began to fall in love with h er and looked forward to marrying her. Why the dubious omission of the warning against the abuse of matrimony? This is diabolical disorientation at its very best! The book of Esther in the Douay-Rheims has sixteen chapters while in the Good Ne ws, both the Hebrew and the so-called “Greek version” of the same book has only ten chapters. The book of Psalms in the Douay-Rheims is correctly numbered while in the Good N ews, Psalm 9 is divided into two so that the last eighteen verses of Psalm 9 bec ome “Psalm 10”. Hence “Psalm 11” in the Good News is actually Psalm 10, while “P salm 12” is actually Psalm 11, and so on. This error continues through “Psalm 23 ” (“The LORD is my SHEPHERD”), which is really Psalm 22; to Psalm 147 where it i s corrected. Psalm 147 has twenty verses but in truth, it is only verse 12 to ve rse 20 that make up the Psalm. Verses 1-11 is actually Psalm 146. In the Douay-Rheims, 2 Machabees 12:46 reads: It is therefore a holy and wholesome thought to pray for the dead, that they may be loosed from sins. In the Good News, there is no 2 Machabees 12:46! However, 2 Machabees 12:45 read s: In his firm and devout conviction that all God’s faithful people would receive a wonderful reward, Judas made provision for a sin-offering to set free from thei r sins those who had died. Has the existence of Purgatory suddenly changed from a divinely revealed truth o f GOD to a mere personal conviction of Judas Machabeus? Amazing! In the Douay-Rheims, Luke 1:28, 42 reads: And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lor d is with thee: blessed art thou among women. And she cried out with a loud voice and said: Blessed art thou among wom en and blessed is the fruit of thy womb. In the Good News however, Luke 1:28, 42 reads: The angel came to her and said, “Peace be with you! The Lord is with you and has greatly blessed you!” …and said in a loud voice, “You are the most blessed of all women, and blessed i s the child you will bear! Unbelievable! Where did we get the Hail Mary from? Did not Saints Gabriel and El izabeth compose the first part of the Hail Mary? That is what the Douay-Rheims s ays but is that what the Good News says? It might be a revelation to readers tha t to be “full of grace” means to be “sinless”, “immaculate”, “pure”, “perfect”; that is why Mary is the only one apart from JESUS (John I:14) to be described as “full of grace”, but of course Good News is too “updated” to be concerned with such matters. In Douay-Rheims, Luke 16:22 reads: And it came to pass that the beggar died and was carried by the angels into Abra ham’s bosom. And the rich man also died: and he was buried in hell.
In Good News, Luke 16: 22 reads: “The poor man died and was carried by the angels to sit beside Abraham a t the feast in heaven. The rich man died and was buried… First of all, Heaven was not open during the time of Lazarus and the rich man (J ohn III: 13) but Hell was (Matthew XXV: 41) and the rich man went there and he i s still languishing there even as you read this article and he will be there for ever! There is no confusion about the existence of Hell; many people now living, including those reading this article will end up there if they do not repent an d amend their lives. But the Good News is more interested in downplaying facts l ike these. In the Douay-Rheims, John 2:4 reads: And Jesus saith to her: Woman, what is that to me and to thee? My hour i s not yet come. In other words, “Woman, what is that to us”? In the Good News, the same verse reads: “You must not tell me what to do,” Jesus replied. “My time has not yet come.” The SACRED HEART of JESUS and the Immaculate Heart of Mary have always been, are still and will always be inseparable just as Saint Louis de Montfort wrote and rightly so, under the guidance of the HOLY SPIRIT in his classic, True Devotion to Mary: I here turn for one moment to Thee, O sweet Jesus, to complain lovingly to thy D ivine Majesty that the greater part of Christians, even the most learned, do not know the necessary union there is between Thee and Thy holy Mother. Thou, Lord, art always with Mary, and Mary is always with Thee, and she cannot be without T hee, else she would cease to be what she is. She is so transformed into Thee by grace that she lives no more, she is as though she were not. It is Thou only, my Jesus, who livest and reignest in her more perfectly than in all the angels and the blessed. Ah! If we knew the glory and the love which Thou receivest in this admirable creature, we should have very different thoughts both of Thee and her from what we have now. She is so intimately united with Thee that it were easie r to separate the light from the sun, the heat from the fire; nay, it were easie r to separate from Thee all the angels and the saints than the divine Mary, beca use she loves Thee more ardently and glorifies Thee more perfectly than all the other creatures put together.8 This kind of orientation about JESUS and Mary is however not compatible with tho se of Bibles like Good News or the New Missal Liturgical readings’ Jerusalem Bib le - a Bible whose 1985 “new edition’s” chronological appendix contains the monstrous errors that the wo rld is over two million years old and that man is a descendant of apes!!! In the Douay-Rheims, John 3: 13 reads: And no man hath ascended into heaven, but he that descended from heaven, the Son of man who is in heaven. Well, JESUS CHRIST the second PERSON of the MOST HOLY TRINITY is truly GOD (Matthew XXVIII: 20, John VIII: 58, John X: 30) and truly MAN (Matthew XXI: 18, John I: 14, John XII: 8). HE has the nature of GOD and that of man. As GOD, HE i s, has been, and always will be in Heaven and everywhere; and as man, HE incarna ted in Mary’s womb, was born, lived, suffered, died, descended into Hell, then a scended into Heaven and HE is always in the BLESSED SACRAMENT. That is what has been, what is and what will forever be; and it is what we have always known and believed. This was one of the focuses of Saint John’s Gospel.
But check out the Good News’ version of John 3:13. It says: And no one has ever gone up to heaven except the Son of Man, who came down from heaven. In other words, JESUS CHRIST stopped being in Heaven the moment HE incarnated in Mary’s womb. HE stopped being GOD as soon as he became MAN. Talk about a subtle but absolute denial of the divinity of CHRIST. Nestorius and Arius could not ha ve said it better. And to think that this is coming from a “Catholic Bible” wher e even the King James gets the verse correct is just too hard to tolerate. What an abomination!!! In Douay-Rheims, John 9:37-38 reads: And Jesus said to him: Thou hast both seen him; and it is he that talket h with thee. And he said: I believe, Lord. And falling down, he adored him. Why will a man fall down and adore JESUS? Objectively speaking, a man will fall down and adore JESUS if such a man is convinced that JESUS is GOD. In Good News, John 9:37-38 reads: Jesus said to him, “You have already seen him, and he is the one who is talking with you now.” “I believe, Lord!” the man said, and knelt down before Jesus. Now why will a man kneel before JESUS? Maybe the man was about to receive a chie ftaincy title or knighthood from JESUS or maybe he wanted to be blessed by JESUS or maybe he wanted to show gratitude or respect to JESUS or maybe he wanted to receive COMMUNION from JESUS or maybe JESUS wanted to pray for him: there is no objective interpretation of the action! The last thing that could have been on S aint John’s mind while writing his Gospel was to create confusion about the divi nity of JESUS CHRIST. But it seems to be main thing for Good News. Note that the non-Catholic King James is very clear in the above verses unlike Good News. Galatians 1:8, 9 in the Douay-Rheims reads: But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides t hat which we have preached to you, let him be anathema. As we said before, so now I say again: If any one preach to you a gospel , besides that which you have received, let him be anathema. Galatians 1:8, 9 in the Good News reads: But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel that is dif ferent from the one we preached to you, may he be condemned to hell! We have sai d it before, and now I say it again: if anyone preaches to you a gospel that is different from the one you accepted, may he be condemned to hell! Besides the automatic condemnation by the above passage of all those who have be en “revising” the Church’s doctrines since Vatican II, “Let him be anathema” has always been used by the Church in solemn condemnations right up to the First Va tican Council era. The Douay-Rheims shows that it, like the Church herself goes back to the Apostles and indeed, to JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF (1 Corinthians XVI: 22) . All that has changed since the Second Vatican Revolution and the Good News rig htly bears witness to that fact. When was a Pope last heard anathemising anybody for any heresy? That was before the Second Vatican Revolution. The comparison continues. Titus 1:5, 7 in the Douay-Rheims reads: For this cause I left thee in Crete: that thou shouldest set in order th e things that are wanting and shouldest ordain priests in every city, as I also appointed thee: For a bishop must be without crime, as the steward of God: not proud, not subjec t to anger, nor given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre: Titus 1: 5, 7 in the Good News reads:
I left you in Crete, so that you could put in order the things that still needed doing and appoint church elders in every town. Remember my instructions… For si nce a church leader is in charge of God’s work, he should be blameless. He must not be arrogant or quick-tempered, or a drunkard or violent or greedy for money. Saint Paul consecrated Saint Titus bishop so that Bishop Titus could ordain prie sts, among other duties. The ordination of priests by bishops was practised in t he Church way before the Bible came into existence. It was instituted by JESUS C HRIST, WHO passed it on to HIS Apostles who in turn handed it down successively until it came to us as the Douay-Rheims clearly indicates. But where on planet e arth did the Good News get the “appointment of church elders” and “church leader s” from? And the Good News is still being referred to as “Catholic” in spite of all these distortions. This is incredible! In the Douay-Rheims, 1 John 5:7 reads: And there are Three who give testimony in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost. And these three are one. In the Good News however, 1 John 5:7-8 reads: There are three witnesses: the Spirit, the water, and the blood; and all three g ive the same testimony. There is no reference whatsoever to the MOST HOLY TRINITY and yet, Good News Bib le is very popular among Catholics. Once again the non-Catholic King James Bible is more Catholic than Good News in this verse!!! What then is good or Catholic about Good News “Catholic Bible”? Perhaps, its diabolically disorienting nature. It must be pointed out however that Good News and its error filled counterparts are not invalid lest this article be taken out of contest. Their problem is tha t they are drastically distorted versions of the authentic vulgate done by man a t satan’s request. Furthermore, examinations of the biblical quotations in class ics like The Imitation of Christ by Venerable Thomas á Kempis (1379-1471), True Devotion to Mary by Saint Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort (1673-1716), Characte rs of the Inquisition by William Thomas Walsh (1891-1949) of blessed memory and all the Catholic books written before the Second Vatican Council shows that they are all verbatim with Douay-Rheims Bible. Then why is this Bible not as popular as Good News, Jerusalem and other error laden “Catholic Bibles” in mainstream C atholicism? Well, because we are living in the times of the greatest diabolical disorientation yet! THE PRIESTHOOD The priesthood of the Order of Melchizedek has not been spared in this delusion of satan either. Following the Second Vatican Revolution, Cardinal Gabriel-Mary Garrone of cursed memory became the Prefect of the Congregation for Catholic Edu cation. He was in charge of all the seminaries in the world. But the “Mary” in h is name should not fool anyone ¬because he was a Freemason! Sorry to burst anyon e’s bubble for those who never knew this, but we are in the Battle of the Ages a nd there have been so many casualties on both sides. However, there is hope beca use “in the end Her Immaculate Heart will triumph”, but with our cooperation of course. Back to Garrone; in the year 1976, an Italian journal, Borghese publishe d a list of clerics who were Masons. This list had the dates that some of the cl erics got initiated and their code names and numbers. It included among others, Archbishop Giovanni Benelli of cursed memory, the then Archbishop of Florence; C ardinal Jean Villot of cursed memory, the then Secretary of State to Paul VI, an d Camerlengo (the Chamberlain who takes over affairs at the Vatican on the death of a Pope), and also Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for Religious and Secul ar Institutes and administrator of the Patrimony of the Holy See (Codenames: Jea ni and Zurigo, Number: 041/3); Cardinal Agostino Casaroli of cursed memory, then Secretary of State and Prefect of the Sacred Congregation of Public Affairs, an d of the Sacred Congregation of Bishops, and of the Pontifical Commission for th e Revision of Canon Law, member of the Commission for Russia and of the Commissi
on for Latin America. He was the most influential prelate in the Vatican after t he Pope, whose place he took during the absence of the latter (Codename: Casa); Cardinal Leon Joseph Suenens the “Charismatic” of cursed memory, then Primate o f Belgium and member of the Pontifical Commission for the Revision of Canon Law (Code name: Lesu); and of course Garrone. A similar list was also sent by the ed itor of L’Osservatore Politico, Mino Pecorelli to Pope John Paul I but Mino was later assassinated.9 John Paul I himself will later die from drinking a poisone d glass of wine given to him by no other than Cardinal Jean Villot aka Jeani aka Zurigo (If you believe he died of a heart attack then you might as well believe anything). There was also Father Francesco Putti who regularly published the na mes of clerics that were actively working for the Freemasons against the Church from within in his journal, Si Si No No and in the same year that the Borghese l ist was published, he essentially confirmed to Father Nicholas Gruner of the Int ernational Fatima Rosary Crusade (IFRC) that the policies of Cardinal Garrone as the Prefect of the Congregation for Catholic Education had the Masonic goal of annihilating the Catholic Church written all over them.10 More worrisome is the fact that there is nothing to show that these allegations were investigated to establish if they were true or false. Needless to mention is the fact that there is nothing to show that disciplinary actions were taken against these Masonic i nfiltrators except perhaps, Bugnini’s disguised exile to Iran. Moreover, it is v ery likely that not all the Masons who infiltrated the Church and clergy were ex posed and even the exposed and unexposed among them must have been succeeded by other Masons who are still with us today and carrying out their diabolical progr am. But who or what is a Freemason? Theirs is a very long story, as long as the history of the Church herself. Let us just say that they are the exact opposite of the Catholic Church. They are the embodiment of the spirit (“I will not serve GOD and HIS Church”) of lucifer, their lord and master, who was a former angel from the rank of Seraphim. They are being used by him to prepare the world for t he coming of the anti-christ just as the Catholic Church is being used by GOD to prepare the world for the second coming of CHRIST. In order to do this, they ha ve eliminated the ancient monarchies of Europe and they also have to eliminate t he Church and the Mass or bring them as close to that as possible; and at the sa me time make the world absolutely corrupt and godless; control the world’s popul ation and its population growth; and through various satanic machinations, camou flages, conspiracies, intrigues, fronts, societies, fifth column-type organisati ons (RIIA, CFR, CIA, FBI, MI6, MI5, KGB, NASA, MOSSAD, UN, P2, Socialism, Commun ism, Illuminati, Wicca, Carbonari, Encyclopedists, One-Worlders, Trilateral Comm ission, Rosicrucians, Rhode’s Scholars, Skulls and Bones, Bilderbergers, various Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations, Lucis Trust, etc.), etc., stir up wars (a mong others, World Wars I, II and the future World War III if it will be allowed by our refusal to obey GOD and to practise True Devotion to Mary as well as the failure of the Pope and all his bishops to simultaneously consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary as HE has requested since 1929), revolutions (the P rotestant, French, Russian, Second Vatican and other revolutions) and upheavals of cataclysmic proportions to eventually set up a new world order under a false universality viz. one world government, economy, currency, religion, orientation , mentality, system, army, police, etc., but all without GOD. These people who h ave been accurately described in Apocalypse II:9, III:9 (Douay-Rheims) and by Bl essed Pius IX 11 as the “synagogue of satan” and by Our Lady of the Roses 12 as “the octopus of evil” are humanity’s worst enemy; their grand plan just like th at of their ancestors at Babel is against reason, order, society, civilisation, progress, development, the common good, GOD, HIS designs and all that HE stands for; and HE will confound them as HE did their worldly and godless Babelian ance stors (Genesis XI: 1-9). Moreover, if the description that “a man who questions dogma is already a Freemason without an apron” given by one Freemason called Jac ques Mitterand is anything to go by, then Freemasons will also include all the h eretics and anti-Catholics from or before Arius till date. So much for the Mason ic ancestry, now back to Garrone’s pernicious legacy. Imagine what a member of s uch a satanic institution like the Freemasons would do as a religious, priest, b ishop, cardinal or as the Prefect of the Congregation for Catholic Education. Be
