Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, 1 Hwayang-dong, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul
143-701, Republic of Korea
951
D. Herebian et al.
non-polar (hexane) extracts obtained from the Curcuma species, C. domestica, using various different analytical hyphenated
detection techniques, such as GC/MS and LC-MS, which offer
clear advantages compared with the previously described methods.
Experimental
Chemicals and Reagents
Commercially available curcumin, which consists of a mixture of
three naturally occurring curcuminoids, curcumin (1) (70%), demethoxycurcumin (2) (23%) and bisdemethoxycurcumi (3) (7%), was
obtained from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA). Methanol and acetonitrile
(HPLC grade) were purchased from Baker (Deventer, The Netherlands). n-Hexane was supplied by Merck KGaA (Darmstadt,
Germany). Formic acid and ammonium acetate (analytical grade)
were supplied by Fluka (Riedel-de Han, Seelze, Germany).
Deionized water was re-distilled in all experiments. All standards
used to confirm the identity of metabolites from GC-MS measurements as well as derivatization reagents (MSTFA and methoxyamine hydrochloride) were obtained from Sigma (St Louis,
MO, USA).
Plant Material
The fresh rhizomes of C. domestica were brought to the laboratory,
Natural Products Chemistry, Institute of Agricultural Science and
Technology, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of
Korea, on February 2005 from a local herbal market in Phnom
Pemh city, the capital of Cambodia. All rhizome samples were
chopped into small pieces and air-dried.
Extraction Procedures
Dried rhizomes of C. domestica (1.95 kg) were extracted with 80%
aqueous methanol (7 L) for 30 days. One liter of the 80% aqueous
methanol extract was taken and partitioned with hexane (1 L).
The aqueous methanol layer was freeze-dried in order to obtain
5.05 g of solid material, whereas the hexane-soluble part was
concentrated using a rotary evaporator (Bchi Rotavapor R-114,
Germany) at 40C (Bchi Waterbath B-480, Germany) resulting in
a yield of 8.99 g of solid material.
Microcapillary HPLC- LTQ-Orbitrap
952
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
953
resolved by gas chromatography. A GC-MS total ion chromatogram from the methanolic polar phase is shown in Fig. 1.
The chromatogram is made up of a complex pattern of major,
minor and trace peaks. In order to identify the chemical nature
of each peak their recorded spectra were compared with commercially available mass spectral libraries such as NIST or Wiley.
In addition, determination of retention indices (RI), which were
scaled with a time standard mixture of 14 hydrocarbons from an
internally compiled library, was also done for all detected compounds after their mass spectra had been deconvoluted using
the software AMDIS. The six major compounds identified were
glycerol, malic acid, citric acid, fructose, glucose, and sucrose. A
further 55 analytes of known chemical structure as TMS derivatives were identified from the minor and trace peaks (Table 1).
The chemically modified extract was also analysed by a GCFID-based method under nearly the same chromatographic
conditions used in GC-MS. The calculated relative areas of the
detected compounds are listed in Table 2.
D. Herebian et al.
Figure 1. GC-MS chromatographic profile of polar metabolites as TMS derivatives from the methanolic extract of
Curcuma domestica.
