From: To: Subject: Date

:

(b) (6) (b) (6)

SELF, JEFFREY ( (b) (6) Loren W Flossm (b RE: Latest Development on K-2B/C Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:55:59 AM

Thanks (b) (6) From: (b) (6)

Please give me a call when available ((b) (6)

Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:38 AM To: SELF, JEFFREY D; (b) (6) W Flossman Cc: (b) (6) Subject: FW: Latest Development on K-2B/C Gentlemen

Loren

We have confirmation from the Corps that the proposed PF225 fence alignments for the 11 remaining miles of J-2B/C and all of K-3 through K-5 are on IBWC land. Please let me know if you have any questions.

(b) (6)
From: (b) (6) Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:24 AM To: (b) (6) Cc: (b) (6) Loren W Flossman Subject: RE: Latest Development on K-2B/C Thanks ( . b Loren/(b) - I trust this will suffice as the confirmation you are looking for from the Corps. Let me know (6) if you need anything further for your meeting with the Water District.

(b) (6)
_____________________________________________ From: Sent: To: Cc:

(b) (6)
Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:19 AM

(b) (6) (b) (6)
RE: Latest Development on K-2B/C

Subject:

(b) (6) I am confident that the rest of the project is owned by IBWC for the remaining 11 miles of K-2B/C, as well as K-3, K-4 and K-5. As for the staging area I have secured the property for approximately 45% of the project and we are working on securing the rest soon. There are no more access roads or staging areas other than what you have addressed that belong to the Water District.

(b) (6)
4101 Jefferson Plaza NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109

(b) (6)

_____________________________________________ From: Sent: To: Cc:

(b) (6)
Tuesday, January 29, 2008 5:19 PM

(b) (6) (b) (6)
Latest Development on K-2B/C

Subject:

Just received a call from(b) (6) regarding K-2B/C. SBI met with the Sector and a decision has been made regarding the way ahead. (b) will be providing more detail soon, but I wanted to get the word out because this decision affects (6) current schedule for geotechnical investigations in this area, our as well as the EA. For the 8 +/- miles where the water district's canal is in close proximity to the levee, the decision was made to move the proposed fence alignment to the north side of the canal on water district property. This will likely be hotly contested by the water district (no surprise there). This part of the project will be pulled out of the EA, then once access has been obtained, investigations and preliminary designs prepared, the EA will be supplemented to cover this portion. Loren is asking for the Corps Real Estate team to provide confirmation that the proposed alignment/access/staging for the remaining 11 miles of K-2B/C, as well as K-3, K-4 and K-5 are on IBWC property (or ownership other than the Water District). If they are going to have to deal with the water district for access anywhere else on other projects, they would like to know that now. We need to provide Loren confirmation tomorrow.

(b) (6)
Chief, Planning, Programs and Technical Support Branch Engineering and Construction Support Office CESWF-PM-EP

(b) (6)

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful