Chemical , work

© All Rights Reserved

62 views

Chemical , work

© All Rights Reserved

- Tutorial
- High-Pressure Trickle-Bed Reactors A Review.pdf
- Costacurta Reactor Internals
- 2016 CHEMCAD Workshops Download
- Corrections 1stprinting (1)adsf
- 1. Introduction& Fundamentals.pdf
- TE Complete
- (Process Safety Guidelines and Concept Books) Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) - Bow Ties in Risk Management _ a Concept Book for Process Safety-John Wiley & Sons (2018) (1)
- 0 Unit 2018 Winter
- Agitator Power Requirement and Mixing Intensity Calculation.xls
- cstr-experiment 2
- CF Braun
- Reactor 2 Energy Requirement
- TA17.pdf
- che416 b
- Catalyst_TRK S1.ppt
- ma-c
- 471 HOMEWORK 1 2008
- Rene_High_Performance.pdf
- Article Tcetoday April 2007

You are on page 1of 8

Solutions:

a) Conversion and heat duty for an isothermal reactor operating at 298 K.

Calculation of conversion for an isothermal reactor operating at 298 K:

Mass balance for A over CSTR gives FA0 FAf V ( rA ) exit

Since ( rA ) exit kC Af , we get v0C A0 v f C Af VkC Af , where v0 is the volumetric flow rate at

the inlet and v f is the volumetric flow rate at the exit.

Conversion is defined as x Af

FAf FA0

FA0

v f C Af v0C A0

v0C A0

Thus, the mass balance for A over the reactor becomes v0 x Af Vk (1 x Af ) , which gives

1 x Af

x Af

v

1

0

where V / v0 is the space time.

Vk k

k

1

1 k 1 1

k

-4 -1

Therefore, we get

x Af

(1.1)

We get k = 0.0988

Thus,

x Af

For the data given, we could start with equation (8.18) from the Lecture Note Set 8, which is

T 0C p (T f T0 ) FA0 x Af H R (@ T f )

Q in W shaft

m

in

Neglecting shaft work and using m T 0 v0 , the above equation can be reduced to

Q in v0 C p (T f T0 ) v0C A0 x Af H R (@ T f )

(1.2)

v C x H (@ 298)

Q

in

0 A0 Af

R

( 0.86 x 10 - 3 m 3 /s) ( 2.0 kmol/m3 ) (0.09) ( 167,500 kJ/kmol of A reacted )

25.9 kJ/s 26 kW

b) Conversion and reactor temperature for an adiabatic reactor with inlet temperature of 298

K.

(1.1) gives the mass balance where k is a function of temperature described by the Arrhenius Law as

E

k (T ) k 0 exp

.

RT

k ( 298)

1.7 10 4

E

k0

s -1

k ( 298) k 0 exp

which gives

E

41,870

exp

exp

298 R

298 R

298 8.314

Therefore,

1

1

E 1

41,870 1

4

k (T ) k (298) exp

1.7 10 exp

R T 298

8.314 T 298

-1

s

(1.3)

Heat balance given by (1.2) for an adiabatic case which negligible shaft work reduces to

v0 C p (T f T0 ) v0C A0 x Af H R (@ T f ) 0 .

Since an average specific heat capacity is assumed, from Lecture Note Set 8, we could see that the

heat of reaction can be taken to remain a constant. Therefore, we get

x Af

C p (T f T0 )

C A0 H R (@ T f )

(1050 kg/m3 ) (4.19 kJ/kg.K)(T f T0 ) K

( 2.0 kmol/m3 ) ( 167,500 kJ/kmol of A reacted )

(1050) (4.19)(T f T0 )

( 2.0) ( 167,500)

x Af 0.0131(T f T0 )

(1.4)

Plotting (1.1) [with k given by (1.3)] and (1.4) [with T0 = 298 K] in the same graph we get

T

298

300

302

k

0.00017

0.00019

0.000213

(x_Af)_mass balance

0.08994709

0.09960537

0.110028968

(x_Af)_heat balance

0

0.0262

0.0524

304

306

308

310

310.5

311

311.5

312

0.000237

0.000264

0.000294

0.000327

0.000336

0.000345

0.000354

0.000363

0.12124038

0.13325719

0.146091301

0.159748213

0.163290984

0.166885022

0.170530201

0.174226361

0.0786

0.1048

0.131

0.1572

0.16375

0.1703

0.17685

0.1834

The temperature is 310.5 K and the conversion is 0.163 for the adiabatic case.

c) Conversion and preheating temperature for an adiabatic reactor with a reactor

temperature of 363 K.

