Listening Scoring Guides F 06

Listening Scoring Guides
ECED 4300 Students

Fall Semester 2006
Valdosta State University
Valdosta, GA
Tonja L. Root, Ed.D.

Editor
Root, T. L. (2007, Spring). Listening scoring guides. Retrieved May 10, 2007, from Valdosta State
University, Department of Early Childhood and Special Education, Dr. Tonja Roots Web
site: http://coefaculty.valdosta.edu/troot/eced4300/comprehensive_listening_strategies.htm
Scoring Guide: Note-taking

Name:____________________________________________________________
Completion
Graphic Organizer is complete
Graphic Organizer isnt complete
Relevance
Dates are filled in with relevant

information.
Dates arent filled in with relevant

information.
0 points will be rewarded for performance below 1 pt. indicator.

.5 addition and subtractions may be made for partial efforts between indicators.
TOTAL POINTS (OUT OF 4)__________
Met PLO- 3.5 to 4
Partially Met PLO- 2.5 to 3
Did Not Meet PLO- 1 to 2
Botting, J. (2006). Scoring Guide: Note-taking. Unpublished Manuscript. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.
Conflicts on the Plains: Notes

Acceptable
Partially
Acceptable
Not Acceptable
Notes Filled Out with

partially
accurate/detailed
information
Filled out each section Filled out each section Did not fill out any
with three or four
with one or two
notes
(Did not Meet)
bullets completed
bullets completed
Notes Filled Out with

Accurate/ Detailed
Information
Filled out each section Did not fill out any

with two or three
notes
(Did not Meet)
bullets completed
(Met)
Filled out each section
with all bullets completed
(Met)
(Partially Met)
(Partially Met)
Level Of PLO
Minimal Level of PLO: Partially Acceptable
Staten, A. (2006). Conflicts on the Plains. Unpublished notes, Valdosta State University, GA.
Rubric for Note-taking Assessment Activity (by Emily McGill)

Grade level _______ Name of student____________________________
3
2
1
Note-taking *Wrote information Wrote information
Wrote information for
for at least:
for at least:
at least:
three differences
two differences
one difference
Accuracy of Wrote information
Information that is accurate
Written on
Graphic
Organizer
Form
Wrote in short
phrases
No
attempt
*Wrote information
that is partially
accurate
Wrote information that

is not accurate
No
attempt
*Wrote in a mixture
of short phrases and
complete sentences
Wrote in complete
sentences
No
attempt
Total points
3 x _______ =
______ points
2 x _______ =
______ points
0 x ____
1 x _______ = ______ =
points
______
pts.
Total points for Note-taking Activity = ____________

* = Meets Primary Learning Outcome (PLO)
Efferent Listening Scoring Guide

Alecia Strohl
Correctly completes
outline while listening
to information given
orally.
PLO Met
Correctly answers
56+ of 64 (85%+)
blanks on the
outline provided.
PLO Partially Met

Correctly answers
45-55 of 64 (70%84%) blanks on the
outline provided.
PLO not met

Correctly answers
less then 45 of 64
(<70%) blanks on
the outline provided.
Total score: _____/64

*1/2 points are awarded for blanks with the first letter of the missing word.
* 1 Point is awarded for putting name and student # on paper (included in the total of 64 points.
Efferent Listening Rubric

Main Idea and Supporting Details of the English Colonies
by Kim Hays
Exceeds PLO
Main Idea
Supporting
Details
Meets PLO
Partially
Meets PLO
Does Not Meet

PLO
Student
correctly fills
and describes
the main idea
of the section.
Student
correctly gives
the main idea
of the section.
Student
somewhat
gives the main
idea.
Student does
not give the
main idea.
Student
correctly gives
five supporting
details that are
relevant to the
main idea.
Student
correctly gives
four or three
supporting
details that
relate to the
main idea.
Student
correctly gives
three or two
supportive
details that
relate to the
main idea.
Student gives
one or no
supportive
details that
relate to the
main idea.
Rubric for Efferent Listening Lesson Plan

