35 views

Uploaded by sujith reddy

save

- Inspire+Brochure
- 1 - manual GenOpt.pdf
- 08lpdstc En
- J3311-1-DSSP
- couplings-121226211146-phpapp02
- Ssi
- Fica
- Import Substitution in Leontief Models
- 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering Paper1
- Four-X Analyser Overview.pdf
- Statistical and Optimization Techniques for Laundry Portfolio Optimization at Procter Gamble
- Optimization Mesh Morphing Optimization 8
- 43399905 1 Optimizer Introduction Setup
- Thermal Modelling of Induction Machines
- 2017 - Anjos, Vieira - Mathematical Optimization Approaches for Facility Layout Problems_The State-Of-The-Art and Future Research Directions
- [2008 Ifac Conf] Intelligent Adaptive Dynamic Matrix Control
- MYr Power System Optimization
- 18003.pdf
- 47435
- Cooperative Distributed Energy Management for Smart Grid
- ICCGI09
- 35-FrameFabRoboticFabricationOfFrameShapes(1).pdf
- Crew Scheduling
- MCQ_m4_2.pdf
- 240906503-Mechanical-and-Spatial.pdf
- Redesigned Refrigeration2020 Year
- kupdf.com_william-t-thomson-marie-dillon-dahleh-theory-of-vibration-with-applications.pdf
- dmu_kinematics_simulator.pdf
- 16-PHYSICAL SCIENCES - Syllabus.pdf
- a newton raphson method for the solution of system of equations
- Theory of Mechanisms and Machines Ghosh and Mallik PDF
- Tips for Pat
- CBC Dubovskiy 2008
- Kinematic Analysis of Spatial Fixed-Axis Higher Pairs Using Confi
- dynamics systems in biomedical systems

You are on page 1of 9

**of a Double-Cardan-Joint Driveline
**

I. S. Fischer

Assistant Professor.

Mem.ASME

New Jersey Institute of Technology,

Newark, NJ 07102

R. N. Paul

Mem.ASME

W. R. Graces Co.,

Columbia, MD 21044

**The input-output displacement relations of two Cardan joints arranged in series on a
**

driveline has been investigated in detail, including the effects of unequal joint

angles, the phase angle between the two Cardan joints and also such manufacturing

tolerance errors as nonright angle moving link lengths and offset joint axes, A combined Newton-Raphson method and Davidon-Fletcher-Powell optimization

algorithm using dual-number coordinate-transformation matrices was employed to

perform the analysis. An experiment was conducted to validate the results of the

analysis. The apparatus consisted of a double-Cardan-joint driveline whose rotations were measured by optical shaft encoders that were sampled by a computer

data-acquisition system. The equipment was arranged so that the phase angle between the joints and the offset angles between the shafts at each of the two joints

could be readily varied. The "relative phase angle," the difference between the

phase angle of the two joints and the angle between the planes defined by the input

and intermediate and the intermediate and output shafts, was found to be the

significant factor. If the offset angles at both Cardan joints are equal, the doubleCardan-joint driveline functions as a constant-velocity coupling when the magnitude

of the relative phase angle is zero. If the offset angles at the two Cardan joints are

unequal, a condition prevailing in the important front-wheel-drive automobile

steering-column application, then fluctuation in output velocity for a constant input

velocity is minimized although not eliminated for zero relative phase angle.

Introduction

The double-Cardan-joint driveline has been extensively used

as a driveline in machinery, particularly the Hotchkiss

automotive drive. The geometry of an application is specified

by the offset angles (the angle between the input and intermediate shafts at the driving Cardan joint and the angle

between the intermediate and output shaft and the driven Cardan joint) and by the shaft offset (the minimum distance between the input and output shaft axes). In most applications

the mechanism is arranged so that the offset angles at the two

Cardan joints are equal and all the shafts are in the same

plane. Under those conditions the double-Cardan-joint

driveline will operate as a constant-velocity coupling. Analyses

of this arrangement are given in Doughtie and James (1954),

in Tyson (1954), and also by Austin, Denavit, and Hartenberg

(1965) who added consideration of manufacturing tolerance

effects. If the shafts are in different planes and the offset

angles are equal, then the Cardan joints can be phased relative

to one another to produce a constant velocity coupling. This

case was discussed by Mabie and Ocvirk (1975) and by Wagner

(1979).

