You are on page 1of 28

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

MASTER TEACHERS I & II (Elementary)


NAME OF EMPLOYEE: ____________________________________
POSITION:
____________________________________
REVIEW PERIOD:
____________________________________
BUREAU/CENTER/SERVICE/DIVISION: _______________________

NAME OF RATEE:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW:

________________________
________________________
________________________

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING


MFO

KRA

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

WEIGHT
PER KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Professional

1.Participated in seminars,

100% of trainings and seminars were

Basic

Growth and

workshops, trainings or served

participated/facillitated and re-echoed within 2

Education

Development

as facilitator within the school

Sevices

20%

year (school, district, division,

June - March

5%

weeks which were rated excellently by the


participants.

regional & national)


5%

2.Prepared reports about the school


concerns/problems, awards and

Year-round

100% of school reports were prepared and


submitted on or before due dates.

promotions
3.Participated in the planning and
implementation of training
programs in school/district/

100% of planning and implementation


Year-round

5%

training programs of the school/district/division


were participated.

division level
4.Designed training matrices for
teachers (INSET, Professional

Designed 100% of training matrices for


Twice a year

5%

teachers

Meetings, etc)
Instructional

1. Carried regular teaching load

Competence

for the grade/subject areas.

50%

100% of regular teaching load were carried out


June- March

excellently during the rating period.


15%

ACTUAL
RESULTS

TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

15%

MFO

KRA's

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

WEIGHT
PER KRA

2. Assisted the School Head


in implementing school programs/

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
100% of daily lesson plans/ logs and visual

June- March

20%

aids related to the lesson were prepared

projects

excellently during the rating period.

3. Obtained 75% of the students

100% of the 75% of the students attained an

attained an average of 80%


proficiency in the required

June- March

15%

average of 80% proficiency in the required


competencies were obtained.

competencies
Instructional

1.Observed 100% of the teachers

100% of the teachers under supervision

Supervision

every quarter

were observed, conferred immediately and


June-March

30%

10%

suggestions/ recommendations were


excellently complied with by the teacher
every quarter within the year

2.Conducted 3 mentoring/ coaching


activities and prepared
instructional materials quarterly

100% of the teachers under supervision


10%

3.Guided co-teachers in the


performance of duties and
responsibilities based from the

received coaching/mentoring services, have


improved and submitted outputs immediately
100% of the teachers under supervision

5%

were guided in the performance of duties and


responsibilities in accordance with RPMS

RPMS
4.Checked regularlythe LP/DLL of
teachers under supervision

100% of the teachers' lesson plans under


5%

supervision were checked and reviewed


once a week

Plus

Received special awards/ recognition

Factor

for exemplary performance within

5%

the year

5%

Received Deped recognized special awards categorized


as National, Regional, Divisions, District and School level

ACTUAL
RESULTS

TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

TOTAL

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
RANGE
ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000
Outstanding
3.500-4.499
Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499
Satisfactory
1.500-2.499
Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499
Poor

Approving Authority:

PRINCIPAL

RATEE

ASSISTANT SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTEN


IN CHARGE OF DISTRICTS CONCERNED

_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________

AVERAGE

RATING

SCORE

AVERAGE

RATING

SCORE

CHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT


GE OF DISTRICTS CONCERNED

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM


RATING SCALE FOR MASTER TEACHERS I & II
ELEMENTARY
MAJOR FINAL
OUTCOMES
Basic Education
Services

KEY RESULT AREA


(KRA)

OBJECTIVES

RATING SCALE

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

1. Participated in seminar, workshops,


KRA Professional
trainings or served as facilitators within the
100% of trainings and seminars participated
Growth and
school year (school, district, division, regional
and re-echoed within 2 weeks
Development (20%)
& national)

E
Q
T
E

2. Prepared reports about the


schoolconcerns/ problems awards and
promotions.

3. Participated in the planning and


implementation of training programs in
school/district/division level

4. Designed training matrices for teachers


(INSET, Professional meetings, etc.)