fore the Second Vatican Revolution, the study for the priesthood took about six to eight years. It was divided into minor and major orders. The minor order bega n with porter/doorkeeper, reader/lector, exorcist and then acolyte. Progressing to the major orders, the candidate then rose through sub-deacon, deacon and even tually became a priest. The habit, formation, curriculum and foundation of studi es which were the principles of Saint Thomas Aquinas and in fact everything was totally different from Garrone’s. Now, the priesthood has been made to look less like a vocational training and more like a tuitional programme; the major and m inor orders have been suppressed and we have four years of philosophy, four year s of theology with pastoral year all amounting to nine years. But in spite of al l that, we still see Pentecostal priests, homosexual priests, “Charismatic” prie sts, confused priests, Modernist priests, paedophile priests, COMMUNION-in-the-h and priests, pro-abortion priests, progressive priests, corporate priests, caree r priests, political priests, Masonic priests, Communist priests, “ecumenism” pr iests, pagan priests, contraception priests, all kinds of priests, priests who a re anything but Catholic. This is not to say that they are no good ones. They ar e, but they and the faithful in their care are living in an ecclesial atmosphere that is fundamentally unfavourable for a pure Catholic life: an atmosphere that was fabricated by satan through Garrone and his co-conspirators. Attend Mass on June 29, the Feast of Saints Peter and Paul and you will likely hear a priest s aying in his homily that St. Peter represents the Legion of Mary, St. Anthony of Padua’s society, Saint Jude’s society, etc., while Saint Paul represents the “C harismatics”! Incredible! The “Charismatic” Movement is not even remotely Catho lic. If you are in doubt about this fact, trace its origin and it will lead you “outside the Church”, where “there is no salvation”. And if you allow GOD to gui de you perfectly, it will lead you down to the father of lies and the prince of darkness himself, the devil. This is what the real Pope Paul VI had to say about the “Charismatic” Movement: It attacks directly the very existence of the Church, leading to extinguishing t he real flame of Pentecost, disregarding the thought of Christ and of the whole of tradition.13 The movement is alien to the Church and will disappear in due course but priests are at the fore front of such an erroneous group. What a shame. “But yet the So n of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?” (Luke XVIII : 8, Douay-Rheims) How can priests after nine years of philosophy, theology and pastoral training remove the tabernacle from the altar as is obtainable in many parishes of the Western World or build a church and leave out the altar rail as was done in Blessed Tansi parish in Ugboroke, Warri diocese by Revered Father “B arrister” Edmund Emakpor in 2008? What is even more appalling is that the then a dministrator of his diocese, Most Reverend Doctor Richard Burke, SPS in the pers on of his representative, the then auxiliary bishop who is presently the bishop, Most Reverend Doctor John Afareha actually consecrated the church that way - wi thout an altar rail! Did anyone ask what the big deal about altar rail was? Well , communicants in the church receive HOLY COMMUNION standing! If altar rails wer e no big deal, then why leave them out? What then is the demarcation between the sanctuary and the rest of the church or the difference between the clergy and t he laity? Why should the CREATOR of Heaven and Earth be received standing? Who w ould want to be received standing if they were JESUS CHRIST? If GOD is so holy t hat we kneel when bread and wine changes into HIM during consecration, then why should we not kneel to physically receive HIM? Do we know that even for everyone wherever they are in the church, the official position during the distribution of COMMUNION is kneeling? Do we also know that each time we receive HOLY COMMUNI ON our venial sins are forgiven, our place in Heaven is raised forever and our s tay in Purgatory is shortened! Our LORD, JESUS CHRIST is present Body, Blood, So ul and Divinity in HOLY COMMUNION and HE revealed to Saint Gertrude the Great th at each time someone received COMMUNION, something good happens to every being i n Heaven and on Earth and in Purgatory; then why on earth should HE be received standing? Is this a prelude to COMMUNION in the hand in Warri diocese? Think abo ut it. Meanwhile the error has started to spread like a virus and like the prove rbial finger that stains the others after being stained with palm oil, parishes
like Corpus Christi have been infected and soon, others will succumb and before long, altar rails will be relegated to the “antiquated” part of the Church. What about Rev. Fr. Abraham Oyibocha of the same diocese? He once mounted the pulpit of Assumption parish, Idama, less than a month after his ordination in the same year to declare that there is nothing wrong with women wearing trousers to Mass or leaving their hair unveiled during Mass! He even disclosed that a seminarian was expelled from a seminary in Nigeria because he dared to correct a woman tha t wore trousers to Mass! The scandals just keep getting more and worse. It is co mmon these days for priests after the Gospel before their homilies to tell the c ongregation to clap, dance and sing “choruses” including the ones that are blata ntly Pentecostal! Fundraising and auctions are not only held on Sundays but righ t inside the church in the presence of the BLESSED SACRAMENT!!! Take for instanc e the ignoble case of Rev. Fr. Richard K. Akpan of Uyo diocese who organized an auction in the name of “harvest” on the twelfth of October in 2008 during a Mass at Saint Teresa’s Parish, Ikot-Abasi in between the Liturgy of the Word and the Liturgy of the EUCHARIST!!! What is more, there was no Creed during the Mass!!! What about Rev. Fr. Anselm Adodo, OSB, of the Benedictine monastery in Ewu-Esan of Uromi diocese, while it was under the jurisdiction of Benin archdiocese? He authored the error-laden and pro-occult The Healing Radiance of the Soul publish ed in 2003 that actually carried a foreword by no other than Most Reverend Docto r Michael O. Fagun, the Bishop of Ekiti diocese! The bishop even compared him to Saint Francis of Assisi!! What would Bernard Gui, Nicholas Eymeric, Tomás de To rquemada, Ximénes de Cisneros or any of the great grand inquisitors and the Inqu isition have said about such a book that deserves to be sentenced perpetually to the Forbidden Index? What a tragedy for the Catholic Faith! What diabolically i nfested times we are living through, what a scourge! May GOD save us all. A prie st was once asked during a seminar on the Assumption of Our Lady if it was reall y possible that Joseph and Mary lived together throughout their marriage without ever having sex. His lame reply was that the Church has proclaimed it a dogma t hat Mary is perpetually a Virgin and that after all, even married couples could afford not to “do it” every day! And he was trained for nine years to be a pries t, but has he read The Divine Life of the Most Holy Virgin by Venerable Mary of Agreda or True Devotion to Mary by Saint Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort or The Life of Christ and Dolorous Passion of Our Lord by Blessed Anne Catherine Emmer ich? Does he pray his Rosary everyday? The sight of Mary alone drives away all t race of concupiscence! Joseph and Mary had made vows of perpetual chastity befor e they ever met and after their marriage they both renewed their vows and “promi sed to mutually aid each other in the path of perfection.”14 They never slept in the same room! 15 What is more, when Joseph eventually understood the Mystery of the Incarnation, he offered himself to Mary as Her servant and took Her for h is Queen forever!16 We do not have the least idea of how Joseph was exclusively chosen to be the foster father of GOD by Divine Providence. According to Venerab le Mary of Agreda: “Never had he experienced the lightest sentiment of an impure or ill-regulated a ffection. At the age of three years he had an augmentation of grace in the highe st degree. The gift of contemplation had been given him, and at the age of seven years, equal to the Seraphim in purity, and had never had a thought or image co ntrary to this divine virtue. In fine, by his heroic virtue, he had merited to b e chosen as the foster father and adopted parent of the Son of God.”17 If Saint Joseph was that holy then what about Blessed Virgin Mary Herself? Saint Denis the Areopagite saw Mary in a vision and nearly mistook Her for GOD HIMSEL F had not his Catholic background taught him otherwise.18 Unfortunately, such a background is fast disappearing in many of our lives. Saint Henry II (973-1024) was the emperor of the Roman Empire in the Middle Ages. To give an idea of how powerful the emperor was in medieval times, imagine all the countries of Africa with their presidents to be under the rule of the president of Nigeria. One can picture the influence and power he will wield and the possibility that might be of his being corrupted as a result. Yet, Saint Henry remained a sublimely virtuo us king. He never slept with his wife the empress, Saint Cunegundes! Like Mary and Joseph, they both took vows to preserve their virginity for ever and they ke
pt their vows. At a point, some calumniators or rather the devil through them, a ccused Cunegundes of scandalous behaviour and she proved them wrong by walking o n red hot metals and emerging unscathed! What about Saint Edward the good King o f England who lived in continence with his wife throughout his life? What about Saint Audry (Ethelreda) of East Anglia, the princess who got married to Prince T onbert, survived him and went on to marry king Enfrid of Northumberland? She lat er retired to the monastery of Coldinghan and eventually proceeded to found anot her in the Isle of Ely. She preserved her virginity throughout her life as a wif e to two successive husbands and as a religious! She not only lived in continenc e with her husbands but completely edified and overwhelmed them with the most as tounding virtuous practices! Alas! How times have changed. These people were hum ans like us, yet they could achieve these by GOD’S grace. Then how much more the Woman who carried GOD for nine months in Her womb, and then breastfed HIM and r aised HIM up. Yet, a priest could say that after all it is not every day that ma rried couples “do it” when asked about Mary’s perpetual virginity. What is the b ig deal about virginity to Mary? Saint Teresa of Avila lived 67 years (1515-1582 ) and died a virgin, Blessed Teresa of Calcutta lived 87 years (1910-1997) and d ied a virgin, and Lucy of Fatima lived 98 years (1907-2005) and died a virgin. T hey are so many of them and these women all modelled themselves after Mary, Who was the first Virgin in Israel and indeed the whole world to consecrate Her virg inity to GOD and hence She is the Nun of nuns and Woman Religious of all women r eligious just as our LORD is the PRIEST of priests and MALE RELIGIOUS of all mal es religious. Before Mary, the women of Israel preserved their virginity for the ir future husbands but She preserved Hers exclusively for GOD and She was so con formed to HIS will that She would have got married and borne biological children if GOD wanted Her to. With these and other sublime and indescribable virtues, i t is not surprising that she eventually “forced” GOD out of Heaven and into Her womb. So what is the big deal about virginity to Mary? If GOD could make Her con ceive without sexual intercourse then what is the big deal about keeping Her a V irgin forever? If only we knew how much the Saints value virginity, we would not even think about thinking about questioning the virginal purity of the Queen of all Saints and the Queen of Virgins? Saint Benedict was once tempted to lust an d he took off all his clothes and rolled himself on some nettle and thorn plants repeatedly until his body was “pitifully rent”. After that, he was never tempte d to lust for the rest of his life! 19 But do we know that the satisfaction of t he ecstasy of prayer is far more pleasurable, more intense, more sublime and gre ater than that of sex? What can be compared to the magnificence of GOD’S grace? JESUS CHRIST was not joking when he said, “...The things that are impossible wit h men are possible with God.” (Luke XVIII: 27, Douay-Rheims) Furthermore, it is very common these days to hear priests in spite of all their philosophical, theo logical and pastoral training referring to the Catholic Church as “one of the Ch urches”, “the first Church”, “a Church”. That is so wrong! The Catholic Church i s not a Church but the one and only Church founded by JESUS CHRIST. A church is part of a parish; the Catholic Church is the collection of all the parishes in t he whole world. GOD is not a GOD of disorder. HE begot one JESUS CHRIST. HE crea ted one Blessed Virgin Mary, one Saint Michael, one Saint Peter, one Giovanni Mo ntini, one King David, one King Saul, one Judas Iscariot, one Adolf Hitler, one Bin Laden, one Sister Lucy and one of anybody that has ever lived, that is still living and that will ever live on this planet. Even the anti-christ will be one individual in his time. No two individuals have exactly the same DNA structure and finger prints, not even identical twins because we are all unique. How can G OD then deviate from this pattern of creation in establishing HIS OWN Institutio n on Earth after creating the members of this Institution and in the rest of the world unique? That will be most irrational. There is no other Church because a Church is united, holy, universal and apostolic. That is what the Catholic Churc h alone is and will always be the current crisis of Faith notwithstanding. This consequently begs the question: What is the Catholic Church in Nigeria doing in the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) in spite of Pius XI’s grave warning a gainst “ecumenism”? This is what he had to say about alliances like CAN in his e ncyclical expounding on religious unity:
…the Apostolic See cannot on any terms take part in their assemblies, nor is it anyway lawful for Catholics either to support or to work for such enterprises; f or if they do so they will be giving countenance to a false Christianity, quite alien to the one Church of Christ. Shall We suffer, what would indeed be iniquit ous, the truth, and a truth divinely revealed, to be made a subject for compromise? For here there is question of defending revealed truth. Jesus Christ sent His Apostles into the whole world in order that they might per meate all nations with the Gospel faith, and, lest they should err, He willed be fore hand that they should be taught by the Holy Ghost: [John XVI, 13] has then this doctrine of the Apostles completely vanished away, or sometimes been obscur ed, in the Church, whose ruler and defense is God Himself? If our Redeemer plainly said that His Gospel was to continue not only during the times of the Apostles, but also till future ages, is it possible that the object of fa ith should in the process of time become so obscure and uncertain, that it would be necessary today to tolerate opinions which are even incompatible one with an other? If this were true, we should have to confess that the coming of the Holy Ghost on the Apostles, and the perpetual indwelling of the same Spirit in the Ch urch, and the very preaching of Jesus Christ, have several centuries ago, lost a ll their efficacy and use, to affirm which would be blasphemy. But the Only-bego tten Son of God, when He commanded His representatives to teach all nations, obl iged all men to give credence to whatever was made known to them by "witnesses p reordained by God,"[Acts X, 41,] and also confirmed His command with this sanction: "He that believeth and is baptized sha ll be saved; but he that believeth not shall be condemned."[Mark XVI, 16] These two commands of Christ, which must be fulfilled, the one, namely, to teach, and the other to believe, cannot even be understood, unless the Church proposes a co mplete and easily understood teaching, and is immune when it thus teaches from a ll danger of erring. In this matter, those also turn aside from the right path, who think that the deposit of truth such laborious trouble, and with such length y study and discussion, that a man s life would hardly suffice to find and take possession of it; as if the most merciful God had spoken through the prophets an d His Only-begotten Son merely in order that a few, and those stricken in years, should learn what He had revealed through them, and not that He might inculcate a doctrine of faith and morals, by which man should be guided through the whole course of his moral life. These pan-Christians who turn their minds to uniting the churches seem, indeed, to pursue the noblest of ideas in promoting charity among all Christians: nevert heless how does it happen that this charity tends to injure faith? Everyone know s that John himself, the Apostle of love, who seems to reveal in his Gospel the secrets of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, and who never ceased to impress on the mem ories of his followers the new commandment "Love one another," altogether forbad e any intercourse with those who professed a mutilated and corrupt version of Ch rist s teaching: "If any man come to you and bring not this doctrine, receive hi m not into the house nor say to him: God speed you." [II John, 10] For which rea son, since charity is based on a complete and sincere faith, the disciples of Ch rist must be united principally by the bond of one faith. Who then can conceive a Christian Federation, the members of which retain each his own opinions and pr ivate judgment, even in matters which concern the object of faith, even though t hey be repugnant to the opinions of the rest? And in what manner, We ask, can me n who follow contrary opinions, belong to one and the same Federation of the fai thful? For example, those who affirm, and those who deny that sacred Tradition i s a true fount of divine Revelation; those who hold that an ecclesiastical hiera rchy, made up of bishops, priests and ministers, has been divinely constituted, and those who assert that it has been brought in little by little in accordance with the conditions of the time those who adore Christ really present in the Mos t Holy Eucharist through that marvellous conversion of the bread and wine, which is called transubstantiation, and those who affirm that Christ is present only by faith or by the signification and virtue of the Sacrament; those who in the E ucharist recognize the nature both of a sacrament and of a sacrifice, and those
who say that it is nothing more than the memorial or commemoration of the Lord s Supper; those who believe it to be good and useful to invoke by prayer the Sain ts reigning with Christ, especially Mary the Mother of God, and to venerate thei r images, and those who urge that such a veneration is not to be made use of, fo r it is contrary to the honor due to Jesus Christ, "the one mediator of God and men." [I Tim. II, 5] How so great a variety of opinions can make the way clear t o effect the unity of the Church We know not; that unity can only arise from one teaching authority, one law of belief and one faith of Christians. But We do kn ow that from this it is an easy step to the neglect of religion or indifferentis m and to modernism, as they call it. Those, who are unhappily infected with thes e errors, hold that dogmatic truth is not absolute but relative, that is, it agr ees with the varying necessities of time and place and with the varying tendenci es of the mind, since it is not contained in immutable revelation, but is capabl e of being accommodated to human life. So, Venerable Brethren, it is clear why this Apostolic See has never allowed its subjects to take part in the assemblies of non-Catholics: for the union of Chri stians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Ch rist of those who are separated from it, for in the past they have unhappily lef t it. To the one true Church of Christ, we say, which is visible to all, and whi ch is to remain, according to the will of its Author, exactly the same as He instituted it.20 The priesthood today is overflowing with innumerable instances of diabolical dis orientation but one more will be discussed before moving on. This is the aberrat ion called “extraordinary ministry” of HOLY EUCHARIST. Every Sacrament has an or dinary minister, which is a priest or a bishop except for Holy Order and Confirm ation where the ordinary minister is a bishop. The only Sacrament that has an ex traordinary minister, which is a deacon, is Baptism and it must be with the perm ission of a priest or a bishop. Also, a layperson may administer Baptism in a ca se of necessity. For example an unbaptized person is dying and wants to be bapti zed and there is no priest , bishop or deacon around; anybody irrespective of th eir gender, ecclesiastical state, religion, being or not being in a state of gra ce, etc., can baptize the dying person as long as the person administering the B aptism has the Church’s intention in mind. This is because of the priority of Ba ptism in salvation. There is no “extraordinary ministry” for the administration of the Sacrament of HOLY EUCHARIST even for deacons21 let alone seminarians and laypeople! A case of necessity requires a bishop or a priest to give approval fo r a deacon and where absent, a layman not a laywoman to administer the Sacrament for that situation and not to establish an “extraordinary ministry”. The Catech ism of the Council of Trent could not have said it better: To safe guard in every possible way the dignity of so august a Sacrament [HOLY E UCHARIST], not only is the power of its administration entrusted exclusively to priests, but the Church has also prohibited by law any but consecrated persons, unless some case of great ne cessity intervene, to dare handle or touch the sacred vessels, the linen, or oth er instruments necessary to its completion. Priests themselves and the rest of the faithful may hence understand how great s hould be the piety and holiness of those who approach to consecrate, administer or receive the Eucharist. 22 Take for instance a situation where two parishioners are dying in different part s of a parish and the priest can administer VIATICUM to only one of them or a pe rsecution of the Catholic Church breaks out in a region and forces the Church to go underground. A group o f Catholics who are not accessible because of the killings might get a deacon or if not avai lable, a layman and not a laywoman appointed by a bishop or a priest to bring them HOLY COMMUNIO
N. These are examples of cases of necessity that permit anyone other than a cons ecrated priest being appointed to administer the Sacrament of HOLY EUCHARIST. Th e “extraordinary ministry” takeover going on in certain dioceses of Nigeria is a radical departure from this normalcy! Take the case of the Carmelite priest and martyr, Blessed Titus Brandsma (1881-1942) for instance. While he was in the Na zi-controlled Dachau concentration camp before he was executed with lethal injec tion like Saint Maximilian-Mary Kolbe during the Second World War, a German prie st used to smuggle CONSECRATED HOST to him through a layman. Blessed Titus would then hide the COMMUNION in his eyeglass case and later distribute to others.23 That is a real life example of a case of necessity. It did not automatically mak e that layman an “extraordinary minister” of HOLY EUCHARIST wherever he found hi mself. But the Vatican or rather, some of its officials since the Second Vatican Revolution have invented “conditions” for the “extraordinary administration” of HOLY EUCHARIST in a way that radically departs from what JESUS CHRIST passed on to us through HIS Apostles. In essence, they have made it easier for HOLY EUCHA RIST to be abused with impunity, forcing this lamentation from the Agonizing JES US CHRIST to Barnabas Nwoye: MY agony is great when I see many of my Priests who leave my Sacred Body and Blo od to the non-consecrated Priests to serve my people. Remember my son that my Pr ecious Body and Blood is greater than the covenant I gave to Moses. All the Levi tes adored my presence with fear and love in the holy sanctuary. How much more m y son the Precious Blood of the new covenant.24 According to Immensae Caritatis, the document which “authorized” the “extraordin ary ministry” takeover in 1973, the “cases of genuine necessity” for the “extrao rdinary ministry” of HOLY EUCHARIST are when there is no priest, deacon or acoly te; when these are prevented from administering Holy Communion because of “anoth er pastoral ministry” or because of ill health or advanced age; when the number of the faithful going to Communion is such that the celebration of the Mass or t he distribution of Eucharist outside Mass would be “unduly prolonged”. A careful observation of these “cases of genuine necessity” reveals that there are actual ly no cases of genuine necessity for the “extraordinary ministry” at all. First of all, since when did a deacon or acolyte become an ordinary minister of HOLY E UCHARIST? Besides, when there is no priest there is no Mass and hence no COMMUNI ON to be distributed! How can “another pastoral ministry” (whatever that means) or ill health or advanced age allow a priest to begin a Mass and continue the sa me Mass through consecration only to prevent the same priest from distributing t he HOLY COMMUNION he has just consecrated and then after, allow him to conclude the Mass and dismiss the faithful? Incredible!!! Whatever prevents a priest from distributing HOLY COMMUNION should also prevent him from beginning the Mass in the first place. If he can offer Mass, then nothing should stop him from distrib uting HOLY COMMUNION. How can the number of the faithful requesting COMMUNION ju stify a deacon, seminarian, nun, female religious or layperson touching JESUS CH RIST with their unconsecrated hands? Is there any number of the faithful that wi ll justify any of these persons assisting a priest to hear confessions? Is the d istribution of COMMUNION not quicker than the hearing of confessions? How can th e same number of people that a priest will stay for hours to hear their confessi ons suddenly become too large when it is time to feed them with the BREAD OF LIF E? Is going to confession not longer than receiving HOLY COMMUNION? This cannot be from GOD! It is diabolical disorientation! How can the Mass be “unduly prolon ged” because the faithful want to receive their SAVIOUR, the food of souls into their hearts? In the Traditional Latin Mass after elevating JESUS CHRIST with th e thumb and forefinger of both hands, the priest holds these two fingers togethe r and does not touch any other thing with them except CHRIST until after washing them at the end of the distribution of HOLY COMMUNION (On the contrary, the pri est is free to shake hands and embrace after elevating JESUS CHRIST in the New M ass). If HOLY COMMUNION is so sacred that for the distribution, the ordinary min ister of the EUCHARIST, whose hands are consecrated for this purpose is not allo wed to touch any other thing after touching JESUS, how much more a non-consecrat
ed person, let alone a woman who is more often than not indecently dressed? Was it not through a woman that satan effected the fall of man? It was for this same reason that CHRIST in HIS time neither had a female Apostle nor allowed women i n the sanctuary during Mass, not even HIS Most Holy Mother! Nowadays, the “extr aordinary ministry” of HOLY COMMUNION is virtually incomplete without women. Cou ld there have been a better way to crucify JESUS CHRIST over and over again thro ugh HIS very own people, the people HE ransomed with HIS Most Precious Blood? Wh at a betrayal! Nevertheless, the “extraordinary ministry” takeover is well unde r way. It has not only been established in archdioceses like Benin, but a new Ur omi diocese has also been created out of the taken over diocese. The same goes f or Warri diocese where plans are underway to create Kwale and Ughelli dioceses s ince the “extraordinary ministry” of HOLY EUCHARIST has been “obediently” swallo wed hook, line and sinker by the naive faithful of the poor diocese. What a pity ! With the way things are going, if the trend is not reversed, the “extraordinar y ministry” takeover will culminate in every layperson in these and future taken over dioceses being an “extraordinary minister” courtesy of HOLY COMMUNION in t he hand!!! Is this far-fetched, ridiculous, or paranoid? Well, if the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council were told that the aftermath of the Council will be a Revolution that will lead to a Mass where the priest backs the tabernacle, a b are-breasted female lay reader in a Papal Mass (Papua New Guinea, 1984), Hindu p agan worship in the Fatima Shrine, a Pope bowing to and kissing a Koran, cookies being used as the matter of the Holy Mass, COMMUNION in the hand, an unpreceden ted decline in Mass attendance and vocations in the once Catholic West, ostpolit iks, paganization of the Mass in the name of inculturation, the Dutch Catechism, “Ordinary” Season, EWTN25, “liberation theology”, freaky Masses (Clown Mass, Co wboy Mass, Hindu Mass, Ballet Mass, Gym Mass, Choreography Mass, “Dance to the G lory of GOD” Mass, Red Indian Mass, Puppet Mass, Auction Mass, Fundraising Mass, Cake-cutting Mass, Pentecostal Mass, “Charismatic” Mass, Voodoo Mass, No-vestme nts Mass, etc.) among others, some of them might have dismissed these as far-fet ched, ridiculous or paranoid. Of course an invitation to any demon is an invitat ion to all demons. Consequently, in these aforementioned taken over dioceses mo re abominations will follow like the altar girls virus which has already infecte d Abuja, Jos, Kaduna, Kano, Lagos, Maiduguri, Makurdi and Yola, where the “extra ordinary minister” virus will subsequently follow, that is if it has not already infected these dioceses. Others may include but will not be limited to priests offering Mass in native attire, women homilists in the Mass , relocation of tabe rnacles, dancing masquerades in the Mass, sermons after the Gospel given by Pent ecostals, women priests, sliced bread and palm wine as the matter for consecrati on in “Masses”, collective “absolution”, COMMUNION being distributed in kitchen bowls, etc. Fortunately for Nigeria, with the coming of the SSPX (there are alre ady centres in Abuja, Asaba, Benin, Enugu, Lagos, Owerri and counting), those wh o think they are not being offered “stones instead of bread” in their parishes s hould hear Mass and experience Catholicism in the SSPX and then “choose for them selves whom they will rather serve.” THE CHURCH HIERARCHY The hierarchy of the Church is arguably the worst hit by this disorientation cam paign of the powers of Hell. Logically, just as bringing down an animal is easie r done by shooting it in the head than in anywhere else, the devil has targeted the Church hierarchy and those with responsibility in the Church more than other s. Prior to the Second Vatican Council, there had been continuous infiltration o f the Church and her hierarchy first by Freemasons and later on by Communists. F reemasons have always been condemned by GOD ever since HE first condemned their forefathers when they revolted against HIM and HE threw them out of Heaven (Apoc alypse XII: 1-18), but Clement XII is on record as the first Pope in time to off icially open fire on them and to “tear away the mask from Freemasonry” in 173826 , fifty-one years before they staged the French Revolution. His predecessors fol lowed suit but this did not stop Masons from doing their master’s bidding. In th e early nineteenth century, a secret document called Permanent Instructions, whi ch detailed a blueprint for the subversion of the Catholic Church, fell into the hands of Pope Gregory XVI27. It was written in 1818 or thereabouts by an Italia
n Masonic lodge called Alta Vendita, whose members included Karl Mayer Rothschil d, son of Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild, to whom is attributed the notorious st atement: "Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws. ” Subsequently, Gregory’s successors, Blessed Pius IX and Leo XIII requested the m to be published and this was done by Cretineau-Joly in his The Roman Church an d the Revolution and Msgr. George E. Dillon in his Grand Orient Freemasonry.28 Part of this satanic document reads: Our ultimate end is that of Voltaire and of The French Revolution - the final de struction of Catholicism, and even of the Christian idea… The Pope, whoever he is, will never come to the secret societies; it is up to th e secret societies to take the first step toward the Church, with the aim of con quering both of them. The task that we are going to undertake is not the work of a day, or of a month, or of a year; it may last several years, perhaps a century; but in our ranks th e soldier dies and the struggle goes on. What we must ask for, what we should look for and wait for, as the Jews wait for the Messiah, is a Pope according to our needs… With that we shall march more securely towards the assault on the Church than wi th the pamphlets of our brethren in France and even the gold of England. Do you want to know the reason for this? It is that with this, in order to shatter the high rock on which God has built His Church, we no longer need Hannibalian vineg ar, or need gunpowder, or even need our arms. We have the little finger of the s uccessor of Peter engaged in the ploy, and this little finger is as good, for th is crusade, as all the Urban IIs and all the Saint Bernards in Christendom. Now then, to assure ourselves a Pope of the required dimensions, it is a questio n first of shaping for this Pope a generation worthy of the reign we are dreamin g of. Leave old people and those of mature age aside; go to the youth, and if it is possible, even to the children. …You will contrive for yourselves, at little cost, a reputation as good Catholic and pure patriots. This reputation will put access to our doctrines into the midst of the young cle rgy, as well as deep into the monasteries. In a few years, by the force of thing s, this young clergy will have overrun all the functions; they will form the sov ereign’s council, they will be called to choose a Pontiff who should reign. And this Pontiff, like most of his contemporaries, will be necessarily more or less imbued with the [revolutionary] Italian and hum anitarian principles that we are going to begin to put into circulation. You want to revolutionize Italy; look for the Pope whose portrait we have just d rawn. You wish to establish the reign of the chosen ones on the throne of the prostitu te of Babylon; let the clergy march under your standard, always believing that t hey are marching under the banner of the Apostolic keys. You intend to make the last vestige of tyrants disappear; lay your snares [nets] like Simon Bar-Jona; l ay them in the sacristies, the seminaries and the monasteries rather than at the bottom of the sea; and if you do not hurry, we pr omise a catch more miraculous than his. The fisher of fish became the fisher of men; you will bring friends around the Apostolic Chair. You will have preached a revolution in tiara and in cope, marching with the cross and the banner, a revolution that will need to be only a little b it urged on to set fire to the four corners of the world.29 The Communists on their part started much later but the goal was much the same: destruction of the Catholic Church to pave way for the enthronement of satan. Th e following was documented by Fr. Paul Kramer in his The Devil’s Final Battle: Lenin himself (the very founder of Russian Communism) declared in the 1920s that
he would infiltrate the Catholic Church, particularly the Vatican. The historic al evidence on this score was recently summarized in the venerable periodical Ch ristian Order: Ex-Communist and celebrated convert Douglas Hyde revealed long ago that in the 1930s the Communist leadership issued a worldwide directive about infiltr ating the Catholic Church. While in the early 1950s, Mrs. Bella Dodd was also pr oviding detailed explanations of the Communist subversion of the Church. Speakin g as a former high ranking official of the American Communist Party, Mrs. Dodd s aid: “In the 1930s we put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to des troy the Church from within.” The idea was for these men to be ordained and pro gress to positions of influence and authority as Monsignors and Bishops. A dozen years before Vatican II she stated that: “Right now they are in the highest pla ces in the Church” - where they were working to bring about change in order to weaken the C hurch’s effectiveness against Communism. She also said that these changes will b e so drastic that “you will not recognize the Church.”… Mrs Dodd, who converted to the Faith shortly before her death, was legal counsel to the Communist Party of the United States. She gave voluminous testimony on C ommunist infiltration of Church and state before the House UnAmerican Activities Committee in the 1950s. As if to atone for her role in subverting the Church, D odd delivered a series of lectures at Fordham University and elsewhere during th e years leading up to Vatican II. Christian Order recounts the testimony of a mo nk who attended one of those lectures in the early 1950s: I listened to that woman for four hours and she had my hair standing on end. Eve rything she said has been fulfilled to the letter. You would think she was the w orld’s greatest prophet, but she was no prophet. She was merely exposing the ste p-by-step battle plan of subversion of the Catholic Church. She explained that o f all the world’s religions, the Catholic Church was the only one feared by the Communists, for it was its only effective opponent. The whole idea was to destroy, not the institution of the Church, but rather the Faith of the people, and even use the institution of the Church, if possible, to destroy the Faith th rough the promotion of a pseudoreligion: something that resembled Catholicism but was not the real thing. Once the Faith was destroyed, she explained that there would be a guilt complex intro duced into the Church. … to label the ‘Church of the past’ as being oppressive, authoritarian, full of preju dices, arrogant in claiming to be the sole possessor of truth, and responsible f or the divisions of religious bodies throughout the centuries. This would be nec essary in order to shame Church leaders into an ‘openness to the world’’, and to a more a flexible attitude toward all religions and philosophies. The Communists would then exploit this openness in order to undermine the Church .30 The Freemasons and Communists together with their Modernist allies within the Ch urch gained a signal victory even beyond their expectation during the Second Vat ican Council in spite of the warning Our Lady gave on Friday, July 13th, 1917 in Fatima in order to prevent this tragedy. They succeeded in hijacking the Counci l and turning it into the greatest Revolution yet of all time - and they have he ld sway in the Vatican ever since!!! Cardinal Mario Luigi Ciappi, personal theol ogian to Popes Pius XII, John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I and John Paul II speak ing about the contents of the yet to be fully revealed Third Secret of Fatima (W hat is the Vatican still waiting for? However, those who want to have an idea of what the Third Secret is about should check out http://www.smwa.org/Documents/B ayside_and_Fatima/Document_Heart_of_Third_scret_htm, http://www.smwa.org/Message /Text1980_1989/86_06.htm, http://smwa.org/Message/Text/Locutions_and_Home_Visita tion/91_13_10.htm, http://www.tldm.org/directies/d129.htm, http://www.tldm.org/d irectives/d130.htm, http://www.tldm.org/directives/d131.htm and http://www.tldm. org/directives/d132.htm ), which is part of the aforementioned warning given by Our Lady to the children of Fatima on Friday, July 13th in 1917 at the Cova da I
ria, Fatima, disclosed that “it predicted among other things that the Great Apos tasy in the Church will begin at the top”.31 Before the Second Vatican Revolutio n, the Vatican was run by the Holy Office now called the Congregation for the Do ctrine of the Faith. The head of the Holy Office was the Pope and he had the fin al say in all matters of ecclesiastical jurisdiction. After the Revolution, Card inal Villot of cursed memory re-organized and renamed the Holy Office and put t he Secretary of State, the “Prime Minister of Catholic Church” in charge with th e Pope then made a mere figure head. Just before the Council began in 1962, Card inal Eugene Tisserant met with Metropolitan Nikodim and an agreement was reached in which representatives of the Russian Orthodox Religion will be invited to be observers at the Council on the condition that the Council will not condemn the plague called Communism. This pestilence, a fruit of Freemasonry which is also called Marxist atheism is satanic, anti-human, anti-Catholic and anti-GOD; the C hurch has always condemned the evil. One of such was given by Pope Pius XI in th e following words: See to it, Venerable Brethren that the Faithful do not allow themselves to be de ceived! Communism is intrinsically evil, and no one who would save Christian civilizatio n may collaborate with it in any undertaking whatsoever. Those who permit themse lves to be deceived into lending their aid towards the triumph of Communism in t heir own country will be the first to fall victims of their error. And the great er the antiquity and grandeur of the Christian civilization in the regions where Communism successfully penetrates, so much more devastating will be the hatred displayed by the godless. At the same time the State must allow the Church full liberty to fulfill her div ine and spiritual mission, and this in itself will be an effectual contribution to the rescue of nations from the dread torment of the present hour. Everywhere today there is an anxious appeal to moral and spiritual forces; and rightly so, for the evil we must combat is at its origin primarily an evil of the spiritual order. From this polluted source the monstrous emanations of the communistic sys tem flow with satanic logic. Now, the Catholic Church is undoubtedly preeminent among the moral and religious forces of today. Therefore the very good of humani ty demands that her work be allowed to proceed unhindered. We cannot conclude this Encyclical Letter without addressing some words to those of Our children who are more or less tainted with the Communist plague. We earn estly exhort them to hear the voice of their loving Father. We pray the Lord to enlighten the m that they may abandon the slippery path which will precipitate one and all to ruin and catastrophe, and that they recognize that Jesus Christ, Our Lord, is their only Savior: "For ther e is no other name under heaven given to man, whereby we must be saved."[Acts, I V, 12]32 Yet, all the documents at the Council that were supposed to state the Church’s t rue position with regard to Communism never materialized. What about the satanic trio of Cardinals Jean Villot, Agostino Casaroli and Giovanni Benelli who insid iously usurped the pontificate of Pope Paul VI and eventually pulled off the gre atest deception of the twentieth century by supplanting him in 1975 with an impo stor Pope in order to more surreptitiously carry out their satanic schemes and d iabolical disorientation? 33 Even Traditionalists like Lefebvre of blessed memor y were taken in by this deception, the Great Deception. Has anyone not ever wond ered why “Paul VI” never openly and personally denounced Archbishop Lefebvre unt il the May 24th 1976 allocution to the Consistory of Cardinals – a year after th e Great Deception? Moreover, Lefebvre was granted an audience with the “Pope” on September 11 of the same year after being denied it for the previous five years on the grounds that he must first submit to the post-conciliar madness, shut do wn his seminary and end his great apostolate. Though he never submitted to any o f the conditions, he was granted the audience all of a sudden! Even Marcel the G