Recently, the double-Cardan-joint driveline has been used

as a steering shaft in front-wheel-drive automobiles. As

reported in Cowles and Chiu (1984), this application does not

allow equal offset angles. The yokes of the two Cardan joints

on the intermediate shaft are located in different planes, a proContributed by the Mechanisms Committee for publication in the JOURNAL OF

MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received September 1989.

**cedure called joint phasing, in order to best approach
**

constant-velocity output. Saari (1954) approached this problem by combining the input-output displacements for two Cardan joints, Phillip (1960) used a spherical-trigonometry

analysis, Maziotti (1964) developed a vector procedure and

Cooney (1966) has given an expression but not its derivation.

This study has modeled the double-Cardan-joint driveline

with dual-number coordinate-transformation matrices and

has applied numerical techniques to create a procedure for

evaluating the effects of joint phasing and manufacturing

tolerance errors on the input-output displacement

relationship.

In addition, an experiment was conducted to validate the

results of the numerical analysis.

Analysis

The ideal double-Cardan-joint driveline is a six link spatial

mechanism with revolute joints. Although the Griibler equation predicts zero degrees of freedom, the mechanism operates

because of its special proportions. If those special proportions

are lost because of manufacturing tolerance errors such as

nonright angle moving link lengths and offset joint axes, then

it is necessary to consider one joint, in this study selected to be

the output joint, as cylindrical to accommodate the sliding

that occurs. This sliding motion is similar to that exhibited by

the single Cardan joint as described in Fischer and Freuden-

Journal of Mechanical Design

SEPTEMBER 1991, Vol. 113 / 263

**Copyright © 1991 by ASME
**

Downloaded From: http://mechanicaldesign.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 02/03/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms

this study will model the doubleCardan-joint driveline as an RRRRRC mechanism._. 1. 113.) (1) Equation (1) can be expanded into primary and dual components c{d.) -dis(al_l)s(6i) +ai_lc(oti_l)c(6i) -^.]- -3(6. . Duffy (1980) listed the solutions to various six-link mechanisms such as RCRRRR._i) sia^Jsid..) -.) 0 c(a / _.•_.c(et) 0 -djC^a^sidi) -a.y(a.-_ i )c (6.. and RRRCRP.cCa.) [A.Fig. Root.-_. The two methods of solution are available so that the most advantageous could be used depending upon the requirements at each position of the input variable.) 0 c(ai_l)s(di) c(a.) -d. The transformation between the coordinate frame on the link connecting joints i — 1 and /' and the coordinate frame on the link connecting joints /' and /+ 1 can be expressed as a dual-number matrix IA.org/terms . .) -5(0. This infers that the six transforms associated with the mechanism are related by the condition of loop closure: [A{\[A2] . )s (6.asmedigitalcollection. This equation governs the kinematics of the doubleCardan-joint driveline.) (2) The six links comprising the double-Cardan-joint driveline are connected serially to form a closed loop. and Hartenberg (1964). 2. RCRRRP. These procedures were developed for use with 4 x 4 homogeneous transformation matrices.)s(0 .) +e where the dual-number identity matrix [7| is defined as The numerical methods used to determine the displacements of the double-Cardan-joint driveline are based on the algorithm introduced by Hall. but the displacement analysis of the RRRRRC by Ju and Duffy (1985) had not yet been published when it was decided to model the double-Cardanjoint driveline as an RRRRRC and obtain the displacements by a numerical scheme.s(a!i_i)c(0i) -«._ +€ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (4) Equation (3) states that transforming from the frame fixed on one link in the mechanism through the frames fixed on each of the other links will result in a return to the original coordinate frame.-_i. and Sandgren (1977) that combines the Davidon-Fletcher-Powell (DFP) optimization routine with the Newton-Raphson (NR) method as applied to kinematics by Uicker. At joint i— 1 there is a coordinate frame fixed on the link connecting joints i — 1 and /. The solution to the general form of equation (3) will be found by numerical methods. Denavit._. )s (0.^(a.a. a condition that is troublesome for the NR method. 1 Double-cardan joint driveline stein (1984).) ._l) -diS(d._. It has six joints numbered 1 through 6.)c(0.) dfi (a.) d.-_. The DFP method is slower but will almost always find the displacements resulting in loop closure even if the initial guess of the displacements is poor. Dual-Number Formulation of Numerical Methods -s(a. but for this study were adapted to 3 x 3 dual-number matrices. Its position is specified by a z-axis aligned along the axis of joint /—1 and an x-axis aligned along the line of shortest distance between the axes of joints / — 1 and /.org/ on 02/03/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme. )c (6.. RRRCRR. the NR method is much faster. Therefore._.-. The algorithm for the numerical solution is shown in flowchart form in Fig.-_.) •s(a. c (a. Thus the DFP method is used for the initial position of the input-link rotation when it is difficult to guess the displacements at the output and particularly the inTransactions of the ASME Downloaded From: http://mechanicaldesign. [A6] = [f\ (3) 264 / Vol.) s(ai_l)s(ei) s(ai_l)c(Bi) c(a._. If the initial guess of the displacements has been made reasonably well.s (a.) + a.)c(0.-_! s(a. SEPTEMBER 1991 M= / 0 0~ 0 1 0 0 0 . A double-Cardan-joint driveline is illustrated in Fig.asme._i)c(0 / ) c(&.] = C(0. ) c(a.