100% of school reports were prepared and


submitted

100% of the planning and implementation of


training programs of the school/ district/
division were participated

100% of training matrices for teachers were


designed within the year

KRA Instructional
Competence (50%)

100% of regular teaching load were carried


out excellently during the rating period.

2. Prepared up-to-date, complete and


functional lesson plans/daily logs and
instructional materials

100% of daily lesson plans/logs and visual


aids related to the lesson were prepared
excellently during the rating period.

100%

90-99%

80-89%

Excellent evaluation were


obtained (4.00-5.00)
2 weeks after training
100%

Very Satisfactory (3.003.99)


3 weeks
90-99%

Satisfactory
2.99)

(2.00-

4 weeks
80-89%

Prepared school reports


with no error

3-5 days before due date

1-2 days before due date

On due date

100%

90-99%

80-99%

Acted as Over-allChairman

Acted as Co-Cahirman

Acted as Committee
Chairman

T
E

4 times
100%

3 times
90-99%

2 times
80-99%

Prepared school reports


with 1-2 errors

Prepared school reports


with minor errors

Prepared training matrices Prepared training matrices Prepared training matrices


with no error
with 1-2 errors
with minor errors
2 weeks before due date

6-8 days before due date

3-5 days before due date

E
Q
T
E
Q

100
Excellent
330 minutes
100
Excellent

90-99.99
Very Satisfactory
310-320
90-99.99
Very Satisfactory

80.89.99
Satisfactory
280-300
80-89.99
Satisfactory

180 days

140-179 days

120-139 days

T
1. Carried regular teaching load for the
grade/ subject areas.

MAJOR FINAL
OUTCOMES

KEY RESULT AREA


(KRA)

OBJECTIVES

3. 80% of the students attained an average


of 75% proficiency in the required
competencies

Delivery of Basic
Education Services

RATING SCALE

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

100% of the 80% of the students attained an


avrage of 75% proficiency in the required
competencies were obtained

100

90-99.99

80.89.99

80% of the students


attained an average of
75% proficiency in the
required competencies

75-79% of the students


attained an average of
75% proficiency in the
required competencies

70-74% of the students


attained an average of
75% proficiency in the
required competencies

Every Quarter

3 Quarters

2 Quarters

Observed 100% of the


teachers under your
supervision

Observed 90-99% of the


teachers under your
supervision

Observed 75-89% of the


teachers under your
supervision

100% suggestions/
recommendations given
have been excellently
demonstrated/ complied
with

90-99% suggestions/
recommendations given
have been excellently
demonstrated/ complied
with

75-89% suggestions/
recommendations given
have been excellently
demonstrated/ complied
with

KRA Instructional
Supervision 30%

1. Observed 100% of the teachers every


quarter

100% of the teachers under your supervision


were observed, conferred immediately and
suggestions/ recommendations were
excellently complied with by the teacher every
quarter within the year

Conferred with the teacher


Conferred with the teacher
Conferred with the teacher
immediately after the
2 days after the
a day after the observation
observation
observation

2. Conducted 3 mentoring /coaching


100% of the teachers under your supervision
activities and prepared instructional materials received coaching/ mentoring services, have
available quarterly
improved and submitted outputs immediately

MAJOR FINAL
OUTCOMES

KEY RESULT AREA


(KRA)

OBJECTIVES

100% of the teachers


under your supervision
received mentoring/
coaching services

90-99% of the teachers


under your supervision
received mentoring/
coaching services

75-89% of the teachers


under your supervision
received mentoring/
coaching services

100% of the teachers


under your supervision
have improved

90-99% of the teachers


under your supervision
have improved

75-89% of the teachers


under your supervision
have improved

RATING SCALE

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

3. Guided co-teachers in the performance of 100% of the teachers under your supervision
duties and responsibilities based from the
were guided and submitted the output with no
RPMS
error on time