Main Idea and Details-Christopher Columbus
by Hayley Snipes
Exceeds PLO
Main Idea
Students
correctly
describe, in
detail, the main
idea that
describes the
passage read to
them.
Supporting Students
details
correctly
identify 7 or
more supporting
details of the
correct main
idea.
Meets PLO
Partially meets
PLO
Students correctly Students
describe the main somewhat
idea of the
describe the
passage read to
main idea of the
them. (Main
passage read to
Ideas may vary, as them.
long as they are
on target.)
Students correctly Students
identify six
correctly
supporting details identify 3-5
of the correct
supporting
main idea.
details of the
correct main
idea.
Does not meet PLO

Students do not
correctly identify the
main idea of the
passage read to them.
(Students will not
receive any credit for
this.)
Students correctly
identify 0-2 supporting
details of the correct
main idea. (Students
will not receive any
credit for this.)
Scoring Guide for Listening Lesson

by Beth B. Sellars
PLO: The students will take notes while listening to Clean and Clear by Teresa Domnauer.
Exceeds PLO
Meets PLO
Did Not Meet PLO
No
Attempt
Student
Student
Student
No attempt
provides more
provides five
provides less than
was made
than five details
details for
five details for
Details
for each section
each section
each section
Student
Student may Student does not No attempt
abbreviates, uses
abbreviate,
abbreviate, and
was made
Format of notes
phrases and/or
uses phrases
does not use
clauses
and/or clauses
phrases or clauses
M = Students met the PLO; P = Students partially met the PLO; D = Students did not meet the PLO
To meet the PLO, the student must provide five details for each section AND the student must use
abbreviations, phrases and/or clauses.
To partially meet the PLO, students must provide five details for each section OR the students must
use abbreviations, phrases and/or clauses.
Name _____________________________________________________________________
Listening Rubric (Bundrick)

Criteria
Content
3
All notes taken are
correct.
2
Some notes were off
topic
0
Notes were off topic
Or
Did not write any notes
Wrote 3 or more notes
Wrote less than 3 notes
(M)
Abbreviated the notes
correctly
(PM)
Abbreviated some
things, but were
incorrect.
Not abbreviated, or
were all incorrect.
(M)
(PM)
(N)
(N)
Organization
M=Meets PLO
PM=Partially met
N=Did not meet PLO
Scoring guide for ELA Listening Lesson - Natasha Wilson Fall 2006
Filled out Notes
Filled out Notes with
accurate information
Acceptable
Partially Acceptable
Not Acceptable
Filled out fourth note

box with three or four
notes (Met)
notes (Met)
Filled out notes with

one or two notes
(Partially met)
one or two notes
(Partially met)
Did not fill out any

notes (Did not meet)
Level of PLO
Minimal Level of meeting PLO: Partially Acceptable

Efferent Listening Lesson Science, 4th Grade (Kovach)

Eff
Exceeds expectations (20

points) (0 Errors)
Meets Expectations (16

points)
Attending or
Paying
Attention
Student appears to be
paying full attention all of the
time
Student consistently
participates in discussions
about attending and shows
strong understanding of this
step in the listening process
Receiving or
Hearing
receiving all of the time
about receiving and shows
paying attention most of the
time
Student frequently
adequate understanding of
this step in the listening
process
receiving most of the time
Student frequently
adequate understanding of
process
Assigning
Meaning or
Understanding
assigning meaning all of the
time
participates in discussions about
assigning meaning and shows
assigning meaning most of
the time
Student frequently
about assigning meaning and
shows adequate
understanding of this step in
the listening process
Partially Meets
Expectations (14
points)
paying attention some of the
time
Student seldom
some understanding of this
*
receiving some of the time
Student seldom
some understanding of this
Did Not Meet

Expectations
(12 points)
Student appears to pay
little or no attention
Student rarely or never
little or no understanding
of this step in the listening
process
assigning meaning some of the
time
Student seldom
about assigning meaning and
shows some understanding of
process
Student appears to
assign meaning seldom or
never
Student rarely or never
about assigning meaning
and shows little or no
understanding of this step
in the listening process
Student appears to
receive little or not at all
Student rarely or
never participates in
discussions about receives
and shows little or no
understanding of this step
in the listening process
Note Taking
Outline
Student makes a
positive, strong attempt to
take good notes.
Notes taken reflect the
effort put in
Student makes a
positive, strong attempt to
transfer notes to outline.
Outline is completely
finished and contains
correct information
Total Points 20 x
Student makes a positive

attempt to take good notes,
but notes are not good or too
few
Student attempts to take

some notes, and notes are
present but not of good
quality or number
Student makes little or no

attempt to take any notes
Student makes a positive,

attempt to transfer notes to
outline.
Outline is mostly finished
and/or contains most correct
information
Student makes an
attempt to transfer notes to
outline.
Outline is somewhat
finished and/or contains
some incorrect information
*
14 x
Student makes little or no

effort to transfer notes to
outline.
Outline shows little to no
work and/or contains almost all
incorrect information
16 x
12 x
Total possible points to earn: 100

