Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I.
INTRODUCTION
IAS 2005
2906
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
IAS 2005
2907
IAS 2005
2908
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
0 .5
1 .5
2 .5
3 .5
4 .5
Power (Wh/ m )
Fig. 4. Ozone production rate by the pulse power.
1 00
N O an d N O x re m oval e fficie n cy (%)
III.
90
80
70
60
50
40
N O
30
N O x
20
10
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
A ir rad ic al ra tio (Q a / Q g ) (% )
Fig. 5. NO and NOx removal efficiencies vs. air radical ratio (Qa/Qg) in
the city-gas firing.
100
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
Q g= 450 m 3N /h
Q g= 900 m 3N /h
Q g=1,470 m 3N /h
30
20
10
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
(b)
Fig. 7. NO and NOx removal efficiencies vs. specific power density
to flue gas (a) Specific power density (Wh/m3), (b) Specific power
density (Wh/m3/ppm).
90
The effect of gas residence time (Rt) through the tower packing
of the scrubber on the amount of NOx removal when Qg=450,
900 and 1,470 Nm3/hr and Qa/Qg=6.0%~37.5%. As Rt
increased, the amount of NOx increased slightly because NO
inlet concentration was in the range of 30 ppm.
1 00
90
80
70
60
50
NO
(Q a/ Q g =2 4.2 % )
40
N O x (Q a /Q g =2 4 .2% )
30
NO
20
N O x (Q a /Q g =3 6 .8% )
(Q a/ Q g =3 6.8 % )
10
0
0
0 .5
1 .5
2 .5
3 .5
S p e c ific p u ls e p o w e r d e n s ity (W h / m )
IAS 2005
2909
15%, and 20%, NOx was around 37%, 47%, and 53% on
average, and reached 57% with Qa/Qg=23.9%.
1 00
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
NO
20
NOx
10
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
A ir radic al ratio (Q a/ Q g) (% )
Fig. 8. NO and NOx removal efficiencies vs. Qa/Qg for the oil firing.
1 00
90
80
Q g=660 m 3N /h
70
Q g=1170 m 3N /h
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
O 3 concentration (ppm )
(a)
100
90
Q g=660 m 3N /h
80
Q g=1170 m 3N /h
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
IAS 2005
2910
1 00
N O re m ov al e fficiency (% )
100
90
80
70
Qg=660 m3N/h
60
Qg=1170 m 3N/h
50
40
30
20
10
90
80
70
O il
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
10
20
25
30
35
40
Fig. 11. NO removal efficiency vs. air NO radical ratio (Qa/Qg) for both
fuels.
100
90
Qg=660 m 3N/h
80
70
60
50
N O re m o va l am ou n t (ppm )
Qg=1170 m3N/h
40
30
20
10
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
50
40
30
20
G as
O il
10
0
(b)
10
O
Fig. 10. NO and NOx removal efficiencies vs. specific power density.
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
c o n c e n tra tio n (p p m )
2911
10 0
90
G as
80
IAS 2005
15
G as
60
O il
70
G as
L ab o ratory
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
0 .02
0 .04
0 .06
0 .08
S pe c ific p o w e r d en s ity (W h / m / pp m )
G a s Q g = 45 0 m 3 N / h
160
O il Q g= 6 65 m 3N / h
140
L ab o . te st, G as
Q g =0 .6 m 3 N /h
10 0
180
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
90
80
70
60
50
40
Gas
30
O il
20
La b o.
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1 00
0 .01
0.0 2
0 .0 3
0.0 4
0.0 5
0 .06
S pe c ific p ow e r de n sity (W h / m / p pm )
Fig. 15. NOx removal efficiency vs. specific power density for both
fuels when Qg=450~1,470 m3N/hr, and Qa/Qg=3~37%, including the
laboratory test results when Qg=0.3, 0.49 and 0.6 m3N/hr, Qa/Qg=10%,
and NO inlet concentration of 300 ppm.
TABLE I
ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF THE SCRUBBING SOLUTION EXTRACTED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE SCRUBBER FOR BOTH FUELS.
Unit
pH (-)
BOD (mg/L)
COD (mg/L)
SS (mg/L)
S-Fe (mg/L)
T-N (mg/L)
NO2-N (mg/L)
NO3-N (mg/L)
NH4-N (mg/L)
SO3-2 (mg/L)
SO4-2 (mg/L)
Remarks
Sewage disposal
Analyzed sample
Analysis method
regulation
City-gas (8/2)
Heavy oil (8/3)
7.5 (20oC)
8.5 (20oC)
JIS K0102 12.1
5.8~8.6
84
150
JIS K0102 14.1
300
7
34
JIS K0102 17
<1
<1
JIS K0102 21
300
46
84
JIS K0102 57.2
10
19
34
JIS K0102 45.2
240
3
17
JIS K0101 37.1.1
380
13
10
JIS K0101 37.2.3
1250
625
JIS K010240.1
16000
22000
JIS K010241.3
o
1. The waste water disposal standard is based on the sewage regulation standard
specified manufacturing industry of more than 50 m3/d.
IAS 2005
Waste water
regulation
5.8~8.6
160 (Day ave. 120)
160 (Day ave. 120)
200 (Day ave. 150)
10
120 (Day ave. 60)
of Sakai city for the
2912
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
IV.
SUMMARY
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
[17]
IAS 2005
2913