Submitted the TQC outputs


Submitted the TQC
Submitted the TQC outputs
in 5 days after the conduct outputs in 10 days after
in 15 days after the
of the TQC
the conduct of the TQC
conduct of the TQC

90-99% of the number


100% of the number of
80-89% of the number
teachers under your
teachers under your
teachers under your
supervision were
supervision were evaluated
supervision were evaluated
evaluated based from the
based from the RPMS
based from the RPMS
RPMS

100% of the teachers


under your supervision
accomplished the IPCRF
with no error

Submitted the IPCRF


outputs on time

90-99% of the teachers


under your supervision
accomplished the IPCRF
with no error

75-89% of the teachers


under your supervision
accomplished the IPCRF
with no error

Submitted the IPCRF


Submitted the IPCRF
outputs a day after the due outputs two days after the
date
due date

All lesson plans were


checked and reviewed
once a week

Submitted the MTs


accomplishment log on
time

Submitted the MTs


accomplishment log

Submitted the MTs


accomplishment log once
every end of the month

INTERNATIONAL

NATIONAL

REGIONAL

100% of the teachers' lesson plan under your


4. Checked regularly lesson plans of
supervision were checked and reviewed once
teachers in the assigned grade/subject area
a week

Plus
Factor
5%

Received Deped recognized special


Received special awards/ recognition for awards categorized as National,
exemplary performance within the year Regional, Divisions, District and School
level

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
RANGE
ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000
Outstanding

3.500-4.499
2.500-3.499
1.500-2.499
Below 1.499

90-99% of the lesson 75-89% of the lesson plans


plans were checked and
were checked and
reviewed once a week
reviewed once a week

Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Poor

G SCALE
2

70-79.99%

Below 70

Unsatisfactory
1.99)

(1.00-

Poor (0-0.99)

5 weeks
70-79.99%

6 weeks or more
Below 70%

Prepared school reports


with major revision

Needs total revision

1-5 days after due date

2 weeks or more after due


date

70-79.99

Below 70

Acted as Co- Committee


Chairman

Acted as Committee
Member

Once
70-79.99%

Never
Below 70

Prepared training matrices


with major revision

Needs total revision

On due date

Late submission

70.79.99
Unsatisfactory
240-260
70-79.99
Unsatisfactory

below 70
Poor
below 240
below 70
Poor

100-119 days

below 100 days

G SCALE
2

70.79.99

below 70

65-69% of the students


attained an average of
75% proficiency in the
required competencies

60% of the students


attained an average of
75% proficiency in the
required competencies

1 Quarter

At the end of the school


year only

Observed 65-74% of the Observed 64% and below


teachers under your
of the teachers under your
supervision
supervision

65-74% suggestions/
recommendations given
have been excellently
demonstrated/ complied
with

64% suggestions/
recommendations given
have been excellently
demonstrated/ complied
with

Conferred with the teacher Conferred with the teacher


3 days after the
beyond 4 days after the
observation
observation

51-74% of the teachers 50% of the teachers under


under your supervision your supervision received
received mentoring/
mentoring/ coaching
coaching services
services

51-74% of the teachers


50% and below of the
under your supervision
teachers under your
have improved
supervision have improved

G SCALE
2

Submitted the TQC


outputs in 20 days after
the conduct of the TQC

Submitted the TQC


outputs a month after the
conduct of the TQC

70-79% of the number


69% of the number
teachers under your
teachers under your
supervision were
supervision were
evaluated based from the evaluated based from the
RPMS
RPMS

51-74% of the teachers 50% of the teachers under


under your supervision
your supervision
accomplished the IPCRF accomplished the IPCRF
with no error
with no error

Submitted the IPCRF


Submitted the IPCRF
outputs three days after outputs four or mored days
the due date
after the due date

65-74% of the lesson


plans were checked and
reviewed once a week

50% of the lesson plans


were checked and
reviewed once a week

Submitted the MTs


Submitted the MTs
accomplishment log once accomplishment log once
every end of the month
every end of the month