Mass balance would remain the same as (1.1), in which k must be calculated at the reactor

temperature of 363 K as

1 -1

41,870 1

-1

k (363) 1.7 10 4 exp

s 0.003505 s

8.314 363 298

k

1

x Af

1

1 k 1

(1.1) therefore gives

0.67

3

-1

0.581 x 10 s 0.003505 s

The inlet temperature can be calculated using the heat balance given by (1.4) as follows:

T0 T f

x Af

0.0131

363

0.67

311 .86 312 K

0.0131

Conversion is 0.67 and preheating temperature is 312 K for an adiabatic reactor with a

reactor temperature of 363 K.

d) Conversion and heat duty if the reactor is operated non-adiabatically without preheating

and at a temperature of 363 K.

Conversion is as the same as in case (c) since it is influenced by the reactor temperature which is the

same as in (c). Heat duty shall be calculated using (1.2) as follows:

1050 kg/m3 4.19 kJ/kg.K (363 298)K

3

Conversion is 0.67 and heat duty is 53 kW if the reactor is operated non-adiabatically without

preheating and at a temperature of 363 K.

Tabulating the results:

Part

Feed

Temperature,

T0 K

Reactor

Temperature,

Tf K

Conversion

of A attained,

x Af

Heat duty of

the reactor,

Q

in kW

a)

298

298

0.09

26

b)

298

310.5

0.163

c)

312

363

0.67

d)

298

363

0.67

53

Observations

For isothermal operation of CSTR

at 298 K, we reach only 9%

conversion of A, which is very low.

For adiabatic operation with feed

stream at 298 K, the reactor

temperature stabilizes at 310.5 and

conversion of A stabilizes at

16.3%, which is still low.

For adiabatic operation with

preheating feed stream to 312 K so

as to maintain the reactor

temperature at 363, conversion of

A stabilizes at 67%.

Heat required to heat the feed

stream from 298 K to 312 K is

given below.*

Without preheating the feed

stream, we could heat the reacting

mixture to 363K in a non-adiabatic

operation of the CSTR.

Conversion of A stabilizes at 67%

as in part (c).

Heat required to heat the reacting

mixture is the same as the heat

required to heat the feed stream

from 298 K to 312 K.

= v0 C p (312 298)

( 0.86 x 10-3 m 3 /s) (1050 kg/m3 ) (4.19 kJ/kg.K)(312 298) K

= 53 kW

2) This problem will be worked out using the notation used in Lecture Note Set 10.

Adsorption reaction can be written as

A( g ) S A S

k

Therefore, forward reaction rate equals the backward reaction rate. Hence we write the following:

kp ACv k C A S

(2.1)

k

S

Surface reaction A S A( g )

A2 ( g ) S is rate limiting, and therefore rate of production of A2 is

given as

rA2 rA S rA k S C A S p A

(2.2)

Since C AS in (2.2) is a variable, it must be converted to a constant. To do that, first we write the

site balance as

C t Cv C A S

(2.3)

k

k C

1

C t A S C A S 1 C A S

1 C A S

kp A

kp A

K A pA

where K A k / k is the adsorption equilibrium constant.

Eliminating C A S from (2.2) and (2.4), we get

k K C p2

pA S A t A

1 K A pA

1

1

K A pA

Ct

rA2 k S

Therefore the rate expression becomes,

2

k K C ( RT ) 2 C A

rA2 S A t

1 K A RTC A

(2.4)

X-OH + Y-H X-Y + H2O

An equimolar feed of liquid X-OH and Y-H at 25oC are fed to a CSTR.