U ld.2.2 B 4. H. (13) 3. however.2 1.Jr.1. HA (16) (7) (8) H.3 H.3 H 5d.l. does not include the constraint that the diagonal terms must each be equal to unity at closure. H.r.l.2 H-.l.-Mdual.l.2 B 3.3 J B 3. and Qr and Qp are the partial-derivative operators corresponding to equation (1) such that [Q.l.2 = R r termediate joints. d.3 = Breal 3.3d.'r. real 1. Denavit.1 B 1.2.2 Hn>d.2 HA4 rf.l H.3 H 6rf.1 1.2 H.1. (9) and Ax A2 A3 A4 A5 (10) A6=B Equation (10) can be written in a more compact form as P=BT~J (11) Writing out each term of equation (11) produces two 3 x 3 dual-number matrices: 1 1.2 H.3 The left-hand side of equations (14) and (15) contain the linear combination of the respective elements of the H matrices and the error terms as can be seen from the left-hand side of equation (8).\~I #2.l. 113 / 265 Downloaded From: http://mechanicaldesign. equation (13).2 Hi.asmedigitalcollection.] = -c(a)+eas(a) -s(a) c(a)-eas(a) 0 0 s(ot)+eac(ct) 0 0 F [Qph ec(a) es(a) 0 0 real'2. The resultant equation will have the form: (6) 0 "2. V. 'H.2.2.asme. H. real H< H.3 K 3. 2 Simplified flowchart of algorithm dual 1.l.2 'real-i ^real2.2. . resulting in a form which is computationally advantageous: H28d2 + H35d3+H45d4+H5885 =R " -Mreal " and •ec(a) 'dual3 j -°dual3 2 (15) 'real 3 ^real2.l.1 £ The real set.1 + Bn = B„ "3. V.2.3 H„ Hr d. Vol. rf. .org/terms . The NR method is used to determine the displacements associated with subsequent steps in the inputlink rotation because if those steps are small.org/ on 02/03/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.3 ' (12) This matrix equation comprises nine dual equations. H.3 ^r. Adopting the second method modifies equation (13) to reaij 3 [A4 + QrA456A][A5 + QrA5865][A6 + QrA6566 + 0 dualj 3 ^dual2 3 ^realj 2 Details of the Newton-Raphson Method A first-order expansion of equation (3) is {A(\[A2 + QrA28d2][A3 + QrA3863] = B. d.l.2 B2.A2 .1 + Br.3 3.l.l.2 B\.2 P QpA68D6] = I (5) where A„ are each evaluated at 0„ and D„ which are guesses of the displacement variables. -eac(a) . Using the three terms in the upper-right triangle of each matrix and separating them into a set of real equations and a set of dual equations produces: F = Ft -'reali T -°real-> .3 H. H. The displacements resulting in closure are usually found within a few iterations.2 H< HK 5 rf.'r. ddn and dD„ are the errors between the guesses and exact values of the displacements.= {A. Ai„l)Qx(AlA2 A. then the displacements determined for the previous input position are generally adequate as an initial guess.2 "d.1 / B 3. Equations (14) and (15) can be combined as partitions of a single matrix of real-number equations.3 H *d.3 H.^)7 .3 H 3d. ^dual .3 M= H.3 H. and Hartenberg (1964) or through modification of the current equations set as discussed in Sandor and Erdman (1984). This constraint can be included either as three additional equations as described by Uicker.2. H.5 d.3 H* Journal of Mechanical Design = where 0 + H6886 + H18D6=BT-I + BTi "2.3 (17) SEPTEMBER 1991.2 H ^'d.2 + B„ .l.where (START) H. — es(a) 0 (14) 'real A Equation (5) can be expanded and the higher-power terms neglected. only three of which are independent. . .1 V£5 W (STOP) = R •'realj 3 and Fig.2. Occasionally a solution cannot be found using the NR method and the algorithm will then use the DFP method to attempt to locate displacement values resulting in loop closure.

