© All Rights Reserved

392 views

© All Rights Reserved

- DESIGN GUIDE 29-Vertical Bracing Connections
- A Simple Guide to the Direct Analysis Method
- Crane Runway Beam Design - AISC LRFD 2010 and ASD 2010s.pdf
- Notes on the Nodal and Relative Lateral Stability Bracing Requirements of AISC 360 (1)
- DG04 - Extended End-Plate Moment Connections
- IIW-Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components[1]
- AISC direct analysis method
- Eurocode Example Load Combinations
- COADE Pipe Stress Analysis Seminar Notes
- Analytical Modeling of ASTM Lap Shear Adhesive Specimens
- AISC Design Guide 33 Curved Member Design 2018
- Limcon V3 User Manual
- 14wcee Paper
- framo
- Eurocode Load Combinations for Steel Structures 2010
- Design Guide 26 Design of Blast Resistant Structures
- Steel Detailer Manual 3rd edition.pdf
- Design of Pressure Vessels Under ASME Section VIII
- Casing and Cement Course
- Femap Neutral File Format

You are on page 1of 2

SUBHASH C. GOEL

tension, Ft = 0.6Fy, and that in shear, iv = 0.4/^, where Fy

denotes the yield strength of the material. Checking the

stresses in tension and shear separately against the corresponding allowable values in the base metal is generally

considered adequate enough. This practice can be defended rationally in situations where maximum normal and

shear stresses do not occur at the same point, such as in the

design of bending members (except for plate girder webs

where tension field action is utilized).

Quite frequently, however, situations are encountered

where maximum normal and shear stresses occur simultaneously, such as in members subjected to combined

bending and torsion or in connection design. Checking the

section at the base of gusset plate for an inclined bracing

member (Fig. 1) is a common example. Such situations are

not covered in the current AISC Specification. Keeping the

normal and shear stresses within their individual allowable

limits in these cases may lead to grossly unconservative

results. A rational design criterion for these situations

should be based on combining the two stresses in some

reasonable manner.

This paper examines the problem briefly from a theoretical viewpoint. A simple empirical equation is proposed for

use in practical design. The proposed equation gives results

which are in close agreement with those obtained by using

Von Mises' yield criterion.

and shear stresses, respectively, at a point under consideration (Fig. 2). Equating the maximum principal stress to Ft

gives.

Fig. 1. Example

The use of maximum principal stress theory can be justified

in design situations where the failure mode is governed by

brittle fracture, such as in fatigue loading. If this theory is

used in design when yielding governs the failure mode and

the maximum principal stress is kept at Ft (as is sometimes

suggested), it could lead to unconservative results. In order

*-f*

of Micfiigan, Ann Arbor, Micfiigan.

124

L

2

1

2

or

smaller values of tension stress. For fi = 0, the equation

would allow/, = 0.866F^, which may be considered a bit

conservative.

w(fr-^'-.

'i^nhm

=1

(1)

from Fig. 3 that increasingly unconservative results are

obtained as the tension stress becomes smaller. In the Hmit

when ft = 0, one gets flF^ = 1.5. This would not be

acceptable.

VON MISES' YIELD CRITERION

Von Mises' yield criterion is quite commonly used in design

when yielding governs the strength, such as under normal

load conditions. Application of this criterion to the combined stress condition under consideration herein (Fig. 2)

leads to the following equation:

k\f? + 2>f^) = F,^

(2)

2 can be transformed into the following:

F,}

3\Fj

(3)

1.5 r.

EMPIRICAL EQUATIONS

Equation 3, which is based on Von Mises' yield criterion, is

simple enough for use in practical design. However, as

noted above it gives somewhat conservative results in the

region of small values of tension stress. It would be desirable to use an equation which incorporates factors of safety

consistent with those in the current Specification over the

entire range of application. As afirstattempt linear interaction equation of the following form may be considered:

(4)

A plot of this equation, shown by dashed line in Fig. 3,

indicates that it may be overly conservative for the most

part when compared with Eq. 3 which was derived from

Von Mises' yield criterion.

Now consider the following empirical equation:

F,

\F,

=1

(5)

results are quite close to those from Eq. 3 and the curve

leads t o / / F ^ = 1.0 and/ZF^ = 1.0 at the two ends. In

addition, Eq. 5 is simple enough for practical design appHcation.

CONCLUSION

An empirical equation of the form

AJiNi

Ft

shear stresses. This equation has desired simpHcity, and

gives results which are close to those obtained by using the

Von Mises' yield criterion and factors of safety consistent

with the ones used in current AISC Specification.

It would be desirable to vahdate the above equation with

some experimental results.

