All Sites 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions

142,803 88,732 54,071 0 243,571 Percent Cost Savings, Estimated reduction USD Capital costs, from 2007 USD This column information incomplete: factory responses needed

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

3,000,611 1,334,868 1,447,611 218,132 6,907,027 0 0

2,233,706 1,109,399 925,046 199,261 5,659,249 0 4,460,746

6% 8% 6% 4%

$2,809,876 $2,496,138 $313,638 $100 $81,310

$773,045 $767,695 $5,000 $350 $48,000

283,673 194,285 72,196 17,192 5,748,446 0 0 35,144 21,704 13,440

See individual 221,870 factory tabs 160,009 47,256 for project 14,605 descriptions 4,813,324
0 0 26,988 16,427 10,561

13,891 11,317 2,575 0 144,189

6% 7% 5% 3%

489 489 0

2%

$50,000

Total

$2,941,187

$821,045

Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled 50,102 17,705 32,397 0 46,477

Americas Region Percent Cost reduction Savings, from 2007 USD

Estimated Capital costs, USD

Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions 41,522 19,848 21,674 0 33,310

EMEAI East Region Percent Cost reduction Savings, from 2007 USD

EMEAI West R Estimated Capital costs, USD Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions 23,487 23,487 0 0 133,822

6% 4% 8% 12%

$680,430 $422,644 $257,786 $0 $61,350

$253,500 $248,500 $5,000 $0 $0

13% 15% 14% 19%

$461,349 $405,497 $55,852 $0 $7,880

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

5,483 4,015 1,468 0 0

6% 6% 7% 0%

2,782 1,675 1,107 0 10,328

11% 11% 14% 13%

3,336 3,336 0 0 128,462

0 0 0

0%

$50,000

0 0 0 $253,500

0%

113 113 0 $469,228 $0

Total

$791,779

EMEAI West Region Percent Cost reduction Savings, from 2007 USD

Estimated Capital costs, USD

Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions 27,692 27,692 0 0 29,962

Asia / Pac Region Percent Cost reduction Savings, from 2007 USD

Estimated Capital costs, USD

3% 8% 0% 3%

$993,421 $993,421 $0 $0 $0

$33,000 $33,000 $0 $0 $0

8% 15% 0% 7%

$673,577 $673,577 $0 $0 $10,581

$486,195 $486,195 $0 $0 $48,000

6% 9% 0% 3%

2,291 2,291 0 0 5,399

5% 6% 0% 2%

1%

376 376 0 $993,421 $33,000

6%

$684,158

$534,195

Americas Region 2005 Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Water, GHGs, or reduction from Waste Reductions 2007 50,102 17,705 32,397 0 46,477 6% 4% 8% 12% Cost Savings, USD

1,336,492 553,973 782,519 0 812,410 0 0

881,681 479,149 402,532 0 385,252 0 0

$680,430 $422,644 $257,786 $0 $61,350

120,470 80,437 40,033 0 387,766 0 0 16,496 9,922 6,574

See individual 88,950 factory tabs 68,384 20,566 for project 0 descriptions 128,408
0 0 10,920 7,087 3,833

5,483 4,015 1,468 0 0

6% 6% 7% 0%

0 0 0

0%

$50,000

Total

$791,779

Estimated Capital costs, USD $253,500 $248,500 $5,000 $0 $0

$253,500

EMEAI EAST Sites 2005 Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Water, GHGs, or reduction from Waste Reductions 2007 41,522 19,848 21,674 0 33,310 13% 15% 14% 19% Cost Savings, USD

321,254 134,866 141,493 44,895 223,593 0 0

329,715 131,103 154,812 43,800 177,437 0 0

$462,449 $406,497 $55,852 $100 $9,380

26,065 15,710 7,227 3,128 62,227 0 0 1,467 945 523

See individual 26,190 factory tabs 15,231 7,907 for project 3,052 descriptions 76,923
0 0 1,071 697 374

2,782 1,675 1,107 0 10,328

11% 11% 14% 13%

0 0 0

0%

Total

$471,828

Estimated Capital costs, USD $350 $0 $0 $350 $0

$350

Asia/Pac Region 2005 Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Water, GHGs, or reduction from Waste Reductions 2007 27,692 27,692 0 0 29,962 8% 15% 0% 7% Cost Savings, USD

403,797 239,534 17,902 146,361 489,676 0 0

344,110 190,726 11,530 141,854 442,679 0 0

$673,577 $673,577 $0 $0 $10,581

62,828 49,692 914 12,222 277,320 0 0 6,706 4,011 2,695

See individual 50,687 factory tabs 39,493 589 for project 10,605 descriptions 261,600
0 0 6,335 3,409 2,926

2,291 2,291 0 0 5,399

5% 6% 0% 2%

376 376 0

6%

Total

$684,158

Estimated Capital costs, USD $486,195 $486,195 $0 $0 $48,000

$534,195

EMEAI WEST Sites 2005 Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Water, GHGs, or reduction from Waste Reductions 2007 23,487 23,487 0 0 133,822 3% 8% 0% 3% Cost Savings, USD

939,068 406,495 505,697 26,876 5,381,348 0 0

682,366 312,587 356,172 13,607 4,653,881 0 4,460,746

$993,421 $993,421 $0 $0 $0

74,310 48,446 24,022 1,842 5,021,133 0 0 10,474 6,826 3,648

See individual 56,043 factory tabs 36,901 18,194 for project 948 descriptions 4,346,393
0 0 8,662 5,233 3,428

3,336 3,336 0 0 128,462

6% 9% 0% 3%

113 113 0

1%

Total

$993,421

Estimated Capital costs, USD $33,000 $33,000 $0 $0 $0

$33,000

Antipolo City 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Percent reduction from 2007 Cost savings, USD

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

28,562 22,162

27,830 21,011 total electrical reduction New boiler installation - site reports this as project for 2008 Lighting: install an automatic light flux regulator Improve monitoring of chillers efficiency Install VSD drives for boiler air blower controlled by flue monitor Control Dissolved Oxygen content in WWTP and close loop blowers MCC improvement (autamatic stop of motion if not required) Reduction of Air Compressed usage in production (empty bags) Close cooling tunnels ducts (open on top). Increase mainteinance of motors Energy monitoring and targeting on steam consumption install meters for key users Monitor steam production and efficiency of the boilers Pre-heat of combustion air through effluent flue gas economizer a) Pre-heat of make-up water through effluent flue gas economizer b) Solar water heating of hot water Condensate collection completion to 100% (now is 80%) Coating pan water after washing: flush through a heat exchanger to pre heat cleaning water itself or domestic water Improve efficiency of Boilers through correct pressure dimensioning

8346 8346 3941 18 23 551 233 21 89 89

30% $311,019 40% $311,019 19% $200,666 0% 0% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% $917 $1,171 $28,056 $11,864 $1,069 $4,532 $4,532

1141

5%

19,665

1744 496

8% 2%

30,000 8,549

Blow down of Boiler to pre-heat make-up water Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled 0 6,400 14,343 0 6,819 17,512

3,272 2,826 0 446 8,709

3,154 2,679 New boiler installation - as est by site 0 475 7,431

1238 1238

46% 46%

1,002 738 264

850 592 258 Total cost savings $311,019

electricity cost 1 PHG =$ 0.025

7.3 PHP/KWH

Estimated Budgeted PAR Is the metric for this Capital for in 2008? approved? initiative well costs, Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No USD

Does your location have the means of measuring the metric? Yes/No

Date Started or Estimeted Staring Date

Date Finished or Estimated Finish date

Name of the person responsible for this initiative

$213,370 $213,370

$0 $63,870 $28,000

$500

$35,000

$70,000 $16,000

$213,370 Total Capital

Is this "on going" or "one time" effort?