reat found this development unexpected and he made it known to Father Domenico L a Bellarte, the priest who brought the message from the Archbishop of Chieti on behalf of the “Holy Father”. But according to the messenger, "There has been a c hange. Something has changed at Rome in the situation with regard to you." The a udience itself took place in the most unusual atmosphere, much too bizarre for a papal audience. According to Marcel the Great: …I went to Castelgandolfo, and there I really believe the Holy Angels had driven out the Vatican employees because I had come back there… I went through all the rooms: there are at least seven or eight before you come to the Holy Father s o ffice. Not a living soul! Usually - I have often been to private audience in the days of Pope Pius XI, Pope Pius XII, Pope John XXIII, and even Pope Paul VI - t here is always at least one Swiss Guard, always a gendarme, always several peopl e: a private chamberlain, a monseigneur who is present if only to keep an eye on things and prevent incidents. But the rooms were empty - nothing, absolutely n othing. So I went to the Holy Father s office, where I found the Holy Father wit h Mgr. Benelli at his side.34 All in all, the atrocities of these three satanic cardinals such as the cruel pe rsecution of Paul VI (who had “much to suffer” from these agents of satan) and Traditional Ca tholics, falsification and forgery of papal documents, practice of satanism in t he Vatican and the assassination of Pope John Paul I by Villot35 inter alia are so unprecedented that the demon Beelzebub during an exorcism of a Swiss woman he, Judas and other demons had pos sessed, asserted that “in former times, during the fifteenth century, that sort of thing would have led them to the stake as sorcerers”.36 What about the Balam and agreement in 1993 between Cardinal Edward Idris Cassidy, the then head of th e Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Promoting “Christian Unity” and various Ortho dox representatives that the return of schismatics to the Catholic Church is now “outdated ecclesiology”? What about the Joint Declaration on Justification in 1 999 between the same Cardinal Cassidy, Cardinal Walter Kasper, his successor the n still a bishop and some officials of the Lutheran World Federation that “a con sensus had indeed been reached in basic truths of the doctrine of justification” between the “Catholic Church” and the Lutherans. Who were these cardinals repr esenting? Certainly not the Catholic Church! It was under the leadership of the same Cassidy that the Council for Promoting “Christian Unity” promulgated the ho rrendous 1993 Directory for the Application of the Principle and Norms of “Ecume nism.” This document would have horrified the worst of the pre-Vatican II popes like Alexander VI. Among other unprecedented sacrileges, it: • allows Protestants to conduct the readings (except the Gospel) in a Cath olic church [#133] • encourages common "spiritual exercises" and "retreats" between Catholics and Protestants [#114] • allows non-Catholics to lecture in seminaries [#81] • commands that young children be taught “ecumenism” in the schools [#68] • commands priests to take part in the "continuous aggiornamento" of “ecu menical” teaching and practice [#91] • mandates “ecumenism” for priests and religious in their years of formati on [#’s 51, 70] • encourages diocesan bishops to lend their parish churches to non-Catholi cs for their prayer services [#137] • promotes interdenominational prayer-services among Catholics and Protest ants in each • other’s “churches” [#112] • encourages the joint publication of an interdenominational Bible between Catholics and protestants [#185] • discourages Catholics from attempting to convert non-Catholics [#’s 23,
79, 81, 125] • recommends the construction of a single “church” to be owned and used by both Catholics and non-Catholics [#138] • Further recommends that in these joint “churches”, the Blessed Sacrament be placed in a separate chapel or room so as not to offend non-believers. [#139 ] What about Cardinal Kasper’s statement that the Old Covenant is still in force, and that Jews do not have to convert to the Catholic Church for salvation; that Vatican II and Ut Unum Sint, "acknowledge explicitly that the Holy Spirit is operating in the other ‘churches’ and ‘church communities’; that there is no idea of an arrogant claim to a monopoly of salvation"; that "several aspects of being church are better realized in other ‘churches’ and the refore, ‘ecumenism’ is no one-way street, but a reciprocal learning process”; an d “that the way to unity is therefore not the return of others into the fold of the Catholic Church." Surely, he has not failed in consolidating on his predeces sor’s ecumenistic achievements. It seems that the Vatican’s hierarchical positio ns in the post-conciliar era are meant for birds of a particular feather. While on his way to Brazil in May 2007, Pope Benedict XVI in a press co nference condemned the pro-abortion campaign of politicians in Mexico and commended their bishops for invoking their excommunication. However, in the subsequent release of the Pope’s statement, the Secretary of State or rather, the Catholic Church “ Prime Minister”, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone expunged the condemnation on the grou nds that it was “extemporaneous and had to be cleaned up for publication”. Talki ng about Tarcisio Bertone, what about his and his predecessor, Cardinal Angelo S odano’s mendacious interpretation of the Third Secret of Fatima and also the bar efaced lie that the June 2000 release was all there was to the Secret? The menta l reservation being suggested by Dr. Antonio Socci, Fr. Nicholas Gruner or any o ther person just does not make sense. The reason for disobeying GOD and HIS holy Mother by suppressing the Third Secret must definitely be more sinister. What a bout the false impression that the Tridentine Mass was forbidden after the Secon d Vatican Revolution and the persistent refusal of bishops to reinstate it in th eir dioceses even after Benedict XVI’s August 7, 2007 (7-7-7) motu proprio, Summ orum Pontificum liberating the Mass though it was never forbidden in the first p lace? What about Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran’s gratitude to Muslims for “demandin g a space for God in Europe”? What about the ceaseless persecution by Vatican of ficials of Father Nicholas Gruner, the International Fatima Rosary Crusade (IFRC ), Mother Angelica and others who have dared to say the truth about the Message of Fatima? What about the persistent efforts by Vatican officials to bury the pu blic prophetic Message of Fatima in oblivion? What about the failure of the Pope and all his bishops to consecrate Russia simultaneously to the Immaculate Heart of Mary since 1929, in spite of the promise that it will bring peace to the wor ld and that failure to do it will result in disasters for the Pope, the Church a nd the world including the annihilation of nations? What about the Assisi “praye r” meetings and other ecumenistic follies? What about the May 5th, 2004 desecrat ion of the Fatima Shrine with Hindu rituals in the name of interreligious dialog ue by the shrine rector, Msgr. Luciano Guerra and the then Bishop of Leiria-Fati ma, Serafim de Sousa Ferreira e Silva and the shrine authorities’ attempt to dis rupt the SSPX’ and other faithful’s reparation for the desecration on August 22 of the following year? What about the invitation to the New Age Spiritualism Pag an Leader, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar to promote his paganism in the Basilica of Sain t Joseph s Oratory in Montreal, Canada which actually took place on August 14, 2 004? On Oct. 10, 2003 in Fatima, less than a year before the desecration of the Fatima shrine, Monsignor Luciano Guerra held a pan-religious conference called " The Present of Man - the Future of God: the Place of Sanctuaries in Relation to the Sacred". Speakers at this conference tried to outdo one another with sacrile gious pronouncements. In this conference:
• Father Jacques Dupuis, S.J from Belgium called the defined dogma “outsid e the Church there is no salvation” a “horrible text” that must be rejected. He said, “There is no need here to invoke that horrible text from the Council of Fl orence”. Dupuis claimed that all religions are positively willed by GOD and that non-Catholics do not have to convert to the one true Catholic Church for unity and salvation. He likewise said that Catholics and non-Catholics are equal membe rs in the “Reign of God”. Dupuis also said that the purpose of “ecumenical” dial ogue is not to convert non-Catholics to the Catholic Church, but to make “a Chri stian a better Christian, a Hindu a better Hindu”. Dupuis said further that the Holy Ghost is present and operative in the “sacred books” and “sacred rites” of Buddhism and Hinduism. • Father Arul Irudayam, Rector of the Marian Shrine in Vailankanni, India told the audience that Hindus now perform their pagan rituals inside the Sanctua ry of Vailankanni’s Catholic Shrine. And to all these and other heretical comments, the Shrine Rector, Guerra; the th en Bishop of Leiria-Fatima, Silva; the Apostolic Delegate of Portugal, Cardinal Jose da Cruz Policarpo of Lisbon and Archbishop Michael Fitzgerald of the Pontif ical Council for Interreligious Dialogue all applauded!!! What about the anonymo us announcement from the Vatican through the A.N.I. news agency in 1960 that the Third Secret of Fatima “will never be revealed”? This is a Secret Our Lady dire cted to be revealed in that year and to which Pius XII had agreed on behalf of t he Church before he passed on in 1958.Then some unknown persons announces someth ing else: an anonymous hierarchy is making vital decisions for the Church!!! Wha t would have happened if the stewards at Cana had refused to follow Our Lady’s i nstruction? Blessed is the generation that follows Our Lady’s request for they w ill certainly not undergo the chastisement we are currently suffering in the Chu rch. Why were the days of fasting in Lent decimated to just Ash Wednesday and Go od Friday? How then will there be Saints? How then are we going to get Russia co nsecrated as Our Lady requested? Why were Feasts like that of the Most Precious Blood of our LORD JESUS CHRIST (July, 1), that of the Finding of the Holy Cross (May, 3), that of Saint Peter’s Chains (August, 1), that of the Impression of th e Stigmata on Saint Francis (September, 17), that of the Finding of the Body of Saint Stephen (August, 3), that of Saint Philomena (August, 11), etc., removed f rom the Liturgical calendar. Why was the Feast of Saint Benedict moved from Marc h 21 to July 11, the Feast of Saint Thomas Aquinas from March 7 to January 28, t he Feast of Saint Gregory the Great from March 12 to September 3, and so on? Why was the Feast of CHRIST the KING moved from the last Sunday of October as was o riginally instituted by Pope Pius XI? 37 What happened to Septuagesima, Mass for the dead, Liturgical color black and the wonderful, glorious Liturgical calenda r of the Holy Roman Catholic Church? Before the Second Vatican Council, the Litu rgical colors of the Mass were five: black, green, red, violet and white. Presen tly, black has been suppressed and has been replaced with violet in funeral Mass es! Also, some priests have been very “creative” with regard to Liturgical color s: on First Saturdays, they drape the altar with blue materials having pictures of Our Lady - how ingenious! Before 1950, every Mass was liturgically ranked in descending order as either one of the following: double of first class, double o f second class, double major feast, double feast, semi-double feast, simple feas t and vigil. On ferial days no feast was appointed. After the Second Vatican Rev olution, we now have solemnity, feast, memorial (obligatory or “optional”) and f eria. The problem with the “new terminologies” is that solemnity and feast mean the same thing. Every Mass is a Feast, every Mass is a Solemnity and every Mass is a Re-enactment. It is just like saying that the Liturgical rank of a Mass is sacrifice. Duh! Every Mass is a Sacrifice! In essence, the Liturgical rankings o f the Mass have been reduced from seven to zero: there are no rankings any more, they have been discarded!! What happened to the prohibition on the administrati on of Matrimony from Advent to Epiphany and from Ash Wednesday until the octave of Easter inclusively? 38 What happened to Gregorian chant, the Oath against Mod ernism, Forty Hours Devotion, Sacred Music, the Pontifical Gregorian University of Rome; what happened to the Catholic Faith, the Faith of the Saints Benedicts,
Dominics, Francis’, Anthonys, Gregories, Lawrences, Agneses, Margarets, Elizabe ths, Roses, Catherines, Little Flowers, Marias, Teresas, Angelas and of all the Saints that we celebrate today and name our children after? Why the explosion an d ceaseless outpouring of scandals and heresies especially from the Church hiera rchy and clerics, and the servile capitulation of the laity in the name of “obed ience”? Why? Saint Alphonsus Liguori could not have said it better: “A scandalous priest is worse than a heretic”! PRAYER AND WORSHIP Our mode of prayer and worship is not left out in this diabolical disorientation program. In Matthew VI: 5-13, our LORD taught us how to pray and how not to pra y by composing the Our FATHER and warning against prayer patterns that are again st the HOLY SPIRIT, the SPIRIT of the Church, like the noisemaking and other sty les predominant in the various denominations of the Pentecostal Religion and in the “Charismatic” circle. Unfortunately, these prayer styles have also become po pular among us. The HOLY SPIRIT is the SPIRIT of Love. HE is GOD and GOD is LOVE . HE is not a SPIRIT of confusion, disorder or destruction! So when people yell, “Holy Ghost”! “Fire”! “Holy Ghost Fire burn all my enemies”! “Holy Ghost Fire p ursue them”! etc., it is not the HOLY GHOST that they invoke but satan, the devi l, the serpent, the dragon, the prince of darkness and of the world and his legi on of demons. The HOLY GHOST is the third PERSON of the HOLY TRINITY. HE proceed s from the FATHER and the SON, WHO performed the most stupendous miracles, renew ed the world and opened the gates of Heaven without ever yelling, “Holy Ghoooost ”! “Fire”! So, who do we emulate when we do this? Not HIM certainly. To worsen t he situation, priests have joined this erroneous bandwagon. Imagine a priest dur ing Benediction abandoning the laid down glorious prayers and hymns of the Churc h to ramble on like a drunk or a toddler or to intone some Pentecostal song like Do something new in my life. Is there any Saint that was known for shouting “Ho ly Ghost Fire”? Talking about the Saints, here is what one of them, Saint Anthon y of Padua, who is a Doctor of the Church has to say about the Pentecostal Catho lic style of Prayer: The people of the world are slaves of empty signs and wonders. Men of your days have lost their faith. Magicians have taken advantage of them! See how they shout the Holy Names; “Holy Ghost Fire!”, “Blood of Jesus!”, “Jesus !” Holy Ghost! etc. Like the false prophets of Baal in the time of Elijah, they think that by shouting, Holy Ghost Fire, fire is coming out of their mouth to bu rn their enemies, or by shouting ‘Blood of Jesus’, blood is pumping from their m outh to the people. But this is a great insult to the Holy Name of God. It is th e sign of the emptiness of the world. Know you today that the Holy Ghost fire is the fire of God’s love that comes fro m the Throne of the Divine Trinity. This is the fire that illuminates Heaven wit h everlasting happiness and strengthens the holy souls on earth. It is the fire of love, and of sanctification. But you see that the people of the earth are now calling this gentle fire of love, the fire of destruction. They call this fire to burn their enemies or even, to burn Satan. God’s fire is love, and it is an a buse of the Holy Ghost fire to call it to burn Satan, since God has the fire of the abyss for them. My friend, you should know that the fire that consumed Sodom and Gomorrah was no t the fire of the Holy Ghost, but the fire of the abyss. The fire which Elijah c alled down to burn the sacrifice, in his combat with the prophets of Baal was, n ot the Holy Ghost fire but the fire of God’s approval. My friend, do not confuse these fires with the Holy Ghost fire. God sends different kinds of fire in the world at different times to fulfill His holy purpose. You can see the action of the Holy Ghost Fire on the day of Pentecost. The Holy Ghost descended on the Apo stles with His fire rested on each one of them. This fire sanctified, and filled them with power.39 Simply put, prayer is a spiritual exercise not physical. Read Golden Peace of Si lence by Barnabas Nwoye, the book of the above quotation if you are really inter ested in learning how to pray and also The Interior Castle and The Way of Perfec