954
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
Table 1. Identified polar metabolites by GC-MS as TMS/MeOX derivatives from the methanolic extract
with their sum formulae, molecular weights and ionization form
Compounds
Sum formulas
MW [g/mol]
[M]+
[M15]+
3
3
4
5/1
5/1
8
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
3
2
2
3
2
4
4
3
5
2
2
2
6
6
2
6
2
2
2
3
2/1
2
3
3
3
2
2
5
4/1
4
2
2
3
3
2
3
3
4
5
4
2
3
8
2
4
2
1
C12H32O3Si3
C13H30O5Si3
C18H40O7Si4
C22H55NO6Si5
C22H55NO6Si5
C36H86O11Si8
C9H22O3Si2
C9H23NO2Si2
C8H18O4Si2
C9H20O4Si2
C8H24O2Si2
C11H27NO2Si2
C9H27O4PSi3
C10H22O4Si2
C12H30O4Si3
C10H20O4Si2
C10H23NO4Si2
C13H31NO4Si3
C11H23NO3Si2
C16H42O4Si4
C16H40NO5Si4
C14H33NO4Si3
C20H52O5Si5
C15H26O3Si2
C14H24O4Si2
C15H24O3Si2
C24H62O6Si6
C24H60O7Si6
C16H26O4Si2
C24H60O6Si6
C9H24O2Si2
C8H20O3Si2
C12H29NO2Si2
C9H27NOSi3
C8H21NO3Si2
C9H23NO3Si2
C12H31NO3Si3
C11H29NO2Si3
C13H33NO3Si3
C13H22O3Si2
C14H24O3Si2
C20H52O5Si5
C19H47NO5Si4
C15H41O6PSi4
C15H27NO3Si2
C16H28O4Si2
C13H33NO2Si3
C14H32O5Si3
C13H33NO2Si3
C13H32N2O3Si3
C15H30O6Si3
C16H40O5Si4
C20H50O6Si5
C19H42O5Si4
C17H28N2O2Si2
C18H36N2O6Si3
C36H86O11Si8
C12H29NO2Si2
C21H50N2O6Si4
C7H21O4PSi2
C8H13NOSi
308
350
480
569
569
918
234
233
234
248
189
261
314
262
322
260
277
349
273
410
424
363
512
310
312
308
614
628
338
612
220
220
275
249
235
249
321
291
335
282
296
512
481
460
325
340
319
364
291
348
462
424
526
462
348
460
918
275
538
256
167
350
569
569
234
233
234
248
189
261
314
262
307
260
277
349
273
410
424
363
310
312
308
338
612
275
249
235
249
291
282
296
340
319
348
462
424
462
348
275
256
167
293
335
465
554
554
219
218
219
233
174
246
299
247
307
245
262
334
258
395
409
348
497
295
297
293
323
205
205
260
220
234
306
276
320
267
281
497
445
310
325
304
349
276
333
447
409
511
447
333
445
260
523
219
152
955
1. Glycerol
2. Malic acid
3. Citric acid
4. Fructose
5. Glucose
6. Sucrose
7. Lactic acid
8. L-Alanine
9. Oxalic acid
10. Malonic acid
11. L-Valine
12. L-Valine
13. Phosphoric acid
14. Succinic acid
15. Glyceric acid
16. Fumaric acid
17. L-Aspartic acid
18. L-Aspartic acid
19. 5-Oxo-proline
20. Erythritol
21. L-Threonic acid
22. L-Glutamic acid
23. Xylitol
24. p-Hydroxycinnamic acid
25. Vanillic acid
26. p-Coumaric acid
27. Glucitol
28. Gulonic acid
29. trans-Ferulic acid
30. myo-Inositol
31. 1,3-Propandiol
32. Acetic acid
33. L-Leucine
34. Hydroxylamine
35. Carbonic acid
36. L-Serine
37. L-Serine
38. L-Glycine
39. L-Threonine
40. p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
41. p-Hydroxyphenylacetate
42. Ribitol
43. 6-Deoxy-galactose
44. -Glycerophosphate
45. L-Tyrosine
46. Dihydroferulic acid
47. -Alanine
48. Citramalic acid
49. NAcetyl-L-serine
50. L-Asparagine
51. Aconitic acid
52. Tetronic acid
53. Ribonic acid
54. Shikimic acid
55. L-Tryptophane
56. Uridine
57. Trehalose
58. L-Isoleucine
59. N-Acetylglucoseamine
60. Monomethylphosphate (A)
61. 2-Hydroxypyridin (A)
A, Artifact.