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Asquith 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent reduction Water, GHGs, or from 2007 Waste Reductions

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

47159 29,257

Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal

17,902 0 22,814

34,064 22,534 factory commitment to 5% reduction in energy use. Calc value by factory is 2048 GJ 11,530 0 19,055 factory commitment to 5% reduction in water use. Calc value by factory is 1140 m3

2048 2048

6%

1140 1140

6%

Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions

7777 6,863

Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed

914 0 16,373

5,875 5,286 factory commitment to 5% reduction in emissions. Calc value by factory is 440 CO2 equiv. 589 0 11,036

440 440

7%

871 575

547 290 factory commitment to 5% reduction in waste. Calc value by factory is 41.42 tonnes

41.42 41.42

8%

Waste Recycled

296

257 factory commitment to increase recycling by 10% total cost savings

2007 values for inputs and outputs are based on Jan- Sept data electricity cost 0.1 AUD/KWH water cost 0.01 AUD/gallon 1 AUD = 0.9 USD

Cost savings, Estimated Budgeted PAR Is the metric for this USD Capital for in 2008? approved? initiative well costs, Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No USD $54,134 $51,425 0

Does your location have the means of measuring the metric? Yes/No

Date Started or Estimeted Staring Date

Date Finished or Estimated Finish date

$2,709 $2,709

$56,843

0 Total Capital

Name of the person responsible for this initiative

Is this "on going" or "one time" effort?

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Baddi 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Water, GHGs, or reduction Waste Reductions from 2007 Cost savings, USD

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

49,499 15,746

46,553 15,421 Total Electrical reduction 1. Install overhead water storage tanks to eliminate cotinuous pumping in toilets and canteen 2. Recycle vacuum pump water back to cooling tower 3. Replace AC plant with high efficiency units and close loop control Rectify distribution lines of Compressed Air Reduce leakages by installing segm. valves and monitoring VSD in air compressors Better insulation of all building Better insulation of curing rooms Shading HVAC condensers Better mainteinance of cooling tunnel 2 JOT Substitute decentralized units with a new centralized chilled water unit Improve efficiency of water pumping system Install automatic "too full" control for treated water tanks Install electronic ballasts on 2x40 W tubes Complete condensate return - part B Substitute boiler with smaller more efficient boiler

4652 4652 171 342 427 72 179 628 424 21 215 53 1897 15 1 202 5

10% 30% 1% 2% 3% 0% 1% 4% 3% 0% 1% 0% 12% 0% 0% 1% 0%

$116,812 $116,812 $4,294 $8,588 $10,722 $1,808 $4,495 $15,769 $10,647 $527 $5,399 $1,331 $47,634 $377 $25 $5,072 $126

Eliminate leakages by continuous monitoring and maint. Complete condensate return - part A + B (only in $ sav) Insulate thermically the condensate tank Solar heating of boiler make-up water Waste heat recovery from DGs Waste heat recovery from Incinerator Solar water heating of process raw water Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well 0 33,753 71,709 0 31,132 52,857 1. Install overhead water storage tanks to eliminate continuous pumping in toilets & canteen thereby reducing the flow of water waste. 2. Vacuum pump water to be recycled back to spare cooling tower.

18750 18750

35%

Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

0

6,488 4,136 0 2,352 0

6,220 4,051 assume 2% reduction 0 2,169 0

123

2%

61 61 0

186 186 0 total savings $116,812

electricity cost: I INR =

3.6 INR/KWH 0.025 USD

water cost unknown

Estimated Budgeted for PAR approved? Is the metric for this Capital in 2008? Yes/No initiative well defined? costs, Yes/No Yes/No USD 0

Does your location have the means of measuring the metric? Yes/No

Date Started or Estimeted Staring Date

Date Finished or Estimated Finish date

Name of the person responsible for this initiative

0 total capital

Is this "on going" or "one time" effort?

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Bangalore 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Water, GHGs, or reduction from Waste Reductions 2007 Cost savings, USD

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

18,167 7,025

19,834 7,166
Installation of Power factor Controller panel to improve the existing power factor from 0.89 to 0.99. The project includes design a power factor controller, manufacture at supplier end and install at our site.

1920 1920

10% 27%

$66,960 $66,960

Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

0 11,142 22,396

0 12,668 . 20,543

2,622 1,846 0 776 4,616

2,765 1,882 assume 25% reduction 0 883 3,152

471 471

25% 25%

97 15 82

70 29 41 total savings $66,960

electricity cost: I INR =

5 INR/KWH 0.025 USD

Estimated Budgeted for Capital in 2008? costs, Yes/No USD 0

PAR Is the metric for this approved initiative well defined? ? Yes/No Yes/No

Does your location have the Date Started or means of measuring the metric? Estimeted Staring Yes/No Date

Date Finished or Name of the Estimated Finish person responsible date for this initiative

0 total capital

Is this "on going" or "one time" effort?

Percent completed: Major Issues Overall Status for this Not Started, 25%, or challenges Initiative: Green, Yellow, 50%, 75%, Finished Red

Biesheim 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Percent Cost savings, reduction from USD 2007

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well

278,703 119,850 158,385 468 5,134,607

199,201 92,525 106,676 0 4,460,746 4,460,746 Factory reports a 3% reduction goal for 2008

133,822 133,822

3% water cost is free

Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

11,035 2,905 8,127 3 4,929,222

7,692 2,243 5,449 0 4,282,056 assume 3% reduction in wastewater too

128,462 128,462 27 27

3%

3,537 2,640 897

4,538 2,977 Factory reports 0.9% goal of waste reduction for 2008 1,561

1%

total savings

0

Estimated Budgeted for in Capital 2008? Yes/No costs, USD

PAR approved? Yes/No

Is the metric for Does your location Date Started or this initiative have the means of Estimeted Staring well defined? measuring the metric? Date Yes/No Yes/No

Date Finished or Name of the Estimated Finish person responsible date for this initiative

0 total capital

Is this "on going" or "one time" effort?