tion by Saint Teresa of Avila. That said, there have been some really disturbing innovations in our prayer heritage. We have had them for ages and the numerous Saints that are associated with them should leave us in no doubt about their eff icacy. What are the extraneous Luminous mysteries of the Rosary all about? The R osary as we know it today was given by Our Lady to Saint Dominic Guzman (1170-12 21) at the beginning of the thirteenth century comprising 150 Hail Mary’s and th ree cycles of mysteries: Joyful, Sorrowful and Glorious. Our Lady was perfect th roughout Her life on Earth. Could She then be affected with any kind of “amnesia ” after assuming to Heaven? She did not even come on Her behalf but as GOD’S han dmaid as She has always been. So if She forgot the Luminous mysteries in the thi rteenth century, then GOD also must have forgotten and where does that leave us? Was it not these mysteries that gave us those famous victories over the Albinge nsians in Muret (1213), the Muslims in Lepanto (1571), in Vienna (1683) and in H ungary (1716), the Communists in Austria (1956) and in Brazil (1964), and so on and so forth? How then did they become “incomplete” all of a sudden? This diabol ical disorientation is killing us! A very popular foolery among us is the fake s peaking in tongues, which is actually from Hell. There are only two kinds of spe aking in tongues. One is that which occurred on Pentecost when the Apostles spok e and people of all languages understood (Acts II: 1-12). This gift was exhibite d by Saints like Philip Benizi and the legendary Anthony of Padua, Vincent Ferre r and Pio of Pietrelcina. The other was explained by Saint Paul in 1 Corinthians XIV: 13, 14, 18, 19, 22, 23, 27, 28, and 33, which though not understood by all is nevertheless understood by an interpreter who makes its meaning clear to oth ers. GOD is not disorderly, HIS SPIRIT is not disorderly, HIS inspirations are n ot disorderly, HIS works are not disorderly, HIS people are not disorderly, HIS Church is not disorderly; therefore HIS prayers are not and can never be disorde rly. Nothing linked to HIM is disorderly. “Charismatics” and Pentecostal Catholi cs should take note. The greatest form of prayer, the Sacrifice of the Holy Mass has also been blasted with diabolical disorientation. The Traditional Latin Mas s is an invaluable treasure bequeathed by our LORD through his Apostles to us. I t existed as various closely related variants throughout the East and West and w as eventually codified by Pope St. Pius V following the Council of Trent. It was consequently also called the Tridentine Mass after the city of Trent or the Mas s of St. Pius V after Saint Pius V. In promulgating the Missal for this Mass in 1570, Pope St. Pius V solemnly decreed: This Missal is to be used by all churches, even by those which in their authoriz ation are made exempt, whether by Apostolic indult, custom, or privilege, or eve n if by oath or official confirmation of the Holy See, or have their rights and faculties guaranteed to them by any other manner whatsoever. …We order and enjoin that nothing must be added to Our recently published Missal , nothing omitted from it, nor anything whatsoever be changed within it under th e penalty of Our displeasure. We specifically command each and every patriarch, administrator, and all other persons or whatever ecclesiastical dignity they may be, be they even cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, or possessed of any other rank or pre-eminence, and We order them in virtue of holy obedience to chant or to read the Mass according to the rite and manner and norm herewith laid down by Us and, hereafter, to discontinue and completely discard a ll other rubrics and rites of other missals, however ancient, which they have cu stomarily followed; and they must not in celebrating Mass presume to introduce a ny ceremonies or recite any prayers other than those contained in this Missal. Furthermore, by these presents [this law], in virtue of Our Apostolic authority, We grant and concede in perpetuity that, for the chanting or reading of the Mas s in any church whatsoever, this Missal is hereafter to be followed absolutely, without any scruple of conscience or fear of incurring any penalty, judgment, or censure, and may freely and lawfully be used. Nor are superiors, administrators , canons, chaplains, and other secular priests, or religious, of whatever title designated, obliged to celebrate the Mass otherwise than as enjoined by Us. We l ikewise declare and ordain that no one whosoever is forced or coerced to alter t his Missal, and that this present document cannot be revoked or modified, but re main always valid and retain its full force—notwithstanding the previous constit
utions and decrees of the Holy See, as well as any general or special constituti ons or edicts of provincial or synodal councils… Therefore, no one whosoever is permitted to alter this notice of Our permission, statute, ordinance, command, precept, grant, indult, declaration, will, decree, and prohibition. Should know that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and o f the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.40 Moreover, the thirteenth canon of the seventh session of the Council of Trent sa ys: If any one saith, that the received and approved rites of the Catholic Church, w ont to be used in the solemn administration of the sacraments, may be contemned, or without sin be omitted at pleasure by the ministers, or be changed, by every pastor of the churches, into other new ones; let him be anathema.41 In spite of these grave warnings, a totally different Missal, which is the one m ore common today, came out 400 years later in 1970. This Missal contained the Ne w Mass, a total distortion of the Traditional Latin Mass, drawn up by the Consilium whose prefect, Archbish op Annibale Bugnini of cursed memory was an active Freemason (Codename: Buan). H e was later exiled to Iran after his cover was blown but the damage had already been done. Incredibly, Bugnini and his cohorts’ aberration of the Traditional Ma ss is still being slavishly clung to by clergy and laity alike in spite of its m anifest absurdities. It is more popular than the Tridentine, which it “substitut ed” after its promulgation, particularly in the Mainstream Catholic churches. Th is is a clear case of diabolical disorientation. The validity of the New Mass is however not in doubt but it is still an adulterated version of the Tridentine. A comparison of the Traditional Latin Missal with that of the Novus Ordo will re veal some of the adulterations but before that, some of the basic flaws of the N ew Mass will be pointed out. The New Mass unlike the Traditional Latin Mass whic h has given us all the Saints that we venerate and celebrate today is very susce ptible to innovations and abuses. Prominent among them are clapping and dancing. It has always been and still is forbidden to dance during the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Even in the post-conciliar era, the Communist, Masonic and Modernist infiltrated Vatican has warned against this abuse in documents like Notitiae (11 , 202-205) of 1975. Yet, dancing is still very common in the New Order Mass. Cat holic hymns naturally do not evoke clapping and dancing because they are liturgi cal. They are proper to the Mass. On the other hand, “choruses” are virtually in complete without clapping and dancing. They are not liturgical. They are inappro priate for the Solemn Sacrifice of the Holy Mass. Some may be edifying but not d uring the Mass, before the BLESSED SACRAMENT. The Vatican has also condemned und ue experimentation like overlaying the Eucharistic Prayers with improvisations i n documents like Inaestimable Donum issued in 1980. Yet, priests still go on add ing to and removing from the Eucharistic Prayers. The priest offers Mass with th e Church’s intention in mind and not according to his personal inclination becau se among other reasons, the Missal is complete - or is it? It is supposed to con tain all that there is to the Mass. Yet, it seems that Catholics in the new era have developed a subconscious and/or unconscious and/or conscious notion of the Mass being incomplete or in need of being updated. Could this have anything to d o with Bugnini being a Freemason? Yes, it absolutely has! Otherwise, how can one explain bands and the use of musical instruments in Liturgical worship other th an the pipe organ, which is the only permitted musical instrument?42 With the wa y things are going, one may have to contend with priests employing the services of DJs in future or even present Masses. Others include the endless “remixing” o f the Kyrie, Gloria and Credo, the use of altar girls, combination of the Mass w ith Pentecostalism, paganism, choreography, ballet, folk dance and music, etc. T hese abuses continue unabated and they vary from place to place throughout the w orld. On the other hand, the Tridentine Mass is less prone to this diabolical di sorientation. There is also another fundamental flaw of the New Mass in contrast to its Traditional counterpart. This is the confusion of roles between clergy a nd laity, and between men and women. The laity apart from altar servers has no r ole to play in the sanctuary let alone on the altar in the Traditional Mass but
in the Novus Ordo, they do some of the readings and what is more, in many cases they do it from the same pulpit used by the priest or bishop for the Gospel and homily. They are also some very despicable cases where the priest “delegates” a lay person, preferably a female to give the homily! Needless to mention is the f act that laypeople distribute HOLY COMMUNION in the New Mass. Furthermore, singi ng in the choir during the pre-Vatican II era was so highly regarded as a Liturg ical office that it was absolutely forbidden for women to be part of the choir; “only men of known piety and probity of life” were “to be admitted to form part of the choir of a church”.43 There is also the case of the “Prayer of the Faithf ul”. Is the Mass not the solemn unbloody Sacrifice of JESUS CHRIST on Calvary of fered by the priest as a mediator between GOD and man? Why the clericalisation o f the laity? This does not happen in the Mass of Saint Pius V but in the New Mas s, virtually anything goes. The more conservative clerics have the prayers read by the faithful while the progressives allow them to “freestyle” according to th eir fancy, now beginning with “choruses” and/or “IN THE NAAAAAME OF JESUS”! And so on and so forth, according to the spirit of improvisation. Unbelievable! Lang uage is another one of the gray areas of the New Mass. In the Tridentine Mass, t he Liturgical language is Latin.44 Logically and understandably, the homily is g iven in a language that the congregation understands even if it is vernacular.45 In the New Mass however, we have all kinds of permutations and combinations for the Liturgical texts: English; vernacular; English and vernacular; English and Latin; English, vernacular and Latin; English and “Speaking in tongues”; English , “tongues” and vernacular; vernacular and “tongues”; vernacular, “tongues” and Latin; and so on and so forth. Moreover, the position of the priest and of the f aithful is another fundamental flaw of the New Mass. In the Tridentine Mass, the priest and the people face the altar or rather GOD on the altar; while in the N ew Mass, the priest faces the people and they in turn face the altar or rather t he priest on the altar. There is no need to ask where this leaves GOD, WHO is s upposed to be the primary focus of the Mass. Also, the priest has specific gestu res and postures at different parts of the altar and in the sanctuary where he s ays the various prayers of the Mass. Furthermore, the faithful have specific pos itions to assume at various parts of the Mass, for example the official position during COMMUNION and when receiving the final blessing of the priest with the l ast sign of the cross is kneeling. These are still being observed in the Trident ine Mass but in the New Mass, a lot of people do not even know these. Another pr oblem with the New Mass is that it places undue emphasis on the Bible in contras t to the Traditional which gives the Bible its due reference. The world was crea ted by GOD and not by the Bible. HE sent JESUS CHRIST not the Bible to save the world. The Bible was not crucified on the cross for us; it was our LORD JESUS CH RIST WHO shed HIS Blood for us. On Pentecost, the Apostles were commissioned to begin the spread of the Catholic Church by the HOLY SPIRIT and not by the Bible. The Bible as we have it today was formally approved by Pope Saint Boniface I in the fifth century after series of Councils. Meanwhile before then, she had bloo med amidst eight major persecutions apart from the ones in Jerusalem in the time of the Apostles! The Church made the Bible and not vice-versa. The Mass is all about the HOLY TRINITY and not all about the Bible. All the parts of the Mass in cluding the readings point to this immutable truth. In the Tridentine Mass there are always only three readings: Epistle, Gospel and the last Gospel. In the Nov us Ordo Mass sometimes there are three: First Reading, Responsorial Psalm and th e Gospel; sometimes four: First Reading, Responsorial Psalm, Second Reading and the Gospel; and on Easter Vigils there are sixteen readings! It is under such an d similar misconceptions that priests insist that those who miss the readings ar e automatically disqualified from receiving COMMUNION. Finally, some of the tran slations in the New Mass are erroneous. For example the response to “Dominus vob iscum” (“The Lord be with you”) is “Et cum spiritu tuo” (“And with your spirit”) ; but in the New Mass, the response is translated into “And also with you”! Than ks to the International Committee on English in the Liturgy or rather the Intern ational Committee on Error in the Liturgy (ICEL). Enough has been said about the loopholes of Bugnini’s caricature of a Mass and its consequent too numerous to mention manifestations of diabolical disorientation. Let us proceed with a compa
rison of the parts of the Mass in the Traditional Missal to those of the New Mis sal starting at the very beginning: Asperges Me In the Traditional Missal the priest prepares the faithful for the Mass by sprin kling them with holy water along with chanting of the Asperges me Domine and pra yers. This has been removed from the New Missal but as an alternative to the Kyr ie later on, the priest blesses holy water and “sprinkles himself, his ministers and the people” while “an appropriate song is sung.” “An appropriate song”? Lik e the National Anthem? Water no get enemy? Send down the rain? Rain, rain, go a way? By the rivers of Babylon? Koli water? Rainy dayz? Waterfalls? It’s raining men? Cry me a river? I can’t stand the rain? Quiet storm? Make it rain? Water ru ns dry? How can a “song” be appropriate in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass? What a ridiculous ambiguity! Why not appropriate hymn or psalm? Is there any excuse t o justify a song being appropriate in the Mass? And to think that this is made a n alternative to the Kyrie. What does sprinkling of holy water with singing an “ appropriate song” have to do with “LORD, have mercy on us”? So much for the Kyri e’s “substitute”, now back to the New Missal’s edited preparatory Asperges me. I n place of it in the New Order Missal however, the priest “greets all present”! Greetings in the Mass? Incredible! Talk about the secularization of the Solemn S acrifice. So the Mass has become another function that begins with the exchange of pleasantries? Michael Ghisleri will not believe this! Sign of the Cross Fortunately, in both Missals the Mass begins with the sign of the cross. However , the sign of the cross appears over thirty times in the Traditional Missal wher eas in the New Order Missal apart from in the beginning and in the end of the Ma ss, the only place where the sign of the cross appears is in the “optional” Rite of Blessing and Sprinkling Holy Water. The sign of the cross does not even appe ar during the consecration of bread and wine in any of the four Eucharistic Prayers of the New Missal’s Mass!!! Any priest making the sign of the cross over bread and wine to effect transubstantiation is in effect using his initiative!!! Amazing! Still, we keep offering and hearing this Mass from d ay to day, week to week, month to month, year to year, decade to decade but GOD forbid, century to century. Confiteor The two Missals contain the Confiteor but they are totally different. In the Tri dentine Missal confession is made to GOD, Mary, Saints Michael, John the Baptist , Peter, Paul, all the saints and the priest. The priest then does an absolution after this. In the Novus Ordo Missal confession is made to GOD and to the congr egation but there is no absolution!!! Whatever happened to John XX: 22, 23 and t he power to forgive sins? (Matthew IX: 2, 6) May it be taken for granted that it is well known that the power given by JESUS to HIS priests to absolve sins is g reater than the power HE used in creating the world? Introit The Introit which is in the Traditional Missal has been removed from the New Mis sal. Kyrie There is only one Kyrie in the Traditional Latin Missal and it has only one mean ing. In the New Order Missal on the other hand, there are three different Kyrie’ s and their translations are all inaccurate! “Kyrie, eleison” and “Christie, ele ison” are the Greek ways of saying “Lord, have mercy on us” and “Christ have mer cy on us” respectively, but they are translated in the New Missal without the “u s” as “Lord, have mercy”. Therefore, on whom is the mercy of GOD being invoked? Is it on the devil and his demons? Or is it on dancehall music, the sun, the moo n, animals, plants, the economy, the environment? This is unbelievable! Also in practice, the New Missal’s Kyrie along with its Gloria and Credo are very, very “remixable” with words that are not anywhere in the Missal. Imagine a Gloria whe
re a part says, “everybody shout alleluia”, and indeed everybody shouts, “Allelu ia”! What a catastrophe! Gradual The Gradual in the Traditional Missal has been removed from the New Missal. Offertory The prayers of the Offertory which begins the Mass of the Faithful in the Latin Missal have also been removed from the Liturgy of the Eucharist in the New Missa l except the Preface and the Orate, Fratres (“Pray, bretheren…”). And to these t wo have been added the deficient and dismal “Blessed are you LORD GOD of all cre ation…”, “By the mystery of this water and wine…” “LORD GOD, we ask you to recei ve us…” and “LORD, wash away my iniquity…” As a matter of fact, the word “offert ory” is used only once in the New Missal though ambiguously but in the New Mass it is synonymous with the collection of money before consecration. Secret This is a prayer that is said inaudibly by the priest as a mediator speaking dir ectly to GOD on behalf of man. This was removed by Bugnini of cursed memory and his cohorts for reasons best known to them. Gloria In the Tridentine Missal the sign of the cross appears before “in the glory of G od the Father” and the English translation is correct, but in the Novus Ordo the re is no sign of the cross and the English translation of the Latin version is d ifferent from what the Latin actually says. Once again we have the International Committee on Error in the Liturgy (ICEL) to thank for this “updated” translatio n. Furthermore, the Gloria is very “remixable” in the post-conciliar Church, for example one of the “remix” versions goes like this: Glory to GOD, glory to GOD, glory to the FATHER To HIM be glory forever Alleluia Amen, Alleluia Amen, Alleluia Amen! Glory to GOD, glory to GOD, SON of the FATHER To HIM be glory forever Alleluia Amen, Alleluia Amen, Alleluia Amen! Glory to GOD, glory to GOD, glory to the SPIRIT To HIM be glory forever Alleluia Amen, Alleluia Amen, Alleluia Amen! What will be the countenance of the angels and the saints when this and other “r emixes” are sung as part of the Mass? What a pity! Canon/Eucharistic Prayer The Canon covers the climax of the Holy Sacrifice where bread and wine are chang ed into the Body and Blood of our LORD, JESUS CHRIST. In the Traditional Missal the Canon has more signs of the cross than any other part of the Mass. Besides, there is just one Canon and the words of JESUS CHRIST to HIS Apostles in the Scr iptures that HIS Blood “shall be shed for you and for many” is used. The New Ord er Missal’s Eucharistic Prayer has no sign of the cross even during consecration in spite of having four different Eucharistic prayers!!! Moreover, the very pop ular Eucharistic prayer II does not mention the word “Sacrifice”!!! What is more , the words of JESUS CHRIST to his Apostles that HIS Blood “shall be shed for yo u and for many” have been changed to “will be shed for you and for all men”!!! “ For you and for all men”? Including the damned in Hell? If the Blood of CHRIST w as shed for all men, then what are men doing in Hell? Not even the sixteenth cen tury arch-heretics like Zwingli, Calvin or Cranmer dared this. Besides, the 1966 , 1967 and 1968 editions of the Jerusalem Bible, which is the Bible of this Miss