A. The DFP algorithm requires a set of gradients for each variable in addition to the objective function. proceeding in that direction by an amount determined by the closeness of the objective function to the target value (in this case. 3 Experimental apparatus 266 / Vol. The DFP algorithm is described in detail by Fox (16) and basically consists of selecting the direction of steepest descent of the objective function from the variable vector. Convergence is obtained when each of the error terms obtained from equation (20) is less than some specified resolution limit. After obtaining a solution for the given position of the independent variable Q{.3 + B„ + BreaU Equations for the Davidon-Fletcher-Powell Optimization Method.•Orpal real-)2 ji + ^ -"reaij ^reali ji °real31 "3.2 with its position. It is usually safe to use 20 degrees as a maximum step size. 113.2 + ^rea]^ + -^real 3. The solution set from the previous position is used as the starting values for the new iteration. zero) and then repeating three steps until the convergence criteria is satisfied.asmedigitalcollection. implying lack of closure. If perfect guesses of the displacement variables are substituted into equation (10). ' -"real 2.]^ 2 ) (21) /=i y=i which vanishes at closure but is greater than zero when closure does not occur. and this new set of joint variable positions is used in the next iteration to compute a new set of error terms. SEPTEMBER 1991 Downloaded From: http://mechanicaldesign. An experiment apparatus in- OUTPLH SHAFT H00ULE ANGLE BRACKET BASEPLATE PHASE COWLING 1HPW SHAFT MODULE DOlME-CAftOAN-JOJNT SHAFT Fig. The gradients provide the slope of the objective function with respect to each variable and are found by differentiation of equation (21) to be be2 504 865 866 5D6 (19) Rearrangement of equation (16) to solve for the error terms produces the required equation for the Newfon-Raphson iteration technique: A = M~> V j=l i 3 + (20) The guesses of the displacement variables d„ and Dn are revised by the error terms.org/terms Transactions of the ASME . For imperfect guesses. The difference between matrix B and the identity matrix can be embodied in an objective function such as BA (18) L^dual 3 2 ^ = E and E l t ^ e a ^ . Experimental Investigation A series of experiments were conducted to validate the results of the numerical analysis.M ^ ' + ^dua. a new position is selected and the entire process repeated. The step size between successive positions must be small enough to allow the Newton-Raphson technique to find closure. then matrix B will be the identity matrix as required by equation (3).org/ on 02/03/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme. matrix B will differ from the identity matrix. An optimization method can solve equation (3) by minimizing the objective function given by equation (21).asme. the condition of loop closure. This step size depends upon the specified mechanism and varies ax k= \ 3 d[Bd duaUjfc y'=l (22) dXi k=\ Equations (21) and (22) are used by the DFP method to find a solution.