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Chattanooga 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Water, GHGs, or reduction from Waste Reductions 2007

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

268,493 75,549

195,775 81,351 total electric reduction
1. Leakage control for compressed air 2. Upgrade air compressor control system 3. Heat recovery from air compressors 4. Optimisation of compressed air distribution system 5. Optimisation of chilled water system operation 6. Implement an energy management system 114,424 Total Gas reduction

36434 6944 1792

19% 9% 2%

672 4480

1% 6%

Natural Gas consumption

192,944

1. Install feedwater economisers on steam boilers 2. Control excess air in steam lines by managing oxygen; 3. Insulate steam valves & fittings 4. Inspect and repair steam traps on a regular basis 5. Implement an energy management system Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 0 138,450 0 113,835

29490 14557 3586 2769 8578

26% 13% 3% 2% 7%

22,049

19,521

2556

13%

Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

12,137 9,912 0 101,841

13,676 Assume equivalent to electrical

reduction percent reduction in GHG 11% reduction percent reduction in GHG 18%

1504 1052

11% 18%

5,845 Assume equivalent to natural gas 0 59,364

2,132 1,443 689

2,223 369 1,854 total savings

P2E2 study info

electricity cost: USD/KWH gas cost = Estimated Investment

Facility

Area

Opportunity

GJ

Therms

kWh

Chattanooga Chattanooga Chattanooga

Steam Steam Steam

Chattanooga Chattanooga Chattanooga

Steam Air Air

Install feedwater economisers on steam boilers Control excess air by managing oxygen Insulate steam valves & fittings Inspect and repair steam traps on a regular basis Leakage control for compressed air Upgrade air compressor control system

138,000 34,000 26,250 5,000

81,320 500,000 30,000

Chattanooga

Air

Chattanooga Chattanooga

Air CWS

Chattanooga Chattanooga

Man Supply

Heat recovery from air compressor Optimisation of compressed air distribution system Optimisation of chilled water system operation Implement an energy management system Improve power factor to elimate kVArh penalty

25,000

187,500 1,250,000

25,000 50,000

100,000

Cost savings, Estimated Budgeted PAR USD Capital costs, for in 2008? approved? USD Yes/No Yes/No

Is the metric for Does your location Date Started or Estimeted Date Finished or this initiative well have the means of Staring Date Estimated Finish date defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? Yes/No

$381,690 $155,243 $29,998 $17,000 $12,000 $11,249 $74,995 $10,000 $226,448 $111,780

$145,000 $140,000 $0 $30,000 $25,000 $25,000 $50,000 $10,000 $5,000

$5,000 $27,536 $0 $21,263 $0 $65,869

$381,690

$145,000 total capital

Local currency

Projected Projected Saving (local Saving currency) (USD)

USD USD USD

100,000 15,000 11,025

### $15,000 $11,025

USD USD USD

35,000 28,000 17,000

$35,000 $28,000 $17,000

USD

12,000

$12,000

USD USD

10,500 70,000

$10,500 $70,000

USD USD

100,000 16,800

### $16,800

Name of the person responsible for this initiative

Is this "on going" or "one time" effort?

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Gainesville 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Cost Estimated Water, GHGs, or reduction from savings, Capital Waste Reductions 2007 USD costs, USD 0 KWH reduction need to quantified 0% $61,350 0

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

315,964 162,692

358,786 209,198 Enthalpy Control System project for each Munters unit to provide conditioned process air to 6 Driams. This control will provide 25% fresh make up outside air to the Munters and 75% re-circulated return conditioned air. Current system provides 100% outside air which needs to be conditioned. Result of the enthalpy control is that the chill water load will be reduced by 50 tons refrigeration per Driam which totals out to 300 tons reduced chill water load. Thusly, one 277 ton Trane Chiller Yard Unit will be idled through out the year. 149,588 0 144,786 something that accidentally got erased Water effluent re-use Written water conervation plan Cooling tower replace Dishwater replacement Reuse base pellet cooling H20 Install driam washout controls Upgrade washing machine

Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3

153,272 0 126,792

46,477 2273 37879 947 1894 227 1894 1136 227 1031 840 191

32%

$61,350 $3,000 $50,000 $1,250 $2,500 $300 $2,500 $1,500 $300

0

Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed

33,966 26,137 7,829 0 26,285

41,250 33,608 Per P2E2 assessment, assume 5% total E savings split between electricity and natural gas 7,642 0 51,294

6% 3% 2%

5,892 3,541

6,221 5,068

Waste Recycled

2,351

1,152 total savings $122,699 0

electricity cost: water cost

0.06 USD/KWH 0.01 USD/gallon

Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for Does your location have Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the person in 2008? approved? this initiative well the means of Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish date responsible for this Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? Date initiative Yes/No

Is this "on going" or "one time" effort?

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

total Capital

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Guangzhou 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Percent reduction from 2007 Cost savings, USD

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

168,144 98,305

111,271 65,225 1. improve efficiency on chiller system condenser; 2. Cool fresh air munter/chiller systeml. Factory estimates 2.5% energy reduction 0 46,046 115,366 Reuse steam condensate and install low flow faucets. Factory estimates 5.2% reduction

1925 1925

3.0% 3.0%

$46,005 $44,046

Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal

0 69,839 129,852

5999 5999

5.2% 5.2%

$1,959 $1,959

Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP

30,238 23,346 0 6,892 112,035

20,033 15,490 0 4,543 103,829 Based on water conservation, expect 5.2% reduction in effluent

5399

5%

To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones 2,514 2,282

Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

1,035 1,479

721 1,561 total savings $47,964

electricity cost:

0.59 CNY/KWH 0.139 USD 1 CNY= water cost 0.0089 CNY/gallon

Estimated Capital costs, USD

Budgeted PAR Is the metric for this for in approved? initiative well defined? 2008? Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No

Does your location have the means of measuring the metric? Yes/No

Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the Is this "on Percent Estimeted Staring Estimated person responsible going" or "one completed: Not Date Finish date for this initiative time" effort? Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

$140,000 $140,000

$28,000 $28,000

$168,000 total capital

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Nairobi 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Percent reduction from 2007 Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Cost Estimated Budgeted for in PAR Is the metric Does your Date Date Name of the Is this "on going" Percent completed: savings, Capital 2008? Yes/No approved? for this location have Started or Finished or person or "one time" Not Started, 25%, USD costs, Yes/No initiative well the means of Estimeted Estimated responsible for effort? 50%, 75%, Finished USD defined? measuring the Staring Date Finish date this initiative Yes/No metric? Yes/No 7600 1000 1000 tbd tbd tbd 5% of 2007 in this loss area 500 5% of 2007 in this loss area 1000 5% of 2007 in this lossarea 1200 tbd tbd tbd tbd tbd 2% of 2007 in this loss area 2% of 2007 in this loss area 2% of 2007 in this loss area 1% of 2007 in this loss area 2% of 2007 in this loss area 1500 1300 1500 1500 No 6000 1000 nil No No yes No yes No No No No May-08 Jun-08 Apr-08 Apr-08 End 2008 End 2008 Samuel /James End 2008 Samuel /James End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Not started Not started Not started 1500 No No yes No May-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started Measurement per location/user dept nil No No yes No Apr-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started Measurement per location/user dept nil No No yes No Apr-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started Measurement per location/user dept Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

