Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Division of Rheumatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Mail Slot - 509, 4301 West Markham, Little Rock,
AR 72205, United States
b Special Infectious Agent Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, P.O. Box 80216, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
c Department of Infection Control, Al Noor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
d Jeddah Regional Laboratory, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
e Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Hera General Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
f General Directorate of Health Affairs, Makkah Region, Hera General Hospital, P.O. Box 10513, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
Received 22 March 2007; received in revised form 16 July 2007; accepted 26 September 2007
Available online 29 September 2007
Abstract
Objective: To describe clinical profile of patients with dengue virus infection hospitalized at a single center during the first outbreak of dengue in
Makkah, Saudi Arabia from April to July 2004.
Methods: Clinical information and laboratory abnormalities of patients with suspected dengue infection were collected by a standardized data
collection sheet and review of medical records. Dengue virus infection was confirmed by a positive IgM capture ELISA or RT-PCR.
Results: Of the 160 clinically suspected patients, 91 were confirmed (64 by IgM ELISA, 14 by RT-PCR and 13 by both) to have dengue virus
infection. Dengue serotypes 2 and 3 were identified in 19 and 4 patients respectively. Most patients were young adults with median age of 26
(range = 694) years and male:female ratio of 1.5:1. The common symptoms were fever (100%), malaise (83%), musculoskeletal pain (81%),
headache (75%), nausea (69%), vomiting (65%) and abdominal pain (48%). According to World Health Organization (WHO) classification (10
patients were excluded due to lack of serial hematocrits), 75 (93%) had dengue fever (DF) and 6 (7%) had dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF). Only
one patient with DHF was in pediatric age group. Twenty-one patients (5 with DHF and 16 with DF) developed one or more clinical complications
that included bleeding (14), shock (4), seizures (3), acute renal failure (2), meningo-encephalitis (1), and secondary bacterial infection (1). Only one
patient with shock had dengue shock syndrome (DSS) by WHO classification. Development of clinical complications was significantly associated
with absence of musculoskeletal pain (p-value = 0.03), lower platelet counts (p-value = 0.03) and higher serum aspartate aminotransferase levels
(p-value = 0.04). The median duration of symptoms and hospitalization was 8 days (range = 318) and 4 days (range = 110) respectively. No
mortality was noted.
Conclusion: Occurrence of dengue virus infection in Makkah, Saudi Arabia is documented. Continued surveillance and effective vector control
programs are warranted due to unique population dynamics of Makkah that receives millions of pilgrims annually from all over the world.
2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Dengue virus; Dengue hemorrhagic fever; Saudi Arabia; Clinical symptoms; Complications; Epidemiology
1
2
3
4
5
6
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 501 686 6700; fax: +1 501 603 1380.
E-mail address: nakhan99@yahoo.com (N.A. Khan).
Formerly at Department of Internal Medicine, Al Noor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Tel.: +966 26400000x25049; fax: +966 26952076.
Tel.: +966 2566500x1105.
Tel.: +966 26375233.
Tel.: +966 25201604.
Tel.: +966 25203535; fax: +966 25201554.
0001-706X/$ see front matter 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.09.005
40
1. Introduction
Dengue virus is the most important arbovirus that causes
human disease. It belongs to Flaviridiae family, and is transmitted by mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. There
are four related but antigenically distinct serotypes of dengue
virus designated as DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3, and DEN-4. Most
individuals with dengue virus infection are asymptomatic, or
develop dengue fever (DF) characterized by fever and nonspecific constitutional symptoms. A minority of patients develop
severe disease in the form of dengue hemorrhagic fever and
dengue shock syndrome (DHF/DSS) that begins like DF but is
characterized by abrupt development of severe vascular leakage
which may rapidly lead to shock or death (Gibbons and Vaughn,
2002). Dengue has become a global disease being reported from
more than 100 countries, with 2.53 billion people living in
areas at potential risk of dengue transmission. It is estimated
that 50100 million patients of dengue infection occur annually of which 250,000 progress to DHF/DSS resulting in 24,000
deaths (WHO, 1997).
Dengue like disease was observed in the Arabian Peninsula
in the late 19th century (18701873). The disease appeared in
Zanzibar, in Dar el Salam, on the East African coast, in Arabia
(Aden, Mecca, Madina and Jeddah) (Gubler, 1997). In Saudi
Arabia, dengue virus (DEN-2 serotype) was first isolated from a
fatal case of DHF in Jeddah, a port city on the Red Sea, in 1994
(Fakeeh and Zaki, 2001). Surveillance from 1994 to 2002 at a
referral laboratory in Jeddah reported 319 confirmed patients
of dengue viral infection, most of whom (91%) were detected
during 1994 epidemic. DEN-2, DEN-1 and DEN-3 serotypes
were identified in that order of frequency (Fakeeh and Zaki,
2003).