input shaft. If tolerance errors result in offset joint axes..asme. 113 / 267 Downloaded From: http://mechanicaldesign.6 . 4.tion with respect to the input-shaft rotation. plot of the joint motions for a typical double-Cardan-joint the angle between the input and output shafts. The motion of the output shaft is displayed as angle 66 experiment apparatus did not permit variation of link angular and varies with two cycles per input-shaft revolution. offset 0. degrees Fig. 4 Computed joint motions offset angles both 35 deg. -9 -10 T 20 40 1 — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — r 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 THETA-1 POSITION. Motion of prismatic joint D6 is zero for this examlustrated in Fig. offset 0.867 in. 5 Computed I/O relationship offset angles both 35 deg. This dimensions and joint-axis offsets within the two Cardan nonuniform motion can best be visualized by the input-output joints. A modular basis so that the offset angle at each Cardan joint.org/terms . It is il.. These were inter.asmedigitalcollection. the ple. inches 350325 300 275 250 225 200-J 175 150 125 -j 100 75 50 H 25 OH -25 -50 H T — i — i — i — \ — i — i — i — i — i — i i i i i i i i r 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 2B0 300 320 340 360 THOA-I POSITION.867 in. phase angle 50 deg. Although provided for in the analysis. Figure 6 shows the sliding The numerical solution is capable of producing data on the which was computed by the numerical method for a doubleJournal of Mechanical Design SEPTEMBER 1991. degrees Fig. faced to a microcomputer for data acquisition. then sliding Results and Conclusions will occur at the prismatic joint. Vol.org/ on 02/03/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme. corporating a double-Cardan-joint driveline was designed on a motion of each joint in the double-Cardan-joint driveline. the offset driveline are shown in Fig.... 3. phase angle SO deg.lhelo-2 lhcto-3 thelo-4 lheto-5 lheto:6 d . Figure 5 illustrates the IO relationship for the joint motions in Fig. i?-type joints numbered 2 distance between the input and output shafts and the phase through 5 display single-cycle variation per revolution of the angle between the two Cardan joints could be varied. the lead and lag of the output-shaft rotaoptical shaft encoders to measure rotation. 3. Both the input and output shafts were equipped with (IO) relationship.

but with joint-axis offsets of 0. 1) is called the "phase angle.45 -5..1 inch errors in all links zero errors in all links -5." The "relative phase angle.55 -5. 6.asme. 113.25 -5. about the largest experienced in practical applications.867 in. degrees Fig.1 inches. Relative Phase Angle. For comparison. the fluctuation can range from zero degrees for RPA = 0 degrees to 20 degrees when RPA = 90 degrees.. If the input and output shafts do not intersect. 7 Effect of relative phase angle on I/O displacement relationship Cardan-joint driveline similar to that used to produce Fig. but are offset by a certain distance.4 i -5. offset 0.35 -5.65 0.2 H -5. SEPTEMBER 1991 RPA = (phase angle) . phase angle 50 i~~[ 7 9 i II i i i 13 15 17 i i i i i i 19 21 23 25 27 29 i i i r 31 33 35 37 JOINT ANCLE5.5 -5.75 1 0 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 20 40 60 80 100 120 HO 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 IHEIA-1 POSITION.15 -5. 7. Offset of Shaft Axes.-5. is defined as 268 / Vol.org/ on 02/03/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.3 -5. In the figure it is observed that for joint angles of 45 degrees.6 -5. the amplitude of fluctuation in output displacement increases significantly with relative phase angle to a maximum amplitude occurring at a relative phase angle of 90 degrees. As seen in Fig. degrees Fig. for a given RPA.org/terms . then the plane formed by the output and intermediate shafts and the plane formed by the input and intermediate shafts are displaced from one another by the "angle of twist.(angle of twist) (23) The importance of the relative phase angle is observed in Fig. 8. the motion of the same driveline but with zero joint-axis-offset tolerance errors is also shown in Fig.asmedigitalcollection. Transactions of the ASME Downloaded From: http://mechanicaldesign. For a driveline with equal joint angles.7 -5." RPA. 5." The relationship between the two planes each containing one of the Cardan-joint yokes which are mounted on the intermediate shaft (angle 4> in Fig. 6 Computed D6 motion for a mechanism with dimensional errors in the links offset angles both 35 deg.