DIVISION

DISTRICT

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM


MASTER TEACHER I & II
NAME OF EMPLOYEE: ____________________________________
POSITION:
____________________________________
REVIEW PERIOD:
____________________________________
BUREAU/CENTER/SERVICE/DIVISION: _______________________

NAME OF RATEE:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW:

__________________
__________________
__________________

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING


MFO
Delivery of
Basic
Education

KRA's

Professional Growth
and Development

SBM PLAN
Professional Growth
and Development

II. Instructional
Competence 50%

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

WEIGHT PER
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
1. 100% trainings and seminars participated and
implemented fully within one week

Reecho seminars and trainings and prepare


Reentry Action Plan

June to March

2. Conduct a simple action research and


utilize the results to address school needs

June to March

10%

Conducted at least one simple action research within the


year

April to May

10%

Participate actively in all SBM planning /meeting of the


school head with the internal stakeholders

1. Participated in at 3 seminars, workshops


trainings

June to March

10%

Conducted at least one action research within the year

1. To carry regular teaching loads for the


grade/ subject area

June 2015 to March


2016

30%

Handles full teaching loads for the year.

2. To serve as facilitator/ resource person/


demonstration teacher.

Quarterly

10%

Conducts demonstrations teaching or serve as faclitator/


speaker/ lecturer in trainings and seminars.

3. To consolidate and interpret competency


assessment results for the improvement of
teaching and learning process.

Quarterly

10%

Consolidates and interprets competency and


assessment results 100% of the assigned classes
excellency at the end of every quarter.

1. Organize and update SBM within the year

10%

2. Created Performance Management Team

ACTUAL
RESULTS

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM


MASTER TEACHER I & II
NAME OF EMPLOYEE: ____________________________________
POSITION:
____________________________________
REVIEW PERIOD:
____________________________________
BUREAU/CENTER/SERVICE/DIVISION: _______________________

NAME OF RATEE:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW:

__________________
__________________
__________________

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING


MFO
Delivery of
Basic
Education
Services

KRA's

A. PROFESSIONAL
GROWTH &
DEVELOPMENT

1.1 Staff Development

1.2 Community & Allied


Services

B. INSTRUCTIONAL
COMPETENCIES

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

WEIGHT PER
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

A. Conducted at least 1 action research


related to school or classroom concerns

Aug. 2015- Feb. 2016

8%

Action research will be conducted and utilitzed by the


school wide with required evidences

B. Participated in atleast seminars,


workshops, trainings within a year

May 2015- April


2016

10%

3 seminar workshops/trainings for teachers in specific


learning area will be conducted

C. Received awards/recognitions within a


year

Sept. 2015- Feb.


2016

2%

D. Served as demonstration teacher

Sept. 2015- Feb.


2016

10%

2 demonstration lesson will be conducted

A. Handled teaching loads everyday

June 2015- April


2016

10%

100% required teaching loads will be handled for the


year

June 2015- April


2016

15%

100% will be achieved in student performance in MPS or


GSA

June 2015- April


2016

15%

100% of the required competencies in every quarter will


be achieved

B. Achieved atleast 75% of the student's


2.1 Student Development performance at the end of the school year
C. Attained 80% of the required learning
competencies for the students in every
quarter

ACTUAL
RESULTS

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

C. Attained 80% of the required learning


competencies for the students in every
quarter

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM


MASTER TEACHER I & II
NAME OF EMPLOYEE: ____________________________________
POSITION:
____________________________________
REVIEW PERIOD:
____________________________________
BUREAU/CENTER/SERVICE/DIVISION: _______________________

NAME OF RATEE:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW:

__________________
__________________
__________________

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING


MFO
Delivery of
Basic
Education
Services

KRA's

C. INSTRUCTIONAL
SUPERVISION

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

WEIGHT PER
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

D. Increased NAT performance by 3%

June 2015- April


2016

10%

5% will be increased in NAT

A. Observe 100% of the teachers every


quarter

July 2015- March


2016

10%

90-100% Accomplished quarterly observation forms for


teachers

B. Conduct at least 3 mentoring/oaching


activities with teacher quarterly

July 2015- Feb. 2016

5%

90-100 % documented mentoring/ coaching activities


were carried out by the teachers quarterly

C. Check regularly lesson plans of teachers


in the assigned grade level

July 2015- March


2016

15%

90-100% lesson plans/teaching logs of teachers were


checked

A. TEACHINGA. Prepared lesson plans/ daily logs of


LEARNING PROCESS activities including appropriate, adequate and June 2015- March
2016
updated instructional materials.