Makkah is a city in Western Saudi Arabia located 75 km
inland from Jeddah. It is considered the holiest city in Islam
visited by more than four million pilgrims from all parts of
the world to perform Hajj and Umrah (minor pilgrimage). It
has a resident population of 650,000. The city is served by six
major hospitals. In this paper, we describe clinical features and
outcome of patients with dengue infection that were hospitalized at Al Noor Specialist Hospital, a 550-bed teaching hospital
managed by the Ministry of Health, during 2004 epidemic in
Makkah.
2. Patients and methods
Suspected dengue virus infection was defined as the presence of fever and any two of the following: myalgia, headache,
arthralgia, skin rash, retro-orbital pain, hemorrhagic manifestation(s), or leucopenia (white blood cell [WBC] count of
<4 109 L1 ). Confirmation of dengue virus infection was
based on either positive IgM antibody detection by enzyme
linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for dengue virus.
A standardized form was used, on the day of admission, to
collect information from suspected patients with dengue fever
about demographic details and following symptoms: fever,
chills, malaise, myalgia, arthralgia, retro-orbital pain, headache,
3. Results
Of the 160 clinically suspected patients, confirmatory studies
for dengue viral infection were performed on sera of 136 (84%)
patients (all had serological studies; 96 patients had RT-PCR).
Dengue infection was confirmed in 91 (66.9%) of the tested
patients (64 by IgM ELISA alone; 14 by RT-PCR alone; and 13
by both). Serological studies showed presence of IgM antibodies in 77 (58.8%) and IgG antibodies in 44 (32.4%) clinically
suspected patients. Thirty five patients had both IgM and IgG
antibodies present. IgM antibodies were detectable after median
of 5 days (range 311 days) after the onset of symptoms. RTPCR was done in 96 patients of which 27 (28.1%) were positive.
Specific dengue serotype identification was performed on sera
of 23 patients by RT-PCR. DEN-2 and DEN-3 were identified
from 19 and 4 patients respectively. Twelve (13.1%) patients
were admitted in April, 52 (57.1%) in May, 21 (23.1%) in June
and 6 (6.6%) in July of 2004.
Most patients were young adults with median age of 26
(range = 694) years. Seventeen (18.7%) patients were in pediatrics age group (age 18 years). Fifty-seven (62.6%) patients
were males. Patients had symptoms for median of 5 (range:
214) days prior to hospitalization. Table 1 shows the common
clinical manifestations seen in the 91 patients with confirmed
dengue viral infection. Notably, a large proportion of patients
(79%) had one or more gastrointestinal symptoms. Less common
symptoms included cough in 10, dizziness in 5 and dysuria in 4
patients. The mean temperature at the time of hospitalization was
38.5 1 C. Tachycardia (pulse rate 100 min1 ) was present
in 66 (74.1%) patients. Skin rash was relatively uncommon.
Lymphadenopathy was present in nine patients. Hepatomegaly
was documented in only one patient and none had splenomegaly.
One patient had jaundice. None of the patients had clinical
evidence of pleural effusion or ascites. However, ascites was
detected in two patients on abdominal ultrasonogram done to
evaluate severe upper abdominal pain and vomiting. Both the
patients fulfilled all the criteria for DHF.
WHO classification could not be used for assessing severity
in 10 patients, as they did not have serial hematocrit evaluation done. Among remaining 81 patients, 75 (92.6%) had DF
Table 1
Clinical presentation of patients with confirmed dengue virus infection
Symptoms
Patientsa
Musculoskeletal pain
Malaise
Temperature 38 C
Headache
Anorexia
Nausea
Vomiting
Abdominal pain
Diarrhea
Sore throat
Skin rash
74 (81)
74/89 (83)
69 (76)
68 (75)
66 (72)
63 (69)
58 (64)
44 (48)
20/51 (39)
25/41 (61)
17 (19)
41
No. of patients
Epistaxis
Skin petechiae
Gum bleeding
Rectal bleeding
Melena
Hematuria
Hemoptysis
5a
2
2a
2
1
1
1
42
Table 3
Comparison of clinical chemistry and coagulation abnormalities between
dengue fever (DF) and dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) patients
Variable
DF (n)
ALTa
ASTa
ALPa
Bilirubin, totalb
Albuminc
LDHa
CPKa
PTd
aPTTd
126
152
117
0.7
3.7
772
379
15.5
45.6
DHF (n)
121 (74)
118 (72)
77 (53)
0.6 (54)
0.4 (60)
343 (68)
421 (18)
1.5 (58)
10.8 (58)
199
268
323
0.8
3.3
1121
1330
16
52.2
99 (6)
133 (6)
243 (5)
0.1 (5)
0.3 (4)
697 (6)
1879 (3)
1.4 (6)
22.3 (6)
p-Value
0.19
0.14
0.05
0.06
0.02
0.37
0.36
0.13
0.76
43
References
Ahmed, Q.A., Arabi, Y.M., Memish, Z.A., 2006. Health risks at the Hajj. Lancet
367, 10081015.
