You are on page 1of 23

Interlocking Directorates,

a.k.a. Interlocking Equity(ies) establish parameters of fiduciaries
Thomas Jefferson said in 1821: The germ of destruction of our nation is in the
power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night
and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its
noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render
powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and
oppressive as the government from which we separated.
President Theodore Roosevelt 1906: Behind the ostensible government sits
enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no
responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the
unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task
of the statesmanship of today
President Woodrow Wilson: Some of the biggest men in the U. S., in the field of
commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of
something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so
subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had
better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.
May I remind you that - failure to prevent a deprivation of a constitutionally secured
right (42 U.S.C. 1983, 1985, 1986, 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, etc...) is a criminal Offense?
To simplify issues and bring clarity concerning duties, responsibilities, and
obligations of the offending corporate STATE OF CALIFORNIA officials, we
present the following Interlocking Directorates:
1. The first connection from the highest, and most potent, position is:
a. 77 Stat. 630-631, P.L. 88-243 (1963) and P.L. 88-244 (1963) introduces and
makes law providing the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) as Private Law enacted for
the municipal District of Columbia and the United States (federal government). These
laws/actions were/are expressly in force and effect on citizens of the federal government.
PL 88-243, 77 Stat 630 is AN ACT To enact the Uniform Commercial Code for
the District of Columbia, and for other purposes. This is where the uniform
commercial code enters as the implied law of the land. [see also, H.J. Res 778, December
10, 1963, 77 Stat 775]
It is well settled that United States et al. is a corporation, originally incorporated
February 21, 1871, under the name District of Columbia. 16 Stat. 419 Chapter 62
Heritage Dictionary: Columbia (klum bee-a) n. The United States.
For sake of simplicity, a Public Law, as referenced, P.L. 88-244, is Private Law only

meant for private corporate citizens, not live We the People.

(i) A private law is one which is confined to particular individuals, associations, or
corporations: 50 Am. Jur. 12, p.28
(ii) A private law can be enforced by a court of competent jurisdiction when statutes
for its enforcement are enacted: 20 Am. Jur. 33, pgs. 58, 59.
(iii) Statutes creating corporations are private acts: 20 Am. Jur. 35, p. 60.
(iv) In this connection, the Federal Reserve Act is private law. Federal Reserve
banks derive their existence and corporate power from the Federal Reserve Act:
Armano v. Federal Reserve Bank 468 F. Supp. 674 (1979).
(v) The distinction between public and private acts is not always sharply defined when
published statutes are printed in their final form: Case v. Kelly 133 U.S. 21 (1890).
b. It is all private law, not International law (but, may be referred to as Private
International Law), and it is owned by the same people that own public law 88-243
(1968). The UCC was written and is owned by UNIDROIT. It is in the Vatican
(actually, it is only about one hundred yards from the Holy See).
(i) To properly address public law, one must understand that it is Private Corporate
Charter that owns the P.L. and it is all statutory. Public Law was converted to
Public Policy in 1938 (policy = political = police). All private corporations, including
governments, are under public policy and are to deal only with other corporations,
as exemplified herein.
(ii) The Private Rights of Private Man is not affected by public law, public policy,
private law, or anything else, as long as, Private Man does not harm another Private
Man. He is not statutory, but Lawful.
A. We the people have discharged any debt which may be said to exist
or owed to the state/government. The governments are, presumably,
indebted continually to the people, because the people [the sovereigns]
presumably assented to the A. D. 1878 creation of the government
corporation and because we suffer its continued existence.
continued debt owed to the people is discharged only as it continues not
to violate our private rights, and when government fails in its duty to
provide protection-discharge its debt to the people, it is an
abandonment [delictual fault] of any and all power, authority or vestige
of sovereignty which it may have otherwise possessed, and the laws
remain the same, the sovereignty reverting to the people whence it
came. Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901).
B. All that government does and provides legitimately is in pursuit of
its duty to provide protection for private rights Wynhammer v. People,
(13 NY 378), which duty is a debt owed to its creator, WE THE PEOPLE
and the private un-enfranchised individual; which debt and duty is
never extinguished nor discharged, and is perpetual. No matter what

the de facto government/state provides for us in manner of convenience

and safety, the un-enfranchised individual owes nothing to the
government. (Emphasis mine) Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43.
(iii) Public means: of, concerning, or affecting the common unity of the people, the
Assemblage of Private Man.
(iv) Private means not available for public use, control, or participation, belonging to
a particular person or persons, as opposed to the public or the government (remember,
as a corporation, the government becomes no more than any other corporate
person), not holding an official or public position. - If you're still confused, go back to
1. b. above and 2. & 4.e. below.
(v) The entire taxing and monetary systems are, hereby, placed under the U.C.C. The
Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966, also see: Public Law 89-719, Legis. Hist., pg. 3722, C.R.S.
(vi) NOTE: Concerning private v. public via civil law - The civil law tradition
makes a sharp distinction between private and public law. Private law includes the
rules governing civil and commercial relationships such as marriage, divorce, and
contractual agreements. Public law consists of matters that concern the government:
constitutional law, criminal law, and administrative law. In many countries with civil
law systems, two sets of courts existthose that hear public law cases and those that
address matters of private law. Remember, Civil Law is opposed to Common Law.
(vii) On April 25, A. D. 1938, the United States Supreme Court overturned the
standing precedents of the prior 150 years concerning common law, in the Federal
Vs. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 82 L.Ed. 1188).
(viii) The enumerated, specified and distinct Jurisdictions established by the ordained
Constitution (1789), Article III, Section 2, and under the Bill of Rights (1791),
Amendment VII, were bastardized and fundamentally changed in A. D. 1982 to include
Admiralty Jurisdiction, which was once again brought inland.
This is the FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE necessary to effect unification of CIVIL
and SUITS IN ADMIRALTY. (Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, 1982
Ed., pg. 17; also see, Federalist Papers No. 83; Declaration Of Resolves Of The
First Continental Congress; Oct. 14, 1774, Declaration Of Cause And Necessity Of
Taking Up Arms; July 6, 1775, Declaration of Independence; July 4, 1776, Bennet
vs. Butterworth, 52 U.S. 669.) [SEE 1 (a) above.]
c. The U.S. pays $260,000 per year to UNIDROIT for the use of the

copyrighted UCC. The International Registry is the private law of UNIDROIT.