24,793 24,793

9,520 9,520 Shut offf all non needed equipment Isolate compressed air to departments during weekend Replace static air losses in the network by repairing leaks Isolate production areas(air conditioned) from warehouse Introduce Day lighting for warehouse by changing roof type

to be determined tbd

5% 5% of 2007 in this loss area 5% of 2007 in this loss area

nil nil

No No

No No

yes yes

No No

Apr-08 Apr-08

End 2008 Samuel /James End 2008 Samuel /James

Ongoing Ongoing

Not started Not started

Measurement per location/user dept Measurement per location/user dept

Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption

0 0

0 0

Re use munters condensate as boiler feed water Improve oil consumption of main boilers through efficient burner management Install exhaust gas economiser to the boiler Insulation of all steam and hot water pipes

100

350

No

No

yes

No

May-08

End 2008 Samuel /James

Ongoing

Not started

Quantity too little oil meters, chemical metering,low cost fuel not available exhaust gas quantity limitation

Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

2,007 13,519

40 Seal all leak points and accurate metering

unreliable municipal water supply ,

1,813 1,813 0 0 0

696 696 Assume reduction by 5% 0 0 0

0 tbd 5% of 2007 in this loss area nil No No yes No Apr-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started flue gas measurement tools, consultancy expensive

No project conceptualised this year , but intend to keep tbd to 2007 level 15 15 0 6 6 reduction in floor sugar at sheeting 0

5% of 2007 in this loss area nil yes No Samuel /James Ongoing Not started

50% total savings 4.4Ksh/kwh 0.0155 USD

4000 13100

1000 9850 total capital

Electricity cost 1 Ksh=

NFI 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Water, GHGs, or reduction from Waste Reductions 2007 Cost Estimated savings, Capital USD costs, USD $5,381 $2,615 0

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

22,073 5,310

Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions

16,763 0 3,957

17,893 4,166 Per P2E2 assessment, assume 5% total E savings split between electricity and natural gas 13,727 0 4,804

447 104

5% 3%

343

3%

$2,765

1,709 853

Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

856 0 2,440

1,370 669 Per P2E2 assessment, assume 5% total E savings split between electricity and natural gas 701 0 2,340

34 17

5% 3%

18

3%

271 58 213

256 50 206 total savings $5,381 0

electricity cost:

0.09 USD/KWH

gas cost

0.85 USD/therm

Budgeted PAR Is the metric for Does your location have Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the person Is this "on going" or Percent completed: for in 2008? approved? this initiative well the means of Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish responsible for this "one time" effort? Not Started, 25%, Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? Date date initiative 50%, 75%, Finished Yes/No

total capital

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Panyu 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Percent reduction from 2007

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

68,341 36,324

70,164 35,094 Site reports 5% energy reduction target by: 1. Leakage reduction of compressed air; 2.Steam leakage reduction; 3.Optimize environmental temp and humidity in working area; 4.Convertor control in air-compressor; 5.Upgrade lights to lower engergy consumption type; 6. Air conditioner replacement

3508 3508

5%

Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal

0 0 32,017 35,070 181,100 161,135 Site reports 10% water consumption decrease by: 1.Reuse of vacuum pump water 150T/Day; 2.Reuse of waste water from purity-water station to water the plant; 3.Install sub-meter for main water outlet to measure consumption;

16114

10%

Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal

10,857 8,627 0 2,230 63,305

7,808 5,978 related to energy reduction above, assume same percent reduction in indirect emissions - 5% 0 1,830 53,921

390 390

5%

Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

424 165 259

994 50 5% 598 Site reports 5% target in waste reduction by reducing the quantity of gum that is destroyed 50 396 total savings

electricity cost: 1 CNY= water cost

0.7 CNY/KWH 0.139 USD 0.01 CNY/gallon

Cost Estimated Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for this savings, Capital in 2008? approved? initiative well USD costs, Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No USD

Does your location Date Started or Date Finished or have the means of Estimeted Staring Date Estimated Finish measuring the metric? date Yes/No

Name of the person responsible for this initiative

$101,144 $95,231

$30,000 $30,000

$5,913

$20,000 $20,000

$107,057

$50,000 total capital

Is this "on going" or "one time" effort?

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Plymouth 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Percent reduction from 2007

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

180,291 88,186

170,233 90,029 Total electrical reduction
Fix Compressed air leaks Switch off all nonessential equipment when not needed and during weekends Adjust site voltage - turn down tapings on 11,000 volt transformer from 432volt 3 phase to 420v, 3 phase

20,265 20265 8163 7156 4946

12% 23%

Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

92,105 0 62,876

80,204 0 53,725

16,214 11,488 4,726 0 18,002

15,825 11,728 assume 23% reduction 4,097 0 6,176

2697 2697

17%

2,086 1,448 638

2,402 1,830 572 total savings

electricity cost: 1 GBP

0.08 GBP/KWH 1.96 USD

Cost Estimated Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for Does your location savings,USD Capital in 2008? approved? this initiative well have the means of costs, Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? USD Yes/No 0 $886,537

Date Started or Estimeted Staring Date

Date Finished or Estimated Finish date

Name of the person Is this "on responsible for this going" or "one initiative time" effort?

$886,537

0 total capital

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Poznan 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Cost Water, GHGs, or reduction from savings, Waste Reductions 2007 USD

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed

376,822 163,601 213,221 0 126,191

284,117 114,825 installation of Power Purge dessicant dehumidification unit 169,292 0 101,159

3222 3222

3% $106,884 3% $106,884

41,296 30,355 10,941 0 73,909

29,953 21,305 8,648 0 58,161

639 639

3% 3%

2,263 522

1,722 426 Waste generation reduction by 5% for 2008. Process will consist of a combination of employee training and supervision, process/equipment modification, better housekeeping, and increased waste segregation. 1,295

86 86

5%

Waste Recycled

1,741

total savings

$106,884

electricity cost: 1 PLN

0.29 PLN/KWH 0.41 USD

Estimated Capital costs, USD $33,000 $33,000

Budgeted PAR Is the metric for Does your location have Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the Is this "on going" for in approved? this initiative well the means of Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish person responsible or "one time" 2008? Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? Date date for this initiative effort? Yes/No Yes/No

$33,000 total capital

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Santiaga 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Percent reduction from 2007 Cost Estimated savings, Capital USD costs, USD

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

56,733 14,625 41,986 122 7,093

0 0 0 0 0

1,798 1,562 228 8 0

0 0 0 0

1,136 878 258

0 0 0 total savings 0 0

Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for Does your location have Date Started or in 2008? approved? this initiative the means of measuring Estimeted Staring Yes/No Yes/No well defined? the metric? Yes/No Date Yes/No

