Professional Documents
Culture Documents
200
400
600
800
Conventional Suburban Development
Lee
Rd
K Mart .
So
nue
la
e
na
v
a ndo A
Av
Or l
e.
We Winter Park
b ste
r Vo Tech
Winter Park Av
e.
Village
.
g Dr
nnin
De
Lee
Rd
K Mart .
So
nue
la
e
na
v
a ndo A
Av
Or l
e.
We Winter Park
b ste
r Vo Tech
Winter Park Av
e.
Village
.
g Dr
nnin
De
Lee
Rd
K Mart .
So
nue
la
e
na
v
a ndo A
Av
Or l
e.
We Winter Park
b ste
r Vo Tech
Winter Park Av
e.
Village
.
g Dr
nnin
De
Lee
Rd
K Mart .
So
nue
la
e
na
v
a ndo A
Av
Or l
e.
We Winter Park
b ste
r Vo Tech
Winter Park Av
e.
Village
.
g Dr
nnin
De
Lee
Rd
K Mart .
So
nue
la
e
na
v
a ndo A
Av
Or l
e.
We Winter Park
b ste
r Vo Tech
Winter Park Av
e.
Village
.
g Dr
nnin
De
Lee
Rd
K Mart .
So
nue
la
e
na
v
a ndo A
Av
Or l
e.
We
b ste
r Av
Winter Park e.
Village
.
g Dr
nnin
De
Lee Road Mixed Use
Extension Redevelopment
Lee
Rd
K Mart .
ve nue
la ndo A
Or
We
b ste
r Av
Winter Park e.
Village
. Residential
g Dr Redevelopment
W.P.V. in
Development nn
De
Traffic: (on existing Rt. 31)
• Trucks: 11-14%
• Existing: 2000
20,000-27,000 ADT
• No-Build: 2028
55,000-70,000 ADT
• Build: 2028
te 31
Existing R
ou 13,000-19,000 ADT
Rt. 31 Bypass
• Alternative Studies began in
1987
• Result: 3.3 mile bypass, four-
lane, limited access highway
• Included in FHWA Pilot
2
20 Program for Corridor
ute
Ro Preservation
• Incorporated into Raritan
Twp. and Hunterdon Co.
Master Plans
• Cost: $125-150 million
Historic Homesteads
Historic Stone Arch Bridges
The South Branch River
Existing Farms
Existing Land Use
Existing Zoning
Open Space, Historic, & Cultural
Resources
Development Pressure
Undeveloped
(Green)
Considering
Development
(Red outline)
Currently
planned or
approved
(Red)
Flemington Today
Exist
ing R
31 t.
2
e 20
ut
Ro
Character:
“Keep pastoral feel”
Parkway:
“Make sure parkway is a good
alternative to 31
“Limit access – do not make it another
31”
“Control development on Parkway”
“Integrate the Parkway in the open
space network”
• An at grade
“parkway”
• New network
connections to
provide parallel
routes to 202 and 31
31
Route
.
Rd
tion
c
Jun
n
ra
Fo
er
alt
W
Hunterdon
Central H.S.
Walter Foran Blvd. Focus Area
. Walter Foran Blvd. Focus Area
nin g Rd
ko
nea
Min
31
Route
.
Rd
tion
c
Jun
n
ra
Fo
er
alt
W
Hunterdon
Central H.S.
“Circle to Square”
LOS C LOS B
Route 31
ass
Highway Byp
ed
Propos
R oute 20
2
Route 31
R oute 20
2
Downtown Context
Framework Plan: New Street Network
Framework Plan: Parks & Open Space
Framework Plan: Transit
Grand Makeover
Is Set for
Maryland Strip City
by EUGENE L. MEYER
4
4 4
4
4 4
2 2
4 4
4
4
4 4
2 2
2 2
26 36
4 4
2 2
6 4 2 6 2 6 4 2 8 2 2 2
26 32
Existing Network Future Network
State Capital
War Memorial
US 1
Rt Bou
. 2 le
9 va
Ur rd
k
Amtra
ba
n
US 1 Amtra
k
n
ba
Ur rd
9 va
. 2 le
Rt Bou
Remember . . . You have a choice
San Francisco
Milwaukee
Portland
New York
Chattanooga
Trenton
Hartford
Syracuse
Toronto
Seattle
Atlanta …
Conventional Development Cycle
INPUTS OUTCOMES
•Auto Oriented Business •Wider Roads
•Single Use Zoning •Induced Traffic
•Single Family Residential •More Traffic
GROWTH
GROWTH
Land
LandUse
Use
Planning
Planning
Transportation
Transportation
Planning
Planning
GROWTH
GROWTH
INPUTS
OUTCOMES •Traffic Demand
•Isolated Neighborhoods Forecasting
•Multiple Automobile Trips •Congestion
•Poor Mobility •LOS
•Difficult Walking
Healthy Development Cycle
INPUTS
•Diversity of Business
•Mixed Use Zoning
•Diversity of Residential Units
•Context Sensitive Design
•Community Involvement
Land
LandUse CommunityTransportation
Use Community Transportation
Planning
Planning Planning
Planning Planning
Planning
OUTCOMES
OUTCOMES
•Healthy Neighborhoods
•More Walking &
•Choices of Transportation
Bicycling
•More Open Space SMART
SMART •Increased Access
•Sense of Place GROWTH
GROWTH
•Sense of Community
Healthy Development Cycle
INPUTS
•Diversity of Business
•Mixed Use Zoning
•Diversity of Residential Units
•Context Sensitive Design
•Community Involvement
Land
LandUse CommunityTransportation
Use Community Transportation
Planning
Planning Planning
Planning Planning
Planning
OUTCOMES
OUTCOMES
•Healthy Neighborhoods
•More Walking &
•Choices of Transportation
Bicycling
•More Open Space SMART
SMART •Increased Access
•Sense of Place GROWTH
GROWTH
•Sense of Community
Conventional Development Cycle
INPUTS OUTCOMES
•Auto Oriented Business •Wider Roads
•Single Use Zoning •Induced Traffic
•Single Family Residential •More Traffic
GROWTH
GROWTH
Land
LandUse
Use
Planning
Planning
Transportation
Transportation
Planning
Planning
GROWTH
GROWTH
INPUTS
OUTCOMES •Traffic Demand
•Isolated Neighborhoods Forecasting
•Multiple Automobile Trips •Congestion
•Poor Mobility •LOS
•Difficult Walking