d. The Vatican Bank had owned Continental Bank, Chicago, whose sole
stockholder was Walter Commings, Jr, the Chief Judge of 7 th Circuit Court of

e. Chicago Board of Trade is owned by a Judge.

f. All courts in the United States (corporate zone) are private, for profit
corporations and listed in Dunn and Bradstreet under the heading, Also Trades As:
(i) There is no debate that the free nation-states of the Union once existed upon North
American soil. There is no debate that the People obtained the Rights of the King as
Sovereigns and Joint Tenants in the Sovereignty. There is no debate that said States of
the Union, if extant, are well hidden and non-accessible and the sovereign People are
now draped with a blackened cloak of deceit, trickery, and true identity theft by those
known as persons of corporate nature, legal fictions, creatures of pretense in mind
(ii) How do they turn a bona-fide de jure republic state of the American union back
into a territory of the federal United States?
(A) On the political side, this is how, on the authority of the United States
Supreme Court, it is the complete subjugation [to bring under control; conquer; to
make subservient; enslave] of any political unit to the federal government of the
United States that makes a subdivision a territory. Binns v. United States, 194 U.S.
486; also The Coquitlam v. United States, 163 U.S. 346. [Boys and girls, can we
all say U.S.D.C.?]
Under the Buck Act, 4 U.S.C Secs. 105-113, the federal government has
created a Federal area within the boundaries of the several states. This area is
similar to any territory that the federal government acquires through purchase,
conquest or treaty, thereby imposing federal territorial law upon the people in
this Federal area, and in Sec. 110(d): The term State includes any
territory or possession of the United States. The Buck act affects the
actions of all federal departments within the 50 states. There in 4 U.S.C.
Sections 105, the federal State is defined (also known as), The State
of xxxxxxx.
The U. S. Supreme Court says, There has been created a fictional federal
State (of) [name of state] within a state. We have numerous
references to this.
Howard v. Sinking Fund of Louisville, 344 U.S. 624, 73 S. Ct. 465,
476, 97 L. Ed. 617 (1953); Schwarts v. O'Hara TP School District, 100
A 2d. 621, 625, 375, Pa. 440
Yes, the United States is a Corporation [See 28 U.S.C. 30020(15)
(A)]. The States are sub-corporations of the aforesaid Federal

Corporation. [See 1934, State Compact Act; Buck Act, 4 U.S.C. 101].
[Primary laws extended to Territories] by the United States was the Customs Act
of July 27, 1868 [15 Stat.L. 240; Rev. Stat. of 1873-1874, 2 nd ed. Secs. 1954-

1976, page 342], extending over the Territory the laws of the United States with
reference to customs, commerce and navigation, and constituting it a customs
collection district. Under this act important powers of regulation were
conferred upon the Secretary of the Treasury.
(B) On the religious side, EXECUTIVE ORDER 13397 made all incorporated
501(c)(3) churches governmental agencies !!
Done with the stroke of a pen, as of March 7, A. D. 2006, the Department of
Homeland Security will now utilize our nations non-profit churches as one of
the federal government's primary spying agencies. Is any further comment
(C) But, how can they have access to our everyday functions to obtain control
over the innocent maneuvers we must negotiate daily?
But, in fact and in law, such statutes are intended to be applied to those who
are here as residents in this State under the Interstate Commerce
Clause of the Federal Constitution and the so-called Fourteenth Amendment.
United States v United Mine Workers of America, (1947) 67 S. Ct. 677,
686, 330 U.S. 258.
-HEAD- Sec. 1621. Definitions
-STATUTE- For the purposes of this subchapter - (a) The term 'person' shall
include an individual, partnership, corporation, or the Government of the
United States.
Clarity must be brought to the subject of State. A vast difference exists
between a fiction, fable, legal entity, corporation of some body politic and the
non-fiction, real and true, body of Christians also known as a state. The
following is placed directly below to bring clarity to such:
The State is a person, and possesses as its property one territory. As this
one civil person consists of all the citizens, so its property consists of
all the individual property of the citizens. It is una persona, unicum
patrimonium. This unity of the person and property of the state is expressed
by the Common Law maxim, that all lands were originally granted out
by the sovereign [Yahweh, God, our Father, through His Son, Yahshua,
the Christ], and are therefore holden, either mediately or
immediately, in fee. In apprehension of [Christian and Biblical] law, the
[Christian] state holds the soil of the whole territory as one estate [in
(D) And, arent they, the federal government, in reality non-existant?

Absolutely, so, let's look at United States Congressional Record, March

17, 1993, Vol. 33. - It is an established fact that the United States Federal
Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933,
48 stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt
and insolvent.
H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress in session June 5, 1933 - Joint
Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold Clause
dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities
of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is
further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in
name only....
(E) How is the United States usurping their alleged authority?
In the Court's Statement of Venue (scilicet, ss) you may find written or
indicated that your Plaintiff is the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Though
this may appear that this may be an attempt to identify The United States of
America, it is fatally flawed and is, in nature, fact, and law, an attempted
enlargement, by means of fictions, of your non-existent granted powers and
In a landmark, time honored, never disputed, and still
distinguished case we learn:
The proper jurisdiction of the courts of Common Law is of things
done within the bodies of counties, and its further enlargements, by
means of fictions, can be considered only as ingenious subterfuges
and devices, to amplify their powers.
Justice Story; 1815 De Lovio vs. Boit, 2 Gall. 398; 7 Fed. Cas. 418; Case No. 1,776
(Reaffirmed 78 U.S. 1 to 396 U.S. 215).
We are bringing to your attention, at this time, the second part of this
indisputable political doctrine. In order to clarify this statement, we have taken
the liberty of noticing synonyms to those words that may not be easily
(Common-Language Clarification) and its further enlargements (expansions),
by means of fictions (imaginary/legal assumptions), can be considered only as
ingenious (clever) subterfuges (concealments) and devices (schemes), to amplify
(exaggerate) their powers.
(iii) Whoever said the police are there to protect and to serve? I said that; theyre
here to protect the political establishment from knowledgeable people and to serve
the public in the same way that a farmer gets his cow serviced to produce another
calf. Are they managing the herd? You bet they are.
23 CFR PART 1250 - 40% TO
40% Benefit to Local-Reg.
Part 1250 gives 40 percent benefit to local police action through political subdivision

participation in State highway safety programs under 23 U.S.C. 402 (b)(1)(C).