Date Finished or Estimated Finish date

Name of the person Is this "on going" responsible for this or "one time" initiative effort?

total capital

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Shanghai 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Cost Water, GHGs, or reduction from savings, Waste Reductions 2007 USD

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

41,293 28,066

55,466 29,706 Total electrical reduction
1. Install submeters on electricity and steam pipe 2. Reduce electric consumption from Montes Chiller operation 3. Reduce steam consumption on jacket water system 4. Check compressed to eliminate leaks Reduce pressure of compressed air lines Heat recovery from air compressors Use high efficiency blow guns Minimize starting and stopping of production lines Reduce steam generation pressure Split driam area into two sections Install feedwater economizers on steam boilers Improve insulation of steam pipes, valves and fittings

10,594 10,594

$148,140 $148,140

358 752 2,862 16 470 1,923 2,067 1,466 680

$9,739 $20,289 $28,405 $460 $2,001 $19,072 $47,209 $14,202 $6,763

Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions

0 13,227 74,478

0 25,760 98,972

4,499 3,578 0

8,850 7,055 0

Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

921 67,030

1,795 81,872 Run WWTP, reduce BOD discharge into environment

599 403 196

857 573 284 total savings $148,140

Estimated Capital costs, USD $102,825 $102,825

Budgeted PAR Is the metric for Does your location have Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the person Is this "on going" for in approved? this initiative the means of measuring Estimeted Estimated Finish responsible for this or "one time" 2008? Yes/No well defined? the metric? Yes/No Staring Date date initiative effort? Yes/No Yes/No

$1,082 $0 $27,052 $974 $0 $0 $16,231 $40,578 $16,908

$102,825 total capital

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Silao 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Percent reduction from 2007 Cost savings, USD

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

66,104 33,326

63,749 32,552 Total electrical reduction 1. Inspect and repair compressed air leaks 2. Use high efficiency air blow guns 3. Install additional receiver tank capacity 4. Implement an energy management system

4543 1979 268 14 62 1635 2564 1669 265 630

7% 6% 1% 0% 0% 5% 8% 5% 1% 2%

$99,948 $71,375 $9,666 $505 $2,236 $58,968 $28,573 $18,599 $2,953 $7,021

Natural Gas consumption

32,778

31,197 Total gas reduction 1. Install (feedwater) economizers on steam and hot water boilers 2. Improve insulation in boiler house 3. Install an automatic blowdown system

Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions

0 40,292

0 44,159

6,531 4,857

6,338 4,744 Assume equivalent reduction in electrical GHG as in comsuption 10%

681 474

11% 10%

Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

1,674 0 10,407

1,594 Assume equivalent reduction in gas GHG as in comsuption - 13% 0 15,236

207

13%

1,536 1,099 437

912 702 211 total savings $99,948

electricity cost: 1 MXN gas cost P2E2 Study info

1.39 MXN/KWH 0.093 USD 12.64 MXN/Therm

Facility

Area

Opportunity
Install (feedwater) economizers on steam and hot water boilers Improve insulation in boiler house Install an automatic blowdown system Inspect and repair compressed air leaks Use high efficiency air blow guns Install additional receiver tank capacity

GJ

Therms

kWh

Estimated Local Investment currency

Silao Silao Silao Silao Silao Silao

Steam Steam Steam Air Air Air

1669 265 630

463,611 73,611 175,000 75,000 3,900 18,750

MXN MXN MXN MXN MXN MXN

Silao

Man

Implement an energy management system

1863

456,260

100,000 MXN

Estimated Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for this Does your location Capital in 2008? approved? initiative well defined? have the means of costs, USD Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No measuring the metric? Yes/No

Date Started or Estimeted Staring Date

Date Finished or Name of the person Estimated Finish responsible for this date initiative

Is this "on going" or "one time" effort?

$9,300 $9,300 $0 $0 $0 $9,300 $0

$9,300 total capital

Projected Saving (local currency)

Projected Saving (USD)

155,232 24,621 58,550 86,250 4,485 21,563

$14,258 $2,261 $5,378 $7,922 $412 $1,981

697,953

$64,108

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

St. Petersburg 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Percent reduction from 2007 Cost savings, USD

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

228,795 87,302

249,642 94,830 Site has not reported any projects but has reported that their goal for 2008 is to keep electricity consumption/MSSU equal to 2007 levels. Production FOB for 2008 is 14% greater than 2007 so assume electricity use will be reduced by 14% as well. 154,812 Site has not reported any projects but has reported that their goal for 2008 is to keep gas consumption/MSSU equal to 2007 levels. Production FOB for 2008 is 14% greater than 2007 so assume gas use will be reduced by 14% as well.

34,950 13,276

14% $285,457 14% $221,725

Natural Gas consumption

141,493

21,674

14%

$55,852

Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal

0 0 115,969 103,997 Site has not reported any projects but has reported that their goal for 2008 is to keep water consumption/MSSU equal to 2007 levels. Production FOB for 2008 is 14% greater than 2007 so assume water use will be reduced by 14% as well.

14,560 14,560

14% 14%

$7,880 $7,880

Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions

15,142 7,915

16,509 8,602 assume 14%

2311 1204

14%

Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

7,227 0 57,611

7,907 assume 14% 0 73,771 assume 14%

1107 10328 14%

1,295 854 441

995 662 333 total savings $293,336

electricity cost:

1.46 RUB/KWH 0.041 USD 1 RUB gas cost 6.63 RUB/therm water cost 0.05 RUB/gallon

Per site, projects include:

Keep current positive trend in Energy consumption despite extensive growth of the production volume in 2008 due to 3rd stage of the Factory Expansion Other comments: Use high-efficiency utilities equipment, Install manufacturing line of the new generation Continue with various energy saving initiatives (e.g. dry coolers, timers for lighting in office etc).

Estimated Capital costs, USD

Budgeted PAR Is the metric for this for in approved? initiative well defined? 2008? Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No

Does your location Date Started or Date Finished Name of the person Is this "on going" or have the means of Estimeted or Estimated responsible for this "one time" effort? measuring the metric? Staring Date Finish date initiative Yes/No

0

0 total capital

pansion

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Taipei 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Percent reduction from 2007 Cost savings, USD Estimated Capital costs, USD 0

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

50,298 25,420 0 24,878 67,089

45,315 17,156 Isolation of area to keep cool air 0 28,159 30,639 Leakage prevention

1271 1271

3% 7%

$23,716 $23,716

6709

22%

6,185 4,452 0 1,733 9,868

4,967 3,005 related to reduced electrical consumption, assum 5% 0 1,962 3,511

223 223

4% 7%

1,296 1,095 201

805 635 Wrapping materials reuse 170

285 285

35% 35% total savings $23,716 0

electricity cost:

2.09 TWD/KWH 0.0321 USD 1TWD water cost ??? Free maybe

Budgeted PAR Is the metric for for in 2008? approved? this initiative Yes/No Yes/No well defined? Yes/No