At 25oC, where all four material species are liquids.

At 25oC, the heat of reaction Hrxn = -200 kJ/mole.

At 25oC, the heat capacity of each liquid-phase species is 4 kJ/(kg oC).

The molecular weight of X-OH is 150 g/mole, and the molecular weight of Y-H is 100 g/mole.

The temperature inside the reactor (T) is controlled by putting the reactor in thermal contact with a

fluid flowing over the outside of the reactor at temperature Ta.

To a good approximation, the heat transfer rate (Q, in watts) from the fluid flowing over the outside

the reactor to the contents of the reactor is given by the linear expression: Q = UA(Ta-T)

a) If the reaction is carried out with the reactor at steady-state at the inlet temperature of

25oC, is T greater than, less than, or equal to Ta?

For an exothermic reaction, to maintain the products at the same temperature as the reactants one

must remove heat. So T must be greater than Ta, i.e. Ta must be below room temperature (25oC).

b) When running the reactor at T = 25oC to 50% conversion, the productivity is unacceptably

low. To try to accelerate the reaction, it is decided to increase the steady-state reactor

temperature to T = 105oC. At this temperature, all of the H 2O formed evaporates, but the

other species are still liquids. The heat of vaporization of H 2O at 105oC is +40 kJ/mole.

When T = 105oC, the reaction runs to 50% conversion 10x faster than it did at 25 oC, so we

increase the flow rates until the reactor is making 10x as much product as it did at 25 oC

(still at 50% conversion). When we achieve the new steady-state high-productivity

operation at 105oC, will the magnitude of Q (i.e. |Q|) be larger, smaller, or the same as it

was when we were operating at 25oC? At this steady-state condition, is T greater than, less

than, or equal to Ta?

When running the reactor at T = 25 oC (i.e., isothermal conditions) to 50% conversion, the heat

requirment can be calculated as follows:

FA0 x Af H R (@ 298) ( FA0 mole/s) (0.5) ( 200 kJ/mole) -100 FA0 kW

When running the reactor at T = 105oC (i.e., non-isothermal conditions) to 50% conversion, the heat

required can be calculated as follows:

Q in non isothermal

Heat required to heat up X - OH stream from 25o C to 105o C

Heat required to heat up Y - H stream from 25o C to 105o C

Heat released by the reaction Heat required to vapourise the water produced in the reaction

Data provided states that the feed flow rate is 10 times more than the isothermal case and the

conversion remains 50%.

Q in non isothermal

(10 FA0 mole/s) ( 4 kJ/kg o C) (105 25) o C (10 FB 0 mole/s) ( 4 kJ/kg o C) (105 25) o C

(10 FA0 mole/s) ( x Af ) H R (@ 298) (10 FA0 mole/s) x Af ( heat of vapourization of water)

Q in non isothermal

(10 FA0 0.25 kg/s) ( 4 kJ/kg) (80) (10 FA0 0.10 kg/s) ( 4 kJ/kg) (80)

(10 FA0 mole/s) (0.5) ( 200 kJ/mole) (10 FA0 mole/s) (0.5) ( 40 kJ/mole)

10 ( 0.15 0.1) 4 80 1000 200 FA0 kW

800 1000 200 FA0 kW

0

Note that the heat released by the reaction balances the heat required to warm up the mixture and

evaporate the water. Therefore, T should approximately equal Ta.

In contrast, when we ran the reactor at 298 K, we had to remove heat at a rate of 200 kJ/kg.

c) Since operating hot improved our productivity, but conversion is still pretty low, the

operator tries to improve things by cranking up the temperature, preheating the inlet

streams to 185oC and increasing Ta. For good measure the operator simultaneously cranks

up the reactor pressure from 1 bar to 100 bar; at this high pressure all the species remain

as liquids. (The reactor is safe at this condition, and even up T = 300 oC.) Curiously, the

conversion and productivity of the reactor do not increase under these severe conditions,

instead they decrease. Propose an explanation for this experimental observation.