1250.4(b) When Federal funds apportioned under 23 U.S.C. 402 are expended by a
political subdivision, such expenditures are clearly part of the local share. [Note:
previous to this it was stated that the Federal funds dispersed are at least 40%.] Well,
so much for un-biased police.
(iv) The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties; it tells the state to let people
alone; it does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even
so elementary a service as maintaining law and order. Bowers v Devito, 686 F2d 616.
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham Al.: 373 US 262 (1962):
If the state does convert your right into a privilege and issue a license and
a fee for it, you can ignore the license and a fee and engage the right with
Wright v. Georgia 373 US 284 (1964):
Failure to obey the command of a police officer constitutes a traditional form of
breach of the peace. Obviously, however, one cannot be punished for failing to
obey the command of an officer if the command itself is violative of the
g. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1
h. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery.
(Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493).
i. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people. (Papal Bulls
of 1455 and 1493).
j. The Popes laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii.,
n. 4. Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44).
k. America is a British Colony. (the UNITED STATES is a CORPORATION, not a land
mass, and it existed before the revolutionary war and the British troops did not leave until
A. D. 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society
for Propagating the Gospel, &c. v. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80,
IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.).
28 USC 3002(15)(A): United States means a Federal corporation.
l. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213). The United States or District of
Columbia is owned by the Vatican Bank, lock stock and barrel, according to Tupper
Sausseys archival research.
m. 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain. (IRS Publication 6209); see also Public Law
88-243 and 88-244 (December 1963). (DC Code, UCC).
n. The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at

Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80). Actually, it was the Rothschild banks the Rothschild banks of England financed the North, - the Rothschild banks of France
financed the South. At that time, the King of England was also the King of France.
o. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph
Gulliani stated on C-Span that New York City was the capital of the World and he was
correct. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2)).
p. The IMF is an Agency of the U.N. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816).
SEE: Agreement Between The United Nations And The United States Of America
Regarding The Headquarters Of the United Nations, Section 7(d) & (8), 22 U.S.C.A 287
(1979 Ed.) at pg. 241). It is to be further observed that the Agreement regarding the
Headquarters District of the United Nations was NOT agreed to (See: Congressional
Record - Senate, December 13, 1967, Mr. Thurmond), and is illegally in the Country in
the first instant.
q. The IRS is an Agency of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) not the United States
Government. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C. D.I.,
Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public
Law 102-391.). See also: Bretton Woods Agreement, as amended.
r. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the
United States government, even though the U.S. Government held shares of stock in
the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang, 254 U.S. 491, Lewis v. United tates, 680 F.2d 1239)
[They are also corporations.]
s. Social Security Numbers are issued by the U.N. through the IMF. The Application for a
Social Security Number is the SS5 form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the
SS5 not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who or what
publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the Treasury
forms. You can get a copy of the SS5 you filled out by sending form SSA-L996 to the SS
Administration. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2)).
t. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF, which is an Agency of the U.N.
(Look at it if you receive one. It should have written on the top left United States
u. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v.
Davis 301 U.S. 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 U.S. 548.).
v. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. House Report (103826)
w. The U.S. has not had a de jure Treasury since A. D. 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654).
x. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113,
22 U.S.C. 285-288)

y. There are no judicial courts in America and there have not been since A. D. 1789.
Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and
Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 U.S. 464, Keller v. PE 261 U.S. 428, 1 Stat. 138-178).
(i) And, do the courts enforce laws, or codes? Answer: Code is supreme. Where
both the code and general principles are available, the former should always be
considered and applied if applicable. By legislative declaration the code is the law, and
if general principles appear inconsistent, they must be considered displaced under AS
45.05.006. Moreover, even where inconsistency does not exist, the code must be
regarded as supreme; general principles even when consistent with the code are merely
supplementary. Prince v. LeVan, 486 P.2d 959, 9 UCC Rep. Serv. 367 (1971). Kelly v.
Miller, 575 P.2d 1221, 23 UCC Rep. Serv. 632 (1978)
(ii) But, are judicial courts necessary? Answer: The particular need for making the
judiciary independent was elaborately pointed out by Alexander Hamilton in the
Federalist, No. 78, from which we excerpt the following:
The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the
community. The Legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules
by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The Judiciary, on
the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either
of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution
whatever. It may truly be said to have neither force nor will, but merely judgment.
(iii) The ideal of checks and balances within government structure have long been a
thing of the past.
The Reconstruction Acts (after the Civil War) took away the Lawful Standing and
Lawful Capacity, from the American Citizens and changed their Lawful Standing to
legal status, from ELECTORS in a THREE BRANCH GOVERNMENT as they were in
Original Jurisdiction, to REGISTERED VOTERS in a two branch government.
Want proof? Go to your local City Clerk and ask for a CERTIFIED COPY of your City
Charter in any State, or your local County Clerk for a CERTIFIED COPY of your County
Charter in any State. You will discover that ALL cities and counties in your State have
only two branches, the Executive and Legislative. There is no Judicial Branch!!
The Judicial Districts were all abolished in A. D. 1856 by the Act of the 34th
The U. S. Supreme Court in A. D. 1860, reviewing the Act of the 34th Congress, ordered
ALL the States in existence at that time to close down all the Courts of law and all
courts complied in 1860. None of the courts of any State are created by the
Constitution of their State.
Every Court, from top to bottom, the justice of the peace courts, the police courts, the
municipal courts, the district courts and the circuit courts are all statutory private
courts (i.e. administrative tribunals) created by codes / statutes which were enacted
by the Legislature and, in fact, and law, merely administrative agencies and only have

the authority conferred by statute.

z. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been
Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178).
(i) Modes of enforcement are erratic and arbitrary, a ground for prosecution is
anybody's guess, and the operation in the law is shrouded in mystery. In most any
issue at hand we might suggest the following:
This ordinance is void for vagueness, both in the sense that it fails to give a
person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his contemplated
conduct is forbidden by the statute, United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S.
612, 617, and because it encourages arbitrary and erratic arrests and
convictions. Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88; Herndon v. Lowry, 301 U.S.
When this court found that the Internal Revenue agents had violated the law
and that the improperly seized records were to be returned, the agents were, to
say the least, not happy. More than once have judges of a court been indirectly
reminded that they too are taxpayers.
No sophisticated person is unaware that even in this commonwealth the Internal
Revenue Service has been in possession of facts with respect to public officials
which it has presented or shelved in order to serve what can only be called
political ends, be they high or low. And a judge who knows the score is aware
that every time his decisions offend the Internal Revenue Service, he is inviting a
close inspection of his returns. Lord v. Kelley, 240 F. Supp. 167 (1965).
(ii) Dear Friends: this all leads to domestic terrorism!
Please follow:
18 U.S.C. Sec. 2331. - Definitions. As used in this chapter (5) the term domestic terrorism means activities that (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the
criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
aa. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502).
bb. We (as corporate entities) own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our
children.(Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten, 154 N.E. 146, Senate
Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481).
cc. We are Human capital. (according to Executive Order 13037).
dd. You (as corporate entities) can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you
are not a party to it. Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of City of
Savannah, 14 Georgia 438, 520) That is why I rely on YOUR sworn Oath to keep

my Rights as secured by the Constitution.

ee. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation
and arrest code breakers. Sapp v. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of
Philadelphia, 477. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247.
However, please be mindful that, it is not until you get to Article 10 (PL 88-243, 77 Stat 630) Construction with other laws that you begin to see that the laws of the Republic were left
in place in Section 28:10-104; Laws not repealed. And, remember, in UCC 1-103.6 it clearly
states that all is to be done in accordance with the Common Law, so, remedy is available,
although hidden. This is how they brought in all of the Uniform Laws through D. C. and
because all of the states are subdivisions with interlocking directorates, all are simply
municipal corporations of D.C., and the D.C. code applies - if you are a corporation.
Ahhh, but, how does the court system see this? Many illustrations could be included, but,
this document does not have room. I will take only the space for one small example:
In A. D. 1976 our American court system (what was left of it) was flushed away.
Senate Bill 94-204 deals with the court system and Senate Bill 94-381 deals with
Public Law. These solidified changes in all operations of law by utilizing the words
construe and construct. Slight deviations transfer meaning of words to fit their
dolus agenda, such as, in changed to at, at law v. in law.
Lawyers, judges, and the court system are now allowed to change any word they
wish to mean any thing they want. The law now means whatever they choose it to
mean. It is no longer a court of law, but a court of construe and construct.
Lawyers are the guilty culprits that make these devious changes. Often their
answers will reflect such changes. They intentionally misquote past cases, or other
issues, as facts by making such changes. Illegal? Not according to the above Senate
So, be aware, they can construe their copyrighted laws any way they wish to fit
the situation for their own betterment; and, you have no say about it. Can you use
the same copyrighted codes, laws, statutes, and regulations against them? Not
unless you have a license from the BAR. You will be in violation of copyright
infringement and punishment is mandatory.
Learn this - there is NO LAW in this nation, or the world, for that matter. There is
only contract law. And, the only Bill of Rights the courts are required to take
cognizance of is the 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th. Fair enough?
Consider the following fact of law, which shall be reiterated further in this
document: Judicial Notice was commanded in the case of Hooven and Allison
Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652, where the Supreme Court ruled that particular case
was the last time it would address official definitions of the term United States,
affirming that there are two (2) distinctly different United States with two (2)
opposite forms of governments, both having the same congress.
[Opposite means opposing!!]

2. All governments, and every agency thereof, are private, for-profit corporations, obtaining
any jurisdictions from their corporate Charters.
a. The contracts between such agencies involve U.S. citizens / persons, which are
legislatively created corporate entities (remember, although all government agents and
employees are 14th Amendment citizens, a constituent Member of the American Body
Sovereign is not);
(i) The Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646 - A 'citizen of the
United States' is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and cobeneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc.
under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc.
in Section 4. and,
b. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L. Ed. 1143, 56 S. Ct. 773, Therefore, the
U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and
franchises of the federal government as an individual entity, and,
c. This State and this County and all Municipalities are controlled by 42
This shows that every agency involved in criminal cases receives Federal funds.
Find the State code and you should find a State Agency that compares to the Coordinating
Council. These are not the only agencies that grant federal funds into the States. This is
only the beginning:
Criminal justice system has ALL OF THE FUNCTIONS OF:
(a) State highway patrol, county sheriff, municipal and township police, and all
other enforcement agencies.
(b) the court of appeals, courts of common pleas, municipal courts, county courts,
and mayors courts when dealing with criminal cases.
(C) prosecuting attorneys, city directors of law, jails and on and on.
Title 42 USC sec. 3791(a) States means any State of the US, DC, commonwealth Puerto
Rico, Units of Local Government means any city, county, township, parish, village or other
general purpose subdivision of a State.
Title 42 sec. 3732 reads
The State Coordinating Council has a Director appointed by the Governor. His duties are
full federal control over the States. Start to understand who you are really up against. Find

the flow of money.