Does your location have the means of measuring the metric? Yes/No

Date Started or Estimeted Staring Date

Date Finished or Estimated Finish date

Name of the person responsible for this initiative

Is this "on going" or "one time" effort?

total capital

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Tarazona 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Cost Estimated Water, GHGs, or reduction from savings, Capital Waste Reductions 2007 USD costs, USD

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

46,519 20,233 0 26,286 50,581

28,815 15,208 0 13,607 38,251

3,967 2,136 0 1,831 0

2,573 1,625 0 948 0

1,452.01 1,338.01 114

0 0 0 total savings 0 0

Budgeted PAR for in approved? 2008? Yes/No Yes/No

Is the metric for Does your location Date Started or Date Finished or this initiative well have the means of Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? Date date Yes/No

Name of the Is this "on going" or person responsible "one time" effort? for this initiative

total capital

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Toronto 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Percent reduction from 2007 Cost savings, USD

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

120,142 78,777

Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs

41,365 0 57,925

127,791 85,128 Total Electrical reduction 1. Implement an energy management system 2. Implement compressed air leakage control programme 3. Install HF ballasts 4. Switch off LEVs during non-production times Turn off lights in offices when not in use Shut down equipment during down hours Shut down chiller during winter Install submeters to identify high energy use areas and develop reduction plans Optimize capacity of chiller water Install auto light switches and programmable thermostats 42,663 0 49,057

1582 1582

1% 2%

$35,028 $35,028

1201 298 83 tbd tbd tbd tbd

1% 0% 0%

$26,592 $6,598 $1,838

tbd tbd 0%

Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed

6,705 4,592 2,113 0 43,480

7,142 4,963 2,179 0

0

0% 0% 0%

3,109 1,972

Waste Recycled

1,137

829 421 Eliminate styrofoam, cans and bottles Reduce paper to landfill Eliminate use of plastics in small ingredient prep study ways to minimize gum waste to landfill 408 Study recycling program to id improvement opportunities Improve segregation of wastes to optimize recycling Investigage recycling of dust collector powder total savings $35,028

electricity cost: 1 CAD P2E2 Study info

0.08 CAD/KWH 0.992 USD

Facility

Area

Opportunity
Implement an energy management system

GJ

Therms

kWh

Estimated Local Investment currency

Toronto

Man

100,000 CND

Toronto Toronto Toronto

Air Lighting Process

Implement compressed air leakage control programme Install HF ballasts Switch off LEVs during nonproduction times

335,028 83,080 23,166

-

CND CND CND

Estimated Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for this Does your location Date Started or Date Finished or Capital in 2008? approved? initiative well have the means of Estimeted Estimated Finish costs, USD Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? Staring Date date Yes/No $99,200 $99,200 $99,200 $0 $0 $0

Name of the person responsible for this initiative

Is this "on going" or "one time" effort?

$99,200 total capital

Projected Saving (local currency)

Projected Saving (USD)

100,000

$98,789

27,081 6,715 1,873

$26,753 $6,634 $1,850

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Yorkville 2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Water, GHGs, or Waste Reductions Percent reduction from 2007 Cost Estimated Budgeted savings, Capital for in 2008? USD costs, Yes/No USD 0

Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption

75,898 117,687 46,976 66,754 Site reports 2008 project to replace air compressor which will save an estimated 1.98 million kWh - translates into 7096 GJ of electricity saved 28,922 0 25,389 50,933 0 28,611

7096 7096

11% $158,383 11% $158,383

Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions

0%

9,024 7,547

Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled

1,477 0 540

10,724 Based on electrical savings, assume 11% reduction in indirect emissions 2,605 0 174

1180 1180

11% 11%

0%

577 268 309

479 477 2 sell dust collector reclaimed dusts to Pullman Sugar rather than giving it to FWS total savings

$50,000 revenue generated $208,383 0 total capital

electricity cost:

0.08 USD/KWH

PAR Is the metric for this approved? initiative well defined? Yes/No Yes/No

Does your location have the means of measuring the metric? Yes/No

Date Started or Estimeted Staring Date

Date Finished or Estimated Finish date

Name of the person responsible for this initiative

Is this "on going" or "one time" effort?

Percent completed: Not Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Finished

Major Issues or challenges

Overall Status for this Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red

Chicago 2005 Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled 2006 385,107 100,422 284,685 0 212,417 2007

30,674 16,133 14,541 0 183,888

2,979 1,541 1,438

2008 P2E2 project description

Estimated Reduction/savings

Percent reduction

factory closure

100 100 100

100 100 100

100 100

Dreyfus 2005 Inputs Total Energy Consumption, GJ Electricity consumption Natural Gas consumption Other fuel consumption Total Water Consumption, m3 Municipal Well Outputs Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents Indirect Emissions Direct NG emisions Other direct emissions Total Effluent Discharged, m3 To WWTP To municipal Total Waste Generated, metric tones Waste Disposed Waste Recycled 2006 82,711 50,921 31,790 0 207,188 2007

9,812 8,181 1,631 0 18,885

0 0 0

2008 P2E2 project description

Estimated Reduction/savings

Percent reduction

factory closure

100 100 100

100 100 100

0 0

Cost savings - all values are in USD Electrical Cost Savings $51,425 $44,046 $95,231 $311,019 $148,140 $23,716 $116,812 $66,960 $4,700 $106,884 $886,537 $221,725 $2,900 $1,500 $4,000 Natural Gas Savings Other Energy Savings Water cost Savings $2,709 $1,959 $5,913 Other Totals $54,134 $46,005 $101,144 $311,019 $148,140 $23,716 $684,158 $116,812 $66,960 $0 $13,100 $106,884 $886,537 $0 $285,457

AP

Asquith Guangzhou Panyu Philippines Shanghai Taipei Baddi Bangalore Biesheim Nairobi Poznan Plymouth Tarazona St. Petersburg Santiga Chattanooga Gainesville NFI Silao Toronto Yorkville

total AP

EMEAI

$55,852

$7,880

total EMEAI $155,243 $2,615 $71,375 $35,028 $158,383 $2,499,838 $226,448 $61,350 $2,765 $28,573

Americas

Total Americas Grand Total

$316,538

$0

$81,310

$1,475,749 $381,690 $61,350 $5,381 $99,948 $35,028 $50,000 $208,383 $791,779 $54,000 $2,951,687