It is possible that we are running into equilibrium limitations on the reaction. For exothermic

reactions, Keq decreases with increasing temperature. So if we are equilibrium limited at high T, we

would expect the conversion to decrease as T increases. (Note that by increasing the pressure so

dramatically, the operator prevented most of the H2O from evaporating, hence the concentration of

H2O in the liquid phase is probably much higher now than it was in the 105 oC case where the water

evaporated; this contributes to the equilibrium limitation).

d) Your manager gives the operator who turned up the temperature (without doing any

calculations first) a formal reprimand, saying the operator is probably lucky that the

conversion went down instead of increasing. Why do you think the manager was happy

that conversion was low instead of increasing a lot?

Exothermic reactions can run away if T goes high enough, i.e. past a certain point, the steadystate conversion will suddenly jump from a low number to a very high conversion, releasing

essentially the whole exothermicity, and jumping the T to a temperature above the safety limits of

the reaction vessel. In the present case, if the reverse reaction were negligible the reaction would

release 800 kJ/kg, enough to increase the temperature inside the reactor by up to 200 degrees, so it

could have exceeded the T = 300oC safety limit. The results could have been fatal to the operators or

7

anyone else nearby. But fortunately in this case it was lucky that high conversion was not

achievable due to the small value of the equilibrium constant.

- TutorialUploaded byAdisti Rena Linardi
- High-Pressure Trickle-Bed Reactors A Review.pdfUploaded bysuprateem
- Costacurta Reactor InternalsUploaded byapitbhu
- 2016 CHEMCAD Workshops DownloadUploaded byRawlinson Tolentino
- Corrections 1stprinting (1)adsfUploaded byDuc Hoang
- TE CompleteUploaded byblue_sky65
- (Process Safety Guidelines and Concept Books) Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) - Bow Ties in Risk Management _ a Concept Book for Process Safety-John Wiley & Sons (2018) (1)Uploaded byJulian Merida Gaitan
- Agitator Power Requirement and Mixing Intensity Calculation.xlsUploaded byWael Abdel-Mageed
- 1. Introduction& Fundamentals.pdfUploaded byFaisal Mumtaz
- 0 Unit 2018 WinterUploaded byHenry Lambis Miranda
- cstr-experiment 2Uploaded byDhiyyah Mardhiyyah
- CF BraunUploaded byTito Echeverria
- Reactor 2 Energy RequirementUploaded byLouie G Navalta
- TA17.pdfUploaded byamerico007
- che416 bUploaded byAdeniji Adetayo
- Catalyst_TRK S1.pptUploaded byAdrianus A. Adiwijaya
- ma-cUploaded byasharab70
- 471 HOMEWORK 1 2008Uploaded byHungDo
- Rene_High_Performance.pdfUploaded byzack
- Article Tcetoday April 2007Uploaded bykseshu
- 146743Uploaded bypolytechnic5scce
- Bkf3472 - Chem. Reaction Engineering II 21616-2Uploaded bySiti Hajar
- L6 WW Treatment 2Uploaded byMarzook Meerashahib
- 106694019 Acetone Reactor Design Complete ProjectUploaded byOlibear Arellano
- MOF Paper in Chemcomm-3 CopyUploaded byFalak Sher Hussain
- CHE 126Uploaded byopabaleke
- 2011 Chemistry - Caringbah Without SolutionsUploaded byWilliam Hou
- Acetone Peroxide IUploaded byreupload
- 2013 Ch 5-1 ReactorsUploaded byronald
- Catalysis Today Volume 66 Issue 2-4 2001 [Doi 10.1016%2Fs0920-5861%2800%2900626-x] C Maretto_ R Krishna -- Design and Optimisation of a Multi-stage Bubble Column Slurry Reactor for Fischer–Tropsch SynthesisUploaded byIka Sulistyaningtiyas