Title 42 sec. 3732 reads:
(a) There is established within the Dept. of Justice, under the general authority of the
A.G., a Bureau of Justice Statistics (Bureau)
(b) The Bureau shall be headed by a Director appointed by the President, and with the
advice and consent of the Senate - - - The Director shall have final authority for all
grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts awarded by the Bureau. The Director
shall report to the AG, through the Asst. A.G.
(1) The name, and address of the Director per Title 42 @ 3732
(2) Certified copy of Oath
(3) Certified copy of bond or insurance that covers his actions
(4) Copy of contracts awarded that award money to the State
(5) The reports the AG made that reflect that money
Once you establish that the courts, prosecutors, public defenders, auto registration, are all
claiming federal money for their operations then they commit fraud in the procedures they
use, it is actionable under FALSE CLAIMS ACT.
For some interesting reading get a copy of Title 4 U.S.C. and take careful notice of the
section States.
Also, Term state as used in rules providing when a state may appeal in a criminal case is
all inclusive and intended to include not only the state but its political subdivisions,
counties and cities. Spokane County v. Gifford, 9 Wash. App. 541, 513 P.2d 301, 302.
Federal Government is a state bound by all of provisions of the Interstate Agreement on
Detainers. Enright v. U. S., D.C.N.Y., 437 F. Supp., 580 581.
Foreign State. A foreign country or nation. The several United States are considered
foreign to each other except as regards their relations as common members of the Union.
3. An Issue declared, but not rebutted, stands as Truth in Law (thus, this proper rebuttal):
a. All U.S. citizens were classified as Enemies of the State as made more explicit in our
EXHIBIT 063 - NOTICE THAT AFFIANT IS NOT a nom de guerre, in which we
demonstrated that, pursuant to Public Law 94-412, 90 Stat. 1255 (1976), the state of
national emergency has been officially terminated by the United States Congress,
and accordingly, any and all authorities which might have permitted Civil Courts of
Summary Jurisdiction (Star Chambers) to exist in American federal courts were also
effectively terminated by said Public Law [See: 42 U.S.C. 1986], and explicitly brought
forward in EXHIBIT 063 - NOTICE THAT AFFIANT IS NOT A nom de guerre, with an
additional eight (8) points. For brevity, only one point will be displayed:
Point 063 A. Affiant has seen no record or evidence to indicate that Affiant is a
combatant enemy of the State, or that Affiant is a belligerent of the government, as per;
article by Chuck Morse, Is the National Emergency of FDR Still In
Place? that: This was a classic example of sleight of hand. In fact,
Congress exempted all laws, based on the emergency of 1933 that were
already in place. Rather than being based on the authority of the

President under a national emergency these federal laws have now been
codified as a permanent part of the U.S. Federal Code. Included among
the codified laws would be Section 5(b) of the Trading with the Enemy
Act, which classifies the American citizen as an enemy of the
government. Therefore, although the national emergency technically
ended on September 14, 1976, when the 93rd Congress passed H.R. 3884,
the National Emergencies Termination Act (50 USC 1601, Public Law 94412), because the last paragraph said that it didnt apply to any authorities
under the act of October 6, 1917, as amended, the classification of a United
States citizen still stands as enemy of the government, Affiant has seen no
record or evidence that Affiant should maintain any association with the label,
definition, or designation of a US citizen, or any similar appellation.
b. Under Act of Congress, May 31, 1878, c. 146, 20 Stat. 87, 31 U.S.C.A. 404, which
enacts that notes of the United States, issued during the war of the Rebellion, under acts of
congress declared them to be legal tender in payment of private debts, and since the close
of the war redeemed and paid in gold coin at the treasury, shall be reissued and kept in
circulation, is constitutional, and notes so reissued are a legal tender.
This idea supports that, under emergency - the War of Rebellion (Civil War), the printing
of Notes is Constitutional. Of course in the actual theater of war, the Constitution is
suspended, and some of the Executive Orders of the War Between the States are still in full
force and effect.
So, bear in mind that:
(1) the Emergency War Powers Act is in full force and effect; and,
(2) though notes are not Lawful Money, they are declared legal tender; and,
(3) all U.S. citizens are declared as enemies of the government; and,
(4) all legal tender (notes of the Federal Reserve) is defined as US currency.
4. Black's Law Dictionary Fifth Edition, page 1420, A mixed war is one which is
made on one side by public authority, and the other by mere private persons.
a. We have determined that a mixed war is a Commercial War; and, a public
authority exercises Private Law; to the benefit of corporate strategy, which is not
unlawful if not exercised against a Private Person, or Private Man.
b. When Congress is operating in its exclusive jurisdiction over the District of
Columbia, the Territories, and enclaves, it is important to remember that it has full
authority to enact legislation as private acts pertaining to its boundaries, and it is not a
state of the union of American states because it exists solely by virtue of the charter compact - constitution that created it. The Constitution does not say that the District of
Columbia must guarantee a Republican form of Government to its own subject citizens
within its territories. (See Hepburn & Dundas v. Ellzey, 6 U.S. 445 (1805); Glaeser v.
Acacia Mut. Life Ass'n., 55 F. Supp. 925 (1944); Long v. District of Columbia, 820 F.2d
409 (D.C. Cir. 1987); Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Kaplus, 368 F.2d 431 (1966),
among others).
In Noah Webster's dictionaries, pre 1969, in the abbreviation section you will find U.S.C.
defined as United States of Colombia. And, then in the American Heritage Dictionary, the

definition of Columbia you will find: Columbia, the United States. This notation is to
de-fuse any assumption/presumption that this Affiant is subject to, or a citizen of
any such extension/trespass against the mind, will, and conscience of Affiant, within, or
without, the United States, onshore, or offshore.
c. Why were the post offices in Washington, D. C. placed under the authority
of the Secretary of the Treasury???
72d Congress Sess. II CHS. 160-162
MARCH 1, A. D. 1933
March 1, 1933 [H.R. 14401.]
[Public, No. 405.]
Washington City post office.
Jurisdiction, etc. of, placed under the Secretary of the Treasury.
Vol. 30 P. 614.
U.S.C., p. 1306
To provide for placing the jurisdiction, custody, and control of the Washington City post
office in the Secretary of the Treasury. [and, every post office with ZIP codes]
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America
in Congress assembled, That the Act of July 1, 1898 (U.S.C., title 40, sec. 285), is hereby
amended to give to the Secretary of the Treasury exclusive jurisdiction, control, and
custody of the Washington City post office and the additions thereto, located at North
Capitol Street and Massachusetts Avenue, to be operated by him the same as other public
buildings under his custody and control.
Approved, March 1, 1933.
d. The U.S. Attorney General is the permanent member to the Secretariat of the
Interpol Operation, and the Secretary of Treasury the alternate permanent member.
Under Article 30 of the Constitution and General Regulation of Interpol, 22 USC 263(a),
the agents are required to renounce their allegiance to their respective countries and
expatriate. Consequently, ALL public servants, officials, Congressmen politicians,
judges, attorneys, law enforcement personnel, the States and their various agencies, are
express agents of the Foreign Principals who have bankrupted and stolen the United
States (of America) through the paper money banking swindle and other frauds and
treacheries. And, why is the Secretary of the Treasury also known as the US Governor
for the International Monetary Fund?
e. And, how are all the States linked to the Federal government?
(i) All states in the Union were reformed as franchisees or political subdivisions of the