Minimum level of having met the primary learning outcome: 70 total points (partially met expectations) or the student receives the
score with the asterisk or higher in every category (minimum of seventy possible points).
Students must earn a total of:
100 points 80 - 99 points 70
- 79 points 69 - 0 points
To receive: Exceeds
Expectations Meet
Expectations Partially Meet
Expectations Did Not Meet
Expectations
ECED 4300 students, Root, T., Ed. D., (2006, Fall)
Note-taking Rubric
Exceeds
Graphic
organizer
Students
completed topic
Students
provided at least
four notes
(M)
Notes
Followed notestructure
taking structure
completely
Only used key
words or phrases.
No complete
sentences used
(E)
Met
Partially Met
Students
completed topic
Students
provided two to
three notes
Students did not

correctly
complete the
topic
Students
provided one
(M)
note (P)
Mostly followed Rarely followed
the note taking
the note taking
structure
structure
Mostly used key Used mostly
words and
complete
phrases
sentences
Very few key
words used
(M)
(P)
No attempt/ Does
not meet
Students made no
attempt to take
notes
(N)
Did not follow
the note-taking
structure at all.
Used all
complete
sentences Or
Student made no
attempt and did
not have any
notes (N)
total
PLO:
The students will take notes on a graphic organizer while listening to the teacher read
about stars and constellations.
(E) = Exceeds
(M) = Met
(P) = Partially met
(N) = Not met
Casey Pearson ECED 4300 B Fall 2006 Note-taking Rubric
Students Name________________________________________
Note-taking Scoring Guide

Graphic
Organizer
4
All three
questions
completed with
the correct
answer.
(M)
Followed notetaking structure
completely.
Only used key
words or phrases.
No complete
sentences used.
(M)
Primary Learning Outcomes:
(M)= Met
(P)= Partially met
(N)= Not met
Structure
of Notes
3
All questions
attempted
with at least
two questions
answered
correctly.
(M)
Followed the
structure of
note-taking
most of the
time.
(M)
2
One question
completed
with correct
answer.
(P)
Used mostly
complete
sentences.
Very few key
words used.
(P)
1
No attempt
made to
answer
any
questions.
(N)
Did not
follow the
notetaking
structure
at all.
(N)
Pellitteri, R. (2006,October 23). Note-taking scoring guide. Unpublished scoring guide.
Rubric for Efferent Listening

Name_________________ Grade level___ Date________
Category
Exceeds
Meets
Partially Meets
Does Not
Expectations
Expectations
Expectations
Attempt
Form
Used fragments
Used some
Used some
No attempt
and
fragments and
sentences and
abbreviations
abbreviations
fragments
Facts
Lists 4 or more
Lists 3 facts
Lists 1-2 facts
No attempt
facts
Questions
Answers all 3
Answers 2
Answers 1
No attempt
questions
questions
question
correctly
correctly
correctly
Grimes, C. (2006). Rubric for Efferent Listening. Unpublished manuscript, Valdosta
StateUniversity, Valdosta GA.
10
11
Name _____________________ Date _______________________
4th Grade Note-Taking Scoring Guide