8 10 9 A—A *—• #-•-£ 9-—9 Effect of offset on I/O relationship joint ongle = 5 degrees smaller smaller smaller smaller # joint angle = 15 degrees joint ongle = 25 degrees joint angle = 35 degrees / .alpha-6 alpha-6 alpha-6 1 I 1 1 1 1 I F 1 1 1 = 0.org/terms .867 in = 2.• 8 7 ' / .- . SEPTEMBER 1991. Unequal Joint Angles. These facts point to the conclusion that the need to minimize joint angle difference becomes ever more important with larger joint angles.asmedigitalcollection..• / . Vol. (2) Larger joint angles.. This is seen in Fig. Several characteristics can be observed in Fig.-•* ^ •••-•" ••-'*'"' ^ ^ " JS ^ ^ J f ^ ^ s* / ^ .asme. the double-Cardan-joint driveline will function as a constant-velocity coupling. This agrees with the results reported by Wagner (1979). with the difference between them held constant.169 in 1 1 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 1 1 1 I I RELATIVE PHASE ANGLE. Thus for RPA = 0. It is apparent that the amplitude of input-output fluctuation is minimized Journal of Mechanical Design for zero relative phase angle.-'*'' . when the phase angle equals the angle of twist.. 9 Effect of unequal joint angles on I/O relationship variation of the offset of the input and output shafts has negligible effect on the IO displacement relationship. 8: (1) Increasing the difference between the two joint angles results in larger amplitudes. When both joint angles in the driveline are equal. then arranging the mechanism so that the relative phase angle is zero will cause fluctuation in the inputoutput relationship to vanish. However.• 6 5- -t/ 4 - / s 21- y / 3" S / ' « . produce greater amplitudes.org/ on 02/03/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.-•- .y' / .000 in = 0. 9 which provides a measure of the input-output fluctuation amplitude for various combinations of joint angles at zero RPA. 0- ~ 1 8 6 1 I I 10 12 14 I I I 1 I I I I I I 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN JOINT ANGLES. degrees Fig. degrees Fig.'S' *' -••' . Larger amplitudes would be obtained for non-zero RPA's. it has been observed in this study that unequal joint angles results in a situation where the joints cannot be phased to arrange for constant-velocity motion. 113 / 269 Downloaded From: http://mechanicaldesign.

