Professional Documents
Culture Documents
405. Superelevation
405.1. Forces Acting on a Turning Vehicle
Centrifugal forces on curves are proportional to the local curvature which is
the inverse of the radius of curvature. The centrifugal force acts along the
outward normal and tends to destabilize a vehicle by tipping it about the
outside wheel line. One way to counter this destabilizing eect is to "bank"
the roadway. Superelevation is the banking (rotation) of a highway to counter
some of the lateral force. In Fig. 405.1, the components of the two body
forcesthe gravity force and the centrifugal forceare shown as solid lines.
As shown in the gure, the banking causes a portion of the lateral
acceleration to act normal to the pavement (mV 2/R sin ). This is felt as a
downward force by the vehicle occupants. The remaining portion of the
lateral force may act one of three ways depending on the banking and speed
of the vehicle.
[1]
(405.1)
On the other hand, if superelevation e and side friction coecient f are
known, the dimensionless centrifugal acceleration (normalized with respect
to the gravitational acceleration) is given by
(405.2)
For most practical values, the product (e f ) is negligible and therefore the
centrifugal factor is given by the sum of the superelevation factor e and the
side friction factor f . For stability, the centrifugal factor e + f must be
greater than or equal to the factor v 2/gR.
(405.3)
Given maximum superelevation e max and design side friction factor f , the
minimum safe radius (R
min)
(405.4)
(405.5)
where S = design speed (mph)
e = superelevation (%)
f = recommended side friction factor (decimal)
R = curve radius (ft)
D = degree of curve (degrees)
Example 405.1
The exit ramp from a highway has 4% superelevation. The design speed for
the ramp is 35 mph. If the side friction factor is 0.18, what is the maximum
radius (ft) of the horizontal curve for the ramp?
Solution The minimum radius is calculated from
Figure 405.2. Side friction factors assumed for design. (AASHTO Green
Book.)
f:
Method 1
Method 2
max
Method 5
(405.6)
where L t = length of tangent runo
w = lane width
n = no. of lanes being rotated
b w = a reduction factor = (1+n )/2n
b w = 1.0 for n = 1, b w = 0.75 for n = 2, b w = 0.67 for n = 3
e NC = normal cross slope (%)
= superelevation runo rate (%)
405.5.2. Superelevation Runo Length L r
The length over which outside lane(s) are rotated from level to the fully
superelevated condition is known as the superelevation runo length.
(405.7)
where L r = length of superelevation runo
superelevation exactly at the point of curve (PC) and provide the distance L r
entirely on the tangent. However, this practice is by no means universal.
Many agencies distribute the distance L r to lie partially on the tangent and
partially within the curve. Thereby, the curve is not fully superelevated at the
PC. The distribution of the superelevation runo varies from agency to
agency. For example, if the distance L r is partitioned into 2 : 1 parts, then
two-thirds of L r is located on the tangent (i.e., before the PC of the curve)
and one-third of L r is located within the curve. At the PC the curve has only
two-thirds of the design superelevation. This situation is illustrated in Fig.
405.3. The pavement cross sections are shown to the right. On the tangent,
upto point A , the pavement has a normal crowned section. At B the adverse
cross slope has been rotated to the horizontal prole. The distance AB to
achieve this rotation is the tangent runout L t . From B to C the cross section
is rotated until it is fully superelevated at C . The distance BC is the
superelevation runo (L r ).
AASHTO Green Book . For example, for a design speed of 50 mph, the
maximum is 0.5% (which may also be expressed as 1:200). Commonly
adopted rates are signicantly less than this value and for V = 50 mph, the
SRR adopted may be between 1 : 400 and 1 : 300.
Maximum relative
Equivalent relative
gradient (%)
slope
15
0.78
1:128
20
0.74
1:135
25
0.70
1:143
30
0.66
1:152
35
0.62
1:161
40
0.58
1:172
45
0.54
1:185
50
0.50
1:200
55
0.47
1:213
60
0.45
1:222
65
0.43
1:233
70
0.40
1:250
75
0.38
1:263
80
0.35
1:286
Example 405.2
The alignment of a roadway is composed of the following sections:
Which segment has the lowest factor of safety for lateral stability?
Solution For lateral stability, the superelevation factor e + f must be greater
than V 2/gR . Using speed S (mph), radius R (ft), and g (ft/s 2), this factor
becomes
According to this table, the segment CD has the lowest factor of safety for
lateral stability.
[1]A
, 5th ed.,
Indranil Goswami: Civil Engineering All-In-One PE Exam Guide: Breadth and Depth,
Second Edition. Superelevation, Chapter (McGraw-Hill Professional, 2012),
AccessEngineering