al’s Liturgical readings does not contain this error, neither does Good News nor even the Wycliffe, Lutheran, New World Translation (“Jehovah’s” Witness) nor Ki ng James . This assertion stands to be corrected but there is no bible in the wo rld that says “for you and for all men”. Where then is this distortion from? Thi s is absolute satanic manipulation! Horrendous! Unacceptable! The International Committee on Error in the Liturgy (ICEL) and their cohorts owe time and eternity a great deal of explanation for this. Rejoinders are welcome from anyone with a bible that says “for you and for all men”. Our FATHER The Our FATHER and the subsequent Prayer of Deliverance from Evil in the New Mis sal are followed by the Protestant “For the kingdom, the power, and the glory ar e yours, now and forever.” How ecumenistic! Sign of Peace??? After the Our FATHER and the Prayer of Deliverance from Evil, the New Missal unl ike the Traditional says that “All make a sign of peace according to local custo m”. Now hold on a minute! What if the sign of peace in local custom demands roll ing on the floor, doing as many pushups as possible, frog jumps, hopping on one foot or sharing a keg of palm wine? On June 13, 1929 at Tuy in Spain, Our Lady i n the presence and with the authority of the BLESSED TRINITY through Lucy of Fat ima asked the Pope and all his bishops to consecrate Russia by name simultaneous ly to Her Immaculate Heart if they wanted peace for themselves and for the world , otherwise there will be World War II and other wars, persecution of the Church and of the Pope, spreading of errors by Russia, annihilation of nations and the danger of a similar misfortune to that which befell King Louis XVI of France be falling the Pope and his bishops. This has not been done but the Missal of the M ass of all Ages could be criminally suppressed in 1970 in favour of a Missal in whose Mass the faithful are asked to “make a sign of peace according to local cu stom”. When will the nightmare eventually end? World War II has come and gone le aving devastation in its wake and there have been other wars of which some have not ended. But with World War III on the horizon, the Pope and all his bishops h ave to save the world from the impending catastrophe by simultaneously consecrat ing Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary as GOD has requested. This war which will definitely be spearheaded by Russia seems likely to begin during or around the period of a transition, if not the one from Pope Benedict XVI to his success or, then a future one (remember World War I and World War II started around the transition from Pius X to Benedict XV and from Pius XI to Pius XII respectively - déjà vu!) and it will be far worse than World War I and World War II. It is in it that “nations will be annihilated” because it will definitely assume a nucle ar scale but like our LORD assured Lucy, “It will never be too late to have reco urse to JESUS and Mary”. But if the requirement for world peace is a simple con secration of Russia by the Pope and all his bishops simultaneously to the Immacu late Heart of Mary, then what is preventing them from obeying GOD. There has t o be more to this than meets the eye certainly. Pre-Communion Prayers In the Tridentine Missal the priest prepares for COMMUNION with the Prayers for Fidelity and for the Life-giving Bread, the Communion and the “Lord I am not wor thy…” which is said three times. The faithful on their part prepare themselves w ith the Confiteor (not Novus Ordo type) and then an absolution by the priest. Th ey then respond to the Ecce Agnus Dei (“Behold the Lamb of God, behold Him, who takes away the sins of the world.”) said by the priest with the “Lord I am not w orthy…” three times like the priest. Furthermore, while distributing COMMUNION, the priest says, “May the Body of our Lord Jesus Christ preserve your soul unto life everlasting. Amen.” (All the communicant does is to open their mouth and re ceive JESUS on their tongue) However, in the New Missal the Prayer for Fidelity, Prayer for the Life-giving Bread and the priest’s Communion have been rolled up into one prayer with two versions of not up to ten lines. Worse still, the prie st does not say the “Lord I am not worthy…” not even once!! The people on the ot
her hand say it once on the priest’s invitation with “This is the Lamb of God wh o takes away the sins of the world. Happy are those who are called to his supper ”. That is all for them as far as preparation for COMMUNION is concerned. The Ma ss is Calvary continued, the Mass is worth as much as the Sacrifice of JESUS CHR IST’S life, sufferings and death, the Mass is the most powerful atonement for ou r sins and according to Saint Pio of Pietrelcina, the world could exist more eas ily without the sun than without the Mass! The Mass is neither a supper nor a di nner nor a luncheon nor a buffet. But with this kind of New Missal preparation o r the lack of it for the CREATOR of the world, is it then surprising that in the New Mass, clergy and laity have no qualms of conscience about receiving JESUS C HRIST in a state of mortal sin, in the hand, standing; also half naked, indecent ly dressed, unveiled and in trousers for women in particular, etc. People actual ly swagger and swing their arms to and from COMMUNION! It seems a time will come that is if it has not started happening already when we will take calls on our mobiles while receiving COMMUNION or dance to and from COMMUNION. What a tragedy !!! Moreover, the Missal has it that the priest says “The body of Christ” as the “communicant is offered the host” and the communicant says “Amen”. But it goes further; the priest also says “blood of Christ”, “when the communicant is offere d the chalice”. So COMMUNION under both kinds has become an ordinary part of the Mass? Incredible! One cannot help but recall the ominous message of our LORD to Mary-Julie Jahenny of La Fraudais at the beginning of the twentieth century: I give you a warning. The disciples who are not of My Gospel are now working har d to remake according to their ideas, and under the influence of the enemy of so uls, a Mass that contains words which are odious in My Sight. When the fatal hou r arrives where the faith of my priest is put to the test, it will be these text s that will be celebrated, in this second period. The first period is the one of My Priesthood, existing since Me. The second is t he one of the persecution, when the enemies of the Faith and of Holy Religion wi ll impose their formulas in the book of the second celebration. Many of My holy priests will refuse this book, sealed with the words of the abyss. Unfortunately , amongst them are those who will accept it. The Last Gospel In the Traditional Missal the Mass ends with a Gospel reading but this has been removed from the Novus Ordo Missal. The Leonine Prayers In the Tridentine Missal after Low Mass, three Hail Mary’s, the Hail Holy Queen, a prayer for the conversion of sinners and for the liberation of the Church and the Prayer to Saint Michael are said. This practice was instituted by Pope Leo XIII after he saw a vision in 1884 of a future battle between the powers of Hell and those of Heaven over the Catholic Church. These prayers are all presently r eferred to as the Prayer for the Conversion of Russia. The terms “Low Mass” and “High Mass” do not even appear in the New Missal let alone the Leonine prayers; however in practice, some faithful say the Catena Legions after the New Mass. Th ough the saying of the Catena is pious in itself, these faithful should know tha t it is the Leonine prayers that were decreed to be said after Low Mass. Moreove r, the difference between a High and a Low Mass is that a High Mass is sung whil e a Low Mass is recited. Other than that, no prayer of the Mass is omitted: ever y other thing is the same. In the Vatican II “new dispensation”, the terms “Low Mass” and “High Mass” are never used but the Gloria is omitted in most weekday M asses. REASONS FOR THE DIABOLICAL DISORIENTATION The instances of diabolical disorientation, which has affected every one in the world including the writer of this article, can be observed by anyone who really wants to but how did this come about? Indeed all the ink and paper of the worl
d will not be enough to tell the story but a run down of the bare essentials wil l suffice presently. Before the creation of the world, lucifer fell out with GOD because he was too proud to accept GOD’S predicted subjection of angels to JESU S and Mary. A war (Apocalypse XII: 7) ensued and his fellow rebel angels and he were expelled from Heaven and condemned to Hell. Ultimately, an everlasting enmi ty sprung up between GOD and the dragon, who vowed to topple GOD and take over H IS Kingdom. This, coupled with his malice led to his tempting of Eve and the sub sequent fall of her husband and her. His apparent victory was however short-live d as it suffered a major setback with the life, death and resurrection of JESUS CHRIST a mere four thousand years later. To top it off, the Institution (Catholi c Church) , which HE set up on Earth as the Ark of Salvation for souls who want to go to Heaven was also a perpetual stumbling block to satan achieving his fool ish and unrealistic goal of conquering GOD and taking over Heaven because in ord er to conquer Heaven, he has to vanquish Earth first. To do this, the world has to be absolutely corrupt, but as long as the Church exists, this is impossible; what with the Mass, Saints, Sacraments, dogmas, Tradition, devotions, exorcisms, Orders, Popes, priests, nuns, Sanctifying grace, monasteries, etc. This leaves lucifer with the option of eliminating the Church but CHRIST had already promise d that the gates of Hell shall not prevail against HIS Church. So, in spite of t he persecutions, heresies, schisms, proliferation and distortion of religion, po isoning of the agents of socialization, corruption of civilization, multiplicity of sects and all the other manifestations of anti-Catholicism, the Church still stood, as our LORD promised. So what does the serpent do? How then can he corru pt the world enough to enable him incarnate as man to conquer the Earth and subs equently, Heaven just as JESUS CHRIST incarnated as MAN to conquer him, sin, the world, death and Hell? He works harder and harder with his attacks as against t he followers of CHRIST who gradually become less vigilant and virtually leave th e field of battle entirely to him and among other things, he creates an illusory diversion, a “Church” within the Church, a virtual Church, a Church that is not actually there, a diabolical disorientation: the New Church! CONSEQUENCES OF DIABOLICAL DISORIENTATION Among the consequences of diabolical disorientation is Diabolical Disorientation Syndrome (DDS) which is characterised among others by a massive loss of the sen se of sin, high level of ignorance especially in matters of Salvation, drastic d ecline in the Church’s Militancy and Orthodoxy, false obedience, complacency, se rvility, false sense of security, progress and enlightenment especially among cl erics, fear of the unknown, timidity, indifferentism, discouragement, etc. The C hurch is basically divided into the Triumphant in Heaven, the Militant on Earth and the Suffering in Purgatory. The warfare with the prince of darkness is done by the first two. Those who emerge victorious in the Church Militant are elevate d to the Church Triumphant from where they battle more gloriously. Those who los e to the devil are captured by him and damned to Hell like him while those in Pu rgatory have to be purified for Heaven because they neither merit Heaven nor des erve Hell. Whether in eternity we will be condemned to Hell or purified in Purga tory before going to Heaven or elevated to glory in Heaven immediately after dea th depends on how guilty or not we are of sin but we don’t seem to remember that sin is the worst tragedy that can befall anyone, infinitely worse than full blo wn AIDS, mutation, bankruptcy, holocaust or any disaster or combination of disas ters that anyone can think of. Sin has become so institutionalized in our time t hat it seems to be sinful to stay away from sin and the occasions of sin. A war is going on: the Battle of the Ages. The beginning of this war is the reference of Apocalypse XII: 7. In order to survive the war in the Militant Church, it is important to know that there is a war going on in the first place and how to fig ht it. It is just as if a man who is about to travel from town A through town B to town C gets information that a deadly war is raging on in town B. He will eit her make a detour or get himself more secure if he is still to travel by the war -torn town B route. Whatever might be the case, he will not travel through town B as if there was no war in it otherwise he will get hurt, killed, captured or i
nto some kind of trouble. That is one of the major problems with the Church Mili tant today. We are swimming in tremendous ignorance about our Faith and ignoranc e does not entirely eliminate our culpability. For example many Catholics today do not know about the public prophetic Message of Fatima and the obligation it i mposes on the Church even though we all suffer the consequences. GOD on his part has provided us and keeps providing us with the means not just to fight but to fight and win. Therefore the only ones to blame for our failure are we. We have allowed our inclinations to rule us like Adam and Eve, hence the devil has taken advantage of us. We have forgotten that just as we were conceived and born afte r nine months, we will also die and be judged and then be sent to Heaven or Hell . We live in the flesh to the detriment of our souls. We have been diabolically disoriented. We are abnormally attached to life. When was the last time we witne ssed or heard of someone dying in the odor of sanctity or dying after receiving VIATICUM? When was the last time we flocked to the grave of some recently deceas ed Catholic to witness and experience genuine miracles? What happened to the tim es when members of the Church Militant resisted erroneous, heretical or scandalo us clerics like Saint Paul did to Saint Peter the first Pope for his failure to uphold the Catholic dogma that the Jewish law of circumcision was absolutely obs olete (Galatians II: 11-14), or like the lawyer Eusebius did to Archbishop Nesto rius for his denial of Mary’s Divine Motherhood, or like Saint John Gaulbert who in order to expose the simoniacal archbishop of Florence was permitted by GOD t o make one of his monks walk through a huge bonfire without being burnt, or like the theologians and Cardinal Orsini did to Pope John XXII for his error on the time of the beatific vision after death or like Saint Anthony of Padua did to Ge neral Elias for his shameful attempt to relax the Franciscan rule or like Saint Robert Bellarmine, the Doctor who taught: "Just as it is licit to resist the Pontiff that aggresses the body, it is also l icit to resist the one who aggresses the souls or who disturbs civil order, or, above all, who attempts to destroy the Church. I say that it is licit to resist him by not doing what he orders and preventing his will from being executed; it is not licit, however, to judge, punish or depose him, since these are acts prop er to a superior."46 What has happened to those radical repentances that always ended in Heaven like those of Saint Paul, Saint Augustine, Saint Francis of Assisi, Saint Margaret of Cortona, Saint John Capistran, Saint Ignatius de Loyola, Saint Camillus de Lell is, Saint Elizabeth Seton, Venerable John Henry Newman, Marie-Alphonse Ratisbonn e, Venerable Matt Talbot, Blessed Charles de Foucauld, Eve Lavalliere, Saint Ter esa Benedicta, Blessed Teresa of Calcutta, etc. What has happened to the Saints that used to emerge every now and then to blaze the trail to Heaven? Was it not in this same world, breathing the same air we now breathe that lived people like Saint Aloysius Gonzaga who in order to keep his purity intact swore never to lo ok any woman in the face including his own mother; or nuns like Saint Gertrude t he Great who was so virtuous that she is the only woman in history presently sur named “the Great”; or priests like Blessed Damien of Molokai who became a leper in the process of bringing JESUS CHRIST to a leper colony? Where are the Saints of our times? Why are we having a scarcity of sanctity or is GOD no longer WHO H E is? Are we not diabolically disoriented? “How are the valiant fallen” indeed? Have we forgotten that the world is passing away; that we are only pilgrims on e xile in a foreign land; that our journey is meant to end in Heaven where our bro thers and sisters await us? Brethren like Saint Peter Damian who was so humble t hat he had to be threatened with excommunication in order to accept the cardinal episcopates of Ostia and Velletri; Saint Charles Borromeo, the bishop who lived only forty-six years but accomplished more than many of his counterparts these days who live twice his age because he was more concerned with being a good bish op than being an aged one; Saint Stanislaus of Cracow, the illustrious martyr of Poland whom GOD enabled to raise a dead man to life in order to be his witness in a case where others had been silenced with bribe and intimidation; Saints Pat rick of Ireland, Francis of Paola and Bernadine of Sienna who raised dead people to life like no man’s business; Saint Benedict of Nursia who aside from foundin
g an Order that has given the Church more Popes than any other, exorcising a dem oniac with a punch, destroying a poisoned glass of wine with the sign of the cro ss among other stupendous miracles, died kneeling upright in order to return his soul back to his OWNER; Saint Francis de Sales who along with his relative conv erted a town of over seventy thousand heretics within four years; Saint John of Kanty who was so inflamed with the desire for martyrdom that he travelled to Jer usalem to preach to the Muslims there; Saint John Baptist Mary Vianney to who th e devil confessed that four priests living like him will annihilate the devil’s kingdom on Earth; Saint Odilo of Cluny who originated the All Souls Mass; Saint Leonard of Port-Maurice who originated the Stations of the Cross; Saint Bonavent ure who originated the Angelus; Saints Gemma Galgani and Frances of Rome who saw and interacted with their guardian angels regularly; and so on and so forth. Th ere was a time when friends promised each other in life that whoever died first will return to tell the other how they fared in eternity – and they always did! There was a time that the world witnessed supernatural manifestations during Mas s like priests levitating, getting transfigured, being surrounded by haloes, and so on. There was a time when bishops like Archbishop Joachim Pecci (later Pope Leo XIII) built thirty-six churches in a thirty-two year episcopate (1843-1875) and Saint John Nepomucene Newman built eighty churches during an eight year epis copate (1852-1860). To top it off, they did this with equally fruitful spiritual results and without turning their churches into marketsquares or selling JESUS CHRIST like Judas Iscariot. What about our brothers and sisters who abandoned we alth and position for the kingdom of GOD like Saints Gregory the Great, Bernard of Clairvaux, Francis of Assisi, Augustus Czartoryski, Teresa Valse Pantellini, Katherine Drexel, etc.? What about girls like Laura Vicuna and Maria Goretti who rather embraced martyrdom willingly than fornication? What about the congregati ons, lay groups and Orders that educated our children, led us on the path of tru e civilization, showered us with spiritual and corporal works of mercy and loved us until it hurt them: the Missionaries of Charity of Blessed Teresa of Calcutt a; the Order of Preachers and Confraternity of the Most Holy Rosary of Saint Dom inic Guzman; the Jesuits of Saint Ignatius Loyola; the Redemptorists of Saint Al phonsus de Liguori; the Congregation of Priests of the Missions of Saint Vincent de Paul; the Society of the SACRED HEART of Saint Madeline Sophie Barat; the Pa uline family of Blessed James Alberione; the Sisters of Providence of Saint Theo dore Guerin; the Pallottines of Saint Vincent Pallotti; the Society of Saint Vin cent de Paul of Blessed Frederick Ozanam; the Missionary Sisters of Saint Peter Claver of Blessed Mary Theresa Ledochowska; the Discalced Carmelites of Saint Te resa of Avila; the Good Shepherd Sisters of Saint Euphrasia Pelletier; the Helpe rs of the Holy Souls of Blessed Mary of Providence; the Society of the HOLY CHIL D JESUS of Venerable Cornelia Connelly; the Ursulines of Saint Angela Merici; th e Order of Friars Minor of Saint Francis of Assisi; the Order of Poor Clares of Saint Clare; the Salesians of Saint John Bosco, the Congregation of JESUS and Ma ry of Saint John Eudes; the BLESSED SACRAMENT Fathers of Saint Peter Julian Eyma rd; the Legion of Mary of Frank Duff; the Congregation of the Oratory of Saint P hilip Neri; the Society for the Propagation of the Faith and the Living Rosary of Venerable Pauline Jaricot; the Order of the Visitation of Saint Jane Frances de Chantal and Saint Francis de Sales; and so on and so forth. What about Saint Jeanne Jugan who loved the aged of Saint Servan in France so much with her Littl e Sisters of the Poor that in the year 1845, the Freemasons gave her a gold meda l!!? Where are the Charles Luwangas, the Andrew Kim Taegons, the Paul Mikis, the Maximilian Mary Kolbes, the Teresa Benedictas, the Miguel Pros, the Thomas Moor es, the martyrs of Rome and others who would not hesitate to shed their blood fo r the Catholic Faith when situation demanded it? Where are the Christians to ful fill the prophecy of JESUS that HIS followers will do greater works than HE did like Saint Seraphim of Sarov who transfigured and prayed for one thousand straig ht days among other prodigies; Saint Christine the Admirable (1150-1224) who die d in 1182, visited Heaven, Hell and Purgatory and resurrected to live on Earth, performing the most superhuman acts of penance for the souls she had seen in Pur gatory, which included those of whom she had known while they lived on Earth bef ore her final death forty-two years later; Saint Mary Magdalen de Pazzi, who use