Al-Buhairan, A.M., Khalil, S.H., Oluboyede, O.A., 1999. Reference range values of hematological parameters in Saudi healthy adults. Saudi Med. J. 20,
757762.
Ayyub, M., Khazindar, A.M., Lubbad, E.H., Barlas, S., Alfi, A.Y., Al-Ukayli,
S., 2006. Characteristics of dengue fever in a large public hospital, Jeddah,
Saudi Arabia. J. Ayub Med. Coll. Abbottabad 18, 913.
Deen, J.L., Harris, E., Wills, B., Balmaseda, A., Hammond, S.N., Rocha, C.,
Dung, N.M., Hung, N.T., Hien, T.T., Farrar, J.J., 2006. The WHO dengue
classification and case definitions: time for a reassessment. Lancet 368,
170173.
Fakeeh, M., Zaki, A.M., 2003. Dengue in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 19942002.
Dengue Bull. 27, 1318.
Fakeeh, M., Zaki, A.M., 2001. Virologic and serologic surveillance for dengue
fever in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 19941999. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 65,
764767.
Ghaznawi, H.I., Al-Khateeb, T.O., Akbar, N., Afifi, H., Nasser, A., 1997. Surveillance for dengue fever in Jeddah. East Mediterr. Health J. 3, 567570.
Gibbons, R.V., Vaughn, D.W., 2002. Dengue: an escalating problem. BMJ 324,
15631566.
Groen, J., Koraka, P., Velzing, J., Copra, C., Osterhaus, A.D., 2000. Evaluation
of six immunoassays for detection of dengue virus-specific immunoglobulin
M and G antibodies. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 7, 867871.
Gubler, D.J., 1997. In: Gubler, D.J., Kuno, G. (Eds.), Dengue and Dengue
Hemorrhagic Fever: Its History and Resurgence as a Global Public Health
Problem. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 122.
Guzman, M.G., Kouri, G., 2002. Dengue: an update. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2, 3342.
Harris, E., Videa, E., Perez, L., Sandoval, E., Tellez, Y., Perez, M.L., Cuadra,
R., Rocha, J., Idiaquez, W., Alonso, R.E., Delgado, M.A., Campo, L.A.,
Acevedo, F., Gonzalez, A., Amador, J.J., Balmaseda, A., 2000. Clinical,
epidemiologic, and virologic features of dengue in the 1998 epidemic in
Nicaragua. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 63, 511.
Kuo, C.H., Tai, D.I., Chang-Chien, C.S., Lan, C.K., Chiou, S.S., Liaw, Y.F.,
1992. Liver biochemical tests and dengue fever. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 47,
265270.
Lanciotti, R.S., Calisher, C.H., Gubler, D.J., Chang, G.J., Vorndam, A.V., 1992.
Rapid detection and typing of dengue viruses from clinical samples by
using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol.
30, 545551.
McBride, W.J., Bielefeldt-Ohmann, H., 2000. Dengue viral infections; pathogenesis and epidemiology. Microbes Infect. 2, 10411050.
44
Murgue, B., Deparis, X., Chungue, E., Cassar, O., Roche, C., 1999. Dengue: an
evaluation of dengue severity in French Polynesia based on an analysis of
403 laboratory-confirmed cases. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 4, 765773.
Phuong, C.X., et al., 2004. Clinical diagnosis and assessment of severity of
confirmed dengue infections in Vietnamese children: is the world health
organization classification system helpful? Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 70,
172179.
Scrimgeour, E.M., 2003. Epidemic infections and their relevance to the Gulf
and other Arabian peninsula countries. SQM J. Sci. Res.: Med. Sci. 5, 14.
Solomon, T., Dung, N.M., Vaughn, D.W., Kneen, R., Thao, L.T., Raengsakulrach, B., Loan, H.T., Day, N.P., Farrar, J., Myint, K.S., Warrell, M.J., James,
W.S., Nisalak, A., White, N.J., 2000. Neurological manifestations of dengue
infection. Lancet 355, 10531059.
Tai, D.Y., Chee, Y.C., Chan, K.W., 1999. The natural history of dengue illness
based on a study of hospitalised patients in Singapore. Singapore Med. J.
40, 238242.
WHO, 1997. Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention
and Control. World Health Organization, Geneva.