2006 Environmental Footprint Summary Metric Guangzhou Panyu MSSU 180,433 45,070 Electricity 98,305 36,324 purchased, GJ Natural Gas 0 0 purchased, GJ Other Fuel 69,839 32,017 purchased, GJ 168,144 68,341 Total Energy, GJ total Energy 0.93 1.52 GJ/MSSU Indirect GHG Emissions, metric 23,346 8,627 Tonnes CO2 equiv Direct Natural Gas GHG emissions, metric tonnes CO2 equiv Direct (other fuel) GHG emissions, metric tonnes CO2 equiv total GHG Emissions, metric tonnes CO2 equiv. Total GHG emissions/MSSU Water Consumption, m3 Water consumption/MSSU Effluent Discharged, m3 Haz waste disposed, metric tonnes Haz waste recyled, metric tonnes Non haz waste disposed, metric tonnes Non haz waste recycled, metric tonnes Total Waste generated (haz + Non haz), metric tonnes Total Waste Recycled, metric tonnes Percent waste recycled Shanghai Taipei 2,605 19,421 28,066 0 13,227 41,293 15.85 3,578 25,420 0 24,878 50,298 2.59 4,452 Antipolo City Asquith 35,220 22,423 22,162 0 6,400 28,562 0.81 2,826 29,257 17,902 0 47,159 2.10 6,863 AP Summary 305,172 239,534 17,902 146,361 403,797 1.32 49,692

0

0

0

0

0

914

914

6,892

2,230

921

1,733

446

0

12,222

30,238 0.17 129,852 0.72 112,035 15 66 1,020 1,413

10,857 0.24 181,100 4.02 63,305 37 4 128 255

4,499 1.73 74,478 28.59 67,030 1 0 402 196

6,185 0.32 67,089 3.45 9,868 0 5 1,095 196

3,272 0.09 14,343 0.41 8,709 6 0 732 264

7,777 0.35 22,814 1.02 16,373 0 37 575 259

62,828 0.21 489,676 1.60 277,320 59 112 3,952 2,583

2,514

424

599

1,296

1,002

871

6,706

1,479 59%

259 61%

196 33%

201 16%

264 26%

296 34%

2,695 40%

Guangzhou other fuel purchase = steam which is an indirect emission but listed under direct other for accounting purposes. Number needs updating pending more data and/or calc Number incorrect, pending info from site

2006 Environmental Footprint summary Cafosa 14,625 41,986 122 56,733 #DIV/0! 1,562 St. Petersburg Nairobi 154,288 15,979 87,302 141,493 0 228,795 1.48 7,915 24,793 0 0 24,793 1.55 1,813 Plymouth 80,931 88,186 92,105 0 180,291 2.23 11,488 Tarazona 17,945 20,233 0 26,286 46,519 2.59 2,136 Biesheim 128,845 119,850 158,385 468 278,703 2.16 2,905 Poznan Bangalore Baddi 176,894 6,703 30,236 163,601 213,221 0 376,822 2.13 30,355 7,025 0 11,142 18,167 2.71 1,846 15,746 0 33,753 49,499 1.64 4,136 EMEAI Summary 611,821 541,361 647,190 71,771 1,260,322 2.06 64,156

228

7,227

0

4,726

0

8,127

10,941

0

0

31,249

8

0

0

0

1,831

3

0

776

2,352

4,970

1,798 #DIV/0! 7,093 #DIV/0! 0 0.4 0 878 258

15,142 0.10 115,969 0.75 57,611 854 441 0 0

1,813 0.11 13,519 0.85 0 0 0 15 0

16,214 0.20 62,876 0.78 18,002 6 2 1,442 636

3,967 0.22 50,581 2.82 0 0.01 0 1,338 114

11,035 0.09 5,134,607 39.85 4,929,222 12 0 2,628 897

41,296 0.23 126,191 0.71 73,909 0 18 522 1,723

2,622 0.39 22,396 3.34 4,616 0 1 15 81

6,488 0.21 71,709 2.37 0 20 0 41 0

100,375 0.16 5,604,941 9.16 5,083,360 892 462 6,879 3,709

1,136

1,295

15

2,086

1,452

3,537

2,263

97

61

11,942

258 23%

441 34%

0 0

638 31%

114 8%

897 25%

1,741 77%

82 85%

0 0%

4,171 35%

sted under direct other for accounting purposes.

2006 Environmental Footprint Summary Dreyfus 50,921 31,790 0 82,711 #DIV/0! 8,181 NFI 5,310 16,763 0 22,073 #DIV/0! 853 Chicago 68,556 100,422 284,685 0 385,107 5.62 16,133 Toronto Chattanooga Gainesville Yorkville 119,312 68,298 171,684 53,756 78,777 41,365 0 120,142 1.01 4,592 75,549 192,944 0 268,493 3.93 12,137 162,692 153,272 0 315,964 1.84 26,137 46,976 28,922 0 75,898 1.41 7,547 Silao 23,461 33,326 32,778 0 66,104 2.82 4,857 80,437 Americas Summary 505,067 553,973 782,519 0 1,336,492 Total Summary 1,422,060 1,334,868 1,447,611 218,132 3,000,611 2.11 194,285

1,631

856

14,541

2,113

9,912

7,829

1,477

1,674

40,033

72,196

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

17,192

9,812 #DIV/0! 207,188 #DIV/0! 18,885 0 0 0 0

1,709 #DIV/0! 3,957 #DIV/0! 2,440 0 36 58 177

30,674 0.45 212,417 3.10 183,888 4 8 1,537 1,430

6,705 0.06 57,925 0.49 43,480 22 0.4 1,950 1,137

22,049 0.32 138,450 2.03 101,841 2 1.57 1,441 687

33,966 0.20 126,792 0.74 26,285 1 0 3,540 2,351

9,024 0.17 25,389 0.47 540 1 0.40 267 309

6,531 0.28 40,292 1.72 10,407 2 0 1,097 437

120,470

283,673 0.20

812,410

6,907,027 4.86

387,766 32 46 9,890 6,528

5,748,446 983 620 20,721 12,820

0

271

2,979

3,109

2,132

5,892

577

1,536

16,496

35,144

0 #DIV/0!

213 79%

1,438 48%

1,137 37%

689 32%

2,351 40%

309 54%

437 28%

6,574 40%

13,440 38%

2007 Environmental Footprint Summary Metric Guangzhou Panyu Shanghai Taipei MSSU Electricity 65,225 35,094 29,706 17,156 purchased, GJ Natural Gas 0 0 0 0 purchased, GJ Other Fuel 46,046 35,070 25,760 28,159 purchased, GJ 111,271 70,164 55,466 45,315 Total Energy, GJ total Energy #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! GJ/MSSU Indirect GHG Emissions, metric 15,490 5,978 7,055 3,005 Tonnes CO2 equiv Direct Natural Gas GHG emissions, metric tonnes CO2 equiv Direct (other fuel) GHG emissions, metric tonnes CO2 equiv total GHG Emissions, metric tonnes CO2 equiv. Total GHG emissions/MSSU Water Consumption, m3 Water consumption/MSSU Effluent Discharged, m3 Haz waste disposed, metric tonnes Haz waste recyled, metric tonnes Non haz waste disposed, metric tonnes Non haz waste recycled, metric tonnes Total Waste generated (haz + Non haz), metric tonnes Total Waste Recycled, metric tonnes Percent waste recycled Antipolo City Asquith 21,011 0 6,819 27,830 #DIV/0! 2,679 22,534 11,530 0 34,064 #DIV/0! 5,286 AP Summary 0 190,726 11,530 141,854 344,110 #DIV/0! 39,493