d to go to Purgatory with our LORD to visit the Holy souls; Saint John Bosco who raised a boy from the dead in order to hear his confession before he died again ; Saint Herman Joseph who was so devoted to Mary that She put a ring on his fing er; Mother Agnes of JESUS who was so devoted to Mary that She put a chain of gol d around her neck; Venerable Mother Frances of the BLESSED SACRAMENT who was reg ularly visited by souls from Purgatory to ask for her prayers and thank her for her charity towards them; etc. What about the real super heroes, men and women whose everyday lives were more than extraordinary like Saint Pio the stigmatic w ho had the gifts of perfume, conversion, bilocation, healing, reading of hearts and prophecy; Mary-Julie Jahenny who lived for five straight years without eatin g or drinking; Saint Nicholas de Flue who lived on HOLY COMMUNION for the last t wenty years of his life; Therese Newman who among other stupendous miracles liv ed on HOLY COMMUNION for the last thirty-five years of her life; Saints Martin d e Porres and Rose of Lima who could communicate with animals among other prodigi es; Saint Joseph Cupertino who could fly; Saint Francis of Paola who was so infl amed with charity that he sometimes lit candles by touching them with his finger ; etc.? Where are the preachers that brought back souls to GOD in droves with th eir sermons and missions like Saint Anthony of Padua, Saint Louis-Marie de Montf ort, Saint Bernadine of Sienna, Saint John Eudes, Saint Vincent Ferrer, Mateo Bo evey-Crawley, Saint Lawrence of Brindisi, Saint James of the March, Saint John C apistran, Saint Francis Xavier, Saint Peter Fourier, Saint Nicholas of Tolentino , Saint Peter Canisius, Saint Francis di Girolamo, etc.? There was a time when e ntire families were venerated as Saints like those of Saints Basil the Elder (fa ther), Emelia (mother), Basil the Great (son), Gregory of Nyssa (son), Peter of Sebaste (son) and Macrina (daughter); Gregory the elder (father), Nonna (mother) , Gregory Nazianzen (son), Caesarius (son) and Gorgonia (daughter); Adalbald (fa ther), Rictrude (mother), Adalsind (daughter) , Clotsind (daughter), Eusebia (da ughter), and Mauront (son); Walbert (father), Bertilia (mother), Aldegundis (dau ghter) and Waldetrudis (daughter); Vincent Madalgarius (father), Waldetrudis (mo ther), Landericus (son), Dentelinius (son), Madelberta (daughter) and Aldetrudis (daughter). There was a time when parents were more than happy to have all thei r children in the religious or clerical life. There was a time when children wer e baptised a day after they were born, irrespective of whether their parents wou ld throw a party or not. There was a time when womanhood was free from feminism, careerism, birth control, abortion, family planning and contraception. A time w hen the Cornelia Cornellys, the Ritas of Cascia, the Bridgets of Sweden, the Eli zabeth Setons, the Louise de Marillacs, the Rose Hawthorne Lathrops, etc., glori fied womanhood with the rise from virginity in daughterhood, to motherhood, to widowhood, to religious life, to Sainthood! There was a time when Saints wrote b ooks that produced other Saints, masterpieces of Catholic literature like The Se cret of Mary, The Sinners Guide, The Book of Prayer and Meditation, Introduction to the Creed, Memorial of the Christian Life, The Interior Castle, The Imitatio n of Christ, The Catholic Controversy, Introduction to the Devout Life, The way of Perfection, Summa Theoligiae, True Devotion to Mary, The Dark Night of the So ul, City of God, Dialogue, Book of Considerations, The Secret of the Rosary, The Spiritual Exercise, The Mystical City of God, Confessions, De Controversiis, Th e Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Dignity and Duties of the Priest, E cclesiastical History of the English People, The Story of a Soul, The Way of Div ine of Love, etc. Whoever thought that a time will come when the Church hierarch y will no longer garrison the Faith with bastions like the Index of Forbidden Bo oks, the Oath against Modernism, the Code of Canon Law, the Autos de Fe, the Inq uisition, the Counterreformation, the Dogmatic Councils, the Lenten Sermons, the Catechism of the Council of Trent, the Crusades, the 30-day Ignatian Retreat, Dogmatic Proclamations, Popular Missions, Catholic Action, Excommunications, Int erdicts, the uncompromising, no-nonsense, never- missing-target, divine cannonba ll Papal Encyclicals (Mortalium Animos, Cantate Domino, Lamentabili Sane, Unam S anctam, Humanum Genus, Summo Iugiter, Mirari Vos, Singulari Quadem, Humani Gener is, Apostolicae Curae, Quanta Cura, Casti Connubii, Pascendi Dominici Gregis, Q ui Pluribus, Quod Apostolici mineris, Auctorem Fidei, Immortale Dei, etc.), Papa l Primacy, Sacred Music, Latin Language, etc.? Whoever thought that a time of d
iabolical disorientation of the magnitude of the one we are undergoing presently will come? It should be obvious by now to anyone who has been reading this arti cle without bias that the Church is in a crisis. There is an apostasy in the Cat holic Church: the Great Apostasy!!! This massive loss of Faith from clergy to la ity is fuelled to a large extent by the diabolical disorientation. As a matter o f fact, there has never been a time that we were as diabolically disoriented as we have been since the Second Vatican Revolution. ¬¬¬¬This unprecedented diaboli cal disorientation has also created unprecedented divisions within the Church. T hese divisions are three: the Mainstream, New Order, post-Vatican II or post-con ciliar or Vatican II Church; the Traditionalists, Traditional or pre-Vatican II Church and the false Traditionalists. The first category which is the Mainstream or New Order is where majority of Catholics are but unfortunately for this grou p, it is experiencing a perpetual error boom. Catholics in this category who wil l tell you that there is nothing wrong in the Church are either ignorant or a pa rt of the problem. Many people here are in the New Church, many are in good fait h, many are sleeping in sin, many are in denial, many will rather be wrong with the Pope than be right without him, some are silent, some like the FSSP have bee n silenced; and souls are falling left, right and centre: it is absolute carnage in this category! In this category “the fight is strongest.” This group can be loosely divided into those who are victims of the diabolical disorientation and those who are the propagators. Among the victims are those who believe that the Pope, cardinals, bishops, priests and clerics in authority must be obeyed no mat ter how false the obedience may be and that the clergy can never make mistakes; those who are totally ignorant; and so on. While the propagators are the clergy, hierarchy and laity who are being used by the devil to do his bidding. There ar e also another loose overlapping categories of left and right wings in this cate gory which are not mutually exclusive from the ones just previously mentioned, w ith the former leaning more towards modernism than the latter. It must be pointe d out that an intense battle is being fought here as GOD will never abandon his children and constantly fights to get them back. On the contrary, it is HIS chil dren who abandon HIM. The Mainstream can be compared to a possessed, crazy or ve ry sick person who badly needs to be exorcised or cured and not executed. That i s why GOD has favoured this category with apparitions more than any other. Chara cteristically, the ultimate end of all genuine apparitions is Heaven after death and Catholic Tradition while on Earth or as close to it as possible depending o n our response. What has GOD not done for us? Among other favors, HE has given u s the cure. HE has given and asked us to practice True Devotion to Mary; HE has asked the Pope and all his bishops to simultaneously consecrate Russia to the Im maculate Heart of Mary, HIS Daughter, Mother and Spouse but who is paying attent ion? Nobody!!! “Neither the good nor the bad” as bewailed by Sister Lucy to Fath er Augustine Fuentes fifty-three years ago. Nevertheless, there have also been o ccasional efforts by those in the Mainstream to offset the disorientation but t hese efforts have simply not been enough such as the various consecrations of Po pes Pius XII (1942, 1952 and 1954), Paul VI (1964) and John Paul II (1981, 1982, 1984, 2000); the infallible proclamation of John Paul II against the ordination of women priests in 1984; the liberation of the Tridentine Mass (which was neve r banned!) by Benedict XVI in 2007; the restoration of the Good Friday Prayer fo r the conversion of Jews in 2008 by the same Pope and the repeal of the absolut ely null and utterly void 1988 excommunication of the SSPX bishops by Benedict X VI in January 2009. But we still have a lot more to do and a very long way to go depending on how serious we are. The next category is that of the Traditionalis ts who are holding on to the Tradition of the Church in the event of a universal corruption like Saint Vincent of Lerins rightly advised. This is where the Cath olic Church including all her saints that we celebrate today was before the Seco nd Vatican tragedy. In this group we have the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), th e International Fatima Rosary Crusade (IFRC), the Fatima Movement of Priests (FM P), the Society of Saint John Vianney, etc. It is very difficult if not impossib le for someone in this category to be in the New Church but however, there is re latively minimal diabolical disorientation here compared to other divisions as c an be seen in those who do not see anything wrong in women wearing at least loos
e fitting trousers and other indecent dresses, misrepresentation in sacred pictu res and images, etc. Otherwise this category has every other thing in the right orientation and it is here and further that the Church will return eventually. T he third is a category of “Traditional Catholicism” which is a consequence of th e diabolical disorientation. Many people in this category if not all are also in the New Church. This group consists of those who believe among other heresies a nd absurdities that the gates of Hell have prevailed against Saint Peter’s Chair and his Rock, that no one should pray for the Pope, that the new Rites and Sacr aments are absolutely null and void, that every other person apart from them wil l go to Hell, that there is no such thing as Baptism of Desire and Baptism of Bl ood, etc. One cannot solve a problem that one is a part of. These guys in trying to provide a solution to the crisis have become worse than the problem they all egedly intend to solve. They do more harm than good to Catholic Tradition in the name of preserving it and are worse than their Mainstream counterparts in good faith who are making genuine efforts to save their souls and those of the people whom GOD places in their paths. They are also known as Sedevacantists and they are actually acting out either knowingly or unknowingly a script written by the devil, who has acknowledged through his minions in Permanent Instructions that “ the Pope, whoever he is, will never come to the secret societies…” How can they understand the situation better than the father of lies himself who is the proge nitor of the situation and who also knows that there is a limit to the extent of damage he can ever cause (Job 1:12)? This category like the Mainstream has peop le like Michael Dimond who also promote the false, ridiculous and untenable clai m that the Consecration of Russia as requested by Our Lady has been done. Furthe rmore, there is still a variation of the Sedevacantists which is just as prepost erous if not more. They are the Conclavists. They hold similar views with the Se devacantists but have gone further to elect their own various “Popes”, which is just fine by lucifer. Other “Traditionalists” with their various invented “tradi tions” also fall under this category of pseudo traditionalists. Ultimately, even though the devil intended the Catholic Church to be overrun and totally replace d by the New Church, his plan has not entirely worked and has failed to an exten t because our LORD has kept HIS promise that HE will be with us to the very end. Hence, the Catholic Faith is still very much alive and uncontaminated in Écône and wherever Traditional Catholicism is still practised. Écône has triumphed; sa tan may keep the churches and the Vatican for now but Écône keeps the Faith and after the Great Restoration via Our Lady’s Triumph, the Catholic Church will flo urish even more than it ever had before Vatican II and then all her Traditions a nd traditions will be universally restored in the most resplendent manner, inclu ding the practice of digging up and scattering the bodies and bones of heretics and of those who have tried to corrupt the Catholic religion.47 Besides, a lot o f people in the Mainstream and probably in the phoney Traditionalists are rather inadvertent co-operators with the demon. Many still hold on to traditions, prac tices and dogmas like abstinence on Fridays, “outside the Church there is no sal vation”, the Resurrection is no myth; JESUS CHRIST and scripture are historical and so on. But in truth, they can do better and the destruction of this New Chur ch in which many of them have fallen into depends on their cooperation with GOD just as its establishment needed cooperation with the dragon from among them. This leads us to another consequence of the diabolical disorientation which is G OD’S efforts to bring us back. But it must nevertheless be pointed out that thes e divisions are based on the practices being carried out within them and are not premeditated isolated factions per se but rather results of the various reactio ns to the Vatican II debacle. A similarity can be seen in the various reactions of JESUS’ disciples and the inhabitants of Israel to the events of Holy Thursday and Good Friday. Essentially, due to the Second Vatican Revolution, the Mainstr eam has drifted to the extreme right and the fake Traditionalists have drifted t o the extreme left but the Traditionalists have remained unmoved. Also, these ca tegories are somewhat dynamic and sometimes overlapping in nature hence a Tradit ionalist priest like Father Nicholas Gruner agrees with a Mainstream nun like Mo ther Angelica that the Vatican did not release the whole of the Third Secret as instructed; Bishop Fellay and late Pope John Paul II agree that the Consecration
has not been done, though the latter was more cryptic about this; Michael Davie s (Traditionalist) of blessed memory and Blessed Teresa of Calcutta (Mainstream ) abhor COMMUNION in the hand. In the long run, one is ultimately against CHRIS T or for CHRIST and it is HE alone WHO has the final say. HE knows those who are truly HIS in all the divisions in the present day Church. At any rate, it is qu ite strikingly alarming at the minority of Catholics who have the tendency to mo ve in the right direction against all odds. For example in all of the over one t housand, five hundred parishes of Nigeria’s fifty dioceses and two vicariates, i t is only one parish in one diocese, the FSSP-run Our Lady, Mother of Perpetual Help “extraordinary rite” Parish in Orlu diocese that has anything close to Trad itional Catholicism. What is more, it had been only a Mass centre since 2001 whe n it was first inaugurated until 2007 when it was raised to parish status! Now t o consider another consequence of the diabolical disorientation; this is the unp recedented level of divine intervention in our time. GOD, WHO will never forsake HIS children, keeps beckoning us back to HIMSELF through HIS prophets like HE d id before the Israelites’ exile in Babylon (2 Paralipomenon XXXVI: 14-23, DouayRheims) . Since the Fatima apparitions, there has been an unparalleled explosion of apparitions, visionaries, messages, revelations, miracles, bleeding statues, bleeding crucifixes, prodigies, etc., in our time than in any other era in hist ory. Worthy of note is the fact that most of these phenomena are concentrated in the Mainstream Catholic Church where “the fight is strongest” as has already be en pointed out. Unfortunately, they are being passed over in silence like that o f Fatima and even when these messages are being listened to, the instructions ar e not carried out as they should. However, all the authentic ones from Fatima ti ll date like the ones of old, urgently calls all to sincere repentance and amend ment of lives otherwise we are headed for disaster. The meltdown in countries wi th industrialized economies, which might just be a prelude to the Third World Wa r, is an apt example (Remember that the 1907 financial panic-inspired economic c rises preceded World War I and the 1929 stock market crash-inspired Great Depres sion preceded World War II - déjà vu!). The authenticity of such phenomena is ex clusively left for the Church’s Ordinary and Universal Magisterium to ascertain but in truth, those who are having a hard time distinguishing between the fake a nd the real ones should remember that the reality has actually never changed. On this note, it should be important to be wary of the misleading characteristics of a “true” message or visionary as given by heretical websites like the pro-Mas onic, pro-NFP www.catholicplanet.com because among other heresies, it obstinate ly maintains that Mary is not the Mediatrix of all graces!!!48 A true prophecy/m essage is not judgemental. It does not contradict scriptures. It does not contra dict Faith and Morals. It does not contradict Tradition. It does not separate th e SACRED HEART of JESUS and the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Neither it nor its bea rer, either by example or otherwise encourages disobedience. The intelligent but beleaguered Pope Paul VI must have anticipated the barrage of divine interventi on that will follow the Second Vatican Revolution when he revised the Code of Ca non Law only a year after the Council to initiate the so-called “springtime” end ed. No one should expect GOD to sit back and watch the devil attempt to make min cemeat of HIS Church after “its windows were opened to let in some air” that tur ned out to be an “invasion of worldly thinking.” Thus, on November 15, 1966, Can ons 1399 and 2318 (which had prohibited and penalized the publication of any mat erial concerning any apparitions whether approved or not without beforehand obta ining a bishop’s imprimatur) were abolished thereby allowing publications about new appearances, revelations, miracles, apparitions, etc., to be believed, read and distributed by the faithful without express permission of the Church, provid ed they contain nothing, which contravened faith and morals. Another consequence of diabolical disorientation is the systematic de-Christianization of the world . This can be traced even beyond the Second Vatican Revolution to the satan-insp ired evils called the age of “enlightenment” (the true meaning of this “enlighte nment” is Masonic dominance and naturalistic madness!) and the French Revolution when the error of the separation of the Church and state started to take root. The Church has always met this threat head-on and had even kept it in check, but with the Second Vatican Revolution, the Church was dealt a mortal blow and seem