- Apping GuideUploaded byAnirudh Subramanyam
- Vistage.com-New Product Development Process the Role of Design RampD and MoreUploaded bySumit Verma
- Healthy Living, WHOUploaded byErick GN
- Chemistry Salt Analysis CheatsheetUploaded bySumit Dhall
- EndSemesterExaUploaded bySumit Verma
- Magoosh GRE sdfUploaded bySumit Verma
- acs non exclusive form.pdfUploaded bySumit Verma
- Acs Non Exclusive FormUploaded bySumit Verma
- Lp NotesUploaded bySumit Verma
- Fever Tips Home RemediesUploaded bySumit Verma
- Chap04_Imperfection in Solids (3)Uploaded bysandarulewis
- Assignment for Selfstudyay 2012 SolutionUploaded bySumit Verma
- bio materialsUploaded bySumit Verma
- Reference Texts for CL 444Uploaded bySumit Verma
- Printed BatteryUploaded bySumit Verma
- GRE General Vocabulary Word ListUploaded byjeetugeobhu
- Test 5 9 SolutionsUploaded bySumit Verma
- PolymerUploaded bySumit Verma
- AtpUploaded bySumit Verma
- bio materials course study for medicineUploaded bySumit Verma
- internship certificate format.docxUploaded bySumit Verma
- CoursesUploaded bySumit Verma
- SafetyUploaded bySumit Verma
- Horizontal Curve FormulaeUploaded byKevin Co Obligado
- Homework 2 and 3 GeneralUploaded bySumit Verma
- 27-TransportationUploaded bympe1
- Alignment Airport Site Design ProcessUploaded byDeepshikha Alha
- IRC - 37Uploaded byAsit Das
- Omcev Geometric Design Civil Engineering Transportation Aarsh MahavidylayaUploaded byARYA

- Reactor Sizing[1]Uploaded byJobb Six-steps Matheus
- Acidic Environment- Uploaded by Kenny LiuUploaded byMichael
- Effect of Temperature on Invertase ActivityUploaded byElizar Nepomuceno Gonzales
- BPG Polysulphide UseUploaded byapminshull
- Periodic Table Chemical Bonding Atomic Structure Plastics (Q&A)Uploaded bywakakka
- Carboxylic acid-2010.docUploaded byAhadh12345
- Petrochemical IndustryUploaded byS S S REDDY
- CM2200 Primary MetalsUploaded bybenrontol_20051786
- 1984Uploaded bybobothebioguy
- ME301-Lec-6.pdfUploaded byAdarsh Barnwal
- Stress Corrosion Studies of Titanium Dioxide Particulate Reinforced ZA-27 Metal Matrix CompositesUploaded byEditor IJTSRD
- igcse chemistry paper 1Uploaded byMostafa Barakat
- BeckmannUploaded byumesh pratap
- 11 Chemistry Impq Ch07 Equilibrium KvsUploaded byDevarajan Veeraraghavan
- Specific heat.docxUploaded byTerence Rivera
- CHE275 Chapter8 SlidesUploaded byAnastasia Budinskaya
- Chapter 2Uploaded byHaiqal Aziz
- chapter 9 review questions-keyUploaded byapi-269764684
- Consider Bottom Venting for Reactive LiquidUploaded byAndri Saputra
- Historical Perspective of Catalyst IndustriesUploaded byNikhil Vasudev
- IJC H2 Paper 1 and 2 Answers (for Sharing)Uploaded bySharon How
- Rancangan Pengajaran Kimia Tingkatan 5Uploaded byNurulkamilah Khairir
- 07 Organic Mechanisms EDEXCELUploaded byRach3ch
- Chem 14 Laboratory Class Guide - 2nd Sem Ay 2014-2015Uploaded byRomi Necq S. Abuel
- Chapter 16 - Oxidation and ReductionUploaded byGeorge
- A Feasible Process for Simultaneous Removal of CO2, SO2 and NOx in the Cement Industry by NH3 ScrubbingUploaded bymsm_sardar
- Aquatic ChemistryUploaded byCuc le Thi
- Us 3929416 Gip SumUploaded byAlan Pradana
- N-Demethylation of N-Me Alkaloids_Synthesis2012Uploaded bynagarajharish
- Methane Steam ReformingUploaded byrezaroohollahi