(^)

0.5

THIRD QUARTER/1986

125

- DESIGN GUIDE 29-Vertical Bracing ConnectionsUploaded byAbhishek Pathade
- A Simple Guide to the Direct Analysis MethodUploaded bySamuel Pinto
- Crane Runway Beam Design - AISC LRFD 2010 and ASD 2010s.pdfUploaded byAnonymous 7Aw2NbC
- Notes on the Nodal and Relative Lateral Stability Bracing Requirements of AISC 360 (1)Uploaded byHardic Shah
- DG04 - Extended End-Plate Moment ConnectionsUploaded byCarlos Miguel
- IIW-Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components[1]Uploaded byhansejude
- AISC direct analysis methodUploaded byyoussefayay
- Eurocode Example Load CombinationsUploaded byRobert Ellul
- COADE Pipe Stress Analysis Seminar NotesUploaded byHaithem
- Analytical Modeling of ASTM Lap Shear Adhesive SpecimensUploaded byvlad lupasteanu
- AISC Design Guide 33 Curved Member Design 2018Uploaded bysaital
- Limcon V3 User ManualUploaded byĐạt Nguyễn Tuấn
- 14wcee PaperUploaded byDaniel Alfredo Cruz Pineda
- framoUploaded byADЯIEN BЯE
- Eurocode Load Combinations for Steel Structures 2010Uploaded byAram Chtchyan
- Design Guide 26 Design of Blast Resistant StructuresUploaded bypaarth93
- Steel Detailer Manual 3rd edition.pdfUploaded byCapustean Arcadie
- Design of Pressure Vessels Under ASME Section VIIIUploaded byAnonymous d23gWCRQ
- Casing and Cement CourseUploaded byMortaja Ben Khalifa
- Femap Neutral File FormatUploaded byMSC Nastran Beginner
- CI-41-C-P-27.0001-A.pdfUploaded byAgustín Ramos López
- NGK Locke Poly LinePostUploaded byHFandino1
- Lecture 17 Plastic Stress Strains Relationships IIUploaded byManoj Mallick
- pdf-5Uploaded byJames Bund
- Equation Sheets for Principles of Design Spring 2015Uploaded bySarah Peterson
- md quizUploaded byGagan Kaushik
- Enhanced Type VII 2002Uploaded byfredrikreithe
- CAE-3_SY-B_Mechanics of Soild_BMEL206.xlsxUploaded bySandeep Bhaskar
- THAI ST ANALYSIS.pdfUploaded byAbdul Hamid Bhatti
- short delay timesUploaded byenrike zamora

- Tib-e-Nabvi_S.AUploaded byzeemas
- Aisc - Open Deck Parking SolutionsUploaded bycalaud
- Parking Prototype II.pdfUploaded byzeemas
- Parking_Prototype_1.pdfUploaded byzeemas
- CTBUH Journal 2009-3[1]Uploaded byzeemas
- 30743_HSS_connUploaded byPauloAndresSepulveda
- Combined Shear and Tension Stresses.pdfUploaded byzeemas
- Article-Swinging the towers.pdfUploaded byzeemas
- Expansion Joints - When Where and HowUploaded byzeemas

- 27 Always Learning TGUploaded byuniversalpee
- unemployment.pptUploaded byGoutam Reddy
- Kunter & Plag Budapest 2014Uploaded byFrancesco-Alessio Ursini
- 61646 Levelised Cost of Electricity Peer Review Paper FINALUploaded byNelson Alejandro Melo
- Seginus Inc is Proud to Announce New PMA Release: 725495EH Thrust Washer (OEM 725495 Thrust Washer)Uploaded byPR.com
- Awsgsg Emr (1)Uploaded bymanishsg
- Manila Pavilion vs Henry DeladaUploaded byDadi Lo
- Physics Bitsat 2010 Sample Test 3Uploaded byAbhay Kumar Nayak
- Skyrim Dragonborn QuestsUploaded byÁlvaro Pérez Alba
- Legal Ethics (Case Digest 1-40).docxUploaded byLance Apolonio
- pt3 questionUploaded byMummy Zuan
- imogenekingfinalUploaded byapi-239581502
- SAEzzmarUploaded byfarchipmm58
- Libros. HrotsUploaded byJonathan Rosas
- Wk 5 AlgorithmsUploaded byPei Yin
- Peer Observation- A Reflective ModelUploaded byGary Robert
- Bongcac vs SBUploaded byChase Daclan
- core professional disclosure statementUploaded byapi-269544853
- unit 2 - supply demandUploaded byapi-428447569
- 28273998 Hematology 3 1 the Red Blood CellUploaded bypieterinpretoria391
- Power Point Dr. Armen, Sp.radUploaded byFahmy Siregar
- A guide to COTUploaded bypublimedia01
- Hynx v RMBSUploaded byGrandeplease
- Benjamin J. Shipman's ''Hand-book of Common-Law Pleading'' 601 (1895 Ed. 2)Uploaded byJulian
- TG04Uploaded byKanwar Pawar
- MRay_0Uploaded byNicholas White
- PgMP Standard Exam Study NotesUploaded byJillian_O_Conn_5109
- Hipercolesterolemii Familiale EAS 2015Uploaded byRalu Joya
- đề thi thử tốt nghiệp môn tiếng anh 2009-2010Uploaded byThoa Le
- A Roadmap WCM Implementation-tesisUploaded byTatiana Benavides Acosta