s to have buckled. Nowadays, the error of the separation of the Church and state seems to be the foundation for making decisions in non-ecclesiastical and even ecclesiastical matters. Laws, governments, constitutions, establishments, instit utions, agreements, treaties, organisations, etc., are made with absolute disreg ard for GOD and HIS Laws and characteristically, the fruits so far have been any thing but positive. Take for example the ostensible search for peace by that “br ood of vipers” known as United Nations. They have actually succeeded in deceivin g whoever they can that they can attain peace without GOD. Isn’t it laughable? H ow can there be peace without the PRINCE of peace? How many of the individual na tions that make up the United Nations have peace? How many of the individuals th at make up these nations have interior peace? How can a man give what he has not ? How can we be so blind? It will be much easier for a billion camels to pass th rough half the eye of a needle than to attain world peace without GOD. Those who believe that the UN sincerely wants peace might as well believe in aliens and f lying saucers, dinosaurs, vampires, zombies, werewolves, genies, tooth fairies, leprechauns, elves, Pinocchio, Cinderella, Snow White, bogeyman, mermaids, Bigfo ot, Lady Koi-Koi, etc. Otherwise, they should objectively study the UN’s conduct before, during and after the 1994 Rwandan genocide. If the UN and their suppor ters truly want peace, let them ask the Pope and all his bishops to obey GOD’S 1 929 request and simultaneously consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary and even they will be surprised at the result. If on the contrary the Consecrat ion does not bring peace, then everyone is free to believe that GOD truly does n ot exist. This is a challenge to the entire world’s governments who do not seem to take the following admonition of Pius XI seriously: How can any contract be maintained, and what value can any treaty have, in which every guarantee of conscience is lacking? And how can there be talk of guarante es of conscience when all faith in God and all fear of God have vanished? Take away this basis, and wi th it all moral law falls, and there is no remedy left to stop the gradual but i nevitable destruction of peoples, families, the State, civilization itself.49 THE SOLUTION TO DIABOLICAL DISORIENTATION After all is said and done, what is the ultimate solution to this illusory menac e called diabolical disorientation that has plagued the world in a way that has never been witnessed since Vatican II? The answer, True Devotion to Mary!!! That is pretty much all. Our Lady confirmed this to the children of Fatima on Wednes day, June 13, 1917 with the following words: JESUS wishes to use you [Lucy] in making Me known and loved. He wishes to spread in the world Devotion to My Immaculate Heart. I promise salvation to those who embrace this devotion. Their souls will be loved by GOD with a love of predilection, like flowers place d by Me before HIS throne.50 Who does not want to be like a flower placed by Mary before GOD? Will it not be foolish to let this opportunity pass one by? This Devotion was perfectly laid ou t by Saint Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort in his mystical master piece, True D evotion to Mary before his death in 1716, two hundred years before Saint Michael started preparing the children of Fatima for the Apparition of all apparitions in the following year. One problem is that the devil also tries to prevent the s pread of this priceless Devotion like when he hid the book about this Devotion f or a hundred and twenty-six years after the death of the author. However, there are three vital things to bear in mind when applying this solution: one must not leave out any of its practices no matter how insignificant it may seem; one mus t allow the devotion to rule one’s life and one must persevere in all the practi ces of the Devotion forever. There is certainly more to this Devotion than appe
nding “Mary” to one’s name. So, the first thing to do is to study True Devotion to Mary by Saint Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort thoroughly and then adopt fore ver its practices viz.: Exterior Practices 1. CONTEMPT OF AND FLIGHT FROM THE WORLD 2. THE WEARING OF LITTLE CHAINS 3. PREPARATORY EXERCISES AND CONSECRATION 4. RECITAION OF THE LITTLE CROWN OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN 5. SPECIAL DEVOTION TO THE MYSTREY OF THE INCARNATION 6. DEVOTION TO THE BROWN SCAPULAR OF OUR LADY OF MOUNT CARMEL 7. DEVOTION TO THE HAIL MARY AND TO THE ROSARY 8. DEVOTION TO THE MAGNIFICAT 9. PENANCE 10. DEVOTION OF THE FIRST FIVE SATURDAYS Even though the Brown Scapular does not appear in the final exterior practices o f the book, it was mentioned by Saint Louis de Montfort in number 116 as an exte rior practice of the Devotion and was confirmed by Our Lady on October 13, 1917 in Fatima when She appeared fully clothed in the habit and held out one to the w orld. Also, the practice of penance was personally added by Our Lady of Fatima H erself on Sunday 19th of August in the same year with the following words: “Pray, pray very much, and make sacrifices for sinners; for many souls go to hel l, because there are none to sacrifice themselves and to pray for them.”51 Furthermore, the Devotion of the First Five Saturdays was added to the practices by Our Lady in Pontevedra, Spain on December 10, 1925 in fulfilment of the prom ise She made on October 13, 1917 to the children as regards reparation to her Im maculate Heart and the prevention of the Second World War and other catastrophes .52 Not less important and equally easy for a true devotee of Mary to understan d and appreciate is the request made by the HOLY TRINITY through Mary on Thursda y, 13th of June, 1929 in Tuy, Spain to Sister Lucy of Fatima while she was doing the Gethsemani hour. It was received and delivered by her and it said that if t he Pope and all his bishops should simultaneously consecrate Russia to the Immac ulate Heart of Mary, there will be peace in the world for a definite period of t ime. If not, there will be World War II and other wars including the one in whic h “various nations will be annihilated;” not to mention the persecution of the P ope and of the Catholic Church. Furthermore, after failing to carry out the requ est for two years, our LORD came again to Sister Lucy in August, 1931 in Rianjo, Spain and gave her this message for the Pope and the bishops: “Make it known to MY ministers that given that they follow the example of the Ki ng of France in delaying the execution of MY command, they will follow him into misfortune…” The King of France was asked by our LORD through Saint Margaret Mary Alacoque on June 17, 1689 to consecrate France to the SACRED HEART of JESUS during the reig n of Louis XIV but he failed to do so and so did his successors for a hundred ye ars and on June 17, 1789, the French Revolution broke out; the Freemasons stripp ed Louis XVI of his authority, imprisoned him and eventually executed him on the guillotine four years later! Was that not an avoidable tragedy? What do we real ly have to lose? The worst scenario is that if the Consecration does not bring t he much desired peace, we will be ridiculed and then nobody will ever talk about it. But the devil knows that this can never be the case, hence he has been pre venting the Consecration both from within and without the Church. Meanwhile the failure to carry out this Consecration has allowed Russia and her accomplices to continue their preparation for World War III in earnest. The scenario of this W ar is not what anyone would want to experience even in their worst nightmare. Hi roshima and Nagasaki will be situation comedies compared to the disasters of thi s War. What the Nazis did to their captives and concentration camp prisoners dur ing World War II pales significantly in comparison to what is in store for Catho lics in this War. Worse still is the probable eternal fate of the War’s fataliti es, for instance almost all the people that died as a result of World War II wen t to Hell according to Blessed Jacinta Marto!!!53 A little digression will be ne
cessary in order to consider the rate at which we go to Hell. The MASTER HIMSELF has said it that few people make it to Heaven. Now on August 20, 1153, Saint Be rnard died, and a holy anchorite who had also died at the same time with Saint B ernard, appeared to the Bishop of Langres and told him that 30,000 had died at t he same time. He and Saint Bernard went straight to Heaven, 3 had to undergo Pur gatory before Heaven and the rest went to Hell!!! 5 out of 30,000 will give us a ratio of 1:6000 for those saved to those damned. That means that less than 1% o f all who died at that time went to Heaven. Let us consider also that Saint Bern ard’s times were far better than our times. Then, Christianity was a synonym for Catholicism, it was either you were a Catholic or you were not a Christian; abo rtion was not even an individual policy let alone national or global policy; it was the era of the Crusades, Popes did not pray in mosques and synagogues; there were rarely public prophetic apparitions like Paray le Monial, La Salette or Fa tima because the Inquisition did not allow the synagogue of satan to flourish w ith man-made cataclysmic tragedies like world wars and revolutions (including Va tican II) or babelian fiascos like the UN or New World Order; there were no weap ons of mass corruption like Hustler, Playboy, Penthouse, Channel E!, etc.; then, no how matter bad the Popes were, nobody tampered with the Liturgy; ecumenical councils categorically condemned errors and dogmatically restated Catholic doctr ines, they did not do the opposite and claim to be pastoral; the scenario of the priesthood swarming with sodomites and paedophiles whose punishments were to be transferred from diocese to diocese by their bishops was simply one of lucifer’ s favourite fantasies; heretics were either rehabilitated or prosecuted and not invited to partake in the preparation of ecumenical councils; the Church taught everybody, the Church did not dialogue with anybody; converts were warmly welcom ed and not rejected in order not to damage “diplomatic” relations between the Va tican and Communists or between the Vatican and Orthodox communities; then, poli tical correctness meant doctrinal correctness; procreation in marriage was not o ptional; people did not change their genders; then, in the 12th century, the wor d “gay” meant happy and not “homosexual”; prostitution then, was not as glorifie d as it is today, at least none of the prostitutes shamelessly paraded their nak ed bodies before the world in the name of modelling or “beauty” contests; laws w ere based on Catholic principles and not against them; governments did not try t o force bishops to marry – then, the gate to Heaven should be certainly more cro wded than it presently is. One could go on and on but suffice it to say that our age is the worst since the beginning of the world unparalleled by no other exce pt perhaps, the age that crucified CHRIST HIMSELF!!! If over 99% of those who di ed at the same time with Saint Bernard went to Hell, then what can be said about our time which is the era of the most successful diabolical disorientation yet? Let us also consider that Hell is the worst punishment that can be suffered by any creature be it man or spirit. Saint Teresa of Avila was made to be in Hell f or a moment and it took her ten years to recover!!! There is absolutely no need to be in ignorance about this issue because as Venerable Thomas á Kempis wrote u nder the inspiration of the HOLY GHOST, “It is no small matter to lose or gain t he Kingdom of GOD.”54 All in all, it is much better we risk being mocked on the failure of the Consecration (which is absolutely impossible) than to avoid press uring our bishops and the Pope to do it; and when they do it, there will be true peace: absolute tranquillity of order. In other words, there will be the total absence of war from the Middle East to Africa, to the Americas, to Chechnya, to Myanmar, to Afghanistan, to Colombia, to North Korea, to China, to Russia: there will be peace everywhere!!! That is why the devil will not allow the Consecrati on, because a peaceful world is a disaster for him. But it is in a peaceful worl d that there can be genuine development and progress unlike the sham we are pres ently experiencing at the cost of so many souls. So, are we going to allow the e rrors of Russia to fall on us or are we going to accept our GOD-given destiny? T he choice is for us to make too and not for Father Gruner and for the Internatio nal Fatima Rosary Crusade alone. Meanwhile time is running out. Once the weapons of mass destruction start flying about, there might be no turning back!!! Even though “it will never be too late to have recourse to JESUS and Mary”, how many will remember the Consecration in the event of the War when they cannot do that
when it has not started? Will it not be better to prevent the War entirely than to allow it to begin in the first place before getting the Consecration done to end it? When GOD first made the request for the Consecration of Russia in 1929, the preparation for the Second World War, which actually began in 1938 “during t he reign of Pius XI” as precisely predicted by Our Lady on Friday, July 13, 1917 in Fatima with Hitler’s invasion of Austria and not in 1939 as is usually mista kenly claimed, was in its eleventh year but it could have been brought to nought at any time between then and the “night illumined by an unknown light” on Janua ry 25, 1938 or even at anytime during the War itself. We cannot afford to repeat the same mistake. Who knows in what year of preparation that the Third World Wa r is? We do not know how much time we have before the outbreak of the War, but i t will not be advisable to wait to find out. Then just as we now read and analyz e the blunders of Adam and Eve, Sodom and Gomorrah, Ananias and Saphira, King Sa ul, Judas Iscariot, Louis XIV-XV of France, etc., future generations will also r ead and analyze the blunders of generations that suffered horrible misfortunes b ecause a simple consecration was not done. Interior Practices To live and die and to do all things forever: 1. BY MARY 2. WITH MARY 3. IN MARY 4. FOR MARY Mary has broken more records than any human that has ever lived, that is living, and that will ever live: the first and only Human to be conceived without origi nal sin, purest Soul of all time, first Disciple of JESUS CHRIST, first Nun, fir st and only Woman to conceive supernaturally without sex, first and only Woman t o give birth without the least labor pang, first and only Virgin to retain Her v irginity after giving birth, first Person on Earth to see JESUS CHRIST face to f ace, the only Saint to live without committing the least sin or imperfection eit her by thought, word, deed or omission, the most beautiful Woman of all time (Of course She did not walk around naked before the whole world to prove this unlik e the public nudity queens of our unfortunate times who are nothing but sputa on the face of womanhood and embodiments of shamelessness), the only Person in Hea ven with body and soul apart from JESUS CHRIST (Henoch and Elias did not enter H eaven with their bodies, see John III: 13 and John VI: 46), wisest Human ever ( King Solomon has absolutely nothing on Her!), first Person to see JESUS CHRIST a fter HIS Resurrection (Mary Magdalen? Please! You have got to be kidding me!), m ost intelligent Human ever, most humble Human ever, most decent Woman ever, most pious Woman ever, and so on and so forth. Another one of Her records (which She has kept creating and smashing even in eternity, for example Her October 13, 19 17 miracle of the sun is the greatest public miracle after the Resurrection and Ascension of CHRIST and the greatest miracle of the 20th century) is that no one who has ever had recourse to Her has been lost. You and I will not be the first . Let us then proceed to unlearn what we have learnt, re-orient our diabolically disorientated lives and let us do this in the most perfect way: by Mary, the me ans through which GOD came to us in the PERSON of JESUS CHRIST. Glory to Mary in JESUS! Glory to JESUS in Mary! Glory to GOD alone! Ave! Maria! Glory to JESUS! Honor to Mary! From the tribe of Levi and James Zebedee the Apostle in the Church Militant, Nig eria, DEOGratias Saeculorum firstname.lastname@example.org REFERENCES
1. Louise Martin, Immodest Dress: The Mind of the Church, www.catholictradi tion.org/Children/immodest-dress.htm. 2. Cardinal Pompili, Cardinal-Vicar of Pius XI, September 24, 1928. 3. Pius XII, Munificentissimus Deus, November 1, 1950. 4. Marcel Lefebvre, A Bishop speaks, p.131; See also Michael Davies, Pope J ohn’s Council, Chapter V. 5. Council of Constance, Session 43; 23, March 1418, On tithes and other du es. 6. Council of Trent, Session the Fourth, Decree Concerning the Edition, And the Use of Sacred Books. 7. Lib. de Dignitate Rosarii’, caput II. 8. Saint Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort, True Devotion to Mary, no. 63. 9. The Remnant, May 31, 2005. For more information and/or copies contact Th e Remnant, 21170 West Linwood Dr., N.E., Wyoming, MN 55092. 10. The Fatima Crusader, Issue 87, p. 10 (To read or order, visit www.fatima .org or contact Servants of Jesus and Mary, 4552 Kraft Road, Fort Erie. ON L2A 4 M7, Canada). 11. Pius IX, Esti Multa, November 21, 1873, par. 28. 12. Our Lady of the Roses, May 26, 1976; May 29, 1979; June 18, 1978; www.tl dm.org/directives/d180.htm. 13. Pope Paul VI, May 17, 1972. 14. Venerable Mary of Agreda, The Divine of the Most Holy Virgin, p. 41. 15. Ibid, p. 73. 16. Ibid, p. 71. 17. Ibid, p.126. 18. Saint Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort, True Devotion to Mary, no. 49. 19. Saint Gregory the Great, The Life of St. Benedict. 20. Pius XI, Mortalium Animos, January 6, 1928, pars. 8, 9, 10. 21. First Council of Nicaea (425 A.D.), Canon 18. 22. The Catechism of the Council of Trent, The Sacrament of the Eucharist, T he Laity Prohibited To Touch The Sacred Vessels. 23. Ann Ball, Modern Saints: Their Lives and Faces - Book One, p.370. 24. Agonizing Jesus Christ’s Message, November 12, 1999. 25. For a detailed analysis of the errors being propagated by this seemingly Catholic network, read EWTN A Network Gone Wrong by Christopher A. Ferrara. 26. Clement XII, Const. In Eminenti, April 24, 1738. 27. John Vennari, The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita: A Masonic B lueprint for the Subversion of The Catholic Church, p.5. 28. Ibid, p. 5. 29. Ibid, pp. 6-10. 30. Father Paul Kramer, The Devil’s Final Battle, pp. 47, 48. 31. http://www.fatima.org/thirdsecret/otherwitness.asp. 32. Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris, March 19, 1937, pars. 58, 77, 80. 33. http://www.tldm.org/news3/impostor.htm; See also http://www.tldm.org./Ne ws8/witnessToThe ImpostorPope.h tm, http://www.tldm.org/news8/mysteriesofpopepau lvi%27papacy.htm and http://www.smwa.org/Message/Text/1975/75_27_09.htm. Also, h ttp://www.tldm.org/directives/d50.htm and http://www.tldm.org/directives/d49.htm . 34. Michael Davies, Apologia Pro Marcel Lefebvre Volume 1, Chapter 14. 35. http://www.tldm.org/news3/johnpauli.htm and http://www.smwa.org/Message/ Test/1980_1989/83_21_05.htm. 36. www.tldm.org/News4/WarningsFromBeyond.2of3.htm, June 10, 19774. 37. Pius XI, Quas Primas, par. 28 December 11, 1925. 38. Council of Trent, Session the Twenty-fourth, Decree on the Reformation o f Marriage, Chapter X. 39. Barnabas Nwoye, Golden Peace of Silence, The way of Perfect Prayer, Less ons of Perfection (4), pp. 36, 37. 40. Pope St. Pius V, Apostolic Constitution QUO PRIMUM, July 14, 1570. 41. Council of Trent, Session the Seventh, On the Sacraments in General, Can on XIII.
42. Pope Pius X, Tra le Sollecitdini, pars. 15, 19, 20, November 22, 1903. 43. Ibid., par. 7. 44. Ibid., pars. 13, 14. 45. Council of Trent, Session the Twenty-Fourth, Decree on Reformation, Chap ter VII. 46. De Romano Pontifice, lib. II, chap. 29, in Opera omnia, Neapoli/Panormi/ Paris: Pedone Lauriel, 1871, vol. I, p. 418. 47. Council of Constance, Session 8; 4, May 1415. 48. www.catholicplanet.com/CMA/index.htm, Summary of “Correct” Doctrine.
49. Pius XI, Caritate Christi, May 3, 1932, (A.A.S., Vol. XX-IV, 1932, p. 19 0). 50. The Whole Truth About Fatima, Vol. 1, p. 182. 51. Father Louis Kondor, Editor, Fatima In Lucia’s Own Words, Lucy’s Fourth Memoir, p. 109; see also John de Marchi, I.M.C., The True Story of Fatima, p. 41 . 52. The Fatima Crusader, Issue 49 (http://www.fatimacrusader.com/cr49/toc49. asp; see also The Five First Saturdays at http://www.fatima.org/essentials/mess age/default.asp; to order, contact Servants of Jesus and Mary, 4552 Kraft Road, Fort Erie. ON L2A 4M7, Canada). 53. Kondor, op. cit., p. 109; see also Rev. J. Da Cruz, More About Fatima, p . 69 (Translated by Rev. Fr. V. Montes de Oca, C.S.Sp.). 54. The Imitation of Christ, Book III, Chapter 47, No.3.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.