TMS/MeOX
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
D. Herebian et al.
Table 2. Identified compounds by GC-MS as TMS/MeOX derivatives from the methanolic extract
including their retention times, retention indices. Relative areas are based on GC-FID measurements
TMS/MeOX
RT
RI
Relative area
(%) (GC-FID)
1291.5
1514.3
1851.0
1918.0
1928.4
1943.5
1959.5
2716.2
7.26
5.24
3.76
7.83
6.45
11.10
2.08
9.46
1062.1
1103.4
1135.2
1179.0
1201.4
1215.1
1289.6
1324.9
1353.6
1360.0
1441.3
1536.7
1541.7
1543.1
1574.3
1638.6
1758.4
1768.9
1774.7
1948.0
1974.6
2048.0
2104.9
2133.1
1.52
0.41
1.56
1.18
0.40
0.12
1.05
1.39
0.49
0.54
0.83
1.29
0.39
1.33
0.47
0.37
2.03
2.80
0.17
1.28
2.33
2.20
0.61
1.43
1029.5
1054.3
1076.6
1083.5
1110.8
1141.3
1265.1
1281.5
1305.6
1317.7
1384.7
1413.0
1445.0
1495.6
1527.3
1590.0
1633.7
1648.1
1690.3
956
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
Table 2. (Continued)
TMS/MeOX
50. Ribitol
51. 6-Deoxy-galactose
52. Aconitic acid
53. -Glycerophosphate
54. Ribonic acid
55. Shikimc acid
56. L-Tyrosine
57. Dihydroferulic acid
58. N-Acetyl-glucosamine
59. L-Tryptophane
60. Uridine
61. Trehalose
5TMS
4TMS 1MeOX
3TMS
4TMS
5TMS
4TMS
2TMS
2TMS
4TMS
2TMS
3TMS
8TMS
RT
RI
Relative area
(%) (GC-FID)
24.3
24.7
24.9
25.5
25.6
26.2
27.2
27.3
30.7
32.1
35.4
39.9
1734.2
1754.2
1768.6
1797.3
1802.7
1840.0
1898.5
1908.3
2125.7
2219.5
2475.5
2818.8
TMS, trimethylsilyl. MeOx, methoxime (this procedure serves to avoid sugar ring cyclization and produces two forms of peaks, syn and anti). A, artifact.
Figure 2. GC-MS chromatographic profile of non-polar metabolites from the hexane extract of Curcuma
domestica.
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
957
at a resolving power of 60,000 in internal (for positive ionization) or external (for negative ionization) calibration mode. The
high-resolution full-scan in a positive ion mode (scan range
m/z 85 380) was used to identify curcuminoids and their
metabolites. The full-scan mass spectra of the curcuminoid and
their metabolite fractions detected the presence of 21, 20 and
19 carbons for curcumin (CURC) 1 (and its metabolite, dihydrocurcumin 4), demethoxycurcumin (DMC) 2 (and its metabolite,
dihydro-demethoxycurcumin 5) and bisdemethoxycurcumin (BDMC)
D. Herebian et al.
RT
RI
Formula MW Relative
area (%)
216
218
218
19.5
20.1
17.6
154
136
204
204
202
204
204
204
<1
<1
<1
<1
2.3
2.3
<1
4.1
10.3
12,4
25.1
25,7
25.9
26.2
26.6
27.1
1048
1094
1086
1478
1481
1495
1508
1523
C10H18O
C10H16
C15H24
C15H24
C15H22
C15H24
C15H24
C15H24
of one or two methoxy groups of the curcuminoids on the aromatic rings. The MS/MS spectra were dominated by a couple of
major peaks at m/z 285, 245 and 175 for 1; 255, 245 and 175 for
2; and 225 and 147 for 3, respectively (Fig. 5). The expected loss
of water was observed in all three compounds at m/z 351 (1),
321 (2) and 291 (3). The proposed molecular structures of the
protonated major fragment ions are illustrated in Fig. 6. All other
fragments are listed in Table 7 and are in agreement with previously published results, which were based on accurate mass
FTICR-MS/MS measurements (Table 7).
