You are on page 1of 17

RESULT FROM QUESTIONAIRE

Experience Group:

16- above
11-15 year
6-10 year
1-5 year

4
3
2
1
Risk = Likelihood X Impact

Rensponder
Experience Rating
Category ID

Risk Category

R1

R2

R3

R4

R5

R6

R7

R8

R9

Risk
ID

Risk Factor

Shortage of equipment

16

16

16

25

16

25

16

Shortage of material

16

16

16

25

12

25

16

Late deliveries of material

12

12

16

25

16

25

16

Poor quality of workmanship

25

16

25

16

25

16

Lower work quality in presence of time constrain

20

12

16

25

16

25

16

Lack of site safety inspection and poor supervision

20

16

16

16

25

16

20

16

Construction

RESULT FROM QUESTIONAIRE

Experience Group:

16- above
11-15 year
6-10 year
1-5 year

4
3
2
1
Risk = Likelihood X Impact

Rensponder
Experience Rating
1
Category
ID

Construction
Risk
Category

Legal

R3

R4

R5

R6

R7

R8

R9

Risk Factor

Lack of site safety inspection and poor supervision

20

16

16

16

25

16

20

16

Accidents (such as collision,fireand so on)

10

16

16

25

16

16

Damage to persons or property

15

12

16

25

16

16

Changes in the work

16

16

16

16

10

Inadequateplanning

12

16

12

16

16

16

16

11

Insolvencyofsuppliers

16

16

16

16

16

16

16

16

16

16

16

10

15

16

16

16

16

Insolvency ofsubcontractors

13

Bad Weather

14

Change in law and regulation

15

Inconsistencies in government policies

16
17
18

Excessive contract variation


Change in law and regulation
Inconsistencies in governmentpolicies

6
6
6

9
9
9

9
6
6

4
4
4
4

4
4
4
4

6
12
9
9

4
1
1
4

4
9
9
9

4
9
9
9

19

Poor supervision

16

16

12

16

20

20

20

16

16

12

12

16

16

Compliance with Government

12

Delay in payment for claim


Cash flow difficulties
Price inflation of construction materials
financial falure bof the contractor

9
9
9
16

9
9
9
9
9

9
16
9
9
9

8
4
4
12
4

9
16
16
16
12

16
16
16
16
16

12
16
16
16
16

16
16
16
16
9

16
16
16
16
16

Politics and Contracts


Provision
20

21
22
23
24
25
4

R2

Risk
ID

12

R1

Finance

Bureaucratic system and long procedure for approval

RESULT FROM QUESTIONAIRE

Experience Group:

16- above
11-15 year
6-10 year
1-5 year

4
3
2
1
Risk = Likelihood X Impact

R1

R2

R3

R4

R5

R6

R7

R8

R9

Exchange rate fluctuation


Monopolizing of material due closure and other
unexpected policitical condition
Lack of financial resources
Change in taxation/new tax rates
Method of construction defined in drawing and
specification is inappropriate and inapplicable to
construct
Design and drawing change
Defective design (incorrect)
Not coordinated design
Inaccurate quantities
Lack of consistancency between bill of quantities,
drawing and specification

16

12

12

16

16

16

12

16

16
16

9
9

9
4

4
4

16
12

16
16
16

16
16
9

9
9
20

20

16

16

20
20
20
20

9
9
9
9

16
9
9
9

12
8
16
6

9
9
9
9

16
16
16
16
16

9
9
9
9
9

20
20
20
20
20

12
12
12
12
12

20

16

16

20

12

36

Rush design

20

16

37
38

awarding the design to unqualified design


Change of scope

16
16

9
9

9
9

4
8

16
16

16
16
16

9
9
9

20
20
20

12
12
12

Rensponder
Experience Rating
Category ID

Risk Category

Risk
ID

Finance

26
27
28
29

Design

30
31
32
33
34

Design Risk

35

Risk Factor

16
16
12

RESULT FROM QUESTIONAIRE

Experience Group:

16- above
11-15 year
6-10 year
1-5 year

4
3
2
1
Risk = Likelihood X Impact

Rensponder
Experience Rating
Category ID

Risk Category

Environmental

Risk
ID

Logistics

Organisational

R2

R3

R4

R5

R6

R7

R8

R9

9
9

15
9

12
9
8
12

4
4
2
4

25
25
25
25

20
25
25
25

16
16
16
16

20
20
20
20

25
25
25
25

25
25
12

16
16
16

20
20
12

25
25
12

12

12

20
16
16
20
20

20
16
16
20
20

Risk Factor

39
40
41
42

Pollution
Ecological damage
Adverse weather conditions
Difficulty to access the site (very far)

25
16
16
16

43

Environmental factors (floods, earthquakes, etc.)