corporation known as the UNITED STATES, hence creating a new (and,

different/alternate) union of American STATES. UNITED STATES CODE, Title 28,
3002(15)(A), basically reiterates that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. What
was not said in 1871, but was implicit, was what is plainly stated at Title 28, 3002(15)
(B) & (C): That all departments of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION are
part of the corporation. The Corporation and its subsidiaries have suffered at
least three bankruptcies.
Much later (Conference of Governors, 1945) the legal fictions called State of YOUR
STATE confirmed and pledged what was not theirs to pledge, the sweat, labor,
engineering, technology, and future children of the American Body Sovereign (i.e. We
the People), to support the indebted legal fiction, UNITED STATES. The full
Changing of the Guard (state name change status) was accomplished in, I think, A. D.
(ii) The other united states of America is the continental American union of de jure
republic states. This is the country founded by the Articles of Confederation (actually,
Canada was part of the original charter), Bill of Rights, the Declaration of
Independence and the Constitution for the United States of America. The original,
organic Constitution had no title, the Preamble was the title. When the constitution
was used as the corporate charter for the Act of February 21, A. D. 1781, it was given a
title, - Constitution of the United States of America, and that IN ALL CAPITAL
LETTERS, as in the NAME of a vessel. Please note the distinct difference and meaning
in the two words of and for. Of means something belongs to something, or
someone, else - Constitution of (belonging to, possession) the United States of
America, v. Constitution for (the seating of a Tribunal, seating of judgment)
the United States of America.
So, what difference does it make if they changed one tiny little word? You'd better
learn. If you don't want to learn, go back to sleep - I apologize whenever I disturb any of
the pajama people.
f. And, how did the International Bankers become the receivers in bankruptcy, but first,
remember, the only ones put at risk are the ones that turned in their gold to
the Securities Intermediaries! (So, how can they rightly claim the position of
receivers of the bankruptcy??)
(i) Please observe the sleight of hand as the International Bankers slip in
to assume the position of Creditor, without contributing any money,
whatsoever; pay special attention to the fact that there is a statutory
pledge and they assumed position as receiver:
Title 31 U.S.C. 3123 makes a statutory pledge of the United States government to
payment of obligations and interest on the public debt.
It says, the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay interest due or accrued on the
public debt and further delineates a portion of the total public debt which is held by
the public, [you and me], as the net public debt.
Title 18 Sec. 8 defines ''obligation of the United States'' to include all

certificates of indebtedness ..drawn upon authorized officers of the

United States issued under any Act of Congress, which of course includes the
Secretary of the Treasury, And of course includes public law 73-10, HJR-192 which
provides for its issuance as Public Policy in remedy for discharge of equity interest
recovery on that portion of the public debt to its Principals, and Sureties bearing the
Obligations of the UNITED STATES.
(ii) We must get more specific to unravel the threads of this web of deceit. In the 14th
Amendment (which all public goverment employees are party to) it plainly states:
The validity of the public debt... ...shall not be questioned, and further states,
the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay interest due or accrued on the public debt
and further delineates a portion of the total public debt which is held by the public,
[non-14th Amendment citizens], as the NET public debt.
So, public debt is the charges against me by the several and many
corporations that service me (government and non-government, but all
corporate), and the net public debt is the interest due or accrued, which
is to be returned to the source, (me) as Equity for my losses incurred by
supporting the Beast (turning in the Lawful Money Gold) [Reference to corporate
14th Amendment, Section 4].
I must reiterate that it is the 14th Amendment citizen and the Treasury Department
that is not to question The validity of the public debt... (...shall not be
(iii) The question of Communal Debt arises and must be answered to clarify the
issues. The Communal Debt was, and is, the debt of the Corporation(s), in particular,
governments and the expense of running the same. Since the de jure governments are
in position, but no offices are filled, there can be no expenses for the same. The de
facto institutions of government have no negative expenses, as they hire only
qualified pirates and thieves.
(iv) The next question that must be addressed is that of Communal Credit.
Understand this, there was, and is, no Communal Credit. It was the Private Man
under duress, coercion, threat of imprisonment, loss of life, etc., that delivered his gold
to the thieves, it was not the corporate entities that turned in the gold.
(v) I am convinced that there is a one million dollar ($1,000,000) limitation on each
occurrence that I may make request for discharge against the net public debt:
Title 26 U.S.C. Section 163(h)(3)(B)(ii), $1,000,000 limitation: The aggregate
amount treated as acquisition indebtedness for any period shall not exceed
$1,000,000 ($500,000 in the case of a married individual filing a separate return).
(vi) I must address the issue of what, or how much, in the form of money was created
to bring about this majestic public debt. First, let me state that money is the ONLY
creation of mankind. Next, please be informed that only the debt money is created,
never the interest.