org/terms . then the amplitude of fluctuation will increase for larger joint angles.867 in. equal to the resolution of the encoders.. and Chiu.867 in.0323 degrees. 6 Conclusions. References 1 1 1 I I I i I I I I I 10 60 80 100 120 HO 160 180 200 220 240 260 200 300 320 340 360 Austin. The results for several phase angles in a typical arrangement of the input and output shafts are shown in Fig. offset 0.. 11 Comparison of experimental and computed data phase angles 30 and 60 deg. The designer should remember the importance of the relative phase angle and the joint angle difference on the input-output displacement relationship.. 10 Experimental measurement of I/O relationship offset angles both 30 deg. Denavit. To evaluate the error. An estimate of the magnitude of these effects is obtained by noting that a double-Cardan-Joint driveline with both joint angles equal to 45 degrees has an input-output fluctuation amplitude that grows from zero to about 20 degrees as the relative phase angle is varied from zero to 90 degrees. 113.36 degrees.1 deg -20. J. S. Jr. and that these quantities become increasingly more important with larger joint angles.. 10. Conditions where the two joint angles are unequal will always produce some fluctuation in the input-output displacement relationship no matter what the relative phase angle. Relative phase angle is defined as the difference between the measured phase angle and the angle of twist between the planes of each Cardan joint.asme. Offset angles both 30 deg.. C. 270 / Vol. the error had a magnitude of less than 1 percent of the peak signal." SAE Paper 660413. E. Dearborn. P. "Computer-Aided Analysis of a Steering Column Using Cardan Universal Joints. SEPTEMBER 1991 Transactions of the ASME Downloaded From: http://mechanicaldesign. J. offset 0. Fluctuation in the input-output displacement relationship vanishes when the joint angles at the two Cardan joints are equal and the relative phase angle is set to zero. The relative phase angle is the most important variable affecting the input-output displacement relationship of the double-Cardan-joint driveline. "Practical Procedures for Designing and Analyzing a Tandem Truck Driveline.Experimental Results.. Acknowledgments 1 S<S^*sJ ° • • • • ~l 0 20 phase phase phose phose ontjle angle angle ongle = = = - -20. 1966.1 deg ' = 0 deg 0 deg i i i i r i i—r—i—i i—r 100 120 HO 160 100 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 THETA-I POSIT ION. T. 1984. In that the measured amplitude of the fluctuation was about 4 degrees. Passenger Car Meeting. The small magnitudes of these errors indicated that the quality of the measurements was good. and Hartenberg. MSM-8602189. phase ongle computed. the experiment for which the joint angles were 10 and 30 degrees.867 in." SAE Technical Paper No.l POSITION. phase ongle computed. 251-257. MI. These planes are described geometrically by the center lines of the two shafts connected to either end of each Cardan joint.. R.org/ on 02/03/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme. the phase angle 60 degrees and the input-output shafts offset 0. The irregularities in the curves are observed to have a magnitude of 0. degrees Fig." ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY. 841204. phose angle = n 0 i i i i 20 40 60 80 i i = -20. A • / / " \ «7 ~vwr-\~r TAT \v A:__ experimentol. It is observed that there is close correlation between the experimental and analytical results. October 1-4. The amplitude of this fluctuation is minimized when the relative phase angle is zero. "Analysis of Errors in the Double Hooke Joint. degrees Fig. Experiments were conducted for a variety of arrangements. Y. May 1965.1 0 30 60 I I I The authors appreciate the support of this research by the National Science Foundation through Grant No. C . A comparison of experimental and computed results for a typical arrangement of input and output shafts with several phase angles is shown in Figs.asmedigitalcollection. H. I II1EI A . 11 and 12.-phose angle = experimental.. Cowles. Cooney. was repeated four times to arrive at a standard deviation in the measure output of 0. If the difference between the joint angles and the relative phase angle are held constant. pp.

. Mechanisms and Dynamics of Machinery. "Dynamic Characteristics of a Truck Driveline Systems.. A. N. NY. Vol. and Duffy.org/terms . September 1985. New York. I. AND AUTOMATION IN DESIGN. pp.asmedigitalcollection.1 POSITION. pp. V. 1975. Somerset. Maziotti. August 1977. 5R-C Mechanisms—A General Solution. 353-357.. H. L./ / -2 -4 -< -6 -10 N \ -o 2 • k ' - / / 1 0 / / -7 \\ '' i i \\ / V •''• // —•'"/ - \ \ \ \ ': \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \^ / •/ / \^/^ Vv experimental.." ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS. NY.. Offset angles both 30 deg. J.." Technical Report 60-WA-37. Prentice Hall Inc. R. Vol. Hall. S. H. Elements of Mechanism..10 . E. E. O. R. AND AUTOMATION IN DESIGN.. pp. J.. 1971. 1954. June 1964. d e g r e e s Fig. P. NY. New York. W.. and Hartenberg. ASME. X. 113 / 271 Downloaded From: http://mechanicaldesign.. H...asme. John Wiley & Sons. R. 175-178. Journal of Mechanical Design Mabie.." ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS. F. Analysis of Mechanisms and Robot Manipulators. J.. W. J..1 and 0 deg." Universal Joint and Driveshaft Manual. G. 621. Doughtie. F. Cooney. NJ. and Sandgren. C. = 30 deg 30 deg = 60 deg 60 deg 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 T HE T A . Advanced Mechanism Design: Analysis and Synthesis. TRANSMISSIONS. and Ocvirk... E. G." Machine Design. PA. 547-550. 411-415. Uicker. NJ.. Sandor. Wagner. H . SEPTEMBER 1991. 12 Comparison of experimental and computed data phase angles . "Kinematics of a General Arrangement of Two Hooke's Joints. and Freudenstein. Addison-Wesley Inc. 1964. Duffy. Society of Automotive Engineers." SAE SP#262. November 1960. Vol. Tyson. R. R. J. Warrendale. pp.. "How to Obtain Useful Speed Variations With Universal Joints. Fox.org/ on 02/03/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme. Kinematics. / ' ~v\ 4J *> ''. L. Inc. Ju. and James. I n c .20.. R. Reading. "Internal Force and Moment Transmission in a Cardan Joint with Manufacturing Tolerances. E. " A Dependable Method for Solving Matrix Loop Equations for the General Three-Dimensional Mechanism. Englewood Cliffs.. p. TRANSMISSIONS. Fischer. pp. J. phase angle = • \ ^ / i V-. Saari. Denavit. pp. Root. 391-311. "Displacement Analysis of Spatial Six-Link. WileyInterscience. 1979. MA. Optimization Methods for Engineering Design. 1984.. October 1954." ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons.. "Useful Design Aids.-v 6 /'" S 4 "NOI l— Ln O CL 0 LU i / / / e . L. Philipp. 1954.. and Erdman. September 1984. phose angle = experimental. phase angle computed. S. N. S. 106." ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry. Inc. John Wiley & Sons.. ed. 107. "An Iterative Method for the Displacement Analysis of Spatial Mechanisms. 309-314. New York...867 in. offset 0. 1980.. phase angle computed. A.