The deprotonation of the curcuminoids could theoretically
occur at various positions e.g. on the keto and/or enol forms of
the heptanoid chain. In the LC-ESI-neg-MS analysis [MH] ions
were observed at m/z 367 (1), 337 (2) and 307 (3) as the phenolate, the enolate or a mixture of both forms. Additional details
regarding the deprotonation behavior of curcuminoids in the
ESI negative mode have been previously discussed (Jiang et al.,
2006a, b). The LC-ESI-neg-MS/MS spectra exhibited characteristic base peaks at m/z 134 and 158 for 1; 119 and 158 for 2; and
119, 143, and 187 for 3 (Fig. 7). The product ion spectra in the
negative mode were of high quality because of the presence of
multiple hydroxyl groups on the corresponding molecule, which
facilitates the negative ionization process in the electrospray.
Figure 7 reproduces the product ions of curcuminoids, which were
fragmented at 50 eV by HCD cell of the LTQ-Orbitrap. The HCD
spectra gave many more fragmentation peaks than the conventional CID technique. All other product ions are listed in Table 8
and the assignments of the base peaks are presented in Fig. 8.
Conclusions
Here, we report the development and application of a GC-MS
method for the identification of polar metabolites from the
methanolic extract of Curcuma domestica. To the best of our
knowledge this is the first report where this has been demonstrated. In addition we were able to identify 61 polar compounds
as TMS derivatives by means of their retention times, retention
indices and fragmentation patterns. A high-resolution GC-MS
method was also developed and utilized to confirm the identity
of the 11 non-polar compounds from the hexane extract. Both
methods can serve as analytical tools for the quality control of
various turmeric species (metabolic fingerprint) or for better
understanding in the biosynthetic pathways of turmeric and
their derivatives.
Table 4. Accurate mass measurements within 3 ppm error were obtained for non-polar compounds
(hexane-extraction) using DFS high-resolution GC/MS (Thermo Fischer Scientific)
Compounds
958
ar-Turmerone
-Turmerone
-Turmerone
Cineole
a-Terpinolene
Z--Farnesene
-Himachalene
ar-Curcumene
-Zingiberene
-Bisabolene
-Sesquiphellandrene
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
RT
Formula
masstheor
massexp
ppm
31.3
31.4
32.3
10.3
12.4
25.1
25.7
25.9
26.2
26.6
27.1
C15H20O
C15H22O
C15H22O
C10H18O
C10H16
C15H24
C15H24
C15H22
C15H24
C15H24
C15H24
216.15087
218.16652
218.16652
154.13522
136.12465
204.18725
204.18725
202.17160
204.18725
204.18725
204.18725
216.15104
218.16712
218.16701
154.13532
136.12425
204.18771
204.18773
202.17212
204.18714
204.18766
204.18745
0.477
2.765
2.260
0.670
2.954
2.241
2.339
2.561
0.550
1.997
0.968
Table 5. Precursor ion masses of curcuminoids and their metabolites including elemental compositions determined by high resolution and accurate mass LTQ-Orbitrap measurements in ESI-positive ion mode
Compound, ionized form
Curcumin, [M + H]+
Demethoxycurcumin, [M + H]+
Bisdemethoxycurcumin, [M + H]+
Dihydro-curcumin, [M + H]+
Dihydro-demethoxycurcumin, [M + H]+
Dihydro-bisdemethoxycurcumin, [M + H]+
Ion
Calculated
mass
Measured
mass
ppm
Elemental
composition
1
2
3
4
5
6
369.13326
339.12270
309.11213
371.14891
341.13835
311.12778
369.13315
339.12258
309.11198
371.14890
341.13834
311.12773
0.115
0.051
0.156
0.015
0.011
0.056
C21H21O6
C20H19O5
C19H17O4
C21H23O6
C20H21O5
C19H19O4
Table 6. Precursor ion masses of curcuminoids including elemental compositions determined by high-resolution and accurate
mass LTQ-Orbitrap measurements in ESI-negative mode
Compound, ionized form
Curcumin, [MH]
Demethoxycurcumin, [MH]
Bisdemethoxycurcumin, [MH]
Ion
Calculated
mass
Measured
mass
ppm
Elemental
composition
1
2
3
367.11761
337.10705
307.09648
367.11746
337.10733
307.09808
0.155
0.280
1.594
C21H19O6
C20H17O5
C19H15O4
959
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
D. Herebian et al.
Figure 4. LC-MS full-scan chromatogram of curcuminoid mixture, containing curcumin 1, demethoxycurcumin 2 and
bisdemethoxycurcumin 3.