B. Initiated disciplines of students including


classroom rules, guidelines and individuals/
group talk

Lesson Plans - 15%


40%

Teaching Logs - 15%


Instructional Materials - 10%
Discipline - 5%

June 2015- March


2016

10%

Group & Individual Task - 5%

ACTUAL
RESULTS

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

B. Initiated disciplines of students including


classroom rules, guidelines and individuals/
group talk

June 2015- March


2016

10%

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM


MASTER TEACHER I & II
NAME OF EMPLOYEE: ____________________________________
POSITION:
____________________________________
REVIEW PERIOD:
____________________________________
BUREAU/CENTER/SERVICE/DIVISION: _______________________

NAME OF RATEE:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW:

__________________
__________________
__________________

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING


MFO

KRA's

Delivery of
Basic
Education
Services

B. PROFESSIONAL
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT

C. COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

WEIGHT PER
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
Monitoring attendance - 5%

C. Monitored attendance, diversity,


appreciation, safe, positive and motivating
environment, overall physical atmosphere,
cleanliness and orderliness of classrooms,
including proper waste disposal

June 2015-March
2016

10%

Cleanliness/ Orderliness - 5%

A. Participated in activities such as Teachers


seminars, trainings, workshops, different
associations like GPTA, Clubs, Faculty, etc.

June 2015- March


2016

20%

Participating in Teachers seminars, workshops, trainings


and different teachers asso.

B. Come in school on time and other


seminars/ trainings attended

June 2015- March


2016

10%

A. Participated in school/ Faculty programs,


and other outdoor activities

June 2015- March


2017

5%

Attending school/ Faculty programs, Brigada Eskwela,


seminars - 5%

B. Visited parents of students who needed


academic evaluation

June 2015- March


2016

5%

Home Visit - 5%

Punctuality - 10%

ACTUAL
RESULTS

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

B. Visited parents of students who needed


academic evaluation

June 2015- March


2016

5%

Home Visit - 5%

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM


MASTER TEACHER I & II
NAME OF EMPLOYEE: ____________________________________
POSITION:
____________________________________
REVIEW PERIOD:
____________________________________
BUREAU/CENTER/SERVICE/DIVISION: _______________________

NAME OF RATEE:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW:

__________________
__________________
__________________

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING


MFO
Delivery of
Basic
Education
Services

KRA's
D. PUPILS OUTCOME
30%

WEIGHT PER
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

July 2015- Feb 2016

10%

100% required teaching loads will be handled for the


year

B. Conducted at least 3 monitoring/coaching


July 2015- Feb 2016
activities with teacher quarterly

5%

100% will be achieved in student performance in MPS or


GSA

5%

100% of the required competencies in every quarter will


be achieved

OBJECTIVES
A. Observed 80% of the teacher every
quarter

C. Evaluated teacher performance twice a


year

TIMELINE

Sept. 2015- Feb.


2016

ACTUAL
RESULTS

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________

AVERAGE

RATING

SCORE

_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________

AVERAGE

RATING

SCORE

_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________

AVERAGE

RATING

SCORE

_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________

AVERAGE

RATING

SCORE

_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________

AVERAGE

RATING

SCORE

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM


RATING SCALE FOR MASTER TEACHER I & II
MAJOR FINAL
OUTCOMES

KEY RESULT AREA


(KRA)

OBJECTIVES

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

RATING SCALE
5

CALE
2