- Inspire+BrochureUploaded bycen1510353
- 1 - manual GenOpt.pdfUploaded byBazinga
- 08lpdstc EnUploaded bynirishkumar
- J3311-1-DSSPUploaded byRodrigo Garcia
- couplings-121226211146-phpapp02Uploaded byHarish Pothepalli
- SsiUploaded byAstri Rahmalia
- FicaUploaded byAnonymous RBdwUH9
- Import Substitution in Leontief ModelsUploaded byAdi Rahman
- 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering Paper1Uploaded bydr test
- Four-X Analyser Overview.pdfUploaded byBrandy Gonzalez
- Statistical and Optimization Techniques for Laundry Portfolio Optimization at Procter GambleUploaded bytyab
- Optimization Mesh Morphing Optimization 8Uploaded byVikram Mangalore
- 43399905 1 Optimizer Introduction SetupUploaded bynaved34
- Thermal Modelling of Induction MachinesUploaded byRohan Chandrashekar
- 2017 - Anjos, Vieira - Mathematical Optimization Approaches for Facility Layout Problems_The State-Of-The-Art and Future Research DirectionsUploaded byRamon Swell
- [2008 Ifac Conf] Intelligent Adaptive Dynamic Matrix ControlUploaded byyayarety
- MYr Power System OptimizationUploaded byTesfahun Girma
- 18003.pdfUploaded byAnonymous 7ZYHilD
- 47435Uploaded bySagarias Albus
- Cooperative Distributed Energy Management for Smart GridUploaded byDaniel Martac
- ICCGI09Uploaded byRômulo Santos
- 35-FrameFabRoboticFabricationOfFrameShapes(1).pdfUploaded byMaurizio Porcu
- Crew SchedulingUploaded bySantiago Cabrera

- MCQ_m4_2.pdfUploaded bysujith reddy
- 240906503-Mechanical-and-Spatial.pdfUploaded bysujith reddy
- Redesigned Refrigeration2020 YearUploaded bysujith reddy
- kupdf.com_william-t-thomson-marie-dillon-dahleh-theory-of-vibration-with-applications.pdfUploaded bysujith reddy
- dmu_kinematics_simulator.pdfUploaded bysujith reddy
- 16-PHYSICAL SCIENCES - Syllabus.pdfUploaded bysujith reddy
- a newton raphson method for the solution of system of equationsUploaded bysujith reddy
- Theory of Mechanisms and Machines Ghosh and Mallik PDFUploaded bysujith reddy
- Tips for PatUploaded bysujith reddy
- CBC Dubovskiy 2008Uploaded bysujith reddy
- Kinematic Analysis of Spatial Fixed-Axis Higher Pairs Using ConfiUploaded bysujith reddy
- dynamics systems in biomedical systemsUploaded bysujith reddy