References
960
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
Figure 5. Product ion spectra of curcuminoids 1, 2 and 3 from positive ion LC-ESI-MS/MS measurements using the LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer.
961
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
D. Herebian et al.
Figure 6.
Table 7. Fragment ions of curcuminoids in positive ESI-mode using high resolution and
accurate mass LTQ-Orbitrap-MS/MS measurements (CID 35 eV)
Nominal mass
of fragment ions
Measured
mass
Calculated
mass
ppm
Elemental
composition
Curcumin 1
351
299
285
259
245
213
175
351.09250
299.12784
285.11246
259.09662
245.08067
213.05463
175.07536
351.12270
299.12778
285.08095
259.09648
245.08095
213.05462
175.07535
0.31
0.05
0.32
0.13
0.17
0.01
0.00
C21H19O5
C18H19O4
C17H17O4
C15H15O4
C14H13O4
C13H9O3
C11H11O2
Demthoxycurcumin 2
321
293
269
255
245
229
175
147
321.11276
293.11776
269.11673
255.10123
245.08095
229.08544
175.07512
147.04374
321.11213
293.11722
269.11723
255.10157
245.08083
229.08592
175.07535
147.04405
0.62
0.54
0.49
0.34
0.09
0.48
0.24
0.16
C20H17O4
C19H17O3
C17H17O3
C16H15O3
C14H13O4
C14H13O3
C11H11O2
C9H7O2
Bisdemethoxycurcumin 3
291
291.10178
263
263.10622
239
239.10631
225
225.09081
215
215.06998
189
189.05432
163
163.03851
147
147.04388
131
131.04894
107
107.04908
291.10157
263.10665
239.10665
225.09101
215.07027
189.05462
163.03897
147.04405
131.04914
107.04914
0.21
0.44
0.35
0.19
0.29
0.30
0.46
0.18
0.20
0.06
C19H15O3
C18H15O2
C16H15O2
C15H13O2
C13H11O3
C11H9O3
C9H7O3
C9H7O2
C9H7O1
C7H7O1
962
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
Figure 7. Product ion spectra of curcuminoids 1, 2 and 3 from negative ion LCESI-MS/MS measurements using the LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer.
963
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
D. Herebian et al.
Calculated
mass
Measured
mass
ppm
Elemental
composition
Curcumin 1
201
175
173
160
158
149
134
132
201.01933
175.04007
173.06080
160.01659
158.03733
149.06080
134.03733
132.02168
201.01894
175.03957
173.06037
160.01628
158.03710
149.06136
134.03697
132.02143
1.97
2.81
2.53
1.96
1.44
2.91
2.65
1.91
C11H5O4
C10H7O3
C11H9O2
C9H4O3
C10H6O2
C9H9O2
C8H6O2
C8H4O2
Demethoxycurcumin 2
202
201
175
173
160
158
149
145
143
134
119
202.02716
201.01933
175.04007
173.06080
160.01659
158.03733
149.06080
145.02950
143.05024
134.03733
119.05024
202.02700
201.01875
175.03977
173.06025
160.01623
158.03697
149.06043
145.02906
143.04985
134.03693
119.04981
0.79
2.91
1.69
3.21
2.26
2.29
2.50
2.96
2.75
2.96
3.62
C11H6O4
C11H5O4
C10H7O3
C11H9O2
C9H4O3
C10H6O2
C9H9O2
C9H5O2
C10H7O
C8H6O2
C8H7O
Bisdemethoxycurcumin 3
187
187.04007
145
145.02950
143
143.05024
119
119.05024
117
117.03459
115
115.05532
187.03988
145.02924
143.05004
119.04997
117.03439
115.05519
1.01
1.80
1.37
2.22
1.67
1.16
C11H7O3
C9H5O2
C10H7O
C8H7O
C8H5O
C9H7
Figure 8. Proposed molecular structures for detected fragment ions from LC-ESI(neg)-MS/
MS measurements.
964
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc
965
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/bmc