PLO: A. The students will take notes while listening to details related to the main idea.
Met PLO
Partially Met PLO
Did Not Meet
(3 pts.)
(2pts.)
PLO
(1pts.)
Focus
-Completes the graphic
-Attempted to complete
-Did not attempt to
organizer by writing
graphic organizer.
complete graphic
notes.
organizer.
Format
-Wrote in note-taking
-Wrote in note-taking format
-Did not write any
Requirements format and included the and included the following
notes.
following components:
components (main idea and/or
-Main ideas and/or
supporting details), but did not
supporting details
complete the graphic organizer.
Total Points
3 x ____=_____
2 x _____=_____
1 x ____=_____
Total points earned of 6 possible points = _______
The minimum level score for the student to have met the primary learning outcome is 5.
Scoring guide revised from one developed by Ronica Sains, ECED 4300, Dr. Tonja Root,
(Professor), Fall 2005, Margaret Ann Carter, ECED 4300, Fall 2006
Listening Rubric
*Zero points will be earned for performance below the one point descriptor.
Acceptable: (3)
Partially Acceptable:
Not Acceptable: (1)
points
(2) points
points
*Student identifies
*Student attempts
*Student attempts
meaning of three of the
meaning for two of the
meanings for one of the
four words.
four words.
four words.
*Student identifies a
*Student identifies a
Student does not
two or more word
one word meaning that
include a meaning or
meaning that is
is accurate for the word definition is not
accurate for the word
prejudice.
accurate for the word
prejudice.
prejudice.
Total points possible: 6
Total points earned: __
Comments:
By Rachel Music
12
Efferent Listening Scoring Rubric (Parker)

Acceptable (3 pts.)
Format
Conten
t
Uses partial sentences or

phrases
Uses abbreviations
Legible
Gives main idea in
acceptable form. (phrase or
abbreviation)
Gives 3 or more details
3 x ________ = _______
Partially Acceptable (2
pts.)
Writes complete
sentences
No abbreviations
Illegible
Part of main idea
At least 2 details
0*
No
attempt
No
attempt
2 x ________ = _______
1 x ________
= _______
From: North West Regional Educational Laboratory. (n.d.). North West Regional Educational
Laboratory 6 + 1 Traits Writing Scoring Guide. Retrieved January 14, 2004, from
http://www.nwrel.org/assessment/scoring.asp?odelay=3&d=1
11 15 Points ---- Met PLO
6 10 Points ---- Partially met PLO
Below 6 Points --- Did not meet PLO
Scoring Rubric for Summary on 1920s (Stone)

3
2
The student took *
The student took P
notes on all of the
notes on some of the
topics discussed.
topics discussed.
The student
*
The student defined 5defined 8-9 terms they
7 of the terms they
were asked to define. were asked to define.
The student wrote * a
summary of the
1920s with the length
of of a page (or at
least 20 sentences)
The student had 1 or
no grammatical
errors.
*- Mastery of PLO
P- Partially met PLO
The student wrote a

summary of the
of a of page (or at
least 15 sentences)
The student had *
2-5 grammatical
errors.
1
The student took
notes on 1-2 of the
topics discussed.
The student P
defined 2-4 of the
terms they were asked
to define.
The student wrote P a
summary of the
page (or at least 10
sentences)
The student had P
6-9 grammatical
errors.
0
The student took no
notes.
The student defined 1
or none of the terms
they asked to define.
The student wrote a
summary of the
less than 10 sentences.
The student had more
than 10 grammatical
errors.
13
Rubric for Efferent Listening and Note-Taking (Williams)

Students Name____________________________________________
Grade level ____________ Date __________________
Met the PLO (+)
Partially met the PLO Did not meet the PLO
(-)
(X)
Listening/
Attentive to the lesson;
Attentive part of the
Completely unfocused;
Paying
actively participated in the
time; somewhat off
no active participation
Attention
discussion; responded to
task; little active
in the lesson
questions asked
participation
NoteStudent took at least 4
Student took 3 notes
Student wrote less than
Taking
notes based on the
based on the
3 notes based on the
information heard.
information heard.
information heard.
Quality of
Included enough
Simply listed 1 word
Did not write anything
the Notes
information to make sense
notes the majority of
and make them easy to
the time; may have
understand; included
written incomplete
names, terms, dates, and/
notes at times
or important locations or
events
(+) = Indicates the level required to meet the PLO
(- ) = Indicates the level required to partially meet the PLO
(X) = Indicates the level that does not meet the PLO
Scoring guide for ELA Listening Lesson (Natasha Wilson)

Acceptable
Filled out Notes
Filled out Notes with
accurate information

notes (Met)
notes (Met)
Partially Acceptable
one or two notes
(Partially met)
one or two notes
(Partially met)
Level of PLO
Minimal Level of meeting PLO: Partially Acceptable
Not Acceptable

Listening Scoring Guides F 06

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Listening Scoring Guides F 06

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Listening Scoring Guides