And, you can not pay a debt instrument with a debt instrument (a bill with a Federal
Reserve Note), you can only discharge the debt - set it off into the future, so the debt
accrues and climbs to a higher level with each use.
Now, in reference to (ii) above stating that the Secretary of the Treasury shall
pay interest due or accrued on the public debt and further delineates a portion of the
total public debt which is held by the public, [non-14th Amendment citizens], as
the NET public debt, when you and I direct the Secretary of the Treasury to
discharge, or setoff, our (non 14th Amendment citizen) debts, it is the accrued
interest returning to its' source, and reducing the public debt in the process.
5. We have studied, in depth, the Trading With The Enemies Act (TWEA), Title 50
APPENDIX App., and found the most recent edit of Title 50a of the U.S. Code was released by
the Law Revision Counsel - LRC - ( of the U.S. House of
Representative on 2007-02-13 ...and most recently processed by the Legal Information
Institute on Fri Feb 16 04:33:56 2007. Therefore, our information seems to be most current.
a. We have determined that Sections 7, 9, and 16 of TWEA in Title 50 APPENDIX App.
provides us with remedy and recourse; and, under said document, we confirm:
(i) We have administered our Claims under Oath; and,
(ii) All Claims are ONLY against Corporations; and,
(iii) All said Corporations are subject to the Secretary of State, California State, The
United States of America.
b. In the Nature of Declaration, we solemnly state:
(i) We are NOT Austrian or Hungarian nationals. We are NOT of Germany, Austria,
Hungary, or Austria-Hungary ancestry.
(ii) We ARE California Nationals, native-born Californians, of Scottish, Irish, British,
and an indeterminate percentage of American Cherokee and other American Indians
lineage. All of our parents were of similar percentage of European and Indian stock. We
exercise Right of Claim as Remaindermen and heir to all assets belonging to our
natural parents.
(iii) Our declaration of political Status / Standing as an American National
(pursuant to Trading With Enemy Act, TWEA) is upon the land as live Californians
(not within any corporate entity).
(iv) Our proper political Status / Standing is established in International Law,
the Law of Nations and the treaty of nations, which guarantees every man the right to
make political self determination, which may vary from time to time. We are a
constituent Member of the American Body Sovereign and properly seated in Office of
We the People.
c. TWEA states that; after one has proper standing, and has established a relationship with

the Comptroller, they have a duty to protect me. They are bonded to do so and they have
taken an oath to do so. You have been properly given Notice of:
(i) My declaration of political Status / Standing was made known for this last
time in Section 5 b (iii) above.
(ii) Notice has been served on the original registrars, being, they are the original
fiduciary, that they, as per; UCC 1 and UCC 3 filings mentioned previously to effectively
function to alleviate the distresses and eliminate the Breach of the Peace, which is the
Highest Crime under International Law.
6. According to John Bouvier's Law Dictionary, Revised 6th Ed (A. D. 1856):
a. CONUSANCE, CLAIM OF, English law. This is defined:
(i) to be an intervention by a third person, demanding judicature in the cause against
the plaintiff, who has chosen to commence his action out of claimant's court. 2 Wilson's
R. 409.
(ii) It is a question of jurisdiction between the two courts Fortesc. R. 157; 5 Vin. Abr.
588; and not between the plaintiff and defendant, as in the case of plea to the
jurisdiction, and therefore it must be demanded by the party entitled to conusance, or
by his representative, and not by the defendant or his attorney. Id. ibid. A plea to the
jurisdiction must be pleaded in person, but a claim of conusance may be made
by attorney. 1 Chit. Pl. 403.
(iii) There are three sorts of conusance. 1. Tentere placita, which does not oust
another court of its jurisdiction, but only creates a concurrent one. 2. Cognitio
placitorum, when the plea is commenced in one court, of which conusance belongs to
another. 3. A conusance of exclusive jurisdiction; as that no other court shall hold
pica, &c. Hard. 509 Bac. Ab. Courts.
b. Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 1531 says, In essence, all court
decisions are based on commercial law or business law and has criminal
penalties associated with it.
c. In Erie Rail Road v- Thompkins (1938), the U. S. Supreme Court Ruled: The
United States is a bankrupt Nation in Receivership to this Nations
Creditors; And, All Law is Commerce!
Please see EXHIBIT - Commercial
19 C.J.S. Sections 883, 884 of Chapter XVIII, Foreign Corporations follows
in its entirety:
19 C.J.S. Section 883, page 541, XVIII. FOREIGN CORPORATIONS
Definition and General Considerations
A foreign corporation is one that derives it existence solely from the laws of another
state, government, or country, and the term is used indiscriminately, sometimes in
statutes, to designate either a corporation created by or under the laws of another
state or a corporation created by or under the laws of a foreign country.
At common law, a corporation may be deemed a person, and statutes providing that
corporations shall be deemed persons include foreign corporations.

Generally, the status of a foreign corporation as either foreign or domestic is

determined solely by the place of its origin, without reference to the residence of its
stockholders, or incorporators, or the place where the business is transacted.
However, by express enactment, a corporation, a majority of whose stock is held by
aliens, is, for some purposes, deemed to be a foreign corporation. A domestic
corporation does not become a foreign corporation merely by accepting from
another state a grant of the right to own property and to transact business in such
other state.
Federal Corporations
A federal corporation operating within a state is considered a domestic corporation
rather than a foreign corporation. The United States government is a foreign
corporation with respect to a state.
Section 884. Status
A corporation exists only in contemplation of law, and by force of law, and where
that law ceases to operate, the corporation can have no existence. A state cannot
impose one of its artificial creatures on another sovereignty nor confer
on its corporators powers which they can lawfully exercise beyond its
jurisdiction. Rather, it must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot
migrate to another sovereignty.
d. And, of course the Fed makes grants to the States - It all starts here:
(i) TITLE 49 Sec. 31102. - Grants to States (and, the borrower is slave to the
(ii) Commercial Vehicle Programs - All law is commerce, with
commercial penalties.
(iii) Your DRIVER LICENSE is a commercial permit (and, it is only good for
commercial vehicles).
7. BE INFORMED, because of interlocking directorates of many agencies, offices,
and governmental employees working in concert and collusion, the resultant
effect, due to the usurpation of authority, excess of jurisdiction, or lack of all
jurisdiction, not granted by the Lawful Man, is the experiencing of major pains
and penalties and other crippling injuries, as per:
a. While, on its face, executive measures with the red and blue lights may seem to be a
way to deter crime, implementing statutes actually gives incentives to judges, police
officers and district attorneys to rope as many people into the court process as possible.
Like any other commission structure, it is a numbers game. The higher the number of
defendants created, the higher the payout for the police officer, the judge, and the District
Attorney [see: 1997 Court Funding Act].
b. Justice Bandeis eloquently affirmed his condemnation of abuses practiced by
government officials, who were defendants, acting as government officials. In the
case of Olmstead vs. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 48 S. Ct. 564, 575; 72 L. Ed. 944