16

25

16
12

12
16

4
6

25
16

12

16

16

47
48
49
50
51

Compliance with law and regulation


Inaccurate project program
Poor communications between the home and field
offices (contractor side)
Lack of manpower on site
Inaccurate project program
Undefined scope of working
Lack of skilled workers
Inexperienced staffassigned

15
9
9

44
45

20
20
16
20
25

9
9
9
9
9

12
12
9
12
16

6
6
6
9
12

16
16
16
16
9

12
12
12
12
12
12

16
16
16
16
16
16

52

Losing critical staff at crucial point of the project

25

15

53
54
55
56

Insufficient time to plan


Unanticipatedproject managerworkload
Not enough time to plan
Priorities change on existing program

25
25
20
20

9
9
12
12

9
9
9
9

8
12
8

9
9
9
9

12
12
12
12

16
16
16
16

12

16

46
8

R1

20
20
20
6

20
20
20
6

No. of respondent scoring

Risk Level

High

Medium

Low

Highest Nos. of person


in each category

High

High

High

High

High

High

No. of respondent scoring

Risk Level

High

Medium

Low

Highest Nos. of person


in each category

High

High

High

Medium

High

High

High

High

Low

0
0
0
0

4
6
6
6

5
3
3
3

Low
Medium
Medium
Medium

High

2
6
5
5
4

7
2
3
4
4

0
1
1
0
1

Medium
High
High
High
Medium

High

No. of respondent scoring

Risk Level

High

Medium

Low

Highest Nos. of person


in each category

Medium

3
4

1
2

5
4
3
4
3

4
5
6
5
6

4
4
4

5
4
5

0
1
0

4
5
3

Medium
High
Medium
High

0
0
0

High
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Medium

No. of respondent scoring

Risk Level

High

Medium

Low

Highest Nos. of person


in each category

6
6
7
6

2
2
2
2

1
1
0
1

High
High
High
High

7
6
3

1
2
6

1
1
0

4
4
4
4
4

0
0
0
0
0

Medium
High
High
High
High
High

5
4
4
2

4
5
5
5

0
0
0
2

Medium
Medium
Medium

Medium

3
5
5
5
5
5

High
High
High

High

RISK IDENTIFICATION
Classification of Risk Factors and Major Risk Categories
Risk category

Construction

Politics and Contracts


Provision
Finance

Risk code
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
19
20
22
23
24
28
30

Design

31
33
35

Environmental

39
40
41
42
43
44

45
Logistics

47
48
49

Logistics

Organisational

50
51
52

and Major Risk Categories


Risk Factor
Shortage of equipment
Shortage of material
Late deliveries of material
Poor quality of workmanship
Lower work quality in presence of time constrain
Lack of site safety inspection and poor supervision
Accidents (such as collision,fireand so on)
Damage to persons or property
Inadequateplanning
Insolvencyofsuppliers
Insolvency ofsubcontractors
Bad Weather
Poor supervision
Bureaucratic system and long procedure for approval

Delay in payment for claim


Cash flow difficulties
Price inflation of construction materials
Lack of financial resources
Method of construction defined in drawing and specification
is inappropriate and inapplicable to construct
Design and drawing change
Not coordinated design
Lack of consistancency between bill of quantities, drawing
and specification
Pollution
Ecological damage
Adverse weather conditions
Difficulty to access the site (very far)
Environmental factors (floods, earthquakes, etc.)
Compliance with law and regulation
Inaccurate project program
Lack of manpower on site
Inaccurate project program
Undefined scope of working

Lack of skilled workers


Inexperienced staffassigned
Losing critical staff at crucial point of the project

Renspo

Experience R
Category ID

Risk Category Risk ID


1 Construction

1
2
3
4
5

Risk = Lik
Rensponder
Experience Rating

R1

R2

R3

6
6
12
25

6
6
8
8

16
16
12
9

Risk Factor
Shortage of equipment
Shortage of material
Late deliveries of material
Poor quality of workmanship
Lower work quality in presence of time constrain

Risk = Likelihood X Impact


R4

R5

R6

R7

R8

R9

16
16
6
9

16
16
16
16

25
25
25
25

16
12
16
16

25
25
25
25

16
16
16
16

No. of respondent scoring

Risk Level

Risk Response

Avoidance/ Mitigation/
Transfer/ Avcceptance

High

Medium

Low

Highest Nos. of
person in each
category

7
6
5
6

2
3
4
3

0
0
0
0

High
High
High
High

Risk Treatment