0

0

0

0

0

589

589

4,543

1,830

1,795

1,962

475

0

10,605

20,033 #DIV/0! 115,366 #DIV/0! 103,829 19.26 128.00 701.74 1,432.58

7,808 #DIV/0! 161,135 #DIV/0! 53,921 25.00 0.36 573.00 396.00

8,850 #DIV/0! 98,972 #DIV/0! 81,872 0.71 0.00 572.08 284.00

4,967 #DIV/0! 30,639 #DIV/0! 3,511 0.00 0.22 635.00 170.00

3,154 #DIV/0! 17,512 #DIV/0! 7,431 0.24 0.00 592.00 258.00

5,875 #DIV/0! 19,055 #DIV/0! 11,036 0.00 25.00 290.00 232.00

50,687 #DIV/0! 442,679 #DIV/0! 261,600 45.21 153.58 3,363.82 2,772.58

2,281.58

994.36

856.79

805.22

850.24

547.00

6,335.19

1,560.58 68%

396.36 40%

284.00 33%

170.22 21%

258.00 30%

257.00 47%

2,926.16 46%

Guangzhou other fuel purchase = steam which is an indirect emission but listed under direct other for accounting purposes. Number needs updating pending more data and/or calc Number incorrect, pending info from site

2007 Environmental Footprint summary Cafosa St. Petersburg Nairobi 94,830 154,812 9,520 0 Plymouth 90,029 80,204 Tarazona 15,208 0 13,607 0 #DIV/0! 249,642 #DIV/0! 8,602 9,520 #DIV/0! 696 170,233 #DIV/0! 11,728 28,815 #DIV/0! 1,625 Biesheim 92,525 106,676 0 199,201 #DIV/0! 2,243 Poznan 114,825 169,292 0 284,117 #DIV/0! 21,305 Bangalore Baddi 7,166 0 12,668 19,834 #DIV/0! 1,882 15,421 0 31,132 46,553 #DIV/0! 4,051 EMEAI Summary 0 439,524 510,984 57,407 1,007,915 #DIV/0! 52,132

7,907

0

4,097

0

5,449

8,648

0

0

26,101

948

883

2,169

4,000

0 #DIV/0!

16,509 #DIV/0! 103,997

696 #DIV/0! 40 #DIV/0!

15,825 #DIV/0! 53,725 #DIV/0! 6,176

2,573 #DIV/0! 38,251 #DIV/0!

7,692 #DIV/0! 4,460,746 #DIV/0! 4,282,056 1.77 0.00 2,975.00 1,561.00

29,953 #DIV/0! 101,159 #DIV/0! 58,161 0.00 13.35 426.28 1,282.00

2,765 #DIV/0! 20,543 #DIV/0! 3,152 0.00 0.96 29.00 40.00

6,220 #DIV/0! 52,857 #DIV/0! 0 16.58 0.00 169.65 0.00

82,233 #DIV/0! 4,831,318 #DIV/0! 4,423,316 686.58 347.31 5,430.17 3,455.00

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0! 73,771 662.00 333.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 6.24 0.00

6.23 0.00 1,824.00 572.00

0.00

995.00

6.24

2,402.23

0.00

4,537.77

1,721.63

69.96

186.23

9,919.06

0.00 #DIV/0!

333.00 33%

0.00 0

572.00 24%

0.00 #DIV/0!

1,561.00 34%

1,295.35 75%

40.96 59%

0.00 0%

3,802.31 38%

sted under direct other for accounting purposes.

2007 Environmental Footprint Summary Dreyfus 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 NFI 4,166 13,727 0 17,893 #DIV/0! 669 Chicago 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 Toronto Chattanooga Gainesville Yorkville 114,295 198,084 72,524 85,128 42,663 0 127,791 1.12 4,963 81,351 114,424 0 195,775 #DIV/0! 13,676 209,198 149,588 0 358,786 1.81 33,608 66,754 50,933 0 117,687 1.62 10,724 Silao 27,190 32,552 31,197 0 63,749 2.34 4,744 68,384 Americas Summary 412,093 479,149 402,532 0 881,681 Total Summary 412,093 1,109,399 925,046 199,261 2,233,706 5.42 160,009

0

701

0

2,179

5,845

7,642

2,605

1,594

20,566

47,256

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

14,605

0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1,370 #DIV/0! 4,804 #DIV/0! 2,340 0.00 41.00 50.03 165.17

0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

7,142 0.06 49,057 0.43 ? 8.07 0.13 413.00 408.00

19,521 #DIV/0! 113,835 #DIV/0! 59,364 1.53 1.04 367.74 1,852.68

41,250 0.21 144,786 0.73 51,294 3.25 0.34 5,065.00 1,151.96

13,329 0.18 28,611 0.39 174 0.00 1.84 477.00 0.00

6,338 0.23 44,159 1.62 15,236 2.50 0.00 699.00 210.70

88,950

221,870 0.54

385,252

5,659,249 13.73

128,408 15.35 44.35 7,071.77 3,788.51

4,813,324 747.14 545.24 15,865.76 10,016.09

0.00

256.20

0.00

829.20

2,222.99

6,220.55

478.84

912.20

10,919.98

27,174.23

0.00 #DIV/0!

206.17 80%

0.00 #DIV/0!

408.13 49%

1,853.72 83%

1,152.30 19%

1.84 0%

210.70 23%

3,832.86 35%

10,561.33 39%

6% Energy reduction achieved through: Compressed air management and leak detection programs fixing leaks, reducing loads on compressors, installing more energy efficient compressors, etc. Chattanooga Panyu Plymouth 30% of our factories will implement compressed air management programs Shanghai Silao Toronto Yorkville Steam Management - insulating valves and fitting, repairing leaks, optimizing boiler efficiencies through replacement or other means installing meters for monitoring, etc. Philippines Baddi Chattanooga 29% of our factories will implement boiler and steam efficiency programs Panyu Shanghai Silao Water Conservation via boiler condensate re-use Philippines Baddi Guangzhou Water conservation via other means Baddi - water recycling, toilet volume reduction 30% of our factories will reduce water consumption Biesheim - method not given Gainesville - effluent reuse, water urinals, cooling water reuse, cooling tower replacement Guangzhou - installation of low flow faucets Panyu - reuse vacuum pump water, installation of meters, reuse of water for irrigation Taipei - institute a water pipe leakage program Waste Reduction Asquith - method not given 25% of our factories will reduce waste Biesheim - increasing recycling rates Poznan - process/equipment modification, employee training and awareness, better housekeeping, better waste segregation Taipei - better re-use of wrapping materials Yorkville - reducing rolling compound usage and better segreation of waste materials to facilitate greater recycling