(1928) he declared:
Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be
subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the Citizen. In
a Government of laws, existence of the Government will be imperiled if it fails to
observe the law scrupulously. Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher.
For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious.
If the Government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it
invites every man to become a law unto himself. It invites anarchy. To declare that, in
the administration of the law, the end justifies the means would bring a terrible
retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine, this Court should resolutely set its face.
c. McCurdy v. Montgomery County, Ohio, 240 F.3d 512 (6th Cir. 2001) government
officials in general, and police officers in particular, may not exercise their authority
for personal motives, particularly in response to real or perceived slights to their dignity.
Surely, anyone who takes an oath of office knows - or should know - that much.
d. Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all in a sworn
officer of the law. In re McCowan (1917), 177 Cal. 93, 170 P. 1100.
e. 18 U.S.C. Sec. 31(6) Motor vehicle. The term motor vehicle means every description
of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for
commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers,
passengers and property, or property or cargo.
f. 18 U.S.C. Sec. 31(10) Used for commercial purposes.--- The term used for commercial
purposes means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge,
or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other
undertaking intended for profit.
An action by Department of Motor Vehicles, whether directly or through a court
sitting administratively as the hearing officer, must be clearly defined in the statute
before it has subject matter jurisdiction, without such jurisdiction of the licensee, all
acts of the agency, by its employees, agents, hearing officers, are null and void. Doolan
v. Carr, 125 U.S. 618; City v Pearson, 181 Cal.40.
As the majority states, failure to verify the signature of the arresting officer on the
Uniform Violations Complaint precluded the district court from being vested with
subject matter jurisdiction and from being empowered to act. Therefore, all
proceedings in the trial court are rendered void. Buis v. State, 792 P.2d 427 (Okl. Cr.
g. The Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case
to be a witness against himself. The Amendment not only protects the individual against
being involuntarily called as a witness against himself in a criminal prosecution but also
privileges him not to answer official questions put to him in any other proceeding civil or
criminal formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future
criminal proceedings. Lefkowitz v. Turley, 94 S. Ct. 316, 414 U.S. 70 (19 73).

h. The Fourth Amendment forbids stopping a vehicle even for limited purposes of
questioning its occupants unless the police officer has a founded suspicion of criminal
conduct. U.S. V. Ramirez & Sandoval, 872 F. 2d. 1392.
i. Harassment by threat of fraudulent proceedings prohibited: Source: Statute at
Large 1997, ch 45, 10; Statute at Large 2005, ch 120, 228.
(Text of section effective July 1, 2006) Harassment by threat of fraudulent legal
proceedings or liens prohibited--Misdemeanor--Subsequent violation felony. Any
person who harasses any other person by sending or delivering, or causing to be sent or
delivered, any letter, paper, document, notice of intent to bring suit, or other notice or
demand that simulates any form of court or legal process and that threatens the other
person, directly or indirectly, with incarceration, monetary fines, or penalties, or with
the imposition of a counterfeit lien on the real or personal property of the other person
is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. A second or subsequent conviction for a violation of
this section is a Class 6 felony. Lack of belief in the jurisdiction or authority of the state
or of the United States is no defense to a prosecution under this section.
A distinction must be here observed between excess of jurisdiction and the clear
absence of all jurisdiction over the subject-matter any authority exercised is a
usurped authority and for the exercise of such authority, when the want of
jurisdiction is known to the judge, no excuse is permissible. Bradley v. Fisher,
13 Wall. 335, 351, 352.
j. After all the above issues are brought into the light of Truth, there is but one
judgment-call for those at ground, grass-roots, level and that is to stop the
pirates at cruiser level. Educate them as best you can. Yes, you can starve the
corporate beast. Convert them one by one. (Just bear in mind that a snake is a snake.
When in doubt, ask yourself how many of your family that you love have been destroyed
by an extra close shave - the sheering of the Sheeple. How many of your paychecks have
gone to the Beast and how many of your homes have gone to the international bankers
thru fraud and deceit?)
If you do not comprehend that every patrol vehicle is, in fact, a pirate cruiser, then, go
back and read the above until you do. Im not saying that all pirates are bad. Most pirates
are nothing more than privateers contracted to the Crown. Most are just not informed.
Many actually believe they are doing a service for the community. Just remember, if you
have a cow and you want a calf, you call a farmer with a bull to service your cow. Point
Because of interlocking directorates and networking computerized files, you are
charged with the responsibilities, duties, and directives to:
a. Assure that all related agents/agencies receive verification of this
documentation, including, but not limited to:
(i) Comptroller of the Bankruptcy, because of the effect on the banking system
(ii) Secretary of State, United States
(iii) Commissioner of I.R.S., because of the effect on his records

(iv) U.S. Attorney General

(v) Associate U.S. Attorney General
(vi) Chief Counsel of the Office of Foreign Asset Control pursuant to 40 Stat 411
b. Accomplish the task of:
(i) Removal of our Christian Titles [Names], listed above, from Enemy of the State
(ii) Placing our Diplomatic Standing in National Crime Information
System presented explicitly in the National Crime Information Center.
Bottom Line:
A constituent Member of the American Body Sovereign cannot be punished by any
government corporation, or agency thereof, for sincerely held religious convictions.
Biblical Law at Common Law supersedes all laws, and Christianity is
custom, custom is Law. And, All acts of legislature...contrary to natural right
and justice are void. Robin, et al. v. Hardaway, 1 Jefferson 109 (1772).
Holy Bible, Book of Habakuk, Chapter 2 NASV: Then the Lord answered me and said,
Record the vision, and inscribe it on tablets, that the one who reads it may run. For it is yet
for the appointed time; it hastens toward the goal, and it will not fail. Though it tarries, wait
for it; for it will certainly come, it will not delay
Behold the proud one, his soul is not right within him
Will not all of these take up a taunt-song against him, even mockery and insinuations against
him, and say, 'Woe to him who increases what is not his -- for how long -- and makes himself
rich with loans? Will not your creditors rise up suddenly, and those who collect from you
awaken? Indeed, you will become plunder for them. Because you have looted many nations,
all the remainder [remnant] of the peoples will loot you -- because of human bloodshed and
violence done to the land, to the town and all its inhabitants.